Next Article in Journal
Data-Enabled Predictive Control for Optimal Pressure Management
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Performance Evaluation of Aqueous LiCl and CaCl2 Solutions as Liquid Desiccants in Dehumidification Systems
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

The Key Factors of Watching Live Streaming in Taiwanese Manufacturing Sectors Identified by the Analytic Hierarchy Process †

1
Department of Business Administration, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan
2
Department of Marketing and Logistics Management, Chaoyang University of Technology, Taichung 413310, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Electronic Communications, Internet of Things and Big Data, Taipei, Taiwan, 19–21 April 2024.
Eng. Proc. 2024, 74(1), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024074029
Published: 29 August 2024

Abstract

:
Live streaming has become an emerging business with a firm performance. We investigated the key factors that attract audiences to watch live streaming in the Taiwanese manufacturing industry. Nine experts in manufacturing and social media marketing participated in this study. The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to evaluate the key factors. Three main determinants were determined as a result, including audience motivation, pricing, and branding, each of which was further divided into three sub-factors. Consequently, the results revealed that the most essential factors of these three clusters were social aspects, brand design, and business trend analysis. The results also allow for an understanding of how traditional manufacturers have utilized live streaming to promote products and engage with their audience. These findings serve as a reference for Taiwanese manufacturers to incorporate live streaming into their business promotion strategies.

1. Introduction

People receive information through a variety of means as the Internet ecosystem continues to evolve. As a burgeoning industry, live streaming is experiencing the most rapid growth. Live streaming for online shopping has emerged as a popular marketing approach in various businesses, drawing most of its traffic from influencers producing products by live streaming. Live broadcasters use their platform to promote and encourage buyers to try the products they recommend [1]. Initially, the live broadcast presenter focused on product advertising, which led to customers having a negative experience with the product or being emotionally influenced, causing ambiguity in their decision-making. When making a purchase, consumers weigh between assurance and risk [2]. Recognizing these drawbacks, manufacturers have turned to live streaming to enhance authenticity, build customer trust, reduce uncertainty, improve brand reputation, and boost sales [3]. The growing interest of modern consumers in eco-friendly materials has led upstream manufacturers to educate consumers about the use of green products, giving rise to the concept of the green supply chain [4,5].
When the COVID-19 outbreak surged in late 2019 and early 2020, numerous places had to implement epidemic prevention measures [6]. All industries were affected, causing a significant disruption to the globalized infrastructure supporting the expansion of industrial chains [4]. Subsequent epidemic prevention measures and quarantine, alongside supply chain disruptions and other factors, led to drastic changes on both the demand and supply sides [7].
Audiences are drawn to live streaming due to social trends, information acquisition, and attractive product visual design. This form of communication is a novel approach that organizations employ for effective interactions with customers and consumers. Such direct communication yields valuable audience input essential for the business [8,9,10]. Moreover, analyzing the market, consumer objectives, and business products is pivotal for manufacturers aiming to compete more effectively [5]. Through consumer and live streaming viewer interactions, manufacturers can understand competition. Meanwhile, manufacturers gain by pioneering or initiating trends. Manufacturers effectively delineate their strengths, limitations, opportunities, and challenges, introducing the most competitive products to the market [10,11,12,13]. The source of the product and brand promotion hold immense importance, constituting a pivotal component of the brand’s marketing strategy. Product promotion plays a significant role in enhancing brand recognition among potential consumers and in nurturing customer relationships through promotional activities or live streaming mini-games [11,14,15].
In this study, we identified and evaluated the important factors influencing live streaming deployment in the manufacturing industry. For this, we investigated what factors arise from the existing literature on live streaming uptake in manufacturing and the important factors to consider to establish live streaming in the manufacturing industry. The characteristics of key factors in the live streaming of the manufacturing industry were identified by the literature analysis and expert interviews. Criteria were determined to design surveys. We employed an analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to comprehend numerous factors and provide a precise direction for the manufacturing industry to perform live streaming in the future.

2. Literature Review

Live streaming is one of the most popular e-commerce sales strategies, significantly shaping both consumers’ purchasing behavior and corporate management. It involves the real-time transmission of audio and video content over the Internet [16]. The interactive nature of live streaming allows hosts to engage directly with the audience [17,18]. This form of communication has recently become a fundamental component of e-commerce. With the escalating prevalence of live streaming for shopping, a growing number of manufacturers are establishing channels to directly engage with customers or seek out new agents [16]. Many manufacturers are broadening their reach, integrating live streaming to enhance sales and to bolster consumer understanding of products and brands [19,20].
The impact of live streaming shopping on consumers’ purchase intent is significant. Factors such as authenticity, visual appeal, product pricing, design, and authentic engagement have been demonstrated to significantly influence consumers’ purchasing decisions [21]. The credibility, impact, and professionalism of the host positively shape customers’ buying intent [22]. Hence, live streaming merges the perspectives of hosts and consumers on product quality, enabling manufacturers to refine their optimal strategies [20,23].
In terms of the production industry, live streaming channels exhibit characteristics such as commission rates, fixed fees, and specific fan quotas, alongside unique sales channels or contracts. The potential profitability and advantages of live streaming prompt numerous manufacturers to eagerly initiate their live streaming channels [24]. The competitive intensity concerning pricing, channel market share, and commission rates predominantly shape the sales strategy. Manufacturers establishing direct sales channels yield higher profits for the company [25].
Current research focuses on live streaming by consumer influencers or celebrities. However, we explored aspects of live streaming in the traditional production industry. While previous research was conducted to explore the efficiency of live streaming and the commissions paid by producers to marketing manufacturers, our study delves into the factors that influence live streaming methods in product promotion for production businesses (see Figure 1 and Table 1).

3. Research Method

3.1. AHP

The AHP is a multi-criteria decision-making tool developed by Saaty (1990), widely used in domains such as economics and politics [30]. It is a measurement method that uses pairwise comparisons and relies on expert judgment to provide priorities. The AHP method stipulates that a given problem is hierarchically decomposed and partially solved, and then the partial solutions are combined to obtain the solution to the original problem [30,31]. The subjective decision-making process can be formalized through a hierarchical structure, leading to more accurate decision-making [30]. Thus, ensuring consistent decision-making judgments is vital. Breaking down the problem into sub-problems provides a better understanding [32,33]. Comparisons are made by the team or through an iterative procedure until all team members reach an agreement (presented in Table 2). Before finalizing a decision, a sensitivity analysis is conducted to evaluate the data [30,33].

3.2. Questionnaire Design and Survey

The analytic hierarchy process was conducted to assess each component based on the relative importance of paired factors, comparing and judging them based on different facets. The descriptions below cover the purpose of the questionnaire design; its content, revising status, and survey objects; and the methodology for the questionnaire analysis. Each element at every level is an evaluation standard for pairwise comparisons in the content design. The questionnaire on a scale of 1 to 9, designed for professionals and scholars, was distributed via email for assessment. Invited experts completed the questionnaire, and the data were analyzed for multiple pairwise comparisons. The Expert Choice 2000 software was used to calculate the eigenvalues, eigenvectors, and the essential matrix with each ratio. The respondents for this questionnaire comprised executives from manufacturing and digital marketing manufacturers, showcasing their extensive expertise in manufacturing and their ability to effectively evaluate critical aspects in manufacturing live streaming.

4. Result and Discussion

4.1. Ranking

The weight of the “Manufacturing Live-streaming Evaluation Scale” was calculated based on the overall structural weight. Table 3 shows the weights and rankings of the scale components in this study.
The relative importance of the factors was determined through the previously established hierarchical evaluation framework using the AHP questionnaire. The Expert Choice 2000 was used to calculate the weight and consistency of each level of the questionnaire and obtain the index weights of each evaluation aspect, as shown in Table 4.

4.2. Discussions

To recognize the need, the manufacturing industry must adapt its business practices for the next generation. Apart from improving performance, industry leaders must prioritize the integration of new technologies to set the pace as a model for future manufacturers. The most essential critical criteria for manufacturing live streaming were “Viewers’ motivation to watch live streaming,” “product market pricing,” and “brand promotion resources.” The most essential characteristics of “Viewers’ motivation to watch live streaming” were “social aspects”, “brand promotion resources”, “brand design”, product market pricing”, and “business trend analysis” (presented in Table 5). The convenience that consumers obtain from retailers’ live marketing efforts benefits merchants in a variety of ways (Figure 2). The ability to live stream shopping activities on e-commerce platforms is widely valued [8,9,10]. Product strategies and business trends used by corporations to deliver benefits and economic benefits to manufacturers are significant, and manufacturers must develop their plans precisely [14,15].
COVID-19 has significantly disrupted the operations of numerous industries, leading to the cancellation or postponement of large-scale marketing initiatives and exhibitions. Global supply networks and essential industries have been significantly affected, posing new operational challenges for many small- and medium-sized businesses [7]. This crisis has changed people’s purchasing habits from physical to online shopping. To address the challenges posed by the pandemic, many companies have embraced live streaming as an emergent business activity [4,34]. Traditional manufacturing industries have transitioned into providers of manufacturing services. Leveraging live streaming platforms, these industries are exploring new business formats and models to facilitate transformation and upgrading [21]. By investigating the factors of manufacturing live streaming, the result of this study provides a reference for the future development of the manufacturing industry in the direction of live streaming.

5. Conclusions

Online live streaming has emerged as a new and pivotal business activity. In this study, the most effective approach for the manufacturing industry was identified to offer a framework for manufacturing live streaming. The results assist enterprises in mitigating operational blind spots and maximizing commercial rewards. We prioritized the variables of utmost importance, such as “selecting target markets”, “marketing and channel experience planning,” “business trend analysis”, “information acquisition”, “local integration”, “visual design”, “technical analysis”, “brand design”, and “social aspects”. The global epidemic has significantly impacted industries and hindered economic development and the mid- and long-term business goals of manufacturers. Smart manufacturing mitigates losses during this struggle. Manufacturers face significant challenges when the global economy becomes unstable. By adapting and investigating the factors in this study, future research and exploration can be directed. Future research is necessary to include big data, artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and Taiwan’s industrial transformation. Then, updated theoretical foundations and practical guidelines can be acquired. The factors of new business activities for traditional manufacturing industries are used for reference. Based on the research findings, the following practical applications are proposed for traditional manufacturing manufacturers.
The professionalization of enterprise’s live streaming and the enhancement of the ecosystem are demanded. Live streaming needs to be refined for professional operations, accompanied by a comprehensive industrial chain. To prevent content homogeneity, platforms must differentiate themselves using product and format innovations. Strengthening the anchor ecosystem’s construction bolsters platform advantages to gain a competitive edge and win users in a fiercely competitive environment. Various live streaming application scenarios are evolving as the live broadcast market is increasingly segmented and vertically developed, spanning multiple industries such as finance, education, training, and medical care. These scenarios for larger companies are categorized into internal and external services. Internally, companies can utilize live streaming for corporate training, expert lectures, and internal meetings, prioritizing privacy and interaction in the live streaming environment. Externally, the company needs to leverage live streaming technology for marketing in seminars, meetings, events, and exhibitions. In addition to using reliable technical services, a significant focus needs to be put on content promotion and traffic direction to aid businesses in retaining existing clients and attracting new customers. For small- and medium-sized organizations, live video services are emphasized in marketing activities, leveraging public and private traffic sources to promote their activities, empower enterprise development, and achieve traffic conversion.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.-T.H. and Y.-F.H.; methodology, T.-T.H. and M.-H.D.; validation, Y.-F.H. and T.-T.H.; formal analysis, T.-T.H.; investigation, T.-T.H.; resources, T.-T.H.; data curation, T.-T.H.; writing—original draft preparation, M.-H.D. and T.-T.H.; writing—review and editing, T.-T.H. and M.-H.D.; visualization, T.-T.H.; supervision, Y.-F.H.; and project administration, Y.-F.H. and M.-H.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the chief editor and the reviewers for their valuable comments to improve the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

All authors declare no conflicts of interest in this paper.

References

  1. Zhang, S.; Huang, C.; Li, X.; Ren, A. Characteristics and Roles of Streamers in E-Commerce Live Streaming. Serv. Ind. J. 2022, 42, 1001–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hu, M.; Chaudhry, S.S. Enhancing Consumer Engagement in E-Commerce Live Streaming via Relational Bonds. Internet Res. 2020, 30, 1019–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ming, J.; Jianqiu, Z.; Bilal, M.; Akram, U.; Fan, M. How Social Presence Influences Impulse Buying Behavior in Live Streaming Commerce? The Role of S-O-R Theory. Int. J. Web Inf. Syst. 2021, 17, 300–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huang, Y.; Phan, V.; Do, M. The Impacts of Supply Chain Capabilities, Visibility, Resilience on Supply Chain Performance and Firm Performance. Adm. Sci. 2023, 13, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Van Phan, V.D.; Huang, Y.F.; Do, M.H. Exploring the Effect of Cognitive Factors and E-Social Interactions on the Green Purchase Intention: Evidence from a Transitional Economy. Young Consum. 2023, 24, 767–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Phan, V.-D.-V.; Huang, Y.-F.; Hoang, T.-T.; Do, M.-H. Evaluating Barriers to Supply Chain Resilience in Vietnamese SMEs: The Fuzzy VIKOR Approach. Systems 2023, 11, 121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Do, M.-H.; Huang, Y.-F.; Phan, V.-D.-V. Analyzing the Barriers to Green Supply Chain Management Implementation: A Case Study of the Vietnamese Agriculture Sector. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 2023, 37, 125–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Vanclay, F. International Principles for Social Impact Assessment. Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais. 2003, 21, 5–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lv, J.; Yao, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yu, J. A Game Model for Information Dissemination in Live Streaming E-Commerce Environment. Int. J. Commun. Syst. 2022, 35, e5010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chung, J.J.Y.; Shin, H.V.; Xia, H.; Wei, L.Y. Beyond Show of Hands: Engaging Viewers via Expressive and Scalable Visual Communication in Live Streaming. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Yokohama, Japan, 8–13 May 2021; pp. 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wongkitrungrueng, A.; Dehouche, N.; Assarut, N. Live Streaming Commerce from the Sellers’ Perspective: Implications for Online Relationship Marketing. J. Mark. Manag. 2020, 36, 488–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rehan, M.M.; Morsi, R.A.; ElNaggar, A. Technical Analysis on Future Challenges and Opportunities in Live P2P Streaming. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Engineering and Technology (ICET), Cairo, Egypt, 19–20 April 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Schonenberg, H.; Jian, J.; Sidorova, N.; Van Der Aalst, W. Business Trend Analysis by Simulation. In Advanced Information Systems Engineering; Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics); Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 6051, pp. 515–529. [Google Scholar]
  14. Selimi, M.; Apólonia, N.; Olid, F.; Freitag, F.; Navarro, L.; Moll, A.; Pueyo, R.; Veiga, L. Integration of an Assisted P2P Live Streaming Service in Community Network Clouds. In Proceedings of the IEEE 7th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, CloudCom, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 30 November–3 December 2015; Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2015; pp. 202–209. [Google Scholar]
  15. Montaña, J.; Guzmán, F.; Moll, I. Branding and Design Management: A Brand Design Management Model. J. Mark. Manag. 2007, 23, 829–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Chou, S.W.; Hsieh, M.C.; Pan, H.C. Understanding Viewers’ Information-Sharing in Live-Streaming Based on a Motivation Perspective. Online Inf. Rev. 2023, 47, 177–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sripanidkulchai, K.; Maggs, B.; Zhang, H. An Analysis of Live Streaming Workloads on the Internet. In Proceedings of the 4th ACM SIGCOMM Conference on Internet Measurement, Taormina, Italy, 25–27 October 2004; pp. 41–54. [Google Scholar]
  18. Smith, T.P.B.; Obrist, M.; Wright, P. Live-Streaming Changes the (Video) Game. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Interactive TV and Video, EuroITV 2013, Como, Italy, 24–26 June 2013; pp. 131–138. [Google Scholar]
  19. Netland, T.; Stegmaier, M.; Primultini, C.; Maghazei, O. Interactive Mixed Reality Live Streaming Technology in Manufacturing. Manuf. Lett. 2023, 38, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Du, Z.; Fan, Z.P.; Sun, F. Live Streaming Sales: Streamer Type Choice and Limited Sales Strategy for a Manufacturer. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2023, 61, 101300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ho, C.I.; Liu, Y.; Chen, M.C. Factors Influencing Watching and Purchase Intentions on Live Streaming Platforms: From a 7Ps Marketing Mix Perspective. Information 2022, 13, 239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hou, J.; Shen, H.; Xu, F. A Model of Livestream Selling with Online Influencers. SSRN Electron. J. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, S.; Guo, X. Strategic Introduction of Live-Stream Selling in a Supply Chain. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 2023, 62, 101315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhang, T.; Tang, Z. Should Manufacturers Open Live Streaming Shopping Channels? J. Retail. Consum. Serv. 2023, 71, 103229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lin, G.; Xiong, X.; Li, Y.; Zhu, X. Sales Mode Selection Strategic Analysis for Manufacturers on E-Commerce Platforms under Multi-Channel Competition. Systems 2022, 10, 234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Vargas, L.G. An Overview of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Its Applications. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1990, 48, 2–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hamilton, W.A.; Garretson, O.; Kerne, A. Streaming on Twitch: Fostering Participatory Communities of Play within Live Mixed Media. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, ON, Canada, 26 April–1 May 2014; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2014; pp. 1315–1324. [Google Scholar]
  28. Hilvert-Bruce, Z.; Neill, J.T.; Sjöblom, M.; Hamari, J. Social Motivations of Live-Streaming Viewer Engagement on Twitch. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2018, 84, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sjöblom, M.; Törhönen, M.; Hamari, J.; Macey, J. The Ingredients of Twitch Streaming: Affordances of Game Streams. Comput. Hum. Behav. 2019, 92, 20–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Saaty, T.L. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1990, 48, 9–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Baffoe, G. Exploring the Utility of Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) in Ranking Livelihood Activities for Effective and Sustainable Rural Development Interventions in Developing Countries. Eval. Program Plann. 2019, 72, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Lahane, S.; Kant, R. Evaluating the Circular Supply Chain Implementation Barriers Using Pythagorean Fuzzy AHP-DEMATEL Approach. Clean. Logist. Supply Chain 2021, 2, 100014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mani, V.; Agrawal, R.; Sharma, V. Supplier Selection Using Social Sustainability: AHP Based Approach in India. Int. Strateg. Manag. Rev. 2014, 2, 98–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. He, Y.; Chen, L.; Mu, J.; Ullah, A. Optimal Contract Design for Live Streaming Shopping in a Manufacturer–Retailer–Streamer Supply Chain. Electron. Commer. Res. 2024, 24, 1071–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proposed research model.
Figure 1. Proposed research model.
Engproc 74 00029 g001
Figure 2. Overall weight ranking of all sub-factors.
Figure 2. Overall weight ranking of all sub-factors.
Engproc 74 00029 g002
Table 1. Identification of critical factors and sub-factors.
Table 1. Identification of critical factors and sub-factors.
No.CodeBarriersDescriptionReference
Viewers’ motivation to watch live streaming (VM)
1VM1Social aspectsSatisfy and gain social support through live streaming platforms [8]
2VM2Obtaining informationGet new knowledge through live streaming platforms [9]
3VM3Visual designViewers and live streaming manufacturers can interact, exchange information, and conduct online teaching [10]
Product market pricing (PP)
1PP1Business trend analysisEnterprises have a grasp of the latest business innovation directions and context. What these refer to are trends like benchmark cases and overall industry trends [13,23]
2PP2Technical analysisCollect the cross-field technologies required by enterprises when conducting design innovation to understand the implementation methods and feasibility of innovation [12,26]
3PP3Selecting target marketsStrengthen the interactivity of the market, and sociality contributes to the concept of one-to-one marketing [11]
Brand promotion resource (BR)
1BR1Brand designBrand design in a broad sense includes strategic design, product design, and image design. Corporate image design is an aspect of brand design, and its connotation is relatively broad[15,27]
2BR2Local integrationIntegrate locally related resources, materials, workforce, expertise, etc. to assist in product manufacturing, sales, promotion, etc.[14]
3BR3Marketing and channel experience planningMainly through understanding the positioning of current competitors and overall channel analysis, we develop channel-specific brand strategies, so that the marketing strategy can be fully realized in stores. Channel strategy includes distribution, price, and promotion [28,29]
Table 2. Saaty’s basic scale.
Table 2. Saaty’s basic scale.
Intensity of ImportanceDefinition
1Equal importance
3Moderate importance
5Strong importance
7Very strong importance
9Extreme importance
Table 3. Ranking of factors.
Table 3. Ranking of factors.
FactorWeightRelative Ranking
Viewers’ motivation to watch live streaming (VM)0.6491
Product market pricing (PP)0.2472
Brand promotion resource (BR)0.1043
Table 4. Weights and evaluation index of factors.
Table 4. Weights and evaluation index of factors.
CodeC.RDecision
VM0.030Accept
VM10.001Accept
VM20.003Accept
VM30.004Accept
PP0.009Accept
PP10.005Accept
PP20.006Accept
PP30.007Accept
BR0.010Accept
BR10.009Accept
BR20.008Accept
BR30.001Accept
Table 5. Factor weighting and ranking.
Table 5. Factor weighting and ranking.
Sub-FactorWeightOverall WeightRanking
VM10.6630.4281
VM20.2380.1543
VM30.0990.0646
PP10.6520.1632
PP20.2710.0684
PP30.0770.0198
BR10.6470.0684
BR20.2710.0297
BR30.0810.0099
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoang, T.-T.; Huang, Y.-F.; Do, M.-H. The Key Factors of Watching Live Streaming in Taiwanese Manufacturing Sectors Identified by the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Eng. Proc. 2024, 74, 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024074029

AMA Style

Hoang T-T, Huang Y-F, Do M-H. The Key Factors of Watching Live Streaming in Taiwanese Manufacturing Sectors Identified by the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Engineering Proceedings. 2024; 74(1):29. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024074029

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hoang, Thi-Them, Yung-Fu Huang, and Manh-Hoang Do. 2024. "The Key Factors of Watching Live Streaming in Taiwanese Manufacturing Sectors Identified by the Analytic Hierarchy Process" Engineering Proceedings 74, no. 1: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2024074029

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop