sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Farming System Design and Assessment for Sustainable Agroecological Transition

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2021) | Viewed by 8087

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
INRAE - UMR System, Montpellier, France
Interests: farming system, cropping system, farming system design, transition analysis, trajectories analysis, practices management, farming system assessment, crop management, crop production, organic farming, field experimentation, farm management, agroecology

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
INRAE - LAE, Colmar, France
Interests: Farming system, multicriteria assessment, innovation track, farming system evaluation, environment, agricultural, social evaluation and economic evaluation, multi-performances, practices management

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Agroecology, based on natural resources, biological processes and agrobiodiversity within farms and territories, is more and more promoted by scientists, consumers movements, international organizations and farmers as an approach to foster the transition to more sustainable and equitable food systems. Although this promotion, only a very few percentage of farmers have adopted alternative practices up to now.
The agroecological transition towards more sustainable agriculture is presently constraining to conceptual frameworks for designing some final systems or assessing the best strategies whereas the agroecological transition requires an innovative design process for radical innovations and challenging assessment methods/approaches:

  • Design and assessment must be thinking at different scales (e.g. field, farm, cooperative, or food system) to connect the innovation dynamics in both domains - innovations are not only technological concerning cropping systems or processing – but also organizational and institutional;
  • The trajectories of change and dynamics must be integrated in the design and in the assessment frameworks to bypass the lock-in from the dominant system;
  • The notion of performance must be redefined further than only the technico-economic optimum by integrating the diversity of services fostered by agriculture and to guarantee the economic and social sustainability of the redesigned system;
  • Design and assessment must favor the sharing of expectations, learnings and knowledge.

We invite experts and researchers to contribute to our Special Issue with original research, both methodological and experimental, and reviews covering all issues related to Farming System Design and Assessment for Sustainable Agroecological Transition. Authors are particularly encouraged to propose multidisciplinary articles that bridge agronomy, cropping and farming system research with ecological, genetic, environmental, economic and social sciences. Systemic approaches at the livestock, field, and farm are encouraged

Dr. Anne Mérot
Dr. Thiollet-Scholtus Marie
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Farming system design
  • Multicriteria evaluation
  • Agroecological transition

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 2647 KiB  
Article
Using FADN Data to Estimate CO2 Abatement Costs from Italian Arable Crops
by Guido M. Bazzani, Giuliano Vitali, Concetta Cardillo and Maurizio Canavari
Sustainability 2021, 13(9), 5148; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13095148 (registering DOI) - 4 May 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2742
Abstract
The assessment of economic and environmental sustainability of agricultural systems represents a critical issue, which has been addressed in this work with a multi-objective programming model to explore the abatement costs (AC) of CO2 for a set of representative contexts of Italian [...] Read more.
The assessment of economic and environmental sustainability of agricultural systems represents a critical issue, which has been addressed in this work with a multi-objective programming model to explore the abatement costs (AC) of CO2 for a set of representative contexts of Italian arable land agriculture. The study was based on the FADN-compliant Italian database RICA and estimates the abatement costs of CO2 emissions in a short time horizon, using linear multi-objective programming and compromise programming. RICA data were used to quantify technical parameters of the model, adopting an innovative concept of a cropping scheme to simulate land-use adaptation. The study shows a quite diversified situation regarding income and emission levels per hectare across the Italian region and farm classes. A reduction of CO2 emissions higher than 5 kg/ha at an AC lower than 1 EUR/kg is affordable only in seven regions, among which Abruzzo, Lombardy, and Puglia show the highest potential. Comparing the estimated abatement costs for CO2 emissions with the corresponding European Trade System prices highlights a difference of 1 order of magnitude, proving that emission reductions for Italian arable crops still require research and innovation to lower adaptation costs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 6733 KiB  
Article
Characterizing Farmers and Farming System in Kilombero Valley Floodplain, Tanzania
by Bisrat Haile Gebrekidan, Thomas Heckelei and Sebastian Rasch
Sustainability 2020, 12(17), 7114; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177114 - 31 Aug 2020
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 4382
Abstract
Recognizing the diversity of farmers is crucial for the success of agricultural, rural, or environmental programs and policies aimed at the sustainable use of natural resources. In this study, based on survey data collected in the Kilombero Valley Floodplain (KVF) in Tanzania, we [...] Read more.
Recognizing the diversity of farmers is crucial for the success of agricultural, rural, or environmental programs and policies aimed at the sustainable use of natural resources. In this study, based on survey data collected in the Kilombero Valley Floodplain (KVF) in Tanzania, we design a typology of farmers to describe the range of farm types and farming systems systematically, and to understand their livelihood and land use behavior. The KVF is the largest, low-altitude, seasonally-flooded, freshwater wetland in East Africa. Despite its values, KVF is a very fragile ecosystem threatened by current and future human interventions. We apply multivariate statistical analysis (a combination of principal component analysis and cluster analysis) to identify farm groups that are homogenous within and heterogeneous between groups. Three farm types were identified: “Monocrop rice producer”, “Diversifier”, and “Agropastoralist”. Monocrop rice producers are the dominant farm types, accounting for 65 percent of the farm households in the valley, characterized by more than 80 percent of the land allocated to rice, showing strong market participation and high utilization of labor. Diversifiers, on the other hand, allocate more land to maize and vegetables. Agropastoralists account for 7 percent of the surveyed farmers and differ from the other two groups by, on average, larger land ownership, a combination of livestock and crop production, and larger household sizes. This typology represents the diversity of farmers in KVF concerning their land use and livelihood strategy, and will allow to target policy interventions. Besides, it may also inform further research about the diverse landscape of floodplain farming, through the classification and interpretation of different socio-economic positions of farm households. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop