Bioactive Compounds in Salicornia patula Duval-Jouve: A Mediterranean Edible Euhalophyte
Departamento de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2021, 10(2), 410; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020410
Submission received: 15 January 2021
/
Revised: 8 February 2021
/
Accepted: 9 February 2021
/
Published: 12 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Extraction, Isolation and Characterization of Natural Compounds in Foods)
Abstract
:Many halophytes have great nutritional and functional potential, providing chemical compounds with biological properties. Salicornia patula Duval-Jouve is a common euhalophyte from saline Mediterranean territories (Spain, Portugal, France, and Italy). In the present work we quantified for the first time the bioactive compounds in S. patula (total phenolic compounds and fatty acids), from Iberian Peninsula localities: littoral-coastal Tinto River basin areas (southwest Spain, the Huelva province), and mainland continental territories (northwest and central Spain, the Valladolid and Madrid provinces). Five phenolic acids including caffeic, coumaric, veratric, salicylic, and transcinnamic have been found with differences between mainland and coastal saltmarshes. S. patula contain four flavonoids: quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, kaempferol/luteolin, apigenin 7-glucoside, and pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside. These last two glycosylated compounds are described for the first time in this genus of Chenopodiaceae. The fatty acid profile described in S. patula stems contains palmitic, oleic, and linoleic acids in high concentrations, while stearic and long-chain fatty acids were detected in low amounts. These new findings confirm that S. patula is a valuable source of bioactive compounds from Mediterranean area.
1. Introduction
Species in the Chenopodiaceae family have been proven to have a high content of minerals, polyphenols, fatty acids, and other compounds. The presence of bioactive compounds in this type of plant represents a challenge due to its possible uses both at a culinary and industrial level [1]. Salicornia species (Chenopodiaceae, Salicornioideae) respond to saline stress by making osmotic adjustments and anatomical, physiological, and metabolic adaptions, and are considered succulent euhalophytes. Salicornia patula Duval-Jouve is a frequent species in saline ecosystems on the Iberian Peninsula, on the coasts of France, Portugal, and Italy [2].
In terms of their elemental content, they accumulate inorganic salts, highlighting Na concentrations, with values higher than 20,000 mg/kg DW (dry weight) [3]. Significant values of K, Ca, and Mg are found in S. patula from Tinto river locations and other Mediterranean areas [4]. One of the bioactive compounds of interest in Salicornia is polyphenol, which in the field of nutrition has been of interest in recent decades. Polyphenols have been proven to have therapeutic effects for cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative disorders, cancer, and obesity [5].
The main classes of phenolic compounds are phenolic acids, flavonoids, stilbenes, and lignans. Flavonoids are present in plants as pigments that protect the body from damage caused by oxidizing agents [6]. In Salicornia europaea L. and Salicornia herbacea L. the presence of flavonoids such as quercetin, kaempferol, or catechin, among others, has been demonstrated [7].
Fatty acids are other bioactive compounds present in vegetables, and some of them, such as essential fatty acids, must be acquired through the diet since humans cannot synthesize them [6]. The presence of fatty acids in the Salicornia genus are found both in its stems and seeds, and some species such as S. europaea have been studied as a source of linoleic and oleic acids [6]. However, traditionally the consumption of Salicornia has been carried out through a mixture of different halophytes due to the taxonomic complexity involved in the Salicornioideae group [8]. This fact reduces functionality at the species and even genus level, where the diversity of bioactive compounds and their specificity in different groups of plants is of the utmost importance.
There is great interest in the study of phenolic compounds in “lesser-known” wild plants, since several studies have revealed the important role they played in human health [9]. Therefore, knowing the importance of new uses of S. patula, which has a long history of being gathered from the wild as a source of food [10], the objective of this work is to analyze for the first time the phenolic compounds and fatty acids in S. patula, both in the coastline marshes and inland salt marshes of the Iberian Peninsula.
2. Materials and Methods
Table 1 includes the data on the collection and geographical locations of S. patula selected samples from the Iberian Peninsula (Spain). Fleshy stems were selected until approximately 500 mg per sample was obtained for the analysis of phenolic compounds (phenolic acids and flavonoids) and fatty acids.
2.1. Preparation of the Methanol Extract
Five hundred milligrams of plant sample were selected with a solution of methanol in water (50 mL/50 mL) at ambient temperature, 25 °C. The extracts were filtered using a Whatman N° 4 filter. The solid residue was then extracted with 30 mL of methanol in water. The extracts were filtered again and re-dissolved with 10 mL of methanol in water. The extractions were performed in three replicates of each sample.
2.2. Total Phenolic Compounds (TPC)
Total phenol content was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method [11] using gallic acid (GA) as per the recommended standard [12]. From these solutions, an aliquot of 0.5 mL of methanolic extract was taken and 2.5 mL of the Folin–Ciocalteu reagent was added and it was left to react for 3 min, then 2 mL of Na2CO3 solution was added and mixed in a shaker (Heidolph, Berlin, Germany). The solution was incubated at a temperature of 40 °C in a dark stove for 1 h. The absorbance was measured at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer and the results were expressed in gallic acid equivalents, using a gallic acid (0.05–0.5 mg/mL) standard curve (Figure 1). To prepare a calibration curve 0.017 g of gallic acid was added, as control or standard, into 100 mL volumetric flasks, and then diluted to a volume of 100 mL with water. These solutions will have a known phenol concentration of 1 mM of gallic acid, the effective range of the assay (Table 2).
2.3. Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (LC–MS)
Chromatographic separation was performed as follows: all of the supplied volume was first dried in a rotary evaporator (Rotavapor Fischer) and later in a lyophilizer Telstar. The total amount of sample obtained was weighed. They were derivatized with Meth-Prep Fisher (EEUU). Meth-Prep II is a 0.2 N methanolic solution of m-trifluoromethylphenyl trimethylammonium hydroxide. This one-step reagent simplifies the transesterification of triglycerides to methyl esters. They were injected into GC/MS.
The chromatographic separation was done in a HPLC-MS Agilent 6120 (Santa Clara, CA, USA) using a C20 column maintained at 35 °C. The chromatography mass spectrometry was carried out at the Servicio Interdepartamental de Investigación from the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM).
2.4. Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectometry (LC–ESI-MS/MS)
Flavonoids were determined using an HPLC-MS Agilent 1200 (Santa Clara, CA, USA) in a C20 column at 35 °C. The composition of the gradient solvent was as follows. The solvent system used was a gradient of acetonitrile (solvent A) and formic acid 2% (solvent B): 0 min, 4% of solvent A; 10 min, 10% of solvent A; 20 min, 20% of solvent A; 30 min, 40% of solvent A; 35 min, 40% of solvent A; 40 min, 60% of solvent A; 45 min, 60% of solvent A; and 55 min, 4% of solvent A. The flow rate was 1 mL/min and runs were monitored with a UV-visible photodiode array detector set at 280 nm (phenolic acids) and 360 nm (flavonols), for a total chromatogram time of 50 min. An injection volume of 5 µL was taken from a 1.2 mg/2 mL. This technique was used to identity the flavonoids in the extract according to their protonation [M + H] + (Table 2), to calculate the relative retention time of each peak in the chromatograms obtained by HPLC.
2.5. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analysis was performed in the Statgraphics 18.0 program. Mean and standard deviations were calculated. To test the possible differences between three or more groups, they were compared using an ANOVA analysis of variance for total phenolic compounds.
3. Results
3.1. Total Phenolic Compounds (TPC)
Samples with the highest content of phenolic compounds are from the La Rábida Tinto river (4.209 mg GA/g plant DW (dry weight)) (Table 3).
Samples from Aldemayor de San Matín (Valladolid) and Colmenar de Oreja (Madrid) show differences regarding their conservation, with 4.091 mg GA/g plant DW and 4.172 mg GA/g plant DW for dry material. For fresh material these samples contain 2.117 mg GA/g plant FW (fresh weight) and 1.313 mg GA/g plant FW.
The results of the statistical analysis are homogeneous and do not show significant differences between the mean values of the studied samples. Sample 6 is the only one that shows a higher standard deviation.
3.2. Phenolic Acids
Transcinnamic acid is present in all S. patula samples. The materials from Tinto, Odiel, and Piedras rivers (Huelva) show relative transcinnamic acid contents between 21% and 39%. The samples collected in mainland territories from the Iberian Peninsula contain between 28% and 37% of the relative percentage (Figure 2 and Figure 3, and Table 4).
In the material from the Tinto river coastal saltmarsh in the Iberian southwest, salicylic acid stands out with more than 60% relative content. Samples from the mainland territories present no more than 22% (Figure 2 and Figure 3, and Table 4).
Samples 4 and 5 from Moguer and El Terrón also present veratric, coumaric, and caffeic acid with percentages close to 26%, 17%, and 8%, respectively (Figure 2).
Material from Aldeamayor de San Martín (samples 10 and 11) contains veratric acid with a relative content of 40–60%, and a transcinnamic acid relative content of 28–37%. Sample 10 also shows the presence of salicylic acid, with a relative content of 20%.
3.3. Flavonoids
All samples of S. patula (Table 5) present quercetin-3-O-rutinoside or rutin, and apigenin 7-glucoside. Samples 4, 5, 10, 12, and 13 also present pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside and luteolin/kaempferol (it has not been possible to determine with precision which of these two compounds are present since there is no standard and both have the same molecular weight (286.24 g/mol)) (Table 6). The chemical structures of these compounds were extracted from Phenol Explorer and are shown in Figure A1.
3.4. Fatty Acids
With respect to fatty acids, our results show that the proportion of total saturated fatty acids (SFAs), except for sample 11, account for 80% of the total 70%. Total monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) account for around 2–3%, such as oleic acid and palmitoleic acid, with the exception of sample 11 from Valladolid where MUFAs account for 12%. Total polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) account for between 6% and 13%. Of these, linoleic is present in all of the samples but a higher concentration was reached in sample 11. Furthermore, this specimen from Aldeamayor de San Martín is the only one that contains linolenic acid (Figure 2 and Figure 3, and Table 7).
Plant materials from the Huelva marshes had differences between them. Samples 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 8, and 9 contained lauric acid, myristic acid, and lignoceric acid (C24), whose relative content ranges between 0.5% and 3%; conversely, samples 4 and 5 contained arachidic acid (C20) and palmitoleic acid with a content between 0.18% and 4%.
The materials from Colmenar de Oreja (Madrid), samples 12 and 13, also present arachidic acid and lignoceric acid with a relative content of around 6% for both compounds.
4. Discussion
4.1. Phenolic Compounds
S. patula shows an increase in TPC values when the material is kept dry while the frozen or fresh material presents more modest values. The TPC data of dried S. patula range between 2.9 and 4.2 mg GA/g DW plant and are higher than those found in stems of S. europaea collected in Romania [13], with 1.04 mg G.A./g plant DW. Other authors describe in S. europaea higher values in stems samples from Turkey [14].
4.2. Phenolic Acids
The content of phenolic compounds in different halophytes has been related to their ability to survive in high salinity conditions. The wide diversity of different phenolic acids in S. patula may be understood as an adaptation mechanism to saline environments [15]. Among these, salicylic acid is present in the highest percentage in S. patula, with 70% relative content in the material collected in Huelva. It is the main phenolic acid in S. europaea [14,16]. Salicylic acid is involved with plant growth and acts as a genetic regulator against salt stress [17].
Transcinnamic acid is present in all of the studied samples of S. patula and ranges between 20% and 40% in content, standing out in interior provinces. Friedman and Jurgens [18] found that transcinnamic acid in plant samples can change depending on the pH of the soil. The differences in the pH values may explain the variation in the content of this acid in S. patula samples.
Veratric acid stands out in the material from inland provinces (Colmenar de Oreja and Aldeamayor de San Martín) with relative contents of up to 40%. Samples from Piedras and Odiel estuary rivers contain a lower percentage of this same bioactive compound. Veratric acid has antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antihypertensive activities [19].
Coumaric acid in S. patula has only been identified in the material collected in the Piedras and Odiel rivers, with a relative content of 19%. Our values for coumaric acid are higher than those published by Zengin et al. in S. europaea [14]. On the other hand, caffeic acid is the minor phenolic acid found in S. patula. In other Salicornia species, higher data have been described, such as in S. europaea from Turkey [14].
4.3. Flavonoids
Most flavonoids are present in plants as esters, glycosides, or polymers. The chemical structure of flavonoids determines the absorption range. For this reason, glycosylation guarantees that some flavonoids are absorbed, giving them prebiotic actions [20].
All the samples of S. patula studied have apigenin 7-glucoside and pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside, both identified for the first time in Salicornia genus. Likewise, all samples have quercetin-3-O-rutinoside, commonly called rutin, an antioxidant compound that improves tolerance to salinity, already identified in other halophytes [14,21,22]
The presence of this flavonol in all Salicornia samples suggests it is an important adaptation to saline environments. Some of the S. patula samples (4, 5, 10, 12, and 13) also present luteolin or kaempferol. Luteolin has been previously identified in S. europaea [8].
4.4. Fatty Acids
Our results show that palmitic acid appears in the highest proportion in S. patula and can exceed 70%. In other Salicornia species, such as Salicornia ramosissima Woods this acid exceeded 20% [23], as in S. europaea [16], and Salicornia bigelovii Torr [24]. In other halophytes like Arthrocnemum indicum is also demonstrated the presence of this acid, with a relative content of more than 18% [25].
Among the monounsaturated fatty acids, palmitoleic acid is only present in the material collected from the southwest Iberian Peninsula. S. patula also contains oleic acid, another monounsaturated fatty acid, that has been described in S. europaea [16] and S. bigelovii [24]. These bioactive compounds prevent the development of cardiovascular disorders, reduce insulin resistance, and strengthen the immune system [8].
Polyunsaturated acids such as linolenic acid have been found in proportions of more than 5% in sample 11, as in other Salicornia species such as S. bigelovii [24]. In S. ramosissima the values for this fatty acid are lower than those found here [26]. Other authors in Salicornia brachiate Roxb reveal a content of 29% [26].
Linoleic acid showed a content of 56% in the samples collected in Aldeamayor de San Martín, Valladolid province. The total polyunsaturated acid content in this population is 61%, a value similar to that described by Patel et al. [27] for S. brachiata. Polyunsaturated fatty acids are bioactive compounds with antifungal activity, and additionally they inhibit carcinogenesis and the progression of atherosclerosis [28].
Long-chain fatty acids, such as arachidonic acid, behenic acid, and lignoceric acid, do not exceed a content of 6% in S. patula. El-Araby et al. [24] provide similar values in S. bigelovii. In other Salicornia species, long-chain fatty acids have been described to appear in lower values, such as S. ramosissima [22].
For all of this, the study of the evaluation of the antioxidant activity of S. patula extracts, through the appropriate tests, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) the 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulphonic acid (ABTS) and the ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP), is necessary to complete the information on bioactive compounds and the differences between species of various origins. We are approaching the study of antioxidant activity in the Salicornia genus in the near future.
5. Conclusions
For the first time, the bioactive compounds (phenolic compounds and fatty acids) present in S. patula are described. The phenolic acids identified in all samples are salicylic, transcinnamic, and veratric acid. Samples from the coastal salt marshes and the Odiel, and Piedras rivers also presented caffeic and coumaric acid. The composition of phenolic acids and flavonoids, like rutin, may be related to adaptation mechanisms in saline environments. Other flavonoids detected for the first time in this species are apigenin-7-glucoside and pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside, with glycosylated structures that confer their prebiotic properties.
The lipid profile shows the presence of palmitic, stearic, oleic, and linoleic as the main fatty acids. Lauric, myristic, and palmitoleic fatty acids were only detected in the material from the coastal salt marshes in lower proportions.
Finally, we show that S. patula is a source of bioactive compounds with important positive biological effects. Its consumption both in a traditional way, or as an additional ingredient, make this Mediterranean euhalophyte a functional food.
Author Contributions
V.d.l.F. Study conception and design. I.S.-G. Data collection, analysis, and interpretation of the results: E.R. Draft manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, CGL2015-66242-R grant.
Data Availability Statement
Data is contained within the article or supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the personnel of the Servicio Interdepartamental de Investigación (SiDi-UAM), especially Rosa Sedano Pérez from this service.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Appendix A. Tentative Flavonoid Compounds Identified in Salicornia patula Extracts
Figure A1.
Structures of the identified flavonoids.
References
- Boscaiu, M.; Vicente, O. Halophytic crops for a salinising world. Bulletin University Agricultural Sciences Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Horticulture 2013, 70, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gasparri, R.; Casavecchia, S.; Galiè, M.; Pesaresi, S.; Soriano, P.; Estrelles, E.; Biondi, E. Germination pattern of Salicornia patula as an adaptation to environmental conditions of the specific populations. Plant Sociol. 2016, 53, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Gavilán, I.; Rufo, L.; Rodríguez, N.; Fuente, V. On the elemental composition of the Mediterranean euhalophyte Salicornia patula Duval-Jouve (Chenopodiaceae) from saline habitats in Spain (Huelva, Toledo and Zamora). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Fuente, V.; Rufo, L.; Rodríguez, N.; Amils, R.; Zuluaga, J. Metal accumulation screening of the Río Tinto flora (Huelva, Spain). Biol. Trace Elem Rese 2010, 134, 318–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cory, H.; Passarelli, S.; Szeto, J.; Tamez, M.; Mattei, J. The role of polyphenols in human health and food systems: A mini review. Front Nutr. 2018, 5, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Loconsole, D.; Cristiano, G.; De Lucia, B. Glassworts: From Wild Salt Marsh Species to Sustainable Edible Crops. Agriculture 2019, 9, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Roshandel, P.; Shamsi, F. Analysis of oilseed of Halophytic species: Atriplex griffithii, Haloxylon ammodendron, Salicornia europaea, Salsola yazdiana. J. Adv. Lab Res. Biol. 2015, 6, 83–88. [Google Scholar]
- Kadereit, G.; Ball, P.; Beer, S.; Mucina, L.; Sokoloff, D.; Teege, P.; Yaprak, A.E.; Freitag, H.A. A taxonomic nightmare comes true: Phylogeny and biogeography of glassworts (Salicornia L., Chenopodiaceae). Taxon 2007, 56, 1143–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Cámara, M.; Fernández-Ruiz, V.; Ruiz-Rodríguez, B.M. Wild Edible Plants as Sources of Carotenoids, Fibre, Phenolics and Other Non-Nutrient Bioactive Compounds. In Mediterranean Wild Edible Plants. Ethnobotany and Food Composition Tables; Sánchez-Mata, M.C., Tardío, J., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 187–205. [Google Scholar]
- Urbano, M.; Tomaselli, V.; Bisignano, V.; Veronico, G.; Hammer, K.; Laghetti, G. Salicornia patula Duval- Jouve: From gathering of wild plants to some attempts of cultivation in Apulia region (southern Italy). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2017, 64, 1465–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Slinkard, K.; Singleton, V.L. Total phenol analysis: Automation and comparison with manual methods. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 1977, 28, 49–55. [Google Scholar]
- Andrés-Lacueva, C.; Medina-Remón, A.; Llorach, R.; Urpi-Sarda, M.; Khan, N.; Chiva-Blanch, G.; Zamora-Ros, R.; Rotches-Ribalta, M.; Lamuela-Raventos, R.M. Phenolic compounds: Chemistry and occurrence in fruits and vegetables. In Fruit and Vegetable Phytochemicals: Chemistry, Nutritional Value and Stability; De la Rosa, L., Alvarez-Parrilla, E., Gonzalez-Aguilar, G.A., Eds.; John Wiley and Sons: Oxford, UK, 2010; pp. 53–88. [Google Scholar]
- Grigore, M.N.; Oprica, L. Halophytes as possible source of antioxidant compounds, in a scenario based on threatened agriculture and food crisis. Iran J. Public Health 2015, 44, 1153. [Google Scholar]
- Zengin, G.; Aumeeruddy-Elalfi, Z.; Mollica, A.; Yilmaz, M.A.; Mahomoodally, M.F. In vitro and in silico perspectives on biological and phytochemical profile of three halophyte species—A source of innovative phytopharmaceuticals from nature. Phytomedicine 2018, 38, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nikalje, G.C.; Nikam, T.D.; Suprasanna, P. Looking at Halophytic Adaptation to High Salinity through Genomics Landscape. Curr. Genom. 2017, 18, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Essaidi, I.; Brahmi, Z.; Snoussi, A.; Koubaier, H.B.H.; Casabianca, H.; Abe, N.; El Ormi, A.; Chaabouni, M.M.; Bouzouita, N. Phytochemical investigation of Tunisian Salicornia herbacea L., antioxidant, antimicrobial and cytochrome P450 (CYPs) inhibitory activities of its methanol extract. Food Control 2013, 32, 125–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Miura, K.; Tada, Y. Regulation of water, salinity, and cold stress responses by salicylic acid. Front Plant Sci. 2014, 5, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Friedman, M.; Jürgens, H.S. Effect of pH on the stability of plant phenolic compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2101–2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Patra, A.K. An overview of antimicrobial properties of different classes of phytochemicals. In Dietary Phytochemicals and Microbes; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 1–32. [Google Scholar]
- D’Archivio, M.; Filesi, C.; Varì, R.; Scazzocchio, B.; Masella, R. Bioavailability of the Polyphenols: Status and Controversias. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010, 11, 1321–1342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Castañeda-Loaiza, V.; Oliveira, M.; Santos, T.; Schüler, L.; Lima, A.R.; Gama, F.; Salazar, M.; Neng, N.; Nogueira, J.M.F.; Varela, J.; et al. Wild vs. cultivated halophytes: Nutritional and functional differences. Food Chem. 2020, 333, 127536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chekroun-Bechlaghem, N.; Belyagoubi-Benhammou, N.; Belyagoubi, L.; Gismondi, A.; Nanni, V.; Di Marco, G.; Atik Bekkara, F. Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of Tamarix africana, Arthrocnemum macrostachyum and Suaeda fruticosa, three halophyte species from Algeria. Plant Biosyst. 2019, 153, 843–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barreira, L.; Resek, E.; Rodrigues, M.J.; Rocha, M.I.; Pereira, H.; Bandarra, N.; Moreira da Silva, M.; Varela, J.; Custódio, L. Halophytes: Gourmet food with nutritional health benefits? J. Food Comp. Anal. 2017, 59, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El-Araby, R.; Rezk, A.I.; El-Enin, S.A.; Nofal, O.A.; El-Nasharty, A.B. Comparative evaluation of Salicornia bigelovii oil planted under different treatments. Bull. Nat. Rese Cent 2020, 44, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Maatallah Zaier, M.; Ciudad-Mulero, M.; Cámara, M.; Pereira, C.; Ferreira, I.; Achour, L.; Kacem, A. Revalorization of Tunisian wild Amaranthaceae halophytes: Nutritional composition variation in two different phenotypes stages. J. Food Comp. Anal. 2020, 89, 103463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Isca, V.M.; Seca, A.M.; Pinto, D.C.; Silva, H.; Silva, A.M. Lipophilic profile of the edible halophyte Salicornia ramosissima. Food Chem. 2014, 165, 330–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Patel, M.K.; Pandey, S.; Brahmbhatt, H.R.; Mishra, A.; Jha, B. Lipid content and fatty acid profile of selected halophytic plants reveal a promising source of renewable energy. Biomass Bioenergy 2019, 124, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Margină, D.; Ungurianu, A.; Purdel, C.; Nitulescu, G.M.; Tsoukalas, D.; Sarandi, E.; Thanasoula, M.; Burykina, T.I.; Tekos, F.; Buha, A.; et al. Analysis of the intricate effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids and polyphenols on inflammatory pathways in health and disease. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 111558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
Gallic acid equivalent calibration curve.
Figure 2.
Chromatograms of the studied samples: phenolic acids and fatty acids. (a): Tinto river territories, samples 1–3, 6–9; (b): Odiel and Piedras river territories, samples 4–5; (c): mainland territories, samples 10–13; and (d): mainland territories, Valladolid, sample 11.
Figure 2.
Chromatograms of the studied samples: phenolic acids and fatty acids. (a): Tinto river territories, samples 1–3, 6–9; (b): Odiel and Piedras river territories, samples 4–5; (c): mainland territories, samples 10–13; and (d): mainland territories, Valladolid, sample 11.
Figure 3.
Total relative percentages of phenolic acids and fatty acids.
Table 1.
Information about the sampled localities for S. patula.
| ID | Geographical Location and Collection Date | Latitude/Longitude |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spain, Huelva, La Rábida, Tinto river, 24 October 2017 | 37.21295617/−6.93198742 |
| 2 | Spain, Huelva, La Rábida, Tinto river, 24 October 2017 | 37.21295617/−6.93198742 |
| 3 | Spain, Huelva, La Rábida, Tinto river, 24 October 2017 | 37.21295617/−6.93198742 |
| 4 | Spain, Huelva, Moguer, Odiel river, 02 December 2009 | 37.29613488/−7.05380284 |
| 5 | Spain, Huelva, El Terrón, Piedras river, 19 September 2007 | 37.19231363/−7.33811922 |
| 6 | Spain, Huelva, San Juan del Puerto, Tinto river, 11 May 2003 | 37.30121786/−6.82803804 |
| 7 | Spain, Huelva, Tinto river estuary, 15 December 2017 | 37.21315236/−6.9432506 |
| 8 | Spain, Huelva, Tinto river estuary, 15 December 2017 | 37.21315236/−6.9432506 |
| 9 | Spain, Huelva, Tinto river estuary, 15 December 2017 | 37.21315236/−6.9432506 |
| 10 | Spain, Valladolid, Aldeamayor de San Martín, 22 October 2017 | 41.50816286/−4.65960225 |
| 11 | Spain, Valladolid, Aldeamayor de San Martín, 22 October 2017 | 41.50816286/−4.65960225 |
| 12 | Spain, Madrid, Colmenar de Oreja, 10 November 2017 | 40.1379148/−3.5709978 |
| 13 | Spain, Madrid, Colmenar de Oreja, 10 November 2017 | 40.1379148/−3.5709978 |
Table 2.
Gallic acid data with absorption spectrophotometric values (n = 3).
| Gallic Acid Curve | Concentration (mM) | Concentration (mg/mL) | ABS | ABS | ABS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 0 | 0.00 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| 1 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.085 | 0.087 | 0.089 |
| 2 | 0.1 | 0.02 | 0.178 | 0.178 | 0.176 |
| 3 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 0.331 | 0.331 | 0.329 |
| 4 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.564 | 0.566 | 0.578 |
| 5 | 0.4 | 0.07 | 0.713 | 0.703 | 0.709 |
| 6 | 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.904 | 0.911 | 0.907 |
| 7 | 0.6 | 0.10 | 1.091 | 1.082 | 1.094 |
Table 3.
Ratio of total phenolic compounds (TPC) determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method. SD: standard deviation. For each column different superscript letters (a and b) mean statistically significant variations among samples.
Table 3.
Ratio of total phenolic compounds (TPC) determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method. SD: standard deviation. For each column different superscript letters (a and b) mean statistically significant variations among samples.
| ID | Sample Weight | TPC | SD | Material Conservation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.581 g | 3.128 mg GA/g plant a | 0.123 | Fresh material |
| 2 | 0.590 g | 4.209 mg GA/g plant a | 0.154 | Dry material |
| 3 | 0.540 g | 4.086 mg GA/g plant a | 0.027 | Frozen material |
| 4 | 0.524 g | 3.171 mg GA/g plant a | 0.173 | Dry material |
| 5 | 0.565 g | 3.143 mg GA/g plant a | 0.078 | Dry material |
| 6 | 0.531 g | 3.428 mg GA/g plant b | 1.270 | Dry material |
| 7 | 0.581 g | 1.372 mg GA/g plant a | 0.020 | Fresh material |
| 8 | 0.572 g | 2.989 mg GA/g plant a | 0.893 | Dry material |
| 9 | 0.581 g | 2.530 mg GA/g plant a | 0.118 | Frozen material |
| 10 | 0.584 g | 4.091 mg GA/g plant a | 0.124 | Dry material |
| 11 | 0.595 g | 2.117 mg GA/g plant a | 0.027 | Fresh material |
| 12 | 0.514 g | 1.313 mg GA/g plant a | 0.011 | Fresh material |
| 13 | 0.591 g | 4.172 mg GA/g plant a | 0.122 | Dry material |
Table 4.
Relative content of phenolic compounds in S. patula samples. nd: not detected.
| ID | Coumaric Acid | Salycilic Acid | Veratric Acid | Caffeic Acid | Transcinnamic Acid |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | nd | 72.04 (0.02) | nd | nd | 25.60 (0.05) |
| 2 | nd | 69.30 (0.01) | nd | nd | 23.45 (0.04) |
| 3 | nd | 70.08 (0.01) | nd | nd | 21.90 (0.02) |
| 4 | 19.07 (0.06) | nd | 26.06 (0.02) | 9.88 (0.02) | 39.08 (0.11) |
| 5 | 17.76 (0.05) | nd | 28.66 (0.01) | 8.70 (0.00) | 37.12 (0.01) |
| 6 | nd | 71.08 (0.04) | nd | nd | 24.68 (0.01) |
| 7 | nd | 68.12 (0.11) | nd | nd | 24.50 (0.09) |
| 8 | nd | 70.22 (0.05) | nd | nd | 22.21 (0.04) |
| 9 | nd | 69.04 (0.06) | nd | nd | 24.02 (0.03) |
| 10 | nd | 20.46 (0.01) | 40.16 (0.02) | nd | 28.33 (0.03) |
| 11 | nd | nd | 59.98 (0.02) | nd | 37.12 (0.01) |
| 12 | nd | 8.69 (0.02) | 38.77 (0.01) | nd | 29.50 (0.05) |
| 13 | nd | 22.31 (0.01) | 39.44 (0.02) | nd | 31.41 (0.01) |
Table 5.
Tentative identification flavonoids in S. patula.
| Flavonoid Compound | Experimental Mass M-H m/z | MS/MS (m/z) |
|---|---|---|
| Quercetin-3-O-rutinoside (rutin) | 610 | 609–610 |
| Apigenin-7-glucoside | 433 | 433 |
| Kaempferol/Luteolin | 287 | 285–286 |
| Pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside | 580 | 577–579 |
Table 6.
Main tentative flavonoids in S. patula according to their retention time. Numbers 1–13 correspond to the identification of the studied materials collected in Table 1. +++ = presence.
Table 6.
Main tentative flavonoids in S. patula according to their retention time. Numbers 1–13 correspond to the identification of the studied materials collected in Table 1. +++ = presence.
| Retention Time (min) | Tentative Identity of Flavonoids | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 17.6 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 19 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 21.3 | Apigenin-7-glucoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | |||
| 21.9 | Pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 23.6 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 25.5 | Rutin | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| 26 | Luteolin/kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 27.6 | Apigenin-7-glucoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| 27.8 | Pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 28 | Rutin | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| 28.8 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 29.1 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 29.5 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 31.1 | Pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 31.4 | Rutin | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| 37.4 | Apigenin-7-glucoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| 39.5 | Luteolin/Kaempferol | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 42.5 | Apigenin-7-glucoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
| 44.8 | Pelargonidin 3-O-rutinoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ||||||||
| 47.8 | Pelargonidin-3-O-rutinoside | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ |
Table 7.
Relative content of fatty acids (%) in S. patula by HPLC-values expressed as: mean (standard deviation, n − 1) n = 3. Legend: Lauric Acid (C12:0); Myristic acid (C14:0); Palmitic acid (C16:0); Palmitoleic acid (C16:1); Stearic acid (C18:0); Oleic acid (C18:1); Linoleic acid (C18:2); Linolenic acid (C18:3); Arachidonic acid (C20:0); Behenic acid (C22:0); Lignoceric acid (C24:0); SFAs (saturated fatty acids); MUFAs (monounsaturated fatty acids); PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty acids). nd: not detected.
Table 7.
Relative content of fatty acids (%) in S. patula by HPLC-values expressed as: mean (standard deviation, n − 1) n = 3. Legend: Lauric Acid (C12:0); Myristic acid (C14:0); Palmitic acid (C16:0); Palmitoleic acid (C16:1); Stearic acid (C18:0); Oleic acid (C18:1); Linoleic acid (C18:2); Linolenic acid (C18:3); Arachidonic acid (C20:0); Behenic acid (C22:0); Lignoceric acid (C24:0); SFAs (saturated fatty acids); MUFAs (monounsaturated fatty acids); PUFAs (polyunsaturated fatty acids). nd: not detected.
| ID | Lauric Acid (C12:0) | Myristic Acid (C14:0) | Palmitic Acid (C16:0) | Palmitoleic Acid (C16:1) | Stearic Acid (C18:0) | Oleic Acid (C18:1) | Linoleic Acid (C18:2) | Linolenic Acid (C18:3) | Arachidonic Acid (C20:0) | Behenic Acid (C22:0) | Lignoceric Acid (C24:0) | TOTAL SFAs | TOTAL MUFAs | TOTA PUFAs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.22 (0.05) | 3.35 (0.07) | 70.45 (0.62) | nd | 4.12 (0.07) | 2.17 (0.02) | 6.88 (0.02) | nd | nd | 0.77 (0.01) | 0.71 (0.00) | 82.82 | 2.17 | 6.88 |
| 2 | 3.28 (0.06) | 3.42 (0.08) | 72.96 (0.77) | nd | 4.44 (0.11) | 2.82 (0.01) | 6.75 (0.04) | nd | nd | 0.75 (0.01) | 0.69 (0.02) | 85.54 | 2.82 | 6.75 |
| 3 | nd | 3.31 (0.09) | 69.66 (0.31) | nd | 4.05 (0.06) | 3.09 (0.09) | 7.02 (0.07) | nd | nd | 0.78 (0.01) | 0.72 (0.01) | 78.52 | 3.09 | 2.02 |
| 4 | nd | nd | 71.20 (0.28) | 0.17 (0.00) | 4.61 (0.12) | 2.88 (0.23) | 12.90 (0.01) | nd | 3.92 (0.01) | 4.31 (0.11) | 1.35 (0.01) | 85.39 | 3.05 | 12.90 |
| 5 | nd | nd | 69.30 (0.33) | 0.18 (0.01) | 4.28 (0.03) | 2.66 (0.12) | 13.33 (0.04) | nd | 4.08(0.02) | 4.38 (0.05) | 1.21 (0.00) | 83.25 | 2.84 | 13.33 |
| 6 | 3.25 (0.01) | 3.33 (0.11) | 70.43 (0.55) | nd | 4.23 (0.09) | 2.55 (0.05) | 7.11 (0.05) | nd | nd | 0.81 (0.02) | 0.98 (0.01) | 83.03 | 2.55 | 7.11 |
| 7 | 3.72 (0.00) | 3.41 (0.09) | 71.08 (0.26) | nd | 5.02 (0.08) | 2.42 (0.07) | 6.42 (0.04) | nd | nd | 0.73 (0.02) | 0.66 (0.01) | 84.60 | 2.42 | 6.42 |
| 8 | 3.31 (0.02) | 3.37 (0.02) | 71.41 (0.32) | nd | 4.87 (0.09) | 3.01 (0.11) | 6.77 (0.02) | nd | nd | 0.73 (0.01) | 0.66 (0.01) | 84.35 | 3.01 | 6.77 |
| 9 | 3.33 (0.07) | 3.44 (0.06) | 72.50 (0.22) | nd | 4.56 (0.04) | 2.12 (0.05) | 6.70 (0.01) | nd | nd | 0.71 (0.01) | 0.70 (0.02) | 85.23 | 2.12 | 6.70 |
| 10 | nd | nd | 71.83 (0.04) | nd | 4.24 (0.06) | 2.49 (0.01) | 9.55 (0.02) | nd | 4.14 (0.01) | 5.00 (0.07) | 6.11 (0.03) | 87.09 | 2.49 | 9.55 |
| 11 | nd | nd | 21.51 (0.81) | nd | 2.35 (0.01) | 12.81 (0.03) | 56.02 (0.04) | 5.88 (0.07) | 1.08 (0.06) | 1.69 (0.10) | nd | 26.63 | 12.81 | 61.90 |
| 12 | nd | nd | 69.80(0.35) | nd | 4.71 (0.08) | 2.63 (0.04) | 10.88 (0.05) | nd | 4.52 (0.03) | 5.19 (0.01) | 6.04 (0.02) | 84.29 | 2.63 | 10.88 |
| 13 | nd | nd | 70.57 (0.51) | nd | 4.56 (0.07) | 2.56 (0.08) | 10.31 (0.02) | nd | 4.61 (0.02) | 5.31 (0.03) | 6.12 (0.07) | 86.17 | 2.56 | 10.31 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Sánchez-Gavilán, I.; Ramírez, E.; de la Fuente, V. Bioactive Compounds in Salicornia patula Duval-Jouve: A Mediterranean Edible Euhalophyte. Foods 2021, 10, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020410
AMA Style
Sánchez-Gavilán I, Ramírez E, de la Fuente V. Bioactive Compounds in Salicornia patula Duval-Jouve: A Mediterranean Edible Euhalophyte. Foods. 2021; 10(2):410. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020410
Chicago/Turabian StyleSánchez-Gavilán, Irene, Esteban Ramírez, and Vicenta de la Fuente. 2021. "Bioactive Compounds in Salicornia patula Duval-Jouve: A Mediterranean Edible Euhalophyte" Foods 10, no. 2: 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10020410
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
