Next Article in Journal
Enhanced Homing Technique of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using Iron Oxide Nanoparticles by Magnetic Attraction in Olfactory-Injured Mouse Models
Next Article in Special Issue
Signaling Crosstalk of TGF-β/ALK5 and PAR2/PAR1: A Complex Regulatory Network Controlling Fibrosis and Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Plant–Microbe Interaction 2017—The Good, the Bad and the Diverse
Previous Article in Special Issue
Resistance to Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Cancer—Alterations to Anti-VEGF Pathway
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/ijms19051375
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Glioma-Associated Oncogene Homolog Inhibitors Have the Potential of Suppressing Cancer Stem Cells of Breast Cancer

by
Kuo-Shyang Jeng
1,
Chi-Juei Jeng
2,
I-Shyan Sheen
3,
Szu-Hua Wu
4,
Ssu-Jung Lu
1,
Chih-Hsuan Wang
1 and
Chiung-Fang Chang
1,*
1
General Surgery Division and Department of Medical Research, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan
2
Postgraduate Institute of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan
3
Department of Internal Medicine, Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan City 333, Taiwan
4
Food Safety, Hygiene and Management University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(5), 1375; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051375
Submission received: 30 March 2018 / Revised: 25 April 2018 / Accepted: 2 May 2018 / Published: 5 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Alterations to Signalling Pathways in Cancer Cells 2018)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Overexpression of Sonic Hedgehog signaling (Shh) pathway molecules is associated with invasiveness and recurrence in breast carcinoma. Therefore, inhibition of the Shh pathway downstream molecule Glioma-associated Oncogene Homolog (Gli) was investigated for its ability to reduce progression and invasiveness of patient-derived breast cancer cells and cell lines. Human primary breast cancer T2 cells with high expression of Shh signaling pathway molecules were compared with breast cancer line MDA-MB-231 cells. The therapeutic effects of Gli inhibitors were examined in terms of the cell proliferation, apoptosis, cancer stem cells, cell migration and gene expression. Blockade of the Shh signaling pathway could reduce cell proliferation and migration only in MDA-MB-231 cells. Hh pathway inhibitor-1 (HPI-1) increased the percentages of late apoptotic cells in MDA-MB-231 cells and early apoptotic cells in T2 cells. It reduced Bcl2 expression for cell proliferation and increased Bim expression for apoptosis. In addition, Gli inhibitor HPI-1 decreased significantly the percentages of cancer stem cells in T2 cells. HPI-1 worked more effectively than GANT-58 against breast carcinoma cells. In conclusion, HPI-1 could inhibit cell proliferation, reduce cell invasion and decrease cancer stem cell population in breast cancer cells. To target Gli-1 could be a potential strategy to suppress breast cancer stem cells.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Breast carcinoma is the most common cancer among women worldwide [1,2]. The current main treatments include surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, hormone therapy and target therapy [3,4]. However, metastases at distant sites and recurrence are the main causes of death in breast cancer. Breast cancer stem cells (CSC) CD44+CD24low exhibit enhanced invasive properties for the metastasis and escape from the therapies [5,6]. Targeting CSC could be a strategy to prevent metastasis and recurrence.
The Sonic Hedgehog signaling (Shh) pathway plays an essential role in maintaining cancer stem cells and side populations [7,8]. This pathway is also involved in breast carcinogenesis, invasion and metastasis [9,10,11,12]. Our previous study suggested overexpression of Hh signaling pathway molecules Shh, Ptch-1, Smo and glioma-associated oncogene homolog (Gli) is associated with invasiveness and could be potential biomarkers for breast cancer recurrence [13]. Serum Shh and interleukin-6 (IL-6) could be useful prognostic biomarkers in progressive breast cancer [14]. Shh promotes glycolysis and proliferation of breast cancer [15]. The hypomethylation in Shh promoter leads to its overexpression in breast cancer patients [16]. Shh overexpression was associated with nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) activation, as a poor prognosis indicator for breast cancer [17]. In addition, the Shh pathway mediates progression from a non-invasive phenotype to an invasive phenotype based on the ratio Gli-1 nuclear translocation [18]. Elevated Gli-1 and Gli-2 protein level in human breast cancer was associated with poor prognosis and progressive stages of disease [19,20]. Gli-1 is crucial for hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and invasion of breast cancer [21]. Activated Hh could increase Gli expression and enhance SRY-box 2 (Sox2) and Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4) expression to regulate cancer stem cell maintenance [22]. Moreover, chemotherapy could activate Hh-Gli signaling and chemotherapy such as doxorubicin, cisplatin resistance as was mediated by Gli [23,24]. The crosstalking and activation of Shh pathway and Wnt signaling pathway is associated with poor outcomes in breast cancer (BC) patients as well as cancer stem cells [25,26]. Cancer stem cells contribute to chemotherapy resistance [27,28]. Therefore, Shh signaling pathway molecules could be potential therapeutic targets in breast cancer [29,30].
Two Gli antagonists GANT58 and HPI-1 were used to inhibit Shh signaling pathway in this study. GANT58 interfered with GLI1 and GLI2-mediated transcription in a dose-dependent manner and reduced growth of prostate cancer [31]. GANT58 induced apoptosis in T leukemia cells by altering Hedgehog signaling pathway [32]. In addition, small molecule Hh inhibitors (HPI-1, 2, 3 and 4) were identified to perturb Gli processing, stability, localization and function [33]. Nanoparticles with HPI-1 inhibit the growth or metastasis in orthotopic model of human pancreatic cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma [34,35].
The therapeutic effects of Gli inhibition remain unclear in primary breast cancer cells. In this study, primary human BC cells with highly expression of Hh signaling molecules were isolated in comparison with BC cell line MDA-MB-231 cells. Besides, two kinds of small-molecule Gli antagonists GANT-58 and HPI-1 were used to compare their therapeutic effects in terms of cell viability, apoptosis, cell migration and cancer stem cells.

2. Results

2.1. Cell Morphology and Her2 Expression of Breast Carcinoma Cells

The morphology of MDA-MB-231 cells and T2 are similar as epithelial cell subtype and adherent cells (Figure 1a). However, T2 cells can form a bigger spheroid than MDA-MB-231 cells does in 3-dimensional culture (Figure 1b). Breast carcinoma T2 cells were isolated from a patient with estrogen receptor (ER) (−), progesterone receptor (PR) (−) and Her2 (+). Therefore, T2 cells were compared with established breast carcinoma cell line MDA-MB-231 cells with ER (−), PR (−) and human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER) (0−1+). The expression of Her2 was higher in T2 cells than in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 1c).

2.2. High Expression of Shh Pathway Molecules in Primary Breast Carcinoma

Shh signaling pathways play an important role in the progression of breast carcinoma. Shh pathway molecules Shh, Ptch-1, Smo and Gli-1 were expressed in MDA-MB-231 and T2 cells. T2 cells express higher Shh pathway molecules than MDA-MB-231 cell line (Figure 2). There were no significant differences between in Shh and Ptch expression in these two cells (Shh, p = 0.059; Ptch-1, p = 0.112) (Figure 2a,b). However, T2 cells significantly expressed higher mRNA level of Smo and Gli-1 than MDA-MB-231 cells (Smo, p = 0.001; Gli, p = 0.0005) (Figure 2c,d). It suggested T2 cells could have a stronger Hh signaling pathway via transcription factor GLI-1 than MDA-MB-231 cell line.

2.3. Reduced Cell Viability by Gli Inhibitors

The cell viability of human breast cancer cells MDA-MB-231 and T2 was evaluated by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay after exposing the cells to Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (control), GANT58 or HPI-1 for 72 h. GLI inhibitor GANT-58 could start to reduce the cell proliferation of MDA-MB-231 cells at the highest dose of 100 μM (Figure 3a, upper panel). However, there were no significant differences in the cell viability of T2 cells in absence or presence of GANT-58 (Figure 3a, bottom panel), even at the dose of 100 μM. In addition, another Gli inhibitor HPI-1 decreased cell viability in dose dependent way in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 3b, upper panel). However, there were no significant differences in the cell viability of T2 cells in absence or presence of HPI-1 (Figure 3b, bottom panel). Overall, our results demonstrated that HPI-1 is more effective than GANT-58 in reducing the cell viability of breast cancer cells. Both Gli inhibitors at dose of 100 μM cannot reduce the cell viability in T2 cells.

2.4. Gli Inhibitors Increased the Percentages of Late Apoptotic Breast Carcinoma Cells

Increasing the apoptotic cells could lead to the reduction of cell proliferation. Therefore, the effects of Gli-1 inhibitors for the apoptosis were assessed. In MDA-MB-231 cells, HPI-1 increased the percentages of late apoptotic cells (Annexin V+PI+) (Figure 4a upper panel and 4b). In T2 cells, HPI-1 increased the percentages of early apoptotic cells (Annexin V+PI−) (Figure 4a bottom panel and Figure 4b). GANT58 did not alter the percentages of the apoptotic cells (Figure 4a,b). It suggested HPI-1 worked more effective than GANT-58 to induce the apoptosis of breast carcinoma cells.

2.5. Decreased the Percentages of Cancer Stem Cells CD44+CD24low in Primary Breast Carcinoma Cells

Shh pathway is involved in stem cell regeneration and maintenance. CD44+CD24low population is considered as stem cells of breast carcinoma. Both MDA-MB-231 cells and T2 cells have a major population of cancer stem cells CD44+CD24low. There is no significant change in the expression of CD44 and CD24 in MDA-MB-231 cells with Gli inhibition (Figure 5a, upper panel). In T2 cells, HPI-1 could significantly decrease in the percentage of CD44+CD24low cells whereas GANT-58 did not alter the percentage of cancer stem cells (Figure 5a, bottom panel and Figure 5b). Therefore, it suggested HPI-1 could alter the expression of stem cell marker CD24 in T2 cells.

2.6. Gli Inhibitor Reduced Migration in Breast Carcinoma Cell Line MDA-MB-231 Cells

Hedgehog signaling pathway molecule Gli-1 is important for migration and invasion of breast cancer. The migrated MDA-MB-231 cells were decreased by GANT-58 or HPI-1 treatment (Figure 6a, upper raw). There was a significant difference between control and HPI-1 or GANT-58 treatment in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 6b, left panel). In T2 cells, GANT-58 and HPI-1 could reduce the migration (Figure 6a, bottom raw). However, the differences between control and GANT-58 or HPI-1 treatment were not significant (Figure 6b, right panel). Overall, Gli inhibition could reduce migration in the breast cancer cell line, but not in T2 cells.

2.7. Gli inhibition Decreased Bcl2 and MMP2 Expression and Increased Bim Expression

Gli inhibitor HPI-1 could reduce the gene expression in Gli-1 (Figure 7a). However, there was no significant difference in Gli-1 expression in presence or absence of GANT-58 treatment. HPI-1 could reduce cell proliferation and induce cell apoptosis. Therefore, the survival gene Bcl2 and apoptotic gene Bim were analyzed with or without the Gli inhibition. HPI-1 could reduce Bcl2 expression only in MDA-MB-231 cells (Figure 7b). HPI-1 could increase Bim expression in both MDA-MB-231 cells and T2 cells (Figure 7c). Matrix Metallopeptidase 2 (MMP2) activity is responsible for cancer cell migration. In T2 cells, GANT-58 and HPI-1 treatment could reduce the expression of MMP2 (Figure 7d). Therefore, Gli inhibition could reduce cell migration of breast cancer cells.

3. Discussion

The primary breast cancer T2 cells were successfully isolated and cultured. Breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 was used to compare with T2 cells because they shared some similarity such as ER (−), PR (−) and the morphology in a two-dimensional culture system. They also form a major population of cancer stem cells CD44+CD24low. However, there were some different characters and gene expression in T2 cells and MDA-MB-231 cells. MDA-MB-231 cells grow better without CO2, but T2 cells could grow under 5% CO2. In 3 dimensional cultures, spheroid formation is as an indicator for drug screening and cancer stem cells [36]. MDA-MB-231 cells could form looser spheroids compared to other breast cancer cell lines [37]. T2 cells could forms multiple spheroids better than MDA-MB-231 cells. It suggested T2 cells tend to aggregate and form clusters.
T2 cells have higher expression of Shh signaling pathway molecules than MDA-MB-231 cells. MDA-MB-231 cells express relative low Gli but express moderate Shh molecules among different cell lines [17,38]. Therefore, it suggested that Hh molecules were overexpressed in T2 cells, especially the downstream molecule Gli-1. Our previous data suggested that overexpression of Shh signaling pathway molecules were correlated with invasiveness and recurrence in breast carcinoma [13]. Gli expression was correlated with Her2 expression whereas Shh expression was correlated with tumor grade [39]. In this study, T2 cells express slightly higher Her2 than MDA-MB-231 cells. However, the migration activity of T2 cells seems lower than MDA-MB-231 cells, which could be due to the phenotype of T2 cells.
The advantages of Gli inhibition is to bypass the Smo mutations and directly inhibit the Hh signaling downstream transcription factor [40]. Moreover, osteopontin (OPN) regulates Gli-1 activity, expression and induces epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity in breast carcinoma [23]. Therefore, inhibition of Gli could be a better strategy. Two Gli antagonists GANT58 and HPI-1 were used in this study. GANT58 demonstrates a high degree of selectivity for Hh/Gli signaling [31]. HPI-1 could reduce tumor growth of CD133-expressing hepatocellular carcinoma [35]. However, it has not been compared the therapeutic efficacy of GANT58 and HPI-1 in breast carcinoma with higher or lower expression of Hh molecules.
Our study demonstrated Gli inhibition could induce apoptosis and reduce survival in both breast carcinoma cells although the Gli expression was different in these two cell lines. Gli inhibitor HPI-1 could significantly reduce the expression of survival protein Bcl2 and increase apoptotic protein Bim in MDA-MB-231 cells. The proapoptotic protein Bim binding to the antiapoptotic Bcl2 results in the release of Bax/Bak to promote apoptosis. Therefore, it is correlated with the increased apoptotic cells in MDA-MB-231 cells. In T2 cells, increased Bim expression could be associated with increased apoptotic cells. Our study supported HPI-1 treatment could alter the gene expression of Bcl2 and Bim to induce apoptosis in breast cancer cells. It is also true that Gli inhibitor GANT-61 treatment could also decreased Bcl2 and increased proapoptic factor Bax in other breast cancer cell lines MCF and MDA-MB-453 [39]. Moreover, it agreed with previous study that inhibition of Hh pathway by itraconazole could induce apoptosis, reduce Bcl2 protein expression and autophagic cell death in breast cancer cells [41]. However, the cell viability of T2 cells was less sensitive to Gli-1 inhibition whereas HPI-1 reduced the cell viability of MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose-dependent manner. It may require higher doses of Gli antagonists because of Gli-1 overexpression in T2 cells. It is possible that the concentration of Gli inhibitor could be too high to be specific. Previous study demonstrated that the IC50 of HPI-1 was about 1~6 μM in HEK293T cells but it was over 30 μM in Wnt-LIGHT cells (Wnt3a) HEK293T cells [33]. In addition, human hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell line Huh7 cells was treated with 40 μM NanoHHI (HPI-1 in nanoparticle) to inhibit cell growth and reduce 40% cell viability [35]. It suggested that the IC50 of HPI-1 for some cells could be over 30 μM. Therefore, the similar concentration ranges of HPI-1(0~100 μM) was used in this study.
Breast CSC cells (CD44+CD24low) express stem cell associated genes such as Oct4, Aldh1, Notch, and so on. [42]. CSC cells are highly resistant to chemotherapeutic reagents. Both MDA-MB-231 cells and T2 cells express a major population of cancer stem cells CD44+CD24low. GANT-58 did not alter cancer stem cell population in both cells but HPI-1 could reduce the percentage of cancer stem cells in T2 cells. HPI-1 work more effectively than GANT-58 in the same dosage. Gli inhibition could reduce significantly in the cell migration of MDA-MB-231 cells, but not in T2 cells with lower ability for the cell migration. MMP2 secretion and activation is associated the metastasis of breast carcinoma [43]. Although there were no significant differences in MMP2 in MDA-MB-231 cells, it was significantly down-regulated in T2 cells. It could be due to different expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in these two types of breast cancer cells.
Among the other antagonists of the Shh signaling pathway, the smo inhibitor cyclopamine could reduce cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, alter cell cycle and decrease invasive ability in breast cancer cells [44,45,46]. It could reduce cell proliferation of breast cancer stem cells [47]. Other Hh antagonists include cyclopamine, GDC-0449, and so on [29,48,49]. Smo antagonist GDC-0449 is a for basal cell carcinoma (BCC) [50,51]. Recent study suggested that Gli antagonist GANT61 work more effectively than Smo antagonist GDC-0449 (Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval drug) to reduce cell growth, alter cell cycle in vitro and in vivo [39]. GANT61 could significantly reduce cell proliferation, cell motility and invasion, decrease CSC proportion and mammospheres [12,52,53]. In addition, antibodies blockade of Hh signaling in peri-tumoral stromal cells could be a therapeutic approach in basal-like breast cancers [54,55].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Cell Culture

MDA-MB-231 cells were purchased from Bioresource Collection and Research Center, Taiwan. Cells were cultured in L15 (Hyclone, South Logan, UT, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 unit/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 0.1 mM NEAA (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a humidified atmosphere without CO2 at 37 °C. For primary cell culture from the patient’ sample, all the procedures were approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (the approval number: 099117-F, 16 May, 2011). A signed consent from was obtained from the patient who underwent primary surgical resection and enrolled in this study. Breast carcinoma T2 cells were isolated from a patient with ER (−), PR (−) and Her2 (+). Primary cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 20% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 unit/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin and 0.1 mM Non-essential Amino Acid (NEAA) (Gibco) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

4.2. RNA Isolation and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from breast carcinoma cells by with the RNAspin Mini RNA isolation kit (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, UK) according to the manufacture’s protocol. The total RNA was reversely transcripted to cDNA by a high capacity cDNA reverse transcription (RT) kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The mRNA expression was analyzed by a real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) machine Roche LightCycler480 (Roche Applied Science, Mannheim, Germany). The PCR mixture were prepared with cDNA template, forward and reverse primers and SYBR Green Master Mix. For real-time PCR, procedures were as follows: hot start at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 45 cycles of denaturing at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 58 °C for 5 s and extension at 72 °C for 20 s. PCR products were detected using 2% agarose gel to confirm the expected sizes. The following specific primer pairs for Shh, Ptch-1, Gli-1, Smo, Bcl2, Bim, MMP2 and GAPDH are summarized in the Table 1. Gene expression was analyzed after normalization to control gene GAPDH. The relative gene expression was calculated by 2 − ∆∆Ct method. ∆∆Ct = ∆Ct (target gene) − ∆Ct (control, GAPDH), relative gene expression = 2 − ∆∆Ct.

4.3. Cell Viability Assay

The cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Cells were seeded into 96-well plate (1 × 104 cells/well) and treated with GANT-58 (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA) or HPI-1 (Tocris Bioscience, Abingdon, UK) for 48 h MTT (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to each well and incubated for last 4 h. The medium with MTT was aspirated, followed by the addition of DMSO (Sigma). The absorbance 570 nm was measured by an ELISA reader (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.4. Flow Cytometry

For apoptosis assay, cells were stained with Fluorescein isothiocyante (FITC) Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen, San Jose, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For cancer stem cells, cells were stained with anti-CD44 antibody labeled with FITC and anti-CD24 antibody labeled with Allophycocyanin (APC) (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The data were collected on a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).

4.5. Cell Migration Assay

8-μm-pore Transwell inserts were used for the cell migration assay (Corning Inc., Tewksbury, CA, USA). Breast carcinoma cells was seeded at the density of 1 × 105 cells/well in the transwell containing L15 medium with 1% FBS (for MDA-MB-231 cells) or DMEM medium with 2% FBS (for T2 cells) and the transwell was placed in 24-well containing L15 medium with 10% FBS or DMEM medium with 20% FBS. Cells were treated with 40 μM Gli inhibitor GANT58 or HPI-1 for 24 h. The migrated breast carcinoma cells were evaluated 24-h post-incubation at 37 °C. The migrated cells were fixed with 10% formaldehyde and washed with PBS. The migrated cells were then stained with crystal violet (Sigma Aldrich) for 2 h and washed with sterile ddH2O. Images (100×) were collected under a Leica microscope (Wetzlar, Germany).

4.6. Statistical Analysis

Comparisons among groups were made using SPSS (Chicago, IL, USA). All the data were reported as mean ± SD. Comparisons between different groups for each point were performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). All tests were 2-tailed, and p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

5. Conclusions

Gli inhibitor HPI-1 could reduce cell proliferation, induce apoptosis, alter cancer stem cell expression and reduce cell migration in breast cancer cells. Targeting Gli-1 could be a potential strategy to suppress breast cancer stem cells.

Author Contributions

K.-S.J. and C.-F.C. conceived, designed the experiments and wrote/edit the manuscript. C.-J.J. and I.-S.S. contributed the design experiments and methods of this study and edit the manuscript. S.-H.W., S.-J.L., C.-H.W. and C.-F.C. performed the experiments. S.-H.W. and C.-F.C. analyzed the data.

Acknowledgments

We appreciate all support and equipment from the Core Laboratory of Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. This study was supported by grants of Far Eastern Memorial Hospital (FEMH-2016-D-056, FEMH-2017-C-001, FEMH-2018-C-062, FEMH105-2320-B-418-001 and FEMH106-2314-B-418-001-MY3) and Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (MOST 106-2314-B-418-001-MY3 and MOST 105-2314-B-418-004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ShhSonic hedgehog
GliGlioma-associated oncogene homolog
HPI-1Hh pathway inhibitor-1
CSCCancer stem cells
IL-6Interleukin-6
NF-κBNuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells
EMTEpithelial-mesenchymal transition
Sox2SRY-box 2
Oct4Octamer-binding transcription factor 4
BCBreast cancer
EREstrogen receptor
PRProgesterone receptor
HERHuman epidermal growth factor receptor
DMEMDulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
FITCFluorescein isothiocyanate
MTT3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide
DMSODimethyl sulfoxide
PIPropidium iodide
MMP2Matrix Metallopeptidase 2
HCCHepatocellular carcinoma
FDAFood and Drug Administration
FBSFetal bovine serum
NEAANon-essential Amino Acid
RTReverse transcription
PCRPolymerase chain reaction
APCAllophycocyanin

References

  1. DeSantis, C.; Ma, J.; Bryan, L.; Jemal, A. Breast cancer statistics, 2013. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2014, 64, 52–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Jemal, A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2016, 66, 7–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Amodio, R.; Zarcone, M.; Cusimano, R.; Campisi, I.; Dolcemascolo, C.; Traina, A.; Agostara, B.; Romano, N. Target therapy in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients. Omics J. Integr. Biol. 2011, 15, 363–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Carli, P.; Turchet, E.; Quitadamo, D.; Spada, A.; Miolo, G.; Lamaj, E.; Spazzapan, S.; Di Lauro, V.; Dolcetti, R.; Veronesi, A.; et al. Target therapy in elderly breast cancer patients. Crit. Rev. Oncol./Hematol. 2012, 83, 422–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fillmore, C.; Kuperwasser, C. Human breast cancer stem cell markers CD44 and CD24: Enriching for cells with functional properties in mice or in man? Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2007, 9, 303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Sheridan, C.; Kishimoto, H.; Fuchs, R.K.; Mehrotra, S.; Bhat-Nakshatri, P.; Turner, C.H.; Goulet, R., Jr.; Badve, S.; Nakshatri, H. CD44+/CD24− breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: An early step necessary for metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2006, 8, R59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Tanaka, H.; Nakamura, M.; Kameda, C.; Kubo, M.; Sato, N.; Kuroki, S.; Tanaka, M.; Katano, M. The Hedgehog signaling pathway plays an essential role in maintaining the CD44+CD24−/low subpopulation and the side population of breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 2147–2157. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Cochrane, C.R.; Szczepny, A.; Watkins, D.N.; Cain, J.E. Hedgehog Signaling in the Maintenance of Cancer Stem Cells. Cancers 2015, 7, 1554–1585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kasper, M.; Jaks, V.; Fiaschi, M.; Toftgard, R. Hedgehog signalling in breast cancer. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 903–911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Hui, M.; Cazet, A.; Nair, R.; Watkins, D.; O’Toole, S.A.; Swarbrick, A. The Hedgehog signalling pathway in breast development, carcinogenesis and cancer therapy. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2013, 15, 203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Flemban, A.; Qualtrough, D. The Potential Role of Hedgehog Signaling in the Luminal/Basal Phenotype of Breast Epithelia and in Breast Cancer Invasion and Metastasis. Cancers 2015, 7, 1863–1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Riaz, S.K.; Khan, J.S.; Shah, S.T.A.; Wang, F.; Ye, L.; Jiang, W.G.; Malik, M.F.A. Involvement of hedgehog pathway in early onset, aggressive molecular subtypes and metastatic potential of breast cancer. Cell Commun. Signal. CCS 2018, 16, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Jeng, K.S.; Sheen, I.S.; Jeng, W.J.; Yu, M.C.; Hsiau, H.I.; Chang, F.Y. High expression of Sonic Hedgehog signaling pathway genes indicates a risk of recurrence of breast carcinoma. OncoTargets Ther. 2013, 7, 79–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Noman, A.S.; Uddin, M.; Chowdhury, A.A.; Nayeem, M.J.; Raihan, Z.; Rashid, M.I.; Azad, A.K.; Rahman, M.L.; Barua, D.; Sultana, A.; et al. Serum sonic hedgehog (SHH) and interleukin-(IL-6) as dual prognostic biomarkers in progressive metastatic breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ge, X.; Lyu, P.; Gu, Y.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fu, C.; Cao, Z. Sonic hedgehog stimulates glycolysis and proliferation of breast cancer cells: Modulation of PFKFB3 activation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015, 464, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cui, W.; Wang, L.H.; Wen, Y.Y.; Song, M.; Li, B.L.; Chen, X.L.; Xu, M.; An, S.X.; Zhao, J.; Lu, Y.Y.; et al. Expression and regulation mechanisms of Sonic Hedgehog in breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 927–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Duan, Z.H.; Wang, H.C.; Zhao, D.M.; Ji, X.X.; Song, M.; Yang, X.J.; Cui, W. Cooperatively transcriptional and epigenetic regulation of sonic hedgehog overexpression drives malignant potential of breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2015, 106, 1084–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Souzaki, M.; Kubo, M.; Kai, M.; Kameda, C.; Tanaka, H.; Taguchi, T.; Tanaka, M.; Onishi, H.; Katano, M. Hedgehog signaling pathway mediates the progression of non-invasive breast cancer to invasive breast cancer. Cancer Sci. 2011, 102, 373–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ten Haaf, A.; Bektas, N.; von Serenyi, S.; Losen, I.; Arweiler, E.C.; Hartmann, A.; Knuchel, R.; Dahl, E. Expression of the glioma-associated oncogene homolog (GLI) 1 in human breast cancer is associated with unfavourable overall survival. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Im, S.; Choi, H.J.; Yoo, C.; Jung, J.H.; Jeon, Y.W.; Suh, Y.J.; Kang, C.S. Hedgehog related protein expression in breast cancer: Gli-2 is associated with poor overall survival. Korean J. Pathol. 2013, 47, 116–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Lei, J.; Fan, L.; Wei, G.; Chen, X.; Duan, W.; Xu, Q.; Sheng, W.; Wang, K.; Li, X. Gli-1 is crucial for hypoxia-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasion of breast cancer. Tumour Biol. J. Int. Soc. Oncodev. Biol. Med. 2015, 36, 3119–3126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhou, M.; Hou, Y.; Yang, G.; Zhang, H.; Tu, G.; Du, Y.E.; Wen, S.; Xu, L.; Tang, X.; Tang, S.; et al. LncRNA-Hh Strengthen Cancer Stem Cells Generation in Twist-Positive Breast Cancer via Activation of Hedgehog Signaling Pathway. Stem Cells 2016, 34, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Das, S.; Samant, R.S.; Shevde, L.A. Nonclassical activation of Hedgehog signaling enhances multidrug resistance and makes cancer cells refractory to Smoothened-targeting Hedgehog inhibition. J. Biol. Chem. 2013, 288, 11824–11833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peiris-Pages, M.; Sotgia, F.; Lisanti, M.P. Chemotherapy induces the cancer-associated fibroblast phenotype, activating paracrine Hedgehog-GLI signalling in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 10728–10745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Arnold, K.M.; Pohlig, R.T.; Sims-Mourtada, J. Co-activation of Hedgehog and Wnt signaling pathways is associated with poor outcomes in triple negative breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 5285–5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Li, X.; Wang, X.; Xie, C.; Zhu, J.; Meng, Y.; Chen, Y.; Li, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, X.; Wang, S.; et al. Sonic hedgehog and Wnt/beta-catenin pathways mediate curcumin inhibition of breast cancer stem cells. Anti-Cancer Drugs 2018, 29, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  27. Abdullah, L.N.; Chow, E.K. Mechanisms of chemoresistance in cancer stem cells. Clin. Transl. Med. 2013, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Zhao, J. Cancer stem cells and chemoresistance: The smartest survives the raid. Pharmacol. Ther. 2016, 160, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Barginear, M.F.; Leung, M.; Budman, D.R. The hedgehog pathway as a therapeutic target for treatment of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 116, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Monkkonen, T.; Lewis, M.T. New paradigms for the Hedgehog signaling network in mammary gland development and breast Cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2017, 1868, 315–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Lauth, M.; Bergstrom, A.; Shimokawa, T.; Toftgard, R. Inhibition of GLI-mediated transcription and tumor cell growth by small-molecule antagonists. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8455–8460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Hou, X.; Chen, X.; Zhang, P.; Fan, Y.; Ma, A.; Pang, T.; Song, Z.; Jin, Y.; Hao, W.; Liu, F.; et al. Inhibition of hedgehog signaling by GANT58 induces apoptosis and shows synergistic antitumor activity with AKT inhibitor in acute T cell leukemia cells. Biochimie 2014, 101, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hyman, J.M.; Firestone, A.J.; Heine, V.M.; Zhao, Y.; Ocasio, C.A.; Han, K.; Sun, M.; Rack, P.G.; Sinha, S.; Wu, J.J.; et al. Small-molecule inhibitors reveal multiple strategies for Hedgehog pathway blockade. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 14132–14137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chenna, V.; Hu, C.; Pramanik, D.; Aftab, B.T.; Karikari, C.; Campbell, N.R.; Hong, S.M.; Zhao, M.; Rudek, M.A.; Khan, S.R.; et al. A polymeric nanoparticle encapsulated small-molecule inhibitor of Hedgehog signaling (NanoHHI) bypasses secondary mutational resistance to Smoothened antagonists. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012, 11, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Xu, Y.; Chenna, V.; Hu, C.; Sun, H.X.; Khan, M.; Bai, H.; Yang, X.R.; Zhu, Q.F.; Sun, Y.F.; Maitra, A.; et al. Polymeric nanoparticle-encapsulated hedgehog pathway inhibitor HPI-1 (NanoHHI) inhibits systemic metastases in an orthotopic model of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 1291–1302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Zanoni, M.; Piccinini, F.; Arienti, C.; Zamagni, A.; Santi, S.; Polico, R.; Bevilacqua, A.; Tesei, A. 3D tumor spheroid models for in vitro therapeutic screening: A systematic approach to enhance the biological relevance of data obtained. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 19103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Imamura, Y.; Mukohara, T.; Shimono, Y.; Funakoshi, Y.; Chayahara, N.; Toyoda, M.; Kiyota, N.; Takao, S.; Kono, S.; Nakatsura, T.; et al. Comparison of 2D- and 3D-culture models as drug-testing platforms in breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2015, 33, 1837–1843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bao, C.; Kim, M.C.; Chen, J.; Song, J.; Ko, H.W.; Lee, H.J. Sulforaphene Interferes with Human Breast Cancer Cell Migration and Invasion through Inhibition of Hedgehog Signaling. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2016, 64, 5515–5524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Benvenuto, M.; Masuelli, L.; De Smaele, E.; Fantini, M.; Mattera, R.; Cucchi, D.; Bonanno, E.; Di Stefano, E.; Frajese, G.V.; Orlandi, A.; et al. In vitro and in vivo inhibition of breast cancer cell growth by targeting the Hedgehog/GLI pathway with SMO (GDC-0449) or GLI (GANT-61) inhibitors. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 9250–9270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Gonnissen, A.; Isebaert, S.; Haustermans, K. Targeting the Hedgehog signaling pathway in cancer: Beyond Smoothened. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 13899–13913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Wang, X.; Wei, S.; Zhao, Y.; Shi, C.; Liu, P.; Zhang, C.; Lei, Y.; Zhang, B.; Bai, B.; Huang, Y.; et al. Anti-proliferation of breast cancer cells with itraconazole: Hedgehog pathway inhibition induces apoptosis and autophagic cell death. Cancer Lett. 2017, 385, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Wright, M.H.; Calcagno, A.M.; Salcido, C.D.; Carlson, M.D.; Ambudkar, S.V.; Varticovski, L. Brca1 breast tumors contain distinct CD44+/CD24− and CD133+ cells with cancer stem cell characteristics. Breast Cancer Res. BCR 2008, 10, R10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Jezierska, A.; Motyl, T. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 involvement in breast cancer progression: A mini-review. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2009, 15, RA32–RA40. [Google Scholar]
  44. Chai, F.; Zhou, J.; Chen, C.; Xie, S.; Chen, X.; Su, P.; Shi, J. The Hedgehog inhibitor cyclopamine antagonizes chemoresistance of breast cancer cells. OncoTargets Ther. 2013, 6, 1643–1647. [Google Scholar]
  45. Che, J.; Zhang, F.Z.; Zhao, C.Q.; Hu, X.D.; Fan, S.J. Cyclopamine is a novel Hedgehog signaling inhibitor with significant anti-proliferative, anti-invasive and anti-estrogenic potency in human breast cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 5, 1417–1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Zhang, X.; Harrington, N.; Moraes, R.C.; Wu, M.F.; Hilsenbeck, S.G.; Lewis, M.T. Cyclopamine inhibition of human breast cancer cell growth independent of Smoothened (Smo). Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2009, 115, 505–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Kameda, C.; Tanaka, H.; Yamasaki, A.; Nakamura, M.; Koga, K.; Sato, N.; Kubo, M.; Kuroki, S.; Tanaka, M.; Katano, M. The Hedgehog pathway is a possible therapeutic target for patients with estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009, 29, 871–879. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Stanton, B.Z.; Peng, L.F. Small-molecule modulators of the Sonic Hedgehog signaling pathway. Mol. BioSyst. 2010, 6, 44–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Scales, S.J.; de Sauvage, F.J. Mechanisms of Hedgehog pathway activation in cancer and implications for therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2009, 30, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Amin, S.H.; Tibes, R.; Kim, J.E.; Hybarger, C.P. Hedgehog antagonist GDC-0449 is effective in the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinoma. Laryngoscope 2010, 120, 2456–2459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Amin, S.H.; Motamedi, K.K.; Ochsner, M.C.; Song, T.E.; Hybarger, C.P. Mechanisms and efficacy of vismodegib in the treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Discov. Med. 2013, 16, 229–232. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  52. Kurebayashi, J.; Koike, Y.; Ohta, Y.; Saitoh, W.; Yamashita, T.; Kanomata, N.; Moriya, T. Anti-cancer stem cell activity of a hedgehog inhibitor GANT61 in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. Cancer Sci. 2017, 108, 918–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Koike, Y.; Ohta, Y.; Saitoh, W.; Yamashita, T.; Kanomata, N.; Moriya, T.; Kurebayashi, J. Anti-cell growth and anti-cancer stem cell activities of the non-canonical hedgehog inhibitor GANT61 in triple-negative breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer 2017, 24, 683–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. O’Toole, S.A.; Machalek, D.A.; Shearer, R.F.; Millar, E.K.; Nair, R.; Schofield, P.; McLeod, D.; Cooper, C.L.; McNeil, C.M.; McFarland, A.; et al. Hedgehog overexpression is associated with stromal interactions and predicts for poor outcome in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2011, 71, 4002–4014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. O’Toole, S.A.; Swarbrick, A.; Sutherland, R.L. The Hedgehog signalling pathway as a therapeutic target in early breast cancer development. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 2009, 13, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijms 19 01375 g001 550
Figure 1. Morphology of breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cells. (a) Cells were cultured in L15 or Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a 24 well plate; (b) Cells were cultured with the same medium in NanoCulture 24-well plate. All images were taken by an optical microscope; (c) Cells were stained with Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled Her2 antibody. Data were collected by a FACS Calibur and analyzed by FlowJo software. The X-axis represented Her2 expression and Y-axis represented the cell number. The results were repeated from three-independent experiments and the representative plot was shown.
Figure 1. Morphology of breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cells. (a) Cells were cultured in L15 or Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with fetal bovine serum (FBS) in a 24 well plate; (b) Cells were cultured with the same medium in NanoCulture 24-well plate. All images were taken by an optical microscope; (c) Cells were stained with Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-labeled Her2 antibody. Data were collected by a FACS Calibur and analyzed by FlowJo software. The X-axis represented Her2 expression and Y-axis represented the cell number. The results were repeated from three-independent experiments and the representative plot was shown.
Ijms 19 01375 g001
Ijms 19 01375 g002 550
Figure 2. Expression of Shh pathway molecules is higher in primary human breast carcinoma T2 cells than in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. MDA-MB-231 and T2 cells were subjected to quantitative PCR for the gene expression of Shh pathway molecules (a) Shh, (b) Ptch, (c)Smo and (d) Gli-1 from 3-independent experiments. (n = 3). ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Figure 2. Expression of Shh pathway molecules is higher in primary human breast carcinoma T2 cells than in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231. MDA-MB-231 and T2 cells were subjected to quantitative PCR for the gene expression of Shh pathway molecules (a) Shh, (b) Ptch, (c)Smo and (d) Gli-1 from 3-independent experiments. (n = 3). ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001.
Ijms 19 01375 g002
Ijms 19 01375 g003 550
Figure 3. Gli inhibitor HPI-1 (Hh pathway inhibitor, HPI) could reduce the cell viability in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 cells. The cell viability of human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cell were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay after 72 h of treatment with Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0 μM), GANT-58 (Panel (a)) or HPI-1 (Panel (b)). The percentages of viable cells treated with a compound or the vehicle control was calculated by normalizing the optical density (O.D.) value to that of the untreated control cultures. The results are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (*** p ≤ 0.001, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO).
Figure 3. Gli inhibitor HPI-1 (Hh pathway inhibitor, HPI) could reduce the cell viability in breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 cells. The cell viability of human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cell were assessed by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay after 72 h of treatment with Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (0 μM), GANT-58 (Panel (a)) or HPI-1 (Panel (b)). The percentages of viable cells treated with a compound or the vehicle control was calculated by normalizing the optical density (O.D.) value to that of the untreated control cultures. The results are represented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three independent experiments performed in triplicate. (*** p ≤ 0.001, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO).
Ijms 19 01375 g003
Ijms 19 01375 g004 550
Figure 4. Inhibition of Hh pathway increased the percentages of apoptotic cells in breast cancer cells. (a) The apoptosis of human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cell were assessed by Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining after 48 h of treatment with DMSO (Control), 40 μM GANT-58 or 40 μM HPI-1. The lower right quadrant (Annexin V+/PI−) was considered as early-stage apoptotic cells, the upper right quadrant (Annexin V+/PI+) was considered late-stage apoptotic cells. The percentages of early or late-stage apoptotic cells were shown; (b) The mean percentage of apoptotic cells were represented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. (* p ≤ 0.05, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, Control).
Figure 4. Inhibition of Hh pathway increased the percentages of apoptotic cells in breast cancer cells. (a) The apoptosis of human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cell were assessed by Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) staining after 48 h of treatment with DMSO (Control), 40 μM GANT-58 or 40 μM HPI-1. The lower right quadrant (Annexin V+/PI−) was considered as early-stage apoptotic cells, the upper right quadrant (Annexin V+/PI+) was considered late-stage apoptotic cells. The percentages of early or late-stage apoptotic cells were shown; (b) The mean percentage of apoptotic cells were represented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. (* p ≤ 0.05, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, Control).
Ijms 19 01375 g004
Ijms 19 01375 g005 550
Figure 5. Gli inhibitor reduced the percentages of cancer stem cells (CD44+CD24low) in T2 cells. (a) Human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cells were collected after 48 h of treatment with DMSO (control), 40 μM GANT-58 or 40 μM HPI-1. Cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies against CD44 and CD24 for cancer stem cells. Data were collected by a FACS Calibur and analyzed by FlowJo software. The lower right quadrant (CD44+CD24low) was considered as cancer stem cells; (b) The mean percentage of cancer stem cells were represented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. (* p < 0.05, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, control).
Figure 5. Gli inhibitor reduced the percentages of cancer stem cells (CD44+CD24low) in T2 cells. (a) Human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cells were collected after 48 h of treatment with DMSO (control), 40 μM GANT-58 or 40 μM HPI-1. Cells were stained with fluorescent antibodies against CD44 and CD24 for cancer stem cells. Data were collected by a FACS Calibur and analyzed by FlowJo software. The lower right quadrant (CD44+CD24low) was considered as cancer stem cells; (b) The mean percentage of cancer stem cells were represented as the mean ± SD of five independent experiments. (* p < 0.05, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, control).
Ijms 19 01375 g005
Ijms 19 01375 g006 550
Figure 6. Gli inhibitor reduced cell migration of breast carcinoma cells. (a) MDA-MB-231 cells or T2 cells were treated with either DMSO (Control), 40 μM GANT-58 (GANT) and 40 μM HPI-1 (HPI) for 24 h. Magnification: 100×; (b) The migrated cells were normalized to vehicle condition as 100% in each experiment. The y-axis represented the relative migrated cells counted under 5 different fields from 3 independent experiments. (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, Control).
Figure 6. Gli inhibitor reduced cell migration of breast carcinoma cells. (a) MDA-MB-231 cells or T2 cells were treated with either DMSO (Control), 40 μM GANT-58 (GANT) and 40 μM HPI-1 (HPI) for 24 h. Magnification: 100×; (b) The migrated cells were normalized to vehicle condition as 100% in each experiment. The y-axis represented the relative migrated cells counted under 5 different fields from 3 independent experiments. (** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, Control).
Ijms 19 01375 g006
Ijms 19 01375 g007 550
Figure 7. Gli inhibition decrease Bcl2 expression and increase Bim expression. The gene expression of human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cell were assessed by qPCR after 48 h of treatment with DMSO (Control), 40 μM GANT-58 (GANT) or 40 μM HPI-1 (HPI). The mean gene expression of (a) Gli (b) Bcl2 (c) Bim (d) MMP-2 was represented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, control).
Figure 7. Gli inhibition decrease Bcl2 expression and increase Bim expression. The gene expression of human breast cancer cell line (MDA-MB-231) and primary human breast carcinoma T2 cell were assessed by qPCR after 48 h of treatment with DMSO (Control), 40 μM GANT-58 (GANT) or 40 μM HPI-1 (HPI). The mean gene expression of (a) Gli (b) Bcl2 (c) Bim (d) MMP-2 was represented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. (* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01, compared with the cultured treated with DMSO, control).
Ijms 19 01375 g007
Table
Table 1. Primers sequences for quantitative PCR.
Table 1. Primers sequences for quantitative PCR.
GenesPrimer sequenceAmplicon (bp)
ShhForward: 5’- GAAAGCAGAGAACTCGGTGG-3170
Reverse: 5’-GGAAAGTGAGGAAGTCGCTG-3’
Ptch-1Forward: 5’-CTCCCAAGCAAATGTACGAGCA-3’148
Reverse: 5’-TGAGTGGAGTTCTGTGCGACAC-3’
SmoForward: 5’- GGGAGGCTACTTCCTCATCC-3167
Reverse: 5’- GGCAGCTGAAGGTAATGAGC-3’
Gli-1Forward: 5’-CTCCCGAAGGACAGGTATGTAAC-3’248
Reverse:5’-CCCTACTCTTTAGGCACTAGAGTTG-3’
Bcl2Forward: 5’-CTG GTG GAC AAC ATC GC-3’135
Reverse: 5’-GGA GAA ATC AAA CAG AGG C-3’
BimForward: 5’-TAAGTTCTGAGTGTGACCGAGA-3’96
Reverse: 5’-GCTCTGTCTGTAGGGAGGTAGG-3’
MMP2Forward: 5’-GATACCCCTTTGACGGTAAGGA-3’112
Reverse: 5’-CCTTCTCCCAAGGTCCATAGC-3’
GAPDHForward: 5’-CACCACCAACTGCTTAG-3’334
Reverse: 5’-CTTCACCACCTTCTTGATG-3’

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeng, K.-S.; Jeng, C.-J.; Sheen, I.-S.; Wu, S.-H.; Lu, S.-J.; Wang, C.-H.; Chang, C.-F. Glioma-Associated Oncogene Homolog Inhibitors Have the Potential of Suppressing Cancer Stem Cells of Breast Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051375

AMA Style

Jeng K-S, Jeng C-J, Sheen I-S, Wu S-H, Lu S-J, Wang C-H, Chang C-F. Glioma-Associated Oncogene Homolog Inhibitors Have the Potential of Suppressing Cancer Stem Cells of Breast Cancer. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(5):1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051375

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeng, Kuo-Shyang, Chi-Juei Jeng, I-Shyan Sheen, Szu-Hua Wu, Ssu-Jung Lu, Chih-Hsuan Wang, and Chiung-Fang Chang. 2018. "Glioma-Associated Oncogene Homolog Inhibitors Have the Potential of Suppressing Cancer Stem Cells of Breast Cancer" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 5: 1375. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19051375

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop