Rethinking Leadership Development: Contributions from Theory and Research
A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X).
Deadline for manuscript submissions: 1 October 2024 | Viewed by 10795
Special Issue Editors
Interests: human adaptation to stress; leadership and team performance; life skills; human performance training
Special Issue Information
Dear Colleagues,
Leadership and leadership development in numerous contexts (e.g., healthcare, organizations, and sport) have received a particularly large amount of interest from scholars and practitioners around the world. More recent approaches (e.g., ethical leadership, servant leadership, and empowering leadership) have continuously highlighted the critical role that leaders play in the success (or failure) of their organizations. ‘Good’ and effective leaders can enhance team members’ well-being, performance and commitment to the organization, while ‘bad’ leaders may increase members’ stress, dissatisfaction and turnover intentions. These impacts are even recognized in the field, with billions of dollars being spent annually on developing leadership across different organizational levels (cf. Training Industry, 2019).
In this Special Issue, we are seeking theoretical and empirical contributions regarding the development of leadership. This includes (but is not limited to) empirical research testing the effectiveness of intervention programs, systematic reviews involving leadership training, and theory-based guidelines for leadership interventions and leadership development. Other conceptual or qualitative research studies that explain how to develop positive and effective leadership are also within the scope of this Special Issue.
Dr. A. Rui Gomes
Dr. Catarina Morais
Guest Editors
Manuscript Submission Information
Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.
Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Behavioral Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.
Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.
Keywords
- promoting leadership
- leadership interventions
- development of leadership
- leadership training
- leadership efficacy
- performance
Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue
- Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
- Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
- Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
- External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
- e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.
Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.
Planned Papers
The below list represents only planned manuscripts. Some of these manuscripts have not been received by the Editorial Office yet. Papers submitted to MDPI journals are subject to peer-review.
Title: Lifting Leaders and their Employees to Higher Levels of Well-being: Results from a Transformational Leadership Field Development Program
Authors: Margaret McKee; Cathy Driscoll; E. Kevin Kelloway
Affiliation: Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, NS
Dalhousie University, Halifax NS
Abstract: Intervention studies have demonstrated that it is possible to enhance transformational leadership abilities; however, few longitudinal studies have explored the impact of such development programs on employee and leader well-being. In Study 1, we randomly assigned organizational leaders to either a treatment or a wait-list control group. We assessed the effects of a transformational leadership development program on the mental well-being of leaders and their direct-reports, using multilevel analyses of survey data collected from both leaders and their direct-reports prior to the start of the leadership development program, and three months post. Following the intervention, employees reported that trained leaders demonstrated enhanced transformational leadership and this, in turn, was associated with increases in the employees’ reported mental health. Separate analyses revealed leaders who were trained also reported increases over baseline in their own mental health. In Study 2, we conducted follow-up interviews with a select group of leaders whose employee survey results showed the most significant improvements in their transformational leadership ratings to explore the transfer of training. These interviews provided insights into the leaders’ training experiences and the impact on their mental well-being. Implications for practice and research from these results are discussed.
Title: Developing Servant Leadership through Experience and Practice: A Case Study in Service-Learning
Authors: Matt Robinson; Sean Dahlin; Mar Magnusen
Affiliation: Schreiner University
Central Washington University
Baylor University
Abstract: Characterized by altruistic calling as the core motivation, servant leadership comprises enduring qualities of genuine caring, humility, and empathy, and in recent years, has become a style of leadership recommended to be addressed in sport management classrooms because of its’ associated positive outcomes and emphasis on ethical behavior and decision-making (Robinson et al., 2018). Within the realm of interscholastic sport, servant leadership of athletic directors has been viewed as an effective style by head coaches (Robinson et al., 2020). As the relevance and popularity of servant leadership continues to grow, it gives rise to matters of how this approach to leadership can be better studied and taught to current and aspirant sport professionals. Volunteer service opportunities, for example, is one way for undergraduate students to learn about servant leadership. Indeed, the Association of American Colleges and Universities recommends service-learning and community-based learning experiences because they can enhance student engagement and retention. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is three-fold. First, explore how service-learning projects can be used to teach servant leadership in undergraduate sport management classrooms. Next, provide a qualitative evaluation of undergraduate student reflections on service projects within a servant leadership framework (i.e., genuine caring, empathy, humility). Third, discuss the impact of service-learning projects on improving students’ understanding of servant leadership and overall leadership development.
Title: It’s Leadership, but (maybe) not as you know it: Exploring the global to understand leadership in sport.
Authors: Tania Gaye Cassidy; Gary Leo Byrne
Affiliation: University of Otago
Abstract: If leadership practices are to be relevant and beneficial for our increasingly diverse communities then orthodox views of leadership, which tend to reflect ‘an Anglo-Western-male capitalistic perspective’, need to be challenged [1] (p. 323). Asking questions of the orthodox views of leadership may go some way to explain who, and what, is considered congruent with the concept of ‘leader’ and why women are underrepresented in elite sports coaching and in national and international sport governance positions. One way to challenge this leadership orthodoxy is to shift the discussion away from primarily focusing on the individual leader-member exchange towards a broader discussion that includes sociocultural, pedagogical, and indigenous orientations towards leadership as well as focus more on collectivist meaning-making rather than towards competitive unidirectional leader-centrism. Increasingly, in the literature and in practice there are examples that suggest we are on the brink of a paradigm shift in how we understand and practice leadership in sports coaching and in sports organisations. The purpose of this article is to contribute to the discussion on paradigm shifts that challenge the ethno-centric, gender-biased, leader-centric orthodoxy by advancing an expanded global and diverse leadership paradigm that is underpinned by clearly delineated dimensions of diversity and of cultural competence that can be used as a mechanism to rethink sport leadership.
Title: Growing Greener: Cultivating Organisational Sustainability Through Leadership Development
Authors: Sarah Lily Resanovich
Affiliation: School of Psychology, University of Kent
Abstract: Human-created climate change is the driver of natural disasters globally, affecting every nation (IPCC, 2021). Organisations significantly contribute to climate change through the use of resources and carbon emissions. Organisations can begin to address this by implementing policies that support pro-environmental behaviour (PEB) among employees. PEBs at work vary from reducing electricity usage to choosing sustainable suppliers and fostering collaborative sustainability efforts. Many social-psychological factors impact an employee’s likelihood of performing PEB. Among social-psychological factors influencing employee PEB, leadership stands out as unique as it is a factor that can simultaneously control or influence other factors. Leadership in the workplace is critical and makes performing PEB at work and at home different, emphasising the need for continued exploration of factors that promote PEB specifically in workplace settings. This review provides an overview of how leadership uniquely affects employee PEB. After identifying leadership as a unique factor in encouraging PEB, this review provides an account of leadership development strategies to increase leaders’ ability to increase PEB, drawing from social psychology research. Then, it offers suggestions for how leadership development can better prepare leaders to increase their employees’ PEB and create organisations that work better for the planet.