The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions

A special issue of Toxins (ISSN 2072-6651). This special issue belongs to the section "Bacterial Toxins".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 May 2021) | Viewed by 57998

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institut de Biologie Structurale (IBS), Campus EPN, 71 Avenue des Martyrs CS 10090, 38044 Grenoble Cedex 9, France

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Many pathogenic bacteria produce toxins as their main virulence factor before and/or during host infection. Studying those toxins is of interest from both academic and biotechnological points of view, with the aim to understand how beneficial insects respond to deleterious toxinogenic pathogens and how we can take advantage and improve natural toxins for the control of insect pests. The best example comes from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) that accounts for ~90% of the bioinsecticide market although the mode of action of its toxins is not fully understood yet. This calls for further comprehensive studies on Bt and also for investigations to find alternatives to widen the insect pest control arsenal. Interestingly, many invertebrates have acquired and domesticated a number of diversified toxins, essentially originating from bacteria, to expand their pathogen recognition and defense capacity. However, their role(s)—and biotechnological potential—are still largely under-explored.

This Special Issue will shed light on the central role of toxins in the interplay between bacterial pathogens and their insect hosts. It notably promotes the study of toxins at different scales, from the atom to the population, using different methods from different scientific fields, including but not restricted to structural biology, molecular biology, biochemistry, evolution, ecology, ecotoxicology, and immunology. This notably includes the characterization of the following:

  • New toxinogenic bacterial strains with insecticidal potential;
  • New toxins or toxin families in bacteria or insects;
  • Key steps in toxins mode of action, including structural characterization, expression patterns, activation pathways, receptors identification, etc.;
  • Engineering strategies for the rationale improvement of toxins for insect pests control;
  • Eco-evolutionary basis of toxins diversity;
  • Toxins as weapons from—or targets of—the immune system of insects.

Integrative studies combining multiple approaches and/or encompassing different scientific fields to investigate specific insect(s)–toxin(s)–pathogen(s) interaction(s) are particularly welcome. Reviews discussing the diversity, evolution, function, and/or biotechnological potential of toxins are also encouraged.

Dr. Guillaume Tetreau
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Toxins is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Insecticidal Toxins
  • Defensive Toxins
  • Toxinogenic Bacteria
  • Bacillus thuringiensis
  • Mode of Action Invertebrates
  • Biological Insecticides
  • Bioengineering

Benefits of Publishing in a Special Issue

  • Ease of navigation: Grouping papers by topic helps scholars navigate broad scope journals more efficiently.
  • Greater discoverability: Special Issues support the reach and impact of scientific research. Articles in Special Issues are more discoverable and cited more frequently.
  • Expansion of research network: Special Issues facilitate connections among authors, fostering scientific collaborations.
  • External promotion: Articles in Special Issues are often promoted through the journal's social media, increasing their visibility.
  • e-Book format: Special Issues with more than 10 articles can be published as dedicated e-books, ensuring wide and rapid dissemination.

Further information on MDPI's Special Issue polices can be found here.

Published Papers (14 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

9 pages, 1096 KiB  
Article
Oral Toxicity of Pseudomonas protegens against Muscoid Flies
by Luca Ruiu and Maria Elena Mura
Toxins 2021, 13(11), 772; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13110772 - 1 Nov 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2305
Abstract
The bioinsecticidal action of Pseudomonas protegens has so far been reported against some target insects, and the mode of action remains unclear. In this study, the pathogenicity potential of a recently isolated strain of this bacterial species against fly larvae of medical and [...] Read more.
The bioinsecticidal action of Pseudomonas protegens has so far been reported against some target insects, and the mode of action remains unclear. In this study, the pathogenicity potential of a recently isolated strain of this bacterial species against fly larvae of medical and veterinary interest was determined. Preliminary experiments were conducted to determine the biocidal action by ingestion against Musca domestica and Lucilia caesar larvae, which highlighted a concentration-dependent effect, with LC50 values of 3.6 and 2.5 × 108 CFU/mL, respectively. Bacterial septicaemia was observed in the body of insects assuming bacterial cells by ingestion. Such rapid bacterial reproduction in the hemolymph supports a toxin-mediated mechanism of action involving the intestinal barrier overcoming. In order to gain more information on the interaction with the host, the relative time-course expression of selected P. protegens genes associated with virulence and pathogenicity, was determined by qPCR at the gut level during the first infection stage. Among target genes, chitinase D was the most expressed, followed by pesticin and the fluorescent insecticidal toxin fitD. According to our observations and to the diversity of metabolites P. protegens produces, the pathogenic interaction this bacterium can establish with different targets appears to be complex and multifactorial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2496 KiB  
Article
Bacillus thuringiensis Spores and Cry3A Toxins Act Synergistically to Expedite Colorado Potato Beetle Mortality
by Ivan M. Dubovskiy, Ekaterina V. Grizanova, Daria Tereshchenko, Tatiana I. Krytsyna, Tatyana Alikina, Galina Kalmykova, Marsel Kabilov and Christopher J. Coates
Toxins 2021, 13(11), 746; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13110746 - 21 Oct 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4362
Abstract
The insect integument (exoskeleton) is an effective physiochemical barrier that limits disease-causing agents to a few portals of entry, including the gastrointestinal and reproductive tracts. The bacterial biopesticide Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) enters the insect host via the mouth and must thwart gut-based defences [...] Read more.
The insect integument (exoskeleton) is an effective physiochemical barrier that limits disease-causing agents to a few portals of entry, including the gastrointestinal and reproductive tracts. The bacterial biopesticide Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) enters the insect host via the mouth and must thwart gut-based defences to make its way into the body cavity (haemocoel) and establish infection. We sought to uncover the main antibacterial defences of the midgut and the pathophysiological features of Bt in a notable insect pest, the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (CPB). Exposing the beetles to both Bt spores and their Cry3A toxins (crystalline δ-endotoxins) via oral inoculation led to higher mortality levels when compared to either spores or Cry3A toxins alone. Within 12 h post-exposure, Cry3A toxins caused a 1.5-fold increase in the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and malondialdehyde (lipid peroxidation) within the midgut – key indicators of tissue damage. When Cry3A toxins are combined with spores, gross redox imbalance and ‘oxidation stress’ is apparent in beetle larvae. The insect detoxification system is activated when Bt spores and Cry3A toxins are administered alone or in combination to mitigate toxicosis, in addition to elevated mRNA levels of candidate defence genes (pattern-recognition receptor, stress-regulation, serine proteases, and prosaposin-like protein). The presence of bacterial spores and/or Cry3A toxins coincides with subtle changes in microbial community composition of the midgut, such as decreased Pseudomonas abundance at 48 h post inoculation. Both Bt spores and Cry3A toxins have negative impacts on larval health, and when combined, likely cause metabolic derangement, due to multiple tissue targets being compromised. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 3685 KiB  
Article
Anti-Virulence Strategy against the Honey Bee Pathogenic Bacterium Paenibacillus larvae via Small Molecule Inhibitors of the Bacterial Toxin Plx2A
by Julia Ebeling, Franziska Pieper, Josefine Göbel, Henriette Knispel, Michael McCarthy, Monica Goncalves, Madison Turner, Allan Rod Merrill and Elke Genersch
Toxins 2021, 13(9), 607; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13090607 - 29 Aug 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3352
Abstract
American Foulbrood, caused by Paenibacillus larvae, is the most devastating bacterial honey bee brood disease. Finding a treatment against American Foulbrood would be a huge breakthrough in the battle against the disease. Recently, small molecule inhibitors against virulence factors have been suggested [...] Read more.
American Foulbrood, caused by Paenibacillus larvae, is the most devastating bacterial honey bee brood disease. Finding a treatment against American Foulbrood would be a huge breakthrough in the battle against the disease. Recently, small molecule inhibitors against virulence factors have been suggested as candidates for the development of anti-virulence strategies against bacterial infections. We therefore screened an in-house library of synthetic small molecules and a library of flavonoid natural products, identifying the synthetic compound M3 and two natural, plant-derived small molecules, Acacetin and Baicalein, as putative inhibitors of the recently identified P. larvae toxin Plx2A. All three inhibitors were potent in in vitro enzyme activity assays and two compounds were shown to protect insect cells against Plx2A intoxication. However, when tested in exposure bioassays with honey bee larvae, no effect on mortality could be observed for the synthetic or the plant-derived inhibitors, thus suggesting that the pathogenesis strategies of P. larvae are likely to be too complex to be disarmed in an anti-virulence strategy aimed at a single virulence factor. Our study also underscores the importance of not only testing substances in in vitro or cell culture assays, but also testing the compounds in P. larvae-infected honey bee larvae. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

17 pages, 3699 KiB  
Article
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry4Ba Insecticidal ToxinExploits Leu615 in Its C-Terminal Domain to Interact with a Target Receptor—Aedes aegypti Membrane-Bound Alkaline Phosphatase
by Anon Thammasittirong, Sutticha Na-Ranong Thammasittirong, Chompounoot Imtong, Sathapat Charoenjotivadhanakul, Somsri Sakdee, Hui-Chun Li, Siriporn Okonogi and Chanan Angsuthanasombat
Toxins 2021, 13(8), 553; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080553 - 9 Aug 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2454
Abstract
In addition to the receptor-binding domain (DII), the C-terminal domain (DIII) of three-domain Cry insecticidal δ-endotoxins from Bacillus thuringiensis has been implicated in target insect specificity, yet its precise mechanistic role remains unclear. Here, the 21 kDa high-purity isolated DIII fragment derived from [...] Read more.
In addition to the receptor-binding domain (DII), the C-terminal domain (DIII) of three-domain Cry insecticidal δ-endotoxins from Bacillus thuringiensis has been implicated in target insect specificity, yet its precise mechanistic role remains unclear. Here, the 21 kDa high-purity isolated DIII fragment derived from the Cry4Ba mosquito-specific toxin was achieved via optimized preparative FPLC, allowing direct rendering analyses for binding characteristics toward its target receptor—Aedes aegypti membrane-bound alkaline phosphatase (Aa-mALP). Binding analysis via dotblotting revealed that the Cry4Ba-DIII truncate was capable of specific binding to nitrocellulose-bound Aa-mALP, with a binding signal comparable to its 65 kDa Cry4Ba-R203Q full-length toxin. Further determination of binding affinity via sandwich ELISA revealed that Cry4Ba-DIII exhibited a rather weak binding to Aa-mALP with a dissociation constant (Kd) of ≈1.1 × 10−7 M as compared with the full-length toxin. Intermolecular docking between the Cry4Ba-R203Q active toxin and Aa-mALP suggested that four Cry4Ba-DIII residues, i.e., Glu522, Asn552, Asn576, and Leu615, are potentially involved in such toxin–receptor interactions. Ala substitutions of each residue (E522A, N552A, N576A and L615A) revealed that only the L615A mutant displayed a drastic decrease in biotoxicity against A. aegypti larvae. Additional binding analysis revealed that the L615A-impaired toxin also exhibited a reduction in binding capability to the surface-immobilized Aa-mALP receptor, while two bio-inactive DII-mutant toxins, Y332A and F364A, which almost entirely lost their biotoxicity, apparently retained a higher degree of binding activity. Altogether, our data disclose a functional importance of the C-terminal domain of Cry4Ba for serving as a potential receptor-binding moiety in which DIII-Leu615 could conceivably be exploited for the binding to Aa-mALP, highlighting its contribution to toxin interactions with such a target receptor in mediating larval toxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 424 KiB  
Communication
The Rapid Evolution of Resistance to Vip3Aa Insecticidal Protein in Mythimna separata (Walker) Is Not Related to Altered Binding to Midgut Receptors
by Yudong Quan, Jing Yang, Yueqin Wang, Patricia Hernández-Martínez, Juan Ferré and Kanglai He
Toxins 2021, 13(5), 364; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050364 - 20 May 2021
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2310
Abstract
Laboratory selection for resistance of field populations is a well-known and useful tool to understand the potential of insect populations to evolve resistance to insecticides. It provides us with estimates of the frequency of resistance alleles and allows us to study the mechanisms [...] Read more.
Laboratory selection for resistance of field populations is a well-known and useful tool to understand the potential of insect populations to evolve resistance to insecticides. It provides us with estimates of the frequency of resistance alleles and allows us to study the mechanisms by which insects developed resistance to shed light on the mode of action and optimize resistance management strategies. Here, a field population of Mythimna separata was subjected to laboratory selection with either Vip3Aa, Cry1Ab, or Cry1F insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis. The population rapidly evolved resistance to Vip3Aa reaching, after eight generations, a level of >3061-fold resistance, compared with the unselected insects. In contrast, the same population did not respond to selection with Cry1Ab or Cry1F. The Vip3Aa resistant population did not show cross resistance to either Cry1Ab or Cry1F. Radiolabeled Vip3Aa was tested for binding to brush border membrane vesicles from larvae from the susceptible and resistant insects. The results did not show any qualitative or quantitative difference between both insect samples. Our data, along with previous results obtained with other Vip3Aa-resistant populations from other insect species, suggest that altered binding to midgut membrane receptors is not the main mechanism of resistance to Vip3Aa. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 566 KiB  
Article
Populations of Helicoverpa zea (Boddie) in the Southeastern United States are Commonly Resistant to Cry1Ab, but Still Susceptible to Vip3Aa20 Expressed in MIR 162 Corn
by Ying Niu, Isaac Oyediran, Wenbo Yu, Shucong Lin, Marcelo Dimase, Sebe Brown, Francis P. F. Reay-Jones, Don Cook, Dominic Reisig, Ben Thrash, Xinzhi Ni, Silvana V. Paula-Moraes, Yan Zhang, Jeng Shong Chen, Zhimou Wen and Fangneng Huang
Toxins 2021, 13(1), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13010063 - 15 Jan 2021
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 3296
Abstract
The corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), is a major pest targeted by pyramided Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn and cotton in the U.S. Cry1Ab is one of the first insecticidal toxins used in Bt crops, while Vip3A is a relatively new toxin that has [...] Read more.
The corn earworm, Helicoverpa zea (Boddie), is a major pest targeted by pyramided Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) corn and cotton in the U.S. Cry1Ab is one of the first insecticidal toxins used in Bt crops, while Vip3A is a relatively new toxin that has recently been incorporated into Cry corn with event MIR 162 and Cry cotton varieties to generate pyramided Bt traits targeting lepidopteran pests including H. zea. The objectives of this study were to determine the current status and distribution of the Cry1Ab resistance, and evaluate the susceptibility to Vip3Aa20 expressed in MIR 162 corn in H. zea in the southeastern U.S. During 2018 and 2019, 32 H. zea populations were collected from non-Bt corn (19 populations), Cry corn (12), and Cry/Vip3A cotton (1) across major corn areas in seven southeastern states of the U.S. Susceptibility of these populations to Cry1Ab and Vip3Aa20 was determined using diet-overlay bioassays. Compared to a known susceptible insect strain, 80% of the field populations were 13- to >150-fold resistant to Cry1Ab, while their response to Vip3Aa20 ranged from >11-fold more susceptible to 9-fold more tolerant. Mean susceptibility to each Bt toxin was not significantly different between the two groups of the populations collected from non-Bt and Bt crops, as well as between the two groups of the populations collected during 2018 and 2019. The results show that resistance to Cry1Ab in H. zea is widely distributed across the region. However, the Cry1Ab-resistant populations are not cross-resistant to Vip3Aa20, and H. zea in the region is still susceptible to the Vip3Aa20 toxin. Vip3Aa20 concentrations between 5 and 10 µg/cm2 may be used as diagnostic concentrations for susceptibility monitoring in future. Additional studies are necessary to elucidate the impact of the selection with Bt corn on resistance evolution in H. zea to Vip3A cotton in the U.S. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1715 KiB  
Article
Independent and Synergistic Effects of Knocking out Two ABC Transporter Genes on Resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis Toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Fa in Diamondback Moth
by Shan Zhao, Dong Jiang, Falong Wang, Yihua Yang, Bruce E. Tabashnik and Yidong Wu
Toxins 2021, 13(1), 9; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13010009 - 24 Dec 2020
Cited by 22 | Viewed by 3095
Abstract
Insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are used widely in sprays and transgenic crops to control insect pests. However, evolution of resistance by pests can reduce the efficacy of Bt toxins. Here we analyzed resistance to Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Fa in the [...] Read more.
Insecticidal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) are used widely in sprays and transgenic crops to control insect pests. However, evolution of resistance by pests can reduce the efficacy of Bt toxins. Here we analyzed resistance to Bt toxins Cry1Ac and Cry1Fa in the diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella), one of the world’s most destructive pests of vegetable crops. We used CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing to create strains with knockouts of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter genes PxABCC2, PxABCC3, or both. Bioassay results show that knocking out either gene alone caused at most 2.9-fold resistance but knocking out both caused >10,320-fold resistance to Cry1Ac and 380-fold resistance to Cry1Fa. Cry1Ac resistance in the double knockout strain was recessive and genetically linked with the PxABCC2/PxABCC3 loci. The results provide insight into the mechanism of cross-resistance to Cry1Fa in diamondback moth. They also confirm previous work with this pest showing that mutations disrupting both genes cause higher resistance to Cry1Ac than mutations affecting either PxABCC2 or PxABCC3 alone. Together with previous work, the results here highlight the value of using single and multiple gene knockouts to better understand the independent and synergistic effects of putative Bt toxin receptors on resistance to Bt toxins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7755 KiB  
Article
Rearrangement of N-Terminal α-Helices of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ab Toxin Essential for Oligomer Assembly and Toxicity
by Sabino Pacheco, Jean Piere Jesus Quiliche, Isabel Gómez, Jorge Sánchez, Mario Soberón and Alejandra Bravo
Toxins 2020, 12(10), 647; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12100647 - 8 Oct 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3014
Abstract
Cry proteins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis are pore-forming toxins that disrupt the membrane integrity of insect midgut cells. The structure of such pore is unknown, but it has been shown that domain I is responsible for oligomerization, membrane insertion and pore formation activity. [...] Read more.
Cry proteins produced by Bacillus thuringiensis are pore-forming toxins that disrupt the membrane integrity of insect midgut cells. The structure of such pore is unknown, but it has been shown that domain I is responsible for oligomerization, membrane insertion and pore formation activity. Specifically, it was proposed that some N-terminal α-helices are lost, leading to conformational changes that trigger oligomerization. We designed a series of mutants to further analyze the molecular rearrangements at the N-terminal region of Cry1Ab toxin that lead to oligomer assembly. For this purpose, we introduced Cys residues at specific positions within α-helices of domain I for their specific labeling with extrinsic fluorophores to perform Föster resonance energy transfer analysis to fluorescent labeled Lys residues located in Domains II–III, or for disulfide bridges formation to restrict mobility of conformational changes. Our data support that helix α-1 of domain I is cleaved out and swings away from the toxin core upon binding with Manduca sexta brush border membrane vesicles. That movement of helix α-2b is also required for the conformational changes involved in oligomerization. These observations are consistent with a model proposing that helices α-2b and α-3 form an extended helix α-3 necessary for oligomer assembly of Cry toxins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 2502 KiB  
Article
Characterization of Two Novel Bacillus thuringiensis Cry8 Toxins Reveal Differential Specificity of Protoxins or Activated Toxins against Chrysomeloidea Coleopteran Superfamily
by Changlong Shu, Guixin Yan, Shizhi Huang, Yongxin Geng, Mario Soberón, Alejandra Bravo, Lili Geng and Jie Zhang
Toxins 2020, 12(10), 642; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12100642 - 5 Oct 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2758
Abstract
Scarabaeoidea and Chrysomeloidea insects are agriculture-destructive coleopteran pests. Few effective Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal proteins against these species have been described. Bt isolate BtSU4 was found to be active against coleopteran insects. Genome sequencing revealed two new cry8 genes in BtSU4, designated as [...] Read more.
Scarabaeoidea and Chrysomeloidea insects are agriculture-destructive coleopteran pests. Few effective Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) insecticidal proteins against these species have been described. Bt isolate BtSU4 was found to be active against coleopteran insects. Genome sequencing revealed two new cry8 genes in BtSU4, designated as cry8Ha1 and cry8Ia1. Both genes expressed a 135 kDa protoxin forming irregular shape crystals. Bioassays performed with Cry8Ha1 protoxin showed that it was toxic to both larvae and adult stages of Holotrichia parallela, also to Holotrichia oblita adults and to Anoplophora glabripennis larvae, but was not toxic to larval stages of H. oblita or Colaphellus bowringi. The Cry8Ia1 protoxin only showed toxicity against H. parallela larvae. After activation with chymotrypsin, the Cry8Ha1 activated toxin lost its insecticidal activity against H. oblita adults and reduced its activity on H. parallela adults, but gained toxicity against C. bowringi larvae, a Chrysomeloidea insect pest that feeds on crucifer crops. The chymotrypsin activated Cry8Ia1 toxin did not show toxicity to any one of these insects. These data show that Cry8Ha1 and Cry8Ia1 protoxin and activated toxin proteins have differential toxicity to diverse coleopteran species, and that protoxin is a more robust protein for the control of coleopteran insects. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Review

Jump to: Research

37 pages, 2330 KiB  
Review
Bacterial Toxins Active against Mosquitoes: Mode of Action and Resistance
by Maria Helena Neves Lobo Silva-Filha, Tatiany Patricia Romão, Tatiana Maria Teodoro Rezende, Karine da Silva Carvalho, Heverly Suzany Gouveia de Menezes, Nathaly Alexandre do Nascimento, Mario Soberón and Alejandra Bravo
Toxins 2021, 13(8), 523; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13080523 - 27 Jul 2021
Cited by 58 | Viewed by 6971
Abstract
Larvicides based on the bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis (Bti) and Lysinibacillus sphaericus are effective and environmentally safe compounds for the control of dipteran insects of medical importance. They produce crystals that display specific and potent insecticidal activity against larvae. Bti crystals are [...] Read more.
Larvicides based on the bacteria Bacillus thuringiensis svar. israelensis (Bti) and Lysinibacillus sphaericus are effective and environmentally safe compounds for the control of dipteran insects of medical importance. They produce crystals that display specific and potent insecticidal activity against larvae. Bti crystals are composed of multiple protoxins: three from the three-domain Cry type family, which bind to different cell receptors in the midgut, and one cytolytic (Cyt1Aa) protoxin that can insert itself into the cell membrane and act as surrogate receptor of the Cry toxins. Together, those toxins display a complex mode of action that shows a low risk of resistance selection. L. sphaericus crystals contain one major binary toxin that display an outstanding persistence in field conditions, which is superior to Bti. However, the action of the Bin toxin based on its interaction with a single receptor is vulnerable for resistance selection in insects. In this review we present the most recent data on the mode of action and synergism of these toxins, resistance issues, and examples of their use worldwide. Data reported in recent years improved our understanding of the mechanism of action of these toxins, showed that their combined use can enhance their activity and counteract resistance, and reinforced their relevance for mosquito control programs in the future years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2850 KiB  
Review
How Does Bacillus thuringiensis Crystallize Such a Large Diversity of Toxins?
by Guillaume Tetreau, Elena A. Andreeva, Anne-Sophie Banneville, Elke De Zitter and Jacques-Philippe Colletier
Toxins 2021, 13(7), 443; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070443 - 26 Jun 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4325
Abstract
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a natural crystal-making bacterium. Bt diversified into many subspecies that have evolved to produce crystals of hundreds of pesticidal proteins with radically different structures. Their crystalline form ensures stability and controlled release of these major virulence factors. [...] Read more.
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is a natural crystal-making bacterium. Bt diversified into many subspecies that have evolved to produce crystals of hundreds of pesticidal proteins with radically different structures. Their crystalline form ensures stability and controlled release of these major virulence factors. They are responsible for the toxicity and host specificity of Bt, explaining its worldwide use as a biological insecticide. Most research has been devoted to understanding the mechanisms of toxicity of these toxins while the features driving their crystallization have long remained elusive, essentially due to technical limitations. The evolution of methods in structural biology, pushing back the limits in size of amenable protein crystals now allows access to be gained to structural information hidden within natural crystals of such toxins. In this review, we present the main parameters that have been identified as key drivers of toxin crystallization in Bt, notably in the light of recent discoveries driven by structural biology studies. Then, we develop how the future evolution of structural biology will hopefully unveil new mechanisms of Bt toxin crystallization, opening the door to their hijacking with the aim of developing a versatile in vivo crystallization platform of high academic and industrial interest. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 2080 KiB  
Review
Can (We Make) Bacillus thuringiensis Crystallize More Than Its Toxins?
by Guillaume Tetreau, Elena A. Andreeva, Anne-Sophie Banneville, Elke De Zitter and Jacques-Philippe Colletier
Toxins 2021, 13(7), 441; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13070441 - 26 Jun 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3949
Abstract
The development of finely tuned and reliable crystallization processes to obtain crystalline formulations of proteins has received growing interest from different scientific fields, including toxinology and structural biology, as well as from industry, notably for biotechnological and medical applications. As a natural crystal-making [...] Read more.
The development of finely tuned and reliable crystallization processes to obtain crystalline formulations of proteins has received growing interest from different scientific fields, including toxinology and structural biology, as well as from industry, notably for biotechnological and medical applications. As a natural crystal-making bacterium, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) has evolved through millions of years to produce hundreds of highly structurally diverse pesticidal proteins as micrometer-sized crystals. The long-term stability of Bt protein crystals in aqueous environments and their specific and controlled dissolution are characteristics that are particularly sought after. In this article, we explore whether the crystallization machinery of Bt can be hijacked as a means to produce (micro)crystalline formulations of proteins for three different applications: (i) to develop new bioinsecticidal formulations based on rationally improved crystalline toxins, (ii) to functionalize crystals with specific characteristics for biotechnological and medical applications, and (iii) to produce microcrystals of custom proteins for structural biology. By developing the needs of these different fields to figure out if and how Bt could meet each specific requirement, we discuss the already published and/or patented attempts and provide guidelines for future investigations in some underexplored yet promising domains. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 698 KiB  
Review
Dissecting the Environmental Consequences of Bacillus thuringiensis Application for Natural Ecosystems
by Maria E. Belousova, Yury V. Malovichko, Anton E. Shikov, Anton A. Nizhnikov and Kirill S. Antonets
Toxins 2021, 13(5), 355; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins13050355 - 16 May 2021
Cited by 25 | Viewed by 7324
Abstract
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a natural pathogen of different invertebrates, primarily insects, is widely used as a biological control agent. While Bt-based preparations are claimed to be safe for non-target organisms due to the immense host specificity of the bacterium, the [...] Read more.
Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt), a natural pathogen of different invertebrates, primarily insects, is widely used as a biological control agent. While Bt-based preparations are claimed to be safe for non-target organisms due to the immense host specificity of the bacterium, the growing evidence witnesses the distant consequences of their application for natural communities. For instance, upon introduction to soil habitats, Bt strains can affect indigenous microorganisms, such as bacteria and fungi, and further establish complex relationships with local plants, ranging from a mostly beneficial demeanor, to pathogenesis-like plant colonization. By exerting a direct effect on target insects, Bt can indirectly affect other organisms in the food chain. Furthermore, they can also exert an off-target activity on various soil and terrestrial invertebrates, and the frequent acquisition of virulence factors unrelated to major insecticidal toxins can extend the Bt host range to vertebrates, including humans. Even in the absence of direct detrimental effects, the exposure to Bt treatment may affect non-target organisms by reducing prey base and its nutritional value, resulting in delayed alleviation of their viability. The immense phenotypic plasticity of Bt strains, coupled with the complexity of ecological relationships they can engage in, indicates that further assessment of future Bt-based pesticides’ safety should consider multiple levels of ecosystem organization and extend to a wide variety of their inhabitants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 1510 KiB  
Review
Potential for Bacillus thuringiensis and Other Bacterial Toxins as Biological Control Agents to Combat Dipteran Pests of Medical and Agronomic Importance
by Daniel Valtierra-de-Luis, Maite Villanueva, Colin Berry and Primitivo Caballero
Toxins 2020, 12(12), 773; https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12120773 - 5 Dec 2020
Cited by 44 | Viewed by 6601
Abstract
The control of dipteran pests is highly relevant to humans due to their involvement in the transmission of serious diseases including malaria, dengue fever, Chikungunya, yellow fever, zika, and filariasis; as well as their agronomic impact on numerous crops. Many bacteria are able [...] Read more.
The control of dipteran pests is highly relevant to humans due to their involvement in the transmission of serious diseases including malaria, dengue fever, Chikungunya, yellow fever, zika, and filariasis; as well as their agronomic impact on numerous crops. Many bacteria are able to produce proteins that are active against insect species. These bacteria include Bacillus thuringiensis, the most widely-studied pesticidal bacterium, which synthesizes proteins that accumulate in crystals with insecticidal properties and which has been widely used in the biological control of insects from different orders, including Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, and Diptera. In this review, we summarize all the bacterial proteins, from B. thuringiensis and other entomopathogenic bacteria, which have described insecticidal activity against dipteran pests, including species of medical and agronomic importance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Pivotal Role of Toxins in Insects-Bacteria Interactions)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop