Next Article in Journal
Liver Transplantation and Gut Microbiota Profiling in a Child Colonized by a Multi-Drug Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A New Approach to Move from Antibiotic to “Eubiotic” Control of Microbial Resistance
Next Article in Special Issue
Sphingosine-1-Phosphate Receptor 1 Is Involved in Non-Obese Diabetic Mouse Thymocyte Migration Disorders
Previous Article in Journal
Insights into the Structure, Function, and Ligand Discovery of the Large Neutral Amino Acid Transporter 1, LAT1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Low Serum Levels of (Dihydro-)Ceramides Reflect Liver Graft Dysfunction in a Real-World Cohort of Patients Post Liver Transplantation
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms19051279
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

S1P4 Regulates Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis in Mice but Is Dispensable for Canonical IgE-Mediated Responses in Mast Cells

by
Joseph M. Kulinski
1,
Richard L. Proia
2,
Elisabeth M. Larson
1,
Dean D. Metcalfe
1 and
Ana Olivera
1,*
1
Mast Cell Biology Section, Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
2
Genetics of Development and Disease Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(5), 1279; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051279
Submission received: 9 March 2018 / Revised: 18 April 2018 / Accepted: 18 April 2018 / Published: 25 April 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sphingolipids: Signals and Disease)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mast cells are key players in the development of inflammatory allergic reactions. Cross-linking of the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FcεRI) on mast cells leads to the generation and secretion of the sphingolipid mediator, sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) which is able, in turn, to transactivate its receptors on mast cells. Previous reports have identified the expression of two of the five receptors for S1P on mast cells, S1P1 and S1P2, with functions in FcεRI-mediated chemotaxis and degranulation, respectively. Here, we show that cultured mouse mast cells also express abundant message for S1P4. Genetic deletion of S1pr4 did not affect the differentiation of bone marrow progenitors into mast cells or the proliferation of mast cells in culture. A comprehensive characterization of IgE-mediated responses in S1P4-deficient bone marrow-derived and peritoneal mouse mast cells indicated that this receptor is dispensable for mast cell degranulation, cytokine/chemokine production and FcεRI-mediated chemotaxis in vitro. However, interleukin-33 (IL-33)-mediated enhancement of IgE-induced degranulation was reduced in S1P4-deficient peritoneal mast cells, revealing a potential negative regulatory role for S1P4 in an IL-33-rich environment. Surprisingly, genetic deletion of S1pr4 resulted in exacerbation of passive systemic anaphylaxis to IgE/anti-IgE in mice, a phenotype likely related to mast cell-extrinsic influences, such as the high circulating levels of IgE in these mice which increases FcεRI expression and consequently the extent of the response to FcεRI engagement. Thus, we provide evidence that S1P4 modulates anaphylaxis in an unexpected manner that does not involve regulation of mast cell responsiveness to IgE stimulation.

1. Introduction

Sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) is a sphingolipid mediator that critically regulates multiple cellular processes including proliferation, survival, chemotaxis and immune regulation. S1P elicits these functions by binding five known G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), designated as S1P1–5, or by acting on its intracellular targets [1]. Unlike S1P1–3 receptors which are expressed ubiquitously, S1P4 exhibits preferential expression in lymphoid and hematopoietic organs and cells [2]. S1P4 has been reported to regulate neutrophil counts in circulation [3] and trafficking [4,5], dendritic cell function [6] and to modulate certain lymphocyte functions [6,7,8,9]. Global genetic deletion of S1P4 in mice results in elevated serum IgE levels, enhanced T helper 2 (Th2)-and Th17-dominated immune responses and diminished Th1-responses [6]. However, the role of S1P4 in immune cells is still not well understood.
Mast cells are tissue-resident cells commonly associated with Th2 immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Mast cells recognize IgE-bound antigen (Ag) through the high-affinity receptor for IgE (FcεRI) expressed at the plasma membrane. Aggregation of FcεRI by IgE/Ag initiates signaling cascades leading to the release of both early and late mediators that cause immediate allergic reactions and contribute to chronic inflammation [10,11]. In addition to FcεRI, mast cells express other cell surface receptors that allow mast cells to respond to signals in the microenvironment that modulate FcεRI-mediated responses [12,13]. These signals and their receptors may be significant factors in the susceptibility to, or severity of, anaphylaxis in allergic individuals [14].
Elevated S1P in inflamed tissues or produced endogenously by mast cells is considered one of the factors regulating FcεRI-induced responses [15,16]. Previous studies in mast cells have indicated that following FcεRI-mediated activation, S1P is generated and induces ligand-dependent “transactivation” of S1P1 and S1P2 receptors expressed on these cells [17]. S1P1 transactivation is reported to mediate the migration of mast cells toward Ag [17,18]. S1P2 enhances FcεRI-induced degranulation, although its contributions to degranulation may depend on the type of mast cell studied and culture conditions used [17,18,19].
Here, we show that mouse mast cells express S1P4 receptor in addition to S1P1 and S1P2. Based on the Th2-skewed phenotype of mice lacking S1P4 and the role of S1P in regulating mast cell responses, we sought to better understand the role of S1P4 in FcεRI-mediated stimulation and allergic responses. As it will be shown, global genetic deletion of S1pr4 resulted in exacerbation of IgE-mediated systemic anaphylaxis, although S1P4 was dispensable for normal FcεRI-mediated activation in S1pr4-deficient cultured mast cells. Our data suggest that the enhanced anaphylaxis in mice lacking S1P4 is not directly linked to intrinsic alterations in mast cells, but instead may be secondary to the higher levels of IgE in vivo, which would promote membrane expression of FcεRI and thus a stronger stimulus. Our experiments also revealed an unexpected role for S1P4 in the negative regulation of innate mast cell degranulation in response to co-stimulation with IgE/Ag and IL-33 [20].

2. Results

2.1. S1P4 Is Expressed in Mast Cells

Mast cells express mRNA coding for S1P1 and S1P2, receptors known to contribute to FcεRI-mediated mast cell responses [16,17]. We found that, in addition to the expression of S1pr1 and S1pr2, mouse mast cells contained mRNA for S1P4 (but not S1P3 or S1P5) at comparable or higher relative levels than for S1P2 (Figure 1). Since S1P4 may play redundant, antagonistic or unique roles in mast cells compared to the other S1P receptors, we reasoned it was possible that deletion of this receptor could affect the expression of the other S1P receptors, which could in turn skew the functional outcome. However, the mRNA expression of the other S1P receptors in mast cells was not altered by S1pr4 deficiency (Figure S1A, open bars). As the role of S1P4 in mast cells has not been examined, we next sought to characterize the growth of mouse mast cells obtained from S1pr4-deficient mice.

2.2. Maturation and Proliferation of S1pr4-Deficient Mast Cells In Vitro

Bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMC) from S1pr4-deficient mice cultured in the presence of IL-3 and stem cell factor (SCF) differentiated with comparable kinetics to S1pr4+/+ BMMC, as evidenced by the increasing appearance over time in culture of a population of FcεRI and CD117 (KIT) double-positive cells, the characteristic cell surface markers of mast cells (Figure S1B top panel, and C). In addition, the absence of S1P4 had no significant effect on the total numbers of mast cells in culture (Figure S1B, bottom panel). Similar to BMMC, the growth and expansion of S1pr4-deficient mast cells obtained from peritoneal exudates (peritoneal-derived mast cells or PDMC), which are considered more mature than BMMC [21,22,23] and with functional characteristics of innate mast cells [24], was no different from S1pr4+/+ cells (Figure S1D). These data indicate that S1P4 receptor expression is not required for either the expansion of mature mast cells from the peritoneum or the in vitro differentiation/expansion of mast cells from bone marrow precursors.

2.3. Degranulation, Cytokine and Chemokine Responses in S1pr4-Deficient Mast Cells In Vitro

We next tested whether S1P4 might modulate degranulation in response to FcεRI stimulation in BMMC and PDMC cultures. Our analysis showed that S1pr4-deficient cultures bound comparable levels of IgE on the cell surface (Figure S2A–C) and showed similar degranulation to that of S1pr4+/+ cultures in response to all concentrations of Ag tested (Figure 2A). S1pr4-deficient and S1pr4+/+ cells also exhibited identical responses to pharmacological stimulation by thapsigargin, an inhibitor of Ca2+ uptake into the ER that causes increased cytosolic Ca2+ accumulation (Figure 2B). Further, degranulation in response to IgE/Ag was also similar in both groups of cultures in the presence of SCF (45.094 ± 0.862% in S1pr4+/+ and 42.443 ± 0.804% in S1pr4−/− stimulated with 25 ng/mL Ag + 20 ng/mL SCF), which is known to synergize with FcεRI-mediated responses [14,25].
Cultured PDMC degranulate in response to a diverse group of cationic compounds, referred to as “mast cell secretagogues” such as substance P and compound 48/80, through a class of GPCRs known as Mas-related gene (Mrg) receptors expressed on these cells [24,26,27]. Degranulation of S1pr4-deficient PDMC in response to 5 to 50 µg/mL of compound 48/80 was indistinguishable from S1pr4+/+ mast cells (27.356 ± 8.997% in S1pr4+/+ and 20.334 ± 4.831% in S1pr4−/− stimulated with 10 µg/mL compound 48/80). In contrast, FcεRI-induced degranulation in the presence of IL-33, a cytokine that orchestrates a variety of allergic inflammatory conditions through innate immune cells [20,28] and potentiates FcεRI mediated mast cell responses [25,29], was further potentiated in S1pr4-deficient PDMC compared to S1pr4+/+ (Figure 2C).
These effects were not observed in BMMC (15 ± 2% in S1pr4+/+ and 17 ± 2% in S1pr4−/− stimulated with 25 ng/mL Ag and 1 ng/mL IL-33). Overall, the data indicates that S1P4 is dispensable for degranulation initiated through either FcεRI or the Mas-related GPCRs but diminishes the potentiating effects of IL-33 on FcεRI-mediated responses in innate mast cells.
Mast cells also generate a variety of cytokines and chemokines following activation of FcεRI as a result of enhanced gene expression, with IL-6 and TNF-α representing two of the most abundant and best characterized cytokines produced by BMMC [21,30,31]. S1pr4 deficiency did not significantly alter FcεRI-induced transcription of IL-6 and TNF-α (relative Il6 expression was 0.05609 ± 0.01661% in S1pr4+/+ and 0.0493 ± 0.01077% in S1pr4−/− stimulated with 25 ng/mL) or their release into the media (Figure 2D,E) at any of the concentrations of Ag tested. To determine whether transactivation of S1P4 might regulate the expression of other cytokines or chemokines induced by FcεRI stimulation, as has been reported for S1P2, we performed a qPCR array to examine the relative expression levels of 84 key cytokines and chemokines with critical roles in various immune responses. From those whose expression was highest and/or induced by FcεRI activation, three cytokines (IL-2, IL-5 and IL-9) and three chemokines (Ccl12, Ccl22, Ccl24) exhibited relative expression levels that were on average ≥2-fold higher in stimulated S1pr4−/− BMMC than in stimulated S1pr4+/+ controls (Table S1). The relative expression levels for several of the genes were highly variable between replicates probably due to the low abundance of these transcripts (100–1000 fold less abundant than those for IL-6) and the same was true, in general, for the fold change in expression between stimulated S1pr4−/− and S1pr4+/+ cells in separate cultures and thus, to confirm the measurements on these cytokines/chemokines, we employed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) technology for enhanced sensitivity and reproducibility [32]. We also determined IL-6 expression by ddPCR for comparison, as a negative control, and Ccl1 since this was one of the most highly upregulated messages in both S1pr4−/− and S1pr4+/+ after stimulation and the average fold increase in S1pr4−/− compared to S1pr4+/+ cells was nearly 2 fold (Table S1). Using ddPCR we were able to accurately quantify those low and high abundance transcripts to definitively conclude that activated S1pr4−/− BMMC have indistinguishable responses to those of S1pr4+/+ cells in terms of cytokine/chemokine mRNA expression (Figure 2F,G). Only IL-2 and IL-5 showed a trend towards higher expression in stimulated S1pr4−/− although this was not statistically significant. Altogether our data demonstrates no role for S1P4 expression in the normal functioning of FcεRI-mediated responses in vitro.

2.4. Regulation of Mast Cell Chemotaxis by S1P4

Various S1P receptors modulate chemotaxis in a variety of cell types [33]. In mast cells, S1P1 mediates migration toward Ag while overexpression of S1P2 appears to antagonize this process [17,18]. Transwell migration of BMMC towards Ag (Figure 3A) or towards SCF (Figure 3B) were minimally affected by the absence of S1P4 expression. Addition of 100 nM S1P did enhance the number of S1pr4+/+ BMMCs exhibiting specific migration towards Ag but had no effect on S1p4-deficient BMMC (Figure 3A). Thus, under these specific conditions, there was a trend towards reduced chemotaxis toward Ag in S1p4-deficient BMMC. However, the data suggest that the role of S1P4 in chemotactic mast cell migration is at best marginal.

2.5. Systemic Anaphylaxis in S1pr4−/− Mice

Mast cells grown and differentiated in the presence of IL-3 and SCF in culture may react differently to antigenic stimulation than cells undergoing activation during immune responses in vivo. To assess mast cell responses in S1pr4−/− mice in vivo, we induced an anaphylactic response using a model of passive systemic anaphylaxis (PSA). S1pr4−/− and S1pr4+/+ mice were sensitized with 3 µg of IgE to saturate IgE receptors prior to challenge with anti-IgE. Crosslinking of FcεRI on mast cells in this manner results in anaphylaxis, which is manifested in mice by a drop in body temperature. S1pr4−/− mice exhibited increased hypothermia compared with S1pr4+/+ controls that was most apparent early on and was maintained throughout the course of induced anaphylaxis (Figure 4A). Histamine is a key vascular mediator released by mast cells that elicits anaphylactic symptoms in mice [34]. Previous reports indicate that anaphylactic reactions in S1pr4−/− mice are indistinguishable from those in S1pr4+/+ mice when anaphylaxis is induced by systemic administration of exogenous histamine [35], suggesting that the differences observed in absence of S1P4 in this study following administration of IgE/anti-IgE are likely not due to an overall change in sensitivity to histamine. In addition, exacerbated anaphylaxis in S1pr4−/− mice was unlikely due to a higher mast cell burden since the number of metachromatic mast cells present in toluidine blue stained tissues is similar to that observed in S1pr4+/+ controls (Figure 4B,C).
Since S1pr4−/− mice exhibit elevated levels of circulating IgE ([6] and Figure S2D) and IgE is known to regulate the amount of mast cell surface FcεRI, which in turn can determine the extent of mast cell responses [36], we measured whether the expression of FcεRI on mast cells in peritoneal exudates from S1pr4−/− mice was altered. Staining with a mAb specific for FcεRI (MAR-1) along with anti-IgE to measure signal from both occupied and unoccupied FcεRI [37] suggested that peritoneal mast cells ex vivo from unchallenged S1pr4−/− mice express higher levels of FcεRI at the plasma membrane compared to S1pr4+/+ control cells (Figure S2E,F). Since S1P4-deficient PDMC or BMMC, once removed from the influence of higher IgE levels, show no differences in FcεRI expression (Figure S2A–C) or intrinsic alterations in their responses (Figure 2), it is reasonable to surmise that the exacerbated anaphylactic responses in S1pr4−/− mice could partly be attributed to an increase in the expression levels of FcεRI due to an exposure to relatively high IgE levels.

3. Discussion

The importance and complexity of S1P signaling during allergic immune responses continues to emerge as we gain a greater understanding of how the various S1P receptors influence immune regulation. Mice deficient in S1P4 exhibit an allergy-prone phenotype [6], although little is known regarding the contribution of mast cells or other cell types to this condition. S1P generated following FcεRI activation in mast cells induces ligand-dependent transactivation of S1P1 and S1P2 which contribute to specific IgE-mediated responses [17]. In this study, we show that the S1P4 receptor is expressed in murine mast cells and that genetic deletion of S1pr4 results in increased IgE-mediated anaphylaxis in mice. However, we find that the absence of S1P4 in the mast cell compartment does not cause alterations in IgE-mediated degranulation or cytokine/chemokine responses in vitro, and thus the increased anaphylactic responses seem to relate to mast cell-extrinsic influences in the S1pr4 deficient environment surrounding mast cells in vivo. Although S1P4 was dispensable for IgE-mediated signaling under standard culture conditions, in the context of IL-33 co-stimulation, IgE-mediated degranulation was negatively modulated by S1P4, a finding of relevance given the involvement of the IL-33-mast cell axis in allergic inflammation [20,38,39].
Previous reports have implicated S1P receptors, particularly S1P1, in the regulation of mast cell chemotaxis towards Ag [17,18]. This process is likely to be integral to allergic conditions such as bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis where mast cell accumulation in tissues is critical for the development of disease [40]. Inhibition of S1P production by mast cells [17,19,41], inhibition of S1P transport from mast cells to the extracellular medium [18], or knockdown of S1P1 [17], results in inhibition of mast cell chemotaxis towards Ag in vitro, supporting the concept that FcεRI triggering promotes mast cells migration via S1P generation, export and transactivation of the S1P1 receptor. Given that inhibition of Gi signaling, which functions downstream of both S1P1 and S1P4 [42], effectively blocks migration of mast cells towards Ag [17] and that signaling through both S1P1 and S1P4 receptors can affect actin dynamics through activation of the small GTPases Rac and Rho, respectively [43,44,45,46,47,48], a contributory role for S1P4 on mast cell chemotaxis might be expected. Even though S1P4 activates pathways involved in cell motility, it did not appear to have a relevant role in FcεRI-induced chemotaxis. Nevertheless, there was a trend towards reduced motility to Ag, and addition of S1P as a chemoattractant together with Ag promoted migration in S1pr4+/+ but not in S1pr4−/− BMMC and thus a minor role for S1P4 in mast cell chemotaxis is possible. In general, this would be in agreement with reports that examine other immune cell types and implicate S1P4 in a contributory, albeit less prominent chemotactic role alongside S1P1 [9,49,50].
Our studies did not support a role for S1P4 receptors in regulating effector responses of Ag-stimulated PDMC or BMMC in our normal culturing conditions (in the presence of SCF and IL-3). Of note, under similar conditions, S1P2 did not affect IgE-mediated responses in PDMC or BMMC [51], although when cultured in the presence of IL-3 alone, a contribution for S1P2 in FcεRI-induced responses was manifested [51], a role which was also reported in human mast cells [17,51,52]. It is considered that BMMC cultured in the presence of IL-3 without SCF may present a more mucosal-like phenotype [53] than mast cells cultured in IL-3 and SCF. This distinction is, however, tenuous and it is unclear what culture conditions would better represent the phenotype of mast cells resident in tissues. Given the critical role of SCF in the location of mast cells within tissues and for mast cell maturation [54,55,56], experimental conditions that include SCF should be preferable and thus, our findings argue against a significant role for S1P4 in regulating mast cell function under homeostatic conditions. We cannot exclude, however, the possibility that signaling elicited through S1P4 in combination with other environmental cues under normal or pathological conditions [57,58] could modulate mast cell responses. In fact, our findings indicated that S1P4 negatively modulates the synergistic effect of IL-33 on IgE-mediated degranulation. These findings deserve further investigation since IL-33 is emerging as a critical player orchestrating allergic inflammation through innate immune cells, including mast cells. Increases in IL-33 in the epithelia are caused by barrier defects, microbiome alterations, irritants, allergens and other substances [28]. In addition to its effects on mast cell cytokine production [25,29], IL-33 promotes mast cell degranulation-associated responses leading to exacerbated sensitization to food or airway allergens [38,39]. Further, proteases released by mast cells during allergic reactions enhance the inflammatory potential of IL-33 by cleaving IL-33 into more active fragments [59], constituting a positive feedback loop for inflammation. As mast cells can also downregulate IL-33 actions in other models of inflammation [20], a better understanding of the mechanisms and circumstances under which S1P4 modulates IL-33 actions in mast cells may be beneficial for learning how to tamper certain allergic conditions.
We show here that mast cell-dependent, FcεRI-mediated anaphylaxis is more severe in S1pr4−/− mice, particularly at early phases of the response. Similarly enhanced anaphylactic responses to IgE/Ag in S1pr2−/− mice were attributed to an impairment in the regulation of vascular tone during anaphylaxis in these mice and thus defective histamine clearance and recovery from anaphylaxis [35,51]. Indeed, S1pr2−/− mice also have more severe anaphylaxis in response to vascular mediators such as histamine and PAF [35,51,60], which are released from mast cells and mediate vascular and temperature changes associated with IgE-induced anaphylaxis. In contrast, anaphylaxis induced by histamine administration in S1pr4−/− mice was no different than that observed in S1pr4+/+ mice [35], suggesting that there are no significant alterations in the response to vascular mediators or in the recovery from anaphylaxis and implicating instead enhanced mast cell responses. The increased severity of anaphylaxis in S1pr4−/− mice was unexpected given that cultured mast cells lacking S1P4 had no significant intrinsic alterations in their IgE-mediated responses in vitro. The heightened anaphylactic responses might be in part attributed to elevated levels of circulating IgE in these mice ([6] and Figure S2D), since IgE levels are known to regulate cell surface FcεRI expression and mast cell responsiveness [36]. In support of this notion, peritoneal mast cells from S1pr4−/− mice expressed higher FcεRI levels than S1pr2+/+ controls ex vivo, unlike cultured S1pr4−/− mast cells in vitro that lack chronic exposure to IgE. However, we cannot exclude the possibility that complex and dynamic cues in the tissues of S1pr4−/− mice mold the phenotype of mast cells in a manner that cannot be recapitulated in vitro. There is also precedence for the notion that S1P4 may be indirectly influencing FcεRI-mediated mast cell degranulation in vivo through its documented function in other cell types [6,47,61].
In summary, our studies demonstrate that S1P4 is expressed in mast cells, but mast cell-intrinsic expression is dispensable for most IgE-mediated responses in vitro. We, however, unveil a modulatory role for S1P4 in the exacerbation of innate type mast cell degranulation by IL-33. This observation may be of importance and requires further study, especially in the context of allergic inflammation where IL-33 is key. S1P receptor expression and signaling is clearly important for allergic mast cell-mediated responses in vivo and studies employing mice that harbor conditional or tissue-specific S1pr4 deletion will be critical for further dissecting the role of this molecule and its biology in the context of complex immunologic responses.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Mice

Mice were maintained and used in accordance with NIH guidelines and animal study proposals approved by the NIAID (LAD2E; 1/12/2017) and NIDDK (K007-GDDB-15; 17/2/2015) animal care and use committee. S1pr4−/− mice and S1pr4+/+ mice (referred to as WT mice) were obtained from crossing heterozygous mating pairs (strain B6.129P2-S1pr4tm1Dgen/J) from the Jacksons Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine). Mice had been backcrossed to C57/BL6 at least 7 times and maintained at NIH vivaria. Genotyping was performed using the following primers: (5′-GGC CTA CGT GGT CAA CGT GCT G-3′), (5′-CCG TAG AGG CTC AGG ATA GCC AC-3′) and (5′-GAC GAG TTC TTC TGA GGG GAT CGA TC-3′) which distinguished a 379 bp fragment in the WT from a 605 bp fragment in samples where S1pr4 was deleted.

4.2. Mast Cell Cultures

Mouse bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMC) were differentiated from the marrow of tibias and femurs of S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− littermate mice and cultured for at least 6 weeks in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS, 1M HEPES, 100 U/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, 4 mM l-glutamine, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 μM 2-meraptoethanol, 20 ng/mL IL-3, 20 ng/mL stem cell factor (SCF) and non-essential amino acids, as described [22]. Under these conditions, the proportion of mast cells in culture increases overtime and by 4–6 weeks >98% of the cells are mast cells. Mast cell expand particularly after 20 days in culture, when already >85% of the cells are mast cells. The purity of mast cells in the cultures was monitored by assessing the percentage of cells expressing the receptor for SCF, CD117 (Kit) and the IgE receptor, FcεRI, by flow cytometry. Functional studies were conducted on cultures containing >95% double-positive mast cells as described [62]. The total number of mast cells was calculated as: (Absolute total cell count in the culture X percentage of mast cells (FcεRI+/CD117+))/100 for each time point.
Peritoneal mast cells (PDMC) obtained from the peritoneal lavage of these mice were expanded in culture for 2 to 3 weeks in the same culture media as BMMC [22,63,64].

4.3. Degranulation Assays

Degranulation was assessed by a colorimetric detection of the granule marker, β-hexosaminidase, as described [65]. Briefly, mast cells were sensitized with 100 ng/mL anti-DNP IgE (clone H1-DNPε-26.82) [66] overnight in cytokine-free medium. Cells (3 × 104 PDMC or 5 × 104 BMMC) were plated in 96-well 340 µL V-bottom polypropylene (Corning, New York, NY, USA) plates in 100 µL of HEPES buffer (10 mM HEPES, 137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 0.4 mM Na2HPO4·7H2O, 5.6 mM Glucose, 1.8 mM CaCl2·2H2O, 1.3 mM MgSO4·7H2O). Cells were stimulated for 30 min with the indicated concentrations of 2,4-Dinitrophenyl-Human Serum Albumin (DNP-HSA) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), compound 48/80 trihydrochloride (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) and/or recombinant mouse mature IL-33 (Ser 109 through Ile 266, Accession #AK075849) (eBioscience, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were then centrifuged and supernatants separated from the cell pellets. Fifty µL of the supernatants and cell pellets lysed in 200 µL of 0.1% Triton X were transferred to 96-well plates to determine β-hexosaminidase activity. Degranulation was expressed as the percentage of β-hexosaminidase activity released into the media compared to total cellular β-hexosaminidase activity.

4.4. Flow Cytometry

Cells were resuspended at 107 cells/mL in PBS + aqua live/dead stain (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were then washed and resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS + 2% FCS + 0.05% sodium azide) and a total of 106 cells (107 cells/mL) were incubated with anti-CD16/CD32 (clone 2.4G2—BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA), then stained with an optimal amount of antibody conjugate; anti-CD117-APC (1:500) (clone ACK2—eBioscience), anti-IgE-FITC (1:100) (clone R35-72—BD Bioscience), anti-FcεRI-FITC (1:200) or -PE (1:1000) (clone MAR-1—eBioscience). Data acquisition was performed on a LSR II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Sparks, MD, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).

4.5. Measurement of Cytokine Release

Mast cells (106/mL) were sensitized with anti-DNP IgE (100 ng/mL) overnight in culture media. Cells were washed ×3 and 106 cells plated in triplicate to 48-well plates in a volume of 1 mL of cytokine-free RPMI/well and stimulated with the indicated concentrations of DNP-HSA. After 4 h, supernatants were collected and IL-6 and TNF-α secretion was measured by ELISA (R & D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) as described [62].

4.6. RT-PCR and Gene Expression Analysis

Mast cells were sensitized and challenged with 25 ng/mL DNP-HSA (or media alone for unstimulated controls) as for cytokine release described above for 2 or 4 h, as indicated. Total RNA from 106 mast cells was isolated using the RNAeasy plus mini-kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions with inclusion of the QIAShredder step. RNA quantity and purity were determined using the NanoDrop ND-2000 (Nanodrop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA).
For qPCR analysis, 1 µg of total RNA was reverse-transcribed using the SuperScript III first-strand synthesis system with random hexamer primers (ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). cDNA and corresponding reactions in samples without reverse transcription were assessed, in triplicate, by real-time PCR using the CFX96 Sequence Detection System (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gene-specific cDNA was amplified using Taqman gene expression probes (Table S3). The threshold cycle method, i.e., ΔCT, was used to quantify the relative abundance of each cDNA, using corresponding Gapdh (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) levels for normalization [67]. The CT values in control samples without reverse-transcription did not exceed background levels.
For RT2 gene expression array analysis, cDNA was generated from total RNA (0.5 µg) using the RT2 First Strand Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) mixed with RT2 SYBR Green qPCR Master Mix (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) and aliquoted onto mouse cytokine & chemokine PCR-array plates (PAMM-150ZD-12—Qiagen). All steps were done according to the manufacturer’s protocol for the BioRad CFX96 Sequence Detection System. Data normalization was based on correcting all Ct values for the average Ct values of several consistently expressed housekeeping genes (HKGs) present on the array. Data was analyzed online using the manufacturer’s website (http://pcrdataanalysis.sabiosciences.com/pcr/arrayanalysis.php).
For droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) analysis, cDNA was generated from total RNA (160 ng) using the iScript Advanced cDNA synthesis kit for RT–qPCR (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). The PrimePCR ddPCR gene expression probe assay was carried out according to the manufacturer’s suggested protocol using Gapdh for high expressing transcripts or Hprt for low-expressing transcripts as reference probes (Table S2). Droplets for each sample were generated using a BioRad Dropplet generator and transferred to a 96-well PCR plate. PCR reactions in the droplets were performed utilizing a 2-step thermocycling protocol [95 °C × 10 min; 40 cycles × [(94 °C × 30 s, 60 °C × 60 s); 98 °C × 10 min, ramp rate set at 2.5 °C/s]] in a BioRad C1000 Touch thermocyler and the number of transcripts in each well determined using a QX100 Droplet Reader. Data was analyzed using QuantaSoft analysis software (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.7. Chemotaxis

S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− BMMC were incubated overnight in serum-free, cytokine-free RPMI supplemented with 0.04% fatty acid-free BSA (FAF-RPMI) with or without 100 ng/mL anti-DNP IgE (clone H1-DNPɛ-26.82) [66]. Cells were then washed twice and suspended in 100μl FAF-RPMI in the top wells of a 5 μm pore size Transwell plate (Costar, Tewksbury MA, USA) in triplicate for 30 min, with 600 μL FAF-RPMI in the lower chamber. The cells in the upper wells were then transferred to a test well containing 600 μL FAF-RPMI supplemented with the indicated concentrations of DNP-HSA, 10 ng/mL SCF or FAF-RPMI only as a negative control. Wells were incubated for 4 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Cells and media in the lower chamber were then spun down, resuspended with 15μl PBS and counted using a LUNA-FL cell counter (Logos Biosystems, Annandale, VA, USA). Total cells counts were calculated and averaged from 3 technical replicates for each experimental condition.

4.8. Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis

S1pr4+/+ or S1pr4−/− mice were sensitized (i.v.) with 3 μg DNP-specific IgE (clone H1-DNPɛ-26.82) [66] (0.2 mL volume) and challenged 24 h later by i.v. injection of 9 μg purified monoclonal rat anti-mouse IgE (BD Biosciences). IPTT Implantable electronic transponders (BioMedic Data Systems, Inc.—Seaford, DE, USA) were inserted under the dorsal skin fold immediately prior to the systemic administration of IgE. All injections were conducted on anesthetized mice (2% isoflurane, 98% oxygen mix for 2 to 3 min) in a closed chamber. Basal body temperature was determined prior to induction of anaphylaxis with anti-IgE and changes in temperature were measured using a DAS-8007 wireless reader system (BioMedic Data Systems, Inc., Seaford, DE, USA) at the indicated time intervals for a total period of 1 h.

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis comparing two grups was performed using a two-tailed unpaired t-test or two-way ANOVA if indicated (prism version 7.0; GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/5/1279/s1.

Author Contributions

Joseph M. Kulinski designed and performed the experiments, analyzed and interpreted the data and wrote the manuscript; Richard L. Proia advised on the study and provided experimental mice; Elisabeth M. Larson performed and analyzed experiments; Dean D. Metcalfe supervised the study and contributed to drafting of the manuscript. Ana Olivera supervised the study, designed and interpreted data and wrote the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Galina Tuymetova for providing the initial husbandry and expert technical assistance with S1pr4−/− founder animals. This work was supported by the Division of Intramural Research Programs within NIAID and NIDDK, NIH.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

GPCRG Protein-coupled receptor
S1PSphingosine-1-phosphate
S1P1-5Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors 1-5
S1PRSphingosine-1-phosphate receptor
FcεRIHigh affinity IgE receptor, Fc Epsilon receptor I
AgAntigen
SCFStem cell factor
BMMCBone marrow-derived mast cells
PDMCPeritoneum-derived mast cells
WTWild type
qPCRQuantitative real-time PCR
FAF BSAFatty acid-free bovine serum albumin
ddPCRDroplet digital PCR
PSAPassive systemic anaphylaxis
mAbMonoclonal antibody

References

  1. Strub, G.M.; Maceyka, M.; Hait, N.C.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Extracellular and intracellular actions of sphingosine-1-phosphate. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010, 688, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  2. Graler, M.H.; Bernhardt, G.; Lipp, M. EDG6, a novel G-protein-coupled receptor related to receptors for bioactive lysophospholipids, is specifically expressed in lymphoid tissue. Genomics 1998, 53, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Group, C.C.H.W. Meta-analysis of rare and common exome chip variants indentifies S1PR4 and other loci influencing blood cell traits. Nat. Genet. 2016, 8, 10. [Google Scholar]
  4. Allende, M.L.; Bektas, M.; Lee, B.G.; Bonifacino, E.; Kang, J.; Tuymetova, G.; Chen, W.; Saba, J.D.; Proia, R.L. Sphingosine-1-phosphate lyase deficiency produces a pro-inflammatory response while impairing neutrophil trafficking. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 7348–7358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gorlino, C.V.; Ranocchia, R.P.; Harman, M.F.; Garcia, I.A.; Crespo, M.I.; Moron, G.; Maletto, B.A.; Pistoresi-Palencia, M.C. Neutrophils exhibit differential requirements for homing molecules in their lymphatic and blood trafficking into draining lymph nodes. J. Immunol. 2014, 193, 1966–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Schulze, T.; Golfier, S.; Tabeling, C.; Rabel, K.; Graler, M.H.; Witzenrath, M.; Lipp, M. Sphingosine-1-phospate receptor 4 (S1P4) deficiency profoundly affects dendritic cell function and TH17-cell differentiation in a murine model. FASEB J. 2011, 25, 4024–4036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Wang, W.; Graeler, M.H.; Goetzl, E.J. Type 4 sphingosine 1-phosphate G protein-coupled receptor (S1P4) transduces S1P effects on T cell proliferation and cytokine secretion without signaling migration. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 1731–1733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Sic, H.; Kraus, H.; Madl, J.; Flittner, K.A.; von Munchow, A.L.; Pieper, K.; Rizzi, M.; Kienzler, A.K.; Ayata, K.; Rauer, S.; et al. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors control B-cell migration through signaling components associated with primary immunodeficiencies, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and multiple sclerosis. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2014, 134, 420–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kleinwort, A.; Luhrs, F.; Heidecke, C.D.; Lipp, M.; Schulze, T. S1P Signalling Differentially Affects Migration of Peritoneal B Cell Populations In Vitro and Influences the Production of Intestinal IgA In Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Gilfillan, A.M.; Peavy, R.D.; Metcalfe, D.D. Amplification mechanisms for the enhancement of antigen-mediated mast cell activation. Immunol. Res. 2009, 43, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Blank, U.; Rivera, J. The ins and outs of IgE-dependent mast-cell exocytosis. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Tsai, M.; Grimbaldeston, M.; Galli, S.J. Mast cells and immunoregulation/immunomodulation. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2011, 716, 186–211. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  13. Galli, S.J.; Tsai, M. Mast cells: Versatile regulators of inflammation, tissue remodeling, host defense and homeostasis. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2008, 49, 7–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gilfillan, A.M.; Beaven, M.A. Regulation of mast cell responses in health and disease. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 2011, 31, 475–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Olivera, A.; Allende, M.L.; Proia, R.L. Shaping the landscape: Metabolic regulation of S1P gradients. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1831, 193–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kulinski, J.M.; Munoz-Cano, R.; Olivera, A. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and other lipid mediators generated by mast cells as critical players in allergy and mast cell function. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2016, 778, 56–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Jolly, P.S.; Bektas, M.; Olivera, A.; Gonzalez-Espinosa, C.; Proia, R.L.; Rivera, J.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Transactivation of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptors by FcepsilonRI triggering is required for normal mast cell degranulation and chemotaxis. J. Exp. Med. 2004, 199, 959–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Mitra, P.; Oskeritzian, C.A.; Payne, S.G.; Beaven, M.A.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Role of ABCC1 in export of sphingosine-1-phosphate from mast cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 16394–16399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Olivera, A.; Urtz, N.; Mizugishi, K.; Yamashita, Y.; Gilfillan, A.M.; Furumoto, Y.; Gu, H.; Proia, R.L.; Baumruker, T.; Rivera, J. IgE-dependent activation of sphingosine kinases 1 and 2 and secretion of sphingosine 1-phosphate requires Fyn kinase and contributes to mast cell responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 2515–2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Olivera, A.; Beaven, M.A.; Metcalfe, D.D. Mast Cells Signal their Importance in Health and Disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Metcalfe, D.; Baram, D.; Mekori, Y.A. Mast cells. Physiol. Rev. 1997, 77, 1033–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jensen, B.M.; Swindle, E.J.; Iwaki, S.; Gilfillan, A.M. Generation, isolation, and maintenance of rodent mast cells and mast cell lines. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vukman KV, M.M.; Maurer, M.; O’Neill, SM. Isolation and Culture of Peritoneal Cell-derived Mast Cells. Bio Protoc. 2014, 4, e1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kashem, S.W.; Subramanian, H.; Collington, S.J.; Magotti, P.; Lambris, J.D.; Ali, H.G. protein coupled receptor specificity for C3a and compound 48/80-induced degranulation in human mast cells: Roles of Mas-related genes MrgX1 and MrgX2. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 668, 299–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Bandara, G.; Beaven, M.A.; Olivera, A.; Gilfillan, A.M.; Metcalfe, D.D. Activated mast cells synthesize and release soluble ST2-a decoy receptor for IL-33. Eur. J. Immunol. 2015, 45, 3034–3044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. McNeil, B.D.; Pundir, P.; Meeker, S.; Han, L.; Undem, B.J.; Kulka, M.; Dong, X. Identification of a mast-cell-specific receptor crucial for pseudo-allergic drug reactions. Nature 2015, 519, 237–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Mousli, M.; Hugli, T.E.; Landry, Y.; Bronner, C. Peptidergic pathway in human skin and rat peritoneal mast cell activation. Immunopharmacology 1994, 27, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liew, F.Y.; Girard, J.P.; Turnquist, H.R. Interleukin-33 in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2016, 16, 676–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Joulia, R.; L’Faqihi, F.E.; Valitutti, S.; Espinosa, E. IL-33 fine tunes mast cell degranulation and chemokine production at the single-cell level. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2017, 140, 497–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Hundley, T.R.; Gilfillan, A.M.; Tkaczyk, C.; Andrade, M.V.; Metcalfe, D.D.; Beaven, M.A. Kit and FcepsilonRI mediate unique and convergent signals for release of inflammatory mediators from human mast cells. Blood 2004, 104, 2410–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Gilfillan, A.M.; Tkaczyk, C. Integrated signalling pathways for mast-cell activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2006, 6, 218–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Taylor, S.C.; Laperriere, G.; Germain, H. Droplet Digital PCR versus qPCR for gene expression analysis with low abundant targets: From variable nonsense to publication quality data. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 2409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Rivera, J.; Proia, R.L.; Olivera, A. The alliance of sphingosine-1-phosphate and its receptors in immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2008, 8, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Finkelman, F.D. Anaphylaxis: Lessons from mouse models. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007, 120, 506–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Olivera, A.; Eisner, C.; Kitamura, Y.; Dillahunt, S.; Allende, L.; Tuymetova, G.; Watford, W.; Meylan, F.; Diesner, S.C.; Li, L.; et al. Sphingosine kinase 1 and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 are vital to recovery from anaphylactic shock in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 1429–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Borkowski, T.A.; Jouvin, M.H.; Lin, S.Y.; Kinet, J.P. Minimal requirements for IgE-mediated regulation of surface Fc epsilon RI. J. Immunol. 2001, 167, 1290–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Khodoun, M.V.; Kucuk, Z.Y.; Strait, R.T.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Janek, K.; Lewkowich, I.; Morris, S.C.; Finkelman, F.D. Rapid polyclonal desensitization with antibodies to IgE and FcepsilonRIalpha. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 131, 1555–1564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Galand, C.; Leyva-Castillo, J.M.; Yoon, J.; Han, A.; Lee, M.S.; McKenzie, A.N.J.; Stassen, M.; Oyoshi, M.K.; Finkelman, F.D.; Geha, R.S. IL-33 promotes food anaphylaxis in epicutaneously sensitized mice by targeting mast cells. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 138, 1356–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kamijo, S.; Suzuki, M.; Hara, M.; Shimura, S.; Ochi, H.; Maruyama, N.; Matsuda, A.; Saito, H.; Nakae, S.; Suto, H.; et al. Subcutaneous Allergic Sensitization to Protease Allergen Is Dependent on Mast Cells but Not IL-33: Distinct Mechanisms between Subcutaneous and Intranasal Routes. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 3559–3569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Galli, S.J.; Tsai, M. IgE and mast cells in allergic disease. Nat. Med. 2012, 18, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Oskeritzian, C.A.; Alvarez, S.E.; Hait, N.C.; Price, M.M.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Distinct roles of sphingosine kinases 1 and 2 in human mast-cell functions. Blood 2008, 111, 4193–4200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Cyster, J.G.; Schwab, S.R. Sphingosine-1-phosphate and lymphocyte egress from lymphoid organs. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 30, 69–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, F.; van Brocklyn, J.R.; Hobson, J.P.; Movafagh, S.; Zukowska-Grojec, Z.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Sphingosine 1-phosphate stimulates cell migration through a Gi-coupled cell surface receptor. Potential involvement in angiogenesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 35343–35350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Lee, M.J.; Thangada, S.; Paik, J.H.; Sapkota, G.P.; Ancellin, N.; Chae, S.S.; Wu, M.; Morales-Ruiz, M.; Sessa, W.C.; Alessi, D.R.; et al. Akt-mediated phosphorylation of the G protein-coupled receptor EDG-1 is required for endothelial cell chemotaxis. Mol. Cell. 2001, 8, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Van Brocklyn, J.R.; Graler, M.H.; Bernhardt, G.; Hobson, J.P.; Lipp, M.; Spiegel, S. Sphingosine-1-phosphate is a ligand for the G protein-coupled receptor EDG-6. Blood 2000, 95, 2624–2629. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  46. Graler, M.H.; Grosse, R.; Kusch, A.; Kremmer, E.; Gudermann, T.; Lipp, M. The sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor S1P4 regulates cell shape and motility via coupling to Gi and G12/13. J. Cell. Biochem. 2003, 89, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Dillmann, C.; Ringel, C.; Ringleb, J.; Mora, J.; Olesch, C.; Fink, A.F.; Roberts, E.; Brune, B.; Weigert, A. S1PR4 Signaling Attenuates ILT 7 Internalization To Limit IFN-α Production by Human Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells. J. Immunol. 2016, 196, 1579–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Cencetti, F.; Bernacchioni, C.; Tonelli, F.; Roberts, E.; Donati, C.; Bruni, P. TGFβ1 evokes myoblast apoptotic response via a novel signaling pathway involving S1P4 transactivation upstream of Rho-kinase-2 activation. FASEB J. 2013, 27, 4532–4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Matsuyuki, H.; Maeda, Y.; Yano, K.; Sugahara, K.; Chiba, K.; Kohno, T.; Igarashi, Y. Involvement of sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) receptor type 1 and type 4 in migratory response of mouse T cells toward S1P. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2006, 3, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Olesch, C.; Ringel, C.; Brune, B.; Weigert, A. Beyond Immune Cell Migration: The Emerging Role of the Sphingosine-1-phosphate Receptor S1PR4 as a Modulator of Innate Immune Cell Activation. Mediators Inflamm. 2017, 2017, 6059203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Olivera, A.; Dillahunt, S.E.; Rivera, J. Interrogation of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 function in vivo reveals a prominent role in the recovery from IgE and IgG-mediated anaphylaxis with minimal effect on its onset. Immunol. Lett. 2013, 150, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Oskeritzian, C.A.; Price, M.M.; Hait, N.C.; Kapitonov, D.; Falanga, Y.T.; Morales, J.K.; Ryan, J.J.; Milstien, S.; Spiegel, S. Essential roles of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 in human mast cell activation, anaphylaxis, and pulmonary edema. J. Exp. Med. 2010, 207, 465–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Gurish, M.F.; Austen, K.F. Developmental origin and functional specialization of mast cell subsets. Immunity 2012, 37, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Kuehn, H.S.; Radinger, M.; Brown, J.M.; Ali, K.; Vanhaesebroeck, B.; Beaven, M.A.; Metcalfe, D.D.; Gilfillan, A.M. Btk-dependent Rac activation and actin rearrangement following FcepsilonRI aggregation promotes enhanced chemotactic responses of mast cells. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123, 2576–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Lennartsson, J.; Jelacic, T.; Linnekin, D.; Shivakrupa, R. Normal and oncogenic forms of the receptor tyrosine kinase kit. Stem Cells 2005, 23, 16–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Linnekin, D. Early signaling pathways activated by c-Kit in hematopoietic cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1999, 31, 1053–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Moon, T.C.; St Laurent, C.D.; Morris, K.E.; Marcet, C.; Yoshimura, T.; Sekar, Y.; Befus, A.D. Advances in mast cell biology: New understanding of heterogeneity and function. Mucosal. Immunol. 2010, 3, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Crivellato, E.; Ribatti, D. The mast cell: An evolutionary perspective. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 2010, 85, 347–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Lefrancais, E.; Duval, A.; Mirey, E.; Roga, S.; Espinosa, E.; Cayrol, C.; Girard, J.P. Central domain of IL-33 is cleaved by mast cell proteases for potent activation of group-2 innate lymphoid cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15502–15507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Cui, H.; Okamoto, Y.; Yoshioka, K.; Du, W.; Takuwa, N.; Zhang, W.; Asano, M.; Shibamoto, T.; Takuwa, Y. Sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 2 protects against anaphylactic shock through suppression of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in mice. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2013, 132, 1205–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Sekar, D.; Hahn, C.; Brune, B.; Roberts, E.; Weigert, A. Apoptotic tumor cells induce IL-27 release from human DCs to activate Treg cells that express CD69 and attenuate cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 2012, 42, 1585–1598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Kuehn, H.S.; Radinger, M.; Gilfillan, A.M. Measuring mast cell mediator release. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Olivera, A.; Mizugishi, K.; Tikhonova, A.; Ciaccia, L.; Odom, S.; Proia, R.L.; Rivera, J. The sphingosine kinase-sphingosine-1-phosphate axis is a determinant of mast cell function and anaphylaxis. Immunity 2007, 26, 287–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Charles, N.; Watford, W.T.; Ramos, H.L.; Hellman, L.; Oettgen, H.C.; Gomez, G.; Ryan, J.J.; O’Shea, J.J.; Rivera, J. Lyn kinase controls basophil GATA-3 transcription factor expression and induction of Th2 cell differentiation. Immunity 2009, 30, 533–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Ozawa, K.; Szallasi, Z.; Kazanietz, M.G.; Blumberg, P.M.; Mischak, H.; Mushinski, J.F.; Beaven, M.A. Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-independent isozymes of protein kinase C mediate exocytosis in antigen-stimulated rat basophilic RBL-2H3 cells. Reconstitution of secretory responses with Ca2+ and purified isozymes in washed permeabilized cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1993, 268, 1749–1756. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Liu, F.T.; Bohn, J.W.; Ferry, E.L.; Yamamoto, H.; Molinaro, C.A.; Sherman, L.A.; Klinman, N.R.; Katz, D.H. Monoclonal dinitrophenyl-specific murine IgE antibody: Preparation, isolation, and characterization. J. Immunol. 1980, 124, 2728–2737. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  67. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCt Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 01279 g001 550
Figure 1. S1P4 is expressed in mast cells. Quantitative PCR data showing the relative expression of S1P receptor message normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMC, left) and peritoneal-derived mast cells (PDMC, right). Plots represent the mean ± SE (or SD for PDMC) of data pooled from 7 independent BMMC or 2 PDMC cultures. ND: Not detected.
Figure 1. S1P4 is expressed in mast cells. Quantitative PCR data showing the relative expression of S1P receptor message normalized to glyceraldehyde 3-dehydrogenase (GAPDH) in bone marrow-derived mast cells (BMMC, left) and peritoneal-derived mast cells (PDMC, right). Plots represent the mean ± SE (or SD for PDMC) of data pooled from 7 independent BMMC or 2 PDMC cultures. ND: Not detected.
Ijms 19 01279 g001
Ijms 19 01279 g002a 550Ijms 19 01279 g002b 550
Figure 2. Analysis of degranulation, cytokine and chemokine responses in primary S1P4-deficient mast cells. (A–C) Degranulation response to antigen stimulation (A,B) or to pharmacological stimulation with thapsigargin (B). Mast cells from S1pr4+/+ (solid) and S1pr4−/− mice (open) were grown in the presence of stem cell factor (SCF) and recombinant mIL-3 for 6–7 weeks (BMMC) or 14 days (PDMC) and sensitized with 100 ng/mL anti-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-IgE in cytokine-free media for 14 h. Degranulation was assessed by measuring the release of β-hexosaminidase into the media after 30 min of stimulation with the indicated concentrations of DNP (antigen; Ag) (A), 1 µM thapsigargin (B), or antigen in addition to 1 ng/mL recombinant IL-33 (C). Data represent the mean ± SE of results pooled from 4–8 independent cultures. (D,E) BMMC from S1pr4+/+ (solid bars) and S1pr4−/− mice (open bars) were sensitized overnight with 100 ng/mL anti-DNP IgE in cytokine-free media. Cells were washed, stimulated with the indicated concentrations of Ag and the amounts of IL-6 (D) and TNF-α (E) secreted into the media measured by ELISA at 4 h post-stimulation. The limit of detection for IL-6 and TNF-α quantitation by ELISA are shown by a dotted line in panels C and D at 0.0018 ng/mL and 0.00721 ng/mL, respectively. Data is pooled from 4 independent cultures. (F,G) Validation by ddPCR of the normalized relative expression of select chemokines (F) and cytokines (G) identified as being variably upregulated in S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− BMMC cultures following Ag stimulation. Relative expression of Il6 is included for comparison. Data show mean ± SE of values obtained from at least seven independent cultures of BMMC for each genotype. All comparisons between S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− cells were found to be not statistically significant unless otherwise indicated. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Analysis of degranulation, cytokine and chemokine responses in primary S1P4-deficient mast cells. (A–C) Degranulation response to antigen stimulation (A,B) or to pharmacological stimulation with thapsigargin (B). Mast cells from S1pr4+/+ (solid) and S1pr4−/− mice (open) were grown in the presence of stem cell factor (SCF) and recombinant mIL-3 for 6–7 weeks (BMMC) or 14 days (PDMC) and sensitized with 100 ng/mL anti-dinitrophenyl (DNP)-IgE in cytokine-free media for 14 h. Degranulation was assessed by measuring the release of β-hexosaminidase into the media after 30 min of stimulation with the indicated concentrations of DNP (antigen; Ag) (A), 1 µM thapsigargin (B), or antigen in addition to 1 ng/mL recombinant IL-33 (C). Data represent the mean ± SE of results pooled from 4–8 independent cultures. (D,E) BMMC from S1pr4+/+ (solid bars) and S1pr4−/− mice (open bars) were sensitized overnight with 100 ng/mL anti-DNP IgE in cytokine-free media. Cells were washed, stimulated with the indicated concentrations of Ag and the amounts of IL-6 (D) and TNF-α (E) secreted into the media measured by ELISA at 4 h post-stimulation. The limit of detection for IL-6 and TNF-α quantitation by ELISA are shown by a dotted line in panels C and D at 0.0018 ng/mL and 0.00721 ng/mL, respectively. Data is pooled from 4 independent cultures. (F,G) Validation by ddPCR of the normalized relative expression of select chemokines (F) and cytokines (G) identified as being variably upregulated in S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− BMMC cultures following Ag stimulation. Relative expression of Il6 is included for comparison. Data show mean ± SE of values obtained from at least seven independent cultures of BMMC for each genotype. All comparisons between S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− cells were found to be not statistically significant unless otherwise indicated. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 19 01279 g002aIjms 19 01279 g002b
Ijms 19 01279 g003 550
Figure 3. BMMC chemotaxis in the absence of S1pr4 expression. (A) BMMC from S1pr4+/+ (solid bars) and S1pr4−/− mice (open bars) grown in the presence of SCF and IL-3 for 6 weeks were sensitized with anti-DNP IgE in serum-free, cytokine-free media supplemented with 0.04% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 14 h. Sensitized cells were subject to transwell migration analysis using antigen (DNP; Ag) with or without 100 nM S1P as a chemoattractant at the indicated concentrations in the bottom chamber. (B) Chemotaxis of BMMC towards 10 ng/mL SCF in the bottom chamber. After 4 h incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2, cells that migrated into the lower chamber were collected and counted. In each experiment, three to six technical replicates were performed for the S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− cultures. Percent specific migration was calculated by taking the average number of cells in the bottom chamber/total input cells × 100. Data represents the mean ± SE normalized migration for three independent BMMC cultures for each genotype. In each experiment, migration of S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− cultures were normalized to the average migration to Ag (10 ng/mL) across the 3 S1pr4+/+ cultures. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. BMMC chemotaxis in the absence of S1pr4 expression. (A) BMMC from S1pr4+/+ (solid bars) and S1pr4−/− mice (open bars) grown in the presence of SCF and IL-3 for 6 weeks were sensitized with anti-DNP IgE in serum-free, cytokine-free media supplemented with 0.04% fatty acid-free bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 14 h. Sensitized cells were subject to transwell migration analysis using antigen (DNP; Ag) with or without 100 nM S1P as a chemoattractant at the indicated concentrations in the bottom chamber. (B) Chemotaxis of BMMC towards 10 ng/mL SCF in the bottom chamber. After 4 h incubation at 37 °C in 5% CO2, cells that migrated into the lower chamber were collected and counted. In each experiment, three to six technical replicates were performed for the S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− cultures. Percent specific migration was calculated by taking the average number of cells in the bottom chamber/total input cells × 100. Data represents the mean ± SE normalized migration for three independent BMMC cultures for each genotype. In each experiment, migration of S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− cultures were normalized to the average migration to Ag (10 ng/mL) across the 3 S1pr4+/+ cultures. * p < 0.05.
Ijms 19 01279 g003
Ijms 19 01279 g004 550
Figure 4. S1pr4 deletion exacerbates PSA. (A) S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− mice were injected i.v. with 3 µg of mouse IgE. 24 h later, systemic anaphylaxis was induced by i.v. injection of 9 µg of anti-mouse IgE. Body temperature was monitored at the indicated times (S1pr4+/+ n = 4, S1pr4−/− n = 7). The asterisks between the curves indicate significant differences (p < 0.001) between genotypes using a two way-ANOVA test. (B,C) Dorsal skin biopsies (B) and inguinal lymph nodes (LN) (C) harvested from S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− mice were fixed in 10% neutral buffer formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Three sections per skin biopsy and two sections per lymph node were stained with toluidine blue and eosin. Each dot represents the average number of metachromatic staining cells/10× field (B) or inguinal LN section (C) in one mouse and was calculated from five fields for each section examined, averaging values from 3 (B) or 2 (C) different sections for each tissue/animal. Floating bars represent the mean ± SE for each group of mice.
Figure 4. S1pr4 deletion exacerbates PSA. (A) S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− mice were injected i.v. with 3 µg of mouse IgE. 24 h later, systemic anaphylaxis was induced by i.v. injection of 9 µg of anti-mouse IgE. Body temperature was monitored at the indicated times (S1pr4+/+ n = 4, S1pr4−/− n = 7). The asterisks between the curves indicate significant differences (p < 0.001) between genotypes using a two way-ANOVA test. (B,C) Dorsal skin biopsies (B) and inguinal lymph nodes (LN) (C) harvested from S1pr4+/+ and S1pr4−/− mice were fixed in 10% neutral buffer formalin, embedded in paraffin and sectioned. Three sections per skin biopsy and two sections per lymph node were stained with toluidine blue and eosin. Each dot represents the average number of metachromatic staining cells/10× field (B) or inguinal LN section (C) in one mouse and was calculated from five fields for each section examined, averaging values from 3 (B) or 2 (C) different sections for each tissue/animal. Floating bars represent the mean ± SE for each group of mice.
Ijms 19 01279 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kulinski, J.M.; Proia, R.L.; Larson, E.M.; Metcalfe, D.D.; Olivera, A. S1P4 Regulates Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis in Mice but Is Dispensable for Canonical IgE-Mediated Responses in Mast Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051279

AMA Style

Kulinski JM, Proia RL, Larson EM, Metcalfe DD, Olivera A. S1P4 Regulates Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis in Mice but Is Dispensable for Canonical IgE-Mediated Responses in Mast Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(5):1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kulinski, Joseph M., Richard L. Proia, Elisabeth M. Larson, Dean D. Metcalfe, and Ana Olivera. 2018. "S1P4 Regulates Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis in Mice but Is Dispensable for Canonical IgE-Mediated Responses in Mast Cells" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 5: 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051279

APA Style

Kulinski, J. M., Proia, R. L., Larson, E. M., Metcalfe, D. D., & Olivera, A. (2018). S1P4 Regulates Passive Systemic Anaphylaxis in Mice but Is Dispensable for Canonical IgE-Mediated Responses in Mast Cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 19(5), 1279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop