Celluloid Jesus—Beyond the Text-Centric Paradigm

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2024) | Viewed by 4335

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Religious Studies, College of Wooster, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
Interests: New Testament and early Christianity; cultural and racial/ethnic interpretations and receptions of the bible; religion and popular culture; global Christianity; ancient Mediterranean religions; meals in the Greco-Roman world

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Religious Studies, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA
Interests: Pauline studies; New Testament studies; gospel studies; Greek and Roman literature; ancient Mediterranean religions; history of interpretation; theory of religion
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Integrative Studies, Singapore Management University, Singapore 179873, Singapore
Interests: religion and film; world Christianity; Buddhist studies; Chinese religions; comparative literature; East Asian cinema

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

We are pleased to announce a Special Issue of Religions that reimagines the intersections between film and media studies and the representations/interpretations of the figure of Jesus.

Conventionally, theoretical work in religion and media studies has approached Biblical films as “texts” to be exegeted, with the analysis being focused on the issues of text, intertext, interpretation, and translation from scripture to the screen. Recent shifts in film theory and aesthetics, however, have emphasized an embodied perspective that takes into consideration the text, production, and reception of cinema as a holistic process punctuated by sights, sounds, symbols, and practices of religious significance.

For this Special Issue, we invite contributors to go beyond text-centric paradigms. We welcome articles that highlight the concept of “media flow” (e.g., transmedia and intermedia connections between manga, anime, TV, film, streaming, and music, among others) and its ties to “expanded cinema” approaches in film and media studies (e.g., cinema’s interrelations with theatrical or art installation spaces). In short, we aim to widen our definition of the religious “film” alongside these new movements in allied fields.

Altogether, within the context of our Special Issue, consideration for the cinematic “life cycle” reveals how images of Jesus transform as they migrate out of the text and into lived media spaces, performing different and/or similar functions for audiences and social groups. While “bodily” or “spatial” turns in religious/theological studies—so-called material approaches—are arguably de rigueur, we aim to widen the horizons of inquiry in film/cinema studies by encompassing the visual and aural, sensory and imaginal, digital and technological dimensions of the religious/cinematic experience.

We also aim to expand our comparanda by prioritizing connections to global cinema. In his famous 2020 Oscar acceptance speech, Bong Joon-ho said that vast, unknown worlds of cinema await those who can overcome the “one-inch tall barrier of subtitles”. Beyond the well-trodden territories of Euro-American depictions of Jesus of Nazareth—from Monty Python to Martin Scorsese, from Robert Powell to Jim Caviezel—Western audiences and scholars are still coming to terms with the scope of media and artistic representations outside of Hollywood. Consequently, they/we have yet to fully entertain the prospect that an “image of Jesus” need not perpetuate the visual rhetoric of Jesus as white, physically idealized, or even religious per se. Therefore, we invite projects that analyze the use of Biblical allegory to present narratives about religious, social, or political martyrs, colonial subjects, or persecuted/misunderstood figures or peoples. This approach can include cinema itself, as well as those associated with its production (e.g., Pasolini). We are also open to projects that consider other biblical figures utilizing these same approaches.

We request that, prior to submitting a manuscript, interested authors initially submit a proposed title and an abstract of 400–600 words summarizing their intended contribution. Please send it to the guest editors ([email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]) or to the Religions editorial office ([email protected]). Abstracts will be reviewed by the Guest Editors for the purpose of ensuring proper fit within the scope of the Special Issue. Full manuscripts will undergo a double-blind peer-review process.

Suggested Bibliography

Altman, Rick. 2000. Film/Genre. London: British Film Institute.

Burnette-Bletsch. Rhonda, ed. 2016. The Bible in Motion: A Handbook of the Bible and Its Reception in Film. 2 Vols. Handbooks of the Bible and Its Reception 2. Berlin: De Gruyter Press.

Castelli, Elizabeth. 2014. “Introduction: Translating Pasolini Translating Paul.” Translator’s Introduction to Pier Paolo Pasolini, Saint Paul: A Screenplay, xv-xlii. London: Verso Books.

Copier, Laura, and Caroline Vander Stichele, eds. 2016. Close Encounters between Bible and Film: An Interdisciplinary Engagement. Semeia Studies 87. Atlanta: SBL Press.

Dennison, Stephanie, and Song Hwee Lim, eds. 2006. Remapping World Cinema: Identity, Culture, and Politics in Film. London and New York: Wallflower Press.

Lyden, John. [2003] 2019. Film as Religion: Myths, Morals, and Rituals. 2nd Edition. New York: New York University Press.

Nagib, Lúcia, Chris Perriam, and Rajinder Dudrah, eds. 2011. Theorizing World Cinema. New York: Routledge.

Plate, S. Brent, ed. 2015. Key Terms in Material Religion. London and New York: Bloomsbury.

Plate, S. Brent. [2009] 2017. Religion and Film: Cinema and the Re-Creation of the World. 2nd Edition. New York: Columbia University Press.

Promey, Sally, ed. 2014. Sensational Religion: Sensory Cultures in Material Practice. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Rees, A. L., Duncan White, Steven Ball, and David Curtis, eds. 2011. Expanded Cinema: Art, Performance, Film. London: Tate Gallery Publications.

Reinhartz, Adele. 2007. Jesus of Hollywood. New York: Oxford University Press.

Stam, Robert. 2019. World Literature, Transnational Cinema, and Global Media: Towards a Transartistic Commons. London and New York: Routledge

Youngblood, Gene. [1970] 2020. Expanded Cinema. 50th Anniversary Edition. New York: Fordham University Press.

Walsh, Richard, ed. 2021. The T&T Clark Handbook of Jesus and Film. New York: T&T Clark.

Walsh, Richard, and Jeffrey L. Stanley. 2021. Jesus, the Gospels, and Cinematic Imagination: Introducing Jesus Movies, Christ Films, and the Messiah in Motion. New York: T&T Clark.

Dr. Chan Sok Park
Dr. Robyn Faith Walsh
Dr. Teng-Kuan Ng
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • religion and film
  • religion and visual and material culture
  • Jesus
  • biblical studies
  • film studies
  • media studies
  • world cinema

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

24 pages, 337 KiB  
Article
Guns, Thorns, and Zeal: Popular Depictions of a Kombative Christ
by William S. Chavez
Religions 2024, 15(11), 1368; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15111368 - 11 Nov 2024
Viewed by 619
Abstract
What are the political, gender, and theological implications at stake when associating Jesus with modern combat and righteous violence? Jesus is rendered in combative form across media—i.e., live-action films and shorts, animated television, sketch comedy, graphic novels, and video games. This rendition occurs [...] Read more.
What are the political, gender, and theological implications at stake when associating Jesus with modern combat and righteous violence? Jesus is rendered in combative form across media—i.e., live-action films and shorts, animated television, sketch comedy, graphic novels, and video games. This rendition occurs at a confluence of meaning, most immediately for the sake of generating comedy through juxtaposition (in this case, rendering the meek with a sword) and/or reaffirming Jesus’ prominent cultural value through an association with other popularly mediatized entities. Beyond these initial layers of significance, however, I argue that Jesus becomes associated with violence and brutality for the sake of de/legitimizing politically conservative ideologies with respect to Christianity and American exceptionalism, redeeming the crisis of “domesticated masculinity” and fortifying traditional masculine norms, and theologically reinstituting popular paradigms of low Christology. Ideological “manhood” remains traced to one’s ability to perform traditional gender roles (i.e., family provider, community protector, and father/procreator). To capture the discrepancy that Jesus of Nazareth, as presented in canonical gospels, largely concerns none of these roles, I analyze the hypermasculine Christ, and the various weapons he employs, as part of a popular genealogy of Western value systems and discourse. Though in this article I reference some examples of non-American media, I reserve my analysis and commentary for the stakes and implications of what it means for U.S. Americans to produce and consume such content. In short, I submit that popular America idolizes itself in the form—one amidst many—of a naïve, combative, and boorish Christ: an arrogant and, at times, narcissistic man with delusional views of the world made dangerous through invasive power and authority. Western entertainment has deemed the United States (through its fictional stand-ins) as morally failing yet still chosen. Within this logic, American Christians need not reform their ways as long as they cultivate evidence of their exceptionalism. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Celluloid Jesus—Beyond the Text-Centric Paradigm)
19 pages, 1918 KiB  
Article
Representations of Christianity in Chinese Independent Cinema: Gan Xiao’er’s Postsocialist Religious Critique
by Yung-Hang Bruce Lai
Religions 2024, 15(4), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15040443 - 31 Mar 2024
Viewed by 1315
Abstract
Representations of Christianity in contemporary Chinese cinema are very limited, making the scholarship of this subject underexplored. Filmmaker Gan Xiao’er has made three feature-length independent films focusing on Christianity in China. These films, The Only Sons (2003), Raised from Dust (2007), and Waiting [...] Read more.
Representations of Christianity in contemporary Chinese cinema are very limited, making the scholarship of this subject underexplored. Filmmaker Gan Xiao’er has made three feature-length independent films focusing on Christianity in China. These films, The Only Sons (2003), Raised from Dust (2007), and Waiting for God (2012), are used for case studies, with close analyses of their narratives and formal elements. They are also examined in the social and cultural contexts of postsocialist China. This article argues that Gan’s religious features are significant in the context of postsocialist Chinese cinema. They not only depict the religious experience of Chinese Christians, which has been under-represented cinematically, but also provide a religious critique rarely seen in Chinese films. On the one hand, these films critically engage with the experience of underprivileged people during the Reform period, when economic development and materialism became dominant, while the socialist political system remained. Gan’s religious features provide an alternative perspective that cares for people’s spiritual needs. On the other hand, Gan’s later films interrogate the local religious institution in China, questioning the arbitrary separation of the ‘holy’ and the ‘unholy’, proposing a more inclusive approach to the religious concept of love. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Celluloid Jesus—Beyond the Text-Centric Paradigm)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 268 KiB  
Article
Filming Biblical Interpretations from the Ground: Anti-Empire Matthean Interpretations in Huwag Kang Papatay (2017) and the Philippine “Drug War”
by Ma. Marilou S. Ibita
Religions 2024, 15(2), 212; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel15020212 - 9 Feb 2024
Viewed by 1484
Abstract
Ditsi Carolino’s “Huwag Kang Papatay” (Thou Shall Not Kill, 2017) is an unconventional Jesus film. As a documentary, it presents the problems and the responses by members of the Roman Catholic Church in Metro Manila to the so-called “War on Drugs” (commonly known [...] Read more.
Ditsi Carolino’s “Huwag Kang Papatay” (Thou Shall Not Kill, 2017) is an unconventional Jesus film. As a documentary, it presents the problems and the responses by members of the Roman Catholic Church in Metro Manila to the so-called “War on Drugs” (commonly known as Tokhang) of the Duterte government that resulted in thousands of extrajudicial killing (EJK) victims. From a biblical lens, this paper analyzes examples of grassroots recontextualizing interpretations of select Matthean passages like (1) Mt 6:9−13, the Lord’s Prayer, in the context of praying for an extrajudicial killing victim; (2) Mt 2:1−18, a street theater adaptation showing the massacre of the innocents, representing the beginning of the EJKs; and (3) Mt 27:27−50, a street theater adaptation of Jesus’ passion recontextualized in the plight of the victimized drug personalities. These episodes are examined using insights from biblical narrative criticism, performance criticism, empire studies, ritual studies and a liberationist approaches. The paper concludes that biblical interpretations from the ground in this documentary film demonstrate Matthew’s anti-empire message by recontextualizing Jesus’s story in the context of extrajudicial killings to advocate for political dialogue and action-response against human rights violations and development issues caused by the EJKs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Celluloid Jesus—Beyond the Text-Centric Paradigm)
Back to TopTop