The Role of Physical Exercise in the Prevention and Treatment of Diseases

A special issue of Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 25 March 2025 | Viewed by 2496

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
Interests: sports medicine; strength and conditioning; concurrent training; health
*
E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Sport Sciences, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal
Interests: resistance training; strength and conditioning; movement velocity; training load; physical performance; geriatrics
* Invited Auxiliary Professor

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Regular physical exercise is essential to improve or maintain physical and mental health and prevent diseases. In addition, it can potentially mitigate and reverse some of the adverse effects caused by several diseases, such as fatigue. Based on these premises, this Special Issue aims to broaden the scientific understanding of the role of physical exercise in preventing and treating several diseases in people of different ages. Therefore, we invite authors to submit original articles and reviews on the effects of exercise interventions (e.g., resistance training, endurance training, concurrent training, and multicomponent training) on a comprehensive range of diseases, which may include cerebrovascular diseases, cardiovascular diseases, pulmonary diseases, metabolic diseases, musculoskeletal diseases, neurological diseases, psychiatric diseases, and oncological diseases. Authors are also encouraged to submit case studies reporting the impact of exercise on the mitigation or treatment of a specific disease or symptom.

We look forward to receiving your contributions.

Prof. Dr. Henrique P. Neiva
Prof. Dr. Ana Sofia Ruivo Alves
Dr. Diogo L. Marques
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Healthcare is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • exercise
  • stroke
  • hypertension
  • pulmonary disease
  • diabetes
  • low back pain
  • dementia
  • depression
  • fibromyalgia
  • cancer

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

11 pages, 210 KiB  
Article
Efficacy of Daily Walking as a Potential Predictor of Improved Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Korea
by Wonil Park and Dongjun Lee
Healthcare 2024, 12(16), 1644; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161644 - 18 Aug 2024
Viewed by 591
Abstract
This study examines whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores differ due to the frequency of walking or physical activity (PA) throughout a week in diabetic patients in Korea. This population-based cross-sectional study used data from the 2018–2021 Korea National Health and Nutrition [...] Read more.
This study examines whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores differ due to the frequency of walking or physical activity (PA) throughout a week in diabetic patients in Korea. This population-based cross-sectional study used data from the 2018–2021 Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. The dependent variable was HRQoL scores as measured with EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). The independent variables were defined as three types of PA: (1) walking; (2) moderate; and (3) vigorous. An estimated population size of 2,376,066 was included in this study. The mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) age of patients was 60.12 years (59.23, 60.81), and 53.0% were female. The mean (95% CI) of EQ-5D was 0.867 (0.857, 0.877). The majority of diabetic patients reported walking daily (39.05%, 95% CI; 36.28–41.81%), while a significant proportion did not engage in moderate (65.45%, 95% CI; 62.79–68.11%) or vigorous (78.38%, 95% CI; 73.02–77.73%) PA at all. After controlling for covariates, EQ-5D scores significantly increased when patients had walked once per week for at least 10 min in the Tobit regression model. The frequency of walking was the most significant predicting factor for better HRQoL in patients with type 2 diabetes. Full article

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

23 pages, 1179 KiB  
Review
Assessing Functional Ankle Instability in Sport: A Critical Review and Bibliometric Analysis
by Élio Alexandre, Diogo Monteiro, Ricardo SottoMayor, Miguel Jacinto, Fernanda M. Silva, Luis Cid and Pedro Duarte-Mendes
Healthcare 2024, 12(17), 1733; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171733 - 30 Aug 2024
Viewed by 889
Abstract
Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) is the subject of extensive research in sports and other environments. Given the importance of accurately measuring this latent construct, it is imperative to carry out a careful assessment of the available tools. In this context, the aim of [...] Read more.
Functional Ankle Instability (FAI) is the subject of extensive research in sports and other environments. Given the importance of accurately measuring this latent construct, it is imperative to carry out a careful assessment of the available tools. In this context, the aim of this review was to take an in-depth look at the six most cited measurement tools to assess FAI, with a specific focus on patient-reported outcome measures related to ankle and foot. Four electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed, and SportDiscus) were searched (up to November 2022) to identify the six most cited questionnaires for assessing FAI. Our analysis showed that the most cited questionnaires are the following: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), the Foot Function Index (FFI), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), the Olerud and Molander Ankle Score (OMAS), and the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Each questionnaire was thoroughly assessed and discussed in three sections: Development, Reliability, and Summaries. In addition, bibliometric data were calculated to analyze the relevance of each questionnaire. Despite variations in terms of validity and reliability, conceptualization, structure, and usefulness, the six questionnaires proved to be robust from a psychometric point of view, being widely supported in the literature. The bibliometric analyses suggested that the FAOS ranks first and the FFI ranks sixth in the weighted average of the impact factors of their original publications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

15 pages, 660 KiB  
Systematic Review
Objectively Measured Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour on Cardiovascular Risk and Health-Related Quality of Life in Adults: A Systematic Review
by Beatriz Santos, Diogo Monteiro, Fernanda M. Silva, Gonçalo Flores, Teresa Bento and Pedro Duarte-Mendes
Healthcare 2024, 12(18), 1866; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12181866 - 16 Sep 2024
Viewed by 452
Abstract
Background: This systematic review analysed the association between objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular risk and HRQoL in adults without previous CVD. Additionally, we analysed the impact of the intensity of the physical activity in this association. Methods: The search [...] Read more.
Background: This systematic review analysed the association between objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour with cardiovascular risk and HRQoL in adults without previous CVD. Additionally, we analysed the impact of the intensity of the physical activity in this association. Methods: The search was carried out in three electronic databases with access until February 2023 to find studies with an observational design. For quality assessment, we used The National Institute of Health (NIH) Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. Results: We identified 5819 references, but only five studies were included. One study shows a positive association between physical activity and HRQoL, while sedentary behaviour was negatively related to HRQoL. Another study showed an association between high-intensity physical activity with a better physical component of HRQoL and low-intensity physical activity with a better mental component of HRQoL. Three studies concluded that higher levels of physical activity are associated with lower levels of cardiovascular risk and higher levels of sedentary behaviour are associated with higher levels of cardiovascular risk. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that people who spend more time being active and spend less time being sedentary appear to have lower cardiovascular risk and higher HRQoL. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop