Next Article in Journal
Emissions of a Euro 6b Diesel Passenger Car Retrofitted with a Solid Ammonia Reduction System
Next Article in Special Issue
Validation and Accuracy Assessment of MODIS C6.1 Aerosol Products over the Heavy Aerosol Loading Area
Previous Article in Journal
Creating Truth Data to Quantify the Accuracy of Cloud Forecasts from Numerical Weather Prediction and Climate Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Aerosol Optical Depth and Its Relationship with Urbanization in Shandong Province
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 and Water-Soluble Organic Nitrogen in Yangzhou, China

1
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Environment Monitoring and Pollution Control, Collaborative Innovation Center of Atmospheric Environment and Equipment Technology, School of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
2
College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Jiangsu University of Technology, Changzhou 213001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Atmosphere 2019, 10(4), 178; https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040178
Submission received: 7 March 2019 / Revised: 24 March 2019 / Accepted: 29 March 2019 / Published: 3 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urban Atmospheric Aerosols: Sources, Analysis and Effects)

Abstract

:
Chemical characterization of fine atmospheric particles (PM2.5) is important for effective reduction of air pollution. This work analyzed PM2.5 samples collected in Yangzhou, China, during 2016. Ionic species, organic matter (OM), elemental carbon (EC), and trace metals were determined, and an Aerodyne soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS) was introduced to determine the OM mass, rather than only organic carbon mass. We found that inorganic ionic species was dominant (~52%), organics occupied about 1/4, while trace metals (~1%) and EC (~2.1%) contributed insignificantly to the total PM2.5 mass. Water-soluble OM appeared to link closely with secondary OM, while water-insoluble OM correlated well with primary OM. The PM2.5 concentrations were relatively low during summertime, while its compositions varied little among different months. Seasonal variations of water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) concentrations were not significant, while the mass contributions of WSON to total nitrogen were remarkably high during summer and autumn. WSON was found to associate better with secondary sources based on both correlation analyses and principle component analyses. Analyses of potential source contributions to WSON showed that regional emissions were dominant during autumn and winter, while the ocean became relatively important during spring and summer.

1. Introduction

In recent years, particular matter (PM) pollution has gained wide attention from both government and the public due to its impacts on air quality, human health, and climate change [1,2,3]. In particular, much effort has been devoted to the study of fine particles with an aerodynamic diameter less than 2.5 µm (PM2.5) due to its adverse health effects. Along with rapid economic growth, PM2.5 pollution events (‘haze’) have occurred frequently in China, and many studies have been carried out to elucidate the properties of PM2.5, especially in densely populated regions [4,5,6,7,8,9]. However, the chemical composition of PM2.5 is highly complex, possibly containing a wide variety of components, including inorganic salts (nitrate, sulfate, and ammonium), trace metals, elemental carbon, and a large number of organic species. Moreover, the relative contributions of different components may change significantly under different atmospheric environments [10,11]. Local PM2.5 properties have been shown to be governed by many factors, such as meteorological conditions, emission sources, boundary layer heights, and atmospheric transportation [12,13,14]. Therefore, comprehensive chemical analysis of PM2.5, with a focus on particular geographic locations is necessary and essential for a better understanding of aerosol chemistry and its impacts.
Among various PM2.5 components, the water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) species is an important group of compounds [15,16,17]. The mass fraction of WSON can account for ~10% to 68% of total aerosol nitrogen from continental to oceanic sites, highlighting the importance of organic nitrogen (ON) in atmospheric aerosols [18,19,20,21]. Some certain ON species, for example, amino compounds [22], have been shown to be very important for atmospheric new particle formation [23], secondary organic aerosol formation [24], aerosol hygroscopicity [25,26], and toxicity [27]. However, investigations on ON characteristics in China are scarce [28]. To the best of our knowledge, only one study, conducted in Changzhou [29], has reported on the WSON concentrations in the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region.
In this study, we conducted filter sampling and chemical characterization of the PM2.5 samples collected in urban Yangzhou during 2016. Yangzhou is located in the northern YRD region and is a major city with a population of ~4.6 million and an area of 6634 km2. The city is a few hundred kilometers from Shanghai, and although it is a famous tourist city, it has also suffered recently from serious air pollution. Moreover, as an inland city, its air quality is influenced by multiple sources, including the transportation of air pollutants from nearby regions. However, even with these ongoing issues and concerns, chemical characterizations of the fine particles that are present in Yangzhou are quite scarce. In this paper, we applied a suite of analytical tools to achieve a relatively comprehensive analysis of the PM2.5 components. Our analysis included a study of the following: Organic matter, elemental carbon, inorganic ions, and trace metals. In particular, we determined the mass concentration of the WSON. As part of our discussion, we highlight our analysis of the concentration of the WSON, with a particular focus on its seasonal variations, sources, and potential source areas. Our findings are a valuable contribution to the effort to reduce air pollution in Yangzhou and advance our understanding of aerosol properties in eastern China.

2. Experiments

2.1. Sampling Site and PM2.5 Collection

The sampling site is located in urban Yangzhou (119.40° N, 32.38° E), next to the Yangtze Road (~300 m) and the Slender West Lake (~1 km) (Figure 1). The site is surrounded by residential areas, not directly influenced by industrial emissions. Samples for PM2.5 analyses were collected from 6 April 2016 to 2 November 2016 by using a high volume (flow rate of 1.05 m3 min−1) sampler (Jinshida Ltd., Qingdao, China, model KB-1000) from 9.00 a.m. to 7.00 a.m. of the next day. This timeframe ensured a duration for each sample of 22 h. All particles were collected on 8 × 10-inch quartz fiber filters (Pallflex, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), which were prebaked at 450 °C in a muffle furnace for 4 h. A total of 128 samples were collected (no samples on precipitation days). Note, PM2.5 samples during 13 November 2015–5 April 2016 were analyzed previously [30], and the results of that study were directly used in our study for comparison. For WSON analyses, samples across a whole year (232 samples) were used.
The PM2.5 mass concentrations were determined gravimetrically by using a digital balance (OHAUS DV215CD, precision 0.01 mg) at 45% relative humidity (RH) and room temperature. Two filed blanks were treated in the same way as for the samples. All filters were wrapped in aluminum foil and stored in a freezer at −18 °C until analyzed. Hourly meteorological parameters were also recorded at the same site.

2.2. Chemical Analyses

Ionic species. 1/4 filter was extracted with 100 mL ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm−1) for 45 min ultrasonication in an ice-water bath. The solution was then filtered through a 0.45 μm syringe filter (Spartan, Whatman). An ion chromatograph (IC, Dionex ICS-600 for anions and ICS-1500 for cations) was used to measure the concentrations of water-soluble inorganic ions (WSIIs, including Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg2+, Ca2+, and F, Cl, NO2, NO3, SO42−) in the aqueous extract. The operational details and method detection limits of these ionic species are the same as those described in Ye et al. [29].
Water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) and total nitrogen (WSTN). A quarter of each filter was pre-treated in the same way as for ionic species. Following this, the WSOC concentrations were determined by a TOC-VCPH analyzer (Shimazu, Japan) using a thermo-catalytic oxidation approach. TN contents were determined by the TNM-1 unit of the analyzer. Instrument details and analysis procedures can be found in Ge et al. [31].
Organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC). A round piece with a diameter of 17 mm was cut from each filter and analyzed for total OC and EC contents by the thermal-optical OC/EC analyzer (Sunset Laboratory, Hillsborough, NC, USA) following the IMPROVE TOR protocol described in Chow et al. [32].
Trace elements. To measure the concentrations of trace metals, a MARS6 Xpress CEM corporation Microwave Digestion System was used to digest the PM2.5 samples. About 2 cm2 of each filter was cut into pieces and put into the polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) pressure digestion tank with 1 mL 49% hydrofluoric acid (HF) and 5 mL 69% nitric acid (HNO3). The digest tank processed 8 samples in a batch. A Thermo Fisher X2 Series Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) was then used to determine the concentrations of 14 trace elements, including Al, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Sr, Cd, Ba, and Pb. More details and detection limits of the elements can be found in Qi et al. [33].
Water-soluble organic matter (WSOM). Moreover, we introduced an Aerodyne soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer [34] to obtain the composition of WSOM. Recently, this technique has been used for PM2.5 samples in China [29,30,35,36,37,38]. Briefly, the water extracts were nebulized with argon by using a constant output atomizer (TSI Model 3076) and then dehumidified by a diffusion dryer filled with silica-gel. The dried particles were sent to the soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS) for analysis. This instrument can output 70 ev electron impact ionization mass spectrum, and elemental ratios of the WSOM can be calculated based on the mass spectrum. More operational details can be found in our previous work [29,30].

2.3. Data Analyses

WSOM and water-insoluble OM (WIOM) estimations. The SP-AMS data were processed with the Igor-based ToF-AMS Analysis Toolkit (SQUIRREL v.1.57A and Pika v.1.16A) [39]. CO+ was directly determined as we used pure argon as a carrier gas. Therefore, the CO+ signal was not influenced by the N2+ signal and was easily quantified. For the organic CO2+ signal, since it can be influenced by carbonates [40] and nitrate [41], we set it equal to CO+, similar to Aiken et al. [42]. The signals of H2O+, HO+ and O+ were scaled to CO2+ according to Aiken et al. [42]: H2O+ = 0.225 × CO2+, HO+ = 0.05625 × CO2+, and O+ = 0.009 × CO2+. After determining WSOM mass spectrum, the oxygen-to-carbon (O/C) and hydrogen-to-carbon (H/C) ratios were calculated based on the method of Canagaratna et al. [43], while nitrogen-to-carbon (N/C) ratio was calculated based on Aiken et al. [42]. The organic mass-to-organic carbon (OM/OC) ratio was then calculated. Therefore, in a different approach from the traditional method, which often assumes a fixed OM/OC ratio (for example, 1.6 [44]), we are able to determine the OM/OC ratio for each sample by using the SP-AMS. However, it should be noted that these estimates were still empirical and are subject to uncertainties.
The SP-AMS directly-measured WSOM concentrations were affected by the concentrations of aqueous extracts and flow rates of the carrier gas, etc., Therefore, they cannot represent the original WSOM ambient mass loadings. As a result of this, we used the OM/OC ratios and TOC concentrations to calculate the WSOM concentrations:
WSOM = WSOC × OM/OCWSOM
The WIOM concentrations can be determined by the following equation:
WIOM = (OC − WSOC) × 1.3
The difference between total OC determined by the OC/EC analyzer and the WSOC, is water-insoluble OC (WIOC). The factor of 1.3 is used to convert WIOC to WIOM [45].
Primary (POM) and secondary OM (SOM) estimations. The OC and EC concentrations measured by the OC/EC analyzer can be used to infer the primary and secondary origins of OC by the EC-tracer method [46], as follows:
POC = EC × (OC/EC)pri
SOC = OC − POC
The (OC/EC)pri in Equation (3) refers to the value of primary OC (POC), which is typically the minimum value among all samples (1.92 in this study). The OC/EC ratios can vary among different sources and some primary organic aerosols, such as those from coal combustion and biomass burning may also have large OC/EC ratios. However, the uncertainty of POC and SOC estimations should be small according to Wu and Yu [47]. We can further estimate the POM and SOM concentrations [30]:
POM = POC × 1.2
SOM = (WSOM + WIOM) − POM
WSON estimations. The WSON concentrations can be calculated by the following equation:
WSON = WSTN − WSIN
In this study, concentrations of WSTN came from the TOC analyzer, while the concentrations of water-soluble inorganic nitrogen (WSIN) were the mass concentrations of nitrogen from NH4+, NO3, and NO2 measured by the IC. Negative values (20 out of 232 samples) were not included.
Air mass trajectory and potential source contribution analyses of WSON. 72 h back trajectories of the air masses (at 500 m height) were obtained by using the Hybrid Single-particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) model [48], based on the meteorological data downloaded from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS). The potential source contribution function (PSCF) analysis was performed to explore the air mass origins, and to identify potential source areas of WSON. Details of the PSCF analyses are described in Ge et al. [30].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. General Characteristics of PM2.5 Components

In our previous work [30], we focused on the characteristics of PM2.5 in relatively polluted periods of autumn and winter; while this work presents results of less polluted periods, mainly spring and summer. Therefore, we were able to compare the PM2.5 chemical characteristics between polluted and less polluted periods in a one-year span in Yangzhou. During the sampling period, wind speeds varied from 0.2 m/s to 5.2 m/s with an average of 1.6 m/s. RH had a mean value of 70%, which was on average higher than 62% during autumn–winter [30]. Average temperature was 24.2 °C (0 to 39.9 °C), being much higher than the 9.2 °C during autumn–winter [30]. The higher RH and temperature can influence the aerosol formation and gas-particle partitioning. Therefore, the aerosol properties could be different. Average precipitation was 2.63 mm, more than that during November 2015 to April 2016 [30], and most of the rainfall events occurred in June and July.
Figure 2a shows the time series of each major PM2.5 component, and the reconstructed and weighted PM2.5 mass concentrations. The average PM2.5 concentration was 60.9 (±32.0) μg/m3, ranging from 10.1 to 178.5 μg/m3. This concentration was much lower than the mean value of 104 μg/m−3 during autumn–winter [30]. This result can be expected air pollution during autumn–winter is typically heavy [11] due to unfavorable meteorological conditions and increased primary emissions, such as coal combustion, etc. The summed mass concentrations of all measured components, including OM (=WSOM + WIOM), EC, ionic species and trace metals, were found to be correlated well with the gravimetrically determined PM2.5 concentrations (Pearson’s r = 0.94) (Figure 2b). However, the slope was only 0.80 (±0.02), indicating ~20% PM2.5 mass was unidentified. This unknown fraction may include some unmeasured species, such as crustal materials, carbonate, and particle-bonded water, etc. In particular, organosulfates, recently recognized as a possible important component in PM2.5 [49,50,51], may also contribute to this unknown portion. Sampling loss, analysis artifacts, and measurement uncertainties of various instruments may also add to this unknown portion. A previous similar study [38] also included an unidentified portion, sometimes up to 35.5% (results for PM2.5 during January 2013 in Xi’an, China).
As shown in Figure 3, on average, the WSIIs (=Na+ + NH4+ + K+ + Mg2+ + Ca2+ + F + Cl + NO2 + NO3 + SO42) occupied the largest proportion (51.8%) of PM2.5 mass; OM took up 24.6%, EC occupied 2.1%, and trace metals occupied only ~1%. The structure of PM2.5 composition, and the relative abundances of these components, were similar to those observed during the autumn–winter period [30], revealing the general and consistent behavior of PM2.5 in Yangzhou. Among WSIIs, sulfate was the most abundant component (36.4% of WSIIs), followed by nitrate (27.6%), and ammonium (21.4%). The sum of sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium (SNA) was 85.4% of WSIIs mass, which was similar to 80.6% for the WSIIs during autumn–winter [30]. However, on the contrary, nitrate was more abundant than sulfate during autumn–winter. This result is consistent with previous findings in Changzhou [29] and other cities [52], since ammonium nitrate tends to evaporate into a gas phase at warm temperatures. Chloride fraction (3.2%) was also lower than that of autumn–winter [30], likely due to enhanced primary emissions of chloride, such as coal combustion. In Figure 4, we further presented the monthly averaged PM2.5 chemical compositions during the sampling period. First, it can be seen that the PM2.5 concentrations were low during summer (June–August). The relative contributions of different components varied, especially during June, the mass portion of WSIIs occupied ~70% PM2.5 mass. EC and metal contributions were a bit larger during September and October than in other months. However, the average chemical composition of the most polluted month (April) was almost the same as that of the cleanest month (August), again indicating the consistent PM2.5 characteristics in Yangzhou. It is important to note that daily samples were unable to capture the fast-chemical changes during pollution episodes. These samples are more likely to be representative of the average aerosol properties. Detailed characterization of aerosol properties during specific episodes can be investigated by highly time-resolved measurements, such as online AMS measurements [53,54,55].
Besides SNA, another relatively rich ionic species was calcium, which took up ~8.2% WSIIs mass, followed by minor contributions from Mg2+ (0.3%), K+ (1.0%), and Na+ (1.2%) (Figure 3). Other trace metals together, only occupied ~1% of total PM2.5 mass, which was lower than those reported in Changzhou (2.7% and 5.0%) [29], etc., but similar to that found in Nanjing (1%) [33]. Zn, Al, Pb, and Mn were relatively rich (together 75.4%), and the other 10 elements only occupied ~1/4 mass of the trace elements. It is important to note that during autumn–winter [30], Zn, Al, Pb, and Mn were also the top four abundant trace elements, but the relative contributions were very different, indicating different sources at different seasons for the trace metals in Yangzhou.
By using the OC/EC-tracer based method and the SP-AMS measured results, we can separate OM mass into POM and SOM, as well as WSOM and WIOM. SOM dominated over POM, and WSOM dominated the OM (Figure 3), both were similar to the results during autumn–winter [30]. Tight correlations were observed between WSOM and SOM (r of 0.96 and slope of 0.81) (Figure 5a), and between WIOM and POM (r of 0.80 and slope of 1.37) (Figure 5b). A possible reason for this, is that the process generally involved in the generation of SOM from POM is oxidation, which increases polarity (e.g., generation of carboxylates). The parent compounds (POM) might generally be expected to be non-polar (e.g., polycyclic aromatic compounds and long-chain hydrocarbons) and so would be expected to correlate well with WIOM. This result links POM and SOM with their hygroscopicities, and demonstrates that SOM is likely hygroscopic, while POM is probably hydrophobic. Of course, higher SOM fraction than WSOM fraction (69.1% vs. 57.2%) indicates that a portion of SOM can be water-insoluble.
In ambient air, ammonia is typically the major basic compound to neutralize sulfuric, nitric, and hydrochloric acids. In this work, the equivalent molar ratios of ammonium to the sum of sulfate, nitrate and chloride, was on average 0.95 and the correlation was also good (r of 0.92) (Figure 6a). This result manifests that sulfate, nitrate, and chloride are dominantly bonded with ammonium. The fitted slope of 0.95 (±0.03), less than 1, likely indicates a slight deficiency of ammonium, and suggests a small portion of sulfate, etc., may bond with other cations, such as Ca2+, according to Figure 3.
Considering all measured ionic species, the ionic balance can be calculated by using the molar equivalent ratios of cations (CE) to anions (AE), as follows:
CE = [ Na + ] 23 + [ NH 4 + ] 18 + [ K + ] 39 + [ Ca 2 + ] 40 × 2 + [ Mg 2 + ] 24 × 2
AE = [ SO 4 2 ] 96 × 2 + [ NO 3 ] 62 + [ Cl ] 35.5 + [ F ] 19
It is important to note that NO2 concentration was below the detection limit and was, therefore, not included in Equation (9). The scatter plot between CE and AE is presented in Figure 6b. The correlation was very tight (r of 0.95), and the slope of was 1.06 (±0.03), a bit larger than 1. The result shows that measured cations are able to neutralize all measured anions, and also suggests the possible existence of some other undetected anions (probably carbonate and organic anions).

3.2. Seasonal Properties and Sources of WSON

By using the method provided in Section 2.3, we calculated the WSON concentrations for all samples across a full year. The annual mean WSON concentration was determined to 1.71 (±1.08) µg/m−3. Table 1 compares our results with a number of previous studies conducted in China and a few other locations. It can be seen that, the WSON level in Yangzhou was much higher than those in Japan, Greece, and Florida, USA. It was also higher than ON in PM1 in Beijing, but this was likely due to the fact that ON in supermicronmeter aerosols was not included in that study. This argument is furthered by another study on PM2.5 in Beijing, which showed a much higher WSON concentration. The WSON concentration in Yangzhou was also much lower than those in Xi’an and Guangzhou, but similar to that observed in Changzhou. However, the annual average mass percentage of WSON in WSTN was 18.7%, which is relatively high among the studies listed in Table 1 (except Beijing and Xi’an), indicating an important role of WSON in Yangzhou PM2.5.
We present the seasonal average WSON concentrations in Figure 7a and the corresponding monthly averages in Figure 8a. The average concentrations were 1.87, 1.55, 1.66, and 1.70 µg/m−3 in winter, spring, summer, and autumn, respectively. Winter had a slightly higher WSON concentration than in other seasons, but overall the seasonal or monthly differences of WSON concentrations were not significant except a higher concentration during December and a lower concentration during August. Furthermore, we illustrate the seasonal average nitrogen concentrations in ammonium (NH4+_N) and nitrate (NO3_N) together with WSON in Figure 7b. In all seasons, NH4+_N was the most dominant N-containing species but displayed a decreasing trend from winter to autumn. NO3_N concentration was second to NH4+_N and showed a similar trend with an exception in summer. During summer, WSON concentration was even higher than NO3_N concentration, which is again attributed to the thermodynamic dissociation of NH4NO3 under summertime high temperatures. Overall, different from insignificant seasonal variations of WSON concentrations shown in Figure 7a, the mass contributions of WSON to WSTN were remarkably higher in summer (24.9%) and autumn (24.5%) than in winter (11.4%) and spring (12.6%). Monthly data, as can be seen in Figure 8b, further shows that the average mass percentages of WSON/WSTN were nearly 40% in August and September. This result underscores the importance of WSON in summer and autumn in Yangzhou, despite the total PM2.5 concentrations were relatively low in these two seasons.
To explore the sources of WSON, we first investigated the correlations between WSON and SOM (also POM), as shown in Figure 9. The correlation of WSON with SOM (r of 0.49) was better than it was with POM (r of 0.26), indicating that WSON was more likely associated with secondary formation processes than with primary emissions in Yangzhou. However, the correlation coefficient (0.49) was only moderate, demonstrating that WSON sources were, in fact, complex. Therefore, we further used principle components analyses (PCA) to identify the possible sources of WSON (as well as PM2.5). Twelve variables including OC, EC, WSOC, WSON, and major ionic species of Cl, NO3, SO42−, Na+, NH4+, K+, Mg2+, and Ca2+ were chosen as input parameters.
The PCA resolved four principle factors (or sources) with eigenvalues larger than 1, together accounting for 82.41% of the total variance of original data matrix. The factor profiles, representing the correlation coefficients between the input variables with the factor, are given in Table 2. Component 1 (PC1), which explained 53.1% of the variance, was very likely from biomass and fossil fuel combustions, as it associated closely with K+ (biomass burning marker ion), OC, EC, and Cl (possible species from fossil fuel and or coal combustion). PC2 explained 11.77% of the total variance and the species with high loadings are SNA (SO42−, NO3, NH4+) and WSON. SNA are known to be generated from secondary reactions, therefore PC2 represents the secondary source. The third component (PC3, 9.34% variance) had high loadings of Mg2+ and Ca2+, likely indicating dust origin (from soil and construction activities, etc.). For the fourth component (PC4, 8.21% variance), only Na+ had a high loading (0.97), suggesting a sea salt source. Generally, for WSON, obviously higher loading in the secondary source (PC2) than in other primary sources was observed, strongly indicating that WSON was mainly from a secondary source, consistent with the correlation analysis results in Figure 8. Nevertheless, further molecular characterizations and quantifications of the WSON species and other source markers, combined with source apportionment techniques are still needed to provide more insights into the sources of WSON.
The potential source areas (PSCs) of WSON and clusters of air mass trajectories in four seasons are displayed in Figure 10 and Figure 11, respectively. Five clusters were identified during winter, while other seasons only had three clusters. During winter, the WSON PSCs were mainly distributed within the YRD region (Figure 10a), indicating the dominance of regional emissions. But a few hotspots were also found in Shandong province and, correspondingly, two clusters, one originating from Beijing (42.86% of total trajectories) and one initiated from Mongolia (25.40% of total trajectories), both travelled across Shandong Province. Although the WSON PSCs during winter could trace back far beyond the YRD region and Shandong province, other areas contributed relatively insignificantly (correspondingly clusters 2, 4, and 5 together occupied ~30% of all trajectories in Figure 11a). No obvious source from the ocean was found during winter.
For spring, the WSON PSCs mainly distributed in the YRD region and Jiangxi province, rather than in Shandong Province (Figure 10b). Interestingly, there was a potentially large source in the Yellow sea close to Korea, and consistently a relatively short cluster starting from Bohai sea, crossing over Shandong Peninsula and the Yellow Sea, occupied the majority of air mass (62.75%) (Figure 11b).
The WSON PSCs during summer concentrated mainly in Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces. There were also some WSON likely from the ocean, including the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea (Figure 10c). The trajectories during summer were also unique: It had one cluster (41.3%), which originated from the east Pacific Ocean, and another one (19.57%) crossed over Bohai Sea and Yellow Sea. There was only one inland cluster (41.3%), which started from Guangdong Province (Figure 11c).
During autumn, the WSON PSCs were predominantly located in Jiangsu Province and Shanghai, with less contributions from Shandong Province and the Yellow Sea. Consistently, a short cluster across the Yellow Sea, Shanghai, and Jiangsu Province, was the major one (55.88%). The area of WSON potential sources during autumn appeared to be the smallest among all seasons.

4. Conclusions

In this work, we analyzed the chemical compostions of PM2.5 samples collected in urban Yangzhou, China during spring and summer of 2016. Ionic species, OM, EC, and trace metals, on average. occupied ~80% of total PM2.5 mass. Mass contribution of ionic species (~52%) was twice that of the OM (~25%), while EC and trace metals together contributed little (~3%). Sulfate, nitrate, and ammonium dominated the ionic species. The Aerodyne SP-AMS was used to determine the mass spectra of WSOM, and derived the OM/OC ratio, and was therefore the WSOM and WIOM mass concentrations. An EC-tracer based method was used to estimate SOM and POM mass concentrations. Correlation analyses showed that SOM linked closely with WSOM, while POM correlated well with WIOM. In particular, this work measured the WSON concentrations in one year-long PM2.5 samples. Different from the monthly variations of PM2.5 concentrations, WSON concentrations had no significant seasonal and monthly differences. However, seasonal and monthly differences of mass contributions of WSON to total nitrogen were significant, which were much higher in summer and autumn than in winter and spring. Temporal variation of WSON concentrations was found to correlate better with that of SOM than with POM, indicating secondary formation is important for the WSON in Yangzhou, which was also supported by the PCA results. PSCF analyses of WSON demonstrated that regional sources were dominant during autumn and winter, while oceans became relatively important for the WSON during spring and summer.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.G. and M.C.; methodology, Y.C. (Yuntao Chen), Y.C. (Yanfang Chen), X.X., Q.L. and Z.Y.; sample collection and chemical analysis: Y.C. (Yuntao Chen), Y.C. (Yanfang Chen), X.X., Q.L. and Z.Y.; data analysis and discussion: Y.C. (Yuntao Chen), Y.C. (Yanfang Chen) and X.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.C. (Yuntao Chen); writing—review and editing, X.G. and M.C.; supervision, X.G.; project administration, X.G. and M.C.; funding acquisition, X.G.

Funding

This research was funded by the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), grant number 21577065 and 21777073, and the Jiangsu Natural Science Foundation, grant number BK20181476.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Environmental Monitoring Center of Yangzhou for the technical assistance provided for this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Heal, M.R.; Kumar, P.; Harrison, R.M. Particles, air quality, policy and health. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 6606–6630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Nel, A. Air pollution-related illness: Effects of particles. Science 2005, 308, 804–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Cao, J.J.; Xu, H.M.; Xu, Q.; Chen, B.H.; Kan, H.D. Fine particulate matter constituents and cardiopulmonary mortality in a heavily polluted chinese city. Environ. Health Persp. 2012, 120, 373–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Chan, C.K.; Yao, X. Air pollution in mega cities in china. Atmos. Environ. 2008, 42, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Liang, C.; Duan, F.; He, K.; Ma, Y. Review on recent progress in observations, source identifications and countermeasures of pm2.5. Environ. Int. 2016, 86, 150–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, X.; Nie, D.; Zhang, K.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Shi, Z.; Wang, Y.; Huang, L.; Chen, M.; Ge, X.; et al. Evaluation of particulate matter deposition in the human respiratory tract during winter in nanjing using size and chemically resolved ambient measurements. Air Qual. Atmos. Health 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Nie, D.; Chen, M.; Wu, Y.; Ge, X.; Hu, J.; Zhang, K.; Ge, P. Characterization of fine particulate matter and associated health burden in nanjing. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sun, Y.; Du, W.; Fu, P.; Wang, Q.; Li, J.; Ge, X.; Zhang, Q.; Zhu, C.; Ren, L.; Xu, W.; et al. Primary and secondary aerosols in beijing in winter: Sources, variations and processes. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 8309–8329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, Y.; Xie, S.-D.; Luo, B.; Zhai, C. Characteristics and sources of water-soluble ions in pm2.5 in the sichuan basin, china. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Saxena, P.; Hildemann, L.M. Water-soluble organics in atmospheric particles: A critical review of the literature and application of thermodynamics to identify candidate compounds. J. Atmos. Chem. 1996, 24, 57–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wang, Y.; Ying, Q.; Hu, J.; Zhang, H. Spatial and temporal variations of six criteria air pollutants in 31 provincial capital cities in china during 2013–2014. Environ. Int. 2014, 73, 413–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Shen, F.; Ge, X.; Hu, J.; Nie, D.; Tian, L.; Chen, M. Air pollution characteristics and health risks in henan province, china. Environ. Res. 2017, 156, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Zhu, Y.; Huang, L.; Li, J.; Ying, Q.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Liao, H.; Li, N.; Liu, Z.; Mao, Y.; et al. Sources of particulate matter in china: Insights from source apportionment studies published in 1987–2017. Environ. Int. 2018, 115, 343–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, R.; Wang, G.; Guo, S.; Zamora, M.L.; Ying, Q.; Lin, Y.; Wang, W.; Hu, M.; Wang, Y. Formation of urban fine particulate matter. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 3803–3855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Cape, J.N.; Cornell, S.E.; Jickells, T.D.; Nemitz, E. Organic nitrogen in the atmosphere—Where does it come from? A review of sources and methods. Atmos. Res. 2011, 102, 30–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Yu, X.; Yu, Q.; Zhu, M.; Tang, M.; Li, S.; Yang, W.; Zhang, Y.; Deng, W.; Li, G.; Yu, Y.; et al. Water soluble organic nitrogen (wson) in ambient fine particles over a megacity in south china: Spatiotemporal variations and source apportionment. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2017, 122, 13,045–13,060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Violaki, K.; Mihalopoulos, N. Water-soluble organic nitrogen (wson) in size-segregated atmospheric particles over the eastern mediterranean. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 4339–4345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, Q.; Anastasio, C.; Jimenez-Cruz, M. Water-soluble organic nitrogen in atmospheric fine particles (pm2.5) from northern california. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2002, 107, 4112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mace, K.A.; Duce, R.A.; Tindale, N.W. Organic nitrogen in rain and aerosol at cape grim, tasmania, australia. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 2003, 108, 4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rastogi, N.; Zhang, X.; Edgerton, E.S.; Ingall, E.; Weber, R.J. Filterable water-soluble organic nitrogen in fine particles over the southeastern USA during summer. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 6040–6047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ho, K.F.; Ho, S.S.H.; Huang, R.J.; Liu, S.X.; Cao, J.J.; Zhang, T.; Chuang, H.C.; Chan, C.S.; Hu, D.; Tian, L. Characteristics of water-soluble organic nitrogen in fine particulate matter in the continental area of china. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 106, 252–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ge, X.; Wexler, A.S.; Clegg, S.L. Atmospheric amines—Part i. A review. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 524–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Almeida, J.; Schobesberger, S.; Kurten, A.; Ortega, I.K.; Kupiainen-Maatta, O.; Praplan, A.P.; Adamov, A.; Amorim, A.; Bianchi, F.; Breitenlechner, M.; et al. Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid-amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere. Nature 2013, 502, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Qiu, C.; Zhang, R. Multiphase chemistry of atmospheric amines. Phys.Chem. Chem. Phys. 2013, 15, 5738–5752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ge, X.; Wexler, A.S.; Clegg, S.L. Atmospheric amines—Part ii. Thermodynamic properties and gas/particle partitioning. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45, 561–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fan, X.; Dawson, J.; Chen, M.; Qiu, C.; Khalizov, A. Thermal stability of particle-phase monoethanolamine salts. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2018, 52, 2409–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Lee, D.; Wexler, A.S. Atmospheric amines—Part iii: Photochemistry and toxicity. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 71, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Xu, W.; Sun, Y.; Wang, Q.; Du, W.; Zhao, J.; Ge, X.; Han, T.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Li, J.; et al. Seasonal characterization of organic nitrogen in atmospheric aerosols using high resolution aerosol mass spectrometry in beijing, china. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2017, 1, 673–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ye, Z.; Liu, J.; Gu, A.; Feng, F.; Liu, Y.; Bi, C.; Xu, J.; Li, L.; Chen, H.; Chen, Y.; et al. Chemical characterization of fine particular matter in changzhou, china and source apportionment with offline aerosol mass spectrometry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 2017, 2573–2592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ge, X.; Li, L.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Wu, D.; Wang, J.; Xie, X.; Ge, S.; Ye, Z.; Xu, J.; et al. Aerosol characteristics and sources in yangzhou, china resolved by offline aerosol mass spectrometry and other techniques. Environ. Pollut. 2017, 225, 74–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ge, X.; Shaw, S.L.; Zhang, Q. Toward understanding amines and their degradation products from postcombustion CO2 capture processes with aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 5066–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chow, J.C.; Watson, J.G.; Chen, L.W.A.; Chang, M.C.O.; Robinson, N.F.; Trimble, D.; Kohl, S. The improve_a temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: Maintaining consistency with a long-term database. J. Air Waste Manag. 2007, 57, 1014–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Qi, L.; Chen, M.; Ge, X.; Zhang, Y.; Guo, B. Seasonal variations and sources of 17 aerosol metal elements in suburban nanjing, china. Atmosphere 2016, 7, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Onasch, T.B.; Trimborn, A.; Fortner, E.C.; Jayne, J.T.; Kok, G.L.; Williams, L.R.; Davidovits, P.; Worsnop, D.R. Soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer: Development, validation, and initial application. Aerosol. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46, 804–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Z.; Yu, G.; Ge, X.; Qin, X. Chemical composition and size distribution of summertime pm2.5 at a high altitude remote location in the northeast of the qinghai–xizang (tibet) plateau: Insights into aerosol sources and processing in free troposphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 5069–5081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qiu, Y.; Xie, Q.; Wang, J.; Xu, W.; Li, L.; Wang, Q.; Zhao, J.; Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Wu, Y.; et al. Vertical characterization and source apportionment of water-soluble organic aerosol with high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry in beijing, china. ACS Earth Space Chem. 2019, 3, 273–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ye, Z.; Li, Q.; Liu, J.; Luo, S.; Zhou, Q.; Bi, C.; Ma, S.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Li, L.; et al. Investigation of submicron aerosol characteristics in changzhou, china: Composition, source, and comparison with co-collected pm2.5. Chemosphere 2017, 183, 176–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Huang, R.-J.; Zhang, Y.; Bozzetti, C.; Ho, K.-F.; Cao, J.-J.; Han, Y.; Daellenbach, K.R.; Slowik, J.G.; Platt, S.M.; Canonaco, F.; et al. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in china. Nature 2014, 514, 218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Tof-ams Software. (Written in Igor Pro 6.37—Wavemetrics, Portland, OR, USA). Available online: http://cires1.Colorado.Edu/jimenez-group/tofamsresources/tofsoftware/index.Html (accessed on 9 January 2019).
  40. Bozzetti, C.; El Haddad, I.; Salameh, D.; Daellenbach, K.R.; Fermo, P.; Gonzalez, R.; Minguillón, M.C.; Iinuma, Y.; Poulain, L.; Elser, M.; et al. Organic aerosol source apportionment by offline-ams over a full year in marseille. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2017, 17, 8247–8268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pieber, S.M.; El Haddad, I.; Slowik, J.G.; Canagaratna, M.R.; Jayne, J.T.; Platt, S.M.; Bozzetti, C.; Daellenbach, K.R.; Fröhlich, R.; Vlachou, A.; et al. Inorganic salt interference on CO2+ in aerodyne ams and acsm organic aerosol composition studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2016, 50, 10494–10503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aiken, A.C.; Decarlo, P.F.; Kroll, J.H.; Worsnop, D.R.; Huffman, J.A.; Docherty, K.S.; Ulbrich, I.M.; Mohr, C.; Kimmel, J.R.; Sueper, D.; et al. O/c and om/oc ratios of primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 4478–4485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Canagaratna, M.R.; Jimenez, J.L.; Kroll, J.H.; Chen, Q.; Kessler, S.H.; Massoli, P.; Hildebrandt Ruiz, L.; Fortner, E.; Williams, L.R.; Wilson, K.R.; et al. Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: Characterization, improved calibration, and implications. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2015, 15, 253–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Ye, Z.; Li, Q.; Ma, S.; Zhou, Q.; Gu, Y.; Su, Y.; Chen, Y.; Chen, H.; Wang, J.; Ge, X. Summertime day-night differences of pm2.5 components (inorganic ions, oc, ec, wsoc, wson, hulis, and pahs) in changzhou, china. Atmosphere 2017, 8, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sun, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Zheng, M.; Ding, X.; Edgerton, E.S.; Wang, X. Characterization and source apportionment of water-soluble organic matter in atmospheric fine particles (pm2.5) with high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry and gc–ms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 4854–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Turpin, B.J.; Huntzicker, J.J. Identification of secondary organic aerosol episodes and quantitation of primary and secondary organic aerosol concentrations during scaqs. Atmos. Environ. 1995, 29, 3527–3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wu, C.; Yu, J.Z. Determination of primary combustion source organic carbon-to-elemental carbon (oc/ec) ratio using ambient oc and ec measurements: Secondary oc-ec correlation minimization method. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 5453–5465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Draxler, R.; Stunder, B.; Rolph, G.; Stein, A.; Taylor, A. Hysplit4 User’s Guide; Version 4; Report; Noaa: Silver Spring, MD, USA, 2012.
  49. Tao, S.; Lu, X.; Levac, N.; Bateman, A.P.; Nguyen, T.B.; Bones, D.L.; Nizkorodov, S.A.; Laskin, J.; Laskin, A.; Yang, X. Molecular characterization of organosulfates in organic aerosols from shanghai and los angeles urban areas by nanospray-desorption electrospray ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 10993–11001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Riva, M.; Tomaz, S.; Cui, T.; Lin, Y.-H.; Perraudin, E.; Gold, A.; Stone, E.A.; Villenave, E.; Surratt, J.D. Evidence for an unrecognized secondary anthropogenic source of organosulfates and sulfonates: Gas-phase oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of sulfate aerosol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 6654–6664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Shakya, K.M.; Peltier, R.E. Non-sulfate sulfur in fine aerosols across the united states: Insight for organosulfate prevalence. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 100, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ge, X.; He, Y.; Sun, Y.; Xu, J.; Wang, J.; Shen, Y.; Chen, M. Characteristics and formation mechanisms of fine particulate nitrate in typical urban areas in china. Atmosphere 2017, 8, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wang, J.; Ge, X.; Chen, Y.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Sun, Y.; Xu, J.; Ge, S.; Yu, H.; Chen, M. Highly time-resolved urban aerosol characteristics during springtime in yangtze river delta, china: Insights from soot particle aerosol mass spectrometry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 9109–9127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Xu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, M.; Ge, X.; Ren, J.; Qin, D. Chemical composition, sources, and processes of urban aerosols during summertime in northwest china: Insights from high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 12593–12611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Xu, J.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, J.; Ge, X.; Xie, C.; Wang, J.; Kang, S.; Zhang, R.; Wang, Y. Chemical characteristics of submicron particles at the central tibetan plateau: Insights from aerosol mass spectrometry. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2018, 18, 427–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Duan, F.; Liu, X.; He, K.; Dong, S. Measurements and characteristics of nitrogen-containing compounds in atmospheric particulate matter in beijing, china. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 82, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Luo, L.; Yao, X.H.; Gao, H.W.; Hsu, S.C.; Li, J.W.; Kao, S.J. Nitrogen speciation in various types of aerosols in spring over the northwestern pacific ocean. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 325–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Matsumoto, K.; Yamamoto, Y.; Nishizawa, K.; Kaneyasu, N.; Irino, T.; Yoshikawa-Inoue, H. Origin of the water-soluble organic nitrogen in the maritime aerosol. Atmos. Environ. 2017, 167, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Matsumoto, K.; Takusagawa, F.; Suzuki, H.; Horiuchi, K. Water-soluble organic nitrogen in the aerosols and rainwater at an urban site in japan: Implications for the nitrogen composition in the atmospheric deposition. Atmos. Environ. 2018, 191, 267–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Calderón, S.M.; Poor, N.D.; Campbell, S.W. Estimation of the particle and gas scavenging contributions to wet deposition of organic nitrogen. Atmos. Environ. 2007, 41, 4281–4290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sampling site and its surrounding areas.
Figure 1. Sampling site and its surrounding areas.
Atmosphere 10 00178 g001
Figure 2. (a) Time series of total particular matter (PM2.5) and major components, and (b) scatter plot of the reconstructed versus measured PM2.5 mass concentrations (colored by time).
Figure 2. (a) Time series of total particular matter (PM2.5) and major components, and (b) scatter plot of the reconstructed versus measured PM2.5 mass concentrations (colored by time).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g002
Figure 3. Average chemical compositions of total PM2.5, organic matter, ionic species, and trace metals (2016.4.6~2016.11.2).
Figure 3. Average chemical compositions of total PM2.5, organic matter, ionic species, and trace metals (2016.4.6~2016.11.2).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g003
Figure 4. Monthly averaged chemical compositions and mass concentrations of PM2.5 (a), and mass contributions of different components to PM2.5 (b).
Figure 4. Monthly averaged chemical compositions and mass concentrations of PM2.5 (a), and mass contributions of different components to PM2.5 (b).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g004
Figure 5. Scatter plots of water-soluble organic matter (WSOM) versus secondary OM (SOM) (a), and water-insoluble OM (WIOM) versus primary OM (POM) (b) (colored by time).
Figure 5. Scatter plots of water-soluble organic matter (WSOM) versus secondary OM (SOM) (a), and water-insoluble OM (WIOM) versus primary OM (POM) (b) (colored by time).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g005
Figure 6. Scatter plots of molar ratios of ammonium versus sum of sulfate, nitrate, and chloride (a), and cations versus anions (b) (colored by time).
Figure 6. Scatter plots of molar ratios of ammonium versus sum of sulfate, nitrate, and chloride (a), and cations versus anions (b) (colored by time).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g006
Figure 7. Seasonal average concentrations of WSON (a), and average concentrations of WSON, nitrogen in ammonium (NH4+_N) and nitrate (NO3_N), and WSON/water-soluble total nitrogen (WSTN) (%) (b).
Figure 7. Seasonal average concentrations of WSON (a), and average concentrations of WSON, nitrogen in ammonium (NH4+_N) and nitrate (NO3_N), and WSON/water-soluble total nitrogen (WSTN) (%) (b).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g007
Figure 8. Monthly average concentrations of WSON (a), and WSON/WSTN (%) (b).
Figure 8. Monthly average concentrations of WSON (a), and WSON/WSTN (%) (b).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g008
Figure 9. Scatter plots of WSON versus POM (a), and WSON versus SOM (b) (colored by time).
Figure 9. Scatter plots of WSON versus POM (a), and WSON versus SOM (b) (colored by time).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g009
Figure 10. The potential source contributions to WSON during (a) winter, (b) spring, (c) summer, and (d) autumn (colored by the potential source contribution function (PSCF) values).
Figure 10. The potential source contributions to WSON during (a) winter, (b) spring, (c) summer, and (d) autumn (colored by the potential source contribution function (PSCF) values).
Atmosphere 10 00178 g010
Figure 11. Clusters of the 72-h back trajectories during (a) winter, (b) spring, (c) summer, and (d) autumn.
Figure 11. Clusters of the 72-h back trajectories during (a) winter, (b) spring, (c) summer, and (d) autumn.
Atmosphere 10 00178 g011
Table 1. Mass concentrations of water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) measured in different sites.
Table 1. Mass concentrations of water-soluble organic nitrogen (WSON) measured in different sites.
LocationSamplesPeriodWSON (µg/m3)WSON/WSTN (%)Ref.
Beijing, ChinaPM2.51998.11–1999.23.1730[56]
Xi’an, ChinaPM2.52008–20094.2045[21]
Guangzhou, ChinaPM2.520144.7812.2[16]
Changzhou, ChinaPM2.52015.7–2016.41.167.7[29]
Beijing, China *PM12013.12.16–2014.12.150.26~0.597-10[28]
East China SeasTSP (Sea fog)2014.3.17–2014.4.222.06 ± 2.3910 ± 6[57]
Rishiri Island, JapanPM102010.4.16–2012.11.80.07713[58]
Kofu, JapanPM102016.4.16–2016.10.130.07110[59]
Crete, GreecePM1.32005.1–2003.120.83 ± 1.013[17]
Florida, USAPM2.52005.7–2005.90.36 ± 0.218.9 ± 5.8[60]
Yangzhou, ChinaPM2.52015.11.12–2016.11.21.71 ± 1.0818.7This work
* Online measurement of ON in PM1. It may include both water-soluble and water-insoluble ON.
Table 2. Principle components analyses (PCA) analysis results of PM2.5 and WSON (numbers in bold highlight the components with significances).
Table 2. Principle components analyses (PCA) analysis results of PM2.5 and WSON (numbers in bold highlight the components with significances).
ComponentsPC1PC2PC3PC4
EC0.940.020.110.09
OC0.790.360.21−0.02
Cl0.880.030.100.12
NO30.790.50−0.03−0.11
SO42−0.420.780.02−0.07
NH4+0.790.51−0.07−0.04
Ca2+0.29−0.020.740.17
Mg2+−0.030.060.90−0.18
Na+0.040.06−0.030.97
K+0.930.150.140.03
WSOC0.820.420.11−0.01
WSON0.090.790.030.13
Initial Eigenvalue6.371.411.121.00
Variance Explained53.1011.779.348.21
Cumulative Variance Explained53.1064.8674.2082.41

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Y.; Chen, Y.; Xie, X.; Ye, Z.; Li, Q.; Ge, X.; Chen, M. Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 and Water-Soluble Organic Nitrogen in Yangzhou, China. Atmosphere 2019, 10, 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040178

AMA Style

Chen Y, Chen Y, Xie X, Ye Z, Li Q, Ge X, Chen M. Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 and Water-Soluble Organic Nitrogen in Yangzhou, China. Atmosphere. 2019; 10(4):178. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040178

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Yuntao, Yanfang Chen, Xinchun Xie, Zhaolian Ye, Qing Li, Xinlei Ge, and Mindong Chen. 2019. "Chemical Characteristics of PM2.5 and Water-Soluble Organic Nitrogen in Yangzhou, China" Atmosphere 10, no. 4: 178. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10040178

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop