Next Article in Journal
Genetic Variability and Interrelationships of Grain, Cooking, and Nutritional Quality Traits in Cowpea: Implications for Cowpea Improvement
Previous Article in Journal
Assessing the Sustainability of Urban Agriculture in Shanghai’s Nine Agriculture Districts: A Decadal Analysis (2010–2020)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Flaxseed Dehulling Technology in China

by
Leilei Chang
1,
Ruijie Shi
1,
Fei Dai
2,
Wuyun Zhao
1,*,
Yiming Zhao
1 and
Junzhi Chen
1
1
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Aridland Crop Science, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Agriculture 2024, 14(4), 632; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040632
Submission received: 23 March 2024 / Revised: 8 April 2024 / Accepted: 11 April 2024 / Published: 19 April 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Technology)

Abstract

:
With the improvement in living standards and growing appreciation for flaxseed’s nutritional value, global demand for flaxseed and its economic significance are continuously increasing. As a major flaxseed producer and exporter, China plays a crucial role in the development of its agricultural economy. Flaxseed, one of China’s five key oil crops, is renowned for its rich nutritional content. This study employed a literature review to systematically examine the research status of key flaxseed dehulling technologies in China. It explored the characteristics, efficiencies, and quality differences among various dehulling methods, while also drawing on advanced techniques, such as chemical and ultrasonic dehulling, to provide new perspectives and theoretical support for flaxseed dehulling. Comprehensive analysis revealed that mechanical dehulling (the impact method and rolling and rubbing method) is the primary method used in China. The study also identified the issues in current flaxseed dehulling research in China and offers suggestions to guide future improvements and innovations in flaxseed processing, aiming to enhance the quality and nutritional value of flaxseed to meet diverse market demands.

1. Introduction

Flax is a category within the Linaceae family, taxonomically divided into five genera: Linum, Dasylinum, Syllinum, Linastrum, and Cathartolinum. Flaxseed is the seed of the flax plant (Linum usitatissimum L.) belonging to the Linaceae family. Flax is mainly divided into oil flax, fiber flax, and dual-use flax (oil and fiber) categories, with resistance to barrenness, cold, and drought, high value, and other characteristics [1]. It is mainly produced in the United States, Canada, India, and China [2,3]. In recent years, China’s flax sowing area has expanded, with an average annual sowing area of about 3.23 × 109 m2, and an average annual total output of about 3.6 × 105 t, second only to that of Canada and India. Gansu Province is one of the main areas producing of flax in China, where the sowing area ranks first among the seven major flax-producing areas [4]. Its average annual sowing area is about 9.7 × 108 hm2 and average annual total output is about 1.51 × 105 t, accounting for 30.5% of the national sowing area and for 38.67% of the country’s total output, respectively; the province’s sowing area and production rank first in the country [5,6,7].
Flaxseed is one of the important oil crops in Northwest China and North China, and the residual meal after oil extraction can be used as a protein source in animal and poultry feed [8,9,10,11]. Flaxseed is also utilized in food processing and can be used as medicine [12]. In recent years, the industrial applications of flaxseed gum and flax fiber have also been increasing [13,14,15,16,17,18]. To achieve better processing and utilization of flaxseed, expand its applications in food processing, and improve the quality and nutritional value of flaxseed [19] to meet diverse market needs, dehulling treatment of flaxseed has gradually become a research hotspot.
Currently, flaxseed dehulling in China is primarily via mechanical methods, such as the impact method and rolling and rubbing methods. While these approaches have yielded certain outcomes, numerous deficiencies persist. Most notably, the single-pass dehulling rate remains relatively low, necessitating multiple cycles. Moreover, there is limited incorporation of efficient and environmentally friendly emerging dehulling technologies, such as chemical and ultrasonic dehulling methods. Consequently, this study conducted an in-depth analysis of the prevailing key dehulling technologies and the current state of the flaxseed dehulling process in China. The aim was to provide novel insights and innovative perspectives for advancing flaxseed dehulling techniques in China, thereby offering valuable theoretical support and a reference for future research and development endeavors in this field.

2. Intrinsic Properties of Flaxseed and Significance of Dehulling

Flaxseed, known as the “golden seed”, is generally flat and oval, with a hard, thick, and smooth outer skin, and a relatively large proportion of kernel to husk [20]. It is widely used in food processing and plays a crucial role in medicine, health products, and feed additives [21]. Studies show the primary nutrients of flaxseed are concentrated in the kernel, which is abundant in unsaturated fatty acids, high-quality plant proteins, and other essential nutrients [22,23,24,25]. Notably, the kernel contains α-linolenic acid, an essential fatty acid with cardiovascular, brain, and retinal health benefits [26,27,28], as well as phosphorus, potassium, vitamin B, and other trace elements [29,30,31]. Additionally, the kernel has anti-cancer, anti-aging, and gastrointestinal health properties. The seed coat contains insoluble fiber as well as anti-nutritional factors [32].
Flaxseed dehulling is of significant importance in expanding applications in food processing. It not only enhances the quality and grade of flaxseed but also increases nutritional value and reduces anti-nutritional factors, making it more suitable for subsequent processing. Additionally, while flaxseed cake is utilized as livestock feed, its utilization rate is often low, leading to resource wastage [33,34]. Therefore, flaxseed dehulling offers positive benefits for both food processing and consumption. Through in-depth research and application of flaxseed dehulling processes, exploring optimal processing and utilization methods for flaxseed can further uncover potential applications in various fields.

3. Research Status of Prevailing Dehulling Technologies

Presently, the relatively mature dehulling methods in China include chemical dehulling, enzymatic dehulling, microwave/roasting dehulling, steam explosion dehulling, and mechanical dehulling. In recent years, dehulling methods such as infrared dehulling and ultrasonic dehulling have also appeared.

3.1. Chemical Dehulling

Chemical dehulling utilizes alkaline (or acidic) solutions, ethanol, or other chemical solvents to soften or degrade the seed coat tissue. It is commonly employed to remove the outer layers of grains, legumes, oil crops, certain fruits, and tubers, thereby improving the edibility and processing utilization rate. The mechanism of chemical dehulling is illustrated in Figure 1.
Researchers continuously optimize the process parameters of chemical dehulling methods to enhance the efficiency of dehulling and reduce the impact on internal components. Shi et al. [35] investigated the heat-alkali dehulling process of peony seeds and determined the optimal process conditions for peony seed dehulling based on single-factor experiments. They found that the best conditions were achieved with a NaOH concentration of 9%, a heating time of 5 min, and a heating temperature of 80 °C. Liu et al. [36] studied the wet dehulling and hot air drying processing of sesame seeds. Using the dehulling rate, brightness, and yellowness score as indicators, they determined the optimal process conditions for wet dehulling of sesame seeds through single-factor and orthogonal experiments. The optimal conditions were found to be an alkali solution mass concentration of 0.9 g/mL, soaking temperature of 60 °C, soaking time of 5 min, and a material–liquid ratio of 1:6. Under the optimal dehulling conditions, the comprehensive score of sesame seed quality was 154.51. This dehulling process combined with hot air drying can produce high-quality sesame seeds. Zhu et al. [37] studied the effects of various factors on the dehulling efficiency of hazelnuts in the alkali dehulling process through single-factor and orthogonal experiments using European hazelnuts as the test material. They optimized the process conditions of alkali dehulling and obtained the optimal process parameters, providing references for subsequent research. Liang et al. [38] disclosed an invention of a method for separating sesame husks and kernels based on ethanol wet filtration (Figure 2). Using anhydrous ethanol or 95% ethanol for defatting crushed sesame seeds, they effectively separated sesame husks and kernels through wet filtration. This method is characterized by its simplicity, high separation efficiency, low energy consumption, low pollution, and high comprehensive recovery rate.
Comprehensive analysis shows that the chemical dehulling method is simple to operate, has relatively high efficiency, achieves uniform dehulling, and is not affected by the external shape of the material, making it widely adaptable. However, it can easily lead to issues such as chemical solvent residues, nutritional losses, and environmental pollution.

3.2. Biological Dehulling

Biological dehulling mainly relies on the catalytic action of biological enzymes to degrade the seed coat tissue and achieve dehulling. Ma et al. [39] summarized the role of enzymes in the dehulling process of buckwheat, aiming to provide an important theoretical basis for the key technology of buckwheat seed dehulling. Song et al. [40] used cellulase and xylanase for enzymatic dehulling of sesame seeds (Figure 3), achieving a dehulling rate of up to 98.3%. This process can replace the traditional alkaline wet dehulling process and meets the requirements of green and environmentally friendly production. Wang Jianhui et al. [41] utilized a biological composite enzyme to remove the seed coat of lotus seeds, not only preserving the original color and flavor of the lotus seeds but also reducing production costs. Wu et al. [42] studied an enzymatic method for removing the seed coat of oil-tea camellia seeds, which avoids nutritional losses in the kernels and features low consumption, environmental friendliness, and mild conditions.
Overall, biological dehulling technology has the characteristics of high efficiency, mildness, and environmental friendliness. Compared to chemical dehulling, enzymatic dehulling is more costly, time-consuming, and requires stringent reaction conditions. Therefore, it is necessary to weigh the pros and cons to decide whether to adopt enzymatic dehulling.

3.3. Mechanical Dehulling

Mechanical dehulling removes the skin through physical force and mechanical action, with various methods such as rolling and rubbing, shearing, impact, extrusion, etc. [43,44,45,46]. It has wide applicability, featuring simple operation, diverse methods, and ensures food quality and safety. The working principle is shown in Table 1.

3.3.1. Rolling and Rubbing Method

Huang et al. [52,53] developed an extrusion milling camellia seed dehulling machine (Figure 4), employing a roller and cylindrical sieve mechanism. The device is characterized by operational simplicity, stable performance, and low raw material moisture requirements. Under specific conditions, it achieves a minimum dehulling rate of 98.5%, with less than 4% hull content in kernels and less than 1% kernel content in hulls. Zhu et al. [54], through comparative dehulling experiments with different pretreatments, found that dehulling ginkgo nuts pre-treated by boiling, microwave, and drying processes, using a grinding wheel with a 10 mm gap and a 15° incline, resulted in nearly 100% shell breaking rates, with whole kernel rates of 98%, 94%, and 97% respectively. These results provide a basis for the optimized design of ginkgo nut dehulling devices. Hou et al. [55], based on the physical and mechanical properties of castor capsules, designed a double-conical castor dehulling and cleaning device, achieving a clean dehulling rate of 92.03% and a breakage rate of 3.1%. This device offers high dehulling efficiency and broad adaptability, meeting the industrial processing needs for castor. Fan et al. [56,57] invented a grinding-type sunflower seed hulling device, conducting two hulling operations on sunflower seeds. Employing the principle of aerodynamics with a suction fan for sorting the dehulled materials, this device achieves complete dehulling and impurity removal while maintaining the integrity and cleanliness of the seeds, thus enhancing the automation and efficiency of the dehulling and cleaning process.

3.3.2. Shear Method

Shearing dehulling is generally not used alone, but rather combined with impact, extrusion, and rolling and rubbing in a multi-mode approach. Li et al. [58] designed a toothed roll-type dehulling mechanism for mechanically dehulling knife beans. The mechanism utilizes the principle of combined extrusion and shear to generate a tearing effect on the shell, which meets the performance requirements of the mechanized dehulling processing of the knife bean. Hao et al. [59] designed a cone-plate peanut shelling device, which accomplishes dehulling through the shearing and grinding of the upper and lower cone plates, achieving a 97.84% dehulling rate and 3.27% damage rate, providing a reference for the research and improvement of peanut shelling machines. Wan [60] designed a clamping-type freshwater chestnut dehulling machine, as shown in Figure 5. In this machine, the freshwater chestnuts are first longitudinally cut open by the rotating transversal cutting blade, which is fixed on the baseplate. Subsequently, the shearing and extrusion between two pairs of rubber rollers rotating at different speeds are utilized to dehull the pre-cut freshwater chestnuts. Through theoretical analysis, simulation, and prototype testing, the optimal working parameters for the horizontal cutting and dehulling units were studied, providing a theoretical basis for the design and application of dehulling equipment.

3.3.3. Impact Method

The impact method is considered ideal for dehulling small-grained oil crops [61], because it avoids hull-kernel adhesion and utilizes relatively simple dehulling equipment and processes without material grading. Sharma et al. [62,63] studied the dehulling performance of a centrifugal impact-type camellia seed dehuller, achieving higher whole kernel rates and dehulling efficiency under lower moisture content and suitable rotational speeds. This machine is applicable for small or medium-sized enterprises to dehull camellia and similar seeds. Yu et al. [64] developed a rapeseed dehulling and separation device utilizing centrifugal and impact forces, attaining an 85% dehulling rate, with kernels containing 4% hull, hulls containing 1% kernel, and a 3% powder rate after industrial trials. This device has a simple structure, and advanced technical indicators, and is well-suited for industrial applications. Guo et al. [65,66] employed a two-stage impact dehulling method to optimize the performance of a dehulling machine (Figure 6). Initially, rapeseeds are accelerated and impacted against a toothed ring by a centrifugal disc for preliminary dehulling, followed by a secondary dehulling plate to further enhance the dehulling rate. Ranjeet et al. [67] developed a centrifugal melon seed dehuller based on the centrifugal collision principle, achieving a 51% dehulling rate and a 32% seed damage rate. While this device has a simple structure and low maintenance cost, its dehulling rate is relatively low, and seed damage is significant, necessitating optimization of structural parameters.

3.3.4. Extrusion Method

Wang et al. [68] developed an innovative pine seed sheller with two counter-rotating extrusion rollers with arched (Figure 7), indented surfaces and a guiding device for precise nut positioning and feeding, achieving a dehulling rate with more than 98% whole kernel retention. This technology, showcasing versatility, is also applicable to hazelnuts and apricot kernels. Guo et al. [69] introduced a side extrusion-type apricot kernel shelling machine, noted for its simplicity, cost-effectiveness, and superior dehulling performance, making it ideal for small-to-medium scales and a diverse variety of processing methods. Li et al. [70,71] presented a walnut cracking device using an extrusion-friction mechanism, systematically exploring the impact of walnut physical properties on cracking efficiency to establish optimal design parameters. Zhu et al. [72,73] designed a lotus seed dehulling machine (Figure 8) that integrates mechanical cutting and extrusion with an internal feed sorting system for eliminating size classification, and enhancing adaptability to seeds of various sizes. The machine incorporates a unique suspended vibratory dehulling mechanism (Figure 8b), achieving a 92% dehulling rate, 100% whole kernel retention, and less than 10% damage rate, fulfilling the high standards of fresh lotus seed processing. Its design prioritizes simplicity, robustness, and cost-effectiveness, promoting its potential for widespread use in lotus cultivation.

3.4. Other Dehulling

3.4.1. Microwave/Roasting Dehulling Method

The microwave/roasting dehulling technique utilizes thermal energy from a microwave or roasting oven to induce moisture evaporation within the intricate tissue structures of the material. This evaporation leads to cellular dehydration and tissue shrinkage, consequently facilitating the separation of the husk from the kernel. Notably, microwave energy primarily acts on the material’s surface, whereas roasting promotes internal heating. Materials with high moisture content are well-suited for microwave dehulling, while those with a higher fat content are more amenable to roasting dehulling. This method is characterized by its operational simplicity, rapid processing speed, high efficiency, exceptional dehulling efficacy, and minimal material degradation, rendering it one of the widely adopted pretreatment techniques. In a pioneering study, Zhang et al. [74] conducted a comparative evaluation of four distinct dehulling methods using peanut kernels as the test material. The findings revealed that the frozen-microwave roasting dehulling method yielded superior results, achieving a 100% dehulling rate. The detailed process flow is illustrated in Figure 9. Notably, the dehulled peanut kernels exhibited the lowest peroxide value, a visually appealing bright appearance, and a significant reduction in rancidity, thereby effectively preserving the intrinsic quality and organoleptic properties of the peanut kernels.
The limited effectiveness of employing singular techniques, such as microwave treatment [75] or roasting [76], in achieving satisfactory husk removal has been well documented, often resulting in undesirable color alterations in chestnut kernels. To address this limitation, He et al. [77] devised an innovative approach that synergistically combined microwave treatment and roasting for the husk removal of chestnuts. The method involved an initial microwave pretreatment stage to loosen the chestnut husk layer, followed by a subsequent roasting step to facilitate the complete removal of the chestnut skins. This integrated process yielded an impressive husk removal rate of up to 97.96%. Concurrently, Oomah et al. [78] conducted a comprehensive investigation into the impact of microwave treatment on the husking efficiency of sesame seeds. Their findings conclusively demonstrated that microwave pretreatment significantly enhances the husking efficiency of sesame seeds. Notably, this combined microwave and roasting technique exhibits promising potential for extension to the husking treatment of various other oilseed varieties.

3.4.2. Steam Explosion Dehulling Method

The steam explosion process involves two distinct phases: high-temperature steam cooking and instantaneous pressure release explosion [79]. The principle involves subjecting fibrous materials to high temperatures (160–260 °C) and pressures (0.69–4.83 MPa) for a predetermined duration. Under these extreme conditions, steam diffuses into the intricate microstructure of the lignocellulosic fiber cell walls, effectively weakening the adhesive forces between the kernel and its enclosing hull or husk. Upon completion of the high-pressure steam treatment, an abrupt depressurization and cooling phase is initiated, triggering the rapid release of the high-pressure gaseous species confined within the material matrix. Sudden release induces substantial expansion and rupturing of the fibrous cell walls, consequently facilitating the desired separation of the kernel from its surrounding hull or husk [80]. The principle is illustrated in Figure 10.
Tian et al. [81] proposed a steam dehulling machine (Figure 11) that utilizes a steam boiler to generate high-temperature and high-pressure steam. The steam is conveyed through pipelines and rotary joints into a horizontally positioned, rotatable steam reaction vessel. Material is fed into the steam reaction vessel through the discharge port of the top feeder. As the steam reaction vessel rotates, the high-temperature and high-pressure steam acts on the surface of the material, causing the outer skin to separate and fall away from the inner core. The dehulled material is discharged from the bottom discharge port of the steam reaction vessel and transported to the external collection pool via a mesh belt conveyor for further processing. Through the synergistic action of mechanical rotation within the steam reaction vessel and exposure to high-temperature, high-pressure steam, this machine achieves continuous, rapid, and automated dehulling treatment of various materials. Liu et al. [82] disclosed a steam dehulling machine, as illustrated in Figure 11, which employs high-temperature and high-pressure steam treatment to rapidly transform the internal moisture of the product into pressurized water. Subsequently, relying on the substantial expansion energy released during the depressurization and evaporation process, the pressurized water effectively separates the outer skin from the pulp, ultimately achieving the desired dehulling outcome.
In summary, the steam explosion dehulling method has been an emerging economic physicochemical pretreatment approach in recent years. It is not limited by material shape, can better preserve flavor and nutritional value, and features high efficiency, and low-consumption environmental friendliness. However, the equipment cost is relatively high, making it unsuitable for low-budget or small-scale production demands.

3.4.3. Ultrasonic Dehulling Method

The principle of ultrasonic dehulling is based on high-frequency sound waves (20–100 kHz) [83,84]. Under the influence of ultrasonic waves, tiny bubbles in the liquid undergo cyclic expansion and collapse, resulting in the generation of extremely high localized pressure and temperature within the liquid [85,86]. This phenomenon, known as “growth-collapse” cavitation, along with the shearing effect of the liquid jet, disrupts and loosens the surface tissue of the grains, facilitating the decomposition of macromolecules such as cellulose in the cortex or cell wall components. Simultaneously, the oscillation of sound waves enhances cell membrane permeability, expediting penetration and softening of the grains. Additionally, localized high temperatures induce protein denaturation or alteration of other constituents between the cortex and endosperm, thereby reducing the bonding force within the husk and enabling effective dehulling [87,88,89]. The dehulling mechanism is illustrated in Figure 12.
Fang et al. [90] employed ultrasonic-assisted alkaline peeling technology to process walnut kernels. The process flow is illustrated in Figure 13. Through single-factor experiments, the researchers determined four influencing factors: NaOH concentration, alkali solution temperature, alkali solution treatment time, and ultrasonic power. They optimized the dehulling process conditions of walnut kernels using the response surface methodology. This method demonstrated easy dehulling, high whole kernel yield, and a high dehulling rate. The peeled walnut kernels exhibited a crispy texture, milky-white color, and no alkaline taste, providing valuable insights for further research into ultrasonic dehulling techniques. Sunil et al. [91] utilized the response surface methodology to investigate the impact of ultrasound on the dehulling of black beans. The results revealed that increasing ultrasound power and treatment time significantly enhanced the dehulling yield and reduced dehulling loss. The dehulling yield reached 75.71%, with a dehulling loss of 12.72%. Compared to mere soaking, ultrasound pretreatment effectively improved the dehulling efficiency of black beans.
Overall, ultrasonic pretreatment is an efficient, gentle, and environmentally friendly dehulling technique that significantly improves the effectiveness of the dehulling process while ensuring high product quality [92,93]. However, the efficacy of dehulling is susceptible to limitations imposed by the size and shape of the raw materials. Large or irregularly shaped raw materials hinder the propagation and action of ultrasound, thereby impacting the uniformity of the dehulling process.

3.4.4. Infrared Dehulling Method

The principle of infrared dehulling relies on the thermal effect of infrared radiation [94,95]. Surface tissues selectively absorb infrared radiation energy, leading to rapid moisture vaporization and expansion within these tissues. This process weakens the bond between the hull and the kernel, making it a current research focus in dehulling technology. Jong et al. [96,97] validated selective heating characteristics using infrared technology, enabling targeted heating of surface tissues for dehulling. Gao et al. [98] optimized infrared parameters for rice drying and dehulling, aiming to provide valuable references for infrared technology applications in grain pretreatment. Kate et al. [99] achieved a 92.77% ginger dehulling rate, 6.94% dehulling loss, and 9.6% unhulled rate through infrared dehulling experiments. Li et al. [100,101,102,103] designed an infrared tomato peeling device (Figure 14), utilizing infrared emitters to heat and soften tomato surfaces, achieving effective tomato peeling by improving heating uniformity and radiation intensity through rotation.
Infrared dehulling achieves selective heating by precisely controlling the parameters of infrared radiation. It rapidly and effectively removes seed coats without damaging the kernels, offering advantages such as low losses, high efficiency, environmental friendliness, and flexible control. Additionally, infrared pretreatment disrupts cell structures, promoting oil release and significantly increasing rapeseed oil yield [104]. However, the successful application of infrared dehulling technology requires thorough research and testing tailored to specific materials and requirements to ensure high efficiency and applicability.

4. Current Status of Flaxseed Dehulling Technologies in China

In the early stages of oilseed processing in China, traditional manual methods were primarily used for dehulling. However, research on oilseed dehulling and separation equipment began to emerge gradually in the early 20th century. Developed by Huazhong Agricultural University, the rapeseed shell-kernel separation machine incorporates a pneumatic system for suction-based material transport and air separation, as well as a mechanical system comprising a centrifugal impact dehuller and dual separation units. The operating principle involves fracturing rapeseed kernels under centrifugal and impact forces, then conveying the resulting mixture of dehulled shells, kernels, seeds, and powder to a vibrating screen in the first separation unit. The screen’s oscillatory motion, driven by an eccentric wheel, creates a suspended, stratified state of the mixture under suction, enabling the separation and extraction of shells and powder, which are collected via a cyclone separator. The kernel-seed mixture then undergoes further separation by airflow to remove residual shells, before proceeding to the second separation unit where purified kernels are collected using another cyclone separator, while any un-dehulled whole seeds are recycled for reprocessing. This machine achieves kernel and hull contents of less than 4% and 5%, respectively. The Oil Crops Research Institute of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences has developed a shell-kernel separation device [105] that utilizes the principle of centrifugal collision to evenly feed the mixture of dehulled shells and kernels onto a fluidized screening plate of a sorting box. An upward airflow is introduced at the lower end of the fluidized screening plate, causing the mixture to suspend and move forward under the action of the screening plate and airflow. Gradually, shells, kernels, and un-dehulled whole seeds form three distinct layers. Powder, shells, and kernels are then separately extracted through three suction ports positioned at different heights, while un-dehulled whole seeds are discharged from the end of the screening plate and returned to the dehuller for reprocessing. The extracted shells, kernels, and powder are further separated and collected using a cyclone separator. This process ultimately achieves a kernel content in shells of 2% to 4% and a shell content in kernels of less than 2%. Li et al. [106,107] developed a flaxseed dehuller based on centrifugal collision, utilizing electrostatic adsorption to separate kernels and hulls. At optimal conditions, it achieved <1% kernel content in hulls and <3% hull content in kernels, with simple operation but high power consumption, seed breakage rate, and cost, hindering large-scale production. Ding et al. [108,109] utilized rolling action from dynamic/static sand discs and flaxseeds themselves for shell-kernel separation (Figure 15). The adjustable-clearance structure suits various seed sizes, but frequent disc replacement leads to seed damage and low efficiency. Xiao proposed automated flaxseed processing equipment based on electrostatic separation [110], achieving continuous sterilization, dehulling, and separation. It utilizes opposing rollers for crushing/dehulling and an electrostatic belt for automatic hull-kernel separation, improving efficiency but with a complex structure, high power consumption, breakage rate, and waste. Wang et al. proposed a new dehulling process: pretreatment → enzymatic hydrolysis → liquid nitrogen freezing → centrifugal impact → kernel [111]. Li et al. developed a centrifugal collision dehuller [112] based on this, improving efficiency through pretreatment with low losses and good kernel integrity, but risking chemical residues and weak continuous capacity for industrial demands. Currently, the advanced TFYMZ-200 (Figure 16) employs pneumatic and electrostatic dehulling. Through a control panel, airspeed is adjusted to separate flax seeds from the hulls. After dehulling, the mixture undergoes an initial selection via a vibrating air separator. Subsequently, the principle of electrostatic adsorption is employed for the further precise separation of flax seeds from their hulls. This machine boasts a raw material processing capacity of up to 200 kg/h, with both the kernel content in seeds and the seed content in hulls being below 2%, indicating a high dehulling rate. The equipment is stable, reliable, and highly automated, capable of dehulling, hull removal, and sorting of flaxseed materials, thus meeting the demands of industrial processing.
An analysis of the current literature reveals that China has conducted extensive research on flaxseed component extraction and nutritional value. However, studies focusing on the fundamental properties and parameters of flaxseed remain scarce, leading to inadequate theoretical guidance [113]. Currently, flaxseed dehulling equipment is still in the experimental stage, with few manufacturers producing such equipment at scale. Although efforts have been made domestically to develop various types of new dehulling machinery based on traditional methods, progress has been slow. The few mature models available and limited batch production capabilities significantly lag behind the increasing demand for deep processing of agricultural products. Many technical challenges still need to be addressed, necessitating further optimization and research in this area.

5. Issues and Development Suggestions

Comprehensive analysis reveals that there are several issues with flaxseed dehulling technology in China. To address these challenges and further promote innovative development, it is recommended to implement further improvements.
  • Insufficient foundational research on flaxseed in China. The mechanical properties and dehulling kinetics of flaxseed remain inadequately studied, hindering accurate modeling and simulation of the dehulling process. This lack of theoretical guidance leads to deficiencies in process design and equipment development. Therefore, strengthening theoretical research on flaxseed dehulling is essential to provide a scientific basis for process and equipment design and parameter optimization.
  • Innovative and efficient flaxseed dehulling technologies are essential to address the inefficiencies and substantial losses of current mechanical methods in China, which achieve dehulling rates of ≤80% with losses ≥10% [114]. Exploring eco-friendly, advanced techniques such as ultrasonic, enzymatic, and microwave-assisted dehulling [78,91,115], and developing chemical reagents for selective seed coat dissolution, hold promise for improving dehulling quality and yield. Moreover, the advancement of rapid, real-time monitoring technology for dehulling quality is crucial for process optimization and represents a significant avenue for innovation in flaxseed processing.
  • The industrial production system for flaxseed dehulling equipment needs improvement. Existing equipment is predominantly in the external design and small-scale testing phase. It is imperative to encourage enterprises to increase technological investment and drive the development of automated, intelligent, and large-scale flaxseed dehulling equipment.

6. Conclusions

This study performed a comprehensive analysis of key and advanced dehulling technologies, summarizing methods and process flows across different techniques, and examined their characteristics and the variance in dehulling outcomes. The goal is to foster innovative development in China’s flaxseed dehulling technology by providing new theoretical insights and support. It finds that mechanical dehulling, the predominant method in China, achieves less than 80% efficiency with a damage rate of more than 10%, lagging significantly behind international standards. This shortfall is attributed to a lack of in-depth theoretical research on flaxseed, insufficient equipment innovation, and delayed process improvements, with many dehulling machines still at the experimental stage.
The future development of flaxseed dehulling technology in China should focus on: (1) intensifying research on flaxseed’s physical and chemical properties and dehulling mechanisms to underpin process and equipment innovation; (2) continuous optimization of mechanical dehulling technology, including key component design and process parameters, while advancing automation and intelligence; (3) exploring more environmentally friendly dehulling methods, coupled with the development of detection technologies for real-time quality monitoring to adjust processes and improve flaxseed quality and nutrition; and (4) encouraging enterprise investment in standardization and large-scale production to meet diverse market demands. This approach aims to provide valuable insights and guidance for the advancement of flaxseed dehulling technology in China.

Author Contributions

Literature collection, L.C. and W.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, L.C. and R.S.; writing—review and Editing, W.Z., F.D., R.S., Y.Z. and J.C.; funding acquisition, W.Z., F.D. and R.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the support from the Ministry of Finance and the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs: The National Modern Agricultural Industrial Technology System Project (CARS-14-1-28) and the Gansu Provincial Department of Education: Major Cultivation Project of Scientific Research and Innovation Platform for Colleges and Universities (2024CXPT-15); the Gansu Provincial Major Special Scientific and Technological Project (21ZD4NA022-05); the Gansu Provincial Department of Agriculture and Rural Affairs: Agricultural Machinery and Equipment R&D Tackling Key Project (njyf2024-02-1).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the authors.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the editor for providing helpful suggestions for improving the quality of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dai, F.; Zhao, W.Y.; Shi, R.J.; Zhao, Y.M.; Zhang, F.W.; Liu, X.L.; Zhang, S.L. Research progress analysis of key technology and equipment for mechanized harvest of flax. Chin. J. Oil Crop Sci. 2022, 44, 1148–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xu, L.; Wei, Z.; Guo, B.; Bai, R.; Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Sun, W.; Jiang, X.; Li, X.; Pi, Y. Flaxseed meal and its application in animal husbandry: A Review. Agriculture 2022, 12, 2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Singh, K.K.; Mridula, D.; Rehal, J.; Barnwal, P. Flaxseed: A potential source of food, feed and fiber. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2011, 51, 210–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dai, F.; Zhao, W.Y.; Song, X.F.; Shi, R.J.; Liu, G.C.; Wei, B. Parameters optimization and experiment on separating and cleaning machine for flax threshing material. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2020, 51, 100–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Shi, R.; Dai, F.; Zhao, W.; Liu, X.; Wang, T.; Zhao, Y. Optimal design and testing of a crawler-type flax combine harvester. Agriculture 2023, 13, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gao, Y.H.; Niu, J.Y.; Guo, L.Z.B. Theory and Technology Research on High-Yield and Efficient Cultivation of Flaxseed; China Agricultural Science and Technology Press: Beijing, China, 2019; pp. 154–196. [Google Scholar]
  7. Wang, R.Y. Further Promoting the High-Quality Development of China’s Linseed Oil Industry—Speech at the “Seventh National Flaxseed Oil and Omega-3 Fat Industry Innovation Strategic Alliance Annual Meeting and First Landmark Product Yuyuan Sesame Oil (Liupan Mountain Plateau Flax) High-Quality Development Forum”. Chin. Oils 2023, 48, 14–16. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sun, J.; Hu, H.B.; Yang, B. Optimization of microwave—Ultrasound—Assisted extraction of flaxseed gum by response surface methodology. China Oils Fats 2015, 40, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, P.Q.; Dai, F.; Zhao, W.Y.; Shi, R.J.; Song, X.F.; Qu, J.F. Simulation analysis and experiment of operation process of flax threshing and cleaning device. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2023, 54 (Suppl. S1), 161–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dai, F.; Zhao, W.Y.; Fu, Q.F.; Song, X.F.; Shi, R.J.; Li, Y.W. Parameter optimization and experiment on double duct system of air-screen separating and cleaning machine for flax threshing material. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2021, 52, 83–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nadimi, S.M.; Divyanth, L.G.; Chaudhry, M.M.A.; Singh, T.; Loewen, G.; Paliwal, J. Assessment of mechanical damage and germinability in flaxseeds using hyperspectral imaging. Foods. 2024, 13, 120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ocaña-Sánchez, M.F.; Soto-Ojeda, G.A.; Cocotle-Ronzón, Y.; Soria-Fregozo, C.; Sánchez-Medina, A.; García-Rodríguez, R.V.; Rodríguez-Landa, J.F.; Corro-Méndez, E.J.; Hernández-Lozano, M. Flaxseed oil (Linum usitatissimum) prevents cognitive and motor damage in rats with hyperammonemia. Nutrients 2023, 15, 4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cao, W.W.; Hang, Q.D.; Tian, G.J.; Deng, Q.C. Effect of detoxified, partially defatted flaxseed meals on the quality of steamed bread. Mod. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 32, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Lee, J.H.; Shim, Y.Y.; Reaney, M.J.T.; Yoon, J.A. The impacts of standardized flaxseed meal (XanFlax) on the physicochemical, textural, and sensory properties of muffins. Foods 2023, 12, 4085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Wang, B.B. Research on Stability of Flaxseed Meal and Its Product Development. Master’s Thesis, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, China, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, W.Y.; Xu, S.Q.; He, H.Y.; Wang, W. Progress in nutrients and function of flaxseed. Chin. Oils. 2020, 45, 83–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tan, H.Q.; Mao, Z.H.; Yang, H.Z. Experimental study on spray drying of flaxseed gum. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2004, 6, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.M.; Dang, Z.; Zhao, W.; Li, W.J.; Xie, Y.P.; Qi, Y.N.; Zhang, J.P. Genetic analysis of plant height in flax using segregating generations and recombination inbred line populations. J. Plant Genet. Resour. 2022, 23, 1446–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Chen, Y.S.; Zheng, R.F.; Cheng, Y.M.; Zhou, Q.; Deng, Q.C. Effect of oilseed moisture conditioning combined with microwave on edible quality of flaxseed-based milk. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2023, 39, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, J.S.; Li, Y.C.; Su, C.H.; Li, Q.; Yu, X.Z. Research progress on effects of oilseeds pretreatment on oil quality. China Oils Fats 2023, 48, 16–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mei, Q.Q.; Dong, S.Y.; Fang, W.; Huang, J.B.; Hang, G.D.; Zhong, X.F. Study on the development and storage stability of solidified dehulled flaxseed fermented milk. Food Ferment. Ind. 2023, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, H.L.; Wei, J.S.; Li, C.H.; Jing, Y.P.; Zhao, T.; Zhang, X.G.; Zhang, C.J. Effect of dietary flaxseed powder on intestinal flora structure in healthy adults. Food Sci. 2018, 39, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ifeanyi, D.N.; Aluko, R.E. Physicochemical and emulsification properties of flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum) albumin and globulin fractions. Food Chem. 2018, 255, 216–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bekhit, A.E.-D.A.; Shavandi, A.; Jodjaja, T.; Birch, J.; Teh, S.; Ahmed, I.A.M.; Al-Juhaimi, F.Y.; Saeedi, P.; Bekhit, A.A. Flaxseed, composition, detoxification, utilization, and opportunities. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2018, 13, 129–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zou, X.G.; Guan, X.Q.; Zheng, M.; Cao, Y.; Deng, Z.Y.; Yang, K.; Neng, J. Research progress on main functional components and biological activity of Linum usitatissimum. Food Ferment. Ind. 2024, 50, 366–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Chen, C.P.; Liu, Y. Advance of research in genome and important trait genes in flax. Acta Agric. Boreali-Occident. Sin. 2023, 32, 495–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Han, D.D. Study on the Flaxseed Oil Extraction Process and the α-Linolenic Acid Purification Technology. Master’s Thesis, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun, China, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  28. Xue, W.W.; Wu, L.K.; Hu, S.A.; Zhao, L.C.; Wang, L.J. Research and application of oilomics in vegetable oil processing. China Oils Fats 2024, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ranhotar, G.S. Lipidemic response in rats flaxseed oil and meal. Cereal Chem. 1993, 70, 324–329. [Google Scholar]
  30. Chen, H.H. Nutrient components and utilization of flaxseed. China Oils Fats 2004, 6, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Qiu, C.S.; Guo, Y.; Long, S.H.; Deng, X.; Wang, Y.F. The nutrients and exploitation of flaxseed. Food Res. Dev. 2014, 35, 122–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Gonzālez-Esquerra, R.; Ma, Y.F.; Zhao, K.B. Enrichment of omega-3 fatty acids in poultry eggs and meat. China Anim. Husb. Vet. Med. 2002, 6, 21–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hao, J.J.; Shi, H.T.; Xie, L.Z.; Li, S.L. Nutritive values of flaxseed and flaxseed meal and their application in livestock and poultry diets. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2020, 32, 4059–4069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhang, X.X.; Zhang, K.; Cheng, Y.Q.; Jia, X. Development and formula optimization of flaxseed biscuits. Cereals Oils. 2022, 35, 127–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Shi, C.; Yin, Z.Y.; Zheng, X.X. The influence of alkali peeling technology on peony seed yield efficiency. J. Chongqing Technol. Bus. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.). 2016, 33, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, B.G.; Wang, X.D.; Peng, J.Z.; Liu, R.B. Wet dehulling of sesame and hot-air drying of sesame seed. China Oils Fats 2014, 39, 78–81. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhu, M.Y.; Yin, H.Z.; Liang, L.S.; Wang, G.X.; Ma, Q.H. Optimization of the technology for peeling hazelnut kernel by lye. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 14, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liang, S.; Wang, Y.; Ge, J.J.; Deng, F.G.; Zhang, Z. A Method for Separation of Flaxseed Shell and Kernel Based on Ethanol Wet Filtration. China Patent CN108686736B, 8 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
  39. Ma, G.F.; Xin, H.B.; Xiu, L.; Sun, C.X.; Zhang, H. Buckwheat seed shelling characters, a review. Chin. Agric. Sci. Bull. 2022, 38, 19–27. [Google Scholar]
  40. Song, G.H.; Huang, J.N.; Lu, X.; Sun, Q.; Zhang, L.X. Optimization of enzymatic peeling of sesame. Food Sci. 2013, 34, 28–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, J.H.; Liu, Y.L.; Cheng, Y.Y.; Wang, F.X.; Li, X.H.; Yu, J. A Method for Biocomposite Enzymatic Removal of Lotus Seed Coat. China Patent CN102823922B, 27 August 2014. [Google Scholar]
  42. Wu, S.X.; Yan, S.H.; Song, B.; Liu, R.X.; Tan, C.B. A Biocatalytic Method for Dehusking Camellia Seeds. China Patent CN104046506A, 17 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang, L.Q.; Gong, L. Status quo about shelling machine and discussing about improving methods. Food Mach. 2006, 4, 72–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Fan, H.Y.; Wang, T.; Wu, D.; He, X.F. Design of extrusion-grind rubber fruit test sheller. Food Mach. 2016, 32, 64–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Tang, X.; Xie, F.P.; Li, X.; Liu, D.W.; Wang, X.S.; Mao, L.C. Design and test of dehulling machine for camellia oleifera fruit. J. Hunan Agric. Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 2014, 40, 665–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mai, S.H.; Wang, T.; Lin, Y.; Li, Y. Design of rubber fruit sheller. Food Mach. 2014, 30, 112–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Li, X.X.; Guo, Y.M. Actuality of the decladding method and sheller of shell fruit. Acad. Period. Farm Prod. Process. 2007, 36, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Du, W.H. Study on the hulling technology of fruit. J. Taiyuan Norm. Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2003, 2, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Zhang, L. Research and development of equipment for peeling rapeseed and separating hull and kernel. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2004, 20, 140–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhao, X.G.; Zong, L. Application and development of husking technology for nut materials. Xinjiang Agric. Mach. 2005, 6, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, Y.R. Optimization Design and Experiment of Flexible Compound Rubber Seed Sheller. Master’s Thesis, Hainan University, Haikou, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Huang, F.H.; Li, W.L.; Xia, F.J.; Niu, Y.X. Research and application of dehulling machine for camellia oleosa seed. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2006, 22, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xiong, P.Y.; Wang, Y.; Xu, X.Q.; Xue, M.J.; Zhang, H.X.; Li, Z.L.; Hu, W.Q. Design and simulation analysis of rolling type camellia seed sheller. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 2019, 41, 135–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhu, L.X.; Zhang, R.H.; Wei, H.Y.; Liu, S.D. Study on extrusion-grind decorticating equipment design and experiment of ginkgo with grinding wheel. Food Mach. 2008, 4, 86–88+123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hou, J.M.; Bai, J.B.; He, T.; Yang, Y.; Li, J.P.; Yao, E.C. Design and experiment of castor dehulling and cleaning device with double curved table. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2018, 49, 132–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, Y.Y.; Li, S.K.; Wang, S.; Yan, J.X.; Wang, Y.H. A Hulling Device for a Rubbing-Type Sunflower Seed Dehuller. China Patent CN205455886U, 17 August 2016. [Google Scholar]
  57. Fan, R.; Bu, B.; Zhou, J.B.; Hou, H.M.; Zhang, N. A Sunflower Seed Dehulling and Cleaning Machine. China Patent CN211458787U, 11 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
  58. Li, J.; Lu, H.Z.; Yang, Z.; Chen, Z.L.; Hang, J.C. Design and experiment of canavalia shelling mechanism. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2013, 29, 26–32. [Google Scholar]
  59. Hao, J.J.; Nie, Q.L.; Ma, L.P.; Li, J.C.; Song, Y.H.; Long, S.F.; Zhang, H.B. Development of cone disc type shelling mechanism for peanut seeds. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2020, 36, 27–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wan, Z.H.; Zhang, G.Z.; Xu, H.M.; Zhou, Y.; Tang, N.R.; Zhang, H. Design and experiment of the clamping sheller for fresh water caltrop. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2022, 38, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zhu, L.X.; Wu, X.J.; Yu, L.M. Comparative study on husking methods of small size oil seeds. Cereals Oils Process. (E-Version) 2000, 5, 18–19+21. [Google Scholar]
  62. Sharma, V.; Pradhan, R.C.; Naik, S.N.; Bhatnagar, N.; Singh, S. Evaluation of a centrifugal impaction-type decorticator for shelling tung fruits. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 43, 126–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bhatnagar, N.; Naik, S.N.; Pradhan, R.C.; Student, P.D. An apparatus for decortications of oil fruits/seeds for separation of shell from kernel. Indian Patent IN264631B, 16 January 2015. [Google Scholar]
  64. Yu, L.M.; Wu, D.S.; Wen, Y.X.; Wu, M.C.; Zhu, L.X. Developing equipment for dehulling and separation of rapeseed. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2002, 17, 40–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Guo, G.S.; Lv, X.M.; Guo, K.Q.; Dang, G.R. Experimental study on husking performance of rapeseed husking machine. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2005, 36, 148–149+154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Guo, G.S.; Lv, X.M.; Dang, G.R.; Guo, K.Q. Double impact husking performance test of rapeseed. J. Northwest A&F Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.). 2005, 10, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ranjeet, S.; Sukhdev, M. Development and evaluation of centrifugal sheller for muskmelon seed. Int. Res. J. Biol. Sci. 2013, 2, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Wang, L.Z.; Zhou, Y.L. Principle of pine seed sheller. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 1991, 1, 98–103. [Google Scholar]
  69. Guo, R.Q.; Liu, Z.L. A new device for shelling almonds. Mach. Des. Res. 2004, 4, 83–84+89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Li, Z.X.; Liu, K.; Yang, L.L.; Basiti, A.; Ma, W.Q.; Yan, S.K. Design and experiment of walnut-cracking device. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2012, 43 (Suppl. S1), 146–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Li, Z.X.; Yang, J.; Yang, L.L.; Liu, K.; Yang, Z.Q.; Liu, J.; Shen, X.H. Research of an equipment about walnut shell breaking. J. Chin. Agric. Mach. 2011, 3, 104–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Zheng, C.X. Experimental research of a lotus seed sheller. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2003, 34, 106–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Zhu, H.Y.; He, J.C.; Fang, W.X.; Ye, D.P.; Liang, S.H. Design and test of small fresh lotus seed sheller. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2017, 33, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Zhang, F.Y.; Xiong, J.H.; Zhou, Z.E.; Min, S.F. Study on peanut peeling technology by microwave baking. Food Sci. 2005, 26, 134–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wang, W.; Chen, C.G.; Zhang, J.Q.; Fang, H.M.; Liu, J.J. Technology of microwave shell bursting of chestnut and design of microwave equipment. Cereals Oils Process. (E-Version) 2002, 7, 44–46. [Google Scholar]
  76. Yang, F.L.; Liang, P.; Zhu, N.; Zi, R.L. Study on methods and equipment of chestnut hulling. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2006, 10, 149–150+152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. He, R.; Jia, L.R.; Wang, J.X.; Gao, H. Optimization of Chinese chestnut shelling peeled process using microwave baking joint. Food Mach. 2016, 32, 192–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Oomah, B.D.; Mazza, G. Fractionation of flaxseed with a batch dehuller. Ind. Crops Prod. 1998, 9, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Liu, R.Q.; Song, L.J.; Shen, Y.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Qiao, M.W. Research progress of steam explosion technology in modification of food macromolecules. Food Ferment. Ind. 2021, 47, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Yang, J.; Teng, H.; Liu, H.J.; Xu, Y.; Lu, J.P.; Wang, J.Y. Feedstock pretreatment and technological process of cellulose ethanol production. Chem. Ind. Eng. Prog. 2013, 32, 97–103. [Google Scholar]
  81. Tian, X.J. A Steam Dehulling Machine. China Patent CN217851230U, 22 November 2022. [Google Scholar]
  82. Liu, W.S. A Steam Dehulling Machine. China Patent CN116509006A, 1 August 2023. [Google Scholar]
  83. McClements, D.J. Advances in the application of ultrasound in food analysis and processing. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 1995, 6, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, W.J.; Wang, L.J.; Feng, Y.M.; Pu, Y.; Ding, T.; Ye, X.Q.; Liu, D.H. Ultrasound-assisted lye peeling of peach and comparison with conventional methods. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 47, 204–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rock, C.R. Development of a Novel Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Peeling Process Using Power Ultrasound Technology. Master’s Thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  86. Bhaskaracharya, R.K.; Kentish, S.; Ashokkumar, M. Selected applications of ultrasonics in food processing. Food Eng. Rev. 2009, 1, 31–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Patil, R.; Sokhansanj, S. Dehulling and Splitting Pulses. In Handbook of Postharvest Technology, Cereals, Fruits, Vegetables, Tea, and Spices; CRC Press: Saskatoon, SK, Canada, 2003; pp. 397–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Ren, H.; Lin, S.W.; Chou, Y.X.; Ran, H.; Jin, Y.; Liu, X.L.; Cui, Y.M.; Wang, P.; Wang, J.R.; Qiao, H.Z. Research progress on the effect of ultrasonic modification on Structures and physicochemical properties of dietary fibers. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2022, 43, 474–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Liang, S.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zeng, X.F.; Bai, W.D.; Zhao, W.H. Research progress on the application of ultrasound in food processing. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2023, 44, 462–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Fang, C.C.; Kan, J.Q. Optimization of ultrasonic assisted alkali peeling process of walnut kernel. Sci. Technol. Food Ind. 2017, 38, 195–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sunil, C.K.; Chidanand, D.V.; Manoj, D.; Pintu, C.; Ashish, R. Effect of ultrasound treatment on dehulling efficiency of blackgram. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2504–2513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Kohli, D.; Champawat, P.S.; Mudgal, V.D.; Jain, S.K.; Tiwari, B.K. Advances in peeling techniques for fresh produce. J. Food Process Eng. 2021, 44, e13826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, L.J.; Jiang, P.; Chu, M.M.; Liu, D.H. The effect of power ultrasound on tomato peeling. J. Chin. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 19, 185–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Wang, X.Y.; Cao, R.B.; Sun, C.Z. Application of infrared radiation technology on processing agriculture biological materials. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2007, 38, 177–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wang, X.Y.; Lin, X.N. Influence factors of kinetics of infrared radiation drying for fruits and vegetables. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Mach. 2009, 40, 114–120. [Google Scholar]
  96. Hong, J.T. Modelling of Infrared Radiation Heat Transfer for Yellow Peas in a Parallel Tray-Type Gas-Fired Micronizer. Master’s Thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB, Canada, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  97. Li, X.; Pan, Z.L.; Atungulu, G.G.; Wood, D.; McHugh, T. Peeling mechanism of tomato under infrared heating, Peel loosening and cracking. Int. J. Food Eng. 2014, 128, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gao, Y.; Guan, L.J.; Li, J.L.; Zhang, Z.H.; Wang, K.L.; Yan, S.; Lu, S.W.; Zhang, L.L. Effects of catalytic infrared drying process parameters on the drying rate of rice and its crackles ratio. J. Chin. Cereals Oils Assoc. 2021, 36, 9–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kate, A.E.; Sutar, P.P. Development and optimization of novel infrared dry peeling method for ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) rhizome. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2018, 48, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, X.; Pan, Z.L.; Atungulu, G.G.; Zheng, X.; Wood, D.; Delwiche, M.; McHugh, T.H. Peeling of tomatoes using novel infrared radiation heating technology. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2014, 21, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wu, B.; Ma, H.; Qu, W.j.; Wang, B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, P.L.; Wang, J. Catalytic infrared and hot air dehydration of carrot slices. J. Food Process Eng. 2014, 37, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, Z.C.; Song, W.D.; Ding, T.H.; Wang, J.L.; Wang, M.Y.; Wu, J.J. Experiment and analysis of tomato infrared heating peeling. J. Chin. Agric. Mach. 2020, 41, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Liu, Z.C. Tomato Peeling Experiment Research and Deviceoptimization Based on Infrared Radiation. Ph.D. Thesis, Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ji, Q.; Pan, L.H.; Li, H.X.; Luo, S.Z.; Zheng, Z. Effect of infrared pretreatment on quality and storage stability of cold-pressed pecan oil. Food Sci. 2024, 45, 257–263. [Google Scholar]
  105. Huang, F.H.; Zhou, L.X.; Li, W.L. Grain and Oil Seed Kernel Separation Equipment. China Patent CN2406743Y, 22 November 2000. [Google Scholar]
  106. LI, Q.; Liang, X.; Hu, X.J. Study on flaxseed peeling and separation technology. China Oils Fats 2006, 31, 35–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Li, Q.; Hu, X.J.; Liang, X.; Xu, G.Y. Flaxseed Dehulling and Separation Method and Device. China Patent CN100496751C, 10 June 2009. [Google Scholar]
  108. Ding, J.F.; Zhao, F.M.; Cao, Y.F.; Li, S.J. Experiment on shelling machine of flaxseed, experiment on shelling machine of flaxseed. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 2017, 39, 158–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ding, J.F. Study on the Critical Technology of Flaxseed Dehulling and Separation and Dehull Equipment. Ph.D. Thesis, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Sciences, Beijing, China, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  110. Xiao, L. An Integrated Primary Processing Equipment for Flaxseed, Electrostatic Separation-Based Decontamination and Sterilization of Impurities. China Patent CN112337651A, 9 February 2021. [Google Scholar]
  111. Wang, W.Y.; Xu, S.Q. An Enzymatic-Hydrolysis and Liquid Nitrogen Freezing Method for Flaxseed Dehulling, and Flaxseed Dehulling Equipment. China Patent CN111184174A, 22 May 2020. [Google Scholar]
  112. Li, W.L.; Dai, F.; Shi, R.J.; Yuan, Z.X.; Zhao, Y.M.; Liu, X.Q.; Pan, H.F.; Deng, H.; Xu, P.Q. A Centrifugal Impact Type Flaxseed Dehuller. China Patent CN217609385U, 21 October 2022. [Google Scholar]
  113. Shi, L.R.; Ma, Z.T.; Zhao, W.Y.; Yang, X.; Sun, B.G.; Zhang, J.P. Calibration of simulation parameters of flaxed seeds using discrete element method and verification of seed-metering test. Trans. Chin. Soc. Agric. Eng. 2019, 35, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Cai, Z.Y.; Li, S.J.; Zhao, F.M.; Cao, Y.F. Flaxseed dehulling technology application and research actuality. J. Agric. Mech. Res. 2013, 35, 247–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, G.J. Ultrasonic Shelling Method and Ultrasonic Shelling Machine. China Patent CN1084370A, 30 March 1994. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Chemical dehulling principle.
Figure 1. Chemical dehulling principle.
Agriculture 14 00632 g001
Figure 2. Ethanol dehulling process of flaxseed.
Figure 2. Ethanol dehulling process of flaxseed.
Agriculture 14 00632 g002
Figure 3. Enzymatic dehulling process of sesame.
Figure 3. Enzymatic dehulling process of sesame.
Agriculture 14 00632 g003
Figure 4. Oil-tea camellia seed sheller: (1) feed hopper; (2) feed regulating baffle plate; (3) spiral ribs and straight ribs; (4) cylindrical screen; (5) frame; (6) automatic dosing gate; (7) discharge port; (8) settling chamber; (9) fine shell outlet; (10) coarse shell outlet; (11) main motor; (12) belt pulley; (13) motor; (14) blower; (15) belt guard; (16) belt; (17) main shaft; (18) bearing block; (19) drum.
Figure 4. Oil-tea camellia seed sheller: (1) feed hopper; (2) feed regulating baffle plate; (3) spiral ribs and straight ribs; (4) cylindrical screen; (5) frame; (6) automatic dosing gate; (7) discharge port; (8) settling chamber; (9) fine shell outlet; (10) coarse shell outlet; (11) main motor; (12) belt pulley; (13) motor; (14) blower; (15) belt guard; (16) belt; (17) main shaft; (18) bearing block; (19) drum.
Agriculture 14 00632 g004
Figure 5. Clamping-type fresh water chestnut dehulling machine: (a) horizontal cutting and dehulling device; (b) local enlargement; (c) clamping-type device; (1) frame; (2) pulley I; (3) chain wheel; (4) baseplate; (5) transversal cutting motor; (6) beam; (7) transversal cutting blade; (8) retaining plate; (9) rubber roller motor; (10) chain; (11) blade shaft; (12) elastic strip; (13) transversal cutting blade; (14) rubber roller.
Figure 5. Clamping-type fresh water chestnut dehulling machine: (a) horizontal cutting and dehulling device; (b) local enlargement; (c) clamping-type device; (1) frame; (2) pulley I; (3) chain wheel; (4) baseplate; (5) transversal cutting motor; (6) beam; (7) transversal cutting blade; (8) retaining plate; (9) rubber roller motor; (10) chain; (11) blade shaft; (12) elastic strip; (13) transversal cutting blade; (14) rubber roller.
Agriculture 14 00632 g005
Figure 6. Rapeseed double impact husking test device: (1) hopper; (2) feed and adjustment set; (3) throwing plate; (4) dentiform circle; (5) secondary dehulling plate; (6) transmission shaft; (7) frame; (8) governor; (9) timing electrical machinery.
Figure 6. Rapeseed double impact husking test device: (1) hopper; (2) feed and adjustment set; (3) throwing plate; (4) dentiform circle; (5) secondary dehulling plate; (6) transmission shaft; (7) frame; (8) governor; (9) timing electrical machinery.
Agriculture 14 00632 g006
Figure 7. Roller structure: (1) extrusion rollers; (2) compression spring; (3) bearing seat; (4) adjusting screws.
Figure 7. Roller structure: (1) extrusion rollers; (2) compression spring; (3) bearing seat; (4) adjusting screws.
Agriculture 14 00632 g007
Figure 8. Schematic of lotus seed sheller: (a) overall structure diagram; (b) suspended vibratory dehulling mechanism; (1) driving wheel; (2) speed regulating motor; (3) suspended vibratory dehulling device; (4) chute; (5) V-belt; (6) hopper; (7) discharge wheel; (8) discharge wheel cover; (9) frame; (10) pressing plate; (11) left guide rail; (12) blade; (13) spring fixing plate; (14) spring; (15) eccentric pin; (16) blade holder; (17) right guide rail.
Figure 8. Schematic of lotus seed sheller: (a) overall structure diagram; (b) suspended vibratory dehulling mechanism; (1) driving wheel; (2) speed regulating motor; (3) suspended vibratory dehulling device; (4) chute; (5) V-belt; (6) hopper; (7) discharge wheel; (8) discharge wheel cover; (9) frame; (10) pressing plate; (11) left guide rail; (12) blade; (13) spring fixing plate; (14) spring; (15) eccentric pin; (16) blade holder; (17) right guide rail.
Agriculture 14 00632 g008
Figure 9. Process flow of removing seed coat from peanut kernels.
Figure 9. Process flow of removing seed coat from peanut kernels.
Agriculture 14 00632 g009
Figure 10. Steam explosion dehulling principle.
Figure 10. Steam explosion dehulling principle.
Agriculture 14 00632 g010
Figure 11. Structure diagram of steam sheller: (1) separator; (2) discharge port; (3) steam reaction tank; (4) motor; (5) mesh belt conveyor; (6) collection pond; (7) discharge port; (8) steam tank; (9) rack; (10) pipeline; (11) rotary joint; (12) gear motor; (13) driveshaft.
Figure 11. Structure diagram of steam sheller: (1) separator; (2) discharge port; (3) steam reaction tank; (4) motor; (5) mesh belt conveyor; (6) collection pond; (7) discharge port; (8) steam tank; (9) rack; (10) pipeline; (11) rotary joint; (12) gear motor; (13) driveshaft.
Agriculture 14 00632 g011
Figure 12. Ultrasonic dehulling principle.
Figure 12. Ultrasonic dehulling principle.
Agriculture 14 00632 g012
Figure 13. Ultrasonic-assisted lye peeling ultrasonic walnut kernel dehulling process flow.
Figure 13. Ultrasonic-assisted lye peeling ultrasonic walnut kernel dehulling process flow.
Agriculture 14 00632 g013
Figure 14. Principle of infrared tomato peeling.
Figure 14. Principle of infrared tomato peeling.
Agriculture 14 00632 g014
Figure 15. The structure of flaxseed dehulling equipment: (1) hopper; (2) feeding control board; (3) fixed table; (4) fixed device of transmission shaft; (5) outlet port; (6) motor; (7) belt; (8) stand; (9) transmission shaft; (10) dynamic table.
Figure 15. The structure of flaxseed dehulling equipment: (1) hopper; (2) feeding control board; (3) fixed table; (4) fixed device of transmission shaft; (5) outlet port; (6) motor; (7) belt; (8) stand; (9) transmission shaft; (10) dynamic table.
Agriculture 14 00632 g015
Figure 16. Flaxseed dehulling equipment TFYMZ-200: (1) input hopper; (2) main part of the equipment; (3) leaf-spring conveyor; (4) spiral elevator; (5) vibrating air-separator; (6) electric control cabinet; (7) electrostatic air separator; (8) vertical air-separating system; (9) bucket elevator.
Figure 16. Flaxseed dehulling equipment TFYMZ-200: (1) input hopper; (2) main part of the equipment; (3) leaf-spring conveyor; (4) spiral elevator; (5) vibrating air-separator; (6) electric control cabinet; (7) electrostatic air separator; (8) vertical air-separating system; (9) bucket elevator.
Agriculture 14 00632 g016
Table 1. Mechanical dehulling principle.
Table 1. Mechanical dehulling principle.
Dehulling Method [47,48,49,50,51]Dehulling PrincipleCharacteristics
Rolling and rubbing methodUtilizes crushing and frictional forces between high-speed rotating abrasive rollers or grinding wheels and conical rolls.Suitable for seeds with weak shell-kernel adhesion like peanuts and rapeseed. High efficiency but prone to material damage, unsuitable for soft surfaces.
Shear methodUnder the shearing action between the knife disk and rotating plate, seeds experience shear forces that cut through the seed coat, achieving dehulling.Minimal kernel breakage, and low mass loss, but susceptible to seed leakage and requires high equipment precision, resulting in lower dehulling efficiency.
Impact methodBy utilizing centrifugal forces, seeds undergo high-speed motion, colliding with the drum wall, causing the seed coat to rupture and detach, achieving dehulling.Suitable for seeds with weak adhesion and brittle coats. Simple and low-cost, but challenging to control impact forces, leading to higher damage rates.
Extrusion methodThe dehulling process is achieved by compressing the seed coat, separating it from the kernel, and thus accomplishing dehulling.Suitable for dehulling hard-shelled materials, it offers high efficiency but faces challenges with varying raw materials, leading to increased seed breakage rates. Oily seeds are especially problematic due to oil seepage during squeezing, causing adhesion and hindering kernel separation.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, L.; Shi, R.; Dai, F.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Chen, J. Current Flaxseed Dehulling Technology in China. Agriculture 2024, 14, 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040632

AMA Style

Chang L, Shi R, Dai F, Zhao W, Zhao Y, Chen J. Current Flaxseed Dehulling Technology in China. Agriculture. 2024; 14(4):632. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040632

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Leilei, Ruijie Shi, Fei Dai, Wuyun Zhao, Yiming Zhao, and Junzhi Chen. 2024. "Current Flaxseed Dehulling Technology in China" Agriculture 14, no. 4: 632. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14040632

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop