Search Results (47)

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the deadliest types of cancer, characterized by a short life expectancy after diagnosis, mostly related to therapy resistance and recurrence. GBM stem-like cells (GSCs) reside within the tumor and contribute to these features; therefore, finding drugs that specifically target such cells holds promise to halt GBM progression. The primary objective of this work is to comprehensively review and discuss the potential of hard drug repurposing to target GSCs. Several studies evaluating drugs showing anti-GSC activity, originally approved for non-cancer indications, were identified. These mainly included antidiabetics (e.g., Metformin, Phenformin, and Sitagliptin), antihypertensives (e.g., Nicardipine, Doxazosin, and Prazosin), antimicrobials (e.g., Pyrvinium pamoate, Flubendazole, and Clofazimine), and central nervous system-acting drugs (e.g., Chlorpromazine, Fluvoxamine, and Disulfiram). Relevant candidates include those that disrupt GSC metabolism, namely impairing mitochondrial function, such as Metformin, Chlorpromazine, and Pyrvinium pamoate. Multiple signaling pathways may be involved, namely the Wnt, PI3K/AKT, and STAT3 pathways, among others. Also significant were those drugs tested in combination, resulting in increased sensitivity to Temozolomide (TMZ), the standard pharmacological treatment available for GBM. Some repurposed agents, such as Disulfiram and Metformin, have already reached clinical testing, although none have yet been incorporated into clinical practice. Importantly, major translational barriers remain, like limited blood–brain barrier penetration and the lack of robust clinical trials. In conclusion, drug repurposing is an affordable and suitable strategy to target GSCs, impairing cell viability, reducing stemness, and enhancing their sensitivity to TMZ, which has potential that should be further explored to improve patients’ clinical outcomes. Full article

Background: Depression, a major global health issue, is commonly treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Given the link between depression and inflammation, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may have adjunctive benefits. Clinically, SSRIs and NSAIDs are often co-prescribed for comorbid pain or inflammatory conditions. However, both drug classes pose risks of adverse effects, and their interaction may lead to clinically significant drug–drug interactions. Objectives: This study analyzed FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data (2004–2024) to assess gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury (AKI) potential risks linked to SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, fluvoxamine, and sertraline) and NSAIDs (propionic/acetic/enolic acid derivatives, COX-2 inhibitors) in depression patients, alone and combined. Methods: Disproportionality analysis (crude reporting odds ratios, cROR) identified possible associations; drug interactions were evaluated using Ω shrinkage, additive, multiplicative, and combination risk ratio (CRR) models. Results: Gastrointestinal bleeding risk was potentially elevated with citalopram (cROR = 2.81), escitalopram (2.27), paroxetine (2.17), fluvoxamine (3.58), sertraline (1.69), and propionic acid NSAIDs (3.17). Thrombocytopenia showed a potential correlation with fluoxetine (2.11) and paroxetine (2.68). AKI risk may be increased with citalopram (1.39), escitalopram (1.36), fluvoxamine (3.24), and COX-2 inhibitors (2.24). DDI signal analysis suggested that citalopram in combination with propionic acid derivatives (additive model = 0.01, multiplicative model = 1.14, and CRR = 3.13) might increase the risk of bleeding. Paroxetine combined with NSAIDs (additive model = 0.014, multiplicative model = 2.65, and CRR = 2.99) could potentially increase the risk of thrombocytopenia. Sertraline combined with NSAIDs (Ω₀₂₅ = 0.94, multiplicative model = 2.14) might be associated with an increasing risk of AKI. Citalopram combined with propionic acid derivatives (Ω₀₂₅ = 1.08, multiplicative model = 2.17, and CRR = 2.42) could be associated with an increased risk of acute kidney injury. Conclusions: Certain combinations of SSRIs and NSAIDs might further elevate these risks of gastrointestinal bleeding, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury in patients with depression. Given the potential drug–drug interactions, heightened clinical vigilance is advised when prescribing SSRIs and NSAIDs in combination to patients with depression. Full article

Background: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are among the most commonly prescribed antidepressants and are generally considered safe. However, emerging data suggest a potential association with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), especially among elderly patients and those on anticoagulation. Methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis using data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Reports up to May 2025 listing an SSRI (sertraline, fluoxetine, paroxetine, escitalopram, citalopram, or fluvoxamine) as a suspect or interacting drug and involving an ICH event were included. Disproportionality was assessed using reporting odds ratios (RORs) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Among 226 eligible ICH cases, sertraline (30.5%), paroxetine (28.8%), and fluoxetine (27.9%) were most frequently implicated. Sertraline showed a strong signal for cerebral hemorrhage (ROR = 4.97), while fluoxetine was associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (ROR = 4.51). Sertraline had a pronounced signal among patients aged >60 years (ROR = 7.92) and in combination with anticoagulants (ROR = 9.56). Fluoxetine was underrepresented in elderly cases. Given the very small number of fluvoxamine-related cases (n = 2), interpretation should be cautious due to limited statistical power. Gender-stratified analyses showed female predominance in sertraline-related ICH and male predominance for paroxetine. Citalopram demonstrated a potentially protective profile with inverse association with cerebral hemorrhage. Conclusions: This study highlights significant differences in ICH reporting patterns across SSRIs, modified by patient age, gender, and co-medication. These findings underscore the need for individualized SSRI prescribing, particularly in patients receiving anticoagulant therapy particularly in elderly patients and those receiving anticoagulant therapy, where sertraline and fluoxetine may pose increased risk. Full article

Background/Objectives: OCD is a chronic psychiatric disorder, often requiring long-term pharmacological treatment. Although selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are considered first-line agents, 40 to 60% of patients show only partial or no response when treated at standard dosages. In such cases, supratherapeutic doses of SSRIs have been proposed as an alternative strategy. However, the evidence supporting this approach remains limited and fragmented. This review aims to evaluate the rationale, clinical efficacy, tolerability, and practical considerations associated with high-dose SSRI use in OCD. Methods: A structured narrative review was conducted using targeted literature searches in PubMed and Scopus. Studies were included if they reported on the use of high-dose SSRIs (citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline) in patients with OCD and provided efficacy and/or tolerability data. Clinical trials, observational studies, and case reports were all reviewed. Results: Evidence shows that higher doses of SSRIs are significantly more effective than low or medium doses in reducing OCD symptoms—especially in individuals who have only partially responded to standard treatment. Smaller clinical studies and case reports have also demonstrated that supratherapeutic dosing, beyond typical regulatory limits, can be both effective and well tolerated in treatment-resistant OCD. Conclusions: High-dose SSRI treatment may be a valuable option for selected OCD patients who do not respond to standard therapy. However, careful patient selection, regular monitoring, and further controlled studies are necessary to better define its long-term safety and effectiveness. In this context, increasingly advanced technologies—such as therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacogenetic testing for relevant polymorphisms—may support more individualized and safer treatment strategies. Full article

