Clinical Progress and Postoperative Recovery of Rhinoplasty

A special issue of Life (ISSN 2075-1729). This special issue belongs to the section "Medical Research".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2024) | Viewed by 1353

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Independent Researcher, Nice, France
Interests: ENT; head and neck surgery; facial plastic surgery; maxillo-facial surgery

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

“Clinical Progress and Postoperative Recovery of Rhinoplasty” is a very current and fascinating topic. Many recent advances have been game-changing in rhinoplasty procedures, enabling us to reduce common problems, expand the indications, and strive for perfection in long-lasting results. The term "progress" in this context of surgical rhinoplasty procedures typically refers to techniques, technologies, or approaches that go beyond the standard or traditional methods. It implies that the surgeon is introducing cutting-edge or innovative methods to achieve more natural, precise, and refined results. In this Special Issue, world-renowned authors introduce not only how the new technologies have impacted their practice and the postoperative period, but also how education has benefitted from the game-changing new communication systems, and how patients’ information has dramatically changed over these last years. The aim of this Special Issue of Life will be to share these recent critical advances with readers interested in the field of rhinoplasty.

Among all the progress we have observed in the last few decades, teaching new advances to residents and to surgeons has dramatically and positively changed: video endoscopy, scientific webinars, videos of surgical procedures, and multiple specialized meetings allow for showing and explaining procedures.  Much progress is derived from better knowledge of surgical anatomy and in-depth understanding of nasal structures biomechanics. Following recent advances in spreading preservation rhinoplasty philosophy, a revolution took place in the concept of modifying the nose without destroying its structures. Moreover, the most famous rhinoplasty surgeons discovered these new procedures and contributed immensely to their technical development and improvement.

Planning rhinoplasty has drawn immense advantages from advanced imaging and simulation software such as 3D CT scan and/or cone beam CT to analyze the patient's nasal anatomy accurately, which are commonly used nowadays. Surgeons use these tools to plan the surgery meticulously and predict the potential outcomes according to specific and customized surgical procedures, taking into account each patient's unique nasal anatomy. Limited incisions and undermining allow reducing visible scarring and potentially shorten the recovery period.

Sharing information wit patients has changed dramatically from the “middle-age” basic photographic system. Preoperative computer simulations on patient’s pictures allow the surgeon to share, sometimes in 3D, the changes that might occur and discuss with the patient the procedures that can be performed.  Surgeons assess the patient's specific nasal characteristics and consider how interventions might affect the overall balance and harmony of their face. Moreover, social media is used to spread patients’ information by showing surgical techniques, and internet forums are available where many patients nowadays share their experience, not only with each other but also with further candidates for rhinoplasties.

Regarding surgical techniques, many new procedures and new tools have dramatically changed rhinoplasty approaches, not only in primary procedures, but also in revisions.  Piezo-electric instruments allowing for rhinosculpture and cartilage chondroplasty have changed the quality of the outcome. Structure rhinoplasty procedures have brought immense improvements in the quality of nasal reconstruction when the anatomy of the nose has been modified so much that no more natural structure is available. New approaches are spreading nowadays since the introduction of fillers in the medical options paradigm to improve nasal reshaping in non-operated patients or in secondary cases. However, an important debate is currently dividing surgeons and cosmetologists regarding the benefit–risk ratio of the different procedures.

Managing the postoperative period is still a challenge, as the healing process is not only related to the medical or surgical procedures, but also the patient’s specific ability to heal properly, their personal behavior and their ability to attend the mandatory postoperative visits. Recent works on the intraoperative use of the patient’s blood cells and postoperative anti-inflammatory diet have shown effectiveness. Better knowledge in perioperative skin care is very important for the way the soft tissues will heal after the surgery.

This Special Issue of Life “Clinical Progress and Postoperative Recovery of Rhinoplasty” represents a fantastic opportunity for the reader to discover important information given by world-renowned experts about all these recent game-changing processes that have occurred in the field of rhinoplasty.

Dr. Yves Saban
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Life is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • rhinoplasty
  • ENT
  • surgery
  • postperative recovery

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 2047 KiB  
Article
Measurement of Nasal Contour Landmarks in Septorhinoplasties with Special Regard to the Course of Postoperative Swelling Using a Three-Dimensional Camera
by Katharina Storck, Julia Eufinger, Sebastian Kotz, Carolina Classen and Lucas M. Ritschl
Life 2024, 14(7), 813; https://doi.org/10.3390/life14070813 - 27 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1079
Abstract
The integration of three-dimensional (3D) cameras into clinical practice for pre-operative planning and post-operative monitoring of rhinoplasties remains controversial. However, this technology offers the advantage of capturing the 3D surface without exposing patients to potentially harmful radiation. Continuous assessment allows the follow-up of [...] Read more.
The integration of three-dimensional (3D) cameras into clinical practice for pre-operative planning and post-operative monitoring of rhinoplasties remains controversial. However, this technology offers the advantage of capturing the 3D surface without exposing patients to potentially harmful radiation. Continuous assessment allows the follow-up of swelling patterns, cartilage alignment, and bone remodeling. The primary objective of our study was to quantify changes in nasal structure before and after rhinoplasty by using 3D photography. Our study cohort consisted of 29 patients who underwent open structural rhinoplasty. We used the Artec Space Spider camera to acquire a total of 103 3D images. We collected pre-operative and at least two or three post-operative follow-up scans, which were taken one, three, and six months after surgery. We evaluated paired scans that included various time intervals to improve our understanding of swelling behavior and to ensure an objective analysis of changes. Eleven specific anatomical landmarks were identified for measurement. Two independent raters determined the distances between these landmarks over time. The calculation of intraclass correlation coefficients showed low inter-rater variability. Statistically significant changes over time (p < 0.05) were observed for various anatomical landmarks, including soft tissue nasion, soft tissue orbitale right, soft tissue maxillofrontale left, soft tissue maxillofrontale right, nasal bridge, and nasal break point. Conversely, no significant changes (p > 0.05) were observed in the measurements of soft tissue orbitale left, pronasale, subnasale, alare right, or alare left. A visual assessment was conducted using surface distance maps. The results indicate that the complete decrease in swelling takes at least 6 months or even longer. Additionally, 3D photography can provide an objectively comparable analysis of the face and external contours. Furthermore, it allows for a comparison of external contours and therefore pre- and post-operative differences. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Progress and Postoperative Recovery of Rhinoplasty)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop