Next Article in Journal
PCR and Magnetic Bead-Mediated Target Capture for the Isolation of Short Interspersed Nucleotide Elements in Fishes
Previous Article in Journal
Bufalin Induces Lung Cancer Cell Apoptosis via the Inhibition of PI3K/Akt Pathway
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Post-Treatment with 75% (v/v) Ethanol Vapor on the Properties of SF/P(LLA-CL) Nanofibrous Scaffolds

College of Materials and Textile Engineering, Jiaxing University, Zhejiang 314001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13(2), 2036-2047; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13022036
Submission received: 10 January 2012 / Revised: 31 January 2012 / Accepted: 2 February 2012 / Published: 14 February 2012

Abstract

:
In order to improve the water-resistant ability of silk fibroin (SF) and SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering applications, 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor was used to post-treat electrospun nanofibers. SEM indicated that the treated SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds maintained a nanofibrous structure and possessed good water-resistant ability. Characterization of 13C CP-MAS NMR clarified that 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor could induce SF conformation from random coil or α-helix to β-sheet. Although the water contact showed that treated SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds were hydrophobic, the water uptake demonstrated that their hydrophilicity was greatly superior to those of pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds. Furthermore, the treated SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds, both in dry state and wet state, could retain good mechanical properties. Therefore, 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor treatment might be an ideal method to treat SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds for biomedical applications.

1. Introduction

Natural extracellular matrix(ECM)is composed of a cross-linked porous network of nano-sized multifibril collagens embedded in glycosaminoglycans [1,2]. Electrospinning has been broadly recognized as a unique and facile technique for producing nanofibers, which could physically biomimic the structure of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of native tissues [3,4].
Silk fibroin (SF) is an attractive natural fibrous protein for tissue engineering applications such as skin, bone, cartilage, vascular blood and neve repair due to its unique properties including good biocompatibility and biodegradability, low inflammatory response and commercial availability at relatively low cost [58]. However, electrospun SF nanofibrous scaffolds possess weak mechanical properties. In tissue engineering, the electrospun scaffolds should physically resemble the nanofibrous features of extracellular matrix (ECM) with suitable mechanical properties for maintaining the stability of the scaffolds before the cells can produce their own ECM [9]. In order to improve mechanical properties, we have successfully fabricated electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering application. All results demonstrated that they not only greatly promoted cells growth but also possessed good mechanical properties [10,11]. However, SF component of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds without any modification was sensitive to water and thus could not keep its structure when used as tissue engineering scaffolds. Therefore, it is necessary to post-treat in order to enhance their ability of water resistance.
The structure of SF nanofibrous matrices was transformed from random coils or helix (silk I) to β-sheet (silk II) through the post-treatment methods of methanol and ethanol soaking, or their vapor and water vapor treatment [1215]. To date, we found 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor treatment process not only induced silk fibroin conformation from random coils to β-sheet, but also was an effective sterilization approach to SF nanofibrous scaffolds [16]. Such a method is advantageous for nanofibrous matrices containing bioactive materials for tissue engineering applications, which could avoid bioactive materials loss to a large extent in post-treatment and sterilization process.
In the present study, electrospun SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds with different weight ratios were treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. The properties of nanofibrous scaffolds, after being treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor, such as morphologies, hydrophilicity and mechanical properties were evaluated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Nanofibrous Morphologies Before and After Treatment

SEM micrographs and diameter distributions of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds before and after being treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor were shown in Figures 1 and 2. Compared with non-treated nanofibers, the morphologies of treated pure SF nanofibers and SF/(PLLA-CL) blended nanofibers (the weight ratio of 75:25 and 50:50) had no obvious difference. However, treated SF/ (PLLA-CL) blended nanofibers with a weight ratio of 25:75 experienced greater change and most of the nanofibers were connected to each other. The effect might be caused by the fact that P(LLA-CL), a good visco-clastic copolymer, was swollen by the ethanol vapor. The average diameters of treated nanofibers enhanced in comparison with non-treated relevant nanofibers. SEM micrographs of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) nanofibrous scaffolds after soaking in deionized water for four days were shown in Figure 3. During the experiment, the non-treated nanofibrous scaffolds were found to shrink immediately after being soaked in deionized water. As shown in Figure 3a, the nanofibers were obviously swollen and bonded with each other. However, the treated nanofibrous scaffolds after being soaked in water still maintained good morphologies. The results indicated that 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor was effective to treat SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibers. Thus, this method meets the needs to maintain nanofibrous structure to biomimic ECM after treatment

2.2. Structure Analysis of Nanofibrous Scaffolds Before and After Treatment

The secondary structure of Bombyx mori silk fibroin is composed of the major conformations including random coils or helix (silk I) and β-sheet (silk II) [17]. The β-sheet structure can be identified by the 13C chemical shifts of Gly (glycine), Ser (serine) and Ala (alanine) that are indicative of β-sheet conformations. Particularly, the chemical shift of alanyl Cβ is an excellent indicator of the silk fibroin conformation [18,19]. The 13C NMR spectra for electrospun and treated SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) blended nanofibers with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor were shown in Figure 4. The chemical shift of Ala Cβ in SF nanofibers varied from 16.7ppm for random coils or helix to 19.8 ppm for β-sheet conformation after treatment with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. The peak at 19.9 ppm was appeared in 13C NMR spectra of SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) blended nanofibers after treatment with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor, which was the chemical shift of Ala Cβ for β-sheet conformation. Furthermore, the peak at 172.0 ppm for carbonyl carbons split into a doublet after being treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. The split was due to conformation from random coil to β-sheet [19]. The results demonstrated that the conformation of SF converted from random coil to β-sheet after being treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor.

2.3. The Hydrophilicity of Nanofibrous Scaffolds

The hydrophilic-hydrophobic property of nanofibrous scaffolds was evaluated by static water contact angle and water uptake. The former reflected transient hydrophilic-hydrophobic property of material surface, and the latter reflected hydrophilic-hydrophobic property of the material surface and internal body in a relatively long period. The water contact angle and water uptake of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with different weight ratios before and after being treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor were shown in Table 1. Before treatment, pure SF nanofibrous scaffolds showed ultra-hydrophilicity because of its hydrophilic groups and random coils conformation. The pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds showed an angle around 120°, indicating that P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds were hydrophobic. With the increasing ratio of SF from 25 to 75 in the blended nanofibrous scaffolds, the water contact angles of the nanofibrous scaffolds decreased from 87.9° to 75.5°. The hydrophobility of P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds could be transformed to hydrophilicity by introducing SF ingredient. After treatment, the water contact angle of pure SF nanofibrous scaffolds was 49.5° and still possessed good hydrophilicity. More interestingly, the results of the water contact angle showed that the blended nanofibrous scaffolds with the weight ratios from 75:25 to 25:75 transformed from hydrophilicity to hydrophobility, and the water contact angle of nanofibrous scaffolds with the weight ratio of 50:50 achieved maximum (130.5°), and then began to decrease. The possible reasons were listed as follows: (1) silk fibroin conformation transformed from random coil (soluble in water) to β-sheet (insoluble in water) after treatment; (2) The relative shrinkage of nanofibrous scaffolds after treatment led to the decrease of pore diameter and porosity; (3) silk fibroin of β-sheet structure possessed high crystallinity, but P(LLA-CL) was a kind of good elastomer. Therefore, as the blended ratio was 50:50, the surface of nanofibers could become rough, which resulted in greater water contact angle [20,21]. However, from the point of water uptake, the hydrophilicity of the blended nanofibous scaffolds after treatment had great superiority over pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds. The reason may be that SF molecules contained multiple hydrophilic functional groups, such as amido (−NH2), carboxyl (−COOH) and hydroxyl (−OH). In addition, pure SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds presented larger pore diameter and higher specific surface area in comparison with pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds [10]. Such materials may be conducive to vascular regeneration, because there are weak interactions between hydrophobic surface with lower surface free energy and ingredients in blood, which could display excellent anticoagulant activity [22]. Meanwhile, over a relatively long period, the blended SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds possessed good hydrophilicity, which could be beneficial to cell adhesion, proliferation and migration.

2.4. Mechanical Properties of Nanofibrous Scaffolds Before and After Treatment

The typical tensile stress-strain curves of SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds with varied weight ratios before and after treatment with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor were shown in Figure 5. The average elongation at break and the average tensile strength of each specimen were summarized in Table 2. Figure 5 and Table 2 showed that the pure SF nanofibrous scaffolds were typical brittle fracture and the average elongation at break was only 3.85% ± 0.30 and the average tensile strength was 2.72 ± 0.60 MPa. With increasing the blended ratio of P(LLA-CL) to SF in the range from 25 to 75, the nanofibrous scaffolds transformed from brittle to flexible and both the elongation at break and the average tensile strength increased obviously. Furthermore, the yield point appeared at the weight ratios of 75:25 and 50:50. After treatment, the average elongation at break and the average tensile strength of pure SF nanofibrous scaffolds increased slightly. In tensile test, we found that pure SF nanofibrous scaffolds ruptured easily at two terminals near fixture due to its friability to result in the error of measurement. For SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with different weight ratios, the average elongation at break decreased to some extent but the average tensile strength had no obvious difference. This was mainly caused by the intermolecular and intramolecular covalent bonds and the physical entanglements formed among nanofibers, whereby the decrease of sliding in chains and among fibers led to decreasing the elongation at break.
Mechanical tests of pure SF scaffolds in wet state cannot be carried out because the tenacity is too poor to be measured. In comparison with treated blended nanofibrous scaffolds in dry state, all average tensile strength decreased to some extent, whereas all the average elongation at break obviously increased in wet state, and yield point disappeared in stress–strain curves (Figure 6). In addition, compared with pure P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds in dry state, the average tensile strength decreased and the average elongation at break increased in wet state to some extent. The plasticizing effect of water might be contributed to the tensile behavior of soaked SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds.

3. Experimental Section

3.1. Materials

Cocoons of Bombyx mori silkworm were kindly supplied by Jiaxing Silk Co. Ltd. (China). A copolymer of P(LLA-CL) (50:50), which has a composition of 50 mol% l-lactide, was used. 1,1,1,3,3,3,-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP) was purchased from Daikin Industries Ltd. (Japan). Ethanol was obtained from Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (China)

3.2. Post-Treatment of SF/P(LLA-CL) Nanofibrous Scaffolds

Pure SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds were fabricated according to reference [10] and then were treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor to induce a β-sheet conformational transition, which resulted in insolubility in water. Briefly, 75% (v/v) ethalnol vapor-treated samples were prepared by placing SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds in a desiccator saturated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor at 25 °C for 6 h and then dried in a vacuum at room temperature for 24 h.

3.3. Characterization

The morphology was observed with a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) (JSM-5600, Japan) at an accelerated voltage of 15 KV. The mean fiber diameters were estimated using an image analysis software (Image-J, National Institutes of Health, USA) and calculated by selecting 100 fibers randomly observed on the SEM images.
The 13C CP-MAS NMR spectra of the electrospun scaffolds were obtained on NMR spectrometer (Bruker AV400, Switzerland) with a 13C resonance frequency of 100 MHz, contact time of 1.0 ms, pulse delay time of 4.0 s.

3.4. Contact Angle Measurements and Water Uptake

Surface wettabilities of the electrospun scaffolds were characterized by the water contact angle measurement. The images of the droplet on the membrane were visualized through the image analyzer (OCA40, Datephysics Co, Germany) and the angles between the water droplet and the surface were measured. The measurement used distilled water as the reference liquid and was automatically dropped onto the electrospun scaffolds. To confirm the uniform distribution of blend nanofibrous scaffolds, the water contact angle was measured 3 times from different positions and an average value was calculated by statistical method.
The dry treated different scaffolds (50 mm × 50 mm) were immersed into distilled water for 24 h at room temperature. The wet scaffolds were immediately weighed after removing the surface water with a filter paper. The water uptake was calculated according to the following equation:
w a t e r u p t a k e ( % ) = w w - w d w d × 100 %
Where Ww and Wd were the weight of wet and dry scaffolds, respectively.

3.5. Mechanical Property Measurements

Mechanical properties were obtained by applying tensile test loads to specimens prepared from the electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) scaffolds. In this study, three specimens were prepared according to the method described by Huang et al. [23]. Mechanical properties were tested by a materials testing machine (H5K-S, Hounsfield, England) at the temperature of 20 °C, a relative humidity of 65% and an elongation speed of 10 mm/min. The specimen thicknesses were measured using a digital micrometer, having a precision of 1 μm. Wet state samples were also measured after soaking electrospun scaffolds in distilled water for 1 h and the water on the surface of scaffolds was blotted with filter paper. The specimen thicknesses were measured using a digital micrometer, having a precision of 0.01 mm.

4. Conclusions

In the present study, to improve the stability of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds in vitro and in vivo, the conformation of SF in SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds was greatly altered from random coil or α-helix to β-sheet by treating samples with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. The results of SEM and water resistant test showed 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor was a predominant post-treatment method. Treated SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds still possessed excellent hydrophilicity and mechanical properties. Such a method might be beneficial to tissue engineering scaffolds and as a vehicle for drugs.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the program of Zhejiang education office (Y201122407), The opened up foundation of Jiaxing Municipality innovation team “modern textile science and technology” (MTC2011-005), The key SRT program of Jiaxing University (851711007), Science Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2010C01020) Science and technology commission of Jiaxing municipality program (2010AY1089).

References

  1. Min, B.M.; Lee, G.; Kim, S.H.; Nam, Y.S.; Lee, T.S.; Park, W.H. Electrospinning of silk fibroin nanofibers and its effect on the adhesion and spreading of normal human keratinocytes and fibroblasts in vitro. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1289–1297. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, M.; Jin, H.J.; David, L.; Rutledge, G.C. Mechanical properties of electrospun silk fibers. Macromolecules 2004, 37, 6856–6864. [Google Scholar]
  3. Matthews, J.A.; Wnek, G.E.; Simpson, D.G.; Bowlin, G.L. Electrospinning of collagen nanofibers. Biomacromolecules 2002, 3, 232–238. [Google Scholar]
  4. Sell, S.A.; McClure, M.J.; Garg, K.; Wolfe, P.S.; Bowlin, G.L. Electrospinning of collagen/biopolymers for regenerative medicine and cardiovascular tissue engineering. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 2009, 61, 1007–1019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Horan, R.L.; Antle, K.; Collette, A.L.; Wang, Y.Z.; Huang, J.; Moreau, J.E.; Volloch, V.; Kaplan, D.L.; Altman, G.H. In vitro degradation of silk fibroin. Biomaterials 2005, 26, 3385–3393. [Google Scholar]
  6. Murphy, A.R.; John, P.S.; Kaplan, D.L. Modification of silk fibroin using diazonium coupling chemistry and the effects on hMSC proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 2829–2838. [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, X.H.; Reagan, M.R.; Kaplan, D.L. Electrospun silk biomaterial scaffolds for regenerative medicine. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev 2009, 61, 988–1006. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yang, Y.M.; Ding, F.; Wu, J.; Hu, W.; Liu, W.; Liu, J.; Gu, X.S. Development and evaluation of silk fibroin-based nerve grafts used for peripheral nerve regeneration. Biomaterials 2007, 28, 5526–5535. [Google Scholar]
  9. Murugan, R.; Ramakrishna, S. Design strategies of tissue engineering scaffolds with controlled fiber orientation. Tissue Eng 2007, 13, 1845–1866. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, K.H.; Wang, H.S.; Huang, C.; Su, Y.; Mo, X.M.; Ikada, Y. Fabrication of silk fibroin blended P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2010, 93A, 984–993. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wang, C.Y.; Zhang, K.H.; Fan, C.Y.; Mo, X.M.; Ruan, H.J.; Li, F.F. Aligned natural-synthetic polyblend nanofibers for peripheral nerve regeneration. Acta Biomater 2011, 7, 634–643. [Google Scholar]
  12. Jin, H.J.; Chen, J.S.; Karageorgiou, V.; Altman, G.H.; Kaplan, D.L. Human bone marrow stromal cell responses on electrospun silk fibroin mats. Biomaterials 2004, 25, 1039–1047. [Google Scholar]
  13. Li, C.M.; Vepari, C.R.; Jin, H.J.; Kim, H.J.; Kaplan, D.L. Electrospun silk-BMP-2 scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2006, 27, 3115–3124. [Google Scholar]
  14. Jeong, L.; Lee, K.Y.; Liu, J.W.; Park, W.H. Time-resolved structural investigation of regenerated silk fibroin nanofibers treated with solvent vapor. Int. J. Biolog. Macromol 2006, 38, 140–144. [Google Scholar]
  15. Min, B.M.; Lee, K.Y.; Park, W.H. Regenerated silk fibroin nanofibers: Water vapor-induced structural changes and their effects on the behavior of normal human cells. Macromol. Biosci 2006, 6, 285–292. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhang, K.H.; Fan, L.P.; Yan, Z.Y.; Yu, Q.Z.; Mo, X.M. Electrospun biomimic nanofibrous scaffolds of silk fibroin/hyaluronic acid for tissue engineering. Biomater. Sci. Polym. Ed 2012, in press. [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen, X.; Shao, Z.Z.; Marinkovic, N.S.; Miller, L.M.; Zhou, P.; Chance, M.R. Conformation transition kinetics of regenerated Bombyx mori silk fibroin membrane monitored by time-resolved FTIR spectroscopy. Biophys. Chem 2001, 89, 25–34. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhou, P.; Li, G.Y.; Shao, Z.Z.; Pan, X.Y.; Yu, T.Y. Structure of Bombyx mori silk fibroin based on the DFT chemical shift calculation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 12469–12476. [Google Scholar]
  19. Ruan, Q.X.; Zhou, P. Sodium ion effect on silk fibroin conformation characterized by solid-state NMR and generalized 2D NMR–NMR correlation. J. Mol. Struct 2008, 883, 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  20. Bartolo, L.D.; Bader, M.A.; Drioli, E. The influence of polymeric membrane surface free energy on cell metabolic functions. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med 2001, 12, 959–963. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lampin, M.; Warocquier-Clérout, R.; Legris, C.; Degrange, M.; Sigot-Luizard, M.F. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J. Biomed. Mater. Res 1997, 36, 99–108. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yan, J.I.; Chang, J.Y.; Xu, X.Q.; Zhang, S.N.; Chen, Y.R.; Fang, D.P. Advances in the antithrombogenicity of intravascular polyurethane catheters. Chem. Ind. Eng 2001, 18, 44–52. [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang, Z.M.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Ramakrishna, S.; Lim, C.T. Electrospinning and mechanical characterization of gelatin nanofibers. Polymer 2004, 45, 5361–5368. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. SEM images and diameter distributions of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibers with different ratios ((a, a′) 100:0; (b, b′) 75:25; (c, c′) 50:50; (d, d′) 25:75).
Figure 1. SEM images and diameter distributions of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibers with different ratios ((a, a′) 100:0; (b, b′) 75:25; (c, c′) 50:50; (d, d′) 25:75).
Ijms 13 02036f1
Figure 2. SEM images and diameter distributions of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibers with different weight ratios after being treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor ((a, a′) 100:0; (b, b′) 75:25; (c, c′) 50:50; (d, d′) 25:75).
Figure 2. SEM images and diameter distributions of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibers with different weight ratios after being treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor ((a, a′) 100:0; (b, b′) 75:25; (c, c′) 50:50; (d, d′) 25:75).
Ijms 13 02036f2
Figure 3. SEM images of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) nanofibers after being soaked in water ((a) non-treated; (b) treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor).
Figure 3. SEM images of electrospun SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) nanofibers after being soaked in water ((a) non-treated; (b) treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor).
Ijms 13 02036f3
Figure 4. 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of electrospun and treated SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) blended nanofibers with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. A, pure SF (a, non-treated; b, treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor); B, SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) ((a) non-treated; (b) treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor).
Figure 4. 13C CP/MAS NMR spectra of electrospun and treated SF and SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) blended nanofibers with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. A, pure SF (a, non-treated; b, treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor); B, SF/P(LLA-CL) (50:50) ((a) non-treated; (b) treated with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor).
Ijms 13 02036f4
Figure 5. The stress-strain curves of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with different weight ratios before and after treatment with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. ((a, a′) 100:0; (b, b′) 75:25; (c, c′) 50:50; (d, d′) 25:75).
Figure 5. The stress-strain curves of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with different weight ratios before and after treatment with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor. ((a, a′) 100:0; (b, b′) 75:25; (c, c′) 50:50; (d, d′) 25:75).
Ijms 13 02036f5
Figure 6. The stress-strain curves of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with different weight ratios in wet state. ((a) 75:25; (b) 50:50; (c) 25:75; (d) 100:0).
Figure 6. The stress-strain curves of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with different weight ratios in wet state. ((a) 75:25; (b) 50:50; (c) 25:75; (d) 100:0).
Ijms 13 02036f6
Table 1. Water contact angle and water uptake of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with various blended ratios. Data are representatives of three independent experiments and all data are used as means ± SD.
Table 1. Water contact angle and water uptake of SF/P(LLA-CL) nanofibrous scaffolds with various blended ratios. Data are representatives of three independent experiments and all data are used as means ± SD.
SampleSF:P(LLA-CL) weight ratios

100:075:2550:5025:750:100
Water contactUntreated——75.5 ± 1.278.4 ± 2.087.9 ± 2.7120 ± 3.2
angle (°)Treated49.5 ± 2.8121.9 ± 1.5130.5 ± 0.9121.8 ± 1.9——
Water uptake (%)Treated353.67 ± 3.45.45259.79 ± 3.21200.67 ± 4.014.01130.74 ± 2.092.0910.92 ± 2.762.76
Table 2. Mechanical properties of SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds with various blended ratios before and after treatment with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor as well as in wet state. Data are representatives of three independent experiments and all data are used as means ± SD.
Table 2. Mechanical properties of SF/P(LLA-CL) blended nanofibrous scaffolds with various blended ratios before and after treatment with 75% (v/v) ethanol vapor as well as in wet state. Data are representatives of three independent experiments and all data are used as means ± SD.
SF/P(LLA-CL) weight ratioAverage specimen thickness (mm)Average elongation at break (%)Average tensile strength (MPa)
100:0DryUntreated0.050 ± 0.0053.85 ± 0.302.72 ± 0.60
Treated0.054 ± 0.0054.50 ± 0.806.39 ± 0.78
Wet
75:25DryUntreated0.082 ± 0.00698.86 ± 16.985.28 ± 1.25
Treated0.055 ± 0.00647.95 ± 13.075.28 ± 0.37
Wet0.070 ± 0.00290.93 ± 5.892.25 ± 0.30
50:50DryUntreated0.075 ± 0.004168.75 ± 29.705.62 ± 1.61
Treated0.078 ± 0.002132.90 ± 16.035.96 ± 0.29
Wet0.088 ± 0.003215.75 ± 14.604.98 ± 0.42
25:75DryUntreated0.078 ± 0.008279.67 ± 34.9810.60 ± 2.45
Treated0.082 ± 0.005232.79 ± 33.9912.59 ± 1.11
Wet0.072 ± 0.003369.16 ± 33.579.32 ± 1.03
0:100DryUntreated0.088 ± 0.005458.83 ± 19.356.29 ± 1.30
Treated
Wet0.068 ± 0.004479.11 ± 50.185.04 ± 0.72

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, K.-H.; Ye, Q.; Yan, Z.-Y. Influence of Post-Treatment with 75% (v/v) Ethanol Vapor on the Properties of SF/P(LLA-CL) Nanofibrous Scaffolds. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 2036-2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13022036

AMA Style

Zhang K-H, Ye Q, Yan Z-Y. Influence of Post-Treatment with 75% (v/v) Ethanol Vapor on the Properties of SF/P(LLA-CL) Nanofibrous Scaffolds. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2012; 13(2):2036-2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13022036

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Kui-Hua, Qing Ye, and Zhi-Yong Yan. 2012. "Influence of Post-Treatment with 75% (v/v) Ethanol Vapor on the Properties of SF/P(LLA-CL) Nanofibrous Scaffolds" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 13, no. 2: 2036-2047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms13022036

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop