Next Article in Journal
Recent Advances in the Treatment of Insulin Resistance Targeting Molecular and Metabolic Pathways: Fighting a Losing Battle?
Previous Article in Journal
Do Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinomas and ECL-Cell Neuroendocrine Tumours Have a Common Origin?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. Infection in Humans in Latvia: Evidence of Underdiagnosed and Underreported Cases

1
Institute of Food Safety, Animal Health and Environment BIOR, 1076 Riga, Latvia
2
Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, 1004 Riga, Latvia
3
Post-Graduate Study Program in Family Medicine, University of Latvia, 1004 Riga, Latvia
4
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Life Sciences and Technology, 3001 Jelgava, Latvia
5
Faculty of Medicine, Riga Stradiņš University, 1007 Riga, Latvia
6
Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia, 1005 Riga, Latvia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2022, 58(4), 471; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040471
Submission received: 25 February 2022 / Revised: 17 March 2022 / Accepted: 22 March 2022 / Published: 24 March 2022

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Protozoan parasites—Cryptosporidium and Giardia—are important causes of diarrhea with an underestimated short-term burden on childhood growth and wellbeing in children under five years of age. The main transmission routes for both parasites are food and drinking water; transmission from person to person; and, due to their zoonotic nature, from domestic or wild animals to humans. The aims of the present study were to summarize the officially reported human cases of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in Latvia and to assess the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in children within a prospective prevalence study. Materials and Methods: The number of officially reported cases of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in the time period of 2000–2020 was collected from the Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia. Data from a clinical diagnostic laboratory were included in the study in the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. Additionally, a prospective study was performed, and fecal samples were collected from unique 0–17-year-old patients from January to February 2021 and tested using fluorescent microscopy. Results: Overall, during the 20-year period, 71 cases (mean per year = 9) of cryptosporidiosis and 1020 (mean per year = 34) cases of giardiasis were officially reported in Latvia. Meanwhile, within the prospective study, we found 35 (6.0%; 95%CI 4.3–8.1) Cryptosporidium and 42 (7.2%; 95%CI 5.3–9.6) Giardia cases. Conclusions: Here, we provide clear proof that both Cryptosporidium and Giardia are underdiagnosed in Latvia, which could also be true for neighboring Baltic and European countries, where a low number of cases are officially reported. Therefore, we highlight the hypothesis that the actual number of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis human cases in the Baltic states is higher than that officially reported, including in Latvia.

1. Introduction

Protozoan parasites are important causes of diarrhea and other enteric diseases in humans [1]. Cryptosporidium spp. are among the leading causes of moderate-to-severe diarrhea, with an underestimated short-term burden on childhood growth and wellbeing in children under five years of age [2]. Likewise, Giardia duodenalis infects approximately 200 million individuals worldwide and causes acute diarrhea in children under 5 years of age [3]. The epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis is complex. The main transmission routes for Cryptosporidium and Giardia are food and drinking water, but transmission from person to person and, due to the zoonotic nature of these protozoans, from domestic or wild animals to humans may also occur [4]. Foodborne parasites are recognized as significant foodborne pathogens, but they still remain neglected compared with bacterial and viral pathogens. The World Health Organization has included both parasites in the “Neglected Disease Initiative” list since 2004 [5]. Meanwhile, Cryptosporidium spp. and G. duodenalis were ranked as the fifth and seventh most important foodborne parasite in Europe, respectively [6].
The genus Cryptosporidium consists of more than 40 species and an equal number of Cryptosporidium genotypes of unknown species status [7,8,9]. These species have several mammalian and non-mammalian hosts, and cross-infections may occur between various host species [10]. The genus Giardia comprises seven species, including Giardia duodenalis (also referred to as G. intestinalis or G. lamblia), which can infect several hosts, including mammals [11,12]. G. duodenalis is grouped into eight assemblages (from A to H), of which only A and B are infectious to humans, but it can also infect livestock and companion and wild animals, which, in turn, makes Giardia a zoonotic pathogen [13]. The main risk groups for cryptosporidiosis are children and immunocompromised people (e.g., patients with untreated Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), or cancer and transplant patients). Infection in malnourished children—especially children younger than two years of age—is strongly correlated with cognitive dysfunction, stunted physical growth, poor physical fitness, and high mortality [14,15]. Meanwhile, an increased risk for an infection with giardiasis has been associated with immunodeficiency, hypogammaglobulinemia, and isolated immunoglobulin A deficiency [16].
The prevalence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia infection in humans in Nordic countries (Finland, Norway, Sweden, and Denmark) varies between 0.0 and 13.6% for asymptomatic cases and 0.9–10.9% for symptomatic cases of Cryptosporidium, and 2.1–25.8% for asymptomatic cases and 12.6–47.4% for symptomatic cases of Giardia [17]. Both parasites are prevalent in Eastern Europe, but the number of reported cases varies greatly between the investigated countries; the causes of this variation include true differences in exposure and susceptibility; variable provision and access to healthcare systems; and differences in case definition, laboratory diagnosis, the recording of cases, and reporting. The national health systems of Eastern European countries operate differently [18].
Cryptosporidiosis in humans is a notifiable, but most likely underreported and underdiagnosed, disease in the official registers, and surveillance data provide a scarce overview of the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in Latvia [18,19]. The potential reasons for underestimation are that not all patients have severe symptoms and not all patients seek medical care. The symptoms are similar to those caused by bacterial or viral agents and can be misinterpreted; therefore, patients are less likely to be suspected of having Cryptosporidium and/or Giardia infection. Laboratory analysis might fail to detect these parasites because of the low number of excreted (oo)cysts in feces and the inappropriate methods used for routine diagnostics [20]. Thus, subclinical, asymptomatic, and undetected cases may play significant roles in infection transmission and epidemiology in the general population.
The aims of the present study were to summarize the officially reported human cases of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in Latvia and to assess the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in children within a prospective prevalence study.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The number of officially reported cases of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis in the time period of 2000–2020 was collected from the Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia (CDPC) [21]. Additionally, data from a clinical diagnostic laboratory were included in the study, with only unique patients tested for the presence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia with the appropriate methods in the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2018. The use of this data to characterize the epidemiology of an infectious disease presents a unique opportunity to assess the prevalence of infection with minimal cost while allowing for the characterization of occurrence across time. This approach also facilitates the identification of any patterns that this infection might have with respect to patient age, gender, and common comorbidities.
For the prospective study, fecal samples were collected from a clinical diagnostic laboratory in Latvia from unique 0–17-year-old patients. To find out how many children are infected with Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Latvia, we calculated the minimal sample size with OpenEpi v.3.01 [22], assuming that 50% of children are infected to obtain the maximum variability with a 95% confidence level. This established that a minimum of 385 random samples should be collected. Sampling was carried out from January to February 2021, and samples were stored at −20 °C before further analyses. Data about gender, age, and prior diagnostic purposes were collected. Overall, 641 fecal samples were collected.
This study was conducted with the approval of Riga Stradinš University Ethics committee (No. 6-1/13/2020/51).

2.2. Fluorescent Microscopy Analyses

Samples were thawed overnight at +4 °C before further analyses. For flotation with a saturated NaCl solution (relative density 1.18–1.2), 1 g of fecal sample was used, and after the flotation and centrifugation steps, 2 mL of purified material was available for subsequent analyses. For the fluorescent microscopy, 10 μL of the thoroughly suspended purified oocysts was added to the well of a Teflon slide (i.e., a Teflon slide with three 12 mm wells; Immuno-Cell, Mechelen, Germany), dried on the well, and fixed by submerging the slide in methanol for five minutes. The material was stained with FITC-labeled anti-Cryptosporidium/Giardia mAbs (AquaGlo, Waterborne, Inc., New Orleans, LA, USA), and further steps were carried out following the manufacturer’s instructions. For enumeration, brightly stained (oo)cysts with typical morphology were counted in all wells at 200× magnification. Each detected (oo)cyst represents 200 OPG.

2.3. Data Analyses

Patient age was divided into nine groups: <1 year; 1–6 years; 7–14 years; 15–17 years; 18–24 years; 30–39 years; 40–49 years; 50–59 years; and >60 years.
To calculate the confidence limits for point estimate proportions (e.g., proportion of Cryptosporidium- and Giardia-infected patients per age group and per different sex), both in retrospective and prospective studies, we assumed a binomial distribution, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the Mid-p Exact of the open-source software OpenEpi v.2.3.1 [22]. Two-tailed p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Long-Term Data on Officially Reported Cryptosporidiosis and Giardiasis Cases in Latvia

Overall, during the 20-year period, 71 cases of cryptosporidiosis and 1020 cases of giardiasis were reported to CDPC. A significantly higher (p < 0.05) proportion of cryptosporidiosis cases were reported in the age group of 30–39 years (33.8%; 95%CI 31.7–57.8) (Figure 1). However, in the case of giardiasis, a significantly higher (p < 0.05) proportion of cases were reported in the age groups of 1–6 years (9.0; 95%CI 7.4–11.0) and 7–14 years (14.1; 95%CI 12.1–16.4) from all reported cases (Figure 2).
In total, data from 18.367 unique patients, who were tested for Giardia antigen presence from 2008 to 2018 in a clinical diagnostic laboratory, were included in the present study. Patient age ranged from 0 to 96 years (mean = 30.7, median = 31.0), and 60.4% (n = 11.097) of them were females and 38.4% (n = 7056) were males. Some data were missing regarding the gender of the patients. The overall proportion of Giardia-infected patients was 2.2% (95%CI 2.0–2.4), and there were no significant differences between the age groups. A significantly higher (p = 0.02) proportion of females (1.9%; 95%CI 1.6–2.1) were infected with Giardia compared to males (2.4%; 95%CI 2.0–2.8). The number of diagnosed cases per year in this laboratory made up a range from 11.1 to 86.4% of officially reported cases per year to CDPC, with the exception of the year 2012, when more Giardia cases (n = 22) were diagnosed than officially reported to CDPC (n = 17). Meanwhile, during the time period 2008–2018, there were no samples tested for the presence of Cryptosporidium in this specific clinical diagnostic laboratory.

3.2. Cryptosporidium/Giardia Presence in Children within the Prospective Study

Overall, 584 samples were suitable for analyses. Patients ranged in age from 22 days to 17 years (mean = 4.6 and median = 3.0), and 45.9% (n = 268) were females and 54.1% (n = 316) were males. The fecal samples were submitted to the clinical laboratory for the following analyses: coprogram (79.1%), endoparasite detection with a concentration technique (42.6%), different bacteriological analyses (4.8%), calprotectin (1.5%), and occult blood (0.7%) for a single analysis or different analysis combinations.
There was no significant difference (p = 0.2) between the proportion of Cryptosporidium oocysts (6.0%; 95%CI 4.3–8.1) and Giardia cysts (7.2%; 95%CI 5.3–9.6) in the infected children. No significant (p > 0.05) differences were observed between the proportion of infected children with Cryptosporidium in different age groups (Table 1). Meanwhile, a significantly (p = 0.04) lower proportion of Giardia-infected children were observed in the age group of less than one year, and a significantly higher proportion (p = 0.04) were observed in the age group of 15–17 years (Table 1). There were no significant differences in the proportion of infected children between sexes for both parasites.
Infection with both parasites was observed in five children (1.3%; 95%CI 0.5–2.9): two were males and three were females; three were from the age group of 1–6 years, one was from the age group of 7–14 years, and one was from the age group of 15–17 years.

4. Discussion

Here, we provide clear proof that both Cryptosporidium and Giardia are underdiagnosed in Latvia. Within the present prospective study in children alone, we found 35 Cryptosporidium and 42 Giardia cases, while in the year 2021 (from January to November), there were 2 and 35 cases officially reported in Latvia, respectively [21] (www.spkc.gov.lv). Similar results could be found in neighboring Baltic and European countries, where a low number of cases are officially reported, despite Cryptosporidium and Giardia being a notifiable disease in humans [18,19]. In the year 2020, there were 5 officially reported cases of cryptosporidiosis and 86 cases of giardiasis in Estonia; there were no officially reported cases of cryptosporidiosis and 11 cases of giardiasis in Lithuania [23].
In most countries, surveillance in humans is passive, and countries only report diagnosed patients with clinical symptoms or hospitalized cases [19]. In Latvia, hospitalized patients, both adults and children, expressing gastrointestinal symptoms are primarily tested for viral (rotavirus, adenovirus, norovirus, etc.) and bacterial pathogens (Salmonella, Shigella, Campylobacter, Yersinia, etc.). Testing is initiated for parasites, including Cryptosporidium and Giardia, only when viral and bacterial pathogens are excluded. According to the handbook available for Latvian physicians, Cryptosporidium and Giardia should be considered in the following conditions: only in cases of chronic diarrhea (longer than 14 days); in cases of immunosuppressed patients with HIV/AIDS; and in cases where the patient has recently travelled to a country with a warmer climate [24]. Unlike Cryptosporidium, testing is state funded for the previously mentioned viruses, bacteria, and Giardia (National Health Service, www.vmnvd.gov.lv). Similar conditions for the primary testing of bacteria and viruses are mentioned in Finland [25].
One of the predisposing factors for the spread of Cryptosporidium and Giardia is the climate in the Baltic region, with its frequent rain and floods. Observations have provided an estimate (for the past 30 years) of mean annual precipitation of 750 mm/year for the entire Baltic Sea basin, including both land and sea [26]. A humid environment could lead to the massive spread of Cryptosporidium and Giardia [27].
Cryptosporidium and Giardia are highly successful parasites due to their large host range, high (oo)cyst output from infected individuals, waterborne and foodborne transmission routes, and low infectious dose. The latest modeling studies have shown a significant risk of infection with Cryptosporidium from as low as 1 oocyst, while a Giardia infectious dose can be as low as 10 cysts [28,29]. Due to their capacity for survival in the environment and zoonotic dispersal, these parasites can pose a significant risk to public health, especially through contaminated drinking water and public swimming pools.
Data on the epidemiology and the zoonotic potential of Cryptosporidium and Giardia shed by animals and circulating in the Baltic states, including Latvia, are scarce. Surveillance data in livestock show that Cryptosporidium spp. herd prevalence ranges from 66% in Estonia to 72.4% in Latvia and 100% in Lithuania [30,31,32]. There are limited studies of the presence of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in other animal species [18]. The results in the present study provide evidence that Cryptosporidium and Giardia are widely present in the environment of the Baltic states. Cryptosporidium oocysts are robust and extremely resistant to chemical disinfection (chlorine), and oocysts can also survive for several months in water and soil [33,34], while Giardia is more susceptible to environmental conditions [35]. Based on this, we highlight the hypothesis that the actual number of cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis human cases in the Baltic states is higher than that officially reported, including in Latvia.
We provide data that estimate the importance and the risk to public health caused by Cryptosporidium and Giardia in Latvia. Both parasites can cause significant morbidity with low infective doses, even for fully immunocompetent persons, but especially for young, old, pregnant, and immunocompromised persons [10]. The spread of the pathogens in children is due to poor hygiene and a lack of understanding of hygiene, as children tend to rarely wash their hands appropriately after restroom use and before meals [36].

5. Conclusions

Cryptosporidiosis and giardiasis are considered as possible causal agents in the case of long-lasting watery diarrhea combined with abdominal cramps, and fecal samples should be tested for Cryptosporidium and Giardia at the same time as when testing is performed for bacteria and viruses. We still lack information regarding infection routes and animal hosts; therefore, further studies on these pathogens will be conducted to better understand the epidemiology and parasite diversity in Latvia. Further parasite prevalence studies in animal populations and molecular epidemiology studies will improve the knowledge of the main Cryptosporidium and Giardia transmission routes from animals (such as pets, wild animals, and livestock) through the environment (water, sewage, and soil) to humans.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, G.D., M.M. and A.K. (Angelika Krūmiņa); methodology, G.D., M.M. and A.K. (Angelika Krūmiņa); formal analysis, A.K. (Agris Krūmiņš); investigation, V.M. and D.P.Š.; resources, A.K. (Agris Krūmiņš), R.K. and A.B.; data curation, A.K. (Agris Krūmiņš) and M.M.; writing—original draft preparation, G.D. and M.M.; writing—review and editing, A.K. (Agris Krūmiņš), V.M.; D.P.Š., L.V. and A.K. (Agris Krūmiņš); visualization, G.D.; supervision, L.V. and A.K. (Angelika Krūmiņa); project administration, G.D.; funding acquisition, G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Fundamental and applied research “Transmission of Foodborne Parasitic pathogen from animals to humans: TRANSPAR” (lzp-2021/1-0055) and financed by the Ministry of Education and Science, Latvia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Ethics Committee of Riga Stradiņš University (No. 6-1/13/2020/51, 17.12.2020).

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived as the subjects are not identifiable.

Data Availability Statement

The analyzed data sets supporting the results are partly available on www.spkc.gov.lv (accessed on 20 January 2022).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Sandra Dimante and Ilze Lindeberga from E. Gulbja Laboratory for their involvement in the study with data sharing. We also would like to thank Zanda Ozoliņa and Marta Linde for their practical involvement in the present study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Custodio, H. Protozoan parasites. Pediatr. Rev. 2016, 37, 59–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Khalil, I.A.; Troeger, C.; Rao, P.C.; Blacker, B.F.; Brown, A.; Brewer, T.G.; Colombara, D.V.; De Hostos, E.L.; Engmann, C.; Guerrant, R.L.; et al. Morbidity, mortality, and long-term consequences associated with diarrhoea from Cryptosporidium infection in children younger than 5 years: A meta-analyses study. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e758–e768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Kotloff, K.L.; Nataro, J.P.; Blackwelder, W.C.; Nasrin, D.; Farag, T.H.; Panchalingam, S.; Wu, Y.; Sow, S.O.; Sur, D.; Breiman, R.F.; et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): A prospective, case-control study. Lancet 2013, 382, 209–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Cacciò, S.M.; Thompson, R.A.; McLauchlin, J.; Smith, H.V. Unravelling Cryptosporidium and Giardia epidemiology. Trends Parasitol. 2005, 21, 430–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Savioli, L.; Smith, H.; Thompson, A. Giardia and Cryptosporidium join the ‘neglected diseases initiative’. Trends Parasitol. 2006, 22, 203–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bouwknegt, M.; Devleesschauwer, B.; Graham, H.; Robertson, L.J.; van der Giessen, J.W. Prioritisation of food-borne parasites in Europe, 2016. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, 17–00161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Feng, Y.; Ryan, U.M.; Xiao, L. Genetic diversity and population structure of Cryptosporidium. Trends Parasitol. 2018, 34, 997–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bolland, S.J.; Zahedi, A.; Oskam, C.; Murphy, B.; Ryan, U. Cryptosporidium bollandi n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiiae) from angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) and Oscar fish (Astronotus ocellatus). Exp. Parasitol. 2020, 217, 107956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Holubová, N.; Tůmová, L.; Sak, B.; Hejzlarová, A.; Konečný, R.; McEvoy, J.; Kváč, M. Description of Cryptosporidium ornithophilus n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in farmed ostriches. Parasites Vectors 2020, 13, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dillingham, R.A.; Lima, A.A.; Guerrant, R.L. Cryptosporidiosis: Epidemiology and impact. Microbes Infect. 2002, 4, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thompson, R.A.; Monis, P. Giardia—From genome to proteome. Adv. Parasitol. 2012, 78, 57–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hillman, A.; Ash, A.; Elliot, A.; Lymbery, A.; Perez, C.; Thompson, R.A. Confirmation of a unique species of Giardia, parasitic in the quenda (Isoodon obesulus). Int. J. Parasitol. Parasites Wildl. 2016, 5, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Cacciò, S.M.; Lalle, M.; Svärd, S.G. Host specificity in the Giardia duodenalis species complex. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2018, 66, 335–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mmbaga, B.T.; Houpt, E.R. Cryptosporidium and Giardia Infections in Children: A Review. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2017, 64, 837–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Desai, N.T.; Sarkar, R.; Kang, G. Cryptosporidiosis: An under-recognized public health problem. Trop. Parasitol. 2012, 2, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Rodney, D.A. Hunter’s Tropical Medicine and Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10th ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2020; pp. 707–711. [Google Scholar]
  17. Hörman, A.; Korpela, H.; Sutinen, J.; Wedel, H.; Hänninen, M.L. Meta-analysis in assessment of the prevalence and annual incidence of Giardia spp. and Cryptosporidium spp. infections in humans in the Nordic countries. Int. J. Parasitol. 2004, 34, 1337–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Plutzer, J.; Lassen, B.; Jokelainen, P.; Djurković-Djaković, O.; Kucsera, I.; Dorbek-Kolin, E.; Šoba, B.; Sréter, T.; Imre, K.; Omeragić, J.; et al. Review of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in the eastern part of Europe, 2016. Eurosurveillance 2018, 23, 16–00825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. van der Giessen, J.; Deksne, G.; Gómez-Morales, M.A.; Troell, K.; Gomes, J.; Sotiraki, S.; Rozycki, M.; Kucsera, I.; Djurković-Djaković, O.; Robertson, L.J. Surveillance of foodborne parasitic diseases in Europe in a One Health approach. Parasite Epidemiol. Control 2021, 13, e00205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. O’Leary, J.K.; Sleator, R.D.; Lucey, B. Cryptosporidium spp. diagnosis and research in the 21st century. Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2021, 24, e00131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia. Available online: www.spkc.gov.lv (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  22. Dean, A.G.; Sullivan, K.M.; Soe, M.M. OpenEpi: Open Source Epidemiologic Statistics for Public Health, Version. Available online: www.OpenEpi.com (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  23. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Available online: http://atlas.ecdc.europa.eu/public/index.aspx (accessed on 31 January 2022).
  24. Mazjānis, I.; Tirāns, E. Infectious Diseases. Handbook, 2nd ed.; Autorkolektīvs: Riga, Latvia, 2006; p. 1008. (In Latvian) [Google Scholar]
  25. Åberg, R.; Sjöman, M.; Hemminki, K.; Pirnes, A.; Räsänen, S.; Kalanti, A.; Pohjanvirta, T.; Cacció, S.M.; Pihlajasaari, A.; Toikkanen, S.; et al. Cryptosporidium parvum caused a large outbreak linked to frisée salad in Finland, 2012. Zoonoses Public Health 2015, 62, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Helsinki Commission: Climate Change in the Baltic Sea Area—HELCOM Thematic Assessment in 2007; Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings No 111. 2007. Available online: https://www.baltex-research.eu/BACC/material/Climate_change_report_07.pdf (accessed on 20 January 2022).
  27. Gertler, M.; Dürr, M.; Renner, P.; Poppert, S.; Askar, M.; Breidenbach, J.; Frank, C.; Preußel, K.; Schielke, A.; Werber, D.; et al. Outbreak of Cryptosporidium hominis following river flooding in the city of Halle (Saale), Germany, August 2013. BMC Infect. Dis. 2015, 15, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  28. Messner, M.J.; Berger, P. Cryptosporidium infection risk: Results of new dose-response modeling. Risk Anal. 2016, 36, 1969–1982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Coffey, C.M.; Collier, S.A.; Gleason, M.E.; Yoder, J.S.; Kirk, M.D.; Richardson, A.M.; Fullerton, K.; Benedict, K.M. Evolving Epidemiology of Reported Giardiasis Cases in the United States, 1995–2016. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2021, 72, 764–770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lassen, B.; Järvis, T. Eimeria and Cryptosporidium in Lithuanian cattle farms. Vet. Med. Zoot. 2009, 48, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  31. Santoro, A.; Dorbek-Kolin, E.; Jeremejeva, J.; Tummeleht, L.; Orro, T.; Jokelainen, P.; Lassen, B. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium spp. in calves in Estonia: High prevalence of Cryptosporidium parvum shedding and 10 subtypes identified. Parasitology 2019, 146, 261–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Deksne, G.; Mateusa, M.; Cvetkova, S.; Derbakova, A.; Keidāne, D.; Troell, K.; Schares, G. Prevalence, risk factor and diversity of Cryptosporidium in cattle in Latvia. Vet. Parasitol. Reg. Stud. Rep. 2022, 28, 100677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Robertson, L.J.; Campbell, A.T.; Smith, H.V. Survival of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts under various environmental pressures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 3494–3500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. King, B.J.; Monis, P.T. Critical processes affecting Cryptosporidium oocyst survival in the environment. Parasitology 2007, 134, 309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Olson, M.E.; Goh, J.; Phillips, M.; Guselle, N.; McAllister, T.A. Giardia cyst and Cryptosporidium oocyst survival in water, soil, and cattle feces. J. Environ. Qual. 1999, 28, 1991–1996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Enserink, R.; van den Wijngaard, C.; Bruijning-Verhagen, P.; van Asten, L.; Mughini-Gras, L.; Duizer, E.; Kortbeek, T.; Scholts, R.; Nagelkerke, N.; Smit, H.A.; et al. Gastroenteritis attributable to 16 enteropathogens in children attending day care: Significant effects of rotavirus, norovirus, astrovirus, Cryptosporidium and Giardia. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2015, 34, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Proportion with 95% confidence interval of officially reported cryptosporidiosis cases per age group over the time period from 2000 to 2020 in Latvia.
Figure 1. Proportion with 95% confidence interval of officially reported cryptosporidiosis cases per age group over the time period from 2000 to 2020 in Latvia.
Medicina 58 00471 g001
Figure 2. Proportion with 95% confidence interval of officially reported giardiasis cases per age group over the time period from 2000 to 2020 in Latvia.
Figure 2. Proportion with 95% confidence interval of officially reported giardiasis cases per age group over the time period from 2000 to 2020 in Latvia.
Medicina 58 00471 g002
Table 1. Number of analyzed, infected, and proportion with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of children with Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in different age and sex groups.
Table 1. Number of analyzed, infected, and proportion with 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of children with Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. in different age and sex groups.
FactorNot AnalyzedCryptosporidium spp.Giardia spp.
No. of InfectedProportion, %No. of InfectedProportion, %
(95% CI)(95% CI)
Age group<112343.3 (1.0–8.3)32.4 (0.5–7.2)
1–6 313227.0 (4.6–10.5)237.3 (4.9–10.8)
6–1410865.6 (2.3–11.8)87.4 (3.6–14.1)
15–174037.5 (1.9–20.6)820 (10.2–35.0)
GenderFemale268114.1 (2.2–7.3)238.6 (5.7–12.6)
Male316247.6 (5.1–11.1)196.0 (3.8–9.3)
Total584356.0 (4.3–8.1)427.2 (5.3–9.6)
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Deksne, G.; Krūmiņš, A.; Mateusa, M.; Morozovs, V.; Šveisberga, D.P.; Korotinska, R.; Bormane, A.; Vīksna, L.; Krūmiņa, A. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. Infection in Humans in Latvia: Evidence of Underdiagnosed and Underreported Cases. Medicina 2022, 58, 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040471

AMA Style

Deksne G, Krūmiņš A, Mateusa M, Morozovs V, Šveisberga DP, Korotinska R, Bormane A, Vīksna L, Krūmiņa A. Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. Infection in Humans in Latvia: Evidence of Underdiagnosed and Underreported Cases. Medicina. 2022; 58(4):471. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Deksne, Gunita, Agris Krūmiņš, Maira Mateusa, Vladimirs Morozovs, Dārta Paula Šveisberga, Rita Korotinska, Antra Bormane, Ludmila Vīksna, and Angelika Krūmiņa. 2022. "Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. Infection in Humans in Latvia: Evidence of Underdiagnosed and Underreported Cases" Medicina 58, no. 4: 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040471

APA Style

Deksne, G., Krūmiņš, A., Mateusa, M., Morozovs, V., Šveisberga, D. P., Korotinska, R., Bormane, A., Vīksna, L., & Krūmiņa, A. (2022). Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp. Infection in Humans in Latvia: Evidence of Underdiagnosed and Underreported Cases. Medicina, 58(4), 471. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58040471

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop