Search Results (32)

Background: Gingival recession (GR) is defined as the exposure of the root surface due to the gingival margin shifting apically from the cemento-enamel junction. Current effective management of defects related to GR relies on root coverage periodontal plastic surgery (RCPPS), using the Modified Coronally Advanced Flap (mCAF) with an envelope design. Recent literature also reported the association of different biomaterials to the mCAF procedure. In light of these considerations, a systematic review (SR) was conducted to determine and compare the efficacy of all mCAF adjunctive techniques for the treatment of multiple adjacent GR-type (MAGR) defects. Methods: An electronic search was conducted in 2025 on studies published between 2013 and 2025, using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cinahl Complete, to address the focused question: “which is the efficacy of different mCAF adjunctive techniques for the treatment of multiple adjacent GR-type defects, in terms of root coverage (RC), esthetic outcomes, and keratinized tissue (KT) augmentation?”. Randomized controlled trials with a minimum follow-up of 6 months with ≥ 5 patients treated for coverage of MAGR were included. Risk of bias was assessed with RoB 2 Tool. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.4 software and the level of evidence of included studies was analyzed with GRADEPro GDT. Results: A total of 17 studies were included in the SR, 9 of which evaluating mCAF + sCTG (subepithelial connective tissue graft) vs. mCAF adjunctive techniques [Collagen Matrix (CM), xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix (XADM), Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF), Enamel Matrix Derivatives (EMD), sCTG harvested double blade scalpel] were then included in the meta-analysis. The primary outcomes of complete root coverage (CRC) and keratinized tissue width variation (ΔKTW) were statistically significant ([CRC: Odds Ratio (OR) 1.70; 95% CI (confidence interval) 1.18, 2.44; p = 0.004]; [ΔKTW: SMD (standardized mean difference) 0.37; 95% CI 0.11, 0.63; p = 0.005]) in favor of mCAF + CTG. Meanwhile, no statistically significant difference was observed in terms of RES. The certainty assessment highlighted relevant results: despite the lack of evidence in the long-term, a high level of evidence showed that sCTG was more effective than XADM in terms of CRC (p = 0.002) and ΔKTW (p = 0.0001). A low level of evidence revealed that sCTG achieved a greater ΔKTW compared to CM (p = 0.0006). Although no significant differences were observed, a low level of evidence suggested that mCAF + EMD and mCAF + sCTG (DBS) may provide good results. To date, only one RCT showed long-term stable results of CTG in terms of RC. Conclusions: The association of sCTG to mCAF demonstrated better results in terms of RC and KTW augmentation in short- and medium-term follow-ups. Long-term studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of the other mCAF adjunctive techniques, considering limitations due to heterogeneity in follow-ups, distribution of techniques analyzed, and different study designs. Registration in PROSPERO (International prospective register of systematic reviews) was performed with ID CRD420251085823. Full article

Background: The aim of this bibliometric study was to evaluate publication trends in the most frequently cited clinical trials on the treatment of gingival recession, taking into account the augmentation materials used. Methods: A Web of Science search was performed among articles published by 30 September 2024. Two independent reviewers evaluated year of publication, journal, authorship country of authors, collaborative relationship, keywords, and the main domains. Results: The top one hundred most-cited clinical trials were published in the span of 26 years from 1993 to 2019, and the total citation counts varied from 44 to 284 (83.69 citations per paper). There was correlation between the time of publication and the number of citations. The articles were authored by 333 researchers representing twenty-two countries. Italy contributed the highest number of articles (n = 36), followed by the USA (n = 28) and Brazil (n = 17). International collaborations were predominantly observed between Italy, the USA, and Switzerland. The type of graft was the most cited field of research (34), followed by guided tissue regeneration (17) and enamel matrix derivative (13). Conclusions: The country that produced the highest number publications among the 100 most-cited clinical trials on gingival recession treatment was Italy. The use of connective tissue graft (CTG) and coronally advanced flap (CAF) was the most prominent trend. Future work should combine bibliometric mapping with critical quality appraisal and explore whether citation trends align with best available evidence. Full article

Background and Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix (XCM) in combination with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the management of multiple gingival recessions and to compare its outcomes with those achieved using the conventional connective tissue graft (CTG) + CAF approach. Materials and Methods: After searching and reviewing the literature in the electronic databases PubMed/PMC, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, and LILACS, 601 publications were found. The titles and abstracts of 543 publications were screened. After evaluating the full text of 290 publications, based on the inclusion criteria, four randomized controlled clinical trials were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. In all the studies, the test group was treated with XCM + CAF, whereas in the control group, CTG + CAF was used. Results: Clinical attachment level (CAL), gingival recession depth (GR), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and complete root coverage (CRC) statistically significantly (p < 0.05) improved in both groups in all of the studies. Inter-group comparison showed better results in the control group in individual studies. All clinical trials reported a statistically significant (p < 0.05) decrease in surgery time and less postoperative pain in the test group. The meta-analysis of KTW (−0.438 [95% CI, −0.714 to −0.163], p < 0.002) and GR (0.35 [95% CI, 0.098 to 0.602], p < 0.001) showed a significant difference between the test and the control groups in all of the studies. CAL (0.78 [95% CI, −0.305 to 0.461], p > 0.05) showed no statistically significant difference between test and control groups. Conclusions: CTG + CAF remains the gold standard in root coverage procedures. However, XCM offers a less invasive alternative with improved patient comfort, less postoperative pain, shorter surgical time, and acceptable clinical outcomes. Full article

Background: Treatment of gingival recessions starts from an accurate diagnosis considering both periodontal tissue status and adjacent exposed dental tissues. Based on current scientific evidence and the authors’ clinical experience, a decisional scheme has been proposed for the management of gingival recession defects, with or without non-carious cervical lesions, taking into account gingival thickness and interproximal attachment levels. To illustrate its practical application, a series of representative clinical cases is presented, documenting the rationale and outcomes of the therapeutic decisions. Methods: According to the 2017 World Workshop Classification of Periodontal and Peri-Implant Diseases and Conditions, the gingival recession defect classifications have been used to build up a decision-making therapeutic process. Combined periodontal and restorative treatments in presence or absence of dental lesions have been performed. Results: In case of an identifiable cemento-enamel junction (CEJ) with or without non-carious cervical lesions (class A+ and class A−, respectively) and absence of interproximal attachment loss (RT1), flap approaches alone or in combination with connective tissue graft (CTG) were suggested. In case of an unidentifiable CEJ without cervical lesion (class B−), flap approaches alone were proposed in presence of adequate residual keratinized tissue (KT) and absence of interproximal attachment loss (RT1); if KT is extremely reduced, flap approaches + CTG may be performed. If the unidentifiable CEJ is associated with cervical lesions involving both root and crown surfaces (class B+), the combined restorative–periodontal treatment results as the most indicated approach. The adjunctive use of CTG should be also considered in presence of interproximal attachment loss (RT2 and RT3) and reduced gingival thickness (<1 mm). Conclusions: The proposed decisional scheme could be useful to address the clinicians during the decision-making process in the treatment of gingival recessions. Full article

Background: Gingival recession is a common condition involving apical displacement of the gingival margin, leading to root surface exposure and associated complications such as dentin hypersensitivity and root caries. Among the most effective treatment options are the tunneling technique (TUN) and the coronally advanced flap (CAF), both combined with connective tissue grafts (CTGs). This study aimed to evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of TUN + CTG and CAF + CTG in terms of root coverage and keratinized tissue width (KTW) over a 6–12-month follow-up. Methods: A randomized, double-blind clinical trial was conducted following CONSORT guidelines (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06228534). Participants were randomly assigned to receive either TUN + CTG or CAF + CTG. Clinical parameters, including gingival recession depth (REC) and KTW, were assessed at baseline as well as 6 months and 12 months postoperatively using a calibrated periodontal probe. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics and linear mixed models to compare outcomes over time, with a significance level set at 5%. Results: Both techniques demonstrated significant clinical improvements. At 6 months, mean root coverage was 100% in CAF + CTG cases and 97% in TUN + CTG cases, while complete root coverage (REC = 0) was observed in 100% and 89% of cases, respectively. At 12 months, root coverage remained stable, at 99% in the CAF + CTG group and 97% in the TUN + CTG group. KTW increased in both groups, with higher values observed in the CAF + CTG group (3.53 mm vs. 3.11 mm in TUN + CTG at 12 months). No significant postoperative complications were reported. Conclusions: Both TUN + CTG and CAF + CTG are safe and effective techniques for treating RT1 and RT2 gingival recession, offering high percentages of root coverage and increased KTW. While CAF + CTG achieved slightly superior coverage and tissue gain, the TUN was associated with better aesthetic outcomes and faster recovery, making it a valuable alternative in clinical practice. Full article

Background: The prevalence of gingival recessions (GRs) in the global population is 78%. A long-term study showed a 47% increase in the prevalence of GRs five years post-orthodontic treatment, particularly in the lower anterior region. It can be caused and/or exacerbated after orthodontic treatment, where the retainer placed can induce tooth movement or when it fails to maintain a passive position upon bonding. Thus, the goal of this case report was to present treatments for gingival recessions, with the approaches of the laterally closed tunnel technique and parallel incision methods, after orthodontic treatment in patients using non-passive lingual retainers. Methods: This case report adhered to the CARE guidelines. Three healthy patients were referred due to GR defects in the lower anterior region (RT1 and RT2). All patients had GR associated with deficient lingual-fixed orthodontics retainers. The same experienced periodontist (ATD) developed the surgeries and aimed to achieve root coverage using the connective tissue graft associated with a coronally advanced flap (CAF) and modify the recipient area’s gingival phenotype. Results: In all cases, a new orthodontic treatment was not possible due to anatomical or patient-related factors. Outcomes after six months, three years, and five years are presented, encompassing clinical and esthetic evaluations. Conclusions: GRs must always be addressed by orthodontic therapy or lingual-fixed orthodontic retainers. In cases where dental elements are positioned outside the bone envelope, orthodontic treatment may be considered before root coverage surgery. Therefore, surgical intervention should be undertaken for the keratinized tissue and volume gain, independently of the tooth position. Modifying the phenotype in these situations is vital for the long-term maintenance of periodontal health. Full article

Background/Objectives: The use of titanium meshes in bone regeneration is a clinical procedure that regenerates bone defects by ensuring graft stability and biocompatibility. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of titanium mesh procedures in terms of vertical bone gain and the exposure rate. Methods: The product screening and eligibility analysis were performed using the Pubmed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar electronic databases by two authors. The selected articles were classified based on the study design, regenerative technique, tested groups and materials, sample size, clinical findings, and follow-up. A risk of bias calculation was conducted on the selected randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized trials and a series of pairwise meta-analysis calculations were performed for the vertical bone gain (VBG) and exposure rate. A significantly lower exposure rate was observed using coronally advanced lingual flaps (p < 0.05). No difference was observed between the titanium mesh and GBR techniques in terms of VBG (p > 0.05). Results: The initial search output 288 articles, and 164 papers were excluded after the eligibility analysis. The descriptive synthesis considered a total of 97 papers and 6 articles were considered for the pairwise comparison. Conclusions: Within the limits of the present investigation, the titanium mesh procedure reported high VBG values after the healing period. The mesh exposure rate was drastically lower with passive management of the surgical flap. Full article

Introduction: Gingival recession, characterized by the apical displacement of the gingival margin, presents challenges to oral health. This study compares the effectiveness of the coronally advanced flap (CAF) and the tunnel technique (TT) for treating gingival recessions. Methods: Bibliographical searches included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane, Scopus, and the grey literature, with keywords “root coverage” “coronary advanced flap”, and “tunnel”. A systematic coreview was performed that included 26 studies evaluating root coverage, and 14 articles were included for the meta-analysis. Three groups were analyzed: Group 1 compared TT with connective tissue graft (CTG) versus CAF with CTG; Group 2 examined TT with CTG and/or other biomaterials versus TT with CTG alone; Group 3 compared TT with CAF, regardless of complementary biomaterials. Meta-analysis assessed mean root coverage (MRC), complete root coverage (CRC), and keratinized tissue gain (KTG). Results: In Group 1, TT with CTG demonstrated superior MRC compared with CAF with CTG (−8.68 CI95% −17.19 to −0.17; p = 0.0457). In Group 2, TT with CTG and/or other biomaterials showed similar MRC (4.17 CI95% −17.91 to 26.26; p = 0.7110) and CRC (0.37 CI95% −1.14 to 1.89; p = 0.6269) to TT with CTG alone, with variations in keratinized tissue gain. Group 3 indicated higher potential MRC for TT compared with CAF (5.73 CI95% −8.90 to 13.55; p = 0.685) but without statistically significant differences. Conclusions: This study suggests that TT with CTG might offer better root coverage than CAF with CTG; however, biomaterial selection requires consideration. Full article

The mucosa height has always been of interest in modern implant dentistry to obtain biomimetic results. Papilla height, mucosa scalloping, and free mucosal margin level are crucial to achieve “pink aesthetics”. The aim of this study was to investigate the vertical increase in the peri-implant soft tissues with a porcine cross-linked collagen matrix (Geistlich Fibro-Gide^®). Methods: A total of 60 patients were divided into the following three groups: Group 1—patients who received porcine cross-linked collagen matrix for vertical soft tissue augmentation and a cover screw combined with a coronally advanced flap (CAF); Group 2—patients who received the collagen matrix combined with a healing abutment and CAF; Group 3 (control group)—patients who received a traditional surgical approach based on crestal incision and no collagen matrix as well as no CAF. Results: The average horizontal tissue thickness growth after 3 months was more effective for Group 1 (1.35 ± 1.23 mm) compared to Group 2 (0.85 ± 0.67 mm) and the control group (0.20 ± 0.41 mm). The average tissue height growth was 1.05 ± 1.39 mm for Group 1, 0.32 ± 1.28 mm for Group 2, and −0.05 ± 0.39 mm for the control group. Finally, the average increase in the band of keratinized mucosa was 0.60 ± 1.23 mm for Group 1, −0.60 ± 0.94 mm for Group 2, and 0.45 ± 0.60 mm for the control group. Conclusions: The combination of the CAF, porcine cross-linked collagen matrix, and cover screw resulted in better clinical results compared to Group 2 and 3. Full article

Background: This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the differences in the performance of root coverage between collagen matrix and subepithelial connective tissue. Methods: A comprehensive search using a combination of controlled vocabulary (MeSH) and free-text terms was undertaken by two reviewers to identify published systematic reviews. Three major electronic databases (Medline via PubMed, Cochrane database, and Embase) were searched up to October 2023. Results: Initially, five hundred and seventy-six articles were identified, but only nine studies met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed that the pooled mean difference in mean root coverage of collagen matrix compared with subepithelial connective tissue was −0.48 (95% confidence interval of −0.69 to −0.26). The relative risk of complete root coverage of collagen matrix compared with subepithelial connective tissue was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 0.94). The pooled mean difference in width of keratinized tissue of collagen matrix compared with subepithelial connective tissue was −0.75 (95% confidence interval of −1.25 to −0.26). Conclusions: The outcomes of this study revealed that subepithelial connective tissue generally exhibited superior performance. Nonetheless, the utilization of the coronally advanced flap with collagen matrix may yield comparable results in terms of the percentage of complete root coverage. Full article

This study aims to evaluate the influence of the additional use of enamel matrix derivate (EMD) in the treatment of gingival recession defects using a coronally advanced flap (CAF) and a xenogeneic dermal matrix (XDM) by means of digital and clinical assessment methods. In this prospective randomized controlled study, recession height and area, width and thickness of keratinized gingiva, pocket probing depth, and clinical attachment levels were measured at the baseline and followed up for one year. Fifteen patients (n = 15) with 24 gingival recession defects were treated between 2019 and 2021. On average, the digitally assessed root coverage of the control group (CAF + XDM) was not significantly different compared to the test group (CAF + XDM + EMD), with 69 ± 28% and 36 ± 32%, respectively (p = 0.094). One year postoperatively, there were no differences found regarding keratinized tissue width (KTW) between the control group and test group (p = 0.690). However, the control group showed superior results in the thickness of keratinized gingiva (p = 0.044). The present study showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the root coverage results in the CAF + XDM + EMD group compared to the CAF + XDM group. The adjunctive use of EMD to a CAF and XDM in the treatment of gingival recession defects does not appear to have any clinical benefit. Full article

Peri-implant soft tissue deficiency (PSTD) is a significant factor impacting aesthetics, particularly in the anterior zone, where labial bone resorption and thin peri-implant phenotypes are common. The occurrence of a gray color around the implant fixture due to PSTD can be aesthetically concerning in the esthetic zone. In cases involving natural teeth, autogenous soft tissue grafts such as subepithelial connective tissue grafts (SCTGs), free gingival grafts (FGGs), and coronally advanced flaps (CAFs) are commonly utilized. However, there are limited reports of using bone grafts in conjunction with these techniques for modifying the gingival phenotype around both teeth and implants. In the presented cases where PSTD resulted in visible gray coloration of the implant fixture in the esthetic zone, mechanical and chemical decontamination of the exposed implant surface was performed using a titanium brush and tetracycline (Tc) HCl. Subsequently, to enhance peri-implant mucosa thickness and mask the titanium color, simultaneous SCTG and bone grafting procedures were conducted. Within the limitations of these case reports, successful esthetic outcomes were achieved and maintained without recurrence for 3–6 years following the simultaneous subepithelial connective tissue graft and bone graft procedures. These findings suggest the potential efficacy of this combined approach in addressing PSTD and enhancing aesthetic results around dental implants, though further studies are needed to validate these outcomes. Full article

The goal of plastic periodontal surgery is to obtain complete root coverage, increasing gingival thickness (GT), a positive prognostic factor for gingival margin stability over time. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Coronally Advanced Flap (CAF) in RT1 (GR; gingival recession with no loss of interproximal attachment) when associated with a connective tissue graft from the maxillary tuberosity (tCTG) or with leukocyte and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) membranes in obtaining root coverage and increasing the thickness and width of the keratinized tissue, along with aesthetic improvement, taking into account a number of patient-related outcomes. Thirty patients with two adjacent RT1 GRs (GRs with no loss of interproximal attachment) were each treated using CAF associated with tCTG (15 patients) or L-PRF. The main outcome was a GT increase; secondary outcomes were keratinized tissue width (KT), gingival recession (GR), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), root coverage percentage (RC%), complete root coverage (CRC), and root coverage esthetic score (RES). Patient-reported outcomes were discomfort (D), dentine hypersensitivity (DH), patient-related esthetic score (PRES), and overall treatment satisfaction (OTS). After 12 months, clinical and patient-reported parameters did not show significant differences between groups, with the only exception being a GT gain, which was significantly greater in the CAF + tCTG group. Our results showed that both techniques were effective in treating RT1 GRs, with comparable patient-related outcomes. However, the use of tCTG produces significantly thicker tissue, covering the exposed root surface. Full article

Background: Different extracellular matrix (ECM)-based technologies in periodontal and peri-implant soft tissue augmentation have been proposed in the market. The present review compared the efficacy of soft tissue substitutes (STSs) and autogenous free gingival grafts (FGGs) or connective tissue grafts (CTGs) in mucogingival procedures to increase keratinized tissue (KT) width around teeth and implants. Methods: Two independent examiners performed an electronic search on MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library based on the following PICOS format: (P) adult patients; (I) soft tissue substitutes and FGGs/CTGs; (C) STSs vs. CTGs; STSs vs. FGGs; STSs vs control; (O) KT width gain; (S) systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials. Studies published before November 2023 were included. Results: Around teeth, all biomaterials showed superior performance compared to a coronally advanced flap (CAF) alone for treating gingival recessions. However, when compared to CTGs, acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) yield the most similar outcomes to the gold standard (CTGs), even though in multiple recessions, CTGs continue to be considered the most favorable approach. The use of STSs (acellular matrix or tissue-engineered) in combination with apically positioned flaps (APF) resulted in significantly less gain in KT width compared to that achieved with FGGs and APFs. Around dental implants, free gingival grafts were deemed more effective than soft tissue substitutes in enhancing keratinized mucosa width. Conclusions: Based on the available evidence, questions remain about the alternative use of soft tissue substitutes for conventional grafting procedures using free gingival grafts or connective tissue grafts around teeth and implants. Full article

A coronally advanced flap combined with a subepithelial connective tissue graft is considered the gold standard for achieving root coverage on exposed root surfaces. Nevertheless, challenges arise when this technique is applied to multiple teeth and when the palatal soft tissue is very thin. Several surgical modifications have been reported to simultaneously achieve both single or multiple root coverage and widening of the keratinized gingiva. In this context, there have been no reported cases utilizing the submerged technique with partially de-epithelialized free gingival grafts. We intend to introduce a submerged technique involving partially de-epithelialized free gingival grafts for the modification of soft tissue phenotypes in the maxillary anterior region. Full article