sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Global Governance and Biodiversity Loss

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050). This special issue belongs to the section "Sustainability, Biodiversity and Conservation".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2021) | Viewed by 2058

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
IRD, UMR SENS (University Paul Valery Montpellier, Cirad, IRD) and Montpellier University, Montpellier, France
Interests: governance of protected areas in developing countries; ecological economics; ecosystem services; global issues

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Interests: behavioral economics; environmental governance; institutional analysis

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The COVID-19 pandemic has made global inter-dependencies blatantly clear, not only among human societies but also between humans, their production systems, and natural ecosystems. The pandemic has also shown distinctly global and local inequalities, as well as a variety of problems related to governance gaps in various fields—from health systems to biodiversity conservation.

Recent analyses on the causes of biodiversity loss have shown the importance of international dynamics in driving land-use changes resulting in large-scale clearing of native ecosystems. The expansion of export-oriented mono-crops, mining, and timber extraction (to supply the consumption in distant world regions) is among the most important drivers of tropical biodiversity decline. Such global socio-environmental interactions and inter-dependencies, mediated by international networks and value chains (often referred to as “telecoupling”), call for a focus on governance mechanisms at the global level. It is highly probable that the global governance gap in the field of biodiversity conservation is one of the most remarkable challenges the planet is currently facing, jointly with climate change (a problem with which biodiversity loss is also intertwined). 

The decision stakes of global biodiversity governance surpass domains at the national policy level, including setting goals within the framework of international conventions, corporate decisions regarding international outsourcing strategies and standards, consumption patterns, and the policy agenda and projects of big conservation NGOs.

This Special Issue aims to provide an outlet for studies dealing with the analysis of global relations, processes, inter-dependencies, and governance settings shaping biodiversity conservation and loss. Articles addressing the drivers of tropical biodiversity loss—and the associated governance challenges—across geographical scales are particularly welcome.

Dr. Philippe Méral
Dr. Roldan Muradian
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • deforestation
  • governance
  • international agreements
  • global value chains

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

20 pages, 2588 KiB  
Article
Participatory Approach to Wetland Governance: The Case of The Memorandum of Understanding of the Sečovlje Salina Nature Park
by Katarina Polajnar Horvat, Primož Gašperič, Kim Leban, Jure Tičar and Aleš Smrekar
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 9920; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14169920 - 11 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1431
Abstract
Wetlands are defined as dynamic ecosystems that combine the characteristics of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and are important from ecological as well as social and economic perspectives. In response to the intense degradation and alteration of wetlands, communities have developed various management strategies. [...] Read more.
Wetlands are defined as dynamic ecosystems that combine the characteristics of aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems and are important from ecological as well as social and economic perspectives. In response to the intense degradation and alteration of wetlands, communities have developed various management strategies. One of the ways to achieve more effective participatory wetland management is to introduce the concept of a Wetland Contract, a voluntary agreement that ensures sustainable management and development of wetlands. This study on the Sečovlje Salina Nature Park in Slovenia follows the methodology of the preparation (legal framework, scientific description and stakeholder analysis) and implementation (organization of Territorial Labs, scenario planning and development) stages of the Wetland Contract concept. Of approximately 200 potential stakeholders, 34 participated in the Territorial Labs, and 16 stakeholders signed the less binding type of Wetland Contract, called the Memorandum of Understanding. The Memorandum of Understanding and its implementation process, which included systematic cross-sectoral participation, successfully overcame conflicts between stakeholders with different interests. The methodology used has shown great potential for further applications in wetlands of common interest. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Global Governance and Biodiversity Loss)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop