sustainability-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

The New Era of Sustainable Public Procurement

A special issue of Sustainability (ISSN 2071-1050).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2022) | Viewed by 9050

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Centre for Sustainability, Health and Environment, Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Interests: sustainable public procurement; solution focused sustainability assessment

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Economics, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
Interests: green public procurement; circular public procurement; social public procurement; effective and efficient public tendering; joint procurement; procurement of innovation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Supply Chain Management, Open University, Heerlen, The Netherlands
Interests: sustainable public procurement; buyer-supplier relationships; governance and contrating

Special Issue Information

Dear colleague,

Societal challenges abound. Climate change, security, safety, migration, corruption, inequality, and many other challenges, are taking centre stage in the world. Many challenges are connected to consumption patterns and can thus be influenced by these patterns. The government is one of these consumers. It is also a very large and influential consumer. For example, EU public procurement accounts for around € 2 trillion per year, US public procurement involves for around € 1.7 trillion per year, and worldwide public procurement involves for around 17% of the global GDP. As a large consumer, the government should in theory be able to use its purchasing to power to boost sustainable investments, a circular economy, job creation and innovations. But is it? Allthough the potential seems large, scientific insights on what the effects are of Sustainable Public Procurement (SPP), which strategies work when and where and even on what can be expected from SPP in relation to the global, regional and local challenges are hardly found, either scarce or hidden in grey literature.

Therefore, to make SPP the game changer in the hands of the government it can be, we need research on the current status of SPP, in the complex interdisciplinary interactions that leads to effective or ineffective SPP. And we need answers to questions such as: What are barriers and drivers for succes? What are the effects of SPP on the environment, on social challenges, on markets and on innovation levels? Et cetera. 

This Special Issue plans to give an overview of the most recent advances in the field of SPP, including sustainable, social, inclusive, green, environmental, biodiverse and circular public procurement. Potential topics include, but are not limited to:

  • insights in the status quo of sustainable public procurement;
  • insights in where most impact can be generated with sustainable public procurement;
  • properties of buying organizations that explain the uptake of sustainable public procurement;
  • detailed insights in to what extent barriers and drivers are more or less important in different contexts;
  • policy approaches for sustainable public procurement;
  • tender techniques for sustainable public procurement;
  • effects of collaboration on the uptake of sustainable public procurement;
  • effects of sustainable public procurement on the environment and social challenges; and
  • effects of sustainable public procurement on markets and innovation.

We hope that this Special Issue will provide a state-of-the-art overview of this critical topic. It is our expectation that it will provide a resource for accessing seminal and current thinking, will provide a platform for future research, and offer new insights into how this field might contribute to solving pressing global challenges.

We welcome empirical and conceptual papers of every variety, including papers on green public procurement, circular public procurement and social public procurement. We are especially keen to welcome new perspectives and more challenging or provocative works that seek to propose original ways of thinking regarding sustainable public procurement. Papers might address global, national, regional, or local topics.

We would be happy to receive a brief abstract or summary of your proposed paper, if you wish to enquire about the appropriateness of your submission for consideration in this Special Issue.

Dr. Michiel C. Zijp
Prof. Dr. Fredo Schotanus
Dr. Cees J. Gelderman
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Sustainability is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • sustainable public procurement
  • social
  • green
  • emissions
  • circular
  • inclusive
  • fairtrade
  • ecolabels
  • environmental
  • biodiversity
  • modern slavery
  • implementation
  • effects
  • impact

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 525 KiB  
Article
The Effect of Green Purchasing Practices on Financial Performance under the Mediating Role of Environmental Performance: Evidence from Türkiye
by Ali Ibrahim Balin and Kazim Sari
Sustainability 2023, 15(4), 3617; https://doi.org/10.3390/su15043617 - 16 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2899
Abstract
This study aims to examine the impact of green purchasing practices (GPP) on the financial performance (FP) of companies and the mediating role of environmental performance (EP) in the context of Türkiye, a developing country. GPP are represented by their all-related activities, such [...] Read more.
This study aims to examine the impact of green purchasing practices (GPP) on the financial performance (FP) of companies and the mediating role of environmental performance (EP) in the context of Türkiye, a developing country. GPP are represented by their all-related activities, such as green supplier selection (GSS), green supplier development (GSD), green supplier collaboration (GSC), and green supplier evaluation (GSE). Although much attention has been paid to GPP and their impact on FP in recent years, empirical evidence is still needed, particularly for companies in developing countries. For this purpose, this study explores the effect of GPP on FP and the mediating role of EP with survey data obtained from 455 companies in Türkiye. The findings reveal that GPP, in general, make a positive contribution to both the EP and FP of companies in Türkiye. However, the two GPP sub activities, GSD and GSE, do not have a significant effect on EP, contrary to our expectation. In addition, it is found that EP causes a significant increase in FP and plays a partial mediating role in the effect of GPP on FP. The insight gained from this study is that the increase in FP brought directly by GPP and indirectly through the increase in EP may offset the additional cost posed by GPP. In fact, this is an important finding in terms of overcoming the obstacles encountered in the transition to GPP in developing countries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Era of Sustainable Public Procurement)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1212 KiB  
Article
Measuring the Effect of Circular Public Procurement on Government’s Environmental Impact
by Michiel Zijp, Erik Dekker, Mara Hauck, Arjan De Koning, Marijn Bijleveld, Janot Tokaya, Elias De Valk, Anne Hollander and Leo Posthuma
Sustainability 2022, 14(16), 10271; https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610271 - 18 Aug 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2279
Abstract
Governments contribute to the transition toward a circular economy (CE) by using criteria in their procurement processes that trigger the supply of circular products and services, namely circular public procurement (CPP). CPP practices are emerging in Europe. However, the effect of CPP is [...] Read more.
Governments contribute to the transition toward a circular economy (CE) by using criteria in their procurement processes that trigger the supply of circular products and services, namely circular public procurement (CPP). CPP practices are emerging in Europe. However, the effect of CPP is not yet monitored and hence remains unclear. What is the efficacy of CPP in reducing the impacts of goods and services? Analyzing CPP efficacy is an important next step in exploring how to improve its application. This paper presents the results of an effect evaluation of CPP in the Netherlands, using a sample-based mixed-method approach in combination with life cycle assessment for analyzing CPP-induced reduced impacts on global warming and material use. Two thirds of the procurement tenders in which circular procurement criteria were applied in 2017 and 2018 did not result in reduced environmental impacts or reduced material use. One third, however, showed that, as well as how CPP can contribute to the transition toward a CE. The identified remaining challenges are (1) to apply criteria that are ambitious enough to challenge the market and (2) to keep attention on the circularity ambitions up during the implementation phase of the procurement process. Effect indicators are proposed to complement the current monitoring practices of CPP implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Era of Sustainable Public Procurement)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 6443 KiB  
Article
Green Public Procurement in Mission-Orientated Innovation Systems: Leveraging Voluntary Standards to Improve Sustainability Performance of Municipalities
by Anne Rainville
Sustainability 2022, 14(14), 8591; https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148591 - 13 Jul 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2439
Abstract
Mission-oriented approaches such as green public procurement (GPP) are emerging as popular solutions for governments to tackle contemporary sustainability challenges. Voluntary standards are instruments that can be used in GPP to drive innovation toward sustainability goals. However, there exists a lack of understanding [...] Read more.
Mission-oriented approaches such as green public procurement (GPP) are emerging as popular solutions for governments to tackle contemporary sustainability challenges. Voluntary standards are instruments that can be used in GPP to drive innovation toward sustainability goals. However, there exists a lack of understanding of how to theoretically situate and practically execute GPP and voluntary standards within missions-oriented innovation systems (MIS). To address this research gap, this paper investigates how voluntary standards can be used to help formulate and achieve missions for sustainable urban development (SUD) at the municipal level, followed by what role green public procurement can play in this process. To do so, it establishes a first theoretical synthesis of GPP and MIS. Next, focusing on the Municipality of Amsterdam, it conducts an empirical investigation of 95 SUD projects, of which 55 were public tender projects (in which the municipality is the landowner) and 40 were non-public tender projects (in which a private entity is the landowner), supplemented by stakeholder interviews. Based on this, it (1) conceptualizes six sustainability ambitions as missions and examines each for their formulation in terms of targets and associated standards (problem-solution diagnosis), and (2) it maps the various actors engaged in the process of implementing these missions through SUD projects, defining their positions and interrelations within the MIS at the municipal level (structural analysis). Conclusions and reflections are made regarding the relationship between changing standards and regulations over time, the potential for GPP to increase progress toward missions via use of voluntary standards in public tenders. Until programmatic approaches to measuring progress toward missions are fully implemented, the presence of voluntary standards is suggested as a potential metric. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The New Era of Sustainable Public Procurement)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop