New Strategies for Pathogenic Biofilms

A special issue of Microorganisms (ISSN 2076-2607). This special issue belongs to the section "Biofilm".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2024) | Viewed by 10717

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biology and Environment Science, University of New Haven, West Haven, CT 06516, USA
Interests: Lyme disease; spirochetes; infection; biofilm; persisters; antibiotic resistance; connection of cancer to bacterial infections
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Biofilms have a crucial role in the pathogenesis of probably most human chronic diseases.

The biofilm form is a very effective refuge for harboring cells since it provides high resistance to environmental stressors, including the immune system and therapeutic interventions. One of the defensive strategies is a protective layer consisting of a mixture of extracellular polymeric substances (EPSs) secreted by the cells established within the biofilm. Furthermore, inside the biofilm, the bacteria create unique social interactions and launch various defensive strategies to protect the community.

Biofilm strategies for antimicrobial agents are very different from planktonic cells and include an EPS barrier for antibiotics, production of an altered chemical environment, as well as a very specific subpopulation of cells called persisters. Therefore, clinical intervention against pathogenic biofilms cannot be based solely on our knowledge derived from the resistance mechanisms of planktonic cells.

Furthermore, recent findings from classical in vitro studies on biofilm development and antibiotic sensitivity failed to capture the true biofilm physiology in clinical and environmental settings. There is an urgent need to find novel model systems to better understand pathogenic biofilms and find novel therapeutic strategies to inhibit and eliminate this resistant form.

Additionally, recent reports suggest that the interaction of the immune system with pathogenic biofilms is very different from planktonic cells and, unfortunately, not well studied. Therefore, we need to rethink how we research host immune system responses in biofilm-related chronic diseases.

In summary, a clear understanding of the exact mechanism of biofilm development and its resistance strategies against the immune system and antibiotics, as they function in model systems that mimic clinical conditions, could help us develop therapeutic targets for chronic conditions caused by pathogenic biofilms.

This Special Issue seeks manuscript submissions for novel model systems to study biofilm physiology, host immune response, and new therapeutic approaches for pathogenic biofilms such as original research papers, short communications, reviews, case reports, and perspectives.

Prof. Dr. Eva Sapi
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Microorganisms is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • pathogenic biofilm physiology
  • host immune response
  • new model system
  • therapeutic approaches for biofilms

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

13 pages, 1556 KiB  
Article
Assessing the Effects of Surgical Irrigation Solutions on Human Neutrophil Interactions with Nascent Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms
by Gauri Gaur, Maria Predtechenskaya, Jovanka M. Voyich, Garth James, Philip S. Stewart and Timothy R. Borgogna
Microorganisms 2024, 12(10), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12101951 - 27 Sep 2024
Viewed by 809
Abstract
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the leading cause of surgical site infections (SSIs) and is capable of biofilm growth on implanted foreign devices. The use of surgical irrigation solutions has become a common strategy to combat bacterial contamination events that occur [...] Read more.
Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the leading cause of surgical site infections (SSIs) and is capable of biofilm growth on implanted foreign devices. The use of surgical irrigation solutions has become a common strategy to combat bacterial contamination events that occur during surgery. Despite their antimicrobial activity, SSI rates remain consistent, suggesting that low-level contamination persists. In these cases, circulating neutrophils must traffic from the blood to contamination sites to aid in bacterial clearance. The influence of irrigation solutions on neutrophils’ ability to engage with bacteria has not been explored. The effects of three commonly used irrigation solutions: Xperience (sodium lauryl sulfate), Irrisept (chlorhexidine gluconate), and Betadine® (povidone-iodine) on nascent S. aureus biofilms alone and in the presence of human neutrophils were assessed at manufactured and diluted concentrations. All three solutions, at a 10% dilution, inhibited bacterial growth as demonstrated by culture assays and confocal video microscopy of bacterial aggregate formation. The effects of 10% dilutions of each of these solutions on neutrophil membrane integrity (by flow cytometry and propidium iodide staining) and motility (by confocal video microscopy of neutrophil track length) were investigated with differing outcomes for each irrigation solution. At this concentration only Irrisept preserved neutrophil membrane integrity and motility. Together, this study examines an overlooked aspect of surgical irrigation solutions by investigating their impact on innate immunity and highlights the feasibility of formulations wherein solution effectiveness is complemented by neutrophil function to reduce risks of infection. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Strategies for Pathogenic Biofilms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 12098 KiB  
Article
Evidence for the Presence of Borrelia burgdorferi Biofilm in Infected Mouse Heart Tissues
by Sahaja Thippani, Niraj Jatin Patel, Jasmine Jathan, Kate Filush, Kayla M. Socarras, Jessica DiLorenzo, Kunthavai Balasubramanian, Khusali Gupta, Geneve Ortiz Aleman, Jay M. Pandya, Venkata V. Kavitapu, Daina Zeng, Jennifer C. Miller and Eva Sapi
Microorganisms 2024, 12(9), 1766; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12091766 - 26 Aug 2024
Viewed by 6419
Abstract
Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterium responsible for Lyme disease, has been shown to form antimicrobial-tolerant biofilms, which protect it from unfavorable conditions. Bacterial biofilms are known to significantly contribute to severe inflammation, such as carditis, a common manifestation of Lyme disease. However, the [...] Read more.
Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterium responsible for Lyme disease, has been shown to form antimicrobial-tolerant biofilms, which protect it from unfavorable conditions. Bacterial biofilms are known to significantly contribute to severe inflammation, such as carditis, a common manifestation of Lyme disease. However, the role of B. burgdorferi biofilms in the development of Lyme carditis has not been thoroughly investigated due to the absence of an appropriate model system. In this study, we examined heart tissues from mice infected with B. burgdorferi for the presence of biofilms and inflammatory markers using immunohistochemistry (IHC), combined fluorescence in situ hybridization FISH/IHC, 3D microscopy, and atomic force microscopy techniques. Our results reveal that B. burgdorferi spirochetes form aggregates with a known biofilm marker (alginate) in mouse heart tissues. Furthermore, these biofilms induce inflammation, as indicated by elevated levels of murine C-reactive protein near the biofilms. This research provides evidence that B. burgdorferi can form biofilms in mouse heart tissue and trigger inflammatory processes, suggesting that the mouse model is a valuable tool for future studies on B. burgdorferi biofilms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Strategies for Pathogenic Biofilms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

21 pages, 3506 KiB  
Review
Elimination of Pathogen Biofilms via Postbiotics from Lactic Acid Bacteria: A Promising Method in Food and Biomedicine
by Jiahao Che, Jingjing Shi, Chenguang Fang, Xiaoqun Zeng, Zhen Wu, Qiwei Du, Maolin Tu and Daodong Pan
Microorganisms 2024, 12(4), 704; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12040704 - 30 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2961
Abstract
Pathogenic biofilms provide a naturally favorable barrier for microbial growth and are closely related to the virulence of pathogens. Postbiotics from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are secondary metabolites and cellular components obtained by inactivation of fermentation broth; they have a certain inhibitory effect [...] Read more.
Pathogenic biofilms provide a naturally favorable barrier for microbial growth and are closely related to the virulence of pathogens. Postbiotics from lactic acid bacteria (LAB) are secondary metabolites and cellular components obtained by inactivation of fermentation broth; they have a certain inhibitory effect on all stages of pathogen biofilms. Postbiotics from LAB have drawn attention because of their high stability, safety dose parameters, and long storage period, which give them a broad application prospect in the fields of food and medicine. The mechanisms of eliminating pathogen biofilms via postbiotics from LAB mainly affect the surface adhesion, self-aggregation, virulence, and QS of pathogens influencing interspecific and intraspecific communication. However, there are some factors (preparation process and lack of target) which can limit the antibiofilm impact of postbiotics. Therefore, by using a delivery carrier and optimizing process parameters, the effect of interfering factors can be eliminated. This review summarizes the concept and characteristics of postbiotics from LAB, focusing on their preparation technology and antibiofilm effect, and the applications and limitations of postbiotics in food processing and clinical treatment are also discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Strategies for Pathogenic Biofilms)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop