Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Evaluation of Titanium Plates for Osteoesynthesis High Neck Condylar Fracture of Mandible
Previous Article in Journal
In-Situ Surface Modification of Terpinen-4-ol Plasma Polymers for Increased Antibacterial Activity
Previous Article in Special Issue
Impact of Basalt Filler and Ceramizable Additives on the Toxicity of Gaseous Products Emitted from Thermal Decomposition of Silicone Rubber Composites
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 3
10.3390/ma13030585
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization of Ethylene–propylene Composites Filled with Perlite and Vermiculite Minerals: Mechanical, Barrier, and Flammability Properties

by
Bolesław Szadkowski
1,*,
Anna Marzec
1,*,
Przemysław Rybiński
2,
Witold Żukowski
3 and
Marian Zaborski
1
1
Institute of Polymer and Dye Technology, Faculty of Chemistry, Lodz University of Technology, Stefanowskiego 12/16, 90-924 Lodz, Poland
2
Institute of Chemistry, The Jan Kochanowski University, Żeromskiego 5, 25-369 Kielce, Poland
3
Department of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Cracow University of Technology, 31-155 Kraków, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(3), 585; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030585
Submission received: 20 November 2019 / Revised: 20 January 2020 / Accepted: 21 January 2020 / Published: 27 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Methods of Flame Retardant Treatment of Polymeric Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Perlite and vermiculite are naturally occurring minerals, commonly used by industry to obtain highly thermoisolative and/or non-flammable materials. However, there has been little research into the preparation and application of rubber compounds containing these inexpensive mineral fillers. Here, we show the benefits of perlite and vermiculite minerals as fillers for ethylene-propylene rubber (EPM) composites. To obtain more uniform dispersion and improved compatibility between the minerals and the elastomer matrix, 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (AMIMTFSI) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (BMIMTFSI) imidazolium ionic liquids (ILs) were added. The mineral fillers were found to be attractive semi-reinforcing fillers, which also act as flame retardants in the elastomer composites. Furthermore, a higher content of vermiculite mineral significantly reduced the air permeability of the composites. The incorporation of ionic liquids into the EPM-filled systems had a considerable effect on the torque increment, crosslink density, and more importantly the flammability of the studied compounds. The application of 2.5 parts per hundred parts of rubber (phr) BMIMTFSI, in particular, reduced the flammability of the EPM composite, as the maximum heat release rate (HRRmax) decreased from 189.7 kW/m2 to 170.2 kW/m2.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Elastomer materials have found a wide range of applications in many sectors, such as the aircraft, marine, and construction industries, due to their properties, such as light weight, good toughness, and thermal resistance [1]. Superior qualities such as gas and solvent barrier properties, mechanical strength, and high fire retardancy are additional important characteristics. The fire retardancy of polymer materials can be improved by the addition of flame retardant additives, or by processing following the polymerization process [2]. Recently, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) [3,4,5], layered double hydroxides [6,7], montmorillonite (MMT) [8,9,10], and halloysite [11] have been proposed as halogen-free fire-retardant materials. Other compounds used as eco-friendly fire-retardant compounds in polymers include chitosan phosphate, starch-based materials, and melamine [12,13]. Metal hydroxides and phosphorous compounds are also interesting halogen-free fire-retardant compounds for polymers, due to their low toxicity and low cost [14].
Vermiculite clay ((Mg,Fe,Al)3(Al,Si)4O10(OH)2·4H2O), a mica-type silicate, is known for its flame-retardant properties [15,16]. An interesting property of vermiculite (VMT) is its exfoliation at elevated temperature, due to the loss of water in the interlayers [17]. Its many advantages include high resistance to chemicals and heat, cation interchangeability, temperature retention, and water adsorption capacity [18,19]. Vermiculite has also been used as a reinforcement for the preparation of polymer nanocomposites. Takahashi et al. [20] used VMT to enhance the gas barrier properties of butyl rubber coatings. Due to its heat-resistant characteristics, VMT has been applied in flame-resistant polypropylene composites [21,22]. When incorporated into polyurethanes, VMT simultaneously improves its tensile and flexural strength [23].
Another interesting inorganic compound is perlite (PT). Formed by the cooling of volcanic eruptions, it is mainly composed of SiO2, Al2O3, K2O, Na2O, and water. However, depending on its origin PT may also contain TiO2, CaO, and MgO [24]. As with VMT, when subjected to thermal treatment PT particles expand up to 20 times in volume, due to the water vaporization [25]. Applications of polyethylene prepared with the addition of PT have been reported previously [26,27]. Recently, Karaca et al. [28] showed that PT enhanced the thermal stability and sound absorption coefficients of polyesters. However, there have until now been no reports in the literature regarding the application of VMT and PT fillers in ethylene–propylene rubber (EPM) elastomer to improve its fire retardancy.
In this work, natural PT and VMT materials were added for the first time to EPM rubber at different concentrations and studied for their effects on its mechanical and flame-resistant properties. Two ionic liquids (ILs), 1-allyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (AMIMTFSI) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (BIMTFSI), were used as dispersing agents. Their impact on the flammability of the EPM composites was also studied. The ionic salts were selected based on our previous studies, in which they had been used to improve silica and hydrotalcite dispersion in acrylonitrile-butadiene (NBR) and carboxylated acrylonitrile-butadiene (XNBR) rubber, respectively [29,30,31].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

Ethylene–propylene rubber with the commercial name Dutral CO-54, provided by Versalis S.p.A. (Milan, Italy), was applied as an elastomer matrix. The crosslinking system consisted of dicumyl peroxide (DCP) as a curing agent and 1,3,5-triallyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6(1H,3H,5H)-trione (TTT) as a crosslinking co-agent, both purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (Schnelldorf, Germany). 1-Allyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (AMIMTFSI) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide (BMIMTFSI) were also purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. Two different mineral fillers were used, perlite (PT) and vermiculite (VMT) from Torimex-chemicals Ltd. Sp. z o.o. (Lodz, Poland).

2.2. Preparation and Characterization Techniques

Elastomer blends were prepared on a laboratory mixing mill with a roll length of 330 mm and a diameter of 140 mm. Each compound was mixed with friction of 1.1, at a temperature of 40 °C, for approximately 15 min. The EPM was first masticated for 3 min on the mill. The other the ingredients (filler, dispersing agents and curing agent) were then successively added to the EPM matrix. Prior the composite preparation, mineral fillers were subjected to the grinding process in classic line planetary ball mill (Fritsch, Idar-Oberstein, Germany). The recipe for the EPM rubber composites is presented in Table 1.
After 24 h, the elastomer mixtures were subjected to rheometric measurements using a moving die rheometer model (Alpha Technologies, New York, NY, USA), according to the ISO 6502 standard. The curing process was performed on an electrically heated hydraulic press at 160 °C with 15 MPa of pressure for a curing time consistent with the vulcanization parameters. As a result, a series of cured ethylene–propylene rubber composites loaded with different quantities of perlite and vermiculite minerals were obtained (Figure 1).
The crosslink density of the EPM vulcanizates was determined based on the equilibrium swelling method, performed in toluene solvent at room temperature. The crosslink density values were calculated from the Flory–Rehner equation [32]:
υe = −[ln(1 − Vr) + Vr + µ∙Vr2]/[V0(Vr(1/3) − (Vr/2)]
where υe is the crosslink density, Vr is the volume fraction of the elastomer in swollen gel, V0 is the molar volume of the solvent [mol/cm3] and µ is the Huggins parameter, determined based on the equation:
µ = μ0 + β·Vr
where the polymer–solvent interaction parameters for the studied system are μ0 = 0.501 and β = 0.273.
The mechanical properties were investigated using a universal strength machine (Zwick, Ulm, Germany) equipped with an extensometer. A tensile test was carried out for five dumbbell-shaped specimens of each composite at a crosshead speed of 500 mm/min, according to the ISO37 standard. The tear resistance of the composites was measured in accordance with the ISO 34-1 standard for three trouser-shaped samples of each composite at a test speed of 50 mm/min. The air permeability of the EPM composites was determined using the manometric method. The gas transmission rate (GTR) was calculated from the equation [33].
GTR = V C R · T · P U · A · d p d t
where VC is the volume of the low-pressure chamber (L), R is the gas constant 8.31 × 103 ((L∙Pa)/(K∙mol)), T is the temperature (K), PU is the pressure of the gas in the high-pressure chamber (Pa), A is the area permeation of the gas through the sample (m2), and dp/dt is the change in pressure over time (Pa/s). The coefficient of gas permeability (P) was then calculated as
P = G T R · d
where d is the thickness of the specimen (m). The morphology of the mineral fillers and composites was observed via scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Images were taken on a LEO 1530 Gemini scanning electron microscope (Zeiss/LEO, Oberkochen, Germany). Prior to the measurements, the vulcanizates were broken in liquid nitrogen. A cone calorimeter (Fire Testing Technology Ltd., East Grinstead, UK) was applied to evaluate the flammability of the EPM composites, according to the PN-ISO 5660 standard. Each squared specimen, of dimensions 100 mm × 100 mm × 2 mm, was irradiated horizontally using a 35 kW/m2 incident heat flux. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was performed using a thermal analyzer (Jupiter STA 449F3, Netzsch Company, Selb, Germany) in a temperatures range of 25–700 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in a nitrogen atmosphere.

3. Results

3.1. Curing Measurements

The primary aim of this research was to investigate the effect of mineral fillers, PT and VMT, on the curing kinetics of EPM rubber. The cure properties were studied at 160 °C for 30 min using a moving die rheometer (MDR). The results of rheometric tests showed that the addition of PT and VMT had a significant influence on the curing behavior of EPM composites. The kinetic parameters of the EPM composites are summarized in Table 2.
First, it can be noted that the application of the mineral fillers caused an increase in the minimum torque moment of the EPM mixtures. The minimum torque value was related to the viscosity of the composites. The enhanced Mmin following the addition of filler could indicate a hydrodynamic effect in the rubber systems filled with the rigid filler particles [34]. Furthermore, because of the relative compatibility between the rubber molecular chains and the mineral, ∆M increases with the increasing loading of PT. The increment of torque during vulcanization is an indirect measurement of the degree of elastomer crosslinking. Hence, it can be concluded that the incorporation of PT will result in the enhancement in the crosslink density of EPM/PT compounds. On the other hand, no significant changes in ∆M were observed for the EPM/VMT blends. For both fillers, a slight reduction in optimum curing time and scorch time was observed, in comparison with the neat EPM. The early start of the crosslinking process, as indicated by the curing times, is evidence of the positive contribution made by the studied minerals to the curing process.
The crosslink density values (see Table 2) corresponded with the variation in torque differences. The crosslink density of the EPM compounds increased in proportion to the content of the mineral fillers, with the maximum reached at 20 phr (5.9 mol/cm3) of PT loading. The only exception was vulcanizate filled with 20 phr of VMT, which showed a lower crosslink density value in comparison to the reference sample. These results suggest that the application of PT or VMT as fillers in EPM rubber may also have substantial impact on their mechanical performance. The results from Table 2 further show that the application of ionic liquids contributed to a slight reduction in the optimum curing time and scorch time of the studied composites. This is in agreement with data in the literature [35], which suggests that ionic liquids may act as catalysts for interface reactions and thereby significantly affect rheometric parameters. In our study, the crosslink density values of the EPM/VMT compounds were found to increase by approximately 2 mol/cm3. There was, however, no clear effect on the IL structure. Furthermore, the EPM/VMT mixtures exhibited an enhanced increment of torque following the incorporation of TFSI-based (bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide) imidazolium ILs, regardless of the cation type. The improvement in the kinetic parameters of the systems with ILs can be also explained by the more homogenous distribution of the additives in the polymer matrix, which led to better contact between the components of the vulcanization system.

3.2. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties (tensile strength and tear resistance) of the EPM-filled composites are presented in Figure 2. Perlite was found to have a low reinforcing effect, as the tensile strength of the EPM/PT systems increased slightly from 3.4 MPa for neat EPM to 4.5 MPa for the composite filled with 20 phr of PT mineral. However, the tear resistance of the EPM/PT composites increased rapidly with increasing contents of PT in the sample. These improvements in the mechanical properties of EPM/PT materials can be explained by their enhanced crosslink density and the relatively uniform dispersion of the PT particles. In the case of EPM/VMT composites, the tensile strength values remained unchanged or slightly decreased in comparison with the reference sample. The opposite results were obtained by Tjong et al. [36], after incorporation of VMT into a polypropylene (PP) matrix. In their study, the modification of VMT with maleic anhydride probably improved its compatibility with the PP matrix. On the other hand, VMT had a very strong impact on the tear resistance of the EPM compounds, which increased considerably from 1.90 N/mm up to 4.56 N/mm for the EPM/20VMT sample. Composites with layered fillers have been also been reported to have high tear resistance in other previous works [37,38]. The various effects of the studied minerals on the mechanical performance of EPM composites can be explained by the differences in the morphological features of the fillers and their compatibility with the EPM matrix. Applying TFSI-based imidazolium salts did not cause marked alterations in their mechanical parameters. The tensile strengths of the samples containing ILs were slightly lower, which is most likely to be related to the plasticizing effect of the studied ILs [39] (Figure 3a). However, the applied ILs may have a positive effect on the tear resistance of the perlite-filled EPM composites. It can be observed that the tear resistance of the EPM/20PT composite increased in both cases following the application of AMIMTFSI and BMIMTFSI, by approximately 42% and 20%, respectively (Figure 3b).

3.3. Barrier Performance

The next objective of this study was to explore the gas permeation characteristics of EPM composites filled with PT and VMT. It is known from the literature [40,41] that many different mineral fillers, such as montmorillonite or saponite, can be employed to improve the barrier performance of various polymeric materials. Therefore, EPM composites filled with increasing contents of PT and VMT were investigated in terms of their gas permeability, using the manometric method. The results are presented in Figure 4.
Figure 4 shows that the incorporation of VMT filler significantly improved the barrier performance of the EPM matrix. This is evidenced by the sharply reduced permeability coefficients of the EPM/VMT composites in relation to the reference. The barrier properties of the EPM systems improved with increasing concentrations of the VMT filler. The most visible improvement was observed for 20 phr of VMT, when the gas permeability coefficient was reduced by approximately 12 × 108 ((mol∙m)/(m∙s∙Pa)) compared to neat EPM. This can be explained by the presence of an impermeable clay mineral layer formed by the plate-like VMT particles or by the restricted motion of rubber chains in the vicinity of the mineral filler particles [42]. Gas molecules must travel around individually deposited VMT platelets or stacks, which significantly extends the diffusion length traveled. Different results were observed for EPM composites containing perlite filler. In this case, the gas permeability coefficient values were similar to the reference, regardless of the filler concentration. The different geometric structures of the fillers (spherical for PT, lamellar for VMT) could have a decisive impact on the barrier properties of the EPM-filled composites. In addition, the effect of studied ILs on the barrier performance of the EPM composites were analyzed. The obtained results revealed that incorporation of 2.5 phr of TFSI-based imidazolium ILs into EPM did not affect the air permeability of the investigated elastomer composites.

3.4. Thermal Stability

The thermal stability of the studied mineral fillers as well as of the EPM composites was evaluated based on thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The TGA curves and corresponding data are presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6 and Table 3.
As shown in Figure 5, the thermal stability of both studied fillers is very high. The char residues registered at 600 °C for perlite and vermiculite were 98% and 96%, respectively. The TGA curve of the vermiculite filler revealed slight weight loss at a temperature of approximately 100 °C, which is typical for this mineral [43] and corresponds to physisorbed water molecules. These results suggest that the studied minerals are resistant to increasing heat in the examined temperature range. Thus, it can be supposed that the incorporation of perlite and/or vermiculite mineral into EPM may affect the thermal properties of the resulting composites, by protecting the elastomer matrix against high temperatures.
From Figure 6, it can be seen that all the EPM composites are stable, up to approximately 250 °C. The weight loss curves indicate that the thermal degradation of the EPM rubber compounds consisted of three loss steps. The first relatively slow mass loss occurred at temperatures between 200 and 400 °C, the second step can be observed in the range of 400–470 °C, the third step was found to be between 470–530 °C. It should be noted that at the beginning of the second step of thermal degradation, the weight of the EPM/20PT and EPM/20VMT samples were 80% and 74%, respectively, while for neat EPM rubber the weight was as much as 55%. The weight loss values determined for these samples suggest that the addition of both PT and VMT to the studied EPM composites clearly limits its rate of thermal decomposition in the temperature range of ΔT = 200–400 °C. However, above 440 °C the thermal decomposition of both the EPM/20PT and EPM/20VMT samples occurs with much more intensity than in the case of unfilled EPM vulcanizate, which means that the studied minerals may negatively affect the efficiency of thermal crosslinking and cyclization. For this reason, the char residue (P600) assumes a higher value for crosslinked EPM rubber in comparison with its filled composites.

3.5. Flammability (Cone Calorimetry)

The cone calorimetry test (CCT) is well-known as an effective bench-scale tool for investigating the flammability of polymer composites. This technique provides data that correlate well with those obtained from full-scale experiments [44]. Therefore, CCT was employed to evaluate the PT and VMT minerals as potential flame retardants for use in EPM rubber composites. The CCT experiments were performed for EPM composites with increasing loading of the fillers. The results are presented in Table 4 and Figure 7.
From the CCT data, it is clear that the flammability parameters were significantly reduced by the incorporation of the studied minerals into the polymer matrix. For instance, in the case of EPM/20PT, the HRRmax parameter was reduced by 67% and the THR parameter by 76% with respect to the reference sample, while in the case of EPM/20VMT they fell by 25% and 42%, respectively. Furthermore, the effective heat of combustion (EHC) parameter also decreased significantly with increasing loading of the fillers, suggesting lower flammability. This decrease in EHC may also be connected with the release of physisorbed water from the minerals during thermal decomposition, as the EHC parameter measured in the CCT experiment corresponds closely to the flame burning condition and thus to the combustion of volatiles from the material [45]. Importantly, the EPM-filled composites containing TFSI-based imidazolium ILs exhibited the sharpest reduction in terms of flammability. This means that the studied thermally-stable ionic liquids improved the flame retardancy of the EPM/PT and EPM/VMT systems.
It has been previously reported that TFSI-based ionic liquid may affect the thermal stability of some rubber composites [46]. Generally, the improvement in the flame retardancy of the EPM composites filled with PT and/or VMT minerals may be explained by the fact that the minerals inhibit the degradation rate of EPM rubber in the initial stage of the thermal degradation process. Moreover, due to the very the high thermal insulation and fire resistance of these minerals they may hinder heat transfer within the composite matrix. On the other hand, after the burning process, the filler particles may form so-called filler islets in the polymer matrix, which do not provide sufficient protection against external heat sources. The fillers cannot therefore be said to have a positive effect on the structure and/or insulating properties of the boundary layer. However, PT and VMT minerals can be considered as inexpensive and natural flame-retardant agents for elastomer composites, which are, above all, effective at relatively low concentrations, as evidenced by the considerably reduced HRR, HRRmax, THR, and EHC parameters (Table 4).

3.6. Morphology

Figure 8a–d shows SEM micrographs of the filler particles and EPM composites containing 10 phr of each filler. Figure 8a depicts the microstructure of the PT raw granules, characterized by fragmented surfaces with irregular small shreds and a highly porous microstructure containing mainly open pores. The VMT granules have different sizes, in the range of a several microns, with a platelet structure. Figure 8c,d shows cross-sections of the EPM/PT and EPM/VMT composites. It appears that both composites consist of a mixture of individual platelets of VMT or PT and some stacks of platelets.

4. Conclusions

This study investigated the effects of two natural minerals, perlite (PT) and vermiculite (VMT), on the properties of ethylene–propylene rubber composites. Three different concentrations of the fillers were used (5, 10 and 20 phr). TFSI-based imidazolium ionic liquids were added to improve filler–polymer compatibility. Comprehensive tests revealed that the studied minerals had a considerable effect on the curing and mechanical properties of the EPM elastomer. The application of PT contributed to improve the torque moment, crosslink density, and tensile strength of the compounds. On the other hand, VMT had a more pronounced impact on the tear resistance and barrier performance of the EPM systems. The varied effects of the studied fillers on the mechanical and barrier properties of the EPM compounds probably resulted from their different structures. It was found that ionic liquids had a catalytic effect on the crosslinking process. Importantly, TGA and CCT analyses revealed that the studied minerals and ionic liquids had a strong effect on the thermal and flame-retardant properties of the EPM compounds, especially in the case of EPM/PT systems. This can be explained by the inhibited rate of degradation in the initial stage and the very high thermal insulation properties of the studied minerals. Therefore, both PT and VMT can be considered for use in the preparation of novel and inexpensive elastomeric materials with improved flame retardancy and gas barrier stability, suitable for important and practical applications in rubber technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing original draft, B.S. and A.M.; investigation and writing original draft P.R.; investigation and writing original draft W.Ż.; supervision, M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hirano, K.; Asami, M. Phenolic resins—100 years of progress and their future. React. Funct. Polym. 2013, 73, 256–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cheong, J.Y.; Ahn, J.; Seo, M.; Nam, Y.S. Flame-retardant, flexible vermiculite–polymer hybrid film. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 61768–61774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, X.; Song, L.; Yang, H.; Lu, H.; Hu, Y. Synergistic effect of graphene on antidripping and fire resistance of intumescent FR poly (butylene succinate) composites. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 5376–5383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wu, Z.; Wang, H.; Tian, X.; Ding, X.; Xue, M.; Zhou, H.; Zheng, K. Mechanical and flame-retardant properties of styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene/carbon nanotube composites containing bisphenol A bis (diphenyl phosphate). Compos. Sci. Technol. 2013, 82, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Janas, D.; Rdest, M.; Koziol, K. Flame-retardant carbon nanotube films. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 411, 177–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Becker, C.M.; Gabbardo, A.D.; Wypych, F.; Amico, S.C. Mechanical and flame retardant properties of epoxy/Mg-Al based LDH composites. Compos. Part A 2011, 42, 196–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Olfs, H.W.; Torres-Dorante, L.O.; Eckelt, R.; Kosslick, H. Comparison of different synthesis routes for Mg-Al layered double hydroxides (LDH): Characterization of the structural phases and anion exchange properties. Appl. Clay Sci. 2009, 43, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tang, Y.; Hu, Y.; Wang, S.; Gui, Z.; Chen, Z.; Fan, W. Intumescent flame retardant–montmorillonite synergism in polypropylene-layered silicate nanocomposites. Polym. Int. 2003, 52, 1396–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Haurie, L.; Fernandez, A.I.; Velasco, J.I.; Chimenos, J.M.; Lopez Cuesta, J.-M.; Espiell, F. Thermal stability and flame retardancy of LDPE/EVA blends filled with synthetic hydromagnesite/aluminium hydroxide/montmorillonite and magnesium hydroxide/aluminium hydroxide/montmorillonite mixtures. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2007, 92, 1082–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Kader, M.A.; Kim, K.; Lee, Y.-S.; Nah, C. Preparation and properties of nitrile rubber/montmorillonite nanocomposites via latex blending. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 7341–7352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Khobragade, P.S.; Hansora, D.P.; Naik, J.B.; Chatterjee, A. Flame retarding performance of elastomeric nanocomposites: A review. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2016, 130, 192–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Talway, K.E. Chitosan phosphate: A new way for production of eco-friendly flame-retardant cotton textiles. J. Text. Inst. 2008, 99, 185–191. [Google Scholar]
  13. Jana, T.; Roy, B.C.; Maiti, S. Biodegradable film: 7. Modification of the biodegradable film for fire retardancy. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2000, 69, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mishra, S.; Sonawane, S.H.; Singh, R.P.; Bendale, A.; Patil, K. Effect of nano-Mg(OH)2 on the mechanical and flame-retarding properties of polypropylene composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2004, 94, 116–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ren, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, J.C. Synergistic effect of vermiculite on the intumescent flame retardance of polypropylene. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010, 120, 1225–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, F.; Gao, Z.; Zheng, M.; Sun, J. Thermal degradation and fire performance of plywood treated with expanded vermiculite. Fire Mater. 2016, 40, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, Y.; Qian, Y.; Lindsay, C.; Nijs, C.; Camargo, R.; Stein, A.; Macosko, C. Polyol-assisted vermiculite dispersion in polyurethane nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 3054–3062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Machado, L.C.R.; Lima, F.W.J.; Paniago, R.; Ardisson, J.D.; Sapag, K.; Lago, R.M. Polymer coated vermiculite–iron composites: Novel floatable magnetic adsorbents for water spilled contaminants. Appl. Clay Sci. 2006, 31, 207–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suvorov, S.A.; Skurikhin, V.V. Vermiculite—A promising material for high-temperature heat insulators. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2003, 44, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Takahashi, S.; Goldberg, H.A.; Feeney, C.A.; Karim, D.P.; Farrell, M.; O’Leary, K.; Paul, D.R. Gas barrier properties of butyl rubber/vermiculite nanocomposite coatings. Polymer 2006, 47, 3083–3093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tjong, S.C.; Meng, Y.Z. Impact-modified polypropylene/vermiculite nanocomposites. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Phys. 2003, 41, 2332–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, S.; Wang, B.; Kang, J.; Chen, J.; Gai, J.; Yang, L.; Cao, Y. Synergistic effect of organic vermiculite on the flame retardancy and thermal stability of intumescent polypropylene composites. J. Macromol. Sci. Part B Phys. 2014, 52, 1212–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Qian, Y.; Lindsay, C.; Macosko, C.; Stein, A. Synthesis and Properties of Vermiculite-Reinforced Polyurethane Nanocomposites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2011, 3, 3709–3717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Papa, E.; Medri, V.; Murri, A.N.; Laghi, L.; De Aloysio, G.; Bandini, S.; Landi, E. Characterization of alkali bonded expanded perlite. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 191, 1139–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Celik, A.G.; Kilic, A.M.; Cakal, G.O. Expanded perlite aggregate characterization for use as a lightweight construction raw material. Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 2013, 49, 689–700. [Google Scholar]
  26. Sahraeian, R.; Hashemi, S.A.; Esfandeh, M.; Ghasemi, I. Preparation of nanocomposites based on LDPE/Perlite: Mechanical and Morphological Studies. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2012, 20, 639–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sahraeian, R.; Esfandeh, M.; Hashemi, S.A. Rheological, thermal and dynamic mechanic studies of LDPE/Perlite nanocomposites. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2013, 21, 243–249. [Google Scholar]
  28. Karaca, E.; Omeroglu, S.; Akcam, O. Investigation of the effects of perlite additive on some comfort and acoustical properties of polyester fabrics. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2016, 133, 43128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marzec, A.; Laskowska, A.; Boiteux, G.; Zaborski, M.; Gain, O.; Serghei, A. Study on weather aging of nitrile rubber composites containing imidazolium ionic liquids. Macromol. Symp. 2014, 342, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Laskowska, A.; Marzec, A.; Boiteux, G.; Zaborski, M.; Gain, O.; Serghei, A. Investigations of nitrile rubber composites containing imidazolium ionic liquids. Macromol. Symp. 2014, 341, 18–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Marzec, A.; Laskowska, A.; Boiteux, G.; Zaborski, M.; Gain, O.; Serghei, A. Properties of carboxylated nitrile rubber/hydrotalcite composites containing imidazolium ionic liquids. Macromol. Symp. 2014, 341, 7–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Flory, P.J. Statistical mechanics of swelling of network structures. J. Chem. Phys. 1950, 18, 108–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Szadkowski, B.; Marzec, A.; Rybiński, P.; Maniukiewicz, W.; Zaborski, M. Aluminum-magnesium hydroxycarbonate/azo dye hybrids as novel multifunctional colorants for elastomer composites. Polymers 2019, 11, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bokobza, L.; Rapoport, O. Reinforcement of natural rubber. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2002, 85, 2301–2316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Pingot, M.; Szadkowski, B.; Zaborski, M. Experimental investigation on activity of cumene hydroperoxide and selected ionic liquids in butadiene rubber vulcanization. Adv. Polym. Technol. 2018, 37, 3432–3437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tjong, S.C.; Meng, Y.Z.; Hay, A.S. Novel preparation and properties of polypropylene−vermiculite Nanocomposites. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Laskowska, A.; Zaborski, M.; Boiteux, G.; Gain, O.; Marzec, A.; Maniukiewicz, W. Ionic elastomers based on carboxylated nitrile rubber (XNBR) and magnesium aluminum layered double hydroxide (hydrotalcite). Express Polym. Lett. 2014, 8, 374–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Gatos, K.; Karger-Kocsis, J. Effect of the aspect ratio of silicate platelets on the mechanical and barrier properties of hydrogenated acrylonitrile butadiene rubber (HNBR)/layered silicate nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2007, 43, 1097–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Subramaniam, K.; Das, A.; Heinrich, G. Development of conducting poly-chloroprene rubber using imidazolium based ionic liquid modified multi-walled carbon nanotubes. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2011, 71, 1441–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Kalendova, A.; Merinska, D.; Gerard, J.F.; Slouf, M. Polymer/clay nanocomposites and their gas barrier properties. Polym. Compos. 2013, 34, 1418–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yano, K.; Usuki, A.; Okada, A.; Kurauchi, T.; Kamigaito, O. Synthesis and properties of polyimide–clay hybrid. J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Chem. 1993, 31, 2493–2498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, Y. Gas barrier properties of natural rubber/kaolin composites prepared by melt blending. Appl. Clay Sci. 2010, 50, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Folorunso, O.; Dodds, C.; Dimitrakis, G.; Kingman, S. Continuous energy efficient exfoliation of vermiculite through microwave heating. Int. J. Miner. Process. 2012, 114–117, 69–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Babrauskas, V.; Grayson, J.S. Heat Release in Fires; Elsevier Applied Science: London, UK, 1992; pp. 61–173. [Google Scholar]
  45. Grexa, O.; Lübke, H. Flammability parameters of wood tested on a cone calorimeter. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2001, 74, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Subramaniam, K.; Das, A.; Steinhauser, D.; Klüppel, M.; Heinrich, G. Effect of ionic liquid on dielectric, mechanical and dynamic mechanical properties of multi-walled carbon nanotubes/polychloroprene rubber composites. Eur. Polym. J. 2011, 47, 2234–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 00585 g001 550
Figure 1. Digital photographs of EPM vulcanizates filled with different contents of perlite and vermiculite.
Figure 1. Digital photographs of EPM vulcanizates filled with different contents of perlite and vermiculite.
Materials 13 00585 g001
Materials 13 00585 g002 550
Figure 2. Mechanical curves of the studied EPM composites: (a) tensile test; (b) tear resistance.
Figure 2. Mechanical curves of the studied EPM composites: (a) tensile test; (b) tear resistance.
Materials 13 00585 g002
Materials 13 00585 g003 550
Figure 3. Mechanical parameters of the EPM composites with 20 phr (parts per hundred parts of rubber) of filler and 2.5 phr of ionic liquids: (a) tensile strength; (b) tear resistance.
Figure 3. Mechanical parameters of the EPM composites with 20 phr (parts per hundred parts of rubber) of filler and 2.5 phr of ionic liquids: (a) tensile strength; (b) tear resistance.
Materials 13 00585 g003
Materials 13 00585 g004 550
Figure 4. Gas permeability coefficient values for EPM composites filled with different contents of perlite and vermiculite.
Figure 4. Gas permeability coefficient values for EPM composites filled with different contents of perlite and vermiculite.
Materials 13 00585 g004
Materials 13 00585 g005 550
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric curves of the perlite and vermiculite minerals.
Figure 5. Thermogravimetric curves of the perlite and vermiculite minerals.
Materials 13 00585 g005
Materials 13 00585 g006 550
Figure 6. Thermogravimetric curves of the unfilled EPM elastomer and EPM composites with 20 phr of perlite and vermiculite fillers.
Figure 6. Thermogravimetric curves of the unfilled EPM elastomer and EPM composites with 20 phr of perlite and vermiculite fillers.
Materials 13 00585 g006
Materials 13 00585 g007 550
Figure 7. Cone calorimetry test results showing flammability parameters of the EPM composites: (a) HRR vs. time and, (b) THR vs. time curves.
Figure 7. Cone calorimetry test results showing flammability parameters of the EPM composites: (a) HRR vs. time and, (b) THR vs. time curves.
Materials 13 00585 g007
Materials 13 00585 g008 550
Figure 8. SEM microphotographs of: (a) perlite; (b) vermiculite; (c) EPM composite filled with 10 phr of perlite; (d) EPM composite filled with 10 phr of vermiculite.
Figure 8. SEM microphotographs of: (a) perlite; (b) vermiculite; (c) EPM composite filled with 10 phr of perlite; (d) EPM composite filled with 10 phr of vermiculite.
Materials 13 00585 g008
Table
Table 1. Composition of EPM-filled mixtures (in phr—parts per hundred parts of rubber).
Table 1. Composition of EPM-filled mixtures (in phr—parts per hundred parts of rubber).
CompoundNeat EPMDCPTTTPerliteVermiculiteAMIMTFSIBMIMTFSI
EPM10010.250000
EPM/5PT10010.255000
EPM/10PT10010.2510000
EPM/20PT10010.2520000
EPM/20PT/AMIMTFSI10010.252002.50
EPM/20PT/BMIMTFSI10010.2520002.5
EPM/5VMT10010.250500
EPM/10VMT10010.2501000
EPM/20VMT10010.2502000
EPM/20VMT/AMIMTFSI10010.250202.50
EPM/20VMT/BMIMTFSI10010.2502002.5
Table
Table 2. Rheometric parameters and crosslink density values of EPM-filled compounds.
Table 2. Rheometric parameters and crosslink density values of EPM-filled compounds.
CompoundMmin (dNm)ΔM (dNm)t02 (min)t90 (min)υe (mol/cm3)
EPM0.814.801.0718.843.4
EPM/5PT0.915.411.0917.294.5
EPM/10PT0.986.081.0317.205.3
EPM/20PT1.147.190.9115.765.9
EPM/20PT/AMIMTFSI0.965.370.8314.165.0
EPM/20PT/BMIMTFSI0.975.420.9015.284.8
EPM/5VMT0.874.831.1614.763.5
EPM/10VMT0.934.861.0313.293.6
EPM/20VMT0.994.451.0612.762.8
EPM/20VMT/AMIMTFSI0.965.901.0111.574.3
EPM/20VMT/BMIMTFSI0.965.621.0211.584.9
Mmin—minimum torque moment, ∆M—increment of torque, t02—scorch time, t90—optimum curing time, υe—crosslink density.
Table
Table 3. Thermogravimetric data for EPM composites.
Table 3. Thermogravimetric data for EPM composites.
CompoundT5
(°C)		T50
(°C)		TRMAX1
(°C)		TRMAX2
(°C)		dm/dt1
(%/min)		dm/dt2
(%/min)		P600
(%)
EPM2984233504424.855.3618.82
EPM/5PT2714003004031.9523.531.17
EPM/10PT2724053054011.3817.36.63
EPM/20PT2784102704071.5034.7612.61
EPM/5VMT2884052923981.3330.3410.42
EPM/10VMT2624042604021.2439.714.18
EPM/20VMT2964102614030.9320.1615.65
T5, 50—temperature of sample 5% and 50% mass loss, TRMAX—temperature for maximum rate of thermal decomposition of tested vulcanizates, P600—residue after thermal decomposition of the composites.
Table
Table 4. Flammability parameters of EPM composites.
Table 4. Flammability parameters of EPM composites.
CompoundTTI
(s)		HRR
(kW/m2)		HRRmax
(kW/m2)		THR
(MJ/m2)		EHC
(MJ/kg)		EHCmax
(MJ/kg)		MLR
(g/m2∙s)
EPM70202.7576.092.951.079.00.206
EPM/5PT68204.1445.957.731.877.50.257
EPM/10PT70195.5390.549.838.179.20.212
EPM/20PT9066.34189.716.610.464.20.224
EPM/20PT/AMIMTFSI12061.23179.317.08.962.10.200
EPM/20PT/BMIMTFSI11063.52170.216.29.360.20.265
EPM/5VMT70185.3560.170.146.672.10.211
EPM/10VMT73171.8529.647.975.878.20.014
EPM/20VMT80177.3435.853.929.877.20.023
EPM/20VMT/AMIMTFSI105145.7401.651.526.974.20.245
EPM/20VMT/BMIMTFSI75120.5380.549.721.369.50.213
TTI—time to ignition; HRR—heat release rate; HRRmax—max heat release rate; THR—total heat release; EHC—effective heat of combustion; EHCmax—max effective heat of combustion; MLR—mass loss rate.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szadkowski, B.; Marzec, A.; Rybiński, P.; Żukowski, W.; Zaborski, M. Characterization of Ethylene–propylene Composites Filled with Perlite and Vermiculite Minerals: Mechanical, Barrier, and Flammability Properties. Materials 2020, 13, 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030585

AMA Style

Szadkowski B, Marzec A, Rybiński P, Żukowski W, Zaborski M. Characterization of Ethylene–propylene Composites Filled with Perlite and Vermiculite Minerals: Mechanical, Barrier, and Flammability Properties. Materials. 2020; 13(3):585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szadkowski, Bolesław, Anna Marzec, Przemysław Rybiński, Witold Żukowski, and Marian Zaborski. 2020. "Characterization of Ethylene–propylene Composites Filled with Perlite and Vermiculite Minerals: Mechanical, Barrier, and Flammability Properties" Materials 13, no. 3: 585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13030585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop