- Review
32 Pages
Chitosan-coated liposomes (CLPs) have emerged as a multifunctional drug delivery platform that effectively overcomes the key limitations of conventional liposomes, including poor stability, rapid in vivo clearance, weak mucoadhesion, and insufficient targeting specificity. The natural cationic nature of chitosan enables stable coating onto negatively charged liposome surfaces via electrostatic interactions, forming a stable core–shell structure that significantly improves liposomal stability, prolongs circulation time, and enhances mucoadhesive ability. The abundant reactive groups on the chitosan backbone allow further conjugation of targeting ligands, polyethylene glycol chains, and stimuli-responsive moieties, thereby endowing the delivery system with active targeting, long-circulating, and smart drug release properties. Various coating strategies, such as electrostatic deposition, layer-by-layer self-assembly, ionic crosslinking, and microfluidic in-situ coating, provide flexibility and precise controllability for formulation design. These systems have demonstrated considerable therapeutic potential across multiple administration routes, as well as in anti-infective, tumor-targeted, and immunomodulatory applications, by improving drug retention, enabling controlled release, and enhancing bioavailability. Therefore, this review summarizes the synthesis methods, modification strategies, and biomedical applications of CLPs, with the aim of providing a reference for future development in this field.
Pharmaceutics
23 October 2026



![Treatment-dependent modulation of FAP expression and CAF subtype composition in human PDAC by integrated bulk RNA-seq and BayesPrism deconvolution (individual sample analyses): (A) FAP transcript expression levels across treated and untreated tissues. (B) FAP transcript expression levels based on the type of treatment in each response group. (C,D) BayesPrism cell-type deconvolution results showing estimated proportions of major cell types (epithelial tumor cells and stromal CAFs) (C), and CAF subtypes (inflammatory CAFs [iCAFs], myofibroblastic CAFs [myCAFs], and antigen-presenting CAFs [apCAFs]) (D) in each major treatment group. (E,F) Stratification of epithelial and stromal CAFs (E), and subtypes of CAFs (F) based on the type of neoadjuvant treatment in each group. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Each data point represents one tissue sample (1 to 8 samples per patient are included). * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.001, *** p < 0.0001, ns: not significant in one-way ANOVA test.](https://mdpi-res.com/pharmaceutics/pharmaceutics-18-01361/article_deploy/html/images/pharmaceutics-18-01361-g001-550.jpg)






