Searching for Non-random Genome Editing Mechanisms: Pathogen-Induced Immune Mechanism Evolution and Immune Mechanism Exaptation for Organism Adaptation and Evolution

A special issue of Cells (ISSN 2073-4409). This special issue belongs to the section "Cellular Immunology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2022) | Viewed by 4557

Special Issue Editor

1. Department of Biomolecular Science, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, 61029 Urbino, Italy
2. National Institute for Nuclear Physics (INFN)-Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS), Assergi, L’Aquila, Italy
Interests: immunity; natural killer cell biology; infectious diseases; haematopoiesis; evolution; ionising radiation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

There is a body of unexplainable “weird” evidence regarding eukaryotic species that suggests the existence of some “smart” nonrandom genome editing mechanisms. In this regard, the immune system can be considered a “military” biotechnological laboratory that, “trained” by pathogens, develops "smart" biomolecular technologies which are ultimately exapted for “civil” purposes, i.e., adaptation of organisms as whole. Indeed, being pushed due to survival conflicts with pathogens, the immune system produces random and iterative attempts to counter pathogen threats that are not necessarily aimed at excluding the foreigner but, rather, to select the most virus–host compatible structures. Most notably are some adaptive genetic attempts to generate new (self) proteins that can be recognised as extraneous (non-self) by the immune system, leading to an autoimmune response. On the other hand, some microorganisms in persistent interaction with an organism become an integral part of the organism and are not threatened by the immune system. Therefore, the immune system, rather than discriminating between self and non-self, seems to ultimately work as a scavenger that, by eliminating “inadequate” attempts, finally allows the selection of the most self-compatible and symbiotic structures. Among these iterative attempts, there are some special ones that lead to not only organism but also pathogen survival inside the organism; a sort of agreement in which they potentiate each other to promote a synergistic survival effect also called symbiosis or symbiogenesis. These are the most stable biological solutions that are repetitively selected along the struggle for survival, finally generating holobiontic organisms. These organisms are able to cohabit with microorganisms and to store more and more epigenetic and genetic information in their large eukaryotic genomes. Nevertheless, they still maintain genomic flexibility and adaptability to environmental changes through stress-induced nonrandom genome editing mechanisms. Indeed, during host–pathogen conflicts, genome editing events are randomly generated and those which can produce effective pathways of survival advantage, are selected and memorised, and become novel reproducible “mechanisms”. One example of these mechanisms is the somatic hypermutation (SHM) of immunoglobulins, in which the single-cell genome of a B cell can generate different cell phenotypes as a function of environmental stress conditions. Immunoglobulin gene plasticity induced by random immunoglobulin gene mutation is activated in response to chronic presence of pathogen antigens and provides the raw material for selection of the most environmentally effective phenotype. Notably, within the huge eukaryotic genome, there is a nonrandom and exclusive targeting of the immunoglobulin gene in which random mutations are induced, leaving the rest of the genome intact. Novel somatic biotechnological tools built up by immune system (e.g., SHM) are then shared through horizontal genomic transfer with other organs, including germline cells which ultimately transmit them to progeny for species adaptation. Indeed, I have recently described how the majority of cell proteins in an organism can modify their structures similarly to SHM, plastically adapting them to new “pollutants” interfering with their functions. Interference of a pollutant with a cell protein is able to induce its specific gene hypertranscription. However, genes that are transcribed at their maximum rate (hypertranscribed) yet are still unable to meet new chronic environmental demands, are environmentally inadequate and generate more and more intronic retrotransposons. Finally, retrotransposon-guided mutagenic enzymes would be able to edit hyperfunctional and inadequate genes, generating several cell mutants, and those codifying for the most environmentally adequate proteins would have a survival advantage and, therefore, would be Darwinianly selected. Such mechanisms represent the exaptation of an antiviral mutagenic mechanism (i.e., SHM) into nonrandom genome editing mechanisms directed at “hypertranscribed” endogenous genes of the entire organism. Transposon-guided mutagenic enzymes and horizontal “genomic” transfer are some of the biological technologies developed through pathogen training and pathogen domestication to predispose life to counteract present challenges and to prevent future unpredictable environmental threats and were therefore “naturally” selected. However, nonrandom genome editing mechanisms, depending on the individual genomic background and environmental changes, can lead to outcomes ranging from adaptive survival and evolutionary advantage or, alternatively, to chronic diseases and death of environmentally inadequate genomes. In the present Special Issue of Cells, experts in the field will describe the state-of-the-art of nonrandom genome editing mechanisms and their involvement both in the past steps of the evolutionary processes and in the present as underlying causes of novel adaptations or diseases.

We are looking forward to your contributions to this Special Issue. 

Prof. Loris Zamai
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cells is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • virus
  • immune system
  • pollution
  • environmental stress
  • retrotransposons
  • mutagenic enzymes
  • symbiosis
  • horizontal genomic transfer
  • transgenerational non-Mendelian gene transmission
  • chronic diseases

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

32 pages, 1347 KiB  
Review
Non-Random Genome Editing and Natural Cellular Engineering in Cognition-Based Evolution
by William B. Miller, Jr., Francisco J. Enguita and Ana Lúcia Leitão
Cells 2021, 10(5), 1125; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10051125 - 7 May 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4036
Abstract
Neo-Darwinism presumes that biological variation is a product of random genetic replication errors and natural selection. Cognition-Based Evolution (CBE) asserts a comprehensive alternative approach to phenotypic variation and the generation of biological novelty. In CBE, evolutionary variation is the product of natural cellular [...] Read more.
Neo-Darwinism presumes that biological variation is a product of random genetic replication errors and natural selection. Cognition-Based Evolution (CBE) asserts a comprehensive alternative approach to phenotypic variation and the generation of biological novelty. In CBE, evolutionary variation is the product of natural cellular engineering that permits purposive genetic adjustments as cellular problem-solving. CBE upholds that the cornerstone of biology is the intelligent measuring cell. Since all biological information that is available to cells is ambiguous, multicellularity arises from the cellular requirement to maximize the validity of available environmental information. This is best accomplished through collective measurement purposed towards maintaining and optimizing individual cellular states of homeorhesis as dynamic flux that sustains cellular equipoise. The collective action of the multicellular measurement and assessment of information and its collaborative communication is natural cellular engineering. Its yield is linked cellular ecologies and mutualized niche constructions that comprise biofilms and holobionts. In this context, biological variation is the product of collective differential assessment of ambiguous environmental cues by networking intelligent cells. Such concerted action is enabled by non-random natural genomic editing in response to epigenetic impacts and environmental stresses. Random genetic activity can be either constrained or deployed as a ‘harnessing of stochasticity’. Therefore, genes are cellular tools. Selection filters cellular solutions to environmental stresses to assure continuous cellular-organismal-environmental complementarity. Since all multicellular eukaryotes are holobionts as vast assemblages of participants of each of the three cellular domains (Prokaryota, Archaea, Eukaryota) and the virome, multicellular variation is necessarily a product of co-engineering among them. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop