Next Article in Journal
Statistical Analysis of a Questionnaire-Based Survey for Assessing the Impact of Tai Ji on the World Health Organization Definitions Regarding Quality of Life (QoL)
Previous Article in Journal
Agro–Industrial Waste Blends on the Mechanical Response of Selected Soils
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Statement of Peer Review †

1
Department of Material Engineering, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Vysokoskolska 4, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia
2
Department of Environmental Engineering, Institute for Sustainable and Circular Construction, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Kosice, Vysokoskolska 4, 04200 Kosice, Slovakia
3
Department of Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mining and Geology, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava, 17. Listopadu 15/2172, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 4th International Conference on Advances in Environmental Engineering, Ostrava, Czech Republic, 20–22 November 2023.
Eng. Proc. 2023, 57(1), 2; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023057002
Published: 17 November 2023
In submitting conference proceedings to Engineering Proceedings, the editors certify that all papers published in this volume have been subjected to peer review by the volume editors. The reviews were conducted by expert referees to the professional and scientific standards expected of a proceedings journal. Reviewers who requested to see the manuscript after revision were re-sent the revised manuscript. All reviewers subsequently agreed to the publication of the revised manuscript.
  • Type of peer review: double-blind.
  • Conference submission management system: web page, e-mail.
  • Number of submissions sent for review: 57.
  • Number of submissions accepted: 42.
  • Acceptance rate (number of submissions accepted/number of submissions received): 73.68.
  • Average number of reviews per paper: 2.
  • Total number of reviewers involved: 65.
  • Any additional information on the review process: The manuscripts were checked for scientific quality by independent reviewers and for technical quality by members of the editorial team.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Estokova, A.; Junakova, N.; Dvorsky, T.; Vaclavik, V.; Balintova, M. Statement of Peer Review. Eng. Proc. 2023, 57, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023057002

AMA Style

Estokova A, Junakova N, Dvorsky T, Vaclavik V, Balintova M. Statement of Peer Review. Engineering Proceedings. 2023; 57(1):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023057002

Chicago/Turabian Style

Estokova, Adriana, Natalia Junakova, Tomas Dvorsky, Vojtech Vaclavik, and Magdalena Balintova. 2023. "Statement of Peer Review" Engineering Proceedings 57, no. 1: 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2023057002

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop