Learner Engagement and Demographic Influences in Brazilian Massive Open Online Courses: Aprenda Mais Platform Case Study
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Similar Studies
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Methodology
- Income and Accessibility: While MOOCs are often low-cost or free, appealing to learners from diverse income backgrounds, an analysis of income levels is crucial to identify disparities in access to the necessary technology and internet connectivity. This is vital in addressing the digital divide and ensuring that MOOCs are genuinely inclusive, especially for those who could benefit most from these educational opportunities.
- Disability and Inclusivity: Assessing disability in MOOCs is critical to enhance accessibility. MOOC platforms and course content should adhere to universal design principles, making them accessible to individuals with various physical and learning abilities. This approach is not just fair but also widens the potential learner base, positioning MOOCs as a more universally beneficial educational resource.
- Race/Color and Representation: Analyzing race and color in MOOC participation helps understand representation issues and the cultural relevance of course content. Knowing the racial and ethnic makeup of MOOC learners can inform the creation of more inclusive and diverse materials, resonating with a wider audience and identifying potential barriers faced by learners from different racial backgrounds, such as language or cultural nuances.
- Geographic Location and Learning Context: The geographic location of learners, whether from urban or rural areas, developed or developing countries, significantly affects their learning context. Analyzing these variations can provide insights into regional educational needs, internet access, and cultural factors affecting MOOC engagement and success. Adapting MOOCs to accommodate these geographic differences can make them more effective and far-reaching.
- Performance and Student Path Data: Student performance indicators, particularly “Initial Course Grades”, are crucial. These initial grades help analyze the relationship between academic performance and the likelihood of enrolling in further courses. “Enrollment in Subsequent Courses” is a vital metric reflecting a student’s choice to continue their education. This enrollment symbolizes more than just signing up for additional classes; it has a tangible sign of a student’s enduring commitment to their academic path. Last, the “Completion of Subsequent Courses” goes beyond enrollment, examining whether students not only join but also accomplish these courses. This completion rate is key to understanding educational persistence and achievement, providing insights into how students maintain their academic endeavors.
3.2. Aprenda Mais Platform
3.3. Our Study Data
- Income: Students’ income levels were categorized into various groups, such as ‘Up to 0.5 minimum wage’, ‘0.5 to 1 minimum wage’, and ‘Above 3.5 minimum wages’, among others. This categorization should reflect the economic backgrounds of the students and assess how this factor influences their educational choices.
- Race/Color: Students’ racial or ethnic backgrounds were identified, with categories including ‘White’, ‘Black’, ‘Brown’, and others. This segmentation was crucial to investigate the role of racial and ethnic diversity in educational participation and engagement.
- Disability: This variable identified students with disabilities, offering insights into how physical or mental challenges might influence their educational journeys. Understanding the experiences of these students is key to creating more inclusive educational environments.
- Geographic Location: The location of students was classified as ‘urban’ or ‘rural’, based on the Brazilian capitals’ list. This helped to discern the differences in educational opportunities and preferences between urban and rural settings.
- Initial Course Grades: The grades achieved by students in their initial courses were analyzed to explore the relationship between academic performance and the likelihood of enrolling in further courses. This could show whether initial success or struggles impact students’ decisions to continue their education.
- Enrollment in Subsequent Courses: This crucial dependent variable showed whether students pursued additional courses after completing their initial course.
- Completion of Subsequent Courses: Beyond enrollment, the completion of these subsequent courses was also scrutinized. This was essential to understanding patterns in educational persistence and achievement, offering insights into how students sustain their efforts and succeed in further courses.
- Socioeconomic Status Impact: By categorizing students into different income levels, the study aimed to explore how socioeconomic status affects educational choices. This approach sought to understand if and how financial constraints influence a student’s ability to access and engage with further education.
- Racial and Ethnic Influences: The inclusion of the race/color variable allowed the analysis to delve into how racial and ethnic backgrounds impact educational participation. This investigation was crucial to understand whether certain racial or ethnic groups face unique challenges or advantages in the educational landscape.
- Geographic Disparities: Including geographic location as a variable aimed at revealing disparities in educational access and preferences between urban and rural settings. This was vital in understanding how location influences the availability of educational resources and the willingness or ability of students to engage in further education.
- Academic Performance and commitment: The analysis of initial course grades provided insights into whether academic performance could be a predictor of commitment to further education. It explored the possibility that higher initial grades might correlate with a greater likelihood of enrolling in and completing subsequent courses.
4. Results and Analysis
4.1. Preliminary Findings
- Re-Enrollment Timing: Students typically re-enroll in subsequent courses relatively quickly after completing an initial course. A significant majority do so within 30 days, with noticeable enrollments also occurring within 91–180 days and 181–365 days. On average, students take about 119.75 days to enroll in another course following the completion of a previous one. This timeframe varies widely, from immediate re-enrollment on the same day to as long as 781 days.
- Subsequent Course Enrollment and Completion: On average, students enroll in about 8.03 courses, with a completion rate hovering around 42.14%. This suggests a moderately high level of engagement in continuous learning.
- Academic Performance: The average initial course grade across all students is 82.35. Notably, students who complete subsequent courses have a marginally higher average initial grade (82.38) than those who enroll but do not complete them (81.99). The average grade in subsequent courses (82.11) is slightly lower than in the initial course, showing a consistent level of academic performance throughout their educational journey.
- Enrollment in Subsequent Courses: A high percentage (88.52%) of students enroll in subsequent courses, while 11.48% do not engage in any further courses. These data show a strong inclination towards continuous learning among most of the student body.
- Popular Initial and Subsequent Courses: Certain initial courses, such as ‘Inglês 1’ (English 1), ‘Aprendizagem Significativa’ (Significant Learning), and ‘Administração Financeira’ (Financial Administration), have proven effective in motivating students to enroll in subsequent courses. For subsequent courses, ‘Inglês 1’, ‘Psicologia da Aprendizagem’ (Psychology of Learning), and ‘Espanhol 1’ (Spanish 1) are among the most popular.
4.2. Hypothesis
5. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Mengual Andrés, S.; Lloret Català, M.D.C.; Roig Vila, R. Validación del Cuestionario de evaluación de la calidad de cursos virtuales adaptado a MOOC. Rev. Iberoam. Educ. A Distancia 2015, 18, 145–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Siemens, G. Connectivism: Creating a learning ecology in distributed environments. In Didactics of Microlearning. Concepts, Discourses and Examples; Hug, T., Ed.; Waxmann Publishing Co.: Münster, Germany, 2007; pp. 53–68. [Google Scholar]
- Cormier, D.; Siemens, G. The open course: Through the open door--open courses as research, learning, and engagement. EDUCAUSE Rev. 2010, 45, 30–39. [Google Scholar]
- Butcher, N. Technologies in Higher Education: Mapping the Terrain; Unesco: New York, NY, USA, 2014; Available online: https://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214737.pdf (accessed on 27 December 2023).
- Castillo, N.M.; Lee, J.; Zahra, F.T.; Wagner, D.A. MOOCS for development: Trends, challenges, and opportunities. Int. Technol. Int. Dev. 2015, 11, 35. [Google Scholar]
- Downes, S. The quality of massive open online courses. In International Handbook of E-Learning; Routledge: London, UK, 2015; Volume 1, pp. 65–78. [Google Scholar]
- Yousef, A.M.F.; Chatti, M.A.; Schroeder, U.; Wosnitza, M.; Jakobs, H. MOOCs—A Review of the State-of-the-Art. In International Conference on Computer Supported Education; SCITEPRESS: Setúbal, Portugal, 2014; Volume 2, pp. 9–20. [Google Scholar]
- Littlejohn, A.; Hood, N.; Milligan, C.; Mustain, P. Learning in MOOCs: Motivations and self-regulated learning in MOOCs. Internet High. Educ. 2016, 29, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollands, F.; Tirthali, D. Why Do Institutions Offer MOOCs? 2014. Available online: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1043160.pdf (accessed on 27 December 2023).
- Baturay, M.H. An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci. 2015, 174, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministério da Educação. Plataforma Aprenda Mais. 2023. Available online: https://aprendamais.mec.gov.br/ (accessed on 27 December 2023).
- Gil-Jaurena, I.; Callejo-Gallego, J.; Agudo, Y. Evaluation of the UNED MOOCs implementation: Demographics, learners’ opinions and completion rates. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2017, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kizilcec, R.F.; Saltarelli, A.J. Can a diversity statement increase diversity in MOOCs? In Proceedings of the Sixth (2019) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale, Chicago, IL, USA, 24–25 June 2019; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Perna, L.W.; Ruby, A.; Boruch, R.F.; Wang, N.; Scull, J.; Ahmad, S.; Evans, C. Moving through MOOCs: Understanding the progression of users in massive open online courses. Educ. Res. 2014, 43, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Davis, D.; Chen, G.; Hauff, C.; Houben, G.J. Gauging MOOC Learners’ Adherence to the Designed Learning Path. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, Raleigh, NC, USA, 29 June–2 July 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Rizvi, S.; Rienties, B.; Rogaten, J. Temporal dynamics of MOOC learning trajectories. In Proceedings of the First International Conference on Data Science, E-Learning and Information Systems, Madrid, Spain, 1–2 October 2018; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, P.J.; Reinecke, K. Demographic Differences in How Students Navigate Through MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale, Atlanta, GA, USA, 4–5 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Yin, R.K. Case Study Research: Design and Methods; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Gray, D.E. Doing Research in the Real World; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Creswell, J.W.; Creswell, J.D. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Olsen, W. Data Collection: Key Debates and Methods in Social; Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Levine, D.M.; Son, M.L.; Stephan, D. Even You Can Learn Statistics, 4th ed.; Addison-Wesley Professional: Boston, MA, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Brazil. Lei nº 11.892, de 29 de Dezembro de 2008. Institui a Rede Federal de Educação Profissional, Científica e Tecnológica, cria os Institutos Federais de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia, e dá Outras Providências. 2008. Available online: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2008/lei/l11892.htm (accessed on 27 December 2023).
- Pacheco, E.; Fiorucci, R. 15 Anos Dos Institutos Federais: História, Políticas e Desafios; Editora Parque Itaipu: Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Silva, J.G. Institutos Federais dos Brasileiros: A História Contada por Quem fez; Artliber editora: São Paulo, Brazil, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Ministério da Educação. Plataforma Nilo Peçanha. 2023. Available online: https://www.gov.br/mec/pt-br/pnp/pnp-plataforma-nilo-pecanha (accessed on 27 December 2023).
- Iniesto, F.; McAndrew, P.; Minocha, S.; Coughlan, T. A mixed-methods study with MOOC learners to understand their motivations and accessibility needs. In Open Educational Resources in Higher Education: A Global Perspective; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 175–201. [Google Scholar]
- Cinquin, P.A.; Guitton, P.; Sauzéon, H. Designing accessible MOOCs to expand educational opportunities for persons with cognitive impairments. Behav. Inf. Technol. 2021, 40, 1101–1119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, L.; Lee, C.S. Leveraging MOOCs for learners in economically disadvantaged regions. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 12243–12268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cagiltay, N.E.; Toker, S.; Cagiltay, K. Exploring the Influence of Countries’ Economic Conditions on Massive Open Online Course (MOOC) Participation: A Study of 3.5 Million MITx Learners. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distrib. Learn. 2023, 24, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maphosa, V.; Maphosa, M. Opportunities and Challenges of Adopting MOOCs in Africa: A Systematic Literature Review. In Massive Open Online Courses—Current Practice and Future Trends; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Wei, X.; Saab, N.; Admiraal, W. Do learners share the same perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs? Identifying the role of motivation, perceived learning support, learning engagement, and self-regulated learning strategies. Internet High. Educ. 2023, 56, 100880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Silva, J.M.C.d.; Pedroso, G.H.; Veber, A.B.; Maruyama, Ú.G.R. Learner Engagement and Demographic Influences in Brazilian Massive Open Online Courses: Aprenda Mais Platform Case Study. Analytics 2024, 3, 178-193. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics3020010
Silva JMCd, Pedroso GH, Veber AB, Maruyama ÚGR. Learner Engagement and Demographic Influences in Brazilian Massive Open Online Courses: Aprenda Mais Platform Case Study. Analytics. 2024; 3(2):178-193. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics3020010
Chicago/Turabian StyleSilva, Júlia Marques Carvalho da, Gabriela Hahn Pedroso, Augusto Basso Veber, and Úrsula Gomes Rosa Maruyama. 2024. "Learner Engagement and Demographic Influences in Brazilian Massive Open Online Courses: Aprenda Mais Platform Case Study" Analytics 3, no. 2: 178-193. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics3020010
APA StyleSilva, J. M. C. d., Pedroso, G. H., Veber, A. B., & Maruyama, Ú. G. R. (2024). Learner Engagement and Demographic Influences in Brazilian Massive Open Online Courses: Aprenda Mais Platform Case Study. Analytics, 3(2), 178-193. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytics3020010