Background: Depression is one of the leading causes of disability worldwide. Among pharmacological treatments, fluvoxamine—an early SSRI with a distinct pharmacological profile—has been recently reappraised for its broader clinical relevance. Objective: To assess the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of depression compared to placebo and other antidepressants through a comprehensive overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, including systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials evaluating fluvoxamine’s efficacy. Reviews were eligible if they included adults diagnosed with depressive disorders based on the DSM or ICD criteria. Reviews focusing on other psychiatric disorders, comorbidities, tolerability, or economic evaluations were excluded. Data extraction included effect size measures and methodological quality assessments using the AMSTAR-2 tool. Results were synthesized by comparing fluvoxamine to placebo, tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and other antidepressants. Results: A total of 74 reviews were identified, of which 14 systematic reviews met the inclusion criteria after screening and full-text analysis. These reviews, published between 1994 and 2021, predominantly involved nine pairwise meta-analyses and five network meta-analyses, comparing fluvoxamine with placebo and various antidepressants. Fluvoxamine demonstrated consistent superiority over placebo in achieving treatment response and remission outcomes. Comparisons with imipramine, clomipramine, amitriptyline, dothiepin, paroxetine, fluoxetine, citalopram, mianserin, nortriptyline, and moclobemide generally revealed no significant differences in efficacy. However, some reviews indicated that venlafaxine and mirtazapine were superior to fluvoxamine in certain outcomes, while fluvoxamine demonstrated greater efficacy than desipramine in one review. Sertraline and milnacipran showed mixed or review-quality-dependent results, with one low-quality review favoring milnacipran. Most reviews assessed outcomes over a median follow-up of six weeks using standardized depression rating scales. Conclusions: Fluvoxamine is a robust and effective antidepressant, demonstrating consistent efficacy comparable to other antidepressants and superior to placebo. While no single antidepressant was universally superior, fluvoxamine’s unique pharmacological profile and favourable safety characteristics support its clinical utility. Further research is needed to explore its role in personalized treatment strategies and emerging therapeutic contexts, such as comorbid anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder. Full article

Neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer’s, Parkinson’s, and Huntington’s disease, due to their multifaced and complicated nature, remain uncurable and impose substantial financial and human burdens on society. Therefore, developing new innovative therapeutic strategies is vital. In this context, drug repurposing has emerged as a promising avenue to expedite the development of treatments for these challenging conditions. One particularly compelling target in this regard is the chaperone protein sigma-1 receptor (S1R), which has garnered significant attention for its neuroprotective properties. Interestingly, several medications, including fluvoxamine (an antidepressant), dextromethorphan (a cough suppressant), and amantadine (an antiviral), which were initially developed for unrelated indications, have shown encouraging results in neurodegenerative therapy through S1R activation. These findings suggest that existing drugs in pharmacopeias can play an essential role in alleviating neurodegenerative symptoms by modulating S1R, thereby offering a faster route and cost-effective path to clinical applications compared to the de novo development of entirely new compounds. Furthermore, as a synergistic benefit, combining S1R-targeting drugs with other therapeutic agents may also improve treatment efficacy. In this review, we highlight key repurposed drugs targeting S1R and explore their mechanisms of action, shedding light on their emerging therapeutic potential in the fight against neurodegeneration. Full article

This review concentrates on the application of carbon-based materials in the development and fabrication of voltammetric sensors of antidepressant drugs used in the treatment of moderate to severe depression, anxiety disorders, personality disorders, and various phobias. Voltammetric techniques offer outstanding sensitivity and selectivity, accuracy, low detection limit, high reproducibility, instrumental simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and short time of direct determination of antidepressant drugs in pharmaceutical and clinical samples. Moreover, the combination of voltammetric approaches with the unique characteristics of carbon and its derivatives has led to the development of powerful electrochemical sensing tools for detecting antidepressant drugs, which are highly desirable in healthcare, environmental monitoring, and the pharmaceutical industry. In this review, carbon-based materials, such as glassy carbon and boron-doped diamond, and a wide spectrum of carbon nanoparticles, including graphene, graphene oxides, reduced graphene oxides, single-walled carbon nanotubes, and multi-walled carbon nanotubes were described in terms of the sensing performance of agomelatine, alprazolam, amitriptyline, aripiprazole, carbamazepine, citalopram, clomipramine, clozapine, clonazepam, desipramine, desvenlafaxine, doxepin, duloxetine, flunitrazepam, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, imipramine, nifedipine, olanzapine, opipramol, paroxetine, quetiapine, serotonin, sertraline, sulpiride, thioridazine, trazodone, venlafaxine, and vortioxetine. Full article

Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of anxiety disorders and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) by synthesizing evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods: We conducted a literature search in PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, focusing on fluvoxamine’s efficacy in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), social anxiety disorder (SAD), panic disorder (PD), and OCD. We included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing fluvoxamine to a placebo or other drugs. The quality of evidence from the included reviews was assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews—version 2 (AMSTAR-2). Results: The study included fourteen systematic reviews (five for OCD, three for SAD, and six for PD), covering thirty-seven RCTs (sixteen for OCD, six for SAD, and fifteen for PD), with a total of 3621 patients (1745 with OCD, 1034 with SAD, and 842 with PD). A high-quality systematic review demonstrated that fluvoxamine is superior to a placebo in improving symptoms and the response rates for OCD. Three meta-analyses comparing fluvoxamine to clomipramine in OCD found no significant differences in efficacy regarding symptom improvement. Two additional systematic reviews, both rated as high quality, confirmed the superiority of fluvoxamine in reducing symptom severity and improving the response rates in patients with SAD compared to a placebo. However, the findings for PD were inconsistent. A meta-analysis, also rated as high quality, found that while fluvoxamine showed better response rates than a placebo, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Overall, the efficacy of fluvoxamine in the treatment of OCD and SAD was demonstrated. While some reviews highlighted its potential in alleviating GAD, its impact on panic-specific outcomes remained inconsistent. Full article

Depression persists as one of the illnesses described relentlessly through the centuries because it affects a large group of people. Background/Objectives: The treatment of depression consists of various therapeutic agents, among which selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are elective. As polypharmacy tends to become the norm in modern days, the study of the real-life occurrence of drug–drug interactions is imperative. The aim of this study was the evaluation of drug–drug interactions (DDIs) between antidepressant medicines, namely SSRIs (each representative) versus eleven representatives from other antidepressant classes. Methods: Based on the spontaneous safety reports (ICSRs) uploaded to EudraVigilance until the end of July 2024, the descriptive and the disproportionality analyses were performed, and results were interpreted in the context of pharmacologic variability. Results: SSRIs were the focus of 137,369 ICSRs while for the other antidepressants, namely amitriptyline, clomipramine, duloxetine, venlafaxine, mirtazapine, bupropion, trazodone, tianeptine, agomelatine, brexpiprazole, and esketamine, a total of 155,458 reports were registered. The most notable differences appeared in psychiatric adverse drug reactions. Except fluvoxamine (n = 463), the remaining SSRIs had a higher number of DDIs reported (n = 1049 for escitalopram and n = 1549 for sertraline) compared to other antidepressants. However, similar numbers of DDIs were reported for duloxetine (n = 1252) and venlafaxine (n = 1513). Sertraline unspecified DDIs were reported with a higher probability compared to all other drugs (e.g., esketamine ROR: 9.37, 95% CI: 5.17–16.96, tianeptine ROR: 4.08, 95% CI: 2.49–6.69, etc.). Conclusions: SSRIs, although known to influence various cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, have not shown higher inhibitory interactions compared to any of the drugs selected as reference. Sertraline appears in more reports concerning DDIs than the other antidepressants. Still, further real world studies related to the DDIs of SSRIs are needed to complete the relevant knowledge level. Full article

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of chronic kidney disease. Current treatments for DKD do not halt renal injury progression, highlighting an urgent need for therapies targeting key disease mechanisms. Our previous studies demonstrated that activating the Sigma-1 receptor (S1R) with fluvoxamine (FLU) protects against acute kidney injury by inhibiting inflammation and ameliorating the effect of hypoxia. Based on these, we hypothesized that FLU might exert a similar protective effect in DKD. Diabetes was induced in male Wistar rats using streptozotocin, followed by a seven-week FLU treatment. Metabolic and renal parameters were assessed along with a histological analysis of glomerular damage and fibrosis. The effects of FLU on inflammation, hypoxia, and fibrosis were tested in human proximal tubular cells and normal rat kidney fibroblasts. FLU improved renal function and reduced glomerular damage and tubulointerstitial fibrosis. It also mitigated inflammation by reducing TLR4, IL6, and NFKB1 expressions and moderated the cellular response to tubular hypoxia. Additionally, FLU suppressed TGF-β1-induced fibrotic processes and fibroblast transformation. These findings suggest that S1R activation can slow DKD progression and protect renal function by modulating critical inflammatory, hypoxic, and fibrotic pathways; therefore, it might serve as a promising novel drug target for preventing DKD. Full article

As the most common psychiatric symptom, depression represents a subject of high interest for the medical community. Background/Objectives: International guidelines consider selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) the first-line treatment of depression. Although having better efficacy and tolerability in comparison to tricyclic antidepressants or monoamine oxidase inhibitors, the diversity and potential severity of adverse effects and interactions manifested by SSRIs, combined with the frequency of prescriptions, lead to the necessity of evaluating real-world data. The aim of this study was to identify and evaluate the drug interactions reported in EudraVigilance (EV) for the six SSRIs representatives that are authorized in Europe: fluoxetine (FXT), fluvoxamine (FVM), citalopram (CIT), escitalopram (ESC), paroxetine (PAR) and sertraline (SER). The entire class of SSRIs was examined as a comparator to identify whether one of the representatives was more prone to reporting. Methods: Descriptive analysis and disproportionality analysis were conducted on data extracted from the EV database. Results: A total of 326,450 adverse reactions (ADRs) were reported for the SSRIs group. Approximately a quarter of these (n = 83,201; 25.46%) were reported for SER and 22.37% (n = 73,131) for PAR. Of the total ADRs reported, 2.12% (n = 6925) represent preferred terms related to drug-drug interactions (DDIs): SER (n = 1474; 22.37%), CIT (n = 1272, 19.86), and FXT (n = 1309, 19.83%). Specific ADRs related to inhibitory activity represent 0.98%, and for potentiating activity, 1.89%. Conclusions: Although representing a small value of the total ADRs, DDIs may be related to severe outcomes. Awareness should be raised for this category of ADRs that can be reduced by the joined efforts of physicians and pharmacists. Full article

Introduction: Fluvoxamine is used in children and adolescents (‘youths’) for treating obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) but also off-label for depressive and anxiety disorders. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between fluvoxamine dose and serum concentrations, independent correlates of fluvoxamine concentrations, and a preliminary therapeutic reference range (TRR) for youths with OCD and treatment response. Methods: Multicenter naturalistic data of a therapeutic drug monitoring service, as well as prospective data of the ‘TDM Vigil study’ (EudraCT 2013-004881-33), were analyzed. Patient and treatment characteristics were assessed by standardized measures, including Clinical Global Impressions—Severity (CGI-S) and —Change (CGI-I), with CGI-I of much or very much improved defining treatment response and adverse drug reactions using the Udvalg for Kliniske Undersogelser (UKU) Side Effect Rating Scale. Multivariable regression analysis was used to evaluate the influence of sex, age, body weight, body mass index (BMI), and fluvoxamine dose on fluvoxamine serum concentrations. Results: The study included 70 youths (age = 6.7–19.6 years, OCD = 78%, mean fluvoxamine dose = 140.4 (range = 25–300) mg/d). A weak positive correlation between daily dose and steady-state trough serum concentrations was found (r_s = 0.34, p = 0.004), with dose variation explaining 16.2% of serum concentration variability. Multivariable correlates explaining 25.3% of the variance of fluvoxamine concentrations included higher fluvoxamine dose and lower BMI. Considering responders with OCD, the estimated TRR for youths was 55–371 ng/mL, exceeding the TRR for adults with depression of 60–230 ng/mL. Discussion: These preliminary data contribute to the definition of a TRR in youth with OCD treated with fluvoxamine and identify higher BMI as a moderator of lower fluvoxamine concentrations. Full article

Mental activity is capable of processing analytical data (mathematics, physics, socio-political science, philosophy, etc.) similar to computer software. At the same time, mental activity largely depends on the brain, which works like a hard component of a computer. While the computer stores data on a physical medium, mental activity and data are supported by physiological mechanisms that are constantly operating (both in wakefulness and sleep). For this reason, the lack of brain oxygenation even for short periods of time (5–10 minutes) causes the loss of all data, including the disappearance of the individual's existence as a mental entity. This means that psycho-physiological mechanisms that run continuously can accumulate malfunctions, but also that they can be interfered with, for example by coffee. We have presented in previous articles the similarity between computer operation and mental activity. This brief review is a synthesis of published articles and, at the same time, a preamble to an SSRI-based pharmacological approach capable of resetting mental activity (by restoring mental patterning) but without interrupting, losing or altering existing mental data. Full article

Depression is the major mental illness which causes along with loss of interest in daily life, a feeling of hopelessness, appetite or weight changes, anger and irritability. Due to the hepatic first-pass metabolism, the absolute bioavailability of fluvoxamine (FVM) after oral administration is about 50%. By avoiding the pre-systemic metabolism, nasal delivery would boost bioavailability of FVM. Additionally, the absorption is anticipated to occur more quickly than it would via the oral route because of the existence of microvilli and high vasculature. A nonionic surfactant, cholesterol and an arachidonic acid-carboxymethyl chitosan (AA-CMCS) conjugate were used to develop FVM-loaded novasomes. To investigate the effects of surfactant concentration, AA-CMCS conjugate concentration and stirring speed on the novasomes’ characteristics, a Box–Behnken design was used. The dependent variables chosen were zeta potential, polydispersity index and particle size. The AA-CMCS conjugate was confirmed by ¹H-NMR and FTIR. Using Design Expert software (version 7; Stat-Ease Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA), novasomes were further optimized. The chosen optimal formulation (NAC8) was made up of AA-CMCS conjugate, Span 60 and cholesterol. Particle size, zeta potential and PDI values for NAC8 formulation were 101 nm, −35 mV and 0.263, respectively. The NAC8 formulation’s DSC and TGA analysis demonstrated that the medication had been uniformly and amorphously distributed throughout the novasomes. The NAC8 formulation showed 99% and 90% FVM release and permeation, respectively, and the novasome adherence time was 24 h. An improved antidepressant effect along with five-fold increase in bioavailability of FVM was observed after trans-nasal administration of NAC8 formulation compared to the reference commercially available Flumin^® tablets. FVM-loaded novasomes administered via the nasal route may therefore constitute an advancement in the management of depression. Full article

Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with anti-inflammatory properties, has gained attention as a repurposed drug to treat COVID-19. We aimed to explore the potential benefit of fluvoxamine on outpatients with early SARS-CoV-2 infection. We performed a retrospective study of fluvoxamine adult outpatients with symptomatic COVID-19 disease of early onset (<5 days), in the context of an infectious diseases private practice, between September–December 2021, in Greece. Patients with disease duration ≥5 days, dyspnea and/or hypoxemia with oxygen saturation <94% in room air and pregnancy were excluded from the analysis. In total, 103 patients, 54 males/49 females with a median age of 47 years (39–56), were included in this study. Patient characteristics were balanced before and after the introduction of fluvoxamine. Two patients in the fluvoxamine arm (3.8%; 95% CI 0.4–13) had clinical deterioration compared to 8 patients in the standard of care group (16%; 95% CI 7.2–29.1, p < 0.04). After controlling for age, sex, body mass index > 30 and vaccination status, fluvoxamine was independently associated with a lower risk of clinical deterioration (adj. OR 0.12; 95% CI 0.02–0.70, p < 0.02). Adding on fluvoxamine to treatment for early symptomatic COVID-19 patients may protect them from clinical deterioration and hospitalization, and it is an appealing low-cost, low-toxicity option in the community setting and warrants further investigation. Full article