sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Holistic Assessment of One Water Harvesting in Agricultural and Urban Settings

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Resources and Sustainable Utilization".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (26 March 2023) | Viewed by 6537

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website1 Website2 Website3
Guest Editor
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 960 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Interests: Holistic assessment of water resources systems and green infrastructure practices. Specific focus is eco-efficiency and sustainability assessment, life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle cost assessment, hydrologic and hydraulic modeling, water quality and quantity modeling, municipal water distribution system modeling, stormwater best management practices (BMPs) and low-impact development (LID) practices

E-Mail Website1 Website2
Guest Editor
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, 960 College Station Road, Athens, GA 30605, USA
Interests: water quality monitoring and modeling to forecast ecosystem services and their influence on human health; life cycle impact assessment; remote sensing; spatial modeling; sustainability analysis; forecasting lake cyanobacterial bloom probability and urban storm water management

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Faculty of Forestry, Kasetsart University, Bangkok 10900, Thailand
Interests: landscape ecology; biodiversity conservation; ecosystem services

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cities worldwide are facing challenges around water resource quantity (demand and supply deficit) and water quality (e.g., contaminants, such as nutrients, sediment, pharmaceutical products, pesticides, pathogens) from growing populations and anthropogenic impacts such as urbanization, intensification of agriculture, land development, and climate change [1]. Addressing these challenges requires collaboration, wealth of knowledge, relevant datsets, and creative approaches for sustainable and robust (e.g., climate adaptative) “one water” resource management. The phrase “one water” refers to all types of water—drinking water, wastewater, ocean and groundwater desalination, stormwater, gray water, rainwater, and more [2]. A holistic, one water harvesting approach can help to address water resource challenges by identifying alternative water resources, recovering these resources for fit-for-purpose use/reuse, and developing new methods of evaluating the appropriateness, robustness, and availability of these resources [3].

Some examples of these creative, alternative water resources, often described as decentralized green infrastructure options, include rainwater harvesting (RWH), air-conditioning condensate water capture, atmospheric water generated from desert air, fog water collection, and on-site gray water treatment and reuse [4]. For example, RWH has been creatively used globally to address water scarcity for various ecosystem uses, including crop irrigation requirements, and to meet the water resource needs of a growing urban population. While countries in North America, Europe, and Australia have utilized RWH primarily for non-potable uses, countries in Asia and South Africa employ it for potable uses. Studies have explored RWH cost impacts, water savings, potential human health impacts, designs, energy use, and hydrologic impacts [5–8].

This Special Issue of Sustainability aims to demonstrate a comprehensive assessment of one water harvesting by publishing research and review papers. This Special Issue collection provides the first synthesis of designs and analyses of one water harvesting in urban and agricultural settings, both in theory and in practice. The scope will include the following aspects of one water harvesting:

  1. State-of-the-art reviews offering insights, approaches, best management practices (BMPs), tools, and techniques for holistic, one water harvesting practices;
  2. Designs (centralized versus decentralized one water harvesting systems in urban and agricultural settings);
  3. Integration of climate change uncertainties and biodiversity;
  4. Water quantity versus quality assessment of one water harvesting systems;
  5. Assessment of competing water demands for crops, hydropower, and aquaculture;
  6. Life cycle assessment of one water harvesting systems;
  7. Life cycle cost assessment of one water harvesting systems;
  8. One water in practice: case studies;
  9. Sustainability assessment of one water harvesting systems by integrating ecological/environmental, economic, social, political, and technological pillars.

Literature Cited:

  1. S. R. Ghimire, J. M. Johnston, W. W. Ingwersen, T. R. Hawkins, Life cycle assessment of domestic and agricultural rainwater harvesting systems. Environmental science & technology 48, 4069-4077 (2014).
  2. U. W. Alliance, "One Water for America Policy Framework," (US Water Alliance, Washington, DC 2017).
  3. USEPA, in Water Research. (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 2020).
  4. S. R. Ghimire et al., Life cycle assessment of a rainwater harvesting system compared with an AC condensate harvesting system. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 146, 536-548 (2019).
  5. S. R. Ghimire, J. M. Johnston, A modified eco‐efficiency framework and methodology for advancing the state of practice of sustainability analysis as applied to green infrastructure. Integrated environmental assessment and management 13, 821-831 (2017).
  6. S. R. Ghimire, J. M. Johnston, Impacts of domestic and agricultural rainwater harvesting systems on watershed hydrology: A case study in the Albemarle-Pamlico river basins (USA). Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology 13, 159-171 (2013).
  7. S. R. Ghimire, J. M. Johnston, Sustainability assessment of agricultural rainwater harvesting: Evaluation of alternative crop types and irrigation practices. PloS one 14, e0216452 (2019).
  8. S. R. Ghimire, J. M. Johnston, W. W. Ingwersen, S. Sojka, Life cycle assessment of a commercial rainwater harvesting system compared with a municipal water supply system. Journal of cleaner production 151, 74-86 (2017).

Dr. Santosh Raj Ghimire
Dr. John M. Johnston
Prof. Dr. Yongyut Trisurat
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • one water
  • water harvesting
  • urban
  • agriculture
  • water quality and quantity
  • climate change
  • sustainability

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

33 pages, 5162 KiB  
Article
Holistic Sustainability Assessment of Riparian Buffer Designs: Evaluation of Alternative Buffer Policy Scenarios Integrating Stream Water Quality and Costs
by Santosh R. Ghimire, Adam C. Nayak, Joel Corona, Rajbir Parmar, Raghavan Srinivasan, Katie Mendoza and John M. Johnston
Sustainability 2022, 14(19), 12278; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912278 - 27 Sep 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1938
Abstract
Riparian buffer zones (RBZs) have been shown to be effective best management practices (BMPs) in controlling non-point source pollutants in waterbodies. However, the holistic sustainability assessment of individual RBZ designs is lacking. We present a methodology for evaluating the holistic sustainability of RBZ [...] Read more.
Riparian buffer zones (RBZs) have been shown to be effective best management practices (BMPs) in controlling non-point source pollutants in waterbodies. However, the holistic sustainability assessment of individual RBZ designs is lacking. We present a methodology for evaluating the holistic sustainability of RBZ policy scenarios by integrating environmental and economic indicators simulated in three watersheds in the southeastern USA. We developed three unique sets of 40, 32, and 48 RBZ policy scenarios as decision management objectives (DMOs), respectively, in Back Creek, Sycamore Creek, and Greens Mill Run watersheds (Virginia and North Carolina) by combining the RBZ—widths with vegetation types (grass, urban, naturalized, wildlife, three-zone forest, and two-zone forest). We adapted the RBZ—hydrologic and water quality system assessment data of instream water quality parameters (dissolved oxygen, total phosphorus, total nitrogen, total suspended solids—sediment and biochemical oxygen demand) as environmental indicators, recently published by U.S. EPA. We calculated 20-year net present value costs as economic indicators using the RBZ’s establishment, maintenance, and opportunity costs data published by the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The mean normalized net present value costs varied by DMOs ranging from 4% (grass RBZ—1.9 m) to 500% (wildlife RBZ—91.4 m) across all watersheds, due primarily to the width and the opportunity costs. The mean normalized environmental indicators varied by watersheds, with the largest change in total nitrogen due to urban RBZs in Back Creek (60–95%), Sycamore Creek (37–91%), and Greens Mill (52–93%). The holistic sustainability assessments revealed the least to most sustainable DMOs for each watershed, from least sustainable wildlife RBZ (score of 0.54), three-zone forest RBZ (0.32), and three-zone forest RBZ (0.62), respectively, for Back Creek, Sycamore Creek, and Greens Mill, to most sustainable urban RBZ (1.00) for all watersheds. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 7171 KiB  
Article
Sensitivity of Riparian Buffer Designs to Climate Change—Nutrient and Sediment Loading to Streams: A Case Study in the Albemarle-Pamlico River Basins (USA) Using HAWQS
by Santosh R. Ghimire, Joel Corona, Rajbir Parmar, Gouri Mahadwar, Raghavan Srinivasan, Katie Mendoza and John M. Johnston
Sustainability 2021, 13(22), 12380; https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212380 - 9 Nov 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3298
Abstract
Riparian buffer zones (RBZs) provide multiple benefits to watershed ecosystems. We aimed to conduct an extensive sensitivity analysis of the RBZ designs to climate change nutrient and sediment loadings to streams. We designed 135 simulation scenarios starting with the six baselines RBZs (grass, [...] Read more.
Riparian buffer zones (RBZs) provide multiple benefits to watershed ecosystems. We aimed to conduct an extensive sensitivity analysis of the RBZ designs to climate change nutrient and sediment loadings to streams. We designed 135 simulation scenarios starting with the six baselines RBZs (grass, urban, two-zone forest, three-zone forest, wildlife, and naturalized) in three 12-digit Hydrologic Unit Code watersheds within the Albemarle-Pamlico river basin (USA). Using the hydrologic and water quality system (HAWQS), we assessed the sensitivity of the designs to five water quality indicator (WQI) parameters: dissolved oxygen (DO), total phosphorous (TP), total nitrogen (TN), sediment (SD), and biochemical oxygen demand (BD). To understand the climate mitigation potential of RBZs, we identified a subset of future climate change projection models of air temperature and precipitation using EPA’s Locating and Selecting Scenarios Online tool. Analyses revealed optimal RBZ designs for the three watersheds. In terms of watershed ecosystem services sustainability, the optimal Urban RBZ in contemporary climate (1983–2018) reduced SD from 61–96%, TN from 34–55%, TP from 9–48%, and BD from 53–99%, and raised DO from 4–10% with respect to No-RBZ in the three watersheds. The late century’s (2070–2099) extreme mean annual climate changes significantly increased the projected SD and BD; however, the addition of urban RBZs was projected to offset the climate change reducing SD from 28–94% and BD from 69–93% in the watersheds. All other types of RBZs are also projected to fully mitigate the climate change impacts on WQI parameters except three-zone RBZ. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop