Clinical Guidelines/Expert Consensus on Diagnostics

A topical collection in Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418). This collection belongs to the section "Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis".

Viewed by 945

Editor

Topical Collection Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Topical Collection, ‘Clinical Guidelines/Expert Consensus on Diagnostics’, focuses on the pivotal area of diagnostic practices in medicine. It will compile the latest clinical guidelines and expert consensuses from leading professionals across various medical specialties, providing a comprehensive resource for healthcare providers. These guidelines offer evidence-based recommendations to enhance diagnostic accuracy, reduce misdiagnosis, and improve patient outcomes. By synthesizing expert knowledge and research findings, this Topical Collection aims to standardize diagnostic approaches and foster better patient care globally.

Dr. Zhongheng Zhang
Collection Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the collection website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Diagnostics is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • diagnosis
  • screening
  • markers
  • prognosis
  • clinical guidelines
  • expert consensus

Published Papers (2 papers)

2025

13 pages, 667 KB  
Article
Orchidopexy Timing and Follow Up: From Guidelines to Clinical Practice
by Cristina Gavrilovici, Alma-Raluca Laptoiu, Elena Hanganu, Iulia Carmen Ciongradi, Monika Glass, Valentin Munteanu, Anastasia Chirvasa, Ancuta Lupu, Petronela Pirtica, Elena-Lia Spoială and Lucian Boiculese
Diagnostics 2025, 15(18), 2318; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15182318 - 12 Sep 2025
Abstract
Background: Undescended testis (UDT) is the most frequent pediatric anomaly of the male genitals, with a high incidence in premature male neonates. Due to the risk of long-term complications such as infertility, testicular malignancy, and psychological distress, special attention on the accuracy [...] Read more.
Background: Undescended testis (UDT) is the most frequent pediatric anomaly of the male genitals, with a high incidence in premature male neonates. Due to the risk of long-term complications such as infertility, testicular malignancy, and psychological distress, special attention on the accuracy of management is needed. Despite the existence of well-established guidelines recommending early surgical intervention, significant delays in diagnosis, referral, and treatment are still observed in practice. Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the clinical management practices of undescended testis at a tertiary pediatric referral center over a ten-year period, with a particular focus on identifying risk factors associated with the development of postoperative testicular atrophy. Material and Methods: The following variables were extracted from patient records: the UDT location, age at surgery (we also recorded the mean age per year during the 10 years period), laterality (unilateral or bilateral), associated malformations and comorbidities, family history of UDT in first-degree relatives, type of surgical intervention (open vs. laparoscopic orchidopexy), and imaging diagnosis (ultrasonography, computer tomography). We considered testicular atrophy (TA) as negative outcome after orchidopexy. To identify the variables that independently contribute to the risk of postoperative testicular atrophy, we conducted a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 1082 pediatric patients UDT underwent orchidopexy between 2014 and 2023. The median age at surgery was 5.07 years, significantly exceeding current guideline recommendations. TA was observed in 24.8% of cases. Non-palpable testes, higher testicular position (particularly intra-abdominal), associated comorbidities, positive family history, and delayed surgical intervention were identified as independent risk factors for negative outcomes. The multivariate logistic regression model identified the most significant predictors of postoperative testicular atrophy as the presence of comorbidities (associated with more than an eightfold increase in risk), non-palpable testes (3.35 times higher risk compared to palpable ones), a positive family history of undescended testis (approximately 2.7 times higher risk), and older age at surgery, with each additional year of delay increasing the risk by 28.6%. Conclusions: Despite the availability of well-established guidelines, significant delays in the diagnosis and treatment of UDT persist in clinical practice. Testicular atrophy remains a relevant postoperative complication, particularly in patients with non-palpable testes, high testicular position, comorbidities, and late surgical intervention. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 2689 KB  
Review
Diagnostic Criteria and Technical Evaluation of Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: A Narrative Review
by Shahnaz Fooladi, Jamal Hasoon, Alan D. Kaye and Alaa Abd-Elsayed
Diagnostics 2025, 15(17), 2281; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15172281 - 8 Sep 2025
Viewed by 216
Abstract
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain disorder with several sensory, autonomic, motor, and trophic symptoms. Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria like the Budapest Criteria, but there are limitations to those criteria, especially for pediatric cases and different clinical presentations. [...] Read more.
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic pain disorder with several sensory, autonomic, motor, and trophic symptoms. Diagnosis is based on clinical criteria like the Budapest Criteria, but there are limitations to those criteria, especially for pediatric cases and different clinical presentations. Technical testing—including laboratory tests, electrophysiological studies, sensory and autonomic function tests, and more advanced imaging—provides supportive, but not definitive, evidence. Biomarkers such as certain microRNAs, inflammatory mediators, and autoantibodies may offer the potential for improved diagnostic accuracy, although they have not yet been adequately validated. New imaging techniques, including ultrasound elastography and neuroimaging, have identified both peripheral and central pathophysiological changes in CRPS. We can improve our diagnosis of CRPS by integrating standardized clinical criteria with technical evaluations and biomarker improvements; this should serve to make diagnosis earlier, reduce diagnostic delay, and promote individualized treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop