sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainable Growth and a Resilient Environment: Theory, Application and Practice

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Sustainability and Applications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (24 March 2024) | Viewed by 1311

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Dipartimento di Scienze per la Qualità della Vita, Università di Bologna, C.so d’Augusto 237, 47921 Rimini, Italy
Interests: ethics and environment
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Sustainability is an ethical issue (as Zagonari, 2020, suggests: “Environmental sustainability is not worth pursuing unless it is achieved for ethical reasons,” Nature—Palgrave Communications 6), and secular and religious ethics offer complementary strategies to achieve sustainability in the short and long run, respectively (Zagonari, 2021: “Religious and secular ethics offer complementary strategies to achieve environmental sustainability,” Nature—Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 8). Thus, theoretical models are essential to identify the ethical assumptions and ethical implications of any sustainability paradigm that is chosen to solve an ethical problem (Zagonari, 2022, Environmental Ethics, Sustainability and Decisions: Literature Problems and Suggested Solutions, Springer Book). Furthermore, sustainability is a practical issue. Indeed, the observed failures of international pacts on climate change (e.g., the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement) suggest that it is not enough for a technological improvement to be possible or a cultural change to be intended to move the world away from unsustainable practices; new technologies and values must also be feasible (i.e., theoretically successful) and reliable (i.e., trustworthy in practice) to achieve realistic equilibrium sustainability conditions. In summary, numerical insights from the application of theoretical models based on real data are essential to solve practical and ethical problems.

This Special Issue aims to support and spread a methodology rather than focus on a specific sustainability topic or paradigm. In other words, all papers are welcome, so long as they offer practical insights into sustainability policies or projects based on the numerical application of a theoretical model, regardless of the sustainability paradigm adopted or the practical problem analyzed, by clearly highlighting both ethical assumptions and ethical implications. We aim for this Special Issue to act as a precise methodological reference for the wide range of literature on sustainability.

Dr. Fabio Zagonari
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • model
  • data
  • sustainability
  • ethics
  • insights

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

19 pages, 509 KiB  
Article
Pope Francis vs. Patriarch Bartholomew to Achieve Global Environmental Sustainability: Theoretical Insights Supported by Empirical Results
by Fabio Zagonari
Sustainability 2023, 15(18), 13789; https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813789 - 15 Sep 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 951
Abstract
This paper theoretically examines and empirically assesses the ethical statements by Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew in terms of their ability to achieve global environmental sustainability. The theological discussion of environmental precepts in documents/speeches based on the recent academic literature suggests that (absolute [...] Read more.
This paper theoretically examines and empirically assesses the ethical statements by Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew in terms of their ability to achieve global environmental sustainability. The theological discussion of environmental precepts in documents/speeches based on the recent academic literature suggests that (absolute feasibility) Pope Francis pursues unfeasible environmental and social goals (personal fulfillment, poverty reduction, population growth), whereas Patriarch Bartholomew pursues feasible environmental goals (meeting God’s will, following God’s law); (relative feasibility) Pope Francis suggests unclear and inconsistent values, whereas Patriarch Bartholomew suggests clear and consistent values; (absolute reliability) Pope Francis relies on many instruments close to alternative attitudes to the environment (happy sobriety, contemplative style, human rights), whereas Patriarch Bartholomew rests on few instruments close to unambiguous concerns for the environment (happiness from sanctity, ascetism, duties to community); (relative reliability) Pope Francis suggests broad behavioral rules, whereas Patriarch Bartholomew suggests targeted behavioral rules. The statistical analysis of documents/speeches as if they are environmental regulations (using “sin”) based on dynamic panel data shows that Patriarch Bartholomew > Pope Francis in absolute feasibility; Patriarch Bartholomew > Pope Francis in relative feasibility; Pope Francis > Patriarch Bartholomew in absolute reliability; and Patriarch Bartholomew > Pope Francis in relative reliability. Pope Francis and Patriarch Bartholomew together reduced the global average per capita use of the Earth’s resources by 5% per year. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop