Effects of Strengths-Based Interventions for Promoting Social and Emotional Wellbeing among Special Student Populations

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "Education and Psychology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2024) | Viewed by 1643

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA
Interests: gifted youth development; social and emotional wellbeing; motivation and identity development; psychological resilience

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152, USA
Interests: early childhood and elementary education; epistemological development; social and emotional wellbeing in special populations; mentoring teacher educators; online instruction and pedagogy

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Psychological Studies in Education, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA
Interests: positive youth development; social and emotional wellbeing; psychological strengths

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Guided by the "whole child" movement in education, it is increasingly recognized that schools are places where students not only learn requisite cognitive skills and knowledge, but also undergo critical social and emotional development. Scholars, educators, and many other professionals have realized that the social, psychological, and emotional development of students is as important, or more important, compared to academic achievement, and for the long-term success of the student as a “whole person”. In recent decades, education has expanded beyond a deficit model that focuses on “fixing” problems in order to bring remediation, and has begun to adopt a strengths-based approach to understanding student functioning and achievement. This conceptual advancement has had an important impact on the design and implementation of intervention strategies and programs that aim to promote social and emotional development in the school, home, and community. Research in this field is still emerging, and for some student populations, it remains even less studied; such research includes investigating how to use strengths-based approaches in designing interventions for gifted students, young children (e.g., P-3), and students with special needs (e.g., disabilities).

The focus of this Special Issue is on how "best practices" in strengths-based interventions can be applied in the home or school environment, or both, to enhance social and emotional wellbeing among special student populations. Contributions to this Special Issue should focus on:

  • Strengths-based interventions, including the discussion of "best practices" in the home, school, or both.
  • Social and emotional wellbeing promotion.
  • Special student populations (e.g., gifted, P-3, and special needs).

Contributions to this Special Issue can include, but are not limited to:

  • Conceptual and theoretical discussions.
  • Empirical studies (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method).
  • Reviews and meta-analyses.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Dr. Christian E. Mueller
Dr. Denise L. Winsor
Dr. Xu Lilya Jiang
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • strengths-based
  • social and emotional wellbeing
  • interventions
  • special populations
  • gifted
  • P-3
  • special needs

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 519 KiB  
Article
Building Resilience into Classrooms: A Participatory Action Approach
by Beth Doll and Kyle Bizal
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(5), 511; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050511 - 10 May 2024
Viewed by 453
Abstract
The ClassMaps strategy builds resilience into classrooms by translating the compelling results of developmental risk and resilience research into simple action plans that embed positive protective supports into classroom routines and practices. The refined routines reinforce students’ developing self-agency and foster their nurturing [...] Read more.
The ClassMaps strategy builds resilience into classrooms by translating the compelling results of developmental risk and resilience research into simple action plans that embed positive protective supports into classroom routines and practices. The refined routines reinforce students’ developing self-agency and foster their nurturing relationships with adults and peers. The strategy is carried out in four stages—administering the ClassMaps Survey to describe students’ experiences of classroom strengths and weaknesses, conducting a classroom meeting with students to scrutinize the results and brainstorm plans for change, implementing simple modifications to classroom routines and practices based on that plan, and evaluating the impact of the modifications a few weeks later. The ClassMaps Survey’s central role in the strategy is justified by the reliability of its subscales and their relation to the key protective supports identified in resilience research. The ClassMaps strategy is a useful example of ‘giving psychology away’. Full article
Show Figures

Figure A1

11 pages, 457 KiB  
Article
Ethnic-Racial (Mis)Match between Mentors and Mentees on Perceived Strength of Relationship
by Jennifer Koide, Heather L. McDaniel and Michael D. Lyons
Educ. Sci. 2024, 14(4), 398; https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14040398 - 10 Apr 2024
Viewed by 632
Abstract
Mentoring programs are popular mechanisms for promoting positive youth development due to developmental research suggesting that youth with strong relationships with a special adult have a lower likelihood of a range of negative outcomes. Community-based mentoring programs are mechanisms for promoting access to [...] Read more.
Mentoring programs are popular mechanisms for promoting positive youth development due to developmental research suggesting that youth with strong relationships with a special adult have a lower likelihood of a range of negative outcomes. Community-based mentoring programs are mechanisms for promoting access to mental health support and positive youth outcomes. Youth mentorship programs reveal mixed and modest outcomes, yet youth outcomes are more robust for high-quality relationships. Ethnic-racial identity is hypothesized to affect the relationship quality because shared identities are thought to facilitate trust and empower youth to succeed. However, studies have found that ethnic-racial match does not affect the strength of the dyadic relationship. This study attempts to address these disparate findings by explicitly examining ethnic-racial matching and relationship quality at two-time points. We conducted a two-step hierarchical regression to determine whether ethnic-racial match affected mentee reports of the relationship at follow-up. The results show ethnic-racial match did not significantly predict positive dimensions of the relationship at follow-up. Moreover, same-ethnic-racial matches reported a lower rate of change and slightly less relationship dissatisfaction at time 2 compared to cross-ethnic-racial matches. Results contribute to existing literature showing mixed results in ethnic-racial matching in youth mentorship programs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop