sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

What Environmental Indicators in Life-Cycle Thinking Can Be Developed to Help Stakeholders at the Territorial Level

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Hazards and Sustainability".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 December 2020) | Viewed by 2518

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Arts et Metiers Institute of Technology, University of Bordeaux, CNRS, Bordeaux INP, INRAE, I2M Bordeaux, F-33400 Talence, France
2. Department of Industrial Engineering, Ondokuz Mayıs University, 55139 Samsun, Turkey
3. APESA-Innovation, F-40220 Tarnos, France
Interests: mechanical engineering; industrial engineering; environmental engineering; life-cycle assessment; life-cycle impact assessment; material flow analysis

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institut Pluridisciplaire Hubert Curien (IPHC), UMR7178, University of Strasbourg, 67081 Strasbourg, France
Interests: life-cycle assessment; life-cycle impact assessment method; aquatic and soil pollutions; engineered nanoparticles; denuclearization issues

Special Issue Information

Many methodologies exist in life-cycle impact assessment (LCIA) to assist with environmental evaluation in life-cycle assessment (LCA). Some of them are well known, recognized for many years by the LCA makers, whereas others are recommended by official institutions (e.g., Joint Research Center). However, one can identify many limitations in these methods, such as the non-consideration of temporal and/or regional aspects and the uncertainty of characterization factors. Moreover, if one considers that LCA should give recommendations to producers, in many cases, the traditional LCIA used are non-adapted and non-comprehensive for such a designer.

This Special Issue of Sustainability aims to highlight the latest innovations in the environmental  indicators used in life-cycle assessment as well as indicators useful for stakeholders or actors of sustainable development to reduce environmental impact (e.g., dismantling rate, recycling rate). A relevant indicator should provide hints to stakeholders in order to shed light on ways to redesign a studied product or service or to respond to issues of sustainability.

This Special Issue aims to enlarge the usual scope of LCIA, including innovation with respect to the traditional LCIA indicators, as well as adapted indicators for the studied product or sector.

Dear Colleagues,

The Special Issue of Sustainability aims to gather the latest innovations regarding sustainable indicators for stakeholders. Today, in addition to environmental impact studies, environmental impact assessments can be conducted with a life-cycle assessment approach—a well-known and standardized method. However, many limitations have been identified (e.g., non-consideration of the temporal parameters) and can limit the understanding of the indicator by the stakeholders.

For this reason, we are developing this Special Issue showing the improvements of indicators contributing to help stakeholders to reduce environmental impacts. This Special Issue will cover traditional life-cycle impact assessment as well as highlight complementary indicators such as economical (e.g., circular economy) indicators, mechanical (e.g., dismantling) indicators, and so on.

Dr. Bertrand Laratte
Dr. Gaétana Quaranta
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • environmental indicator life-cycle impact assessment
  • circular economy
  • agent-based modeling
  • dynamic life-cycle assessment
  • material flow analysis
  • design for X

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Review

12 pages, 988 KiB  
Review
Functional Unit for Impact Assessment in the Mining Sector—Part 1
by Julien Bongono, Birol Elevli and Bertrand Laratte
Sustainability 2020, 12(22), 9313; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229313 - 10 Nov 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2309
Abstract
More and more efforts are directed towards the standardization of the methods of determining the functional unit (FU) in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). These efforts concern the development of theories and detailed methodological guides, but also the evaluation of the quality of [...] Read more.
More and more efforts are directed towards the standardization of the methods of determining the functional unit (FU) in a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). These efforts concern the development of theories and detailed methodological guides, but also the evaluation of the quality of the FU obtained. The objective of this article is to review this work in order to propose, using a multiscale approach, a method for defining the FU in the mining sector, which takes into account all the dimensions of the system under study. In this first part, the emphasis is on identifying the shortcomings of the FU. The absence of a precise normative framework specific to each sector of activity, as well as the complex, multifunctional and hard-to-scale nature of the systems concerned, are at the origin of the flexibility in the selection of the FU. This lack of a framework, beyond generating a heterogeneous definition of the FU for the same system, most often leads to an incomplete formulation of this sensitive concept of LCA. It has been found that key parameters such as the end-use of a product or process, as well as the interests of stakeholders, are hardly taken into account in the specification of the FU. Full article
Back to TopTop