ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Realizing Human Rights and Equity in Mental Health

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Mental Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2022) | Viewed by 3242

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Health Policy & Management, York University, 4700 Keele St., Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
Interests: critical health policy; mental health reform; service provision; intersectional approaches in mental health; health and social and structural inequities

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change, York University; 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, ON, Canada
MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Interests: social and health inequities; racism and mental health; migration and mental health; work and mental health; community-based research; health system transformation; global health; implementation science

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Canadian Centre on Disability Studies Inc. o/a Eviance: Community-based knowledge hub on cross-disability issues, 330 St. Mary Avenue, Suite 300, Winnipeg, R3C 3Z5, Canada
Interests: mental health and disability policy and practice; social innovations informed by intersectionality, human rights, and reflexivity; trauma and social determinants of health; leadership in transformative system change

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues

Evidence abounds of the stigma, discrimination, and human rights violations that people who need and/or access mental health care experience, and yet the system response to this evidence has been poorly supported and conceived. Rights violations and coercive practices in mental health are mediated through day-to-day stigmatizing attitudes and discriminatory behaviours and through the use of domestic mental health laws. Indeed, many countries’ mental health laws have been found to be in direct contravention of international human rights covenants. These practices exist despite the move towards recovery and human rights-oriented paradigms in mental health that are pushing for system change. Internationally, non-governmental and disability person’s organizations (DPOs) that are user–survivor led play a key advocacy role in mental health and some excellent models for recovery-oriented, non-coercive, community-based mental health care exist. The aim of this Special Issue is to showcase research, activism, policy, and practice that gives primacy to people’s lived experiences of coercion and the ways that these experiences are shaped by social and structural factors such as sexism, colonialism, racism, sanism, and poverty. Research and practice that employs intersectional approaches within the mental health sector and demonstrates the transformative power of coalition building across sectors to enhance critical mass to resist coercive practices and foster innovation in mental health and well-being will be highlighted. Papers that align with the UN’s Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD)’s human rights framework and the WHO’s mental health Quality Rights Initiative and that respect the dignity of people experiencing emotional distress will be featured.

Dr. Marina Morrow
Dr. Susan L. Hardie
Dr. Farah Mawani
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • mental health
  • human rights
  • equity
  • colonialism
  • psychiatry
  • discrimination
  • coercive practices
  • racism
  • sexism
  • poverty
  • citizenship
  • intersectionality.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 339 KiB  
Article
From Substitute to Supported Decision Making: Practitioner, Community and Service-User Perspectives on Privileging Will and Preferences in Mental Health Care
by Sarah Gordon, Tracey Gardiner, Kris Gledhill, Armon Tamatea and Giles Newton-Howes
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(10), 6002; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106002 - 15 May 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1729
Abstract
Compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) requires substitute decision making being abolished and replaced with supported decision making. The current exploratory study involved a series of hui (meetings) with subject matter experts across the spectrum of the [...] Read more.
Compliance with the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD) requires substitute decision making being abolished and replaced with supported decision making. The current exploratory study involved a series of hui (meetings) with subject matter experts across the spectrum of the mental health care system to identify interventions facilitative of supported decision making; and the prioritisation of those in accordance with their own perspectives. A mixed-methods approach was used to categorise, describe and rank the data. Categories of intervention identified included proactive pre-event planning/post-event debriefing, enabling options and choices, information provision, facilitating conditions and support to make a decision, and education. The category of facilitating conditions and support to make a decision was prioritised by the majority of stakeholders; however, people from Māori, Pasifika, and LGBTQIA+ perspectives, who disproportionally experience inequities and discrimination, prioritised the categories of proactive post-event debriefing/pre-event planning and/or information provision. Similar attributes across categories of intervention detailed the importance of easily and variably accessible options and choices and how these could best be supported in terms of people, place, time, material resources, regular reviews and reflection. Implications of these findings, particularly in terms of the operationalisation of supported decision making in practice, are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Realizing Human Rights and Equity in Mental Health)
Back to TopTop