Next Article in Journal
Synthesis, Structural Characterization and Catalytic Evaluation of Anionic Phosphinoferrocene Amidosulfonate Ligands
Next Article in Special Issue
Heterogeneous Catalysis for Environmental Remediation
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Metal Catalysts Bearing Schiff Base Macrocycles for the Ring Opening Polymerization (ROP) of Cyclic Esters
Previous Article in Special Issue
Solar and Visible Light Illumination on Immobilized Nano Zinc Oxide for the Degradation and Mineralization of Orange G in Wastewater
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Catalytic Decomposition of N2O over Cu–Zn/ZnAl2O4 Catalysts

1
Department of Chemical Engineering, Kunming Metallurgy College, Kunming 650033, China
2
Key Laboratory of Green Process and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2017, 7(5), 166; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050166
Submission received: 18 April 2017 / Revised: 12 May 2017 / Accepted: 17 May 2017 / Published: 22 May 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Heterogeneous Catalysis for Environmental Remediation)

Abstract

:
The catalytic decomposition of N2O was investigated over Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts in the temperature range of 400–650 °C Catalytic samples have been prepared by wet impregnation method. Prepared catalysts were characterized using several techniques like BET surface area, X-ray diffraction (XRD), and Scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 showed higher catalytic performance along with long term stability during N2O decomposition. The Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts yielded 100% N2O conversion at 650 °C. The Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts are promising for decrease this strong greenhouse gas in the chemical industry.

1. Introduction

Global warming is focus of intensive concern worldwide. Nitrous oxide (N2O) is an invisible, non-poisonous gas that has been identified as a potential contributor for ozone destruction in the stratosphere over the past decade and recognized as a rather strong greenhouse gas [1]. N2O has a lifetime of 114–130 years under atmospheric conditions, and its global warming potential (GWP) is approximately 310 times higher than that of carbon dioxide (CO2) [2]. Now, the concentration of N2O in the atmosphere is still rising. The emission of N2O comes from both natural sources and human contributions. Natural emissions include terrestrial, marine, and atmospheric sources. The anthropogenic sources include mainly the biological transformation of fertilizer’s nitrogen into N2O (agriculture), biomass burning, combustion of fossil fuels, industrial activities, wastewater treatment, aquaculture and the use of solvents. The continuous increase of N2O concentration in the atmosphere is mainly due to human activities such as adipic acid production, nitric acid production, fuel and biomass combustion, etc. [3,4]. For these reasons, researchers have paid a great deal of attention to N2O because of its possible environmental impacts. There are many methods that can be used to reduce the emission concentration of N2O, such as selective catalytic reduction with hydrocarbons (HC-SCR), thermal decomposition, selective adsorption, and direct catalytic N2O decomposition into N2 and O2 [5]. Among various types of abatement technologies, direct catalytic decomposition is economical and does not produce CO2, and becomes one of the most attracting methods. The catalytic decomposition of N2O (up to 450 °C) provides an attractive solution for reducing N2O emissions in tail gas from chemical processes. It is the most qualified method to reduce N2O emissions because it does not require the addition of reducing agents, and it does not produce harmful by-products.
A large number of catalysts, such as pure oxides, noble metals, mixed oxides, and iron zeolites have been evaluated for N2O decomposition reaction [6,7,8,9,10]. Among them, noble-metal catalysts exhibit satisfactory activity at intermediate temperatures [11,12]. However, their high cost represents an important obstacle towards practical applications. Most zeolite-based catalysts can be largely deactivated in the presence of water vapor and excess oxygen and are very poor in practical applications. Considering lower economic cost and excellent catalytic performance, copper based materials has a great potential for industrial applications. It was reported that Cs-doped CuO, YBa2Cu3O7, Nd2CuO4 and Cu-containing zeolites were active for N2O decomposition [13,14,15,16]. Zinc aluminate (ZnAl2O4) has high mechanical resistance, high thermal stability, or inertness to water vapor, making it an attractive material for the catalyst and a carrier for active metals instead of the more traditional systems. High temperature calcination of Al2O3-supported metal nitrates is a convenient method to form spinel phase [17,18].
In this study, Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts were prepared. Due to the use of cheap materials and simple preparation process, the manufacturing cost of Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts is low. Their activity and stability for decomposition of N2O are tested in the presence of oxygen. The expected results will be beneficial to industrial researchers in studying the catalytic decomposition of N2O.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Effect of Mixed Acid Ratio on N2O Decomposition

Figure 1 shows the effects of the different mixed acid ratio on the activity of Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 in N2O decomposition. It can be found that the use of inorganic and organic mixed acid solution as a solvent had certain effect on improving the catalytic activity of the catalyst. When the ratio of nitric acid to acetic acid was 1:2, the catalyst had a relatively high catalytic activity. Thus, the optimal ratio of nitric acid and acetic acid was 1:2 for preparing Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4.

2.2. Effect of Total Acid and Pseudo-Boehmite Ratio for N2O Decomposition

Figure 2 shows the N2O decomposition performance over the different total acid and pseudo-boehmite ratio catalysts. It was clearly seen that under the same acetic acid and nitric acid ratio, the total acid and pseudo-boehmite ratio had little effect on the catalytic decomposition activity of the catalyst N2O. Taking into account the economic reasons, the ratio of total acid and pseudo-boehmite was 0.06 that seemed appropriate for producing Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4.

2.3. Effect of Cu-Zn Loading Amount on N2O Decomposition

To investigate the effect of Cu-Zn loading amount on N2O decomposition, several Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts with different Cu-Zn loading amount were prepared. Figure 3 shows the catalytic performance results of N2O decomposition over the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 with different Cu-Zn loading amount. As showed in Figure 3 below 450 °C, with the increase of Cu-Zn loading amount, the activity of the catalyst was gradually increased in the range of 30–45 wt %. Above 450 °C, addition of Cu-Zn loading amount increased the catalytic activity and then the activity decreased when Cu-Zn loading amount was increased to 45 wt %. The Cu-Zn loading amount has a more significant effect on catalytic activity above 450 °C. The result may suggest that suitable Cu-Zn loading amount is 35–40 wt %. It was recommended to use amount, which can save raw materials and reduce costs. Hence, this 35 wt % Cu-Zn loading amount was chosen as optimum for N2O decomposition, and further studies were carried out using this Cu-Zn loading amount.

2.4. Characterization of the Catalyst

The XRD patterns of the fresh Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 and used Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts are shown in Figure 4 and Figure 5. Individual phases found in the samples were marked in the graph. The fresh and used catalyst exhibited a crystalline nature with dominating ZnAl2O4 phase. In the XRD pattern of the fresh catalyst, ZnO phase (JCPDS Card No. 36-1451) was observed. The absence of any peaks belonging to the copper phase can be explained by considering the fact that the concentration of CuO particles was low and well dispersed on the surface of the catalyst. In the XRD pattern of the used catalyst, no diffraction peaks of ZnO were observed, most likely reason was the low concentration of ZnO after N2O decomposition reaction.
The BET specific surface area values of the fresh and used catalyst are reported in Table 1. As observed, the mean pore diameter of the used catalysts was lower than that of the fresh catalysts. However, the specific surface area of the used catalysts was larger that of the fresh catalysts. The main cause of this change was that the porosity was developed after catalytic reaction. Furthermore, the surface areas (81.77–94.20 m2·g–1) obtained before and after the catalytic tests were not notably changed, indicating that the catalyst had good structural stability.
Figure 6 shows the surface morphology of the fresh and used catalyst. The fresh catalyst showed rough surface morphology with inhomogeneous small particles. The used catalyst had a low surface roughness, which was possibly due to gas flushing during the catalytic reaction.

2.5. Catalytic Performance

The catalytic activity result for the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts is presented in Figure 7. As shown in Figure 7, no obvious reaction was observed over the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts until about 400 °C, and they started to show some activities above 450 °C. The temperature needs to be over 610 °C in order to reach 90% N2O conversion (T90).
The stability of catalysts is important in determining their practical usefulness. The catalytic stability of the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalyst for N2O decomposition is shown in Figure 8. These tests were carried out at T = 650 °C. In model atmosphere (8.1 vol % N2O, 10.2 vol % O2, N2 balance), N2O conversion over the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalyst after reaction at T = 650 °C for 500 h keeps at 99%, indicating that the catalyst has high activity and stability.

3. Experimental

3.1. Supports Preparation

The supports used in this study were prepared by the kneading method. Pseudo-boehmite powder and SiO2 powder were thoroughly mixed with the inorganic binder, sesbania powder. Next, a mixed solution of nitric acid and acetic acid was added dropwise to the mixture in order to make slurry. The mixture was kneaded to best plastic state, then extruded, calcined at 550 °C for 4 h and shaped.

3.2. Preparation of Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 Catalysts

The supported Cu-Zn catalysts were prepared using an incipient wetness impregnation method. In a typical impregnation process, Zn (NO3)2 6H2O, Cu(NO3)2 3H2O, Ni(NO3)2 6H2O and additives were dissolved in distilled water. The catalyst carrier was wetted with a small amount of water, and then the carrier was impregnated with the same volume in a mixed solution and kept at 60 °C for 24 h. After impregnation, each catalyst was dried in an oven at 100 °C for 10 h. The catalysts were then calcined at 800 °C for 6 h in air to obtain the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts. A photograph of prepared catalyst pellets is given in Figure 9. The catalyst is cylindrical granule with diameter of 5 mm and length of 5–10 mm.

3.3. Catalysts Characterization

BET surface area, pore diameter and pore volume of the catalysts were determined by N2 adsorption at −196 °C using a Micrometrics ASAP 2020 instrument (ASAP2020, Micromeritics, Norcross, GA, USA). XRD patterns of the catalysts were recorded using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD-7000, Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) in with Cu Kα radiation. The 2θ range was kept between 10 and 80 degrees with a scan speed of 6°·min−1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) (Quanta 400F, FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) was used to analyze the surface morphology of the catalyst.

3.4. Activity Tests

The evaluation of catalysts for N2O catalytic decomposition was carried out using a fixed-bed stainless steel reactor with an inner diameter of 58 mm and 850 mm in length. The catalyst bed contained 60 mL of catalyst. The GHSV (gas hourly space velocity) was determined by dividing the standard gas flow rate by the catalyst bed volume. The reactant gas mixture (8.1 vol % N2O, 10.2 vol % O2, N2 balance) was fed to the reactor. The composition simulates high concentration of N2O in the industrial process. The total flow rate was 1200 mL·min−1, which could be converted to a gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) of 1200 h−1. The reaction products were analyzed by using an on-line gas SP-3420 gas chromatograph (GC) equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD).
The N2O conversion was calculated according to the following equation:
X N 2 O ( % ) = ( C N 2 O i n C N 2 O o u t ) C N 2 O i n × 100
where XN2O was the percent conversion of N2O; CN2Oin and CN2Oout were concentrations of N2O (ppm) in the inlet and outlet, respectively.
A long-term stability test was was done at 650 °C and GHSV = 1200 h−1.

4. Conclusions

In this work, Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts was prepared by high temperature calcination of Al2O3-supported metal nitrates and characterized by using XRD, SEM and N2 adsorption-desorption. The Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts were used to reduce N2O emission of simulated sources based on their activity and stability tests. Prepared catalysts were tested for high concentration N2O catalytic decomposition. The results illustrate that Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalyst is quite effective for the catalytic decomposition of N2O under model atmosphere. N2O can be completely decomposed at 650 °C in oxygen atmosphere. No deactivation and good performance of the catalyst were confirmed by 500 h stability tests.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (2013AA030705).

Author Contributions

Xiaoying Zheng and Runhu Zhang conceived and designed the experiments; Xiaoying Zheng performed the experiments; Fang Bai and Runhu Zhang analyzed the data; Chao Hua contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Runhu Zhang wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. WMO Greenhouse Gas Bulletin. 2014. Available online: http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/gaw/ghg/documents/GHG_Bulletin_10_Nov2014_EN.pdf (accessed on 1 January 2016).
  2. Zamudio, M.A.; Bensaid, S.; Fino, D.; Russo, N. Influence of the MgCo2O4 Preparation Method on N2O Catalytic Decomposition. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 2622–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Perez-Ramirez, J.; Kapteijn, F.; Schoffel, K.; Moulijn, J.A. Formation and control of N2O in nitric acid production. Where do we stand today. Appl. Catal. B 2003, 44, 117–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Perez-Ramirez, J. Prospects of N2O emission regulations in the European fertilizer industry. Appl. Catal. B 2007, 18, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kumar, S.; Vinu, A.; Subrt, J.; Bakardjieva, S.; Rayalu, S.; Teraoka, Y.; Labhsetwar, N. Catalytic N2O decomposition on Pr0.8Ba0.2MnO3 type perovskite catalyst for industrial emission control. Catal. Today 2012, 198, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Russo, N.; Fino, D.; Saracco, G.; Specchia, V. N2O catalytic decomposition over various spinel-type oxides. Catal. Today 2007, 119, 228–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Haber, J.; Nattich, M.; Machej, T. Alkali-metal promoted rhodium-on-alumina catalysts for nitrous oxide decomposition. Appl. Catal. B 2008, 77, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shen, Q.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Tian, H.; Hao, Z. A study on N2O catalytic decomposition over Co/MgO catalysts. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 1332–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Abu-Zied, B.M.; Schiwieger, W.; Unger, A. Nitrous oxide decomposition over transition metal exchanged ZSM-5 zeolites prepared by the solid-state ion—Exchange method. Appl. Catal. B 2008, 84, 277–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhou, H.; Hu, P.; Huang, Z.; Qin, F.; Shen, W.; Xu, H. Preparation of NiCe Mixed Oxides for Catalytic Decomposition of N2O. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013, 52, 4504–4509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Konsolakisa, M.; Yentekakisa, I.V.; Pekridisb, G.; Kaklidis, N.; Psarras, A.C.; Marnellosb, G.E. Insights into the role of SO2 and H2O on the surface characteristics and de-N2O efficiency of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts during N2O decomposition in the presence of CH4 and O2 excess. Appl. Catal. B 2013, 138–139, 191–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kapteijn, F.; Rodriquez-Mirasol, J.; Moulijn, J.A. Heterogeneous catalytic decomposition of nitrous oxide. Appl. Catal. B 1996, 9, 25–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pasha, N.; Lingaiah, N.; Redd, P.S.S.; Prasad, P.S.S. Direct Decomposition of N2O over Cesium-doped CuO Catalysts. Catal. Lett. 2009, 127, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gao, L.Z.; Au, C.T. A study on the decomposition of N2O over YBa2Cu3O7. Appl. Catal. B 2001, 30, 35–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, L.Z.; Au, C.T. Studies on the decomposition of N2O over Nd2CuO4, Nd1.6Ba0.4CuO4 and Nd1.8Ce0.2CuO4. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2001, 168, 173–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Smeets, P.J.; Groothaert, M.H.; van Teeffelen, R.M.; Leeman, H.; Hensen, E.J.M.; Schoonheydt, R.A. Direct NO and N2O decomposition and NO-assisted N2O decomposition over Cu-zeolites: Elucidating the influence of the CuCu distance on oxygen migration. J. Catal. 2007, 245, 358–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gorla, C.R.; Mayo, W.E.; Liang, S.; Lu, Y. Structure and interface-controlled growth kinetics of ZnA2O4 formed at the (1120) ZnO/(0112) Al2O3 interface. J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 87, 3736–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Nilsson, M.; Jansson, K.; Jozsa, P.; Pettersson, L.J. Catalytic properties of Pd supported on ZnO/ZnAl2O4/Al2O3 mixtures in dimethyl ether autothermal reforming. Appl. Catal. B 2009, 86, 18–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The catalytic activity for N2O decomposition over the different mixed acid ratio catalysts.
Figure 1. The catalytic activity for N2O decomposition over the different mixed acid ratio catalysts.
Catalysts 07 00166 g001
Figure 2. Effect of the different total acid and pseudo-boehmite ratio on the N2O conversion.
Figure 2. Effect of the different total acid and pseudo-boehmite ratio on the N2O conversion.
Catalysts 07 00166 g002
Figure 3. The effect of Cu-Zn loading amount on the decomposition of N2O.
Figure 3. The effect of Cu-Zn loading amount on the decomposition of N2O.
Catalysts 07 00166 g003
Figure 4. X-ray diffractogram of the fresh catalyst.
Figure 4. X-ray diffractogram of the fresh catalyst.
Catalysts 07 00166 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffractogram of the used catalyst.
Figure 5. X-ray diffractogram of the used catalyst.
Catalysts 07 00166 g005
Figure 6. SEM images of catalysts (A) the fresh catalyst and (B) the used catalyst.
Figure 6. SEM images of catalysts (A) the fresh catalyst and (B) the used catalyst.
Catalysts 07 00166 g006
Figure 7. Conversion of N2O over Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts. Reaction conditions: 8.1 vol % N2O, 10.2 vol % O2, N2 balance, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 1200 h−1.
Figure 7. Conversion of N2O over Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts. Reaction conditions: 8.1 vol % N2O, 10.2 vol % O2, N2 balance, gas hourly space velocity (GHSV) = 1200 h−1.
Catalysts 07 00166 g007
Figure 8. Stability test run of the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts at 650 °C for 500 h.
Figure 8. Stability test run of the Cu-Zn/ZnAl2O4 catalysts at 650 °C for 500 h.
Catalysts 07 00166 g008
Figure 9. A photograph of prepared catalyst pellets.
Figure 9. A photograph of prepared catalyst pellets.
Catalysts 07 00166 g009
Table 1. BET area and pore diameter of the fresh and used catalyst.
Table 1. BET area and pore diameter of the fresh and used catalyst.
CatalystBET Area (m2·g−1)Pore Diameter (nm)
fresh81.7777.0
used94.2075.4

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, X.; Zhang, R.; Bai, F.; Hua, C. Catalytic Decomposition of N2O over Cu–Zn/ZnAl2O4 Catalysts. Catalysts 2017, 7, 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050166

AMA Style

Zheng X, Zhang R, Bai F, Hua C. Catalytic Decomposition of N2O over Cu–Zn/ZnAl2O4 Catalysts. Catalysts. 2017; 7(5):166. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050166

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Xiaoying, Runhu Zhang, Fang Bai, and Chao Hua. 2017. "Catalytic Decomposition of N2O over Cu–Zn/ZnAl2O4 Catalysts" Catalysts 7, no. 5: 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050166

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop