Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of the Effect of Preparation Parameters on the Structural and Mechanical Properties of Gelatin/Elastin/Sodium Hyaluronate Scaffolds Fabricated by the Combined Foaming and Freeze-Drying Techniques
Previous Article in Special Issue
Endothermic–Exothermic Hybrid Foaming of Recycled PET Blends
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Short Review on Radiopaque Polyurethanes in Medicine: Physical Principles, Effect of Nanoparticles, Processing, Properties, and Applications

by
Julia Garavatti
and
Heitor Luiz Ornaghi Jr.
*
Postgraduate Program in Process and Technology Engineering (PGEPROTEC), Universidade de Caxias do Sul (UCS), Rua Francisco Getúlio Vargas 1130, Caxias do Sul CEP 95070-560, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8(10), 409; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8100409 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 9 August 2024 / Revised: 20 September 2024 / Accepted: 24 September 2024 / Published: 5 October 2024

Abstract

:
Polyurethanes are used in a wide range of biomedical applications due to their variety of physical–chemical, mechanical, and structural properties, and biotic and abiotic degradation. They are widely used in bio-imaging procedures when metallic-based filler particles are incorporated, making the final product radiopaque. It would be advantageous, however, if polyurethanes with intrinsic radiopacity could be produced in their synthesis, avoiding a series of disadvantages in the processing and final product and also presenting potential antimicrobial activities. This review’s objective was to study the radiopacifying characteristics of nanoparticles, the physical principles of radiopacity, and the variety of medical applications of polyurethanes with nanoparticles. It was found in this study that the synthetization of radiopaque polyurethanes is not only possible but the efficiency of synthetization was improved when using atoms with high electron density as part of the backbone or when grafted, making them great multipurpose materials.

1. Introduction

Polyurethanes (PUs) are versatile materials that can be used in a wide range of applications including building and construction, transportation, furniture and bedding appliances, packaging textiles, fibers and apparel, electronics, and footwear, among other uses. This is due to the variety of physical–chemical, mechanical, and structural properties attributed to different monomer types and ratios, allowing the formulation of soft foam to rigid parts [1,2,3,4,5,6]. PUs are one of the most promising polymers that can be used for biomedical applications, mainly due to their new biobased macromolecular architectures, which allow the control of biotic and abiotic degradation [7,8]. Medical-grade PU-based polymers can be commercially found under various trade names, such as Carbothane®, Pellethane®, and Tecoflex® from Lubrizol (US) [9] or Carbosil®, Bionate®, or Tecoflex® from DSM (Holland) [10]. According to IndustryARC [11], the medical polyurethane market size is forecast to reach USD 5.2 billion by 2026, with a CAGR of 4.3% during 2021–2026.
Some examples of PUs for biomedical applications are visualized in Scheme 1.
Besides mechanical requirements, cytotoxicity, and biocompatibility, another important feature is the visualization of the sample under a medical procedure. The radiopacity is the most important characteristic to visualize the medical device inside the human body; higher radiopacity means a better visualization. The radiopacity level depends on where the device will be inserted. Metals and ceramics are intrinsically radiopaque, while polymers tend to be translucid due to the presence of the low electronic density of atoms. Therefore, the radiopacity in polymers can be obtained in two distinct situations: the incorporation of a ceramic or metallic filler in the polymer or by synthesizing an intrinsic radiopaque polymer with a high electron density reagent (contrast agent) [12,13].
This short review’s objective is to explain the properties and materials that induce radiopacity in polyurethanes, the physical principles of radiopacity, and the medical applications, processing, and properties of these materials.

2. Radiopacity Measurement

When an external apparatus is inserted into the human body, the positioning of the apparatus is dependent on the radiopacity of the device, aiming to easily detect the surrounding anatomical structures. In practical applications, the radiopacity can be determined qualitatively by a medical doctor who can approve, or not approve, the apparatus by the visual aspect or quantitatively via the grayscale value using a photo-densitometer where the grayscale value is converted to absorbance values [14,15].
Considering dental materials, since pure aluminum’s radiopacity is extremely comparable to dentin’s, the International Standards Organization (ISO) emphasizes that any restorative material must exhibit a radiopacity equal to or greater than pure aluminum of the same thickness [16]. Transmission densitometry is the gold standard and traditional typical method for measuring radiopacity. Using this method, the grayscale value of photographic images (films or digital) is calculated and compared to that of a standard aluminum wedge with 10 steps from 1 cm to 10 cm. The grayscale value is proportional to the ratio of the incident to transmitted X-ray radiation. The value is stated in relation to the thickness of aluminum, which is equal. Since radiography images are two-dimensional, depthless projections [17], the various grayscale tones, ranging from white to black, correspond to the various anatomical features of the teeth [18].
In computed tomography, the radiopacity is quantified using quantities known as Hounsfield Units (HU), named after the engineer who invented computed tomography, Godfrey Hounsfield. The linear attenuation coefficient of distilled water is used to standardize the HU of a substance. At standard temperature and pressure, water and air are assigned HU values of 0 and 1000, respectively [19]. The degree of a material’s attenuation capabilities can only be clearly determined from its X-ray pictures, despite the fact that these imaging modalities allow for quantitative measures of the radiopacity [20,21]. Figure 1 shows the Hounsfield scale of different hard and soft tissues in the human body.
Figure 2 shows the image of an arm in a radiographic image, where the metal rods fixed in the arm are observed. The radiopacity shown by the metal rod helps professionals to monitor the evolution of the surgery after the fixation of the bones.

3. Radiopaque Polyurethanes

Many polymers can be used in medical implants for permanent or temporary use. These polymers must attend specific functions, such as drug delivery, provide physical and structural support to vascular systems, or restore the normal function of joints in arthroplasty. Besides desirable characteristics such as ease of production, various mechanical properties and biocompatibility also present a high potential for controlling properties to satisfy a wide range of requirements, which is a positive aspect. Common polymers include polyethylene, polytetrafluorethylene, poly(lactic acid), polypropylene, and polyurethane. Emonde et al. [23] pointed out the radiopacity and polymers/fillers for different applications such as bone cement, joint replacements, bioresorbable stents, craniofacial implants, spinal implants, implant dentistry, and internal fixation systems. Figure 3 and Figure 4 compare the radiopacity of UHMWPE and PLLA for medical applications.
Other polymers used for biomedical applications can consulted in Table 1, where the respective mechanical characteristics and contrast agent concentrations are shown.
Different from other polymers, polyurethanes are more versatile and the amount of PUs that can be synthetized is almost unlimited. The characteristics of the final product is dependent on the type and concentration of the monomers and synthesis conditions, among others. Therefore, soft products, such as foams, or rigid parts, such as structural rods, can be manufactured depending on the requirements needed. PUs can be synthesized to be intrinsically radiopaque by inserting a contrast agent in the chain backbone or by the incorporation of metallic or ceramic particles in the blend processing. When the contrast agent is inserted in the chain backbone, it obtains some advantages such as avoiding problems in the manufacturing of the product by incorporating particles in the polymer/particle mixture stage, which would speed up the process, avoiding the lixiviation of the material and potentially lowering the cost of production [45,46,47]. Since one of the main characteristics of radiopaque materials is the high electron density, one of the main alternatives (and more appropriate) is incorporating heavy atoms (such as barium or iodine) through physical blends or polymer salt complexes. When synthesizing polyurethanes with heavy atoms, the major role is to build blocks of polymers with intrinsic radiopacity without a significant loss of mechanical and physical properties. There have been several studies where attempts at synthesizing intrinsically radiopaque polyurethanes were successful. For industrial purposes, lower cost, and higher demand, it seems that the incorporation of a ceramic or metallic contrast agent is more appropriate. Table 2 summarizes the synthesis and characterization of the radiopaque polyurethanes reported in the literature.
For all the mentioned polymers in Table 2, the synthesis method involves a reactor and specific time/temperature/pressure that is dependent on the monomers and the type of polymer being targeted. A brief explanation of the synthesis and the results obtained in Table 2 are described below. More details can be found in the respective references. Dawlee and Jayabalan [48] developed an aliphatic and aromatic polyurethane with inherent radiopacity and is bifunctionally active for blood-compatible applications. The synthesis methods for both PUs followed the conventional two-step solution polymerization using I-BOL as the chain extender, as schematized in Figure 5.
Both PUs were dissolved in dimethyl formamide (DMF) and cast to form films prior to characterizations. The FTIR analyses showed the presence of hydrogen-bonded N-H groups, which is essential for the microphase separation in PUs between the hard segments. Other important absorption bands were also described as the presence of C=O stretching (bonded) and N-H stretching (bonded), which is indicative of H bonding interactions between ether groups of the soft segments and the urethane amide in the hard segments. The GPC analysis indicated that the aromatic polyurethane showed higher molecular weight and polydispersity compared to the aliphatic one with a lower isocyanate index. By analyzing XRD, the authors claimed that crystalline regions were found only for the aliphatic PU. The absence of crystallinity for aromatic PU was attributed to the poor phase separation and steric hindrance of the hard segment. The presence of iodine atoms was confirmed by EDX for both polyurethanes but with a higher concentration for the aliphatic PU (attributed to its lower molecular weight), while the concentration was determined by elemental analyses (3% and 10%, for the aromatic and aliphatic, respectively). Both concentrations are sufficiently high for clinical monitoring. TGA showed a mass loss of almost 22% for the aliphatic polyurethane while only 5% mass loss was presented for the aromatic polyurethane at 260 °C due to the higher intermolecular bond strength for the latter. According to the DMTA results, the Tg difference was 8 °C. The lower temperature for the aliphatic polyurethane was attributed to the phase separation of the hard and soft segments. The aromatic polyurethane has more rigid domains but with mixed morphology, which led to a decrease in the chain flexibility of soft segments and hence a higher glass transition temperature. The tensile mechanical properties showed a higher tensile strength (35.75 MPa against 4.37 MPa), ultimate elongation (752.23% versus 482.78%), modulus (12.10 MPa versus 10.08 MPa), and toughness (106.87 MPa against 11.57 MPa) for the aromatic polyurethane. It is noteworthy to mention that the modulus values can be considered equal due to the standard error deviation. The higher values found for the aromatic polyurethane were attributed to an improvement of the cohesiveness and function as constituents of the urethane and phenyl groups for the secondary inter chain hydrogen bonding. Both polyurethanes were shown to be adequate for various biomedical applications. Regarding the radiopacity, both polyurethanes exhibited similar radiopacity to that of an aluminum wedge. The dynamic contact angle, which is important for biocompatibility, showed a surface reorganization in an aqueous medium that is more favored for the reorganization for aliphatic polyurethane. It was demonstrated to be non-cytotoxic for both polyurethanes for L929 mouse fibroblast cells around PU films, even after 24 h of contact, with cell viability of 83.9% and 111% metabolic activity for the aromatic and aliphatic polyurethanes, respectively. Finally, the blood compatibility showed no significant difference in the counts of RBC and WBC even after 30 min of exposure to human blood for the aromatic polyurethane. The blood compatibility for the aliphatic polyurethane was not tested due to the previous results presented. In general, the physical and mechanical properties of the neat polyurethanes decrease following the incorporation of a contrast agent, while the physical–mechanical, biological, and radiocontrast properties were not compromised.
Kiran et al. [49] synthesized and characterized iodinated polyurethanes with inherent radiopacity. The authors synthesized 4,40-isopropylidinedi(2,6-diiodophenol) (IBPA) and used it as a chain extender with MDI and PTMG through a two-step process polymerization at a molar ratio of 1:2.2:1.2, respectively. It produced two distinct polyurethanes named MTIB and MTB; the former was produced with IBPA as a chain extender and the latter was produced using Bisphenol-A (4,40-isopropylidenediphenol) (BPA) as a chain extender for comparative studies using the same aforementioned molar ratio. The chain extender was incorporated in the pre-polymer in the second stage of the synthesis using dibutyltin dilaurate as a catalyst. EDX and elemental analysis showed the presence of 23% iodine from IBPA. The X-radiograph of the MTIB was shown to be sharper compared to the MTB and aluminum standard, with a darker image than that of an aluminum wedge, while MTB was not all visible. The FTIR presented characteristic absorption bands of the formation of polyurethanes. The molecular weight of MTIB was lower compared to MTB due to the presence of bulky iodine atoms in IBPA, as demonstrated in GPC analysis. The TGA analysis showed two decomposition stages for both polyurethanes; for MTB, the decomposition temperature started at 260 °C, while for MTIB, the temperature was 220 °C. The glass transition temperature measured by DMTA showed similar results (around −33 °C) for both polymers. The non-cytotoxicity of MTIB was confirmed using L929 mouse fibroblast cells with 91% metabolically active cells compared to cells exposed to the extract of UHMWPE control. Figure 6 shows a schematic representation of the synthesis procedure performed by the authors.
Qu et al. [50] synthesized and characterized radiopaque poly(ether urethane) with iodine-containing diol as a chain extender, named IPEU following a two-step condensation polymerization process (Figure 7).
The IPEU contained poly(tetramethylene glycol) (PTMG) as the soft segment and MDI/N,N′-Bis(3-hydroxypropxyl)-2,3,5,6-tetraiodoterephthalamide (HPTDP) as the hard segment. HPTDP was synthesized by the authors. The authors compared the IPEU polyurethane with PEU (using the same reactants in the molar ratio of MDI:PTMG = 1:1, without a chain extender. The FTIR showed the expected functional groups for the polyurethanes, as the absorption peak at 1632 cm1 related to the NH-C=O stretching of HPTDP. Four different IPEU samples with different molar ratios of MDI/chain extended/ PTMG were incorporated in the study to verify the influence of the iodine-containing diol in the polyurethane. The molecular weight of the IPEU decreases following the incorporation of HPTDP due to the higher rigidity of this component in the polymer structure. The TGA analysis of IPEU showed two distinct decomposition stages (between 200 and 305 °C and between 305 and 450 °C). All IPEUs showed a similarity in the first decomposition stage, while for the second decomposition stage, a higher mass remained at higher temperatures by increasing the hard segment content. For PEU, the stability was maintained up to 343 °C with a mass loss of 50% at 386 °C. The authors claimed that all IPEUs have better thermal stability because only 5% mass loss occurred at 300 °C. DSC showed only one glass transition temperature for all polyurethanes studied, with higher values for IPEUs compared to PEU due to the hard segments of the MDI reagent. The presence of only one peak and not two, as commonly demonstrated in the literature, was attributed to the compatibility of the hard and soft segments in the amorphous phase. Breaking tensile strength and breaking tensile elongation were evaluated for all IPEU and were shown to be slightly higher by increasing the hard segment and the feed chain extender content. If one considers the standard deviation, the values of the breaking strength can be considered very close to each other. Higher values were directly associated with the higher molecular weight of the polyurethanes. The non-cytotoxicity of IPEU was confirmed using L929 mouse fibroblast cells. No morphological changes were observed by the authors. Figure 8 shows the morphology of the cells growing on the surface (scored as zero).
The radiopacity of the samples was evaluated by X-ray images. The IPEU images were sharper than PEU. The contrast increased with iodine content incorporation, and comparing with aluminum, good radiopaque properties for the higher iodine contents were found. The in vitro oxidative treatment was evaluated for 6 weeks while in vivo and reproduced the effect of one year within 24 days. For the IPEU samples, GPC analyses demonstrated a decrease in the molecular weight and increased polydispersity after oxidative treatment. After 6 weeks, the surface of IPEU showed degradation signals represented as large pits, which was attributed to the extraction of low molecular weight products resulting from chain scission.
Kiran and Joseph [51] produced radiopaque polyurethane for biomedical applications. The polyurethane (named XPU) was synthesized by reacting 1,6-diisocyanatohexane with poly(hexamethylene carbonate)diol and 2,2′-(2,5-diiodobenzene-1,4-diyl)bis(oxy)diethanol (DBD). DBD was synthesized using the iodinate hydroquinone bis(2-hydroxyethyl) ether as a chain extender. XPU was compared with barium sulfate-filled polyurethane as the control material containing 10–30 wt%) of the contrast agent (Figure 9).
FTIR spectra showed all the characteristic bands of polyurethane. EDX and ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy indicated the presence of 14.53% iodine. GPC of the polyurethane indicated that Mw, Mn, and polydispersity were 54,470, 30,900, and 1.76, respectively. The tensile strength was 5.2 MPa, fracture tensile strain was 66%, and toughness was 3.2 MPa, while the DMTA showed a glass transition of −21.1 °C. As claimed by the authors, the molecular weight showed higher values than reported cases, but the mechanical properties showed lower values due to the lower concentration of aromatic content in the polymer matrix. TGA showed a thermal stability up to 230 °C. The X-ray opacity of XPU was compared to polyurethanes containing barium sulfate (demonstrated in Figure 10). It is noted that XPU has an X-ray opacity equivalent to 15% barium sulfate polyurethane.
The cytotoxicity was tested on L929 mouse fibroblast cells using PVC as the positive control and HDPE as the negative control. The morphology of the cells growing on XPU was similar to the negative control, showing its non-cytotoxicity (demonstrated in Figure 11). It was demonstrated that 93% of the cells were metabolically active after 24 h of contact with UHMWPE. The in vitro hemocompatibility showed no significant difference in RBC counts before and after exposure, while a slight increase in WBC consumption was observed compared to the control. Finally, any leachable activator for the coagulation pathways was observed, indicating that the hemocompatible nature of polyurethanes was not affected.
Kiran et al. [52] developed polyurethane thermoplastic elastomers with inherent radiopacity using MDI, PPG/PCL/PHCD with IBPA as the chain extender. The polymerization was carried out by a two-step reaction process at a molar ratio of 2.2:1.2:1.0, respectively. The authors synthesized three different polyurethanes: MDI/PPG/IBPA (RPU1), MDI/PCL/IBPA (RPU2), and MDI/PHCD/IBPA (RPU3) (Figure 12).
The presence of iodine for all samples was confirmed by EDX and the content was confirmed by XRF (19.08%, 18.04%, and 18.80%, respectively). FTIR analysis showed the characteristics absorption bands for PU, indicating that the polymer synthetized is indeed polyurethane while the molecular weights varied for each synthesized PU due to the differences in the reactivity and chain stiffness of the polyols used. The contact angle results indicated lower results for RPU2 and RPU3 compared to RPU1 attributed to the greater number of polar functionalities presented in ester and carbonate linkages. TGA showed two main decomposition stages for all PUs, with RPU2 and RPU3 being thermically stable up to 220 °C, a temperature 120 °C higher compared to RPU1. Regarding the mechanical properties, toughness (77.74 MPa) was obtained for RPU2, higher elongation at break (803%) for RPU1, and higher tensile strength (41.2 MPa) and modulus (33.2 MPa) for RPU3. These results are indicative that the property is highly dependent on the type of polyol used. RPU1 results are due to the flexibility of the PPG segment, compared to stiffer groups (PCL and PHCD) that promote a close packing and increase the intermolecular forces, increasing the other properties analyzed. DMTA showed higher storage modulus for RPU3 (31.2 MPa) and Tg (7.4 °C) while it showed lower values for the storage modulus (1.95 MPa) for RPU1 and lower Tg (−21.3 °C) for RPU2. The storage modulus value was higher for RPU3 due to the higher stiffness of the chain backbone. The crystallization of RPU was prevented by the hard segment’s presence in RPUs, as demonstrated in XRD analysis. The X-ray opacity presented darker images for all RPUs compared to aluminum control, showing the availability for use in biomedical applications. Fluoroscopy image of RPU2 compared with that of polyurethane containing 20% barium sulfate showed identical radiopacity for both samples. In vitro, cell culture cytotoxicity performed on L929 mouse fibroblast cells indicated that the cells retained the original morphology even after 72 h of contact with RPUs. The quantitative cell viability presented approximately 81% metabolic activity for all RPUs.
Sang et al. [53] synthesized biodegradable radiopaque iodinated poly(ester urethane)s containing poly(ε-carpolactone) blocks, named I-PUs. I-PUs were synthesized from PCL diol, IPDI, and IBPA. The authors synthesized and incorporated IBPA containing four iodine atoms per molecule as a chain extender. The synthesis was performed by a two-step polymerization process (Figure 13). Three different molar ratios of PCL/IPDI/IBPA (1:2:1, 1:3:2, and 1:4:3), named as PU-121, PU-132, and PU-143, were studied.
The thermal behavior and crystallization of the polyurethanes were characterized by DSC, TGA, and XRD. PU-121 was the only sample to exhibit a crystallization peak in the cooling process at 1.3 °C and melting peaks at 43.1/47.9 °C. XRD demonstrated less sharp and undetectable peak intensities for PU-132 and PU-143, while two small intensity peaks were observed for PU-121. TGA curves showed a maximum decomposition temperature of 337, 323, and 313 °C for PU-121, PU-132, and PU-143, respectively. X-ray radiopacity showed that I-PUs were easily detected and clearly visible; by increasing the iodine content, a better contrast is observed. The in vitro enzymatic degradation test showed that all I-PUs presented a similar degradation profile: a constant mass loss over time followed by a rapid mass loss in the third month. The surface morphology (Figure 14) indicated a smooth and neat texture in the first two weeks, followed by small cracks and pits after five weeks, and observed surface erosions more and more manifest up to the ninth week, and finally, after three months, the surface texture was rough and highly porous with some caves and channels. The cytocompatibility was conducted using RaDSC to examine the cell viability and morphology. The I-PUs showed non-cytotoxicity and retained their original morphology.
Liaw [54] synthesized polyurethane elastomers based on polycaprolactone diol, polytetramethylene glycol, diphenyl methane 4,4 diisocyanate, dicyclohexyl methane 4,4 diisocyanate, and three different chain extenders: bisphenol-A, bisphenol-S, bisphenol-AF, and the respective brominated derivatives. The polymerization of the polyurethanes was carried out in a two-step procedure (Figure 15). Higher hardness and tensile strength were found for the polyester polyurethanes derived from bisphenols, while polyester urethanes presented smaller density values due to the higher flexibility and lower cohesive energy from ether linkages than ester linkages. The presence of the sulfone group increases the tensile strength of PU, which was corroborated by a decrease in the crystalline region, as visualized on XRD. The solvent absorption and swelling in water or benzene of polyether polyurethanes were higher compared to polyester polyurethanes. Bisphenol-AF-based PUs presented lower water absorption compared to other bisphenol-based polyurethanes. The thermal stability studied by TGA showed that the brominated bisphenol incorporation increases the thermal stability compared to the other polyurethanes due to the presence of aromatic rings. DMTA indicated that HMDI-based PUs have a higher temperature at the onset of the storage modulus and a lower modulus temperature and tanδ due to the formation of tight crystalline structures formed by long soft segments of HMDI combined with low molar mass diol. The incorporation of bromine atoms decreases the thermal stability due to the phase separation phenomena, which increases the free volume of the polymeric chain.
Sang et al. [55] produced iodinated poly(lactic acid)-polyurethane (I-PLAU) for chemoembolization therapy using IBPA as a chain extender. The polymerization process was carried out using a two-step process in two distinct molar ratios PLLA:IPDI:IBPA of 1:2:1 and 1:3:2, named I-PLAU-121 and I-PLAU-132, respectively (Figure 16).
GPC indicated a higher molecular weight for I-PLAU-121, while the iodine content was 13.1 wt%, and the iodine content for I-PLAU-132 was 7.5 wt%. The 1H NMR confirmed the I-PLAU copolymer synthesis. DSC demonstrated a glass transition temperature of 48 °C and 54.3 °C for I-PLAU-121 and I-PLAU-132, respectively. Also, a lower crystallinity and higher cold crystallization were obtained for the latter when compared to the former, as seen in XRD. The lower crystallinity was attributed to the higher amount of bulky iodine (which also promotes a higher steric hindrance) that affects the molecular symmetry of the polymeric chain reducing the chain packing. The in vitro radiopacity for both samples showed sufficient radiopacity when compared to the aluminum control. The hemocompatibility of both film samples was tested via platelet adhesion using SEM images. For I-PLAU-121, a discoid shape was observed, while for I-PLAU-132, flattened and irregular shapes are noted, which can be indicative of thrombus formation (Figure 17a,b). The static contact angle was measured and showed a contact angle of θ = 78.9° and θ = 84.6° for the aforementioned samples, indicating that both polyurethanes can act as coagulation agents and induce blood coagulation (Figure 17c,d).
The in vitro cytotoxicity indicated no difference in the iodine content on human adipose stem cells with a relative growth rate of 92.33% for I-PLAU-121 and 93.12% for I-PLAU-132. After 72 h, the values decrease by 85.75% and 83.33% for the samples, respectively. The histological analysis of the in vivo intramuscular implantation was performed using I-PLAU-132 for up to 4 weeks. Even after 4 weeks of implantation, the tissue around the PU sample showed no evidence of any macroscopic abnormalities, indicating acceptable biocompatibility and biodegradability. The authors also prepared and characterized I-PLAU/DOX beads by the emulsion/solvent evaporation method, obtaining a spherical reddish color. By SEM, it was observed that a tightened surface and nonporous internal structure for I-PLAU-121/DOX beads were observed, while some pores with irregular size and shape were noted for I-PLAU-132/DOX beads. This difference was attributed to the increase in the iodinated chain extender. The drug encapsulation efficiency (DEE) was 68% for I-PLAU-121/DOX beads and of 43% for I-PLAU-132/DOX beads due to the porosity of the bead. The cumulative release of DOX-loaded beads was similar for both polyurethanes in the first 5 days. After, I-PLAU-132/DOX beads showed higher cumulative release (almost 80%) compared to 40% for I-PLAU-121/DOX beads after 30 days. The anti-cancer cell viability Hela cells showed that the porous structure of I-PLAU-132/DOX beads had a slightly stronger effect than the nonporous structure of I-PLAU-121/DOX beads. In both cases, the proliferation of Hela cells is suppressed by a continuous release of the beads.
Shiralizadeh et al. [56] synthetized a radiopaque polyurethane-urea (PUU) with graphene oxide using 4-(4-iodophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione (IUr) as a chain extender. The synthesis was carried out using MDI, PEG, and IUr. The MDI/PEG prepolymer was prepared and IUr was added to the solution followed by the incorporation of graphene oxide (GO) (two-step polyaddition reaction). Six different samples were analyzed by the author, named PUU-IUr using 4-(4-iodophenyl)-1,2,4 triazolidine-3,5-dione as the chain extender; PUU–PhUr using 4-phenyl-1,2,4 triazolidine-3,5-dione as the chain extender; and PUU-IUr-0.1, PUU-IUr-0.2, PUU-IUr-0.5, and PUU-IUr-1, incorporating GO with the respective chain extender and Go (wt%). For example, PUU-IUr-0.5 contains 0.5wt% GO and IUr as the chain extender (Figure 18).
FTIR spectroscopy showed the expected absorption bands, showing that the final material is indeed PU, which was also corroborated by NMR spectroscopy. The elemental analysis estimated the C, H, N, and O amounts in PUU-IUr and PUU-PhUr. The results showed that the experimental values were close to the calculated ones—C (54.85 and 59.58), H (6.12 and 6.23), O (27.05 and 28.34), N (5.54 and 6.58), and I (6.93 and 0) for PUU-IUr and PUU-PhUr, respectively. The incorporation of GO proved to be well dispersed, not altering the arrangement of the polymeric chains, as demonstrated by XRD. The authors attribute the dispersion to the bulky iodine atoms on the pendant group of the polymer, which apart the polymeric chains and allow GO to be penetrated into the polymer gallery. TGA curves showed two decomposition stages for all samples at 270 and 520 °C, attributed to urethane and urea linkages and the polyol, respectively. The storage modulus and the tan δ curves from DMTA showed that GO increased the storage modulus (desirable compatibility and strong hydrogen bonding interactions) and Tg from tan δ, indicating a restriction in the molecular chain mobility by adding GO. FE-SEM analysis showed that GO was well dispersed into the polymeric matrix, corroborating the XRD results, but at higher GO concentrations, agglomerations could be observed. X-radiography showed an excellent radiopacity for the iodine samples, being unaffected by GO. Finally, the cytotoxicity showed an inverse effect on the fibroblast cells’ viability.
Wang et al. [57] synthesized polycaprolactone-polyurethane (I-PCLUs) via the chain extender method, using PCL, IPDI, and IBPA at two molar ratios (1:2:1 and 1:3:2), named as I-PCLU-121 and I-PCLU-132, respectively. After, the polymers and free dox in water were prepared using a W1/O/W2 double-emulsion method in a PVA solution, forming polymeric beads (Figure 19).
The drug release and in vitro anti-tumor effect were evaluated for the I-PCLU beads. It was observed that the spherical format of the beads was maintained with a relatively high drug-loading in the shell layer of beads promoted by the diffusion of DOX into the water phase during preparation. A higher fluorescent intensity and drug-loading were observed for I-PCLU-132/DOX due to the smaller pores and thicker shell structure. The X-ray visibility was maintained after drug release with a sustained release mode for four weeks for both ratios of I-PCLU/Dox. The bioactivity was retained, as observed in the in vitro cancer cell viability, which inhibits the tumor cell proliferation. The proposed formulation proposed by the authors showed to be effective in muscle implantation (as demonstrated in Figure 20), being easily injected as an aqueous solution and promoting an effective chemoembolization effect by restricting tumor growth.
Egorikhina et al. [58] studied the biological characteristics of four different polyurethane-based bone-replacement materials, described as Composition 1 (PPG, MDI, glycerol), Composition 2 (PPG, MDI, glycerol, bismuth oxide (15 wt%), Composition 3 (PPG, MDI, glycerol, tantalum pentoxide (15 wt%)), and Composition 4 (PPG, MDI, glycerol, zirconium oxide (15 wt%)). The polymers were synthesized in two stages: first, MDI and PPG prepolymer were prepared, followed by the addition of glycerol and a contrast agent (Figure 21).
The samples Composition 1 and Composition 4 showed non-toxicity after 1- and 7-day extract while Composition 2 showed mild toxicity levels after both periods. The toxicity level of Composition 3 was shown to be variable. The interaction between cells and the polymers was also monitored. After 24 h, Composition 1 presented cell adhesion to the specimen surface and a fairly uniform distribution of the cells. After 72 h, the number of stained cell nuclei increased but only 50% of the cells were spindle-shaped (which indicates good adhesion to the specimen surface). The incorporation of bismuth (Composition 2) increases the cytotoxicity with less evenly distributed cells on the surface of the polymer. Composition 3 (containing tantalum) showed a zero to mild degree after 1 day and a medium degree after 7 days of incubation with cells distributed unevenly as small colonies. Finally, Composition 4 (containing zirconium) was non-toxic after 1- and 7-day extraction but no adherent morphology was observed on the polymeric surface within 3 days. The authors claimed that different contrast agents act differently in the distribution and sizes of the pores in their structure.
Kiran et al. [59] synthesized radiopaque polyurethanes (XPU) using H12MDI, PHCD, and a synthesized IBPA in the molar ratio 2.2:1.2:1.0. After, XPU was converted into microspheres (XPM) with different sizes (obtained at a stirring speed of 500, 750, and 1000 rpm) (Figure 22).
XPU was characterized by FTIR, GPC, and TGA. The characteristic absorption bands of polyurethane were observed in FTIR, confirming that the material formed is indeed PU. GPC showed a mass average molecular mass of 39,600 and a number average molar mass of 21,000. A thermal stability of 230 °C was observed by TGA. The microspheres (XPM) obtained at 500, 750, and 1000 rpm showed an average diameter of 500, 360, and 230 μm, respectively. The iodine content was 23.6% (confirmed by elemental analysis and elucidated by EDX). The cytocompatibility of microspheres was evaluated using L929 mouse fibroblast cells. After 24 h, the cells retained their original morphology, indicating the non-toxicity of the XPM. The metabolic activity showed to be 92, 91, and 94% for the diameters of 230, 360, and 500 μm, also confirming the non-toxicity of the microspheres. In vitro degradation (PBS solution of pH 7.4 at 37 °C) with the percentage mass loss remained at several points. Also, degradation studies showed no mass loss after 30 days. Finally, The X-ray image was performed by inserting the microspheres into the leg of the rabbit cadaver. An easier visualization of the radiopaque material was noted, validating the radiopacity effect of the synthesized material.
Sang et al. [60] synthesized biodegradable iodinated polyurethanes (I-PUs) using PCL, IPDI, and IBPA with two molar ratios (1:2:1, 1:3:2) coded as I-PU-121 and I-PU-132. The chain extender (IBPA) was synthesized by the authors (Figure 23).
The results were compared to a noniodinated polyurethane (coded as PU-C) using BPA as a chain extender. The enzymatic degradation was evaluated regarding the mass loss. Within 2 weeks, the mass loss of the three samples was lower than 12%. After 6 weeks, the lipase diffuses into the interior of the samples and accelerates degradation, promoting a sharp increase in mass loss. After 3 months a higher degradation was observed for PU-C (60.8%), followed by I-PU-121 (47.1%) and I-PI-132 (38.2%). These results showed the improvement of the enzymatic resistance by the incorporation of the iodine-containing agent. Optical images showed that all polyurethanes changed from dark to pale yellow after 3-month incubation in lipase media. All samples showed to be brittle in this period. The authors claimed that the color change observed for I-PUs are indicative of better enzymatic degradation compared to PU-C. X-ray opacity showed a dark image with clear profiles for the iodinated polyurethanes compared to the noniodinated control samples (PU-C). SEM images showed that after 3-month degradation, PU-C films showed an eroded surface, while I-PUs showed some pits and dimples, suggesting that the iodine helps to delay degradation. EDX indicated an iodine content of 8.6 and 12.3% for I-PU-121 and I-PU-132, respectively, even after 3-month degradation. DSC analyses were conducted in three different conditions > initial, after 9 weeks, and after 3 months. PU-C and I-PU-121 showed no significant differences regarding the melting temperature and the melting enthalpy; both increased for the former and slightly decreased for the latter with time. For I-PU-132, the melting peaks appeared only after 9 weeks, suggesting that PCL chains can rearrange themselves during degradation. XRD confirmed that bulky iodine incorporation has difficult chain packing and hence crystallization. The static contact angle in water showed values of 76.8° for I-PU-121, 83.6° for I-PU-132, and 68.6° for PU-C, demonstrating changes in the hydrophobicity by incorporating iodine atoms into the polymeric chains. Higher values for the contact angle were obtained by increasing the period of degradation.

4. Limitations and Challenges

Considering that most applications are related to biomedical applications, the limitations can be enumerated mainly as biocompatibility, mechanical properties, radioactivity, cytotoxicity, and cost. All the materials used for radiopacity must be biocompatible to ensure an appropriate response in a specific application, guarantee patient safety and comfort, and minimize side effects in the human body. The medical advice must retain its integrity, whether for hard or flexible parts; hence, the mechanical properties resulting from the incorporation of a radiopacifying agent (as a nanoparticle or as part of the polymeric chain) have to be maintained for a determined application. The studies pointed out that some mechanical properties decrease by incorporating the radiopacifier agent. The radioactivity is related to the atomic number of the radiopacifier agent and concentration, which corresponds to the specific structure in which the material will be inserted into the human body. The cytotoxicity needs to be extensively studied [61], but some studies using barium sulfate have already been successfully applied to prevent biological reactions. In some cases, it is recommended to use cross-linking techniques to maintain the inorganic filler in the medical device to avoid (or reduce) the mitigation of the contrast agent. Finally, the overall cost of the final part is important because it provides commercial viability.
The synthesis challenges arise in achieving industrial-scale production while maintaining the same parameter control in bench synthesis. There is a need to develop novel, cheap, and alternative economic sources, such as biodegradable polyurethanes or polyurethanes from renewable sources, to produce environmentally friendly products. Also, depending on the application, a higher viscosity/lower fluidity is required in the process, which considerably changes the synthesis route/conditions. Regarding medical applications, it is expected that the incorporation of the radiopacifier elements will result in similar mechanical properties compared to the neat polymer, either by optimizing the synthesis parameters or by developing new layouts of the final product. Also, it is expected that, besides biocompatibility, other properties such as bioactivity, biodegradability, and regeneration, depending on the exposure time of the medical device, will be considered in the application. Also, the manufacturing of radiopaque polyurethanes to respond to different environmental stimuli can be of great importance in human body applications.
Radiopaque materials can be optimized by layering techniques or computational modeling. Layering techniques consist of concentrating the radiopacity in specific regions where it is most necessary, while computational modeling allows for the simulation and optimization of the distribution of radiopaque materials within the device, ensuring efficient use of the materials for the maximum radiopacity requirement. It is also worth mentioning materials that require only temporary radiopacity, as in the case of implants such as stents or contrast agents that are eliminated by the renal system, such as iohexol, for example. An important issue is that some contrast agents such as ferric oxide can promote the stimulation of bone growth.
The radiopacity can be ensured either by including high-atomic-number elements such as metals, or by incorporating these elements as part of the polymeric chain, such as iodine. Some examples of metals widely used in implants and catheters are gold and platinum, which ensure excellent radiopacity, biocompatibility, stability, and corrosion resistance, contributing to the long-term reliability of these materials for biomedical applications. When inorganic metallic compounds or organic compounds are incorporated into the polymeric matrix, the physical blending of the contrast agent (the most prevalent and economical method) has some drawbacks such as poor homogeneity, which can lead to the incorporation of a higher amount of the agent. This poor homogeneity can be improved by including soluble radiopacity agents in the polymeric matrix, which also results in a lower amount of the agent for the same level of radiopacity.
Recent advances in science and technology have allowed the fabrication of tailor-made materials at the nanoscale and the use of 3D printing for the fabrication of radiopaque materials. Continued research and innovation will allow more balanced properties among radiopacity, mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and cost, ultimately improving patient outcomes in diagnostic and interventional procedures.

5. Conclusions

This mini-review demonstrates the effect of the concentration, type, and format of different nanoparticles on the radiopacity of polyurethane. It was found that barium sulfate and iodinated compounds are the most clinically administered radiopaque agents.
One of the main characteristics is the cost-effectiveness and tailor-made properties that can be achieved compared to conventional materials. The synthetization of radiopaque polyurethanes is not only possible, as referenced here, but it has been observed that radiopaque PUs are more efficiently synthesized with heavy atoms with a high electron density as part of the back chain bone or when grafted. The synthetization of polyurethanes with biocompatible, low-cytotoxicity, and high-electron-density composites or atoms produces a radiopaque and antimicrobial material without the downsides of incorporating nanoparticles in the processing steps of the product and enables multipurpose use in biomedical applications.
It is worth mentioning that physical blending is the most prevalent and economical method to induce radiopacity in polymers. However, the resultant mixture often lacks homogeneity and nanoparticle agglomeration, which compromises the radiopacity. To minimize this drawback, a higher concentration of the nanoparticle is required. Of course, surface-modifying agents can be used to improve dispersion. Also, a higher radiopacity can be used if the contrast agent is soluble, which provides a homogeneous distribution between the phases and allows the use of a lower concentration of the contrast agent than surface modification for the same level of radiopacity. The recommendation is that the amount of contrast agent must be as low as possible to provide an acceptable radioactivity and mechanical properties. It is important to keep in mind that the radiopacity has to be coherent (visible enough) with the respective anatomical structures of different tissues.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L.O.J.; validation, H.L.O.J. and J.G.; formal analysis, H.L.O.J.; investigation, H.L.O.J.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.O.J. and J.G.; writing—review and editing, H.L.O.J. and J.G.; visualization, H.L.O.J. and J.G.; supervision, H.L.O.J.; project administration, H.L.O.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Das, A.; Mahanwar, P. A Brief Discussion on Advances in Polyurethane Applications. Adv. Ind. Eng. Polym. Res. 2020, 3, 93–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wienen, D.; Gries, T.; Cooper, S.L.; Heath, D.E. An Overview of Polyurethane Biomaterials and Their Use in Drug Delivery. J. Control Release 2023, 363, 376–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Dall Agnol, L.; Ornaghi, H.L., Jr.; Monticeli, F.; Trindade, F.; Bianchi, O. Polyurethanes Synthetized with Polyols of Distinct Molar Masses: Use of the Artificial Neural Network for Prediction of Degree of Polymerization. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2021, 61, 1810–1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Alves, F.C.; Vanessa; Monticeli, F.M.; Ornaghi, H.; Barud, S.; Mulinari, D.R. Efficiency of Castor Oil–Based Polyurethane Foams for Oil Sorption S10 and S500: Influence of Porous Size and Statistical Analysis. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2021, 29, S1063–S1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ourique, P.A.; Ornaghi, F.G.; Ornaghi, H.L., Jr.; Wanke, C.H.; Bianchi, O. Thermo-oxidative degradation kinetics of renewable hybrid polyurethane-urea obtained from air-oxidized soybean oil. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 137, 1969–1979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dall Agnol, L.; Ornaghi, H.L., Jr.; Neves, R.M.; Monticeli, F.M. Dynamic mechanical and thermogravimetric properties of synthetized polyurethanes. Polym. Bull. 2023, 80, 4181–4194. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wendels, S.; Avérous, L. Biobased Polyurethanes for Biomedical Applications. Bioact. Mater. 2021, 6, 1083–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Trhlíková, O.; Vlčková, V.; Abbrent, S.; Valešová, K.; Kanizsová, L.; Skleničková, K.; Paruzel, A.; Bujok, S.; Walterová, Z.; Innemanová, P.; et al. Microbial and Abiotic Degradation of Fully Aliphatic Polyurethane Foam Suitable for Biotechnologies. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2021, 194, 109764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Specialty Chemicals—The Lubrizol Corporation. Lubrizol.com. Available online: https://www.lubrizol.com/ (accessed on 22 January 2024).
  10. Medical Polyurethanes. @Biomedical. Available online: https://www.dsm.com/biomedical/en_US/biomaterials-solutions/medical-polyurethanes.html (accessed on 22 January 2024).
  11. Medical Polyurethane Market Research Report: Market Size, Industry Outlook, Market Forecast, Demand Analysis, Market Share, Market Report 2021–2026. Available online: https://www.industryarc.com/Report/18850/medical-polyurethane-market (accessed on 22 January 2024).
  12. Tian, L.; Lu, L.; Feng, J.; Melancon, M.P. Radiopaque nano and polymeric materials for atherosclerosis imaging, embolization and other catheterization procedures. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2018, 8, 360–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yaylaci, A.; Karaarslan, E.S.; Hatirli, H. Evaluation of the radiopacity of restorative materials with different structures and thicknesses using a digital radiography system. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2021, 51, 261–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ochoa-Rodríguez, V.M.; Homero, J.; Roma, B.; Coaguila-Llerena, H.; Tanomaru-Filho, M.; Gonçalves, A.; Spin-Neto, R.; Faria, G. Radiopacity of Endodontic Materials Using Two Models for Conversion to Millimeters of Aluminum. Braz. Oral. Res. 2020, 34, e080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Dantas, R.V.F.; Sarmento, H.R.; Duarte, R.M.; Raso, S.S.M.M.; de Andrade, A.K.M.; Anjos-Pontual, M.L. Radiopacity of restorative composites by conventional radiograph and digital images with different resolutions. Imaging Sci. Dent. 2013, 43, 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Valizadeh, S.; Tavakoli, M.A.; Zarabian, T.; Esmaeili, F. Diagnostic Accuracy of Digitized Conventional Radiographs by Camera and Scanner in Detection of Proximal Caries. J. Dent. Res. Dent. Clin. Dent. Prospects 2009, 3, 126–131. [Google Scholar]
  17. de Paiva, M.A.A.; Mangueira Leite, D.F.B.; Farias, I.A.P.; de Costa, A.P.C.; Sampaio, F.C. Dental Anatomical Features and Caries: A Relationship to Be Investigated. In Dental Anatomy, 1st ed.; Kivanç, B.H., Ed.; Intechopen: London, UK, 2018; pp. 61–84. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bryant, J.A.; Drage, N.A.; Richmond, S. CT Number Definition. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 358–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sneha, K.R.; Sailaja, G.S. Intrinsically Radiopaque Biomaterial Assortments: A Short Review on the Physical Principles, X-ray Imageability, and State-of-the-Art Developments. J. Mater. Chem. B 2021, 9, 8569–8593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lusic, H.; Grinstaff, M.W. X-ray-Computed Tomography Contrast Agents. Chem. Rev. 2012, 113, 1641–1666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Berger, M.; Yang, Q.; Maier, A. X-ray Imaging. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2018, 119–145. [Google Scholar]
  22. Alcântara, A.C.S.; Assis, I.; Prada, D.; Mehle, K.; Schwan, S.; Costa-Paiva, L.; Skaf, M.S.; Wrobel, L.C.; Sollero, P. Patient-Specific Bone Multiscale Modelling, Fracture Simulation and Risk Analysis—A Survey. Materials 2019, 13, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Emonde, C.K.; Eggers, M.-E.; Wichmann, M.; Hurschler, C.; Ettinger, M.; Denkena, B. Radiopacity Enhancements in Polymeric Implant Biomaterials: A Comprehensive Literature Review. ACS Biomat Sci. Eng. 2024, 10, 1323–1334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kjellson, F.; Almén, T.; Tanner, K.E.; McCarthy, I.D.; Lidgren, L. Bone Cement X-ray Contrast Media: A Clinically Relevant Method of Measuring Their Efficacy. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.-B Appl. Biomater. 2004, 70, 354–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, J.S.; Diaz, J.; Sabokbar, A.; Athanasou, N.; Kjellson, F.; Tanner, K.E.; McCarthy, I.D.; Lidgren, L. In Vitro and in Vivo Biological Responses to a Novel Radiopacifying Agent for Bone Cement. J. R. Soc. Interface 2005, 2, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Manero, J.M.; Ginebra, M.P.; Gil, F.J.; Planell, J.A.; Delgado, J.A.; Morejon, L.; Artola, A.; Gurruchaga, M.; Goñi, I. Propagation of Fatigue Cracks in Acrylic Bone Cements Containing Different Radiopaque Agents. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part H Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H 2004, 218, 167–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Lieberman, I.H.; Togawa, D.; Kayanja, M.M. Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Filler Materials. Spine J. 2005, 5, S305–S316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Pepiol, A.; Teixidor, F.; Saralidze, K.; van der Marel, C.; Willems, P.; Voss, L.; Knetsch, M.L.W.; Vinas, C.; Koole, L.H. A Highly Radiopaque Vertebroplasty Cement Using Tetraiodinated O-Carborane Additive. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 6389–6398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bitsch, R.G.; Kretzer, J.P.; Vogt, S.; Büchner, H.; Thomsen, M.N.; Lehner, B. Increased Antibiotic Release and Equivalent Biomechanics of a Spacer Cement without Hard Radio Contrast Agents. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2015, 83, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Gillani, R.; Ercan, B.; Qiao, A.; Webster, T.J. Nanofunctionalized Zirconia and Barium Sulfate Particles as Bone Cement Additives. Int. J. Nanomed. 2009, 2, 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  31. Park, J.-S.; Yim, K.H.; Jeong, S.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, D.G. A Novel High-Visibility Radiopaque Tantalum Marker for Biliary Self-Expandable Metal Stents. Medicine 2019, 13, 366–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chan, W.A.; Bini, T.B.; Venkatraman, S.S.; Boey, F.Y.C. Effect of Radio-Opaque Filler on Biodegradable Stent Properties. J Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2006, 79A, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Choi, S.Y.; Hur, W.; Kim, B.K.; Shasteen, C.; Kim, M.H.; Choi, L.M.; Lee, S.H.; Park, C.G.; Park, M.; Min, H.S.; et al. Bioabsorbable Bone Fixation Plates for X-ray Imaging Diagnosis by a Radiopaque Layer of Barium Sulfate and Poly(Lactic-Co-Glycolic Acid). J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part B Appl. Biomater. 2014, 103, 596–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zaribaf, F.P.; Gill, H.S.; Pegg, E.C. Characterisation of the Physical, Chemical and Mechanical Properties of a Radiopaque Polyethylene. J. Biomater. Appl. 2020, 35, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wang, Q.; Yu, X.; Chen, X.; Gao, J.; Shi, D.; Shen, Y.; Tang, J.; He, J.; Li, A.; Yu, L.; et al. A Facile Composite Strategy to Prepare a Biodegradable Polymer Based Radiopaque Raw Material for “Visualizable” Biomedical Implants. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 24197–24212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Le Ferrec, M.; Mellier, C.; Boukhechba, F.; Le Corroller, T.; Guenoun, D.; Fayon, F.; Montouillout, V.; Despas, C.; Walcarius, A.; Massiot, D.; et al. Design and Properties of a Novel Radiopaque Injectable Apatitic Calcium Phosphate Cement, Suitable for Image-Guided Implantation. J. Biomed. Mater. Res.-B Appl. 2017, 106, 2786–2795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. A Novel, Radiopaque, Bioresorbable Tyrosine-Derived Polymer for Cardiovascular Scaffolds. Available online: https://citoday.com/articles/2018-july-aug/a-novel-radiopaque-bioresorbable-tyrosine-derived-polymer-for-cardiovascular-scaffolds (accessed on 15 July 2024).
  38. Dukic, W. Radiopacity of Composite Luting Cements Using a Digital Technique. J. Prosthodont. 2017, 28, e450–e459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Mueller, U.; Reinders, J.; Smith-Romanski, S.; Kretzer, J.P. Wear Performance of Calcium Carbonate-Containing Knee Spacers. Materials 2017, 10, 805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Deb, S.; Abdulghani, S.; Behiri, J.C. Radiopacity in Bone Cements Using an Organo-Bismuth Compound. Biomaterials 2002, 23, 3387–3393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Roth, A.K.; Boon-Ceelen, K.; Smelt, H.; van Rietbergen, B.; Willems, P.; van Rhijn, L.W.; Arts, J.J. Radiopaque UHMWPE Sublaminar Cables for Spinal Deformity Correction: Preclinical Mechanical and Radiopacifier Leaching Assessment. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B 2017, 106, 771–779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Bogie, R.; Roth, A.K.; de Faber, S.; de Jong, J.J.A.; Welting, T.; Willems, P.; Arts, J.J.; van Rhijn, L.W. Novel Radiopaque Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Sublaminar Wires in a Growth-Guidance System for the Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis. Spine 2014, 39, E1503–E1509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kozakiewicz, M.; Olbrzymek, L.; Stefanczyk, L.; Olszycki, M.; Komorowski, P.; Walkowiak, B.; Konieczny, B.; Krasowski, M.; Sokołowski, J. Radio-Opaque Polyethylene for Personalized Craniomaxillofacial Implants. Clin. Oral. Investig. 2016, 21, 1853–1859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Chang, W.J.; Pan, Y.H.; Tzeng, J.J.; Wu, T.L.; Fong, T.H.; Feng, S.W.; Huang, H.M. Development and Testing of X-ray Imaging-Enhanced Poly-L-Lactide Bone Screws. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0140354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kim, G.B.; Guo, J.; Hu, J.; Shan, D.; Yang, J. Novel Applications of Urethane/Urea Chemistry in the Field of Biomaterials. In Advances in Polyurethane Biomaterials, 1st ed.; Cooper, S.L., Guan, J., Eds.; Woodhead Publishing: Cambridge, UK, 2016; pp. 115–147. [Google Scholar]
  46. Dawlee, S.; Jayabalan, M. Intrinsically Radiopaque Polyurethanes with Chain Extender 4,4′-Isopropylidenebis [2-(2,6-Diiodophenoxy)Ethanol] for Biomedical Applications. J. Biomaterials Appl. 2014, 29, 1329–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. James, N.; Philip, J.; Jayakrishnan, A. Polyurethanes with Radiopaque Properties. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Dawlee, S.; Jayabalan, M. Development of Segmented Polyurethane Elastomers with Low Iodine Content Exhibiting Radiopacity and Blood Compatibility. Biomed. Mater. 2011, 6, 055002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kiran, S.; James, N.R.; Joseph, R.; Jayakrishnan, A. Synthesis and Characterization of Iodinated Polyurethane with Inherent Radiopacity. Biomaterials 2009, 30, 5552–5559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Qu, W.; Xia, W.; Feng, C.; Tuo, X.; Qiu, T. Synthesis and Characterization of Radiopaque Poly(Ether Urethane) with Iodine-Containing Diol as Chain Extender. J. Polym. Sci. A Polym. Chem. 2011, 49, 2191–2198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kiran, S.; Joseph, R. Synthesis and Characterization of a Noncytotoxic, X-ray Opaque Polyurethane Containing Iodinated Hydroquinone Bis(2-Hydroxyethyl) Ether as Chain Extender for Biomedical Applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013, 102, 3207–3215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kiran, S.; James, N.R.; Jayakrishnan, A.; Joseph, R. Polyurethane Thermoplastic Elastomers with Inherent radiopacity for Biomedical Applications. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2012, 100A, 3472–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Sang, L.; Wei, Z.; Liu, K.; Wang, X.; Song, K.; Wang, H.; Qi, M. Biodegradable Radiopaque Iodinated Poly(Ester Urethane)S Containing Poly(ε-Caprolactone) Blocks: Synthesis, Characterization, and Biocompatibility. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A 2013, 102, 1121–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Liaw, D.-J. The Relative Physical and Thermal Properties of Polyurethane Elastomers: Effect of Chain Extenders of Bisphenols, Diisocyanate, and Polyol Structures. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 1997, 66, 1251–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sang, L.; Luo, D.; Wei, Z.; Qi, M. X-ray Visible and Doxorubicin-Loaded Beads Based on Inherently Radiopaque Poly(Lactic Acid)-Polyurethane for Chemoembolization Therapy. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Biomim. Mater. Sens. Syst. 2017, 75, 1389–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shiralizadeh, S.; Nasr-Isfahani, H.; Keivanloo, A.; Bakherad, M.; Yahyaei, B.; Pourali, P. Preparation of radiopaque polyurethane–urea/graphene oxide nanocomposite using 4-(4-iodophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 9896–9912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Wang, W.; Sang, L.; Zhao, Y.; Wei, Z.; Qi, M.; Li, Y. Inherently radiopaque polyurethane beads as potential multifunctional embolic agent in hepatocellular carcinoma therapy. J. Mater. Sci. Tech. 2021, 63, 106–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Egorikhina, M.N.; Bokov, A.E.; Charykova, I.N.; Rubtsova, Y.P.; Linkova, D.D.; Kobyakova, I.I.; Farafontova, E.A.; Kalinina, S.Y.; Kolmogorov, Y.N.; Aleynik, D.Y. Biological Characteristics of Polyurethane-Based Bone-Replacement Materials. Polymers 2023, 15, 831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kiran, S.; Sunny, M.C.; Joseph, R. Inherently X-ray opaque polyurethane microspheres for biomedical applications. Int. J. Polym. Mater. Polym. Biomater. 2016, 66, 213–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sang, L.; Wei, Z.; Zhai, L.; Wang, H.; Qi, M. Enzymatic degradation and radiopaque attenuation of iodinated poly(ester-urethane)s with inherent radiopacity. J. Mater. Sci. 2014, 49, 7834–7843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Attarilar, S.; Yang, J.; Ebrahimi, M.; Wang, Q.; Liu, J.; Tang, Y.; Yang, J. The Toxicity Phenomenon and the Related Occurrence in Metal and Metal Oxide Nanoparticles: A Brief Review from the Biomedical Perspective. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2020, 8, 822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Different applications of polyurethane for the biomedical industry.
Scheme 1. Different applications of polyurethane for the biomedical industry.
Jcs 08 00409 sch001
Figure 1. Hounsfield scale for different materials presented in the human body. The figure was used under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license from [22].
Figure 1. Hounsfield scale for different materials presented in the human body. The figure was used under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license from [22].
Jcs 08 00409 g001
Figure 2. Arm showing fractures in radiographic images, the corresponding color image after surgery, and the radiographic images after fixation of the bones using metal rods. The image was used under the Creative Commons License from [21].
Figure 2. Arm showing fractures in radiographic images, the corresponding color image after surgery, and the radiographic images after fixation of the bones using metal rods. The image was used under the Creative Commons License from [21].
Jcs 08 00409 g002
Figure 3. (A) Digital radiograph of radiolucent UHMWPE cable (1), UHMWPE cable incorporated with Bi2O3 particles in different views (2–4) and a titanium cable (5–6) relative to an aluminum step wedge (B) radiograph of the radiopaque UHMWPE cable implanted in a sheep spine, indicated by the white arrows. The images were taken from [23] under CC-BY 4.0 license.
Figure 3. (A) Digital radiograph of radiolucent UHMWPE cable (1), UHMWPE cable incorporated with Bi2O3 particles in different views (2–4) and a titanium cable (5–6) relative to an aluminum step wedge (B) radiograph of the radiopaque UHMWPE cable implanted in a sheep spine, indicated by the white arrows. The images were taken from [23] under CC-BY 4.0 license.
Jcs 08 00409 g003
Figure 4. Micro-CT images of radiolucent PLLA bone screws (a,c) and radiopaque PLLA + 20 wt%. Fe2O3 particles (b,d) at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, were implanted in white rabbits. The images were taken from [23] under CC-BY 4.0 license.
Figure 4. Micro-CT images of radiolucent PLLA bone screws (a,c) and radiopaque PLLA + 20 wt%. Fe2O3 particles (b,d) at 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, were implanted in white rabbits. The images were taken from [23] under CC-BY 4.0 license.
Jcs 08 00409 g004
Figure 5. PU synthesis schematization according to Dawlee and Jayabalan [48].
Figure 5. PU synthesis schematization according to Dawlee and Jayabalan [48].
Jcs 08 00409 g005
Figure 6. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran et al. [49].
Figure 6. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran et al. [49].
Jcs 08 00409 g006
Figure 7. PU synthesis schematization according to Qu et al. [50].
Figure 7. PU synthesis schematization according to Qu et al. [50].
Jcs 08 00409 g007
Figure 8. L929 mouse fibroblast cells around IPEU containing the molar ratio of MDI:chain extender:PTMG = 1.4:0:4:1. The figure was used under kind permission from [50].
Figure 8. L929 mouse fibroblast cells around IPEU containing the molar ratio of MDI:chain extender:PTMG = 1.4:0:4:1. The figure was used under kind permission from [50].
Jcs 08 00409 g008
Figure 9. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran and Joseph [51].
Figure 9. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran and Joseph [51].
Jcs 08 00409 g009
Figure 10. X-ray images of the polyurethanes studied. The figure was used under kind permission from [51].
Figure 10. X-ray images of the polyurethanes studied. The figure was used under kind permission from [51].
Jcs 08 00409 g010
Figure 11. Optical microscopic images of L929 cells grown in vitro on (A) PVC (positive control), (B) HDPE (negative control), and (C) XPU. Images were taken after exposing the materials to cells for 24 h. The figure was used with kind permission from [51].
Figure 11. Optical microscopic images of L929 cells grown in vitro on (A) PVC (positive control), (B) HDPE (negative control), and (C) XPU. Images were taken after exposing the materials to cells for 24 h. The figure was used with kind permission from [51].
Jcs 08 00409 g011
Figure 12. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran et al. [52].
Figure 12. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran et al. [52].
Jcs 08 00409 g012
Figure 13. PU synthesis schematization according to Sang et al. [53].
Figure 13. PU synthesis schematization according to Sang et al. [53].
Jcs 08 00409 g013
Figure 14. SEM images of the surface morphology of PU-C (control), PU-121, PU-132, and PU-143 copolymer films at different periods of enzymatic degradation. The figure was used with kind permission from [53].
Figure 14. SEM images of the surface morphology of PU-C (control), PU-121, PU-132, and PU-143 copolymer films at different periods of enzymatic degradation. The figure was used with kind permission from [53].
Jcs 08 00409 g014
Figure 15. PU synthesis schematization according to Liaw [54], where the synthesis of the (a) 3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-AF, (b) 3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-S (TBBPS), and (c) 3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-A chain extender is shown.
Figure 15. PU synthesis schematization according to Liaw [54], where the synthesis of the (a) 3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-AF, (b) 3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-S (TBBPS), and (c) 3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-A chain extender is shown.
Jcs 08 00409 g015
Figure 16. PU synthesis schematization according to Sang et al. [55].
Figure 16. PU synthesis schematization according to Sang et al. [55].
Jcs 08 00409 g016
Figure 17. Platelet adhesion on (a) I-PLAU-121 and (b) I-PLAU-132 films, static contact angle of (c) I-PLAU-121 and (d) I-PLAU-132 films. The figure was used with kind permission from [55].
Figure 17. Platelet adhesion on (a) I-PLAU-121 and (b) I-PLAU-132 films, static contact angle of (c) I-PLAU-121 and (d) I-PLAU-132 films. The figure was used with kind permission from [55].
Jcs 08 00409 g017
Figure 18. PU synthesis schematization according to Shiralizadeh et al. [56].
Figure 18. PU synthesis schematization according to Shiralizadeh et al. [56].
Jcs 08 00409 g018
Figure 19. PU synthesis schematization according to Wang et al. [57].
Figure 19. PU synthesis schematization according to Wang et al. [57].
Jcs 08 00409 g019
Figure 20. Photographs of I-PLAU-121 beads within rabbit muscle after (a) one and (b) four weeks of implantation. The blue arrows indicated the polymer beads. The figure was used with kind permission from [57].
Figure 20. Photographs of I-PLAU-121 beads within rabbit muscle after (a) one and (b) four weeks of implantation. The blue arrows indicated the polymer beads. The figure was used with kind permission from [57].
Jcs 08 00409 g020
Figure 21. PU synthesis schematization according to Egorikhina et al. [58].
Figure 21. PU synthesis schematization according to Egorikhina et al. [58].
Jcs 08 00409 g021
Figure 22. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran et al. [59].
Figure 22. PU synthesis schematization according to Kiran et al. [59].
Jcs 08 00409 g022
Figure 23. PU synthesis schematization according to Sang et al. [60].
Figure 23. PU synthesis schematization according to Sang et al. [60].
Jcs 08 00409 g023
Table 1. Summary of contrast agents incorporated into synthetic polymers for implantable devices. The table was reused under CC-BY 4.0 [23].
Table 1. Summary of contrast agents incorporated into synthetic polymers for implantable devices. The table was reused under CC-BY 4.0 [23].
Contrast AgentBlending MethodPolymerApplicationContentReported EffectsPolymer BiodegradableBiological ResponseRef.
BaSO4Blended in the powder phasePMMABone cement9–15 wt%Hard particles, third body wear, reduced tensile, and flexural strengthNOOsteoclast formation[24]
[25]
[26]
Blended in the powder phasePMMAVertebroplasty cement30 wt%Hard particles, third body wear, lower viscosityNOOsteoclast formation[27]
[28]
[29]
Twin-screw micro-compoundingPLLABioresorbable stents5–20 wt%Increased tensile modulus and strength, decreased elongation at break and ductilityYESNo adverse effects after 21 days[30]
[31]
Magnetic stirring in organic solventPLGABioresorbable stent17.9 v/v%Increased Young’s modulus, reduced elasticity, increased radial strengthYESNa[32]
Solution mixingPLGABone fixation plate1:10 and 1:3 w/w PLGA:BaSO4Radiopaque up to 56 days, BaSO4 leaching < 0.5 mg/day; insufficient to induce cytotoxicityYESNo adverse effects[33]
Lipiodol ultra fluidImmersion in oil at elevated temperatureUHMWPETKA insert25 mLPhysical alteration–swelling, 54% reduction in surface radiopacity after 4 weeksNONa[34]
Iohexol (IHX)StirringPLABioresorbable implants40 wt%Reduced tensile strength, elongation at break and increased tensile modulus, enhanced crystallinity, slower polymer degradationYESThin fiber capsule[35]
Blended in the powder phasePMMABone cement10 wt%Better biocompatibility compared to conventional contrast agentsNOOsteoclast formation[26]
Iodixanol (IDX)Blended in the powder phasePMMABone cement10 wt%Higher osteoclast formation than IHXNOOsteoclast formation[26]
IobitridolDissolved in liquid phaseCPCBone cement56 mg mL−1Rapid release of contrast, no significant change in mechanical properties, no effect on injectability, cohesion, or setting timeYESNo adverse effects[36]
Iodinated diphenolPolymerization reactionPLA diolCoronary stent<1% of 1 mL of iodine contrastIncreased ultimate tensile strength and elongation at break, long-term radiopacityYESNo adverse effects[37]
Bismuth salicylate (BS)Dissolved in liquid phasePMMAVertebroplasty cement10 w/wReduced compressive and tensile strength, reduced strain, lower setting temperature, increased radiopacity, longer injection time, Better compatibility than BaSO4NONa[38]
[39]
Triphenyl bismuth (TPB)Dissolved in liquid phasePMMABone cement10 wt%Increased ultimate tensile strength, Young’s modulus and strain to failure, lower setting temperature, better homogeneityNONa[40]
Bismuth oxide Bi2O3Blended into fiberUHMWPESublaminar cables20 wt%Decreased tensile strength, limited leaching below toxic levelsNONo adverse effects[41]
[42]
Titanium dioxide TiO2BlendingPEOrbital implant6%Slight decrease in tensile strength and modulus, significant decrease in compressive strength and modulus, reduced hardnessNONo adverse effects[43]
Iron oxide Fe3O4Twin-screw extrusionPLLABone screws20 wt%Reduced flexural strength, increased crystallinity, increased thermal stabilityYESOsteogenic effect, no adverse effects[44]
Table 2. Reagents, characterization, and reported effects of some radiopaque polyurethanes reported in the literature.
Table 2. Reagents, characterization, and reported effects of some radiopaque polyurethanes reported in the literature.
ReagentsCharacterizationReported EffectsRef.
2,3-diiodo-2-butene-1,4-diol (I-BOL) (aliphatic chain extender)
4,4′-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI)
Hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI)
Polytetramethylene glycol (PTMG)
2-Butyne-1,4-diol, dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTDL)
FTIR
X-ray opacity
Surface properties under aqueous conditions
In vitro cytotoxicity
Blood compatibility
HDI-based polyurethane was partially crystalline with a phase-separated surface morphology. MDI-based polyurethane has phase-mixed surface morphology, which undergoes dynamic surface reorganization in aqueous medium to a phase-separated surface morphology. Studies on in vitro cytotoxicity and blood compatibility with MDI-based polyurethane revealed cytocompatibility, blood compatibility, and radiopacity[48]
4,4′-isopropylidenebis[2-(2,6-diiodophenoxy)ethanol] (IBPA) (chain extender)
4,4′-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate)(MDI)
Poly(tetramethylene glycol) (PTMG)
FTIR
TGA
DMTA
EDX
GPC
X-radiography
In vitro cytotoxicity
Radiopaque properties
Highly radiopaque polyurethane with an iodine content of 23% (better than aluminum). In vitro non-cytotoxicity using L929 mouse fibroblast cells, visible even after 12 weeks of implantation[49]
N,N′-Bis(3-hydroxypropxyl)-2,3,5,6-tetraiodoterephthalamide (HPTDP) (chain extender)
Poly(tetramethylene glycol) (PTMG)
4,40-Diphenylmethane diisocyanate) (MDI)
NMR
Mechanical properties
In vitro degradation
Cytotoxicity
Radiopaque properties
Good radiopacity (compared to aluminum). Radiopacity did not decrease after oxidative degradation treatment. Has good thermal stability and mechanical properties, non-toxicity[50]
1,6-diisocynatohexane (HDI)
Poly(hexamethylene carbonate)diol (PHCD)
2,2′-(2,5-diiodobenzene-1,4-diyl)bis(oxy)diethanol (DBD)
Barium sulfate (BaSO4)
FTIR
EDX
Mechanical properties
DMTA
X-radiography
Opacity
Fluoroscopy
In vitro cytotoxicity
Melt processable, non-cytotoxic, and blood compatible and possesses a high degree of optical transparency[51]
4,4′-isopropylidinedi-(2,6-diiodophenol) (IBPA) (chain extender)
4,4′-methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI)
polypropylene glycol
polycaprolactone diol
poly(hexamethylene carbonate) diol
FTIR
Contact angle
GPC
Thermal properties
DMTA
EDX
XRF
XRD
Radiopacity
Cytotoxicity
Highly radiopacity compared to aluminum, 18–19% iodine in the polymer matrix, radiopacity equivalent to 20%wt barium sulfate, non-cytotoxicity in L929 cells by direct contact and MTT assay[52]
4,4′-isopropylidinedi-(2,6-diiodophenol) (IBPA) (chain extender)
Poly(e-caprolactone) (PCL)
Isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI)
FTIR
NMR
GPC
EDX
DSC
TGA
WAXD
X-ray opacity
Enzyme-accelerated degradation
cytocompatibility
Highly radiopacity, controllable biodegradability, and cell cytocompatibility tracked during the in vitro enzymatic degradation test, non-toxic biomaterials[53]
Polycaprolactone diol
polytetramethylene glycol
Diphenylmethane 4,4′-diisocyanate (MDI)
Dicyclohexyl methane 4,4′-diisocyanate (HMDI)
Dibutyl tin dilaurate (DBTDL)
Bisphenol-S
Biusphenol-AF
Bisphenol-A
3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-S (TBBPS)
3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-A
3,3′,5,5′-Tetrabromo bisphenol-AF
FTIR
Hardness
Tensile Properties
Specific gravity
Swelling and sol fraction
DMTA
DSC
TGA
XRD
LOI
Water absorption
The addition of bromine atoms in the polyurethanes markedly decreased their degrees of crystallinity. The brominated polyurethane elastomers have good flame retardancy. All of the unbrominated polyurethanes showed
good mechanical properties and high thermal stabilities. Polyurethanes based on bisphenol-S had lower solvent resistance caused by the dipolar nature of sulfonyl groups in the polymer chains
[54]
4,4′-isopropylidinedi-(2,6-diiodophenol) (IBPA)
isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI)
doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX)
triethylene glycol (TEG)
iodinated poly(lactic acid)-polyurethane (I-PLAU)
GPC
Thermal properties
XRD
X-radiography
Contact angle
Blood compatibility
Cell culture
Cytotoxicity assay
In vivo muscle implantation
In vivo drug release
Antitumor assay in vitro
Sufficient radiopacity, in vitro non-toxicity, in vivo biocompatibility, release profile controlled by the microstructure, efficient inhibition of tumor cell growth[55]
4,4′-methylenediphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)
polyethylene glycol (PEG)
4-(4-iodophenyl)-1,2,4-triazolidine-3,5-dione (IUr)
Graphene oxide (GO)
FTIR
NMR
XRD
CHNO
FESEM
TGA
DMTA
Improved thermal and mechanical properties, heat durability, well dispersed GO in the polymeric matrix, significant contrast.[56]
4,4′-isopropylidinedi-(2,6-diiodophenol) (IBPA)
iodinated polycaprolactone-polyurethanes (I-PCLUs)
Doxorubicin (Dox)
Optical microscopy
SEM
UV-vis spectroscopy
In vitro drug release
In vitro antitumor assay
In vivo experiments (muscle implantation, hepatic embolization, chemoembolization of rabbit hepatic tumor model)
Effective drug-loading, sustained release mode for four weeks, kept well X-ray visibility after drug release, inhibition of the tumor cell proliferation, good histocompatibility, effective chemoembolization, and radiopacity.[57]
zirconium oxide
bismuth oxide
tantalum pentoxide
polypropylene glycol (PPG)
4,4′-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)
glycerol
Cytotoxicity
Culture cells
Cytocompatible and interconnected pores, promising for further development as bases for bone-substituting materials.[58]
4,4′-isopropylidinedi(2,6-diiodophenol) (IBPA)
Dibutyltin dilaurate (DBTL)
Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA)
Poly(hexamethylene carbonate)diol (PHCD)
4,4′-methylene-bis(cyclohexyl isocyanate)
NMR
FTIR
TGA
GPC
ESEM
Elemental analysis
Cytocompatibility
In vitro degradation studies
In vivo imaging
Non-toxicity, visible under fluoroscopic conditions, and excellent X-ray opacity.[59]
4,4′-isopropylidinedi(2,6-diiodophenol) (IBPA)
poly(e-caprolactone) diol (PCL)
isophorone diisocyanate (IPDI)
Degradation tests
TGA
X-ray opacity
FESEM
DSC
XRD
Contact angle
Poor hydrophilicity, reduced rate of degradation, and no great attenuation of the X-ray opacity after 3-month degradation.[60]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Garavatti, J.; Ornaghi Jr., H.L. A Short Review on Radiopaque Polyurethanes in Medicine: Physical Principles, Effect of Nanoparticles, Processing, Properties, and Applications. J. Compos. Sci. 2024, 8, 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8100409

AMA Style

Garavatti J, Ornaghi Jr. HL. A Short Review on Radiopaque Polyurethanes in Medicine: Physical Principles, Effect of Nanoparticles, Processing, Properties, and Applications. Journal of Composites Science. 2024; 8(10):409. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8100409

Chicago/Turabian Style

Garavatti, Julia, and Heitor Luiz Ornaghi Jr. 2024. "A Short Review on Radiopaque Polyurethanes in Medicine: Physical Principles, Effect of Nanoparticles, Processing, Properties, and Applications" Journal of Composites Science 8, no. 10: 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs8100409

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop