Recent Advances in Neurorehabilitation: Emerging Techniques and Technologies

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Clinical Neurology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 28 February 2025 | Viewed by 1191

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Neurorehabilitation has evolved significantly from its early foundations, incorporating compensatory strategies for lost functions, to incorporate a wide-range of emerging technologies aimed at functional recovery. This Special Issue is centered around the most recent advances in this dynamic field, aiming to highlight innovative research that extends the frontiers of neurorehabilitation through new techniques and technologies. We are particularly interested in contributions that explore cutting-edge developments such as neuroimaging analysis methods, cognitive rehabilitation, robotic aids, virtual reality, advanced neuroprosthetics, and novel pharmacological approaches. The scope of this Special Issue extends to experimental studies, comprehensive reviews, and case studies that provide not only state-of-the-art interventions but also insight into their practical applications and effectiveness. We invite submissions from researchers whose work promises to shape the future of neurorehabilitation, offering new hope and improved outcomes for patients worldwide.

You may choose our Joint Special Issue in Brain Sciences.

Dr. Serena Dattola
Dr. Lilla Bonanno
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • neurorehabilitation
  • neuroimaging
  • robotic rehabilitation
  • virtual reality therapy
  • neuroprosthetics
  • brain–computer interfaces
  • pharmacological interventions
  • functional recovery
  • neuroplasticity
  • cognitive rehabilitation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 2086 KiB  
Article
Effects of Robotic Postural Stand Training with Epidural Stimulation on Sitting Postural Control in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: A Pilot Study
by Enrico Rejc, Simone Zaccaron, Collin Bowersock, Tanvi Pisolkar, Beatrice Ugiliweneza, Gail F. Forrest, Sunil Agrawal, Susan J. Harkema and Claudia A. Angeli
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(15), 4309; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154309 - 24 Jul 2024
Viewed by 847
Abstract
(1) Background. High-level spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts trunk control, leading to an impaired performance of upright postural tasks in sitting and standing. We previously showed that a novel robotic postural stand training with spinal cord epidural stimulation targeted at facilitating standing [...] Read more.
(1) Background. High-level spinal cord injury (SCI) disrupts trunk control, leading to an impaired performance of upright postural tasks in sitting and standing. We previously showed that a novel robotic postural stand training with spinal cord epidural stimulation targeted at facilitating standing (Stand-scES) largely improved standing trunk control in individuals with high-level motor complete SCI. Here, we aimed at assessing the effects of robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES on sitting postural control in the same population. (2) Methods. Individuals with cervical (n = 5) or high-thoracic (n = 1) motor complete SCI underwent approximately 80 sessions (1 h/day; 5 days/week) of robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES, which was performed with free hands (i.e., without using handlebars) and included periods of standing with steady trunk control, self-initiated trunk and arm movements, and trunk perturbations. Sitting postural control was assessed on a standard therapy mat, with and without scES targeted at facilitating sitting (Sit-scES), before and after robotic postural stand training. Independent sit time and trunk center of mass (CM) displacement were assessed during a 5 min time window to evaluate steady sitting control. Self-initiated antero-posterior and medial-lateral trunk movements were also attempted from a sitting position, with the goal of covering the largest distance in the respective cardinal directions. Finally, the four Neuromuscular Recovery Scale items focused on sitting trunk control (Sit, Sit-up, Trunk extension in sitting, Reverse sit-up) were assessed. (3) Results. In summary, neither statistically significant differences nor large Effect Size were promoted by robotic postural stand training for the sitting outcomes considered for analysis. (4) Conclusions. The findings of the present study, together with previous observations, may suggest that robotic postural stand training with Stand-scES promoted trunk motor learning that was posture- and/or task-specific and, by itself, was not sufficient to significantly impact sitting postural control. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop