Next Article in Journal
Do Subjects from Different Occupational Groups Experience Dental Fear and Anxiety Equally?
Previous Article in Journal
The Effects of Six Weeks Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Functional and Psychological Outcomes in Long-COVID Patients: Preliminary Results from Serbian Single Center Study
Previous Article in Special Issue
Hepatic Hemangioma: Review of Imaging and Therapeutic Strategies
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Medicina
Volume 60
Issue 4
10.3390/medicina60040673
medicina-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

National Trends in the Incidence of Sporadic Malignant Colorectal Polyps in Young Patients (20–49 Years): An 18-Year SEER Database Analysis

by
Mark M. Aloysius
1,
Tejas Nikumbh
2,*,
Lekha Yadukumar
2,
Udit Asija
2,
Niraj J. Shah
3,
Ganesh Aswath
1,
Savio John
1 and
Hemant Goyal
4,*
1
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, State University of New York Upstate Syracuse, New York, NY 13210, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA 18505, USA
3
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
4
Advanced Endoscopy, Borland Groover Owntown Office, Jacksonville, FL 32207, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2024, 60(4), 673; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040673
Submission received: 19 January 2024 / Revised: 14 April 2024 / Accepted: 19 April 2024 / Published: 21 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Editorial Board Members’ Collection Series: Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Diseases)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background and Objectives: Conflicting guidelines exist for initiating average-risk colorectal cancer screening at the age of 45 years. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) changed its guidelines in 2021 to recommend initiating screening at 45 years due to an increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer. However, the American College of Physicians (ACP) recently recommended not screening average-risk individuals between 45 and 49 years old. We aim to study the national trends in the incidence of sporadic malignant polyps (SMP) in patients from 20 to 49 years old. Materials and Methods: We analyzed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000–2017) on patients aged 20–49 years who underwent diagnostic colonoscopy with at least a single malignant sporadic colorectal polyp. Results: Of the 10,742 patients diagnosed with SMP, 42.9% were female. The mean age of incidence was 43.07 years (42.91–43.23, 95% CI). Approximately 50% of malignant polyps were diagnosed between 45 and 49 years of age, followed by 25–30% between 40 and 45. There was an upward trend in malignant polyps, with a decreased incidence of malignant villous adenomas and a rise in malignant adenomas and tubulovillous adenomas. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that almost half of the SMPs under 50 years occurred in individuals under age 45, younger than the current screening threshold recommended by the ACP. There has been an upward trend in malignant polyps in the last two decades. This reflects changes in tumor biology, and necessitates further research and support in the USPSTF guidelines to start screening at the age of 45 years.

1. Introduction

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer worldwide and the second most common cause of cancer death. More than 1.9 million new colorectal cancer cases and 935,000 deaths were estimated to occur in 2020, representing about 1 in 10 cancer cases and deaths [1]. CRC is commonly diagnosed in older people, and the median age of diagnosis is 67 years [2]. Early-onset CRC, also known as young-onset colorectal carcinoma (YoCRC), is defined as CRC diagnosed in individuals younger than the age of 50 years who did not previously meet the traditional age criteria for average-risk screening in the United States [3,4]. In 2023, approximately 153,020 people will be diagnosed with CRC, and 52,550 will die from the disease, with 19,550 cases and 3750 deaths occurring in people under the age of 50 [5]. Over the last ten years, the incidence of CRC has been steadily increasing, and there is an increased annual incidence of YoCRC. The incidence of YoCRC has nearly doubled since 1990, with an increase of 2% per year, mainly in Western countries [6,7,8]. Based on current trends, it is anticipated that the incidence rates of cancers of the colon and rectum will rise by 90% and 124.2%, respectively, among people in the 20–34 age group, while they will increase by 27.7% and 46.0%, respectively, among patients in the 35–39 age group [6,9]. YoCRC is now the second and fourth most common cause of cancer in men and women under 50 years in the US. The death rate from YoCRC has been progressively increasing, with an estimated 12 deaths per 100,000 as of 2019 [10].
Young-onset colorectal cancer is associated with a number of risk factors, such as obesity, processed meat consumption, alcohol intake, family history, inflammatory bowel disease, genetic predisposition syndromes, and disruption of the gut microbiome [3,11]. Despite one-third of YoCRC being associated with familial risk factors, the majority of YoCRCs do not have associated hereditary syndromes and are linked with microsatellite instability. YoCRCs are more likely to present as advanced-stage III/IV carcinomas, and more frequently display aggressive histological characteristics such as poor differentiation and perineural and blood vessel invasion [12,13,14]. Patients with YoCRC also have a significantly longer median time to diagnosis, symptom duration, and time of evaluation. The time to diagnosis is 1.4 times longer for younger than older patients [14]. The definitive pathogenesis and molecular profile of YoCRC are not well understood, and there are few studies that have addressed this.
The increase in the incidence of YoCRC, together with the significant proportion of cases with sporadic characteristics within this subgroup of CRC, have led multiple societies to recommend starting regular screening by a stool-based test or colonoscopy at age 45 for people at an average risk for CRC. However, conflicting guidelines exist in terms of initiating average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 years. The US Preventive Services Task Force changed its guidelines in 2021 to recommend initiating screening at 45 years due to the increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer [15]. However, the American College of Physicians (ACP) recently recommended not to screen average-risk individuals between 45 and 49 years [16]. The American Cancer Society (ACS) published recommendations for CRC screening for average-risk adults starting at age 45 in May 2018 [17]. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) expanded its recommendations for CRC screening guidelines in 2021 to include adults aged 45–49 [15,18]. This was followed by the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) amending their CRC screening guidelines to begin from 45 years for average-risk individuals [19].
The initiation of screening at age 45 instead of 50 years added 19 million average-risk people to the screening pool and dropped national CRC screening rates for those 50 and older from 68% to 59% [5]. No specific changes in screening recommendations were made for people at higher-than-average risk by the ACS, USPSTF, or ACG. The USPSTF recommends beginning screening for those with a family history of CRC 10 years before the age of the youngest affected relative’s diagnosis or age 40, whichever is earlier [20]. The NCCN guidelines recommend genetic screening for patients with young-onset CRC [21]. It is of value to note that only half of young-onset CRC patients with germline mutations have a history of CRC in a first-degree relative, despite the fact that family history is frequently used to screen for elevated CRC risk [22].
Owing to the lack of screening in younger patients, the incidence of YoCRC reflects diagnostically detected CRCs in symptomatic patients or inherently high-risk patients. Data about the new case trends in sporadic malignant polyps (SMP) in younger patients are limited, given the lack of established screening in those at an average risk of CRC under the age of 45. The lack of uniformity in guidelines prevents definitive management and screening in the 45 to 49 years age group population. Hence, we aimed to study the trends in new cases of sporadic malignant polyps in patients between 20 and 49 years of age over an 18-year period from the National Cancer Institute’s SEER database.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) is an authoritative source of information on cancer incidence and survival in the United States (U.S.). The SEER database contains cancer incidences dating back four decades, from 1975 [23]. It was launched on 1 January 1973 as a part of the National Cancer Act. Initially, 7 registries (SEER 7) with epidemiologically significant populations that consisted of racial and ethnic minorities were included, and this was gradually enlarged to the current 22 cancer registries (SEER 22). SEER collects demographic, clinical, and outcome information on all cancers diagnosed in representative geographic regions and subpopulations. Data are obtained for all primary invasive malignancies and some additional diagnoses, such as in situ carcinomas, and include the date of diagnosis, as well as demographic data such as age, gender, race/ethnicity, and county of residence [24]. Appropriate use of the SEER database can ensure that the correct research conclusions are drawn and maximize the benefits for clinicians and patients [25].
SEER is widely regarded as the gold standard for data quality in US and international cancer registries. For cancer registries worldwide, the SEER Program serves as a model due to its emphasis on quality control from the program’s beginning, its long-standing commitment to representing all population segments, and its recent success in funding research advancements. Contractual arrangements with regional registries ensure quality, and SEER standards must be met before data are transferred [24]. Originally, there were only 9 tumor registries, and now there are 22 US geographic areas participating in the SEER program. Recently, the SEER Program has been moving toward more automation to improve its consistency and reduce delays in cancer reporting. It currently collects and publishes cancer incidence and survival data from population-based cancer registries, covering approximately 41.9 percent of the U.S. population as per the 2020 census, and has the largest geographic coverage available for survival. SEER 17 (accessed in November 2022) includes 17 cancer registries that collect cancer incidence data from various geographic regions of the U.S. SEER 17 contains 1 record for each of 9,208,295 tumors.
The American Community Survey (ACS) is an ongoing community-based survey that has been conducted by the US Census Bureau since 2005. The ACS is the primary source of high-resolution geographic data on the U.S. population. It provides vital demographic, housing, and socioeconomic information, including employment, migration, and disability information about the US population. These community-level indicators, which include occupation, income, and education, have been linked to a number of health outcomes, including life expectancy, self-reported health, chronic conditions, certain types of cancer, mental disorders, cardiovascular disease, obesity, and infant mortality [26]. In fact, studies have assessed the feasibility of linking patient data from HER to microdata from the ACS, with the goal of improving the understanding health disparities and social determinants of health in the population [27]. The ACS denominators generally perform comparably well and yield estimates with little bias [28]. We utilized information from the ACS as a measure for the current population to derive the incidence rates of malignant colorectal polyps. The incidence rates were calculated using a population specific to the particular year as a denominator, per 100,000 people. Because these are de-identified datasets, the study was exempted from review/approval by the Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education’s institutional review board.

2.2. Patient Selection

All patients diagnosed with at least a single malignant colorectal polyp on colonoscopies performed for any indication or screening between 2000 and 2017 were eligible for the analysis. All these patients were stratified according to the 6th edition of AJCC, thus ensuring uniformity in staging. We included data from patients aged between 20 and 49 years, diagnosed over the 18-year time period. Malignant colorectal polyps found during colonoscopy in the entire colon, including the rectum, were included, however, the SEER database does not differentiate data between right vs. left colon or rectum. Most of these patients underwent diagnostic colonoscopies, since screening colonoscopy began at age 50 years prior to 2018, after which, the USPSTF guidelines changed. We excluded familial cancers, lesions with a high microsatellite instability (MSI-H), and Adenomatous polyposis coli (APC).

2.3. Statistical Analysis

We accessed the data using the SEER diagnostic codes 8210/2 and 3 for tubular adenomas, 8221/2 for serrated polyps, 8221/2 and 3 for multiple adenomatous polyps, 8261/3 and 8262/3 for villous adenomas, and 8263/2 and 3 for tubulovillous adenomas. We performed a descriptive statistical analysis using the SPSS v27 Macintosh(SPSS v27, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA). The incidence rates per 100,000 people were calculated using data from the American Community Survey [29]. CRC incidence was stratified based on gender and histology.

3. Results

Between 2000 and 2017, a total of 10,742 patients with biopsy-proven sporadic malignant colorectal polyps between the ages of 20 and 49 years were included. The cohort consisted of 57.1% men and 42.9% women (Table 1).
The average age of malignant colorectal polyp diagnosis was 43.07 years (average age range for CRC diagnosis: 42.92–43.23 years). The annual mean age (95% CI) of new-onset malignant polyps trending over time is visualized in Figure 1. The majority of sporadic malignant polyps were diagnosed in patients aged 45–49 years, with 50% diagnosed between the ages of 45 and 49 and 25–30% diagnosed between the ages of 40 and 44.
The trends of incidence of sporadic malignant polyps were compared with local-stage CRC cases, which is depicted in Figure 2. SEER defines local stage as a malignancy limited to the organ of origin; no spread beyond the organ of origin; and infiltration past the basement membrane of the epithelium into the stroma of the organ. This roughly corresponds to stage T1N0M0, as per the TNM cancer staging classification for CRC. The incidence was calculated using the number of cases of sporadic malignant polyps from the SEER database and divided by the population during the same year in the same age group (20–49 years) obtained from the ACS. Thus, the incidence rate was per 100,000 people for that particular year. Since 2013, there has been a noticeable rise in cases of local-stage CRC, while the incidence of sporadic malignant colorectal polyps remained constant from 2010 to 2019 (~0.5 cases/10,000 population). Table 1 lists the histological subtypes and gender distribution of sporadic malignant colorectal polyps. There has been a significant decrease in new cases of malignant villous adenomas. However, the incidence of malignant tubular adenomatous polyps and tubulovillous adenomas has significantly increased over time. Serrated adenocarcinomas in serrated polyps were reported as very few in the population studied.

4. Discussion

We looked at data from colonoscopies performed on symptomatic patients across the country. The objective of the present study was to analyze the incidence and trends of young-onset CRC between 2000 and 2017. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest known cohort to date, where we analyzed 10,742 cases of sporadic young-onset CRC over a period of 18 years across the United States.
One in five patients diagnosed with CRC under 50 years of age has a genetic predisposition syndrome [11]. There are multi-society guidelines to begin early screening in these individuals [30,31]. However, the detection of cancer among the other 80 percent of patients poses a considerable challenge, since there is no family history to advocate for early screening in this group. Conflicting guidelines exist in terms of initiating average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 years. The USPSTF changed its guidelines in 2021 to recommend initiating screening at 45 years due to the increasing incidence of young-onset colorectal cancer [15]. It expanded its recommendations for CRC screening guidelines in 2021 to include adults aged 45–49 [15,18]. The ACP recently recommended not to screen average-risk individuals between 45 and 49 years [16]. This ACP guideline was based on the absence of direct evidence that screening younger individuals reduces CRC incidence or mortality [16,32].
Of note is that early experiences with screening in the 45 to 49 years group show similar rates of neoplasia as those in the 50 to 55 years group of patients [33]. Lowering the starting age of population screening for sporadic CRC to 45 years also seems to be cost-effective. Our data support screening for CRC in the younger population. The average age of CRC diagnosis was 43.07 years (range: 42.92–43.23), which is well below the ACP recommendation to start screening at 50 years. In fact, it is also lower than the USPSTF recommendation to start CRC screening at 45 years. This lack of uniformity prevents having definitive guidelines for screening in the 45 to 49 years population.
According to studies conducted around the world, the incidence of CRC is increasing in people under 50 and at a slower rate in people over 50 [34,35,36]. The total incidence of YoCRC in the United States and the number of cases of advanced-stage colorectal carcinomas increased twofold between 1990 and 2013, according to a study analyzing the SEER database [37]. While older research has established that diabetes and obesity are risk factors in the younger population [38], Austin et al. studied mean body mass index (BMI) increases across age groups, which was unable to explain the selective increase in incidence amongst younger age groups compared to the older population [39].
Our study population comprised 42.9% females, and showed increased incidence in both genders. Although there was no significant gender preponderance in our study, it was seen that, during some years, females were diagnosed with a higher number of cases of YoCRC. Our results are consistent with those of Lall et al., who found that young females are more susceptible to CRCs [40]. In contrast, some cohorts revealed a marginally higher incidence of YoCRC in men compared to women, with women consistently having fewer cases than men, while other studies found no difference between the two genders over the past three decades [37,41]. It has been studied that gender and body mass index (BMI) are associated with CRC diagnosis at a younger age, and there is a linear relationship between BMI and YoCRC [42,43]. Men are more likely than women to be diagnosed with CRC according to global trends; this has been attributed to a number of factors, including the frequency of colonoscopies, race, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage [41,44].
The mean age at presentation and diagnosis of sporadic malignant polyps in our study was 43 years (42.9–43.23, 95% CI). As shown in Figure 1, the average age at which malignant polyps is diagnosed has decreased since 2014. The majority of malignant polyps (50%) were discovered in patients between the ages of 45 and 49, with 25 to 30 percent discovered in patients between the ages of 40 and 44. The SEER study by Wang et al. found a similar pattern, with 27% of cases diagnosed between 40 and 45 and 47% between 45 and 49 [37]. According to Abualkhair et al., 95.1% of CRCs diagnosed between the ages of 45 and 50 are invasive, with 46% increased incidence rates in 1 year age transitions [45]. The patients in our study who underwent colonoscopies had symptoms that persisted and necessitated diagnostic scopes. These lesions would have been discovered earlier had screening been performed at an earlier age.
Our analysis revealed a stable trend in overall local-stage CRCs over time, however, there has been a steady increase in the subset of sporadic malignant polyps (Figure 2). This is an interesting trend which implies that, while the number of CRCs accounted for by sporadic malignant polyps has remained steady, there has been a rise in polyps that are going undetected and progressing to local-stage CRC at presentation. This could mean an increase in the incidence of adenomas in the younger age group which progress to CRC before they are detected. Patients in the age group of 20–49 years have not been subject to CRC screening until recently, when the minimum age for cancer screening was decreased from 50 to 45 years by the USPSTF in 2019 [46]. This could also mean that there are ‘alternative’ pathways other than the traditional adenoma–carcinoma sequence of CRC which are at play. Recently, there has been increasing interest in and evidence in favor of the serrated carcinogenesis pathway [47]. Serrated polyps are the second most common type of polyp identified during a colonoscopy (after conventional adenomas). Approximately 15–30% of CRCs arise from the serrated polyp pathway. Evidence suggests that serrated polyp subtypes, especially traditional serrated adenoma (TSA) and sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P), can cause adenocarcinoma via the serrated route. Additionally, the data indicate that SSA/Ps are the precursors of CRC through microsatellite instability (MSI) and could rapidly progress to malignancy [48]. Recent data from surveillance colonoscopies after the development of YoCRC have shown that the absence or presence of polyps is an important prognostic factor. The development of polyps during surveillance shows that it is necessary to extend the follow-up time, even in cases with microsatellite-stable YoCRC [49].
Over the course of this 18-year analysis, histopathology trends showed an increase in malignant tubular and tubulovillous adenomas and a gradual decline in malignant villous adenomas. YoCRC patients are known to be more likely to develop poorly differentiating aggressive forms of CRC, which have worse prognoses [38,50,51,52]. According to a study by Abualkhair et al. that spanned over 15 years, the incidence of localized CRC increased by 75.9%, that of regional CRC increased by 30%, and that of advanced CRC increased by 15.7% between the ages of 49 and 50 [45]. Similar research found that 90% of polyps were tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia, with tubulovillous adenomas with low-grade dysplasia making up 8% of these polyps [40]. Seven serrated adenocarcinomas in serrated polyps were found in our study during this period. Serrated adenomas are frequently found in the proximal colon and are challenging to see without improved colonoscopic techniques [53]. Vogelstein et al. described the pathogenesis of YoCRC to be based on an adenoma to carcinoma sequence [54]. However, this cannot explain genetic etiologies of CRC, as these appear phenotypically different from old CRC [55]. Changes in genotypic driver mutations in the adenoma–carcinoma sequence have been linked to phenotypic profile changes found in YoCRC. Many genes identified to have caused mutations in YoCRC are not commonly seen in the presumed adenoma–carcinoma sequencing. Further research should focus on younger patients with sporadic malignant colorectal polyps [56,57].
It is important to consider the fact that gastrointestinal diseases are responsible for considerable healthcare use and expenditure. In 2018 alone, gastrointestinal healthcare expenditures totaled USD 119.6 billion in the United States [58]. Increasing awareness about early CRC detection through regular screening is an effective strategy to reduce the economic burden of CRC [59]. In the past 5 years, the USPTF, ACG, and ACS updated their screening recommendations for CRC from the age of 50 to start at the age of 45 years [17,18,19]. The biggest challenge in the near future will be to improve screening in the newly eligible, those overdue and unscreened, and reduce barriers to cancer care [32]. Since this modification to standard CRC screening, there have not been enough studies looking at the prevalence of YoCRC. Our study examined data collected prior to 2018, when screening recommendations changed and colonoscopies were performed in response to symptomatic presentations. We noticed a significant increase in the incidence of YoCRC in patients aged 45–49, as well as those aged 40–45 years. It is known that these polyps might have existed years before the age of screening; if these cases had been screened for earlier, the majority of diagnoses of YoCRC might have been avoided [60]. We also looked at changes in the histopathological trends of young-onset malignant polyps, which are probably the result of evolving genotypic mutations. Additionally, there is a need for more studies to better understand the pathogenesis and evolution of YoCRC.
Among our study’s strengths is that SEER remains widely regarded as the gold standard for data quality among cancer registries in the United States and around the world. We leveraged the strengths of the SEER program with regard to representativeness and generalizability to the U.S. population, the lengthy period of data collection, the large numbers of cases, and the collection of cancer specific outcomes. The registry includes patients treated in a wide range of practice settings and currently represents 42% of the US population. SEER’s stringent protocols and quality control ensure data reliability and accuracy. The SEER database was used to provide epidemiological trends in sporadic malignant polyps of young onset in our study. We calculated the incidence per 100,000 people in the United States to provide a standardized denominator for comparison.
Since this is a population-based retrospective study, it has some inherent limitations. The SEER database has an inclusion bias, with limited staging and metastatic data recorded. Because the database only collects malignant data, we were unable to include any pre-malignant lesions. SEER only reports first treatment interventions. As a result, there was no information on the subsequent recurrence of malignant polyps. However, recurrence data should not be used to calculate the incidence of primary sporadic malignant polyps. There is also a lack of information on comorbidities. Furthermore, detailed information regarding treatment and prognosis is lacking. Nonetheless, the study remains convincing, given the large demographics.

5. Conclusions

Malignant sporadic polyps account for one-quarter of all localized CRCs diagnosed in people under the age of 50. Significant upward trends in sporadic malignant polyps were observed over time, possibly reflecting changes in tumor biology, necessitating further research. The majority of these sporadic malignant polyps were diagnosed between 40 and 49 years. These findings may have potential implications for future CRC screening strategies in younger patients. Improving screening in the newly eligible population within a framework of health equity and reducing barriers to care remains important to further reduce the burden of CRC.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M.A. and H.G.; methodology, N.J.S. and H.G.; validation, M.M.A.; formal analysis, M.M.A.; data curation, M.M.A.; writing—original draft preparation, L.Y., U.A. and T.N.; writing—review and editing, T.N., S.J. and G.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Review Board of The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education. Approval code 1698777-1. Approval date: December 17, 2020.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study as per SEER policies.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are openly available within the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database at http://seer.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 21 October 2023). NIH. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End results (SEER) program. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 21 October 2023). The Registry of Research Data Repositories persistent identifier for this resource is RRID: nif-0000-21366.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Goding Sauer, A.; Fedewa, S.A.; Butterly, L.F.; Anderson, J.C.; Cercek, A.; Smith, R.A.; Jemal, A. Colorectal Cancer Statistics, 2020. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2020, 70, 145–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Soerjomataram, I.; Hayes, R.B.; Bray, F.; Weber, T.K.; Jemal, A. Global Patterns and Trends in Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Young Adults. Gut 2019, 68, 2179–2185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vuik, F.E.; Nieuwenburg, S.A.; Bardou, M.; Lansdorp-Vogelaar, I.; Dinis-Ribeiro, M.; Bento, M.J.; Zadnik, V.; Pellisé, M.; Esteban, L.; Kaminski, M.F.; et al. Increasing Incidence of Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults in Europe over the Last 25 Years. Gut 2019, 68, 1820–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Siegel, R.L.; Wagle, N.S.; Cercek, A.; Smith, R.A.; Jemal, A. Colorectal Cancer Statistics, 2023. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2023, 73, 233–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Bailey, C.E.; Hu, C.-Y.; You, Y.N.; Bednarski, B.K.; Rodriguez-Bigas, M.A.; Skibber, J.M.; Cantor, S.B.; Chang, G.J. Increasing Disparities in the Age-Related Incidences of Colon and Rectal Cancers in the United States, 1975–2010. JAMA Surg. 2015, 150, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Goyal, H.; Desai, R.; Aloysius, M.M.; Jecmenica, M.; Enders, G.H.; Bansal, P. Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Hospitalization Trends and Gender Disparities in the United States 2010–2014. Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2019, 34, 1611–1615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Mauri, G.; Sartore-Bianchi, A.; Russo, A.-G.; Marsoni, S.; Bardelli, A.; Siena, S. Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Young Individuals. Mol. Oncol. 2019, 13, 109–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Ashktorab, H.; Kupfer, S.S.; Brim, H.; Carethers, J.M. Racial Disparity in Gastrointestinal Cancer Risk. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 910–923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. CDC. Colorectal Cancer Statistics. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistics/ (accessed on 27 November 2023).
  11. O’Reilly, M.; Linehan, A.; Krstic, A.; Kolch, W.; Sheahan, K.; Winter, D.C.; Mc Dermott, R. Oncotherapeutic Strategies in Early Onset Colorectal Cancer. Cancers 2023, 15, 552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sultan, I.; Rodriguez-Galindo, C.; El-Taani, H.; Pastore, G.; Casanova, M.; Gallino, G.; Ferrari, A. Distinct Features of Colorectal Cancer in Children and Adolescents: A Population-based Study of 159 Cases. Cancer 2010, 116, 758–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rodriguez, L.; Brennan, K.; Karim, S.; Nanji, S.; Patel, S.V.; Booth, C.M. Disease Characteristics, Clinical Management, and Outcomes of Young Patients With Colon Cancer: A Population-Based Study. Clin. Color. Cancer 2018, 17, e651–e661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chen, F.W.; Sundaram, V.; Chew, T.A.; Ladabaum, U. Advanced-Stage Colorectal Cancer in Persons Younger Than 50 Years Not Associated With Longer Duration of Symptoms or Time to Diagnosis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2017, 15, 728–737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Knudsen, A.B.; Rutter, C.M.; Peterse, E.F.P.; Lietz, A.P.; Seguin, C.L.; Meester, R.G.S.; Perdue, L.A.; Lin, J.S.; Siegel, R.L.; Doria-Rose, V.P.; et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Updated Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force; U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Evidence Syntheses, Formerly Systematic Evidence Reviews; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US): Rockville, MD, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  16. Qaseem, A.; Harrod, C.S.; Crandall, C.J.; Wilt, T.J.; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Wilt, T.J.; Crandall, C.J.; Balk, E.M.; Cooney, T.G.; Cross, J.T.; et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults: A Guidance Statement from the American College of Physicians (Version 2). Ann. Intern. Med. 2023, 176, 1092–1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. ACS. American Cancer Society Guidelines for the Early Detection of Cancer. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/healthy/find-cancer-early/american-cancer-society-guidelines-for-the-early-detection-of-cancer.html (accessed on 27 December 2023).
  18. USPSTF. Colorectal Cancer: Screening. Available online: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/colorectal-cancer-screening (accessed on 27 November 2023).
  19. Shaukat, A.; Kahi, C.J.; Burke, C.A.; Rabeneck, L.; Sauer, B.G.; Rex, D.K. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2021, 116, 458–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rex, D.K.; Boland, C.R.; Dominitz, J.A.; Giardiello, F.M.; Johnson, D.A.; Kaltenbach, T.; Levin, T.R.; Lieberman, D.; Robertson, D.J. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients from the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 307–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Provenzale, D.; Ness, R.M.; Llor, X.; Weiss, J.M.; Abbadessa, B.; Cooper, G.; Early, D.S.; Friedman, M.; Giardiello, F.M.; Glaser, K.; et al. NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 2.2020: Featured Updates to the NCCN Guidelines. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2020, 18, 1312–1320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Stoffel, E.M.; Koeppe, E.; Everett, J.; Ulintz, P.; Kiel, M.; Osborne, J.; Williams, L.; Hanson, K.; Gruber, S.B.; Rozek, L.S. Germline Genetic Features of Young Individuals with Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology 2018, 154, 897–905.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. NIH. National Cancer Institute: Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Pro-Gram. Available online: https://seer.cancer.gov/ (accessed on 21 October 2023).
  24. Park, H.S.; Lloyd, S.; Decker, R.H.; Wilson, L.D.; Yu, J.B. Overview of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database: Evolution, Data Variables, and Quality Assurance. Curr. Probl. Cancer 2012, 36, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Che, W.-Q.; Li, Y.-J.; Tsang, C.-K.; Wang, Y.-J.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.-Y.; Xu, A.-D.; Lyu, J. How to Use the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Data: Research Design and Methodology. Mil. Med. Res. 2023, 10, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Liang, Z.; Nau, C.; Xie, F.; Vogel, R.; Chen, W. The Application of Community-Based Information from the American Community Survey in a Large Integrated Health Care Organization. Perm. J. 2020, 25, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Udalova, V.; Carey, T.S.; Chelminski, P.R.; Dalzell, L.; Knoepp, P.; Motro, J.; Entwisle, B. Linking Electronic Health Records to the American Community Survey: Feasibility and Process. Am. J. Public Health 2022, 112, 923–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Nethery, R.C.; Rushovich, T.; Peterson, E.; Chen, J.T.; Waterman, P.D.; Krieger, N.; Waller, L.; Coull, B.A. Comparing Denominator Sources for Real-Time Disease Incidence Modeling: American Community Survey and WorldPop. SSM-Popul. Health 2021, 14, 100786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. United States Census Bureau. American Community Survey (ACS). Available online: https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs (accessed on 21 October 2023).
  30. Wilkinson, A.N.; Lieberman, D.; Leontiadis, G.I.; Tse, F.; Barkun, A.N.; Abou-Setta, A.; Marshall, J.K.; Samadder, J.; Singh, H.; Telford, J.J.; et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening for Patients with a Family History of Colorectal Cancer or Adenomas. Can. Fam. Physician 2019, 65, 784–789. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Wilkins, T.; McMechan, D.; Talukder, A.; Herline, A. Colorectal Cancer Screening and Surveillance in Individuals at Increased Risk. Am. Fam. Physician 2018, 97, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Shaukat, A.; Crockett, S.D. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Time to Spring Forward. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 119, 395–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ladabaum, U.; Shepard, J.; Mannalithara, A. Adenoma and Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rates at Screening Colonoscopy for Ages 45–49 Years vs Older Ages Since the Introduction of New Colorectal Cancer Screening Guidelines. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2022, 20, 2895–2904.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Yong, K.K.; Kyaw, M.; Chadwick, G.; Sundaram, K. Increasing Incidence of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancers in the UK and Rising Mortality in Rectal Cancers. Gut 2020, 69, 2267–2268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Sung, J.J.Y.; Chiu, H.-M.; Jung, K.-W.; Jun, J.K.; Sekiguchi, M.; Matsuda, T.; Kyaw, M.H. Increasing Trend in Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer in Asia: More Cancers in Men and More Rectal Cancers. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 114, 322–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lui, R.N.; Tsoi, K.K.F.; Ho, J.M.W.; Lo, C.M.; Chan, F.C.H.; Kyaw, M.H.; Sung, J.J.Y. Global Increasing Incidence of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer Across 5 Continents: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis of 1,922,167 Cases. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2019, 28, 1275–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wang, W.; Chen, W.; Lin, J.; Shen, Q.; Zhou, X.; Lin, C. Incidence and Characteristics of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States: An Analysis of SEER Data Collected from 1988 to 2013. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2019, 43, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ahnen, D.J.; Wade, S.W.; Jones, W.F.; Sifri, R.; Mendoza Silveiras, J.; Greenamyer, J.; Guiffre, S.; Axilbund, J.; Spiegel, A.; You, Y.N. The Increasing Incidence of Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Call to Action. Mayo Clin. Proc. 2014, 89, 216–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Austin, H.; Jane Henley, S.; King, J.; Richardson, L.C.; Eheman, C. Changes in Colorectal Cancer Incidence Rates in Young and Older Adults in the United States: What Does It Tell Us about Screening. Cancer Causes Control. 2014, 25, 191–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Lall, V.; Ismail, A.G.M.; Ayonrinde, O.T. Disparate Age and Sex Distribution of Sessile Serrated Lesions and Conventional Adenomas in an Outpatient Colonoscopy Population–Implications for Colorectal Cancer Screening? Int. J. Colorectal. Dis. 2022, 37, 1569–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Shepherdson, M.; Leemaqz, S.; Singh, G.; Ryder, C.; Ullah, S.; Canuto, K.; Young, J.P.; Price, T.J.; McKinnon, R.A.; Pandol, S.J.; et al. Young-Onset Gastrointestinal Adenocarcinoma Incidence and Survival Trends in the Northern Territory, Australia, with Emphasis on Indigenous Peoples. Cancers 2022, 14, 2870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Shen, J.; Wu, Y.; Mo, M.; Feng, X.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Z.; Cai, G.; Zheng, Y. Risk Factors Associated with Early-Onset Colorectal Neoplasm in Chinese Youth: A Prospective Population-Based Study. Front. Oncol. 2021, 11, 702322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Abdel-Rahman, O.; Karachiwala, H.; Koski, S. Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis among Younger Adults in a Real-World, Population-Based Cohort. Future Oncol. 2022, 18, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Siegel, R.L.; Miller, K.D.; Fedewa, S.A.; Ahnen, D.J.; Meester, R.G.S.; Barzi, A.; Jemal, A. Colorectal Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2017, 67, 177–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Abualkhair, W.H.; Zhou, M.; Ahnen, D.; Yu, Q.; Wu, X.-C.; Karlitz, J.J. Trends in Incidence of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in the United States Among Those Approaching Screening Age. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e1920407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. US Preventive Services Task Force; Davidson, K.W.; Barry, M.J.; Mangione, C.M.; Cabana, M.; Caughey, A.B.; Davis, E.M.; Donahue, K.E.; Doubeni, C.A.; Krist, A.H.; et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2021, 325, 1965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Saldana, C.; Urman, J.M.; Gomez, M.; Basterra, M.; Irisarri, R.; Amorena, E.; Garaigorta, M.; Francisco, G.; Ruiz-Clavijo, D.; Gomez-Doronsorro, M.L.; et al. Association between Ser-Rated Polyps and the Risk of Synchronous Colorectal Cancer: A Community-Based Study. Color. Cancer 2021, 7, 8308. [Google Scholar]
  48. Szylberg, Ł.; Janiczek, M.; Popiel, A.; Marszałek, A. Serrated Polyps and Their Alternative Pathway to the Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterol. Res. Pract. 2015, 2015, 573814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Perea García, J.; Arribas, J.; Cañete, Á.; García, J.L.; Álvaro, E.; Tapial, S.; Narváez, C.; Vivas, A.; Brandáriz, L.; Hernández-Villafranca, S.; et al. Association of Polyps with Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and Throughout Surveillance: Novel Clinical and Molecular Implications. Cancers 2019, 11, 1900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. You, Y.N. Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer: Is It Time to Pay Attention? Arch. Intern. Med. 2012, 172, 287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Bhandari, A.; Woodhouse, M.; Gupta, S. Colorectal Cancer Is a Leading Cause of Cancer Incidence and Mortality among Adults Younger than 50 Years in the Usa: A Seer-Based Analysis with Comparison to Other Young-Onset Cancers. J. Investig. Med. 2017, 65, 311–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Holowatyj, A.N.; Ruterbusch, J.J.; Rozek, L.S.; Cote, M.L.; Stoffel, E.M. Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Survival Among Patients With Young-Onset Colorectal Cancer. JCO 2016, 34, 2148–2156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Luisetto, M.; Ahmadabadi, B.N.; Nili-Ahmadabadi, H.; Rafa, A.Y.; Abdul, G. Comparison of Risk Factors and Molecular Analysis of Right-Sided Colon and Left Sided Colon Cancer. Sci. World J. Cancer Sci. Ther. 2019, 1, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vogelstein, B.; Kinzler, K.W. Cancer Genes and the Pathways They Control. Nat. Med. 2004, 10, 789–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Parsons, D.W.; Wang, T.-L.; Samuels, Y.; Bardelli, A.; Cummins, J.M.; DeLong, L.; Silliman, N.; Ptak, J.; Szabo, S.; Willson, J.K.V.; et al. Mutations in a Signalling Pathway. Nature 2005, 436, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Smit, W.L.; Spaan, C.N.; Johannes De Boer, R.; Ramesh, P.; Martins Garcia, T.; Meijer, B.J.; Vermeulen, J.L.M.; Lezzerini, M.; MacInnes, A.W.; Koster, J.; et al. Driver Mutations of the Adenoma-Carcinoma Sequence Govern the Intestinal Epithelial Global Translational Capacity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 117, 25560–25570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Carvalho, B.; Sillars-Hardebol, A.H.; Postma, C.; Mongera, S.; Droste, J.T.S.; Obulkasim, A.; Van De Wiel, M.; Van Criekinge, W.; Ylstra, B.; Fijneman, R.J.A.; et al. Colorectal Adenoma to Carcinoma Progression Is Accompanied by Changes in Gene Expression Associated with Ageing, Chromosomal Instability, and Fatty Acid Metabolism. Cell. Oncol. 2012, 35, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Peery, A.F.; Crockett, S.D.; Murphy, C.C.; Jensen, E.T.; Kim, H.P.; Egberg, M.D.; Lund, J.L.; Moon, A.M.; Pate, V.; Barnes, E.L.; et al. Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic Diseases in the United States: Update 2021. Gastroenterology 2022, 162, 621–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Schlueter, D.; DeGroff, A.; Soloe, C.; Arena, L.; Melillo, S.; Tangka, F.; Hoover, S.; Subramanian, S. Factors That Support Sustainability of Health Systems Change to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Primary Care Clinics: A Longitudinal Qualitative Study. Health Promot. Pract. 2023, 24, 755–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bhat, S.K.; East, J.E. Colorectal Cancer: Prevention and Early Diagnosis. Medicine 2015, 43, 295–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Medicina 60 00673 g001
Figure 1. Age of malignant colorectal polyp incidence over time in 20- to 50-year age group.
Figure 1. Age of malignant colorectal polyp incidence over time in 20- to 50-year age group.
Medicina 60 00673 g001
Medicina 60 00673 g002
Figure 2. Observed incidence per 100,000 of sporadic malignant polyps and local-stage CRC cases.
Figure 2. Observed incidence per 100,000 of sporadic malignant polyps and local-stage CRC cases.
Medicina 60 00673 g002
Table 1. Gender distribution and histological trend over time (2000–2017) of malignant colorectal polyps in patients aged 20–49 years.
Table 1. Gender distribution and histological trend over time (2000–2017) of malignant colorectal polyps in patients aged 20–49 years.
200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011201220132014201520162017
Female226235242242223235282307293329355315346332342315332340
Male245233266250247268286291356349325365341316379356389306
Adenocarcinoma in adenomatous polyp169152191166184179239237245270247283281276309298280275
Serrated adenocarcinoma000001001000020012
Adenocarcinoma in multiple adenomatous polyp132436131021342010
Adenocarcinoma in villous adenoma108112101101919593101101969179726164594946
Adenocarcinoma in tubulovillous adenoma193212214221192222244257301312340317331305346314390323
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Aloysius, M.M.; Nikumbh, T.; Yadukumar, L.; Asija, U.; Shah, N.J.; Aswath, G.; John, S.; Goyal, H. National Trends in the Incidence of Sporadic Malignant Colorectal Polyps in Young Patients (20–49 Years): An 18-Year SEER Database Analysis. Medicina 2024, 60, 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040673

AMA Style

Aloysius MM, Nikumbh T, Yadukumar L, Asija U, Shah NJ, Aswath G, John S, Goyal H. National Trends in the Incidence of Sporadic Malignant Colorectal Polyps in Young Patients (20–49 Years): An 18-Year SEER Database Analysis. Medicina. 2024; 60(4):673. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040673

Chicago/Turabian Style

Aloysius, Mark M., Tejas Nikumbh, Lekha Yadukumar, Udit Asija, Niraj J. Shah, Ganesh Aswath, Savio John, and Hemant Goyal. 2024. "National Trends in the Incidence of Sporadic Malignant Colorectal Polyps in Young Patients (20–49 Years): An 18-Year SEER Database Analysis" Medicina 60, no. 4: 673. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60040673

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop