Pulmonary Hypertension: Pathophysiology, Innovative Exploration and Therapies

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Pulmonology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 May 2023) | Viewed by 10815

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary Diseases, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: pulmonary hypertension; haemodynamics; non-invasive diagnostic approach; exercise physiology; sleep medicine

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
Interests: pulmonary hypertension; translational medicine; novel diagnostic technologies; tuberculosis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a haemodynamic condition defined by a pulmonary artery mean pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg measured at rest during right heart catheterisation. It is the consequence of various causes divided into five etiological groups. Group 1 is a category of rare pulmonary arterial diseases called pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Despite the encouraging therapeutic options targeting different pathophysiological pathways, PAH is still associated with a poor outcome and may lead to lung transplantation. PH also frequently complicates chronic heart (group 2) or lung (group 3) diseases where it is a predictor of mortality. Chronic thromboembolic PH belongs to group 4. In this group, patients may benefit from various therapeutic strategies such as pulmonary endarterectomy or balloon pulmonary angioplasty. Group 5 includes PH of unknown or multifactorial mechanisms.

The variety of PH aetiologies can therefore produce a real diagnostic and therapeutic challenge for patients addressed in pulmonary vascular expert centres. The accuracy of the diagnosis requires comprehensive work-up and insight into the implicated pathobiological and pathophysiological mechanisms. It also requires precise and reliable diagnostic tools.

The aim of this Special Issue is to provide the Journal of Clinical Medicine readers with original publications allowing better knowledge of PH pathophysiology and to discuss innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.

All papers submitted to this Special Issue are reviewed by independent referees, and the final decision is made by a JCM Editorial Board Member who does not have any conflicts of interest with the submission.

Dr. Frédéric Lador
Dr. Benoit Lechartier
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pulmonary hypertension
  • pathophysiological pathways
  • haemodynamics
  • therapeutic innovations
  • diagnostic tool development

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

11 pages, 1303 KiB  
Article
The First Pulmonary Hypertension Registry in the United Arab Emirates (UAEPH): Clinical Characteristics, Hemodynamic Parameters with Focus on Treatment and Outcomes for Patients with Group 1-PH
by Khaled Saleh, Naureen Khan, Kelly Dougherty, Govinda Bodi, Miriam Michalickova, Samiuddin Mohammed, Theodora Kerenidi, Ziad Sadik, Jihad Mallat, Samar Farha and Hani Sabbour
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 1996; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051996 - 2 Mar 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1760
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study is to present the first United Arab Emirates pulmonary hypertension registry of patients’ clinical characteristics, hemodynamic parameters and treatment outcomes. Method: This is a retrospective study describing all the adult patients who underwent a right heart catheterization [...] Read more.
Background: The aim of this study is to present the first United Arab Emirates pulmonary hypertension registry of patients’ clinical characteristics, hemodynamic parameters and treatment outcomes. Method: This is a retrospective study describing all the adult patients who underwent a right heart catheterization for evaluation of pulmonary hypertension (PH) between January 2015 and December 2021 in a tertiary referral center in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Results: A total of 164 consecutive patients were diagnosed with PH during the five years of the study. Eighty-three patients (50.6%) were World Symposium PH Group 1-PH; nineteen patients (11.6%) were Group 2-PH due to left heart disease; twenty-three patients (14.0%) were Group 3-PH due to chronic lung disease; thirty-four patients (20.7%) were Group 4-PH due to chronic thromboembolic lung disease, and five patients (3.0%) were Group 5-PH. Among Group 1-PH, twenty-five (30%) had idiopathic, twenty-seven (33%) had connective tissue disease, twenty-six (31%) had congenital heart disease, and five patients (6%) had porto-pulmonary hypertension. The median follow-up was 55.6 months. Most of the patients were started on dual then sequentially escalated to triple combination therapy. The 1-, 3- and 5-year cumulative probabilities of survival for Group 1-PH were 86% (95% CI, 75–92%), 69% (95% CI, 54–80%) and 69% (95% CI, 54–80%). Conclusions: This is the first registry of Group 1-PH from a single tertiary referral center in the UAE. Our cohort was younger with a higher percentage of patients with congenital heart disease compared to cohorts from Western countries but similar to registries from other Asian countries. Mortality is comparable to other major registries. Adopting the new guideline recommendations and improving the availability and adherence to medications are likely to play a significant role in improving outcomes in the future. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1748 KiB  
Article
The Influence of Methods for Cardiac Output Determination on the Diagnosis of Precapillary Pulmonary Hypertension: A Mathematical Model
by Léon Genecand, Gaëtan Simian, Roberto Desponds, Julie Wacker, Silvia Ulrich, Benoit Lechartier, Jean-Marc Fellrath, Olivier Sitbon, Maurice Beghetti and Frédéric Lador
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(2), 410; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12020410 - 4 Jan 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1400
Abstract
Background: precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH, PcPH) is now defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mmHg and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 2 WU. For PVR calculation, the measurement of [...] Read more.
Background: precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH, PcPH) is now defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) > 20 mmHg, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) ≤ 15 mmHg and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) > 2 WU. For PVR calculation, the measurement of cardiac output (CO) is necessary. It is generally measured using thermodilution. However, recent data showed that the agreement with direct Fick method, historically the gold standard, is less than previously reported. We aimed to create a mathematical model that calculated the probability of being classified differently (PcPH or unclassified PH) if CO measured by direct Fick was used instead of thermodilution for any individual patients with a mPAP > 20 mmHg and a PAWP ≤ 15 mmHg. Methods: The model is based on Bland and Altman analysis with a normally distributed difference of cardiac output, fixed 1.96 standard deviation of bias, bias and physiological cardiac output limits. Results: Following a literature review of the studies comparing CO measured with direct Fick and thermodilution, we fixed the 1.96 standard deviation of bias at 2 L/min, bias at 0 L/min and physiological resting CO limits between 1.3 L/min and 10.2 L/min. Conclusions: This model can help the clinician to evaluate the potential benefit of measuring CO using direct Fick during the diagnostic work-up and its utility in confirming or ruling out a diagnosis of PcPH in any given patient with a mPAP > 20 mmHg and a PAWP ≤ 15 mmHg. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1446 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Implications of the Novel Pulmonary Hypertension Definition in Patients with Aortic Stenosis after Transcatheter Valve Replacement
by Dionysios Adamopoulos, Stamatia Pagoulatou, Georgios Rovas, Vasiliki Bikia, Hajo Müller, Georgios Giannakopoulos, Sarah Mauler-Wittwer, Marc-Joseph Licker, Nikolaos Stergiopulos, Frédéric Lador and Stéphane Noble
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(15), 4279; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11154279 - 22 Jul 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1636
Abstract
Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH), traditionally defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) ≥ 25 mmHg, is associated with poor outcomes in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Recently, a novel definition for PH has [...] Read more.
Introduction: Pulmonary hypertension (PH), traditionally defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) ≥ 25 mmHg, is associated with poor outcomes in patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for severe aortic stenosis (AS). Recently, a novel definition for PH has been proposed, placing the cut-off value of mean PAP at 20 mmHg, and introducing pulmonary vascular resistance as an exclusive indicator for the pre-capillary involvement. In light of the novel criteria, whether PH still preserves its prognostic significance remains unknown. Methods: The study population consisted of 380 patients with AS, who underwent a right heart catheterization before TAVR. The cohort was divided according to the presence of PH (n = 174, 45.7%) or not. Patients with PH were further divided into the following groups: (1) Pre-capillary PH ((Pre-capPH), n = 46, 12.1%); (2) Isolated post-capillary PH ((IpcPH), n = 78, 20.5%); (3) Combined pre and post-capillary PH ((CpcPH), n = 82, 21.6%). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 1 year. Results: A total of 246 patients (64.7%) exhibited mean PAP > 20 mmHg. Overall, the presence of PH was associated with higher 1-year mortality rates (hazard ratio (HR) 2.8, 95% CI: 1.4–5.8, p = 0.004). Compared to patients with no PH, Pre-capPH and CpcPH (but not IpcPH) were related to higher 1-year mortality (HR 2.7, 95% CI: 1.0–7.2, p = 0.041 and HR 3.9, 95% CI: 1.8–8.5, p = 0.001, respectively). This remained significant even after the adjustment for baseline comorbidities. Conclusions: Pre-interventional PH according to the novel hemodynamic criteria, is linked with poor outcomes in patients undergoing TAVR for severe AS. However, this is mainly driven by patients with mean PAP ≥ 25 mmHg. Patients with a pre-capillary PH component as defined by increased PVR present an even worse prognosis as compared to patients with isolated post-capillary or no PH who present comparable 1-year mortality rates. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1675 KiB  
Article
Cardiorespiratory Adaptation to Short-Term Exposure to Altitude vs. Normobaric Hypoxia in Patients with Pulmonary Hypertension
by Simon R. Schneider, Mona Lichtblau, Michael Furian, Laura C. Mayer, Charlotte Berlier, Julian Müller, Stéphanie Saxer, Esther I. Schwarz, Konrad E. Bloch and Silvia Ulrich
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2769; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102769 - 14 May 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2315
Abstract
Prediction of adverse health effects at altitude or during air travel is relevant, particularly in pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease such as pulmonary arterial or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PAH/CTEPH, PH). A total of 21 stable PH-patients (64 ± 15 y, 10 female, 12/9 PAH/CTEPH) [...] Read more.
Prediction of adverse health effects at altitude or during air travel is relevant, particularly in pre-existing cardiopulmonary disease such as pulmonary arterial or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (PAH/CTEPH, PH). A total of 21 stable PH-patients (64 ± 15 y, 10 female, 12/9 PAH/CTEPH) were examined by pulse oximetry, arterial blood gas analysis and echocardiography during exposure to normobaric hypoxia (NH) (FiO2 15% ≈ 2500 m simulated altitude, data partly published) at low altitude and, on a separate day, at hypobaric hypoxia (HH, 2500 m) within 20–30 min after arrival. We compared changes in blood oxygenation and estimated pulmonary artery pressure in lowlanders with PH during high altitude simulation testing (HAST, NH) with changes in response to HH. During NH, 4/21 desaturated to SpO2 < 85% corresponding to a positive HAST according to BTS-recommendations and 12 qualified for oxygen at altitude according to low SpO2 < 92% at baseline. At HH, 3/21 received oxygen due to safety criteria (SpO2 < 80% for >30 min), of which two were HAST-negative. During HH vs. NH, patients had a (mean ± SE) significantly lower PaCO2 4.4 ± 0.1 vs. 4.9 ± 0.1 kPa, mean difference (95% CI) −0.5 kPa (−0.7 to −0.3), PaO2 6.7 ± 0.2 vs. 8.1 ± 0.2 kPa, −1.3 kPa (−1.9 to −0.8) and higher tricuspid regurgitation pressure gradient 55 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 4 mmHg, 10 mmHg (3 to 17), all p < 0.05. No serious adverse events occurred. In patients with PH, short-term exposure to altitude of 2500 m induced more pronounced hypoxemia, hypocapnia and pulmonary hemodynamic changes compared to NH during HAST despite similar exposure times and PiO2. Therefore, the use of HAST to predict physiological changes at altitude remains questionable. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03592927 and NCT03637153). Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4610 KiB  
Article
Non-Invasive Cardiac Output Determination Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Thermodilution in Pulmonary Hypertension
by Lindsey A. Crowe, Léon Genecand, Anne-Lise Hachulla, Stéphane Noble, Maurice Beghetti, Jean-Paul Vallée and Frédéric Lador
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2717; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102717 - 11 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1602
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to measure cardiac output (CO) non-invasively, which is a paramount parameter in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. We retrospectively compared stroke volume (SV) obtained with MRI (SVMRI) in six localisations against SV measured with thermodilution [...] Read more.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to measure cardiac output (CO) non-invasively, which is a paramount parameter in pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients. We retrospectively compared stroke volume (SV) obtained with MRI (SVMRI) in six localisations against SV measured with thermodilution (TD) (SVTD) and against each other in 24 patients evaluated in our PH centre using Bland and Altman (BA) agreement analyses, linear correlation, and intraclass correlation (ICC). None of the six tested localisations for SVMRI reached the predetermined criteria for interchangeability with SVTD, with two standard deviations (2SD) of bias between 24.1 mL/beat and 31.1 mL/beat. The SVMRI methods yielded better agreement when compared against each other than the comparison between SVMRI and SVTD, with the best 2SD of bias being 13.8 mL/beat. The inter-observer and intra-observer ICCs for COMRI were excellent (inter-observer ICC between 0.889 and 0.983 and intra-observer ICC between 0.991 and 0.999). We could not confirm the interchangeability of SVMRI with SVTD based on the predetermined interchangeability criteria. The lack of agreement between MRI and TD might be explained because TD is less precise than previously thought. We evaluated a new method to estimate CO through the pulmonary circulation (COp) in PH patients that may be more precise than the previously tested methods. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

21 pages, 1555 KiB  
Review
Pressure Overload and Right Ventricular Failure: From Pathophysiology to Treatment
by Nicolas Dayer, Zied Ltaief, Lucas Liaudet, Benoit Lechartier, John-David Aubert and Patrick Yerly
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(14), 4722; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12144722 - 17 Jul 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3890
Abstract
Right ventricular failure (RVF) is often caused by increased afterload and disrupted coupling between the right ventricle (RV) and the pulmonary arteries (PAs). After a phase of adaptive hypertrophy, pressure-overloaded RVs evolve towards maladaptive hypertrophy and finally ventricular dilatation, with reduced stroke volume [...] Read more.
Right ventricular failure (RVF) is often caused by increased afterload and disrupted coupling between the right ventricle (RV) and the pulmonary arteries (PAs). After a phase of adaptive hypertrophy, pressure-overloaded RVs evolve towards maladaptive hypertrophy and finally ventricular dilatation, with reduced stroke volume and systemic congestion. In this article, we review the concept of RV-PA coupling, which depicts the interaction between RV contractility and afterload, as well as the invasive and non-invasive techniques for its assessment. The current principles of RVF management based on pathophysiology and underlying etiology are subsequently discussed. Treatment strategies remain a challenge and range from fluid management and afterload reduction in moderate RVF to vasopressor therapy, inotropic support and, occasionally, mechanical circulatory support in severe RVF. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 335 KiB  
Review
Risk Stratification in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Update and Perspectives
by Argyro Vraka, Eleni Diamanti, Mithum Kularatne, Patrick Yerly, Frédéric Lador, John-David Aubert and Benoit Lechartier
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4349; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134349 - 28 Jun 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2764
Abstract
Risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is crucial in assessing patient prognosis. It serves a prominent role in everyday patient care and can be determined using several validated risk assessment scores worldwide. The recently published 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory [...] Read more.
Risk stratification in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is crucial in assessing patient prognosis. It serves a prominent role in everyday patient care and can be determined using several validated risk assessment scores worldwide. The recently published 2022 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Respiratory Society (ERS) guidelines underline the importance of risk stratification not only at baseline but also during follow-up. Achieving a low-risk status has now become the therapeutic goal, emphasising the importance of personalised therapy. The application of these guidelines is also important in determining the timing for lung transplantation referral. In this review, we summarise the most relevant prognostic factors of PAH as well as the parameters used in PAH risk scores and their evolution in the guidelines over the last decade. Finally, we describe the central role that risk stratification plays in the current guidelines not only in European countries but also in Asian countries. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

9 pages, 594 KiB  
Brief Report
Compression Stockings Improve Lower Legs Symptom in Patients with Pulmonary Artery Hypertension Treated by Pulmonary Vasodilators—A Pilot Study
by Naoko Nakashima, Nobuhiro Tahara, Yoichi Sugiyama, Munehisa Bekki, Shoko Maeda-Ogata, Akihiro Honda, Chidu Goto, Setsuko Tanaka and Yoshihiro Fukumoto
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(7), 2484; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12072484 - 24 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1092
Abstract
Pulmonary vasodilators have improved pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and prognosis; however, the drugs cause some side effects, including lower legs pain, which impair quality of life (QOL). The present study examined if compression stockings improved lower extremity symptoms and QOL caused by [...] Read more.
Pulmonary vasodilators have improved pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) symptoms and prognosis; however, the drugs cause some side effects, including lower legs pain, which impair quality of life (QOL). The present study examined if compression stockings improved lower extremity symptoms and QOL caused by pulmonary vasodilators in PAH patients. We retrospectively enrolled consecutively ten patients with PAH treated by pulmonary vasodilators, who were regularly followed in Kurume University Hospital from January 2022 to June 2022. Oral questionnaire surveys, the Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS) and the Pain Disability Assessment Scale (PDAS), were conducted regarding lower extremity symptoms before wearing elastic stockings and one month later, to evaluate how the lower extremity symptoms affected daily life. All ten patients were female, with a mean age of 50.2 ± 11.5 years, out of whom intravenous prostacyclin analogue (PGI2) was administered in five patients. In no intravenous PGI2 group, NRS score was significantly improved from 4.6 ± 2.3 to 2.8 ± 1.2 (p = 0.037), while from 9.4 ± 1.2 to 5.4 ± 1.6 (p = 0.002) in intravenous PGI2 group. PDAS score was also significantly improved [no intravenous PGI2 group; 18.0 (15.0–24.0) to 15.0 (10.0–19.0), intravenous PGI2 group; 25.0 (17.0–37.0) to 17.0 (5.0–27.0)]. Lower extremity symptoms in patients using pulmonary vasodilators were improved by wearing compression stockings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop