Next Article in Journal
Profiling the Variability of Eucalyptus Essential Oils with Activity against the Phylum Nematoda
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of Nanotechnology on the Future of Pharmaceuticals and Nutraceuticals: The Road toward Precision Medicines—Case Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Essential Oils as Potential Biopesticides in the Control of the Genus Meloidogyne: A Review †

by
Jorge M. S. Faria
1,2,* and
Ana Margarida Rodrigues
3
1
INIAV, I.P., National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinarian Research, Quinta do Marquês, 2780-159 Oeiras, Portugal
2
MED, Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, Institute for Advanced Studies and Research, Évora University, Pólo da Mitra, Ap. 94, 7006-554 Evora, Portugal
3
Plant Metabolomics Laboratory, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier (ITQB NOVA), Av. da República, 2780-157 Oeiras, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy, 3–17 May 2021; Available online: https://iecag2021.sciforum.net/.
Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09687
Published: 1 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Agronomy)

Abstract

:
Meloidogyne spp., commonly known as root-knot nematodes (RKN), are among the most economically damaging plant-parasitic nematodes to horticultural and field crops, mainly due to their pathogenic effect, worldwide distribution, and wide host range. RKN pest management relies on the use of commercial synthetic pesticides, such as broad-spectrum fumigants and nervous system toxins, which kill or disrupt the feeding or reproductive behavior of nematodes. These active chemicals can cause negative environmental and public health impacts and are feared to lead to resistance and immunity. As a sustainable alternative, the use of essential oils (EOs) as nematicides has shown great promise. These natural products are mostly biodegradable and subjected to less strict regulatory approval mechanisms for their exploration. The present work reviews the existing bibliography on the direct biological activity of EOs against RKNs. A total of 49 publications from 1995 to 2020 were identified to have reported on the anti-RKN activity of EOs. Plants from the Lamiaceae and Compositae families make up more than 50% of the source material for EO extraction. The highest activities were reported for EOs of the Monarda, Artemisia, Filipendula, and Satureja genus. These taxa show potential that can be further explored for highly active anti-RKN phytochemicals with practical applications in sustainable pest management strategies.

1. Introduction

In intensive agriculture, plant-parasitic nematodes (PPNs) are a major problem for reducing plant growth and productivity. Depending on the environmental and edaphic conditions, losses in agricultural fields can be extreme as a result of direct PPN influence and/or indirectly by enabling infections from other opportunistic microbial pathogens. PPNs negatively impact worldwide crop yield, causing ca. 12% losses, which is more than twice those caused by insect pests [1]. The genus Meloidogyne (Order: Tylenchida, Family: Heteroderidae), or root-knot nematodes (RKN), comprises some of the most economically important species and is responsible for extensive economical losses by reducing crop yield and product quality. These obligate endoparasites disrupt the plant host physiology by bypassing plant defenses and modifying root morphology. Inside the root, they establish specialized root structures (i.e., root galls), used by the RKN for feeding and reproduction [2]. These sites become energy sinks for photosynthates, causing the host plant to display nutritional stress symptoms.
RKN movement in the soil is slow, restricted only to a few meters per year, and its dispersal commonly relies on the human transportation of infested plants, plant products, through soil adhering to farm implements, and on irrigation water [3]. Eggs are produced in masses surrounded by a gelatinous matrix that provides a barrier against water loss, adverse environmental conditions, and even biotic stress [4]. In the presence of adequate environmental conditions and chemical cues from the host, juveniles hatch and seek the roots of susceptible plants. Infection occurs at the elongation zone, where RKNs use the stylet to penetrate root tissues. Evading the plant immune response, they move intercellularly towards the root tip and then upward into the vascular cylinder to the differentiation zone, where the nematode feeding site is established [5]. By secreting a protein “cocktail” mainly composed of cell wall biosynthetic and degrading enzymes, and even by mobilizing plant produced enzymes, RKNs induce the formation of a feeding site composed of five to seven redifferentiated cells distinguished from the neighboring cells by their increased volume, dense cytoplasm, numerous nuclei, and small vacuoles [6]. These highly metabolically active giant cells develop cell wall ingrowths for rapid solute transport from the contiguous xylem elements, supplying nematodes with nutrients. Juveniles then undergo significant structural changes, molting into an adult sedentary stage. Pear-shaped adult females, with swollen bodies, begin producing the gelatinous matrix through six rectal glands before and during egg laying [7]. The complexity of the RKN life cycle and the wide range of host plants they can parasitize turns pest management into a difficult task.

2. RKN Pest Management

With the onset of industrialization in modern agriculture and the mass monoculture of crops, the damaging effects of RKN diseases have increased dramatically, requiring more effective means of control. Pest management is usually performed through non-chemical strategies, namely natural host resistance and cultural controls, and through chemical strategies with the use of nematicides [8,9]. Chemical control employs the use of synthetic pesticides that kill or disrupt the feeding or reproductive behavior of nematodes; such pesticides are commonly broad-spectrum fumigants and nervous system toxins. Although highly efficient, these pesticides can have negative environmental and public health impacts, which have led to several instances of banning of hazardous pesticides [10]. Modern chemical control has become limited by the availability of active compounds and the emergence of resistance and immunity. This has prompted the search for cost-effective, environment friendly alternatives with high activity against the RKN. Phytochemical-based strategies for RKN control have been successfully employed, and several essential oils (EOs) have shown remarkable nematicidal activities, in some cases even surpassing those of commercial nematicides. EOs offer the advantage of being natural, biodegradable, and subjected to less strict regulatory approval mechanisms for their exploration due to a long history of use [11]. Chemically, EOs are comprised of terpenes (mainly mono- and sesquiterpenes, and a few diterpenes) and phenolic compounds, such as phenylpropanoids, but other groups of compounds can also occur in relevant amounts. The biological activity of EOs is commonly the result of the combined effect of biologically active compounds and compounds that show no direct activity individually but can influence resorption, the rate of reactions, and the bioavailability of the active compounds. Furthermore, EO compounds can have additive, synergistic, or antagonistic interactions towards anti-RKN activity. Their toxicity is thought to be caused by damage to the functioning of nematode internal organs. EOs can display diverse biological activities, which makes them desirable biopesticides as they are able to regulate not just the targeted pest but also the opportunistic species and resistant strains [10,12,13].
Crossing the available information on EOs with activity against RKNs may provide important guidelines for future research on environment-friendlier nematicidal compounds. In this respect, the present work reviews the existing bibliography on the direct biological activity of EOs against Meloidogyne, known to cause 5% of global crop losses, and summarizes the most important plant taxa.

3. Essential Oils as RKN Biopesticides

Research was performed with the Web of Science® search engine, in all available databases, on published works reporting direct contact bioassays, using the topics “Meloidogyne” and “essential oil”. Information on the family and species of the plant source used for EO extraction and the respective EO half maximal effective concentration (EC50) was collected when available.
A total of 49 works were retrieved reporting on the activity of EOs against the RKNs M. artiellia, M. chitwoodi, M. graminicola, M. incognita, and M. javanica in direct contact bioassays. Plant sciences, entomology, food science technology, agronomy, biochemistry, and molecular biology were the top five scientific areas of the journals that published these reports. Publications dated from 1995 to 2020, with 2020 being the year with the most publications (eight) (Figure 1a). The listed publications were cited 1015 times, with an average of 21 citations per work (Figure 1b). Research interest increased steadily from 2012 (Figure 1b).
EOs from 179 plant species, from a total of 29 families, were analyzed in over 900 direct contact bioassays. The most analyzed EOs belonged to plants of the Lamiaceae, Compositae, Poaceae, and Myrtaceae families, from which over 70% of tested EOs were extracted (Figure 2a). The remaining 29% included families of plants known to be the source of important phytochemicals such as the Rutaceae (6%), Apiaceae (4%), and Verbenaceae (4%).
The EC50 values of the 10 most active EOs ranged from 0.001 to 0.030 mg/mL (Figure 2b). These EOs were extracted from plants of the genus Monarda (M. didyma and M. fistulosa), Artemisia (A. nilagirica), Filipendula (F. ulmaria), and Satureja (S. montana) [14,15,16]. These EOs showed chemical compositions mainly rich in monoterpenoids and phenylpropanoids, namely camphor, carvacrol, linalyl isovalerate, methyl salicylate, o-cymene, α-myrcene, α-thujone, β-caryophyllene oxide, and γ-terpinene.
Future studies must explore the potential occurrence of highly nematicidal EOs from the Lamiaceae and Compositae families of plants and give particular attention to the genus Monarda and Artemisia. The genus Monarda has 31 species and subspecies, while Artemisia has 530 (species accepted names according to The Plant List—http://www.theplantlist.org, accessed on 1 December 2020).
Uncovering the mechanisms of action of EOs against RKN is an important step towards successfully establishing EOs as environmentally friendly nematicides. Essential oils have been reported to show diverse bioactivities, including antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antimalarial, insecticide, insect repellent, antidepressant, anticancer, antimutagenic, hepatoprotective, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, anticonvulsant, analgesic, and antipyretic. In over 20,000 studies reporting EO biological activity, ca. 25% were performed on the antioxidant activity, 12% on antimicrobial activities, and 11% on insecticidal and insect repellent activities [17]. In future work, attention should be given to the interplay of reactive oxygen species between RKNs and plant host as oxidative stress is known to play an important role in host susceptibility [18].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.S.F.; methodology, J.M.S.F.; software, J.M.S.F.; investigation, J.M.S.F.; resources, J.M.S.F.; writing—original draft preparation, J.M.S.F.; writing—review and editing, J.M.S.F. and A.M.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (Jorge M. S. Faria) upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Poveda, J.; Abril-Urias, P.; Escobar, C. Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes by filamentous fungi inducers of resistance: Trichoderma, mycorrhizal and endophytic fungi. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Escobar, C.; Barcala, M.; Cabrera, J.; Fenoll, C. Chapter One—Overview of Root-Knot Nematodes and Giant Cells. In Plant Nematode Interactions; Escobar, C., Fenoll, C., Eds.; Academic Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 73, pp. 1–32. ISBN 0065-2296. [Google Scholar]
  3. Organization European and Mediterranean Plant Protection (EPPO) EPPO Quarentine Pests: Meloidogyne Chitwoodi. Available online: https://gd.eppo.int (accessed on 1 December 2020).
  4. Orion, D.; Kritzman, G.; Meyer, S.L.F.; Erbe, E.F.; Chitwood, D.J. A role of the gelatinous matrix in the resistance of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne spp.) eggs to microorganisms. J. Nematol. 2001, 33, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Gal, T.Z.; Aussenberg, E.R.; Burdman, S.; Kapulnik, Y.; Koltai, H. Expression of a plant expansin is involved in the establishment of root knot nematode parasitism in tomato. Planta 2006, 224, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Davis, E.L.; Hussey, R.S.; Mitchum, M.G.; Baum, T.J. Parasitism proteins in nematode-plant interactions. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11, 360–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Berg, R.H.; Fester, T.; Taylor, C.G. Development of the Root-Knot Nematode Feeding Cell BT—Cell Biology of Plant Nematode Parasitism; Berg, R.H., Taylor, C.G., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 115–152. ISBN 978-3-540-85215-5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaloshian, I.; Teixeira, M. Advances in Plant−Nematode Interactions with Emphasis on the Notorious Nematode Genus Meloidogyne. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 1988–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Sikandar, A.; Zhang, M.Y.; Wang, Y.Y.; Zhu, X.F.; Liu, X.Y.; Fan, H.Y.; Xuan, Y.H.; Chen, L.J.; Duan, Y.X. Review article: Meloidogyne incognita (root-knot nematode) a risk to agriculture. Appl. Ecol. Environ. Res. 2020, 18, 1679–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. D’Addabbo, T.; Laquale, S.; Lovelli, S.; Candido, V.; Avato, P. Biocide plants as a sustainable tool for the control of pests and pathogens in vegetable cropping systems. Ital. J. Agron. 2014, 9, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Isman, M.B. Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2006, 51, 45–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Figueiredo, A.C.; Barroso, J.G.; Pedro, L.G.; Scheffer, J.J.C. Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: Volatile components and essential oils. Flavour Fragr. J. 2008, 23, 213–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ntalli, N.G.; Ferrari, F.; Giannakou, I.; Menkissoglu-Spiroudi, U. Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of terpenes against Meloidogyne incognita and the nematicidal activity of essential oils from seven plants indigenous to Greece. Pest Manag. Sci. 2011, 67, 341–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Laquale, S.; Avato, P.; Argentieri, M.P.; Bellardi, M.G.; D’Addabbo, T. Nematotoxic activity of essential oils from Monarda species. J. Pest Sci. (2004). 2018, 91, 1115–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kalaiselvi, D.; Mohankumar, A.; Shanmugam, G.; Thiruppathi, G.; Nivitha, S.; Sundararaj, P. Altitude-related changes in the phytochemical profile of essential oils extracted from Artemisia nilagirica and their nematicidal activity against Meloidogyne incognita. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 139, 111472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Faria, J.M.S.; Sena, I.; Ribeiro, B.; Rodrigues, A.M.; Maleita, C.M.N.; Abrantes, I.; Bennett, R.; Mota, M.; da Silva Figueiredo, A.C. First report on Meloidogyne chitwoodi hatching inhibition activity of essential oils and essential oils fractions. J. Pest Sci. (2004). 2016, 89, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. León-Méndez, G.; Pájaro-Castro, N.; Pájaro-Castro, E.; Torrenegra- Alarcón, M.; Herrera-Barros, A. Essential oils as a source of bioactive molecules. Rev. Colomb. Ciencias Químico-Farmacéuticas 2019, 48, 80–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Gupta, R.; Singh, A.; Ajayakumar, P.V.; Pandey, R. Microbial interference mitigates Meloidogyne incognita mediated oxidative stress and augments bacoside content in Bacopa monnieri L. Microbiol. Res. 2017, 199, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. (a) Yearly number of reports on the activity of essential oils against root-knot nematodes and (b) yearly cumulative citation evolution of these reports.
Figure 1. (a) Yearly number of reports on the activity of essential oils against root-knot nematodes and (b) yearly cumulative citation evolution of these reports.
Blsf 03 00026 g001
Figure 2. (a) Families of plants whose essential oils were extracted for biocidal assays on root-knot nematodes and (b) plant genus ( Blsf 03 00026 i001) of the most biologically active essential oils, organized by family and EC50.
Figure 2. (a) Families of plants whose essential oils were extracted for biocidal assays on root-knot nematodes and (b) plant genus ( Blsf 03 00026 i001) of the most biologically active essential oils, organized by family and EC50.
Blsf 03 00026 g002
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faria, J.M.S.; Rodrigues, A.M. Essential Oils as Potential Biopesticides in the Control of the Genus Meloidogyne: A Review. Biol. Life Sci. Forum 2021, 3, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09687

AMA Style

Faria JMS, Rodrigues AM. Essential Oils as Potential Biopesticides in the Control of the Genus Meloidogyne: A Review. Biology and Life Sciences Forum. 2021; 3(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09687

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faria, Jorge M. S., and Ana Margarida Rodrigues. 2021. "Essential Oils as Potential Biopesticides in the Control of the Genus Meloidogyne: A Review" Biology and Life Sciences Forum 3, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/IECAG2021-09687

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop