sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Sustainability Rating Tools in the Built Environment

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 June 2022) | Viewed by 17577

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
the Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, the University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
Interests: real estate valuation; economics and development; sustainability; climate change; sustainable construction; housing affordability
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Melbourne School of Design, Faculty of Architecture, Building and Planning, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
Interests: future cities; healthy communities; infrastructure practice; construction innovation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

The concept of sustainability has been around for decades, though has more recently come to the forefront in the built environment through the proliferation and uptake of rating tools used to assess, measure, and capture the sustainability impacts of homes, commercial buildings, and precincts. Some tools deal with singular aspects whilst other tools have been developed with broader and holistic objectives covering multiple environmental, social, and financial considerations. Much research has gone into the development of these tools, and literally hundreds of different rating tools and systems are found globally. However, some key tools have gained substantial traction in commercial and residential buildings and community development, namely LEED, BREEAM, Green Star, and Energy Star, to name but a few.

Rating tools in the built environment have been variously utilised as forms of ‘sticks’ or ‘carrots’; either as minimum standards requirements and/or incentivised best practice, either directly or indirectly. They have been applied in numerous formats around the world by various levels of government as a mandatory approach to ensuring minimum standards, or for reporting against aspirational levels of energy efficiency or sustainability. Meanwhile, industries have grasped certain tools that have been utilised to differentiate their product, firm, and clients from those of their competitors, in addition to receiving the financial benefits that can be achieved. 

The purpose of this Special issue is to explore and open up the discussion on the less frequently considered aspects of:

  • How these tools have been used, and their varying success as a mandatory or voluntary instruments;
  • Closing the loop—investigations on the relationships between the typically design-orientated tools, the actual as-built form, and the operational performance as well as what can be learned from increased analysis across the lifecycle;
  • The value implications over time of having sustainably rated buildings and obsolescence issues;
  • Implications for the market—are consumers and other stakeholders being bamboozled by rating systems, especially Stars, that they are losing their meaning, leading to less trust in these systems; and
  • The challenge of how existing credentials of well-known rating tools or new tools for the built environment can be leveraged to generate broadscale change to tackle climate change challenges and mitigate and adapt to form more resilient built environments. 

This Special Issue will contribute to the continuing global development of rating tool analysis and implementation, and perhaps identify pathways for more holistic approaches to the development, usability, and application of sustainability rating tools that make a real difference for improved environmental, social, and financial outcomes as well as in emissions reductions and generating greater resilience in response to the challenges of climate change.

Dr. Georgia Warren-Myers
Dr. Christopher Jensen
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Sustainability 
  • Rating tools 
  • Green Buildings 
  • Built Environment mitigation and adaptation

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (4 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 2201 KiB  
Article
Development of the SUNRA Tool to Improve Regional and Local Sustainability of the Transportation Sector
by Yvonne Anderson-Sköld, Muhammad Amjad Afridi, Lina Nordin, João Patricio, Åsa Lindgren, Carl-Martin Johansson, Alexandra Olofsson, Angelica Andersson and Sigurdur Erlingsson
Sustainability 2022, 14(18), 11275; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811275 - 8 Sep 2022
Viewed by 2142
Abstract
To fulfil the global sustainable development goals (SDGs), achieving sustainable development is becoming urgent, not least in the transportation sector. In response to this, the sustainability framework Sustainability National Road Administrations (SUNRA) was developed to contribute to improving the sustainability performance of national [...] Read more.
To fulfil the global sustainable development goals (SDGs), achieving sustainable development is becoming urgent, not least in the transportation sector. In response to this, the sustainability framework Sustainability National Road Administrations (SUNRA) was developed to contribute to improving the sustainability performance of national road administrations across Europe. In the present study, the framework has been tested, applied and further developed to be applicable for target setting and follow-up at the project level at both the Swedish Transport Administration (STA) and at municipal levels. The aim was a framework relevant for investment, re-investments, maintenance and operation projects and also to make it more user applicable. The study also investigated how the framework can contribute to sustainability, identified drivers and barriers for applying the framework and examined whether the framework can be applied and adapted to projects of different complexities. The adaptations and developments were done in collaboration between researchers and practitioners. The results show that the framework could easily be used and adapted for investment, re-investment, maintenance and operation projects in the planning stage, as well as for small municipal establishments, construction or reconstruction of residential areas and frequent maintenance. The framework contributes to increased awareness on sustainability, and it provides a common structure and transparency on how infrastructure project goals/targets are set and fulfilled. The framework can also be applied to follow the fulfilment of the goals/targets and thereby adapt the project to better fulfil the goals. Identified barriers include the lack of obligations and lack of experience in using sustainability frameworks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Rating Tools in the Built Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 3523 KiB  
Article
Stakeholder’s Perspective on Green Building Rating Systems in Saudi Arabia: The Case of LEED, Mostadam, and the SDGs
by Mohammed Al-Surf, Ashraf Balabel, Mamdooh Alwetaishi, Ahmed Abdelhafiz, Usama Issa, Ibrahim Sharaky, Amal Shamseldin and Mosleh Al-Harthi
Sustainability 2021, 13(15), 8463; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158463 - 29 Jul 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 6215
Abstract
This paper discusses in detail the current level of awareness of the Saudi Arabia stakeholders regarding the use and application of green building rating systems. The paper used a mix of qualitative and quantitative research methods through an exploratory method that utilized an [...] Read more.
This paper discusses in detail the current level of awareness of the Saudi Arabia stakeholders regarding the use and application of green building rating systems. The paper used a mix of qualitative and quantitative research methods through an exploratory method that utilized an online survey targeting experts and construction stakeholders to fill the gap of previous research papers and support the argument of the increase in the level of the awareness of stakeholders in the use and application of green building rating systems in Saudi Arabia. This research aims to focus on the level of awareness of the Saudi construction market stakeholders on green building rating systems in Saudi Arabia with focus on the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design system LEED and Mostadam. It also investigated which rating system responds to the need of the Saudi construction market with regard to energy conservation and water consumption more effectively. The methodology utilized in this research used a combination of primary and secondary data where the primary data were a survey sent to Saudi construction stakeholders where a total of 1320 respondents participated in the survey. Results from this research showed a promising number of agreements between the participating stakeholders to the level of awareness of green building rating systems in Saudi Arabia and to the willingness to use internationally recognized rating systems such as LEED and the use of locally recognized systems such as Mostadam. Furthermore, the research aims to link the results with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) with a focus on SDGs 6 and 7. The results show a high level of appreciation and agreement to the importance of energy and water conservation in green buildings that will be using either LEED or Mostadam in Saudi Arabia and accomplish the targets outlined under the SDGs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Rating Tools in the Built Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1853 KiB  
Article
User Experience of Green Building Certification Resources: EarthCraft Multifamily
by Dwayne Jefferson, Frederick Paige, Philip Agee and France Jackson
Sustainability 2021, 13(14), 7871; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147871 - 14 Jul 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2206
Abstract
To improve the construction industry’s capacity to deliver sustainable infrastructure, guidance on delivering green building systems needs to be more usable. Green buildings have certifications and ratings in place that ensure that projects are environmentally responsible and meet standards in resource efficiency. EarthCraft [...] Read more.
To improve the construction industry’s capacity to deliver sustainable infrastructure, guidance on delivering green building systems needs to be more usable. Green buildings have certifications and ratings in place that ensure that projects are environmentally responsible and meet standards in resource efficiency. EarthCraft Multifamily (ECMF), an evolving green building certification, has been successful in increasing the delivery of energy-efficient affordable housing, and this study leverages user experience (UX) methodologies to understand how to further improve ECMF and replicate its success. This study identifies the impact ECMF tools and resources, such as the program manual, worksheet, and technical guidelines, have on enhancing project delivery for architects. This study conducted data analysis on project specifications, heuristic evaluation data, and stakeholder interview data. As the strengths and weaknesses of ECMF were identified, knowledge on the usability of the green building certification program was unveiled. Heuristic evaluations data show that accessibility and usability issues are present in ECMF resources. Interview data show that architects’ experiences with ECMF resources were affected by some of the usability issues identified in the heuristic evaluation data. Coded interview transcripts show the most prominent participant-identified improvements represented within the data. Resources need appropriate visual representation such as readability and hierarchy to improve their usability. Understanding how ECMF resources are utilized during project delivery allows for the appropriate content and options to be strategically framed to improve accessibility and enhance user decision making. ECMF resources can allow for the inclusion of a broader set of stakeholders by lowering the level of expertise required for sustainable infrastructure delivery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Rating Tools in the Built Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1031 KiB  
Article
Readiness Assessment of Green Building Certification Systems for Residential Buildings during Pandemics
by Aidana Tleuken, Galym Tokazhanov, Mert Guney, Ali Turkyilmaz and Ferhat Karaca
Sustainability 2021, 13(2), 460; https://doi.org/10.3390/su13020460 - 6 Jan 2021
Cited by 37 | Viewed by 5441
Abstract
One of the consequences of COVID-19 pandemic is the momentum it has created for global changes affecting various aspects of daily lives. Among these, green building certification systems (GBCSs) should not be left behind as significant potential modifications may be required to ensure [...] Read more.
One of the consequences of COVID-19 pandemic is the momentum it has created for global changes affecting various aspects of daily lives. Among these, green building certification systems (GBCSs) should not be left behind as significant potential modifications may be required to ensure their versatility for residential buildings due to the new pandemic reality. The present study aims to evaluate the readiness of chosen GBCSs for a proper assessment of existing residential housing sustainability in a post-pandemic world. Based on a literature review of the state-of-the-art data sources and round table discussions, the present study proposes a particular set of sustainability indicators covering special sustainability requirements under pandemic conditions. Then, those indicators are used to evaluate the readiness of selected GBCSs (BREEAM, LEED, WELL, CASBEE) to meet new pandemic-resilient requirements based on their responses to the indicators. The assessment shows that none of the reviewed GBCSs are fully ready to cover all the proposed indicators. GBCSs have differing focuses on particular sustainability pillars, which also affected their responses to pandemic-resilient categories. For instance, WELL rating system successfully responded to the health and safety category, whereas LEED showed better preparedness in terms of environmental efficiency. BREEAM and CASBEE systems have a more evenly distributed attention to all three pandemic-resilient categories (Health & Safety, Environmental Resources Consumption, and Comfort) with an accent on the Comfort category. On a specific note, all GBCSs are insufficiently prepared for waste and wastewater management. In the future, GBCSs should be modified to better adapt to pandemic conditions, for which the current work may provide a basis. As an alternative, brand new standards can be created to face newly arising and evolving post-pandemic requirements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability Rating Tools in the Built Environment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop