sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Integrated Measures for Flood Risk Management in Impacted Areas

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Environmental Sustainability and Applications".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2023) | Viewed by 6555

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Geography, Queen Mary University of London, London E1 4NS, UK
Interests: climate change; climate policy; meteorology; flooding; coastal erosion

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Flooding is one of the major risks faced by people, infrastructure and the natural environment. Moreover, climate change is exacerbating this risk meaning we will see increased impacts in the future.

Managing flood risk is difficult for many reasons, including that there are: different sources of flooding (rivers, the sea, surface water, groundwater); different organisations controlling different parts of the problem; and different strategies required across different temporal and spatial scales.

The best responses to such a complex problem require integration across science, policy, governance and interventions. The overall aim of the special issue, therefore, is to expand the literature on successes, challenges, barriers, proposals and analysis of integrated flood risk management strategies, governance and interventions to increase the evidence base for future decision makers.

The scope of the issue is broad but submission should include consideration of the integration of different flood risk management approaches. These could include, but are not limited to:

  • Innovative FRM policy or governance integration across different spatiotemporal scales
  • Implementation, analysis or proposals for flood risk management strategies
  • Modelling or analysis of flood risk
  • Infrastructure interventions, such as flood walls/barriers, coastal defences, embankments etc.
  • Catchment level interventions, such as land-use planning, nature-based solutions, natural flood management
  • Improving drainage design/capacity or introducing sustainable urban drainage (SuDS)
  • Reducing or slowing the flow of water in rivers or in urban areas
  • Property level protection or resilience, changing housing resilience standards, use of demountable barriers
  • Collaboration between stakeholders to share knowledge, finance or responsibility
  • Risk avoidance, through planning approaches or relocation
  • Providing information on flood risk
  • Developing flood warning systems and evacuation procedures
  • Improving societal resilience through plans to prepare and/or recover from flood events

This could be presented as analysis, case studies, discussion, modelling or any other structure that highlights the impact or potential of integrated flood risk management approaches or assesses the level of/capacity for integration.

Dr. Andrew Russell
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • climate change
  • governance
  • integrated flood risk management
  • policy
  • coastal flooding
  • surface water flooding
  • river flooding
  • groundwater flooding

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

14 pages, 867 KiB  
Article
Assessing Future Flood Risk and Developing Integrated Flood Risk Management Strategies: A Case Study from the UK Climate Change Risk Assessment
by Andrew Russell and Paul Sayers
Sustainability 2022, 14(21), 13945; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113945 - 27 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2937
Abstract
As Earth’s climate changes, individual nations must develop adaptation plans to respond to increasing or new climate risks. This study focuses on changing flood risk in England, UK, and examines the policy framework and actions that underpin England’s adaptation from a flood risk [...] Read more.
As Earth’s climate changes, individual nations must develop adaptation plans to respond to increasing or new climate risks. This study focuses on changing flood risk in England, UK, and examines the policy framework and actions that underpin England’s adaptation from a flood risk management (FRM) perspective. Specifically, the flood risk projections that fed into the UK’s Climate Change Risk Assessment were analysed alongside newly developed FRM adaptation portfolios that modified the flood risk projections to identify the potential of different measures to reduce Expected Annual Damages (EAD). The key findings indicate that: the range of EAD for all flood sources combined is projected to increase by 18–160% by the 2080s depending on the climate change, population growth and adaptation assumptions applied; adopting an enhanced adaptation approach presents an opportunity to manage much of the climate driven change in flood risk, particularly from river flooding; EAD from coastal flood risk shows the greatest increase relative to present day; and surface water flooding will become an increasingly more significant source of flood risk. Interpretation of the results in the context of the policy framework shows how greater coordination and integration of risk managers and interventions is required to improve adaptation planning. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Measures for Flood Risk Management in Impacted Areas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

18 pages, 2191 KiB  
Review
The Safe Development Paradox in Flood Risk Management: A Critical Review
by Morgan J. Breen, Abiy S. Kebede and Carola S. König
Sustainability 2022, 14(24), 16955; https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416955 - 17 Dec 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2763
Abstract
Climate change and continued urban development in flood-prone areas exacerbate flood risks. Flood Risk Management authorities often turn to structural protection measures to minimise losses. However, these measures often lead to infrastructural lock-ins with potential unintended consequences as increased safety can induce increased [...] Read more.
Climate change and continued urban development in flood-prone areas exacerbate flood risks. Flood Risk Management authorities often turn to structural protection measures to minimise losses. However, these measures often lead to infrastructural lock-ins with potential unintended consequences as increased safety can induce increased development, ultimately leading to higher losses in the event of failures of the structural safe-guards in place. This process has been referred to as the Safe Development Paradox: a cross-cutting science-policy-practice challenge that requires a systematic understanding in the context of climate change and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Yet, there are no comprehensive review studies, to date, that summarize the state of knowledge of the Safe Development Paradox. This paper provides the first evidence base through a critical review of the state-of-the-art and quantitative analysis of the peer-reviewed English-language literature since 2000, highlighting key knowledge gaps and issues hindering progress in addressing the Safe Development Paradox. It was identified that current research is compounded by a lack of consistent terminology, limited geographic distribution of case studies, and skewed emphasis on fluvial flooding. The review ends with potential directions across the science, policy, and practice domains for increasing knowledge and tackling the Safe Development Paradox. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Integrated Measures for Flood Risk Management in Impacted Areas)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop