Universities’ Contributions to Societal Development

A special issue of Social Sciences (ISSN 2076-0760).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 July 2019) | Viewed by 11087

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
Center of Higher Education and Policy (CHEP), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
Interests: university; innovation; community; education; values; science; art
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
UiS Business School, Centre for Innovation Research, University of Stavanger, Kjell Arholmsgate 41, 4036 Stavanger, Norway
Interests: innovation; regional development; regional identity; regionalism

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
Interests: innovation; governance; public policy; planning; urban and regional development; sustainability

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Autonomous University of Barcelona, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
Interests: business economics; innovation; firm competitiveness; regional development; university-firm collaboration

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Autonomous University of Barcelona, Campus de la UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
Interests: innovation; the quadruple helix partnership; regional cooperation; regional development; knowledge management

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

There is huge contemporary interest in the contributions that universities can make to knowledge societies.  Universities have always been associated with creating societal benefits (Bender, 1988), but it was with the realisation that we are living in a knowledge economy that really initiated current interests in using universities to contribute to societal growth.  The first of these new wave studies (cf CERI, 1982) took a very broad view of what constituted universities’ potential contributions, just as Flexner (1930), Dobree (1943) and even Alexander von Humboldt had done historically.  But as Popp Berman (2011) traced in her volume the Making of the Market University, these ideas started to expand at precisely the time that America was wrestling with a competitiveness crisis.  Facing technological decline against the rapidly emerging Japanese economy, universities became part of a potent transformation of American industry, centred around patenting, new growth industries, spin-off companies and technology-based venture. 

America was not the only country wrestling with these competitive challenges and in the late 1980s and 1990s policy-makers’ perspectives became dominated by these economic readings of universities’ societal benefits.  With the incorporation of thus view within Europe’s growth agenda for the 2000s, the orthodoxy became established that universities’ dominant contributions came through licensing, technology transfer and business venturing (Benneworth, 2015).  Part of the rapid spread of these ideas came with the fact that they were advocated by a powerful lobby, the American Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM). They launched a survey of their members, research intensive US public universities, and developed indicators that became synonymous for a time with impact as well as providing an evidence base for increasingly sophisticated econometric analysis by the research community (Donovan, 2017). And academic literature (Perkmann et al, 2013) became increasingly focused on studying university society impact through this rather narrow, technology-focused and economistic lens.

But there is at the same time a realization that in this rush to generate policy indicators and impact measures, we have lost the essence of the contributions that universities make to their host societies (Ribeiro et al, 2018).  We see that an increasing interest in responsible research and innovation (Stilgoe et al, 2013) reflecting a sense that technological progress is insufficient for society.  As well as excluding some disciplines either partially or entirely, these economic approaches miss the myriad ways in which universities contribute to changing the world by equipping civic society with new ideas, challenging injustice and reflecting on past failures, by creating platforms for silenced voices and supporting the development of better policies and better democracy.  Gunasekara (2006) made a useful distinction here between the generative and developmental contributions, highlighting the roles of these developmental contributions in changing the ‘rules of the game’ by which societies operate.

In this special issue, we seek contributions that can generate understanding about the roles that universities (here taken as a shorthand to refer to all higher education institutions) can contribute to stimulating societal development in its broadest sense, in particular relating to their immediate communities.  We are primarily interested in contributions that seek to highlight or showcase previously overlooked processes, techniques, methodologies, infrastructures and practices that mobilise university knowledge for the benefit of society.  Although we would not exclude papers covering orthodox approaches to technology transfer we expect that the majority of papers accepted would take a more heterodox view on university societal contributions, potentially but not limited to topics such as:

  • Strategic approaches (strategic management, policy, governance) by university policy makers to maximizing university societal contribution
  • University contributions to societal development in a long-term perspective
  • Universities’ contributions to social innovation, entrepreneurship and enterprise
  • Universities’ contributions to civil society through Quadruple Helix partnerships
  • Universities contribution to strategies and policies for local/ regional development
  • Universities efforts to make knowledge available to non-traditional communities
  • Universities’ contributions to responsible research and innovation processes
  • Universities’ contributions to addressing hermeneutic and testimonial injustice
  • Examples of societal impact from non-traditional disciplines (social sciences and humanities)
  • Assessing universities’ societal contributions: indicators, performance measures & peer review methods for university-societal engagement
  • Innovative methodologies to stimulate university-society engagement, such as living labs, hackathons, , datalabs, open data, sandpits, and
  • Innovative philanthropy and social responsibility creating societal impacts (e.g. social foundations, community kitchens).

Bibliography

Bender, T. (1988) (ed.), The University and the City. From Medieval Origins to the Present. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Benneworth, P. (2015) “Tracing how arts and humanities research translates, circulates and consolidates in society. How have scholars been reacting to diverse impact and public value agendas?” Arts and Humanities in Higher Education Vol 14, Issue 1, pp. 45 - 60 doi:10.1177/1474022214533888

Centre for Educational research and innovation (1982) The university and the community: the problems of changing relationships, Paris: OECD

Dobrée, B. (1943) “The universities and regional life” Twenty-fifth Earl Grey Memorial Lecture, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, King’s College, 29th April 1943.

Donovan, C. (2017) “For ethical ‘impactology’” Journal of Responsible Innovation pp. 1‑6 published in advance https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1300756

Flexner, A. (1930) Universities: American, British, German, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Gunasekara, C. (2006) Universities and associative regional governance: Australian evidence in non-core metropolitan regions. Regional Studies 40(7):pp. 727-741.

Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research policy, 42(2), 423-442.

Popp Berman, E. (2011) Creating the market university: how academic science became an economic engine, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Ribeiro, B., Bengtsson, L., Benneworth, P., Bührer, S., Castro-Martínez, E., Hansen, M., Jarmai, K., Lindner, R., Olmos-Peñuela, J., Ott, C., Shapira, P. (2018) “Introducing the dilemma of societal alignment for inclusive and responsible research and innovation“ Journal of Responsible Innovation, https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2018.1495033.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. and Macnaghten, P. (2013): Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation. Research Policy 42(9): 1568-1580.

Dr. Paul Benneworth
Prof. Rune Dahl Fitjar
Ms. Liliana Fonseca
Mr. Sergio Manrique
Ms. Huong T. Nguyen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Social Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • universities
  • societal engagement
  • societal impact
  • research
  • innovation
  • entrepreneurship
  • regional development

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

25 pages, 1794 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Impact of Complex Multi-Level Governance Structures on the Societal Contribution of Universities to Knowledge-Based Urban Development
by Savis Gohari, Tor Medalen and Rolee Aranya
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(10), 279; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8100279 - 2 Oct 2019
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 4976
Abstract
The current debate aims to reconceptualize the changing role and missions of the university in today’s knowledge economy and investigate how universities’ knowledge resources can benefit urban development and inform the direction of changes in universities. However, there is a lack of empirical [...] Read more.
The current debate aims to reconceptualize the changing role and missions of the university in today’s knowledge economy and investigate how universities’ knowledge resources can benefit urban development and inform the direction of changes in universities. However, there is a lack of empirical studies exploring how governance networks and the institutional conditions of universities in specific contexts can support, limit and/or incentivize the integration of academic activities into societal development. There is a discussion of the various and paradoxical components of university transformation (institutional and physical), affecting their societal contribution, which conceptualizes a holistic and integrated approach towards governance that previously has not been fully investigated. This paper will examine the co-location case of university campuses in Trondheim to explore the implications of a multilevel governance network for achieving the goals of sustainable and knowledge-based urban development. This paper suggests that engineering effective governance is challenging and that factors related to the culture of the institution and their connecting strategies, government priorities, and temporal factors have a great influence on universities’ contribution to their societies. While investigating governance in this topic requires political, cultural, and periodic review, focusing on the interactions of governance multi-layers, this paper concludes that governments’ control functions or some moderate hierarchical coordination is necessary to avoid the failure of university governance and unbalanced societal contributions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Universities’ Contributions to Societal Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 797 KiB  
Article
The Street-Wise University: The Amsterdam Knowledge Mile as an Intermediary and Place-Making Concept
by Willem van Winden, Iris Hagemans and Patricia van Hemert
Soc. Sci. 2019, 8(8), 229; https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci8080229 - 31 Jul 2019
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 5189
Abstract
Universities have become more engaged or entrepreneurial, forging deeper relations with society beyond the economic sphere. To foster, structure, and institutionalize a broader spectrum of engagement, new types of intermediary organizations are created, going beyond the “standard” technology transfer offices, incubators, and science [...] Read more.
Universities have become more engaged or entrepreneurial, forging deeper relations with society beyond the economic sphere. To foster, structure, and institutionalize a broader spectrum of engagement, new types of intermediary organizations are created, going beyond the “standard” technology transfer offices, incubators, and science parks. This paper conceptualizes the role of such new-style intermediaries as facilitator, enabler, and co-shaper of university–society interaction, making a distinction between the roles of facilitation, configuration, and brokering. As a case study, the paper presents the Knowledge Mile in Amsterdam as a novel form of hyper-local engagement of a university with its urban surroundings that connects the challenges of companies and organisations in the street to a broad range of educational and research activities of the university, as well as to rebrand the street. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Universities’ Contributions to Societal Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop