Race, Religion, and Ethnicity: Critical Junctures

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Health/Psychology/Social Sciences".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 15 June 2025 | Viewed by 3505

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Islamic Studies, Radboud University, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Interests: Salafism; activism; racialization; islamophobia
Department of Political Science, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 2 1050 Brussels, Belgium
Interests: animal politics; multiculturalism; racialization; islamophobia

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

What makes race, religion, and ethnicity work? This Special Issue of Religions is dedicated to studying, mapping, interpreting, analyzing, dis/entangling, and de/constructing the manifestations, productions, and intertwinements of the categories of race, religion, and ethnicity.

We specifically invite junior researchers working with majority and minority groups that engage with race, religion, and ethnicity in terms of talking back, meaning-making, dialogue, and conflict.

The aims of this Special Issue are twofold. First, we want to critically investigate the theoretical and/or empirical interactions between race/religion/ethnicity in a variety of contexts. Second, we aim to analyze the space afforded to and created by people invoked by these categories to actively dis/engage with notions of race, religion, and/or ethnicity.

Considering race/religion/ethnicity

Scholars working on either race, ethnicity, or religion tend to overlook the manifold interactions between these categories, leaving the conceptual and empirical intersections between them unclear. This hinders a critical assessment of the logics of their entanglement, separation, the concrete work these categories do, and their concrete manifestations.

In the European context, for example, the genocidal campaign in Bosnia in the 1990s has elicited some discussion on the overlap and (dis-)entanglement of ethnicity and religion (Ruane and Todd 2016; Fox 2000); however, race has mostly been ignored (But see: Baker 2018). Recently, the interactions between religion and race have been given more attention (Jansen and Meer 2020; Meer 2013; Husain 2017, 2019; Tembo 2022; Topolski 2018); however, the ways in which ethnicity figures therein remains unclear. Frequently the category of ethnicity is entirely absent or is conflated with either religion or race (Emerson, Korver-Glenn, and Douds 2015).

We suggest that the interactions between race/religion/ethnicity matter for how they operate as governmental technologies of states, how they figure in people’s hopes and aspirations, and how they allow for certain ascriptions and assertions of identities, as well as for resisting these.

This Special Issue, therefore, aims to excavate an analytical space from where we can consider the mutual interactions within and between configurations of race, religion, and ethnicity, in history and contemporary times across different areas of the globe.

The Special Issue: bringing race/religion/ethnicity into conversation

This Special Issue should animate scholarly inquiry surrounding the manifold intersections between race, religion, and ethnicity, as well as give critical consideration to the kind of work these categories and constellations do. We are inspired by the following questions, but welcome any other writings if they relate to the main objectives of this Special Issue:

  • How are relations between race, religion, and ethnicity expressed and manifested within racial–religious–ethnic configurations (or religio-racial, ethno-racial, or ethno-religious configurations)?
  • How have specific racial–religious–ethnic configurations come into being and how do these configurations interrelate? What are the effects of drawing or erasing boundaries between race/religion/ethnicity and the ways that these boundaries are drawn or erased?
  • How do these configurations engage with society at large on a regional, national, or transnational level?
  • To what extent have racial–religious–ethnic configurations become governmental technologies to assign, articulate, and manage human “difference” and by whom? How do those seen as belonging to a racial–religious–ethnic configuration respond to these technologies?
  • To what extent are race/religion/ethnicity dis/entangled with other configurations such as caste and indigeneity?
  • How have racial–religious–ethnic minorities dis/engaged with the entanglement of race, religion, and ethnicity?
  • What roles do religionization, racialization, and ethnicization play in the entanglement of race, religion, and ethnicity? And how do we distinguish these concepts and processes in scholarly analysis?
  • How do racial–religious–ethnic configurations instantiate norms of humanness? How are racial–religious–ethnic configurations put to work to construct, differentiate, and subsequently manage discourses on humanity and animality?

These questions can be pursued at the level of institutions, collectives, or individuals. Studies can be situated in a variety of sectors or geographies or can be entirely theoretical. We welcome contributions from a broad range of (inter)disciplinary perspectives, including but not limited to anthropology, political sciences, philosophy, theology, sociology of religion, and history. We particularly encourage early career scholars, scholars in precarious institutional positions, and scholars from the global South to submit their work.

We wish to complete the Special Issue by September 2024. Please submit an abstract and title of your proposed contribution by 15 January 2024 to the Guest Editors Mariska Jung (mariska.jung@vub.be) and Martijn de Koning (martijn.dekoning@ru.nl). Abstracts are reviewed by the Guest Editors to ensure a proper fit within the scope of this Special Issue. Full manuscripts of 6.000–10.000 words should subsequently be submitted by 15 May 2024, and will undergo double-blind peer-review.

References

Baker, Catherine. 2018. Race and the Yugoslav region: Postsocialist, post-conflict, postcolonial? Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.

Emerson, Michael O., Elizabeth Korver-Glenn, and Kiara W. Douds. 2015. "Studying Race and Religion." Sociology of Race and Ethnicity 1 (3):349–359. doi: 10.1177/2332649215584759.

Fox, Jonathan. 2000. "The ethnic‐religious nexus: The impact of religion on ethnic conflict." Civil Wars 3 (3):1–22. doi: 10.1080/13698240008402444.

Husain, Atiya. 2017. "Retrieving the religion in racialization: A critical review." Sociology Compass 11 (9):e12507. doi: 10.1111/soc4.12507.

Husain, Atiya. 2019. "Moving beyond (and back to) the black–white binary: a study of black and white Muslims’ racial positioning in the United States." Ethnic and Racial Studies 42 (4):589–606. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2017.1410199.

Jansen, Yolande, and Nasar Meer. 2020. "Genealogies of ‘Jews’ and ‘Muslims’: social imaginaries in the race–religion nexus." Patterns of Prejudice:1–14. doi: 10.1080/0031322x.2019.1696046.

Meer, Nasar. 2013. "Racialization and religion: race, culture and difference in the study of antisemitism and Islamophobia." Ethnic and Racial Studies 36 (3):385–398. doi: 10.1080/01419870.2013.734392.

Ruane, Joseph, and Jennifer Todd. 2016. "Ethnicity and religion." In The Routledge handbook of ethnic conflict, edited by Karl Cordell and Stefan Wolff, 67–77. London: Routledge.

Tembo, Josias. 2022. "Race-religion constellation: An argument for a Trans-Atlantic Interactive-Relational Approach." Critical Research on Religion 10 (2):137–152. doi: 10.1177/20503032221102443.

Topolski, Anya. 2018. "The Race-Religion Constellation: A European Contribution to the Critical Philosophy of Race." Critical Philosophy of Race 6 (1):58–81.

Dr. Martijn De Koning
Guest Editor

Mariska Jung
Co-Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • race
  • religion
  • ethnicity
  • governance
  • human
  • activism

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue policies can be found here.

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 236 KiB  
Article
“You Are My Brother, You Are My Sister… You Should Know Better…”: Racialised Experiences of Afro-Dutch Muslim Women: Navigating Intra-Muslim Anti-Blackness
by Latiffah Salima Baldeh
Religions 2025, 16(3), 327; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030327 - 5 Mar 2025
Viewed by 736
Abstract
This study investigates the experiences of Afro-Dutch Muslim women facing anti-Black racism within Dutch Muslim communities, illuminating the complexities of their identities as they navigate the intersections of race, religion, and belonging. Utilising in-depth narrative interviews with nine participants, alongside an online qualitative [...] Read more.
This study investigates the experiences of Afro-Dutch Muslim women facing anti-Black racism within Dutch Muslim communities, illuminating the complexities of their identities as they navigate the intersections of race, religion, and belonging. Utilising in-depth narrative interviews with nine participants, alongside an online qualitative survey (n = 45), the research captures how the participants encounter exclusion, inferiorisation, and stereotyping, often feeling marginalised in spaces expected to foster inclusivity. Through the lens of intersectionality, the findings reveal a sense of conditional acceptance based on religious identity that erases part of their racialised experiences, leading to feelings of alienation within certainMuslim communities. The study explores the concept of religious innocence, an attitude adopted by some (Muslim) religious adherents who perceive themselves as immune to racism by virtue of adhering to religious (Islamic) doctrine, which they view as inherently anti-racist, thereby perpetuating injustices within their own practices. By contextualising these experiences within the framework of the Ummah, the study highlights the disconnection between Islamic ideals of unity and the realities of intra-Muslim racism. The implications underscore the need for greater inclusivity and equity within religious practices, challenging the existing racial hierarchies. Ultimately, the research aims to amplify the voices of marginalised Afro-Dutch Muslim women, contributing to an enhanced understanding of their unique challenges and resilience in the face of systemic discrimination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race, Religion, and Ethnicity: Critical Junctures)
21 pages, 5712 KiB  
Article
Carnival, Ritual, and Race-Thinking in the Bolivian Andes
by Ximena Cordova and Adhemar Mercado
Religions 2025, 16(3), 307; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16030307 - 27 Feb 2025
Viewed by 447
Abstract
This paper explores the intersection of race, religion, and colonial legacies through the lens of the Oruro Carnival, examining its role in shaping Bolivian identity. Critical religion scholars argue that the entanglement of race and religion is a product of Western modernity and [...] Read more.
This paper explores the intersection of race, religion, and colonial legacies through the lens of the Oruro Carnival, examining its role in shaping Bolivian identity. Critical religion scholars argue that the entanglement of race and religion is a product of Western modernity and colonialism, which has influenced both historical and contemporary power relations. This framework is applied to analyse the Carnival, where religious practices and festive performances intersect, reflecting colonial efforts at religious conversion and racial categorisation. By focusing on the ethnography of Oruro’s embodied festive practices, this study investigates how the Carnival contributes to the construction of difference amid Bolivia’s socio-political transformations. This paper also examines how, by the 20th century, colonial religious frameworks intertwined with secular racial categories, particularly through the rise of mestizaje as a nation-building discourse. A historical analysis of Carnival performances reveals how race, religion, and power have continually shaped the celebration, tracing its evolution from a segregated religious practice to a national spectacle, particularly after the 1952 revolution. The mutually configuring relationship between race and religion in Carnival highlights its role in both reinforcing and challenging dominant power structures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race, Religion, and Ethnicity: Critical Junctures)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 343 KiB  
Article
Framing and Controlling Islam: The Interplay of Knowledge Production and Governmental Regulation in C.H. Becker’s Scholarship
by Brenda Otufowora
Religions 2025, 16(2), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/rel16020203 - 8 Feb 2025
Viewed by 610
Abstract
This article examines the role of knowledge production in shaping racialized religious difference and its entanglement with governmental interventions, focusing on C.H. Becker’s contributions to Islamic Studies in the 19th and 20th centuries. Situated within the colonial–imperial context of the German Empire, C.H. [...] Read more.
This article examines the role of knowledge production in shaping racialized religious difference and its entanglement with governmental interventions, focusing on C.H. Becker’s contributions to Islamic Studies in the 19th and 20th centuries. Situated within the colonial–imperial context of the German Empire, C.H. Becker’s work exemplifies how secular knowledge framed Islam as both a problem and a resource for governance. His framing of religious difference reveals how tolerance operated as a political technique—performing inclusion while simultaneously reinforcing control. The analysis explores the epistemological foundations of C.H. Becker’s approach, demonstrating the intersection of Orientalism, secularism, and racism in producing religious difference and translating academic inquiry into political regulation. By juxtaposing the “Islamfrage” with the “Judenfrage” of the 19th century, this study reveals shared patterns in the regulation of racialized religious difference through secular frameworks, where tolerance functions as both a mechanism of inclusion and a tool of control. These processes not only defined normatively but also aligned knowledge production with national and colonial strategies, illustrating how C.H. Becker’s conceptualization of Islampolitik is characterized by broader dynamics of liberal governance and colonial control. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Race, Religion, and Ethnicity: Critical Junctures)
Back to TopTop