sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability and Resilience of Collaborative Public Service Delivery

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 15600

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Organization and Management, Department of Management and Logistics, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 26 Str., 41-800 Zabrze, Poland
Interests: public governance; collaboration theory; collaboration risk and resilience; public safety and emergency management; resilience thinking

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

I would like to invite you to share your research and submit articles in the field of sustainability and resilience of collaborative public service delivery for an upcoming Special Issue of Sustainability.

Public service delivery constitutes a process that ranges from detecting a need for a given service, through creating it, to delivering in the final form to the society. It includes administrative services (e.g., permits, concessions, e-services), social services (e.g., healthcare, public safety, education, culture), and technical services (e.g., public transport, water supply, waste management, energy supply). Delivery of such services is a complex process that faces many challenges (e.g., the diffusion of social problems, emergencies, joint decision-making, and service integration) and constraints (e.g., resource, organizational, financial). Local governments are crucial in dealing with these problems and delivering high-quality public services. They operate at the level of the community and are able to quickly identify and respond to their needs. Nevertheless, they do not have the ability to create, deliver, and improve public services without inter-organizational and inter-sectoral collaboration (Osborne et al. 2013; Bryson et al. 2006). This collaboration is essential because it increases the ability to meet social needs more easily, quickly, and efficiently than individual action (Keast et al. 2014, Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek 2017).

However, collaboration is a very complex process and is of a paradoxical nature (Ospina and Saz-Carranza 2010; Noble et al. 2018, Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek 2019). This is due to the fact that, on the one hand, its task is to increase the possibility of achieving common objectives but, on the other hand, it involves a high risk of failure. The dynamics and complexity of public service delivery make collaboration indispensable and it is necessary to look for solutions that will ensure the effectiveness of it. The concepts of sustainability and resilience contribute to this (Kożuch and Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek 2013; Duit 2016; Linkov and Trump 2019). Sustainability, with regard to public service delivery, is the organizational ability to continuously learn, develop, and reconstruct in order to the joint performance of high public value in accordance with environmental, economic, and social order. In turn, resilience is the ability to cope with emerging challenges, threats, and problems, to learn from them, and to develop from the knowledge generated. Both of these concepts are interesting prospective research areas that could deal with the challenges and complexity of processes of collaborative public service delivery. Although the issues of sustainability and resilience are gaining more and more interest, they are still in the infancy stage (Linkov and Trump 2019, Duit 2016; Kożuch and Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek 2013, Mah et al. 2012), and empirical research in this area is uncommon. In this regard, the purpose of this Special Issue is to understand the concepts of sustainability and resilience in processes of collaborative public service delivery and to comprehensive overview methods, approaches, and experiences in this field. On the base of collaboration, sustainability, and resilience lens, this Special Issue aims to shed light on public service delivery processes, including but not limited to:

  • complexity, challenges, and risks in public services delivery processes
  • variety of collaborative processes in the public service delivery, e.g., co-management, co-production, co-creation, partnership, commissioning
  • environmental, economic, and social order in creating public value
  • resilience approach and resilience thinking in public services delivery
  • interactions among sustainability and resilience in public services delivery
  • impact of sustainability and resilience on the development, effectiveness, and performance of public services delivery processes

Empirical research, case studies, and comparative studies are especially welcome, but also theoretical and cross-sectional studies are needed and acceptable.

References:

  1. Bryson, J.M., Crosby, B.C., Stone, M.M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review 66(s1), 44-55.
  2. Duit, A. (2016). Resilience thinking: lessons for public administration. Public Administration 94(2), pp. 364-380.
  3. Keast, R., Mandell, M.P., Agranoff, R. (Eds.). (2014). Network theory in the public sector: Building new theoretical frameworks. London: Routledge.
  4. Kożuch, B., Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K. (2013) Collaborative networks as a basis for internal economic security in sustainable local governance. The case of Poland. In: Raczkowski K., Schneider F. (eds.), The economic security of business transactions. Management in business. Chartridge Books Oxford, Oxford, p. 313-328.
  5. Linkov I., Trump B.D. (2019). Resilience and Governance. In: The Science and Practice of Resilience. Risk, Systems and Decisions. Cham: Springer.
  6. Mah D.N., Hills P. (2012). Collaborative governance for sustainable development: wind resource assessment in Xinjiang and Guangdong Provinces, China. Sustainable Development 20, 85-97.
  7. Noble, D., Charles, M.B., Keast, R. (2018). The Research Collaboration Paradox: A Tale of Two Governance Narratives in an Australian Innovation Setting. Australian Journal of Public Administration 77(4), 597-603.
  8. Osborne, S.P., Radnor, Z., Nasi, G. (2013). A New Theory for Public Service Management? Toward a (Public) Service-Dominant Approach. American Review of Public Administration 43(2), 135-158.
  9. Ospina, S.M., Saz-Carranza, A. (2010). Paradox and collaboration in network management. Administration and Society 42(4), 404-440.
  10. Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek (2019). Relational behaviours and organisational capabilities in public safety networks. Management Decision 58(6), 1067-1083
  11. Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K. (2017). Inter-organisational Collaboration in the Public Safety Management System. Warsaw: Scholar Publishing House.

Dr. Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • public service delivery
  • sustainability
  • resilience
  • collaboration
  • public governance

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 670 KiB  
Article
Social Capital and Transformational Leadership in Building the Resilience of Local Governance Networks
by Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek
Sustainability 2022, 14(8), 4720; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084720 - 14 Apr 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3617
Abstract
Resilience has become more popular among researchers and practitioners of public governance. Previous studies indicate the importance of social capital and leadership in this research field, but mainly theoretically and rarely are considered together. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the impact of [...] Read more.
Resilience has become more popular among researchers and practitioners of public governance. Previous studies indicate the importance of social capital and leadership in this research field, but mainly theoretically and rarely are considered together. Therefore, this article aims to analyze the impact of social capital and transformational leadership on the resilience of local governance networks based on a questionnaire conducted among 199 local governments in Poland. The variance-based structural equation modelling (SEM) based on the partial least squares path modelling method (PLS) has been used to analyze the data collected. The obtained results indicate that social capital, primarily relational and cognitive, directly and significantly affects resilience, but transformational leadership impacts indirectly. In addition, the resilience of local governance networks is associated with bouncing back and change. These findings add value to the emerging theory of resilience in public governance and can also be helpful for public professionals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2008 KiB  
Article
Effect of Cross-Departmental Collaboration on Performance: Evidence from the Federal Highway Administration
by Warit Wipulanusat, Jirapon Sunkpho and Rodney Anthony Stewart
Sustainability 2021, 13(11), 6024; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116024 - 27 May 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 6653
Abstract
Cross-departmental collaboration, one of the most salient administrative reforms, has been promoted to resolve cross-jurisdictional administration issues over the previous three decades. Nearly all previous empirical studies have examined the direct impact of cross-departmental collaboration on organizational performance without accounting for the indirect [...] Read more.
Cross-departmental collaboration, one of the most salient administrative reforms, has been promoted to resolve cross-jurisdictional administration issues over the previous three decades. Nearly all previous empirical studies have examined the direct impact of cross-departmental collaboration on organizational performance without accounting for the indirect effects of managerial practices. Using data from the Federal Highway Administration, this study develops an integrated structural equation modeling and Bayesian network model used to examine both direct and indirect impacts of cross-departmental collaboration on organizational performance. The structural model indicates that cross-departmental collaboration has a direct effect on organizational performance and indirect effects through its influence on resource acquisition and knowledge creation. The scenario-based simulation suggests the optimal integration of managerial actions to improve agency performance, which is achieved by encouraging cross-departmental collaboration and supporting the knowledge creation process. Finally, implications are provided to present practical managerial actions from the Federal Highway Administration as an exemplar for other highway agencies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 777 KiB  
Article
Complementarity of Communication and Coordination in Ensuring Effectiveness of Emergency Management Networks
by Katarzyna Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek and Tomasz Owczarek
Sustainability 2021, 13(1), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010221 - 29 Dec 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3135
Abstract
Inter-organizational communication, coordination, and network effectiveness have long been of great interest. However, the level of their complexity and situational dependencies still create challenges for researchers and public managers. It is usually assumed that inter-organizational communication leads to inter-organizational coordination, but little is [...] Read more.
Inter-organizational communication, coordination, and network effectiveness have long been of great interest. However, the level of their complexity and situational dependencies still create challenges for researchers and public managers. It is usually assumed that inter-organizational communication leads to inter-organizational coordination, but little is known how these processes interact and complement each other. This article aims at identifying relationships linking these processes and analyzing their impact on effectiveness of emergency management networks. Achieving the goal of the article based on the survey questionnaire conducted with 83 experts. The results were analyzed using the principal components analysis (PCA), correlation analysis, hierarchical clustering, and partial least-square path modeling (PLS-PM). The analyses conducted allow for identifying the dimensions of the research processes, and relationships linking them. This was the basis for building the research models testing how relationships between inter-organizational communication and coordination influence the effectiveness of emergency management networks. Comparing analyzed models points to complementarity, parallelism, and the possibility of a non-sequential course of inter-organizational communication and coordination. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop