Developing Ecosystem Services for Environmental Economics in Forestry

A special issue of Forests (ISSN 1999-4907). This special issue belongs to the section "Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 July 2023) | Viewed by 1497

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
Interests: ecosystem services; forest economics; program evaluation; international forestry; natural resources administration

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Forest ecosystem services (FESs) such as carbon sequestration, climate amelioration, soil building, biodiversity, water and pollution amelioration activities and others provide a multitude of social, economic and environmental benefits that are difficult to measure and oftentimes undervalued and taken for granted. FESs can be thought of as provisional (e.g., genetic diversity), regulating (e.g., erosion prevention), supporting (e.g., soil formation) or cultural (e.g., recreation/tourism), and have individual and additive impacts on our planet and the biota that inhabit it. Nature-based services such as these are becoming increasingly critical for the survival of our planet and for sustainable growth in a world with a population in excess of 8 billion people.  The valuation of FESs and their use in decision-making processes is imperative if we are to make appropriate decisions in today’s world. Forest and environmental economists are challenged with techniques and methods for measuring the values and impacts of these services, as well as their integration into policy and management decision-making realms. This Special Issue of Forests will concentrate on relevant theoretical perspectives in FESs as well as successful measurement and monitoring techniques and economic practices that lead to improved FES valuation. The Issue will also accept publications focused on practical applications and implementation of FES valuation in decision-making processes.

Dr. William G. Hubbard
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Forests is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • forest ecosystem services
  • economic evaluation
  • forest economics
  • environmental economics

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 8970 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Ecosystem Services Radiation Assessment of the National Ecological Sheltering Zone in China
by Kai Su and Xuebing Jiang
Forests 2023, 14(2), 246; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14020246 - 28 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1265
Abstract
Ecosystem services (ES) have been shrinking due to unreasonable development and utilization for a long time. There are many studies on ES, but the ecological information for policymakers is still complex and obscure. To address this critical omission, based on remote sensing data, [...] Read more.
Ecosystem services (ES) have been shrinking due to unreasonable development and utilization for a long time. There are many studies on ES, but the ecological information for policymakers is still complex and obscure. To address this critical omission, based on remote sensing data, combined with meteorological data, land use data, and administrative division data, using GIS spatial analysis technology and some ecological process models, we develop an ecosystem services radiation assessment framework (ESRAF) that can provide policymakers with concise and reliable ecological information. We illustrate the measurement of ESRAF through an application to specific regions of China’s national ecological sheltering zone (NESZ), showing that the approach can effectively identify the beneficiary areas (SBA) for sand-stabilization service, soil conservation service, and water conservation service, and the degree of sharing of ES of SBA. ES produced by ecosystems in a specific region not only generates huge benefits locally but also a large number of ES benefit surrounding regions through cross-regional transmission. Specifically, in 2015, the area benefiting from sand-stabilization service provided by the Ordos’s ecosystem is about 1.66×106 km2, the amount of dust reduction in SBA would reduce by 28,738.67×104 tons. The Loess Plateau Ecological Screen (LPES) provides critical soil conservation service, the SBA of LPES includes two parts: LPES and the Yellow River. The Northeast Forest Belt (NFB) provides vital water conservation services. The water conservation service beneficiary area is mainly located near the NFB, with 266 hydrological response units, covering an area of 8.982×104 km2. This study also showed that the transmission distance is inversely proportional to the radiation effect, that is, the benefit level decreases with the distance from SPA. According to the degree of sharing of ES of SBA, the proposed cross-regional differentiated ecological compensation scheme is helpful to promote regional sustainable development. At the same time, this study also shows that NESZ is of great significance for ensuring China’s ecological security. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Developing Ecosystem Services for Environmental Economics in Forestry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop