3D-Printed Biomaterials for Restorative Dentistry

A special issue of Journal of Functional Biomaterials (ISSN 2079-4983). This special issue belongs to the section "Dental Biomaterials".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (20 March 2024) | Viewed by 2501

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Interests: biomedical; dental materials; 3D printing technology; dental prosthseses; mechanical testing; implants; cad–cam; resin-based composites; restorative dentistry; dental traumatology; cariology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Substitutive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
Interests: polymers; dental ceramics; dental prostheses; dental implants; cad–cam; biomaterials; 3D printing

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Digital technology has been integrated into the dental field, providing many advantages and overcoming the drawbacks of conventional methods. Three-dimensional (3D) printing, or additive manufacturing (AM), is one of the technologies used to fabricate dental restorations with ease. It can be used to print different parts of fixed and removable prostheses, splints, surgical guides and radiographic templates.

Three-dimensional printing allows for the manufacturing of composite parts with complex geometries. Automated manufacturing eliminates the need for intensive labor work, but requires high skills of the operator. In addition, the process is less costly than other manufacturing methods due to the minimal raw material waste and simultaneous production of multiple parts.

The 3D printing of polymer composite materials has attracted special attention due to its promise in improving the properties of printed objects. During the early stages, 3D printing faced some difficulties that were overcome through new printing technologies and materials. Moreover, the widespread use of this technology and manufacturer competition have resulted in new versions of improved resins. Three-dimensional printing requires further investigations of factors affecting the properties of printed objects.

The aim of this Special Issue is to review the impact of 3D printing on restorative dentistry and fill the gap between in vitro studies and clinical applications of this technology. Additionally, it aims to introduce new composite materials used for restorative dental applications.

This Special Issue will focus on 3D-printed dental biomaterials, and their printing process and parameters, characterization and clinical applications. Papers are expected to discuss experimental approaches or clinical applications to highlight issues related to 3D printing, such as uses, properties and materials used in the dental field. In addition, papers may discuss ways of improvement and modifications.

Dr. Mohammed M. Gad
Dr. Reem Abualsaud
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Functional Biomaterials is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • 3D printing
  • polymer composites
  • additive manufacturing
  • dental prostheses
  • restorative dentistry
  • biomaterials
  • dental applications

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 2734 KiB  
Article
Crack Propagation and Fatigue Performance of Partial Posterior Indirect Restorations: An Extended Finite Element Method Study
by Mehmet Gökberkkaan Demirel, Reza Mohammadi and Murat Keçeci
J. Funct. Biomater. 2023, 14(9), 484; https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14090484 - 21 Sep 2023
Viewed by 1974
Abstract
Dental ceramics are susceptible to slow, progressive crack growth after cyclic loading. The purpose of this study was to investigate the progressive patterns of cracks in two different types of CAD/CAM ceramic materials used with three different partial posterior indirect restoration (PPIR) designs [...] Read more.
Dental ceramics are susceptible to slow, progressive crack growth after cyclic loading. The purpose of this study was to investigate the progressive patterns of cracks in two different types of CAD/CAM ceramic materials used with three different partial posterior indirect restoration (PPIR) designs and to determine the materials’ failure risk using a fatigue test. Standard initial cracks were formed in Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files prepared for three different PPIRs. The materials chosen were monolithic lithium disilicate (LS) and polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (PICNs). The extended finite element method (XFEM) was applied, and the fatigue performance was examined by applying a 600 N axial load. The cracks propagated the most in onlay restorations, where the highest displacement was observed. In contrast, the most successful results were observed in overlay restorations. Overlay restorations also showed better fatigue performance. LS materials exhibited more successful results than PICN materials. LS materials, which can be used in PPIRs, yield better results compared to PICN materials. While inlay restorations demonstrated relatively successful results, overlay and onlay restorations can be specified as the most and the least successful PPIR types, respectively. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D-Printed Biomaterials for Restorative Dentistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop