You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Proceedings
  • Abstract
  • Open Access

20 November 2023

Switching towards More Plant-Based Diets in Older Adults: Implications for Protein Intake and Protein Quality Based on a Simulation Study †

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Department of Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 PB Wageningen, The Netherlands
2
Department of Nutrition and Health, HAN University of Applied Sciences, 6525 EN Nijmegen, The Netherlands
3
Wageningen Food and Biobased Research, Wageningen University & Research, 6708 WG Wageningen, The Netherlands
4
HAS Green Academy, 5223 DE Den Bosch, The Netherlands
This article belongs to the Proceedings The 14th European Nutrition Conference FENS 2023

Abstract

Rationale: An adequate amount of good-quality protein (P) is essential to remain fit and healthy at an older age. Animal-based proteins (ABPs) are of high quality and provide nearly 60% of the P intake in older adults. It is unclear if an adequate P intake can be achieved when ABPs are replaced by vegetarian (Veg) or plant-based (Plant) alternatives. Methods: A simulation study was performed based on dietary intake data from the Dutch National food consumption (DNFC) 2019–2021 (n = 607, age ≥ 65 years). In five scenarios, animal protein intake was replaced by vegetable protein. The scenario diets included vegetarian, flexitarian (two levels), pescatarian and vegan. Protein quality was measured by the Meal Protein Quality Score (MPQS), a score that ranges from 0–100 and takes into account protein digestibility, body-weight based amino acid requirements, and time window of complementation. Results: Total P and MPQS remained stable over all non-vegan plant-based scenarios, but showed a large decrease in the vegan scenario. Conclusions: shifting to a fully vegan diet severely compromises total protein intake and protein quality in older adults, whereas shifting to a vegetarian or flexitarian diet does not.

Author Contributions

P.G. presented the abstract; P.G. and J.B. wrote the abstract and analysed the data; M.D.v.d.S., J.L., A.R., I.T., M.T. and W.R. collaborated in the project and were involved in funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is available upon reasonable request and approval by RIVM.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have received funding from both plant-protein and animal-protein related companies.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.