Advances in Resilience Psychology

A special issue of Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 2076-328X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 June 2025 | Viewed by 5152

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychology, Long Island University Brooklyn, New York, NY 11201, USA
Interests: cultural resilience; community resilience; strength-based approach; multicultural responsiveness; cross-cultural counseling; resilience-based interventions; trauma- informed care; public policy; advocacy; government support
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Resilience involves responding to challenges in ways that foster adaptation and coping. Important early resilience research explored individual traits that were found to contribute to building resilience. Recent research in resilience has built upon these findings to explore how sociocultural contexts support resilience (Clauss-Ehlers, 2006, 2008). This research examines how larger systems can contribute to people overcoming hardships. For instance, how do communities, policies, schools, and families contribute to building resilience, both in individuals and within larger sociocultural contexts? Cultural and community resilience are two areas of this research field that have explored how cultural and community values can enhance coping and adaptability to challenges (Clauss-Ehlers, 2006, 2008). 

Understanding how to build resilience in cultural and community contexts is important and timely, given the impact of current global stressors and crises. The World Health Organization (WHO, 2022) indicates that, in just the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, we saw a 25% global increase in depression and anxiety. In another example, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) reports that, at the end of 2022, 108.4 million people were forcibly displaced across the globe (UNHCR, n.d.). The UNHCR (n.d.) also found that, at the end of 2022, 76% of refugees were hosted by low- and middle-income countries. 

These staggering realities have mental health implications for individuals and communities, such as a higher prevalence of depression and anxiety, trauma, social isolation, social anxiety, substance-use disorders, loss, poverty, and a lack of support. Moreover, along with the exponential necessity for mental health services, nations are struggling to organize mental health service structures to meet their accompanying needs. This heightened demand, alongside a lack of infrastructure, underscores a call for greater cultural and community resilience interventions, psychosocial support, and policies that provide access to and awareness of mental health services among diverse communities across the world. 

This Special Issue on Advances in Resilience Psychology is committed to exploring community-based interventions, government programs, therapeutic techniques, teaching approaches, outreach, advocacy, education, social media considerations, school-based support, and community/governmental partnerships that can strengthen resilience from a broad sociocultural, community-based perspective. In so doing, this Special Issue seeks to address the complex global problems related to levels of resilience, including, but not limited to, poverty, trauma, immigration, forced displacement, healthcare/mental healthcare access, government reform, disempowerment, advocacy, prevention efforts, public policy, and freedom. Some questions for reflection when you consider submitting your work to the Special Issue on Advances in Resilience Psychology include, but are not limited to, the following:

    How can governments implement programs that support a mental health infrastructure? How will we know that these programs are effective?

    What local policies and programs are needed to support the mental health needs of community members? How can we ensure that community members are aware of the available programs and supports? 

    What are some examples of partnerships between mental health professionals and healthcare professionals that promote mental health intervention and prevention?

    How can outreach and advocacy promote resilience on both individual and community levels?

    How can communities and governments build multiculturally responsive interventions that meet the mental health needs of diverse populations? 

    What treatment advances are needed to foster resilience and produce positive mental health outcomes? 

The call for the Special Issue on Advances in Resilience Psychology seeks to publish diverse methodologies and ways of generating knowledge that include qualitative studies, quantitative studies, literature reviews, analyses of public programs and policies, narrative accounts, teaching approaches, case studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses, among other approaches.

References

Clauss-Ehlers, C.S., Yang, Y.T., & Chen, W.J. (2006). Resilience from childhood stressors: The role of cultural resilience, ethnic identity, and gender identity. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 5, 124-138. https://doi.org/10.2513/s15289168jicap0501_7

Clauss-Ehlers, C.S. (2008). Sociocultural factors, resilience, and coping: Support for a culturally sensitive measure of resilience. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(3), 197-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.02.004

World Health Organization (2022, March 2). COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide: Wake-up call to all countries to step up mental health services and support. https://www.who.int/news/item/02-03-2022-COVID-19-pandemic-triggers-25-increase-in-prevalence-of-anxiety-and-depression-worldwide

United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (n.d.). Global Refugee Forum 2023: Global Refugee Forum delivers unity and action amid global crises. https://www.unhcr.org/us/?gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA4Y-sBhC6ARIsAGXF1g5Z2exjjAGIA9_xEMGniY7ULDxexZptoIhSAV2pRnrpu2JyEd2hHG4aAiguEALw_wcB

Keywords

  • cultural resilience
  • community resilience
  • strength-based approach
  • multicultural responsiveness
  • cross-cultural counseling
  • resilience-based interventions
  • trauma-informed care
  • public policy
  • advocacy
  • government support

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

15 pages, 200 KiB  
Article
From Guidelines to Social Media: A Content Analysis of Trauma-Informed Care on YouTube
by Aysha Jawed, Mollie Young and Sayyed Matin Zarkesh Esfahani
Behav. Sci. 2025, 15(3), 340; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15030340 - 10 Mar 2025
Viewed by 453
Abstract
Trauma-informed care is an increasingly trending clinical and organizational approach globally. Multiple guidelines exist on implementing trauma-informed care across healthcare systems, behavioral health programs, academic institutions, and prisons, among other settings. Although many studies have assessed the implementation of trauma-informed care guidelines and [...] Read more.
Trauma-informed care is an increasingly trending clinical and organizational approach globally. Multiple guidelines exist on implementing trauma-informed care across healthcare systems, behavioral health programs, academic institutions, and prisons, among other settings. Although many studies have assessed the implementation of trauma-informed care guidelines and the integration of training into curricula for healthcare providers, workforces, and in clinical practice with individuals and communities, there have been no studies previously conducted to date on assessing the existing state of coverage on trauma-informed care across social media to inform future, actionable interventions. This represents a critical gap in research and practice given the increasingly prevalent utilization and accessibility of information online, especially via a multitude of social media platforms. This study is the first to assess the sources, format, and content across one of these social media platforms on YouTube. Content on trauma-informed care was examined through conducting a descriptive, observational study to determine the depth and breadth of content that was widely covered and uncovered across the top 100 widely viewed videos. Findings revealed that most of the content was published by professional, nongovernmental sources. A wide range of resources and strategies was presented on social media for utilizing trauma-informed care across diverse settings on individual and community levels. The five principles of trauma-informed care (safety, trustworthiness, collaboration, empowerment, and choice) were heavily reviewed among the widely viewed videos. A multitude of benefits was presented in terms of implementing trauma-informed care on both micro and macro levels. Social determinants of health were not widely covered but formed some of the stressors and triggers examined among the videos. DEI principles were also scantly covered across the videos. Several clinical and organizational implications are presented. Recommendations to integrate widely covered and uncovered content as targets for intervention in informing future trauma-informed approaches are proposed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Resilience Psychology)
11 pages, 251 KiB  
Article
A 6-Item Family Resilience Scale (FRS6) for Measuring Longitudinal Trajectory of Family Adjustment
by Catherine So Kum Tang, Tiffany Sok U Siu, Tak Sang Chow and Sin Hang Kwok
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(3), 251; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14030251 - 20 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1914
Abstract
Two studies were conducted in Hong Kong to validate a brief measure of family resilience based on the three-factor CPR model. The CPR model stipulates that family resilience comprises three major factors: Communication and Connectedness (C), Positive Framing (P), and External Resources (R). [...] Read more.
Two studies were conducted in Hong Kong to validate a brief measure of family resilience based on the three-factor CPR model. The CPR model stipulates that family resilience comprises three major factors: Communication and Connectedness (C), Positive Framing (P), and External Resources (R). Study 1 abbreviated the 16-item Family Resilience Scale (FRS16) into six items (FRS6) with a parent sample in the community (N = 1270). Study 2 tested the validity of the FRS6 with a single parent sample (N = 336). The result of Study 1 suggests a dominant general family resilience factor structure with three distinct subfactors. The highest factor loading items from each of the three subfactors were retained in the six-item FRS6. The resultant FRS6 was internally consistent and related to various correlates in similar or better strengths as compared to the FRS16. The results of a separate sample in Study 2 indicated that the FRS6 demonstrated satisfactory internal reliability and correlated significantly with individual resilience, quality of life, anxiety, and depression in the expected directions. Both studies supported that the FRS6 is a psychometrically sound measure of family resilience and can be used in longitudinal studies that aim to chart the trajectory of family adjustment following life adversities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Resilience Psychology)

Review

Jump to: Research

15 pages, 628 KiB  
Review
Implications of Cash Transfer Programs for Mental Health Promotion among Families Facing Significant Stressors: Using Ecological Systems Theory to Explain Successes of Conditional and Unconditional Programs
by Tali L. Lesser, Maya Matalon and Caroline S. Clauss-Ehlers
Behav. Sci. 2024, 14(9), 770; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14090770 - 2 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1918
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to apply Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory to explore the literature on how Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) and Unconditional Cash Transfer (UCT) programs might support positive mental health outcomes. The paper begins with transnational considerations of stress, such [...] Read more.
The purpose of this paper is to apply Bronfenbrenner’s ecological systems theory to explore the literature on how Conditional Cash Transfer (CCT) and Unconditional Cash Transfer (UCT) programs might support positive mental health outcomes. The paper begins with transnational considerations of stress, such as poverty and COVID-19, and their impact on mental health. Bronfenbrenner’s theory is applied to better understand the mechanisms by which CCT and UCT programs can potentially lead to positive outcomes for children and families who face such stressors. The implications of cash transfer programs are subsequently discussed in terms of how they might promote positive mental health outcomes among families globally. This theoretical application paper concludes with a call for transnational research to explore connections between cash transfer programs and mental health outcomes for children/adolescents and their parents/caregivers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Resilience Psychology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop