Search Results (69)

Objectives: To determine the prescribing prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)- and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in Greece and examine patterns of first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) utilization and associated treatment costs using nationwide real-world data. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the national e-prescription database was performed, identifying patients initiating first-line treatment (FLT) for EGFR- or ALK-positive NSCLC between 1 January 2020 and 31 December 2022. Demographic characteristics, prescribing prevalence data, drug utilization patterns, total annual drug expenditures, and per patient treatment costs were assessed. All statistical analyses were performed using the statistical software SPSS-v.29. Results: Overall, 1188 EGFR-positive (mean age of 70.93 ± 11.6) and 246 (mean age of 64.26 ± 12.6) ALK-positive NSCLC patients initiated FLT during the three-year study period. EGFR mutations were slightly more common in females (53%), peaking in the 70–79 age group (35%). ALK mutations were also more common among females (52%), particularly within the 60–79 age group. In EGFR-positive patients, osimertinib usage markedly increased from 41% in 2020 to 63% in 2022, primarily displacing afatinib (from 32% to 22%) and erlotinib (from 24% to 14%), with gefitinib prescriptions falling below 2%. Among ALK-positive patients, crizotinib utilization declined significantly from 60% to 16%, whereas alectinib increased to 59% by 2022. Annual EGFR-related total drug expenditures remained stable (€11.5 million in 2020 vs. €11.9 million in 2022), driven primarily by increasing osimertinib usage. Similarly, ALK-related annual drug expenditures showed stability, with costs predominantly attributed to rising alectinib utilization. Conclusions: This nationwide analysis highlights the rapid adoption of second- and third-generation TKIs for EGFR- and ALK-positive NSCLC in Greece, reflecting evolving clinical practice patterns. Although the target patient populations are relatively small, the associated economic burden is considerable. To ensure long-term sustainability of the Greek healthcare system, policymakers should critically assess the cost-effectiveness of these innovative therapies and align resource allocation with value-based care principles. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are rare neoplasms with low metastatic potential but a high recurrence rate. Approximately 60–80% of IMTs harbor anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangements, making ALK inhibitors (ALKis) a key therapeutic option. However, resistance to ALKis remains a significant clinical challenge, necessitating alternative treatment strategies. Case Presentation: We report the case of a 23-year-old woman diagnosed with a metastatic TPM3::ALK fusion-positive IMT, initially managed with crizotinib and ceritinib. Disease progression prompted a switch to alectinib, followed by lorlatinib in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab + ipilimumab). The patient tolerated this regimen well, with manageable side effects, and has remained progression-free for over three years, demonstrating the potential efficacy of ALK-ICI combination therapy. Conclusions: This case highlights the rapid development of resistance to first- and second-generation ALKis and the emerging role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in IMT treatment. PD-L1 expression in ALK-positive IMTs suggests an immune escape mechanism, supporting combination ALK-ICI therapy as a viable approach. The successful long-term disease control achieved in this case underscores the importance of molecular profiling in guiding personalized treatment strategies for IMT. This report contributes to the growing body of evidence supporting precision medicine and immunotherapy in rare sarcomas. Full article

Background/Objectives: Alectinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), exhibits suboptimal oral bioavailability, primarily attributable to its inherently low aqueous solubility and limited dissolution kinetics. This study aimed to enhance Alectinib’s solubility and therapeutic efficacy by formulating a G4-NH2-PAMAM dendrimer complex. Methods: The complex was prepared using the organic solvent evaporation method and characterized by DSC, FTIR, dynamic light scattering (DLS), and zeta potential measurements. A validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method quantified the Alectinib. In vitro drug release studies compared free Alectinib with the G4-NH2-PAMAM dendrimer complex. Cytotoxicity against NSCLC cell line A549 was assessed using MTT assays, clonogenic assay, and scratch-wound assay. Xenograft effect was investigated in the H460 lung cell line. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated in rats using LC–MS/MS. Results: Alectinib exhibited an encapsulation efficiency of 59 ± 5%. In vitro release studies demonstrated sustained drug release at pH 6.8 and faster degradation at pH 2.5. Anticancer activity in vitro showed comparable efficacy to free Alectinib, with 98% migration inhibition. In vivo tumor suppression studies revealed near-complete tumor regression (~100%) after 17 days of treatment, compared to 75% with free Alectinib. Pharmacokinetic analysis indicated enhanced absorption (shorter Tmax), prolonged systemic circulation (longer half-life), and higher bioavailability (increased AUC) for the dendrimer-complexed drug. Conclusions: These findings suggest that the G4-NH2-PAMAM dendrimer system significantly improves Alectinib’s pharmacokinetics and therapeutic potential, making it a promising approach for NSCLC treatment. Full article

Background/Objectives: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) constitutes over 84% of all lung cancer cases and is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, is effective in ALK-positive NSCLC; however, its clinical potential is hampered by poor aqueous solubility and limited oral bioavailability. This study aimed to develop Alectinib-loaded chitosan–alginate nanoparticles (ACANPs) to enhance its solubility, oral bioavailability, and therapeutic efficacy. Methods: ACANPs were synthesized using a novel combined solid/oil/water (s/o/w) emulsification technique with ionotropic gelation. Characterization was performed using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), dynamic light scattering (DLS), and zeta potential measurements. A validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method quantified the Alectinib. In vitro drug release studies compared free Alectinib with ACANPs. Cytotoxicity against NSCLC cell lines (A549 and H460) was assessed using MTT assays. Pharmacokinetic parameters were evaluated in rats using LC–MS/MS. Results: ACANPs showed a high encapsulation efficiency (~97%), an average particle size of 161 nm, and a positive zeta potential of +21 mV. In vitro release studies revealed a threefold increase in drug release from ACANPs over 48 h compared to free Alectinib. Cytotoxicity assays demonstrated significantly reduced IC₅₀ values for ACANPs. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed an enhanced maximum plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the curve (AUC), indicating a 78% increase in oral bioavailability. Conclusions: ACANPs substantially improved the solubility, cytotoxic efficacy, and oral bioavailability of Alectinib, suggesting their potential as a promising nanocarrier system for enhancing NSCLC treatment outcomes. Full article

Introduction: The use of ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) and ROS1 (ROS1 protoncogene) inhibitors are the standard of care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangements (approximately 5.5% of patients). Three generations of inhibitors are available, but there is no direct comparison of their efficacy in homogeneous Caucasian populations in real-world practice. In this retrospective study, we compare the efficacy of crizotinib, brigatinib, and alectinib in NSCLC patients with different clinical courses of the disease. Materials and Methods: One hundred four NSCLC patients with ALK or ROS1 gene rearrangement were enrolled for first-line therapy with ALK inhibitors (crizotinib in 25 patients, brigatinib in 22 patients, and alectinib in 41 patients) or the ROS1 inhibitor (crizotinib in 16 patients) as part of daily clinical practice in two Polish cancer centers. Overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared according to treatment methods and clinical data. Results: In ALK-rearranged patients, ORR was insignificantly higher in patients treated with second-generation ALK inhibitors than in patients receiving crizotinib (68.25% vs. 48% of patients, p = 0.0547). Median PFS in the crizotinib group was 8 months, and in the group that received second-generation ALK inhibitors this was not reached (HR = 5.2182, 95% CI: 2.6163–10.4079, p < 0.0001). Similarly, median OS was significantly lower in patients treated with crizotinib than in patients receiving second-generation ALK inhibitors (26 vs. not reached, HR = 3.529, 95% CI: 1.5559–7.2258, p = 0.002). The efficacy of crizotinib in patients with ROS1 and ALK gene rearrangement did not differ significantly (ORR—37.5 vs. 48%, median PFS—6 vs. 7 months, median OS—8 vs. 26 months, respectively). In ALK-rearranged patients, multivariate analysis showed that the only factor significantly increasing the risk of progression was liver metastases (HR = 2.1917, p = 0.0418). The risk of death was significantly higher in patients treated with crizotinib (HR = 2.4823, p = 0.0359) and in patients with liver metastases (HR = 3.1266, p = 0.0104). Conclusions: Second-generation ALK inhibitors are more effective than crizotinib in ALK-rearranged patients. Liver metastases, but not brain metastases, are the main clinical factors shortening PFS and OS in NSCLC patients treated with ALK inhibitors. Full article

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) have become first-line therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK rearrangements. This study investigates ALK-TKI-associated adverse events (AEs), focusing on identifying hepatotoxicity signals and previously undocumented safety concerns. Using disproportionality analysis of 56,864 reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, we systematically classified AEs via the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). At the System Organ Class (SOC) level, crizotinib exhibited a significantly stronger signal for eye disorders, ceritinib was uniquely linked to gastrointestinal disorders, and loratinib was predominantly associated with metabolism and nutrition disorders. Several AEs previously undocumented in drug labels were identified, including pericardial effusion, elevated C-reactive protein, hemolytic anemia, hemoptysis, and decreased hemoglobin. Furthermore, crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib were significantly associated with hepatotoxicity, marked by elevated alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and hepatic enzyme levels. These findings highlight the need for vigilant monitoring of unlabeled AEs and potential label updates, particularly for hepatotoxicity risks associated with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib. Full article

Background: Approximately 25–30% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients are diagnosed when the disease is still resectable, although the risk of recurrence is significant. Recently, approaches based on targeted agents or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have modified the management of such patients. However, some questions remain unanswered. Objectives: Our aim is to assess the current evidence on approaches involving targeted agents and ICIs in resectable NSCLC, to provide an up-to-date overview of the subject, and to identify areas of current debate, Methods: We analyzed randomized trials on ICIs and targeted therapies in early-stage NSCLC, published or presented at international oncology meetings throughout the last 5 years. Results: Osimertinib and alectinib have shown robust results in the adjuvant setting for molecularly identified patient subgroups, while ICIs have achieved robust data in the neoadjuvant/perioperative setting, with less consistent data on the pure adjuvant approach. Circulating tumor DNA levels may offer a possible biomarker for therapeutic decisions, albeit more prospective data are needed. Conclusions: Targeted agents and ICIs are revolutionizing early-stage NSCLC, similarly to what was observed in advanced disease. Prospective studies designed to compare neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and perioperative approaches and to assess the role of circulating biomarkers are warranted. Full article

The treatment landscape for patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC has rapidly evolved following the approval of several ALK TKIs in Canada. However, public funding of ALK TKIs is mostly limited to the first line treatment setting. Using linked provincial health administrative databases, we examined real-world outcomes of patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC receiving ALK TKIs in Ontario between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2021. Demographic, clinical characteristics and treatment patterns were summarized using descriptive statistics. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) among the treatment groups. A total of 413 patients were identified. Patients were administered alectinib (n = 154), crizotinib (n = 80), or palliative-intent chemotherapy (n = 55) in the first-line treatment. There was a significant difference in first-line PFS between the treatment groups. The median PFS (mPFS) was not reached for alectinib (95% CI, 568 days—not reached), compared to 8.2 months (95% CI, 171–294 days) for crizotinib (HR = 0.34, p < 0.0001) and 2.4 months (95% CI, 65–100 days) for chemotherapy (HR = 0.14, p < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in first-line OS between the treatment groups. In patients who received more than one line of treatment, there was a significant difference in mOS between patients who received two or more lines of ALK TKIs compared to those who received one line of ALK TKI (mOS = 55 months (95% CI, 400–987 days) and 26 months (95% CI, 1448–2644 days), respectively, HR = 4.64, p < 0.0001). This study confirms the effectiveness of ALK TKIs in real-world practice and supports the potential benefit of multiple lines of ALK TKI on overall survival in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. Full article

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a predominant cause of oncological mortality in the United Kingdom. There is a diverse spectrum of therapeutic options available, such as chemotherapies, targeted therapies and immunotherapies, which have significantly advanced patient prognoses. However, despite these advancements, there is an escalating concern regarding the potential cardiotoxic effects associated with these treatments. Objectives: This study aimed to explore the association between non-small cell lung cancer treatments and cardiotoxicity. Methods: A pharmacovigilance study was conducted utilising the UK Yellow Card System. The proportional reporting ratio (PRR) and reporting odds ratio (ROR) were calculated to detect signals. Results: Among the 56 shortlisted NSCLC drugs, the total number of adverse events reported was 128,214 with 6133 reports being cardiovascular adverse reactions. Among all the drugs analysed, alectinib demonstrated the highest ROR and PRR values, indicating the strongest signal for potential cardiovascular adverse events. Conclusions: This result was comparable to previous studies which also detected a signal of alectinib related to cardiovascular events using the WHO pharmacovigilance database, VigiBase. However, clinical studies demonstrated that alectinib largely improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in patients. Therefore, it is important to continue monitoring the real-world use of alectinib, so that a benefit–risk balance can be maintained. Full article

Background: This study aimed to provide a comprehensive analysis of 56 patients admitted to the Lung Cancer Clinical Care Center (C3) at Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá (FSFB) between 2 May 2022 and 22 April 2024. The focus was on demographic characteristics, smoking history, comorbidities, lung cancer types, TNM classification, treatment modalities, and outcomes. Methods: This observational case series study reviewed medical records and included patients over 18 years with a confirmed diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data were collected and analyzed for demographics, comorbidities, treatment types, biomolecular profiling, and survival rates. Ethical approval was obtained, and data were anonymized. Results: The mean age was 71.8 years with a female predominance (53.6%). A history of smoking was present in 71.4% of patients. Adenocarcinoma was the most common type (75.0%), followed by squamous cell carcinoma (19.6%). At admission, the most frequent TNM stages were IA2 (17.9%) and IVA (16.1%). One-year survival was 68.8%, and 94.3% of stage I–IIIA patients underwent PET scans. Biomolecular profiling revealed 69.2% non-mutated EGFR, 90.4% ALK-negative, and various PDL-1 expression levels. Immunotherapy was received by 91.4% of patients, with Alectinib and Osimertinib being common. Grade III–IV pneumonitis occurred in 5.4% of patients. Conclusions: The study’s findings align with existing literature, highlighting significant smoking history, common adenocarcinoma, and substantial use of immunotherapy. Limitations include the observational design, small sample size, and short follow-up period, impacting the generalizability and long-term outcome assessment. Future research should address these limitations and explore longitudinal outcomes and emerging therapies. Full article

The ever-growing knowledge regarding NSCLC molecular biology has brought innovative therapies into clinical practice; however, the treatment situation in the non-metastatic setting is rapidly evolving. Indeed, immunotherapy-based perioperative treatments are currently considered the standard of care for patients with resectable NSCLC in the absence of EGFR mutations or ALK gene rearrangements. Recently, data have been presented on the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in the adjuvant and locally advanced setting for patients with NSCLC harboring such driver gene alterations. The aim of the current work is to review the available evidence on the use of targeted treatments in the non-metastatic setting, together with a summary of the ongoing trials designed for actionable gene alterations other than EGFR and ALK. To date, 3-year adjuvant osimertinib treatment has been demonstrated to improve DFS and OS and to reduce CNS recurrence in resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC in stage IB–IIIA (TNM 7th edition). The use of osimertinib after chemo-radiation in stage III unresectable EGFR-mutated NSCLC showed the relevant PFS improvement. In the ALK-positive setting, 2-year alectinib treatment was shown to clearly improve DFS compared to adjuvant standard chemotherapy in resected NSCLC with stage IB (≥4 cm)–IIIA (TNM 7th edition). Several trials are ongoing to establish the optimal adjuvant TKI treatment duration, as well as neoadjuvant TKI strategies in EGFR- and ALK-positive disease, and (neo)adjuvant targeted treatments in patients with actionable gene alterations other than EGFR or ALK. In conclusion, our review depicts how the current treatment scenario is expected to rapidly change in the context of non-metastatic NSCLC with actionable gene alterations, hence appropriate molecular testing from the early stages has become crucial to establish the most adequate approaches both in the perioperative and the locally advanced disease. Full article

The recent advent of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has dramatically modified treatment strategies by improving the prognosis in this setting. Osimertinib and alectinib, both TKIs, have shown significant improvements in outcomes for patients with resected EGFR- and ALK-positive NSCLC, respectively, changing the standard of care in these subgroups. More recently, the LAURA trial showed the efficacy of osimertinib after chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. Numerous trials are still ongoing to investigate neoadjuvant/perioperative TKIs in several oncogene-driven NSCLC. In addition, several ICBs have been tested and approved as adjuvant (atezolizumab and pembrolizumab), neoadjuvant (nivolumab), and perioperative treatments (pembrolizumab) for patients with resectable early-stage NSCLC. Despite these advances, many challenges remain regarding the use of TKIs and ICBs in this setting, including the optimal duration of adjuvant TKI or induction ICB therapy, the role of minimal residual disease to identify patients at high-risk of disease relapse and to guide adjuvant treatment decisions, and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in resected oncogene-driven NSCLC. Furthermore, potential predictive biomarkers for efficacy are needed to eventually intensify the entire perioperative strategies. This review aims to summarize and discuss the available evidence, the ongoing trials, and the challenges associated with TKI- and ICB-based approaches in early-stage NSCLC. Full article

Background: Targeted therapies changed the treatment of advanced oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer and could also improve outcomes in resectable disease. Results: The ALINA trial evaluated the clinical benefit of adjuvant alectinib compared with standard chemotherapy and met the primary endpoint with a significant increase in disease-free survival at 2 years among anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive patients with stage IB-IIIA disease; two phase II trials (ALNEO and NAUTIKA1) are currently evaluating perioperative treatment with alectinib, and the results of the case reports published to date are encouraging. Conclusion: In resectable anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive lung cancer, adjuvant alectinib represents the new standard of care and could soon be used in perioperative treatment. Full article

Various next-generation ALK TKIs are available as first-line options for ALK-positive NSCLC, with alectinib and lorlatinib being commonly preferred. However, no direct comparison between them has been conducted, making it impossible to pick a winner. We performed an analytic, ‘non-comparative’ assessment of the two phase 3 pivotal clinical trials showing superiority of alectinib (ALEX) and lorlatinib (CROWN) in comparison to crizotinib. Overall, the two studies were very similar in the study design and patient characteristics, with the exception of the selection and evaluation of brain metastases. PFS hazard ratios numerically favored lorlatinib, both according to the investigator and to BICR. Notably, the 3-year PFS rate was numerically higher with lorlatinib (64%) than with alectinib (46.4%). Despite similar response rates and overall intracranial response, the rate of complete intracranial response was higher with lorlatinib, with a cumulative incidence risk of CNS disease progression at 12 months of 9.4% with alectinib and 2.8% with lorlatinib. The peculiar toxicities of lorlatinib were related to lipidic profile alterations, peripheral oedema and cognitive effects, with no impact on cardiovascular risk nor impairment in quality of life versus crizotinib. Furthermore, the rate of permanent treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was numerically higher with alectinib (26%) than with lorlatinib (7%). In conclusion, despite the immature OS data for both drugs, the efficacy of lorlatinib appears higher than alectinib while maintaining a manageable toxicity profile. Full article

Alectinib HCl (ALBHCl) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The aim of this study is to unlock some of the physicochemical properties of ALBHCL that serve as a database for any future studies. A solubility study of ALBHCL was performed in different solvents. Also, photostability was tested in the solution and solid states, and the order of reaction and rate constant were calculated. In addition to the pH solubility relation, the pH-rate relation at different temperatures was also studied, and the profiles were constructed. A solubility study was also performed in different media for the purpose of optimizing suitable sink conditions for the in vitro dissolution testing of solid dosage forms. Solubility tests in multiple solvents and pH conditions revealed that the highest solubility was in DMSO, methanol, and chloroform, with acidic media yielding the maximum solubility but degrading at rather low pH levels. ALBHCL proved unstable at high temperatures and under light exposure, with varying stability across different pH levels. The optimal dissolution media for in vitro oral dosage form evaluation were determined, achieving sink conditions at pH levels of 6.8 and 4.5 with specific additives. This study enhances the existing database on ALBHCL’s physicochemical properties, emphasizing the importance of pH optimization in pharmaceutical processes and providing valuable insights into its pharmaceutical application. Full article