Design Factors of Water Mist in the Mystery of Landscapes †
Abstract
:1. Introduction
- Visual sense: This includes elements such as color, shape, typography, and graphics. Visual design plays a crucial role in capturing users’ attention and conveying information. Bright colors and good typography can make information easier to understand and remember.
- Auditory sense: This involves sound effects, music, and voice. Auditory design influences emotions and enhances brand impressions. For example, background music can help customers feel relaxed in a store, thereby extending their stay.
- Tactile sense: This refers to sensations related to product materials, shapes, and surface textures. Tactile design is essential in product development, as a positive tactile experience can increase the product’s appeal and comfort of use.
- Olfactory sense: Smell significantly affects a person’s emotions and behavior. Properly incorporating scents in design enhances customer experience, such as releasing the aroma of fresh coffee in a café.
- Gustatory sense: This is mainly applied in the design of food and beverages, involving the combination of taste, texture, and appearance. Exceptional gustatory design can provide customers with a more enjoyable tasting experience.
- Natural elements: Natural landscapes such as plants, terrain, water bodies, and animals influence emotions and psychological states. For example, green vegetation may evoke a sense of calm, while expansive water surfaces are often associated with relaxation and pleasure.
- Design features: These include the shape, materials, color, and texture of buildings, all of which directly affect the atmosphere. For instance, a space built with warm colors and natural materials creates a cozy and comfortable ambiance.
- Light: The quality and direction of light affect the perception of space; for example, soft lighting creates a relaxing feeling, while intense direct light triggers feelings of tension.
- Sound: The sounds within the environment (such as flowing water, birds chirping, or city noise) also influence the atmosphere. A quiet environment often brings tranquility, while lively music can inspire and energize.
- Human activity: Interactions and behaviors of people significantly impact the formation of the atmosphere. For example, interactions in a bustling public space create a vibrant and social atmosphere, whereas contemplative actions in a serene park foster a sense of peace.
- Sensory stimulation: The design of visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, and gustatory elements in the environment evokes emotional responses from users and enhances their perception of the space. For example, soft lighting combined with appropriate background music creates a more relaxing atmosphere.
- Spatial layout: Logical spatial planning and layout improve flow and interactivity, making users feel more comfortable and the space more convenient. Open designs promote social interaction, while private spaces provide a quiet environment for reflection and rest.
- Interactive elements: Introducing interactive facilities and technologies (such as information displays, interactive art installations, etc.) stimulates users’ curiosity and enhances their sense of participation. Such interactions enable people to explore the environment more deeply.
- Emotional connection: In an environmental design, users’ emotional needs are considered to establish emotional connections through color combinations, material selections, and artistic presentations. These foster a sense of familiarity and belonging within the environment.
- Culture and context: Designers take the local cultural background and social context into account to allow users to experience familiarity and resonance. This creates connections between the space and users’ life experiences, enhancing their sense of identification with the environment.
- Physical and mental well-being: Environmental design promotes physical and mental health. For example, incorporating green plants, natural light, and high-quality air contributes to overall well-being and reduces stress levels.
2. Methods
3. Result
3.1. Respondents
3.2. Perception of Landscape Mystery
Attractive Environment with Landscape Mystery
3.3. Perspections of Water Mist Landscape Design
4. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bimbao, J.A.; Ou, S.-J. Exploring the Landscape Preference of Transport Corridors from the Perspective of Cycling. J. Des. Environ. 2022, 23, 35–52. [Google Scholar]
- Kaplan, S. Perception and landscape: Conception and misconceptions. In Proceedings of Our National Landscape Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of the Visual Resource; Elsner, G.H., Smardon, R.C., Eds.; Pacific SW Forest & Range Experiment Station: Incline Village, NV, USA, 1979; pp. 23–25. [Google Scholar]
- Kplan, R.; Kaplan, S.; Brown, T. Environment Preference. Environ. Behav. 1989, 21, 509–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Akhir, N.M.; Sakip, S.R.M.; Abbas, M.Y.; Othman, N. Modelling landscape aesthetic of planting composition influencing visual quality and well-being: PLS-SEM approach. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 385, 012021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chi, F.L.; Ou, S.-J.; Lin, C.-Y. Exploring the Characteristics of Environmental Mystery from the Perspective of University Students. Hortic. NCHU 2008, 33, 117–130. [Google Scholar]
- Gao, Y.; Ge, L.; Zhong, T.; Meng, X. Effect of water mist stimulation on dynamic thermal response of pedestrians in summer. Build. Environ. 2023, 246, 110988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ulpiani, G. Water mist spray for outdoor cooling: A systematic review of technologies, methods and impacts. Appl. Energy 2019, 254, 113647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Globa, A.; Beza, B.B.; Wang, R. Towards multi-sensory design: Placemaking through immersive environments—Evaluation of the approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 2022, 204, 117614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jin, W.W.; Miao, W.Y. How the ecological structure affects the aesthetic atmosphere of the landscape Evaluation of the landscape Beauty of Xingqing Palace Park in Xi’an. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0302855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Moyle, B.D.; Scherrer, P.; Weiler, B.; Wilson, E.; Caldicott, R.; Nielsen, N. Assessing preferences of potential visitors for nature-based experiences in protected areas. Tour. Manag. 2017, 62, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Level of Interpretation (Preference Matrix) | Making Sense (Comprehension) | Involvement (Exploration) |
---|---|---|
The Visual Array (Immediate Landscape) | Coherence | Complexity |
The Three-Dimensional Space (Inferred Landscape) | Legibility | Mystery |
Questionnaire Items | Mean | Standard Deviation |
---|---|---|
I believe that areas “with” mist have a sense of mystery. | 4.17 | 0.68 |
I believe that areas “without” mist have a sense of mystery. | 2.58 | 0.80 |
I like landscapes with mist. | 4.15 | 0.65 |
I like landscapes without mist. | 3.04 | 0.83 |
I believe mist can enhance the mystery of the landscape. | 4.33 | 0.68 |
I believe that the diversity of environmental planting can increase the mystery of the landscape. | 4.18 | 0.78 |
I believe that the hazy effect of mist under sunset can enhance the mystery of the landscape. | 4.3 | 0.77 |
I believe that the sound of small pebbles rustling can increase the sense of mystery in the landscape. | 3.63 | 0.91 |
I believe that the rustling sound of bamboo swaying in the wind can enhance the mystery of the landscape. | 3.97 | 0.89 |
I believe that environments with landscape mystery are attractive. | 4.19 | 0.76 |
I believe that mystery is important in playground landscape design. | 3.71 | 1 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | Significance | Collinearity Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
(constant) | 0.768 | 0.273 | 2.815 | 0.005 | |||
I believe that the rustling sound produced by the swaying of bamboo in the wind can enhance the mystery of the landscape | 0.268 | 0.051 | 0.314 | 5.297 | 0 | 0.708 | 1.413 |
I believe that mist can enhance the mystery of the landscape | 0.248 | 0.076 | 0.221 | 3.26 | 0.001 | 0.542 | 1.846 |
I believe that the hazy effect of the mist under the sunset can enhance the mystery of the landscape | 0.187 | 0.07 | 0.189 | 2.662 | 0.008 | 0.497 | 2.013 |
I believe that the diversity of environmental planting can enhance the mystery of the landscape | 0.115 | 0.058 | 0.118 | 1.978 | 0.049 | 0.705 | 1.418 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | Significance | Collinearity Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
(constant) | 0.273 | 0.213 | 1.279 | 0.202 | |||
I believe that the ‘visual obscuration effect’ of mist | 0.323 | 0.062 | 0.326 | 5.198 | 0 | 0.428 | 2.336 |
I believe that the ‘atmosphere creation’ of mist | 0.293 | 0.069 | 0.271 | 4.241 | 0 | 0.41 | 2.439 |
I believe that the ‘enhancement of air humidity and comfort’ by mist | 0.186 | 0.038 | 0.231 | 4.907 | 0 | 0.759 | 1.318 |
Incorporating undulating terrain and pathways | 0.143 | 0.05 | 0.149 | 2.854 | 0.005 | 0.618 | 1.618 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | Significance | Collinearity Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
(constant) | 0.712 | 0.315 | 2.258 | 0.025 | |||
Combining mist with plant landscapes | 0.282 | 0.078 | 0.26 | 3.616 | 0 | 0.537 | 1.861 |
Incorporating undulating terrain and pathways | 0.195 | 0.076 | 0.184 | 2.577 | 0.011 | 0.546 | 1.832 |
I believe that the ‘atmosphere creation’ of mist | 0.238 | 0.086 | 0.2 | 2.777 | 0.006 | 0.537 | 1.862 |
Mist at different heights and densities | 0.223 | 0.089 | 0.191 | 2.496 | 0.013 | 0.478 | 2.093 |
I believe that the ‘sound effects (hissing sound)’ of mist | −0.13 | 0.053 | −0.151 | −2.44 | 0.016 | 0.722 | 1.384 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | Significance | Collinearity Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
(constant) | 0.585 | 0.324 | 1.803 | 0.073 | |||
I believe that the ‘enhancement of air humidity and comfort’ by mist | 0.347 | 0.058 | 0.368 | 5.944 | 0 | 0.759 | 1.318 |
Mist at different heights and densities | 0.231 | 0.081 | 0.186 | 2.867 | 0.005 | 0.689 | 1.451 |
I believe that the ‘visual obscuration effect’ of mist | 0.2 | 0.079 | 0.173 | 2.546 | 0.012 | 0.631 | 1.584 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | Significance | Collinearity Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
(constant) | 1.079 | 0.298 | 3.626 | 0 | |||
Mist at different heights and densities | 0.267 | 0.084 | 0.235 | 3.17 | 0.002 | 0.541 | 1.849 |
I believe that the mist’s ‘ability to increase fantasy and imaginative space’ | 0.278 | 0.066 | 0.28 | 4.247 | 0 | 0.684 | 1.461 |
Combining mist with plant landscapes | 0.187 | 0.075 | 0.178 | 2.493 | 0.013 | 0.584 | 1.713 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | Significance | Collinearity Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
(constant) | 1.228 | 0.356 | 3.448 | 0.001 | |||
Combining mist with plant landscapes | 0.286 | 0.085 | 0.232 | 3.349 | 0.001 | 0.725 | 1.379 |
I believe that the mist’s ‘ability to increase fantasy and imaginative space’ | 0.214 | 0.088 | 0.184 | 2.425 | 0.016 | 0.606 | 1.651 |
I believe that the mist’s ‘enhancement of air humidity and comfort’ | 0.162 | 0.076 | 0.161 | 2.142 | 0.033 | 0.617 | 1.62 |
Model | Unstandardized Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | Significance | Collinearity Statistics | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | Standard Error | β | Tolerance | VIF | |||
(constant) | 1.408 | 0.276 | 5.103 | 0 | |||
I believe that the mist’s ‘visual obscuration effect’ | 0.363 | 0.077 | 0.354 | 4.679 | 0 | 0.518 | 1.932 |
I believe that the mist’s ‘ability to increase fantasy and imaginative space’ | 0.178 | 0.072 | 0.185 | 2.458 | 0.015 | 0.522 | 1.916 |
Incorporating undulating terrain and pathways | 0.132 | 0.065 | 0.133 | 2.021 | 0.044 | 0.682 | 1.466 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Lee, W.-P.-C.; Ou, S.-J. Design Factors of Water Mist in the Mystery of Landscapes. Eng. Proc. 2025, 91, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091014
Lee W-P-C, Ou S-J. Design Factors of Water Mist in the Mystery of Landscapes. Engineering Proceedings. 2025; 91(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091014
Chicago/Turabian StyleLee, Wu-Po-Cheng, and Sheng-Jung Ou. 2025. "Design Factors of Water Mist in the Mystery of Landscapes" Engineering Proceedings 91, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091014
APA StyleLee, W.-P.-C., & Ou, S.-J. (2025). Design Factors of Water Mist in the Mystery of Landscapes. Engineering Proceedings, 91(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/engproc2025091014