jcm-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Impaired Bone Healing: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Orthopedics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2022) | Viewed by 8513

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Academic Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Interests: non-union; fracture; bone healing; basic sciences; arthroplasty; hip replacement; knee replacement

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Academic Department of Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Interests: pelvic instability; pelvic reconstruction; non-union; bone regeneration; post fracture fixation complications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Bone healing is a complex but well-orchestrated physiological process which recapitulates aspects of the embryonic skeletal development in combination with the normal response to acute tissue injury. It encompasses multiple biological phenomena and is margined by the combination of osteoconduction (extracellular matrix formation); osteoinduction (timed cellular recruitment, proliferation and differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) into osteoblasts and chondroblasts, controlled by multiple signaling molecules); and osteogenesis (new bone formation). In contrast to scar formation, which occurs in the majority of other tissue types in adults, bone has the innate capability to repair and regenerate, regaining its former biomechanical and biochemical properties.

Despite advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms of fracture healing, the incidence of non-union remains largely unchanged over the years and has been estimated at between 5% and 10%, representing a major social and financial burden in every healthcare system. It is generally accepted that the progression to a non-union in most cases represents a multifactorial process. Various risk factors have been implicated in compromised fracture healing, generally divided into two main categories: patient-dependent and patient-independent factors. In the majority of cases no obvious cause can be found, while an important factor that is often underestimated is the body’s ability to heal a fracture. This may involve insufficiency/dysfunction of the cellular components (osteoprogenitor cells), molecular elements (osteoinductive molecules and other mediators), angiogenesis, extracellular matrix, and local immunoregulation.

A large number of different strategies have been proposed in the literature for managing non-unions. These commonly aim to enhance the local and/or systemic biological environments, along with optimization of the mechanical stability and local vascularity.

In this Special Issue we invite studies focusing on the etiology and management of non-unions, both in the clinical and laboratory context. We particularly invite manuscripts identifying specific risk factors contributing to the development of non-unions and treatment strategies for their prevention/treatment.

Dr. Michalis Panteli
Prof. Dr. Peter V. Giannoudis
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • non-union
  • fracture related infection
  • avascular necrosis
  • tissue engineering
  • 3D bioprinting

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 2469 KiB  
Article
Risk Factors for Non-Union after Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Patients with Distal Humerus Fractures
by Ki-Hyeok Ku, Jong-Hun Baek and Myung-Seo Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(10), 2679; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11102679 - 10 May 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4272
Abstract
Background: Only a few studies have reported on the risk factors for non-union after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in distal humerus fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 155 patients who underwent ORIF for distal humerus fractures from January 2008 to June 2020. [...] Read more.
Background: Only a few studies have reported on the risk factors for non-union after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in distal humerus fractures. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 155 patients who underwent ORIF for distal humerus fractures from January 2008 to June 2020. Various patient factors, including body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus (DM), and combined fracture, as well as surgical factors, including fixation methods (e.g., orthogonal plate/parallel plate/single plate/tension bend wiring [TBW]) and combined fracture operations, were evaluated as risk factors for non-unions. Results: Among the patient factors, BMI (25.0 ± 3.4 vs. 22.7 ± 3.4, p = 0.032), DM (5/13 [38.5%] vs. 20/142 [14.1%], p = 0.038) and combined fracture (5/13 [38.5%] vs. 16/142 [11.3%], p = 0.018) were significantly different between groups with non-union and union. Among the surgical factors, combined fracture operation (5 [38.5%] vs. 9 [6.3%], p = 0.002) and the fixation method (3 [23.1%]/1 [7.7%]/4 [30.8%]/5 [38.5%] vs. 84 [59.2%]/7 [4.9%]/40 [28.2%]/11 [7.7%], p = 0.005) showed a significant difference between groups with non-union and union. Multivariate regression analysis showed that combined fracture operation (OR 10.467; 95% CI 1.880–58.257; p = 0.007) and TBW (OR 9.176; 95% CI 1.474–57.135; p = 0.018) among the fixation methods posed as a significant risk factor for non-union. Conclusions: The risk of non-union increased in patients who underwent surgery for another fracture combined with distal humerus fracture and in patients who underwent ORIF with TBW. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impaired Bone Healing: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2175 KiB  
Article
Safe and Effective Treatment of Compromised Clavicle Fracture of the Medial and Lateral Third Using Focused Shockwaves
by Rainer Mittermayr, Nicolas Haffner, Sebastian Eder, Jonas Flatscher, Wolfgang Schaden, Paul Slezak and Cyrill Slezak
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(7), 1988; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071988 - 2 Apr 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2855
Abstract
A delay or failure to heal is the most common possible complication in clavicle fractures, especially in cases primarily treated conservatively. As the current standard therapy, surgical revision achieves good healing results, but is associated with potential surgery-related complications. Shockwave therapy as a [...] Read more.
A delay or failure to heal is the most common possible complication in clavicle fractures, especially in cases primarily treated conservatively. As the current standard therapy, surgical revision achieves good healing results, but is associated with potential surgery-related complications. Shockwave therapy as a non-invasive therapy shows similar reasonable consolidation rates in the non-union of different localizations, but avoids complications. Compromised clavicle fractures in the middle and lateral third treated with focused high-energy shockwave therapy were compared with those treated with surgical revision (ORIF). In addition, a three-dimensional computer simulation for evaluating the pressure distribution during shockwave application accompanied the clinical study. A comparable healing rate in bony consolidation was achieved in both groups. Significantly fewer complications, however, occurred in the shockwave group. The simulations showed safe application in this instance, particularly in avoiding lung tissue affection. When applied correctly, shockwaves represent a safe and promising therapy option for compromised clavicle fractures in the middle and lateral third. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impaired Bone Healing: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 707 KiB  
Article
Development and Validation of a Post-Operative Non-Union Risk Score for Subtrochanteric Femur Fractures
by Michalis Panteli, James S. H. Vun, Robert M. West, Anthony J. Howard, Ippokratis Pountos and Peter V. Giannoudis
J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10(23), 5632; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10235632 - 29 Nov 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2078
Abstract
Background: Our objective was to develop and validate a predictive model for non-union following a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Methods: Following institutional board approval, 316 consecutive patients presenting to our institution (84 non-unions) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were retrospectively identified. To [...] Read more.
Background: Our objective was to develop and validate a predictive model for non-union following a subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Methods: Following institutional board approval, 316 consecutive patients presenting to our institution (84 non-unions) who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were retrospectively identified. To identify potential unadjusted associations with progression to non-union, simple logistic regression models were used, followed by a revised adjusted model of multiple logistic regression. Results: Having established the risk factors for non-union, the coefficients were used to produce a risk score for predicting non-union. To identify the high-risk patients in the early post-operative period, self-dynamisation was excluded. The revised scoring system was the sum of the following: diabetes (6); deep wound infection (35); simple or severe comminution (13); presence of an atypical fracture (14); lateral cortex gap size ≥5 mm (11), varus malreduction (5–10 degrees) (9); varus malreduction (>10 degrees) (20). On the ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve, the area under the curve (0.790) demonstrated very good discriminatory capability of the scoring system, with good calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow test; p = 0.291). Moreover, 5-fold cross validation confirmed good fit of the model and internal validity (accuracy 0.806; Kappa 0.416). The cut-point determined by Youden’s formula was calculated as 18. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the risk of non-union can be reliably estimated in patients presenting with a subtrochanteric fracture, from the immediate post-operative period. The resulting non-union risk score can be used not only to identify the high-risk patients early, offering them appropriate consultation and in some cases surgical intervention, but also informs surgeons of the modifiable surgery related factors that contribute to this risk. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Impaired Bone Healing: Current Understanding and Future Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop