sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Boundary Organizations & Sustainability

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 November 2020) | Viewed by 3649

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Global Institute of Sustainability and Innovation, Arizona State University, USA
2. Department of Sociology and Social Geography University of Oslo Blindern, 0317 Oslo, Norway
Interests: boundary organizations; science–policy interactions; scientific collaboration in sustainability science; scientific creativity and the social conditions, roles, and relationships that lead to the successful transfer; use of scientific information to improve environmental policy and decision making

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Boundary organizations are formal organizations designed to mediate between the science and policy communities and bridge their diverse purposes, incongruent values, and potential mutual incomprehension so that science and policy can mutually inform one another. They do so by bringing together researchers and policy makers, creating accountabilities and incentives between them, and facilitating the creation of boundary objects that enable researchers and policy makers to coordinate their work despite their divergent perspectives. Whereas boundary organizations were originally conceptualized in relation to technology transfer offices, they have become an increasingly common means of linking scientific research to environmental policy, advancing sustainability, and helping to tackle “wicked problems”. However, despite substantial research and investment in creating boundary organizations for sustainability, systematic knowledge about how their activities are shaped by different types and qualities of social interaction, the broader organizational and socio-political environments in which they are embedded, and power relationships among actors within them is meager.

For this Special Issue, we invite articles that analyze the social organization of boundary organizations aimed at promoting environmental sustainability. We are particularly interested in articles that utilise fresh conceptual approaches to understand boundary organizations, that examine boundary organizations in new social contexts or in relation to new environmental issues, and that are developing new concepts, methods, and metrics for analyzing boundary organizations to determine the conditions under which they can be made most effective. Cross-case comparative studies of boundary organizations are particularly welcome.

Dr. John N. Parker
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Boundary organizations
  • boundary objects
  • science-policy interactions
  • collaboration
  • environmental management
  • environmental policy
  • science-policy interactions
  • co-production
  • knowledge utilization
  • knowledge transfer

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

14 pages, 279 KiB  
Article
Learning from the Experiences of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Balancing Science and Policy to Enable Trustworthy Knowledge
by Karin M. Gustafsson
Sustainability 2019, 11(23), 6533; https://doi.org/10.3390/su11236533 - 20 Nov 2019
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2760
Abstract
To create a societal change towards a sustainable future, constructive relations between science and policy are of major importance. Boundary organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have come to play an important role in establishing such constructive relations. This [...] Read more.
To create a societal change towards a sustainable future, constructive relations between science and policy are of major importance. Boundary organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) have come to play an important role in establishing such constructive relations. This study contributes to the development of empirically informed knowledge on the challenge of balancing different expectations for how the science–policy relation is to be constructed to create trustworthy knowledge and policy decisions, i.e., when to be what and to whom. This study revisits Climategate and uses the public debate on the IPCC’s credibility, legitimacy, and policy relevance that followed Climategate as an analytical window to explore how the IPCC balanced the science–policy relation in a trustworthy manner. The analysis is based on a document study. The study shows how different expectations on the science–policy relation coexist, and how these risks create a loss of trust, credibility, legitimacy, and policy relevance. Thus, for boundary organizations to have a chance to impact policy discussions, reflexivity about the present epistemic ideals and expectations on knowledge production is of major importance, and must be reflected in an organizational flexibility that is open to different strategies on how to connect science and policy in relation to different actors and phases of the knowledge production process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Boundary Organizations & Sustainability)
Back to TopTop