1. Introduction
Biochar, a carbon-rich material, is produced by the pyrolysis of biomass under limited oxygen [
1]. It is well-documented that biochar acts as a soil amendment through increasing the cation exchange capacity, water retention, microbial activity, nutrient availability, and sequestering toxic heavy metals [
2]. Nevertheless, the role of biochar in ameliorating the physiochemical properties of soils [
3] should be considered as a soil improver in agricultural ecosystems, especially in crop protection.
Soybean fields usually contain a complex of grass and broadleaf weeds such as velvetleaf (
Abutilon theophrasti) from the Malvaceae family that can reduce the final yield of soybean [
4]. For weed control in these agroecosystems, chemical herbicides are commonly used. Trifluralin, a pre-planted incorporated (PPI) herbicide, is recommended against annual grasses such as
A. theophrasti in soybean fields [
5]. This herbicide belongs to dinitroanilines that act as an inhibitor of microtubule synthesis [
6]. Excessive usage of PPI herbicides causes strong adsorption in soil particles with negligible leaching [
7] and then has adverse effects on the soil microbial population, such as a reduction in fauna diversity [
8], soil and environment contamination, and especially groundwater pollution [
9]. Thus, according to the PPI herbicide’s behavior in soils, it seems that changes in the soil’s physicochemical characteristics can solve the abovementioned problems by improving the efficiency of PPI herbicides and reducing their consumption.
The present study aimed to evaluate biochar potential to reduce the need for trifluralin in velvetleaf control through changing the biological conditions in the loam soil of soybean fields.
2. Materials and Methods
The effect of biochar application in soybean fields in order to control velvetleaf was assessed in three blocks and three independent biological replicates in the randomized complete block design. Two blocks were normal soil (NS) with loam soil containing sand (30%), silt (35%), and clay (35%) with pH = 7.55 and EC equal to 1.99 dS·M−1. Another block had a manipulated soil (MS) that contained sand (27%), silt (32%), clay (32%), and biochar (9%) with pH = 7.99 and EC equal to 1.46 dS·M−1. All of the blocks were prepared in 3 m × 3 m terraces.
Two blocks of NS received the recommended dose (NS + RD) (1.7 L/ha) and reduced dose (NS + ReD) (1.2 L/ha) of trifluralin (Trifluralin 48% EC, Ariashimi Company, Iran), respectively. The soil block of MS received only a reduced dose of herbicide (MS + ReD). All herbicide treatments were accomplished in a pre-planted form combined with soil at 5 cm depth when soil humidity was 20%. Two days after herbicide treatments, the authenticated and uniform seeds of A. theophrasti were sown.
The growth of seedlings was monitored for six weeks after sowing for data collection. Then, observed data were changed to numerical percent with inverse trigonometric functions (ArcSin X). The Shapiro–Wilk’s test and Levene’s test were used for normalization and equality of variances, respectively. Finally, the one-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey test (p < 0.05) was subjected to comparison means.
3. Results and Discussion
Results showed that velvetleaf control in NS + RD was 100%, followed by MS + ReD with 93.5% control and no significant difference (F = 9.326,
p = 0.092). Meanwhile, the velvetleaf control was measured to be 81% in NS + ReD, having significant differences with NS + RD (F = 1.753,
p = 0.013) and MS + ReD (F = 2.159,
p = 0.031), respectively. According to the observed results, the biochar addition to the loam soil of soybean fields can reduce herbicide consumption. Previous studies have reported biochar’s ability on soil amendment and its impact on the fate and effects of herbicides in soil [
10]. Due to its higher organic carbon content and specific surface area, biochar acts as the most efficient sorbent for herbicides in the soil [
11]. Thus, it is suggested that the biochar addition to the loam soils of soybean fields can improve the trifluralin efficiency in velvetleaf control by magnifying herbicide persistence that leads to decreasing herbicide application.
It is worth mentioning that the biochar addition to the soil can also enhance the adsorption of herbicides by altering their mobility which leads to decreased herbicide leaching in soil [
12]. Hence, to all appearances, a low dose usage of trifluralin in the loam soil of soybean fields can be related to the biochar role in high adsorption of herbicide molecules to soil particles. Consequently, biochar application leads to promoting trifluralin performance in velvetleaf control. The issue seems to be even more serious when taking groundwater pollution into account. On the other hand, decreasing the soil microbial communities’ exposure to the PPI herbicides can be added to the benefits of biochar addition to the soil [
13].
4. Conclusions
Biochar is a valuable soil amender that can help to reduce PPI herbicides in soil which profoundly contributes to gaining sustainable agriculture and improving environmental health. Finally, biochar application in the long term supports the soil microbial population and reduces soil contamination, environmental pollution, and weed resistance as well.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, J.N.; methodology, M.H.; validation, J.N.; investigation, M.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.H.; writing—review and editing, J.N.; visualization, M.H.; supervision, J.N. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
Not applicable.
Informed Consent Statement
Not applicable.
Data Availability Statement
Data available in a publicly accessible repository.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the Research and Technology Deputy of the University of Tehran.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Ali, S.; Rizwan, M.; Qayyum, M.F.; Ok, Y.S.; Ibrahim, M.; Riaz, M.; Arif, M.S.; Hafeez, F.; Al-Wabel, M.I.; Shahzad, A.N. Biochar soil amendment on alleviation of drought and salt stress in plants: A critical review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 12700–12712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Uchimiya, M.; Lima, I.M.; Klasson, K.T.; Wartelle, L.H. Contaminant immobilization and nutrient release by biochar soil amendment: Roles of natural organic matter. Chemosphere 2010, 80, 935–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Brassard, P.; Godbout, S.; Lévesque, V.; Palacios, J.H.; Raghavan, V.; Ahmed, A.; Hogue, R.; Jeanne, T.; Verma, M. Biochar for soil amendment. In Char and Carbon Materials Derived from Biomass: Production, Characterization and Applications; Jeguirim, M., Limousy, L., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 109–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mitich, L.W. Velvetleaf. Weed Technol. 1991, 5, 253–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reynolds, D.B.; Jordan, D.L.; Vidrine, P.R.; Griffin, J.L. Broadleaf weed control with trifluralin plus flumetsulam in soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 1995, 9, 446–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fernandes, T.C.; Pizano, M.A.; Marin-Morales, M.A. Characterization, modes of action and effects of trifluralin: A review. In Herbicides-Current Research and Case Studies in Use; Price, A.J., Kelton, J.A., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2013; pp. 489–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bhardwaj, L.; Pandey, J.; Dubey, S.K. Effects of herbicides on soil enzymes and their regulatory factors in agroecosystem: A review. In Plant, Soil and Microbes in Tropical Ecosystems; Dubet, S.K., Verma, S.K., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 71–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Singh, M.K.; Singh, N.K.; Singh, S.P. Impact of herbicide use on soil microorganisms. In Plant Responses to Soil Pollution; Singh, P., Singh, S.K., Prasad, S.M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2020; pp. 179–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mendes, K.F.; Régo, A.P.J.; Takeshita, V.; Tornisielo, V.L. Water resource pollution by herbicide residues. In Biochemical Toxicology-Heavy Metals and Nanomaterials; Ince, O.K., Ondrasek, G., Eds.; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2019; pp. 49–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Khorram, M.S.; Zhang, Q.; Lin, D.; Zheng, Y.; Fang, H.; Yu, Y. Biochar: A review of its impact on pesticide behavior in soil environments and its potential applications. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 44, 269–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Spokas, K.A.; Koskinen, W.C.; Baker, J.M.; Reicosky, D.C. Impacts of woodchip biochar additions on greenhouse gas production and sorption/degradation of two herbicides in a Minnesota soil. Chemosphere 2009, 77, 574–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Li, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Z.; Lü, J. Effectiveness of low-temperature biochar in controlling the release and leaching of herbicides in soil. Plant Soil 2013, 370, 333–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Varjani, S.; Kumar, G.; Rene, E.R. Developments in biochar application for pesticide remediation: Current knowledge and future research directions. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 232, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).